TP - RTT Calculation UMTS
TP - RTT Calculation UMTS
TA in 2G (GSM)
We've already talked about TA in GSM in another tutorial, so let's just remember the most
important concept.
TA (Timing Advance) allows us to identify the distribution of 2G (GSM) users regarding its
serving cell, based on signal propagation delay between the the UE's and the BTS. The GSM
mobile (from now on, we will call here UE too - as in 3G) receives data from BTS, and 3
time slots later sends its data. It is sufficient if the mobile is close to the BTS, however,
when the UE is far away, it must take into account the delay that the signal will have to go
through the radio path.
So: the UE sends the TA data together with other measures for the necessary time
adjustments to be made.
In this way, we indirectly get a map with the distribution of users, or their probable location
area, corresponding to the coverage area of the cell, with a minimum and maximum radius.
The following figure shows this more clearly, for an antenna with 65 HBW, and maximum
(1) and minimum (2) radius.
As already mentioned, the information does not come from the UE as in GSM, but is the
information that the RNC already has to make the communication possible: the information
of this delay, the Propagation Delay Information Element (IE) is sent every 3 chips.
In other words, have the Propagation Delay with granularity of 234 meters!
Note: it is important to know that this distance information is available to the system not
only in the establishment of the call, but also during the entire existence of it.
In an ideal world, first person speech travels up to the second one, taking a certain amount
of time (t1), and the speech of the second person returns with a time (t2). So, we have a
total time elapsed from when the first person said 'hi' till he received the other guy's
answer. This time is the Round Trip Time, or the time at which a signal travels a route until
the response is received back at the source.
Bringing this analogy to an UE and a NodeB, we have the image below.
In fact, the approach above is very close to real. But we have to consider also the time in
which the receiver takes to 'process' the information, or the time it takes to respond after
receiving the information.
Considering then this 'latency' time (TL), the RTT is so as:
But let's go back to the case where we only use the information of Propagation Delay - that
is our focus today - and that already gives us sufficient allowance for several very
interesting analysis.
Actually, that's not what happens, because as we told before, they may be grouped into
ranges. Note: the reason for this is not the case, but really too many ranges may even
disrupt analysis.
TP (Propagation Delay WCDMA in Huawei) has 12 ranges.
Note: See however that the amount of ranges here (GSM) is much bigger, and only begin to
be grouped from 30 (from almost 17 km!).
With the counters organized in so different ways, be grouped by different ranges
granularities, different distance (550 m for GSM and 234 m for WCDMA) it is very difficult to
analyze the propagations, or rather, it is almost impossible to compare them...
And so what does we do, since we need to analyze the distribution of the UE's in a generic
way, doesn't matter if it is using 2G or 3G?
The solution that we found in telecomHall was to make an 'approach', that is, a way to be
able to see where we have more concentrated UE's, no matter if at the time they are using
2G or 3G. Even because, this 'distribution' among Technologies and Carriers depends on
several factors, such as selection and handover parameters, and also physical adjustments
of radiant system. But the 'concentration' of users does not depend on these factors: the
total amount of users in a particular area is always the same!
To this, the module 'Hunter Propagation Analyzer' uses a methodology and 'particular'
counters, allowing to do this approach: we have created a range, and called it PDTA. As the
3G (Huawei, which we are using as an example) has less ranges - only 12, we made the
initial PDTA definition based on it. The result can be seen in the table below.
Of course this approach or 'methodology' is not perfect, but in practice the outcome is very
efficient. In addition, if you need a more detailed analysis (for example if you need to know
with more accuracy than the approach presented here) just look to the original table, which
contains each counter in its standard range in original granularity.
For other vendors, the ranges may be different, but the methodology is always the same.