Reactor and Catalyst Design

GBH Enterprises, Ltd.
Process Engineering Guide:

GBHE-PEG-RXT-807
Reactor and Catalyst Design
Information contained in this publication or as otherwise supplied to Users is

believed to be accurate and correct at time of going to press, and is given in
good faith, but it is for the User to satisfy itself of the suitability of the information
for its own particular purpose. GBHE gives no warranty as to the fitness of this
information for any particular purpose and any implied warranty or condition
(statutory or otherwise) is excluded except to the extent that exclusion is
prevented by law. GBHE accepts no liability resulting from reliance on this
information. Freedom under Patent, Copyright and Designs cannot be assumed.
Refinery Process Stream Purification Refinery Process Catalysts Troubleshooting Refinery Process Catalyst Start-Up / Shutdown
Activation Reduction In-situ Ex-situ Sulfiding Specializing in Refinery Process Catalyst Performance Evaluation Heat & Mass
Balance Analysis Catalyst Remaining Life Determination Catalyst Deactivation Assessment Catalyst Performance
Characterization Refining & Gas Processing & Petrochemical Industries Catalysts / Process Technology - Hydrogen Catalysts /
Process Technology Ammonia Catalyst Process Technology - Methanol Catalysts / process Technology Petrochemicals
Specializing in the Development & Commercialization of New Technology in the Refining & Petrochemical Industries
Web Site: www.GBHEnterprises.com
Process Engineering Guide:
Reactor and Catalyst Design
CONTENTS
SECTION
INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE
SCOPE
FIELD OF APPLICATION
DEFINITIONS
CATALYST DESIGN
4.1
4.2
4.3
Equivalent Pellet Diameter

Voidage
Pellet Density
3
6
8
REACTOR DESIGN
CATALYST SUPPORT
10
6.1
Choice of Support
10
TABLES
CATALYST SUPPORT SHAPES
12
SECONDARY REFORMER SPREADSHEET
13
FIGURES
1
GRAPH OF EFFECTIVENESS v THIELE MODULUS
VARIATION OF COSTS WITH CATALYST SIZE
VARIATION OF COSTS WITH CATALYST BED VOIDAGE
VARIATION OF COSTS WITH VESSEL DIAMETER
INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE
When the catalyst chemistry of a new fixed feed chemical reaction has been
developed, decisions need to be made about the catalyst design. The issues that
need to be decided are:
(a)
The catalyst particle size.
(b)
The catalyst shape to give a reasonable optimum pressure drop in the

catalyst bed.
(c)
The catalyst particle density to make the catalyst particles reasonably

effective.
These issues are closely related to the reactor shape and the cost of pressure
drop.
This Process Engineering Guide provides some explanation of these issues and
equations by which the key parameters can be determined.
SCOPE
This Process Engineering Guide deals with the design of the catalyst, particularly
its size and shape, and the reactor geometry as well as catalyst support types. It
does not cover the chemical selection of the catalyst.
FIELD OF APPLICATION
This Guide applies to process engineers and technologists in GBH Enterprises

worldwide, who may be involved in the design of reactors and catalysts.
DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this Guide no specific definitions apply.
CATALYST DESIGN
The design of catalyst particles can be characterized by three independent

variables:
(a)
Equivalent pellet diameter
de
(b)
Voidage
(c)
Density
These can all be optimized.
4.1
Equivalent Pellet Diameter
Larger catalyst size leads to:

(a) Lower pressure drop in reactor:
(1)
Lower compression power.
(b) Lower catalyst effectiveness:

(1)
(2)
(3)
Larger catalyst volume

Higher vessel cost
Higher catalyst cost.
Thiele modulus F = b x de
.......................................... (1)
where:
b
is assumed to be a constant (probably related to the pore structure)
de
is the equivalent sphere diameter of the particle.

de = 6 x particle volume / particle surface area
.......................... (2)
For a spherical catalyst particle:

Effectiveness E = 3/F x (1/tanh(F) - 1/F))
................. (3)
The constant b may be calculated from measurements of the effective catalyst

activity at two different particle sizes.
The intrinsic activity is defined as:
Intrinsic Activity = Apparent Activity / Effectiveness ....... (4)
4.1.1
Example: Calculation of Intrinsic Activity
Results from pellet testing give:

Test
Pellet size
1
2
2
4
Apparent Activity
4.2
3
Figure 1 shows a graph of Effectiveness v Thiele Modulus based on Equation 3.

FIGURE 1 GRAPH OF EFFECTIVENESS v THIELE MODULUS
What are the Thiele Moduli for the different pellet sizes and the intrinsic activity?
Using Figure 1, it can be seen that to get an apparent activity increase of 40% for
a halving of the pellet diameter, the only points that will fit are:
F = 2,
E = 0.8
F = 4,
E = 0.57
Thus, from Equation 4, the Intrinsic activity is 4.2 / 0.8 = 5.25.

4.1.2 Pressure Drop
For turbulent flow:
Pressure drop P = 2 x Velocity head x 1.75 x (1 - e) x L / (e3 x de) (5)
where:
e
L
is the bed voidage

is vessel length or height.
For axial flow:

Capitalized cost = Cp x V / (de x D6)
.............................. (6)
where:
Cp
V
D
is a constant for fixed voidage

is the catalyst volume
is the catalyst bed diameter.
4.1.3 Catalyst Volume

Catalyst volume (V):
V = V0 / E
................................................................ (7)
where:
V0 is the catalyst volume for unit effectiveness.
Vessel cost:
Capital cost = Cv x (V + D3)
....................................... (8)
where:
Cv is a constant.
Catalyst cost:
Capitalized cost = Ccat x V
............................................ (9)
where:
Ccat is a constant that depends on catalyst cost and catalyst change frequency.
Calculate the parameter (q):
q = 1.89 / (Cv + Ccat) x (Cv / V0)0.67 x (Cp x b)0.33 .............................(10)
For axial flow in an adiabatic pressure vessel optimum pellet size is given by:
q = (b x de)0.375 x (0.4 + 0.022 x (b x de)2) .................................... (11)
If q < 20, calculate:
de = (2.5 x q)0.375 / b
................................................. (12)
If q > 20, calculate:

d e = (q / 0.022)3/14 / b
................................................. (13)
If optimum pellet diameter is greater than 3mm

If optimum diameter is less than 3mm
- use pellets or rings.
- examine other supports (see later).
The necessary data to determine the Thiele Modulus and hence the optimum
pellet diameter of most of the catalysts that GBHE uses is not available.
Typical optimum particle sizes:
Ammonia plant:
HT Shift
Methanator
Secondary Reformer
Methanol synthesis
3.8 mm
1.8 mm
0.1 mm
4.7 mm
Figure 2 shows the variation of capitalized costs (pressure drop cost, vessel cost,
catalyst cost and total cost) and effectiveness with catalyst size.
FIGURE 2
VARIATION OF COSTS WITH CATALYST SIZE
4.2
Voidage
Higher voidage leads to:
(a)
Lower pressure drop.
(b)
Larger catalyst vessel.
It is possible to increase voidage by moving to more eccentric particles, i.e.

length / diameter L / D ratio greater than 1.3, or by using rings instead of pellets.
4.2.1 Pressure Drop Cost
Pressure drop cost:
Capitalized cost = Cp1 x Vs / D6 / e3
................. (14)
where:
Cp1 is a constant for constant particle diameter, etc.
Vs is the solid volume of catalyst
D is the vessel diameter
e is the bed voidage.
Vs = V x (1 - e)
............................................................... (15)
where:
V is the catalyst volume of catalyst.
4.2.2 Vessel Cost

Vessel cost:
Capital cost = Cv x (V + D3) ............................................. (16)
where:
Cv is a constant
Calculate the parameter (w):

w = 1.89 x (Cp1 / Cv / Vs 2 )0.33
...................................... (17)
For axial flow in an adiabatic pressure vessel:

Optimum voidage = w0.5 / (1 + w 0.5)
If optimum voidage is less than 0.4
If optimum voidage is greater than 0.4
Typical optimum voidages:
........................... (18)
- use pellets or beads.

- use rings or maybe eccentric
Ammonia plant secondary reformer

Ammonia plant methanator
Methanol plant converter
0.5
0.36
0.5
The catalyst needs to be strong to maintain a voidage above 0.4, so GBHE still
uses pellets for methanol synthesis catalyst.
Figure 3 shows the variation of costs (pressure drop cost, vessel cost and total
cost) with catalyst bed voidage.
FIGURE 3
VARIATION OF COSTS WITH CATALYST BED VOIDAGE
4.3
Pellet Density
Higher density gives:

(a)
(b)
More active catalyst component.

Lower pore volume:
(1)
Lower effectiveness
(2)
Possibly lower selectivity.
There appear to be no established relationships to determine optimum pellet

density.
5
REACTOR DESIGN
Optimum length to diameter ratio of the reactor may be determined as follows:

Pressure drop cost:
Capitalized cost = Cp x V / (de x D6) ................................ (6)
where:
Cp is a constant for fixed voidage
V is the catalyst volume
de is the equivalent sphere diameter
D is the catalyst bed diameter.
Vessel cost:
Capital cost = Cv x (V + D3) ............................................ (8)
where:
Cv is a constant.
Optimum diameter D = ( 2 x Cp x V / (Cv x de))1/9 ...... (19)
If optimum L / D ratio is greater than 1
If optimum L / D ratio is between 0.2 and 1
If optimum L / D ratio is less than 0.2
- use axial flow in vertical vessel.

- consider horizontal vessel.
- consider radial flow vessel.
Typical optimum L / D ratios:

Ammonia plant secondary reformer
Ammonia plant desulfurizer
Ammonia plant LT shift
0.8
2.8
1.1
Figure 4 shows the variation of costs (vessel cost, pressure drop cost and total
cost) with vessel diameter).
FIGURE 4
VARIATION OF COSTS WITH VESSEL DIAMETER
CATALYST SUPPORT TYPES

The following catalyst support types are available:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Pellets, beads, extrudates

Rings.
Monoliths (honeycombs).
Ceramic foams (macroporous catalyst):
(1)
Sheet
(2)
Pellets.
Knitted wire mesh.
Multi-holed extrudates
6.1
Choice Of Support
6.1.1 General Guidance

(a)
Use pellets, rings or extrudates when optimum particle diameter is

greater than 2 mm.
(b)
Use rings if optimum voidage is greater than 0.4.
(c)
Use monoliths if optimum particle diameter is less than 2 mm and

cost of pressure drop is high.
(d)
Use ceramic foams or knitted wire mesh if optimum particle

diameter is less than 1 mm.
(e)
Use multi-holed extrudates when optimum particle diameter is less

than 2 mm and using a tubular reactor.
Other factors that come into play are:

(1)
Length / diameter limitations.
(2)
Fouling.
(3)
Heat transfer limit in tubular reactors.
(4)
Vessel length / particle diameter ratio.
(5)
Degree of conversion required.
(6)
Want to be film diffusion limited.
6.1.2 Quantitative Evaluation

The best method to evaluate alternative catalysts is on a spreadsheet model. In
order to do this the supports need to be characterized.
Since most novel supports are only generally used when the catalyst is severely
pore diffusion limited (in order to get high surface areas), they can be
characterized most easily on the basis of their geometric surface area.
The types of support can be characterized by:
Total bed voidage e = 1 - (1- eb ) x (1- ep) ................................ (20)

where:
eb
ep
is the Interparticle voidage

is the Intraparticle voidage.
Specific geometric surface area per unit volume of bed (As):

As = 6 x (1- e) / de ........................................... (21)
where:
de
is the equivalent sphere diameter.
Specific pressure drop (Ps) is the pressure drop as velocity heads per unit
geometric surface area.
For turbulent flow through pellets, spheres, rings, gauze or ceramic foams:
Ps = 0.58 / eb3
................................ (22)
For multi-holed extrudates of typical dimensions (particle size / de = 4):

Ps = 0.18 / eb3 ............................................................. (23)
For monoliths with turbulent flow:
Ps = 0.015 / ep3 ......................................................... (24)
For monoliths with laminar flow (Re < 3500 ):

Reynolds number Re = actual velocity x hole diameter / viscosity.. (25)
Hole diameter = 2/3 x de x ep / (1 ep)
................................. (26)
Ps = 16 / Re / ep3 ...................................................... (27)

Pressure drop:
Pressure drop = Ps x surface area x superficial velocity head ... (28)
6.1.3 Cost of Catalyst
For some types of support it is most appropriate to measure the cost of the
catalyst per unit volume, whereas for others, it is appropriate to measure it per
unit geometric surface area.
The vessel cost can be determined as before.
Table 1 details typical manufacturing costs for each catalyst support shape.
TABLE 1
CATALYST SUPPORT SHAPES
6.1.4 Example: Secondary Reformer

What is the optimum support and surface area / unit volume for the following
example:
Surface area required A
6000 m2
Cost of vessel Cd
3600 (V + D3)
Capitalized pressure drop cost Cp
2 / pascal
Mass flow M
38 kg / s
Density
5 kg / m3
Catalyst life
2 yrs
Viscosity * 1000
0.4
Factor for optimum diameter b
1990
The optimum support and surface area / unit volume can be determined from
Table 2.
TABLE 2
SECONDARY REFORMER SPREADSHEET

Reactor and Catalyst Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Reactor and Catalyst Design

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Reactor and Catalyst Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the document discussing?

What is the document discussing?

What factors are considered in catalyst design?

What factors are considered in catalyst design?

GBH Enterprises, Ltd.

Process Engineering Guide: