2013-2014 Hisd Superintendent'S Performance Appraisal Instrument

HISD BOARD OF EDUCATION 20132014
Revisions 11-21-14
20132014 HISD SUPERINTENDENTS PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL INSTRUMENT

Domain/Performance
Goal
I. Rigorous Education
Criteria Descriptor
2011
2012
2012
2013
20132014
Diff from
Prior Yr
Student Achievement--STAAR
Rating
3
Percent of Students at Level III Advanced

Academic Performance STAAR Standard (grades
3-8) Reading
15.2
17.4
15.7
-1.7
Percent of Students at Level II Satisfactory

3-8) Reading
71.2
70.1
68.7
-1.4

3-8) Math
12.4
12.9
16.0
+3.1

3-8) Math
68.2
67.1
68.6
+1.5

5 & 8) Science
10.4
9.8
12.1
+2.3

5 & 8) Science
67.6
66.8
65.1
-1.7

Academic Performance STAAR Standard (grade
8) Social Studies
8.8
8.6
10.1
+1.5
Board Member Comment

1
Ratings Scale:
*3 Performance exceeds expectation, with overall results on indicators for the domain/performance goal exceeding the desired results,
optimizing district goals and priorities.
2 Performance meets expectation, with overall results on indicators for the domain/performance goal meeting desired results,
affecting district goals and priorities in a positive manner.
*1 Performance has not met expectation, with overall results on indicators for the domain/performance goal not meeting desired results.
*A rating of 3 or 1 must be accompanied by a specific explanation under the Comment column.
Page 1

Academic Performance STAAR Standard (grade
8) Social Studies
Revisions 11-21-14
-3.0
52.8
56.5
53.5

Academic Performance STAAR EOC (grades 912) ELA I & II
N/A
N/A
4.9

Academic Performance STAAR EOC (grades 912) ELA I & II
N/A
N/A
53.9

Academic Performance STAAR EOC (grades 912) Algebra I
5.9
5.5
6.6
+1.1

72.7
67.2
68.1
+0.9

Academic Performance STAAR EOC (grades 912) Biology
8.1
10.8
9.4
-1.4

Academic Performance STAAR EOC (grades 912) Biology
83.7
81.4
84.9
+3.5

Academic Performance STAAR EOC (grades 912) U.S. History
1.6
15.8
14.7
-1.1

Academic Performance STAAR EOC (grades 912) U.S. History
49.9
70.2
89.8
+19.6
New metric for 20132014
New metric for 20132014
Ratings Scale:
Page 2
Revisions 11-21-14

39.0
44.0
50.1
+6.1

95.7
97.6
98.6
+1.0
Student AchievementNorm Reference Test
Percent of Students at or above 50

percentile on Norm Reference Test (grades 15) Reading

percentile on Norm Reference Test (grades 15) Math
th
54.7
53.5
51.2
-2.3
62.7
62.1
60.6
-1.5
th

percentile on Norm Reference Test (grades 68) Reading
th
39.5
37.1
37.1
0.0

percentile on Norm Reference Test (grades 68) Math
th
56.2
55.9
53.2
-2.7
Student AchievementEVAAS
Districtwide EVAAS scores in Reading
0.1
0.2
-0.1
-0.3
Districtwide EVAAS scores in Math
-0.9
0.2
0.2
0.0
Ratings Scale:
Page 3
Domain/Performance
Goal
Revisions 11-21-14
Criteria Descriptor
College and Career Readiness
Percent of Students Enrolling in Higher
Education Within 1 Year of High School
Graduation
2011
2012
2012
2013
20132014
Diff from
Prior Yr
Rating
59.5
58.0
-1.5
Lagging Indicator
Lagging Indicator
Percent of Students at or above standard on

the SAT/ACT Reading and Math sections
combined
14.8
14.5
-0.3
Percent of Students at or above benchmark

score on the PSAT
13.6
21.4
20.4
-1.0
Scholarship Dollars Earned by HISD Seniors
Percent of Students Completing at least one

AP/IB/Dual Credit Course
37.5
38.4
+0.9
Lagging Indicator
Percent of Students scoring a 3 on at least

one AP test or a 4 on at least one IB test
37.3
38.3
+1.0
Lagging Indicator
81.7
81.6
-0.1
Lagging Indicator
11.3
11.1
-0.2
Lagging Indicator
Graduation and Dropout

Four-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
Four-Year Cohort Dropout Rate
$180,172,204 $185,191,860 $254,444,881
69,253,021
Ratings Scale:
Page 4
Domain/Performance
Goal
Criteria Descriptor
Perception Survey-Rigorous Education
Percent of Parents Satisfied with Rigorous
Education
II. Consistency
II. Consistency
2011
2012
2012
2013
20132014
Diff from
Prior Yr
NA
92
93
+1
70
70
Percent of Students who Feel challenged with

Coursework
Teachers
Percent of Highly Effective Teachers who are
Retained
Rating
3
87.2
87.6
87.9
+0.3
Percent of Ineffective Teachers who are

Exited
20.3
24.4
25.0
+0.6
Parents
Percent of Parents Satisfied with Consistent
Education
NA
86
88
+2
Principals
Percent of Principals Satisfied with Central
Office Services
NA
64
71
+7
II. Consistency
Revisions 11-21-14
Ratings Scale:
Page 5
Domain/Performance
Goal
III. Safety and
Environment
III. Safety and

Environment
IV. Increase
Management
Effectiveness and
Efficiency
Revisions 11-21-14
Criteria Descriptor
Levels of Offenses
Number of Level III OffensesSuspension/Optional Removal to Disciplinary
Alternative Education
2011
2012
2012
2013
20132014
Diff from
Prior Yr
4987
5,917
5,800
-117
1,173
1,109
1,160
+51
Number of Level IV Offenses-Required

Placement in a disciplinary alternative
Education Program
Number of Level V Offenses-Expulsion for

Serious Offenses
68
53
42
-11
Number of Bullying Incidents
125
139
168
+29
NA
86
90
+4
Perception Survey-Safety and Environment

Percent of Parents Satisfied with Safety
Percent of Students Satisfied with Safety
NA
74
76
+2
Percent of Teachers Satisfied with Safety
NA
77
80
+3
+1
NA
94
95
Percent of Principals Satisfied with Safety
A. Financial Well-Being of the District
The Superintendent ensured the financial well-being of the district through fiscal responsibility
during the annual budget process.
The Superintendent ensured the financial well-being of the district through creative and
innovative approaches to increasing revenue and/or decreasing expenses.
Rating
Ratings Scale:
Page 6
Domain/Performance
Goal
V. Maintains Effective
Relationship with the
Board
Revisions 11-21-14
Criteria Descriptor
2011
2012
2012
2013
20132014
Diff from
Prior Yr
A. Communications with Board

Increase governance efficiency by maintaining effective lines of communication with board
members.
Rating
Base Indicator(s):
The Superintendent ensured that timely and accurate information was made available to
members of the board about major events and developments within the district.
The Superintendent ensured that information presented to the board was both timely and
relevant, was well-organized and succinct, and where appropriate included input from
the board and from the community.
The Superintendent worked equitably and appropriately with individual members of the
board.
2013-2014 HISD Superintendents Performance Appraisal Instrument

Signature:
Signature:
________________________________
________________________________
HISD Superintendent of Schools

_______________________________________
Date
HISD Trustee
_______________________________________
Date
Ratings Scale:
Page 7

2013-2014 Hisd Superintendent'S Performance Appraisal Instrument

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2013-2014 Hisd Superintendent'S Performance Appraisal Instrument

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2013-2014 Hisd Superintendent'S Performance Appraisal Instrument

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

HISD BOARD OF EDUCATION 20132014