0% found this document useful (0 votes)
140 views

Variational Iteration Method For Vibration Problems

The document summarizes the Variational Iteration Method (VIM) for solving vibration problems. It classifies vibration problems into four cases based on the form of the differential operator L: (1) undamped vibration with mass term only, (2) vibration with damping, (3) vibration with spring term only, and (4) vibration with damping and spring terms. For each case, it derives the iteration formula for VIM and identifies the optimal Lagrange multiplier. The method is then applied to problems involving linear/nonlinear, damped/undamped, free/forced vibrations of single-degree-of-freedom systems and beams.

Uploaded by

Usama Perwez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
140 views

Variational Iteration Method For Vibration Problems

The document summarizes the Variational Iteration Method (VIM) for solving vibration problems. It classifies vibration problems into four cases based on the form of the differential operator L: (1) undamped vibration with mass term only, (2) vibration with damping, (3) vibration with spring term only, and (4) vibration with damping and spring terms. For each case, it derives the iteration formula for VIM and identifies the optimal Lagrange multiplier. The method is then applied to problems involving linear/nonlinear, damped/undamped, free/forced vibrations of single-degree-of-freedom systems and beams.

Uploaded by

Usama Perwez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 32

VARIATIONAL ITERATION METHOD FOR VIBRATION PROBLEMS

Metin O. Kaya
Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 34469, Maslak,
Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract
In this study, linear/nonlinear, free/forced and damped/undamped vibrations of both one
degree of freedom and continous systems are discussed by using the Variational Iteration
Method. Additionally, common vibration problems are classified and Lagrange multipliers
are derived for each type of problem.
Keywords: Variational Iteration Method, VIM, Vibration, Lagrange Multiplier, Nonlinear
Vibration

1. Introduction
Vibration of dynamical systems can be divided into two main classes like discrete and
distributed. The variables in discrete systems depend on time only, whereas in distributed
systems such as beams, plates etc. variables depend on time and space. Therefore,
equations of motion of discrete systems are described by ordinary differential equations,
while equations of motion of distributed systems are described by partial differential
equations ( Meirovitch [1] ).

A considerable amount of studies have been made in the area of vibration problems.
Several techniques, such as finite element method, finite difference method, perturbation
techniques, series techniques, etc. have been used to handle vibration problems.
The Variational Iteration Method, VIM, was first proposed by He [2-11] and the method has
been applied to investigate many nonlinear partial differential equations, autonomous and
singular ordinary differential equations such that solitary wave solutions, rational solutions,
compacton solutions and other types of solution were found by Abdou and Soliman [12,
13]. Additonally, He [4, 9] used VIM to solve linear/nonlinear vibration problems.
In this study Hes studies are extended to cover vibration problems with damping, forced
vibration and vibration of beams. Therefore, here VIM is applied to various vibration
problems including vibration of linear/nonlinear, damped/undamped, free/forced vibrations
of one degree of freedom systems and beams as an example of continuous systems. The
procedure presented in this paper can be simply extended to solve more complex vibration
problems; such as aeroelasticity, random vibrations etc.

2. Variational Iteration Method


In order to illustrate the basic concepts of VIM, the following nonlinear partial differential
equation can be considered
Lu ( x, t ) Ru ( x, t ) Nu ( x, t ) g ( x, t )

(1)

where R is a linear operator which has partial derivatives with respect to x , L is the linear
time derivative operator, Nu ( x, t ) is a nonlinear term and g ( x, t ) is an inhomogeneous term.

According to VIM, the following iteration formula can be constructed.


t

un1 ( x, t ) un ( x, t ) Lun Run N un g d

(2)

where is the general Lagrange multiplier which can be identified optimally via
variational theory, Run and N un are considered as restricted variations, i.e. Run 0 ,

N un 0 .

3. Different Form of L Operator


According to the L operator, a general classification of vibration problems can be made as
follows
3.1.

Case I:

Here the following form of the L operator is used

Lm

2
t 2

(3)

Considering Eq. (3), Eq. (1) can be expressed as follows


&
mu&
( x, t ) Ru ( x, t ) Nu( x, t ) g ( x, t )

(4)

The correction functional of Eq. (4) can be written as

un1 ( x, t ) un ( x, t ) mun Run N un g d

(5)

Making the above correction functional stationary, and noticing that u (0) 0 , the
following iteration can be written
t

un1 ( x, t ) un ( x, t ) mun Run N un g d

(6a)

un (t ) m ( ) un ( ) t m ( ) un ( ) t m un d 0

(6b)

which yields the following stationary conditions:


m 0

(7a)

1 m t 0

(7b)

(7c)

Therefore, in this case the Lagrange multiplier can be identified as follows

3.2.

1
( t )
m

(8)

Case II:

Here the following form of the L operator is used

Lm

c
2
t
t

(9)

Considering Eq. (9), Eq. (1) can be expressed as follows


&
mu&
( x, t ) cu&( x, t ) Ru ( x, t ) Nu( x, t ) g ( x, t )
Here Eq. (10) denotes vibration with damping where

(10)

c is the damping coefficient and m

is the mass.
The correction functional of Eq. (10) can be written as
t

un1 ( x, t ) un ( x, t ) mun Run N un g d

(11)

Making the above correction functional stationary, and noticing that u (0) 0 , the
following iteration can be written
t

un1 ( x, t ) un ( x, t ) mun cu Run Nun g d

(12a)

un (t ) m ( ) un ( ) t [c m ( )] un ( ) t ( m c ) un d 0 (12b)
0

which yields the following stationary conditions


m c 0

(13a)

1 m c

(13b)

(13c)

Combining Eqs. (13b) and (13c), Eqs. (13a)-(13c) can be rewritten as follows
m c 0

(14a)

1 m t 0

(14b)

(14c)

Therefore, in this case the Lagrange multiplier can be identified as follows


1 mc ( t )
[e
1]
c

(15)

Approximate Lagrange multiplier can be obtained simply by expanding Eq. (15) as follows
1 mc ( t )
1
c
c2
2
[e
1] ( t )
(

t
)

( t ) 3
c
m
2! m2
3! m3

(16)

Hence,

3.3.

1
c
c2
2
( t )
(

t
)

( t ) 3
2
3
m
2! m
3! m

(17)

Case III:

Here the following form of the L operator is used

Lm

2
k
t 2

(18)

Considering Eq. (18), Eq. (1) can be expressed as follows


&
mu&
( x, t ) ku( x, t ) Ru ( x, t ) Nu ( x, t ) g ( x, t )

(19)

whre k is the spring coefficient.


The correction functional of Eq. (19) can be written as
t

un1 ( x, t ) un ( x, t ) mun kun Run N un g d

(20)

Making the above correction functional stationary, and noticing that u (0) 0 , the
following iteration can be written
t

un1 ( x, t ) un ( x, t ) mun ku Run N un g d

(21a)

un (t ) m ( ) un ( ) t m ( ) un ( ) t ( m k ) un d 0

(21b)

which yields the following stationary conditions


m k 0

(22a)

1 m t 0

(22b)

(22c)

Therefore, in this case the Lagrange multiplier can be identified as follows

1
sin ( t )
m

where the circular frequency,

(23)

, is given by

k
.
m

(24)

Approximate Lagrange multiplier can be obtained simply by expanding Eq. (23) as follows
1
( t ) 2 ( t )3
sin ( t )

m
m
3! m

(25)

Hence,

( t ) 2 ( t ) 3

m
3! m

3.4.

(26)

Case IV:

Here the following form of the L operator is used

Lm

c k
2
t
t

(27)

Considering Eq. (27), Eq. (1) can be expressed as follows

&
mu&
( x, t ) cu&( x, t ) ku ( x, t ) Ru ( x, t ) Nu ( x, t ) g ( x, t )

(28)

The correction functional of Eq. (28) can be written as


t

un1 ( x, t ) un ( x, t ) mun cu ku Run N un g d

(29)

Making the above correction functional stationary, and noticing that u (0) 0 , the
following iteration can be written
t

un1 ( x, t ) un ( x, t ) mun cu ku Run N un g d

(30a)

un (t ) m ( ) un ( ) t [c m ( )] un ( ) t ( m c k ) un d 0

(30b)

which yields the following stationary conditions


m c k 0

(31a)

1 m c

(31b)

(31c)

Combining Eqs. (31b) and (31c), Eqs. (31a)-(31c) can be rewritten as follows
m c k 0

(32a)

1 m t 0

(32b)

(32c)

Therefore, in this case the Lagrange multiplier can be identified as follows


Sin[ ( t )] 2cm ( t )
e
m

(33)

where
4mk c 2
2m

(34)

Approximate Lagrange multiplier can be obtained simply by expanding Eq. (34) as follows

Sin[ ( t )] 2cm ( t ) ( t ) c( t ) 2
1 c 2 k
3
e

2 ( t )
2
m
2m
3! m m m
m

(35)

Hence,
( t ) c( t ) 2

1 c 2 k
3

2 ( t )
2
2m
3! m m m
m

4. Illustrative Examples

10

(36)

EXAMPLE 1:
In this example, a simple mass-spring system that undergoes forced vibration is examined.
The differential equation of motion of this system is given by
&
& ky f (t )
my

(37)

where f (t ) F0 cos(t )
Dividing both sides by

m , Eq.(37) can be rewritten as follows

&
y& 2 y F0 cos(t )

where F0

(38)

F0
.
m

Here it is easily seen that the Lagrange multiplier of this problem is

1
sin ( t )
m

(39)

Additionally, the iteration formula of this problem is


t

1
yn1 (t ) yn (t )
sin ( t ) [ my ( ) ky ( ) f ( )]d
m 0

(40)

The complementary solution of this problem is given by


y0 A cos t B sin t

(41)

11

Using Eq. (41) as an initial approximation, we get


t

1
sin ( t ) [ F0 cos( )]d
0

(42)

F0 cos t F0 cos t
2
2 2
2

(43)

y1 (t ) A cos t B sin t

or

y1 t A cos t B sin t

Since the last term in Eq. (43) automatically satisfies the complementary equation, this term
will not be used. Thus, Eq. (43) can be simplified to

y1 (t ) A cos t B sin t

F0 cos(t )
2 2

(44)

which is the general solution of Eq. (37).


In order to point out the importance of using the exact Lagrange multiplier instead of the
approximate one, the following multiplier may be considered

( t )
m

(45)

Considering Eq. (45), the following iteration expression can be written


t

yn1 (t ) yn (t ) ( t )[ y ( ) 2 y ( )
0

f ( )
]d
m

(46)

If we use the complementary solution given by Eq.(41) as an initial approximation, we get

12

y1 (t ) A cos t B sin t ( t )[ F0 cos( )]d

(47a)

or in compact form
y1 A cos t B sin t F0 [

1 Cos(t )
]
2

(47b)

and

y2 A cos t B sin t F0 [

2
2Cos( )
1 Cos(t )
]

t
)
F

Cos
(

F0 cos( ) d

0
2
2

(48a)

or in compact form
1 2

1 2
2t 2

F
Cos
(

t
)

F
0
0

2
4
2
4
2 2

y2 A cos t B sin t F0

(48b)

In the same way, y 4 can be written as follows


1 2 4 6
1
2 4 6

F
cos

0
2 4 6 8
2
4
6
8

y4 A cos t B sin t F0

F0 2 t 2
2

1
2 4
2 4 6

F0 4 t 4
24

1
2
2 4

F0 6 t 6 1

720 2

(49)

Since,
1
1 2 4 6

L
2 2 2 4 6 8

(50)

13

The expression for yn can be written as follows

yn A cos t B sin t

F0Cos(t )
F0
2t 2 4t 4 F0 6t 6

L
2
2
2
2


2
24
720

(51)

As n , the compact form of solution becomes

y (t ) A cos t B sin t

F0 [cos(t ) cos( t )]
2 2

(52)

Note that Eq. (52) is the same as Eq. (47b).


If we use a different approximate form of the Lagrange multiplier, , such as

( t ) 2 ( t ) 3

m
3! m

(53)

the following iteration expression can be written


t

yn1 (t ) yn (t ) [( t )
0

2 ( t )3
f ( )
][ y ( ) 2 y ( )
]d
3!
m

(54)

Again using the complementary solution given by Eq.(41) as an initial approximation, we


get
t

2 ( t )3
y1 (t ) A cos t B sin t [( t )
][ F0 cos( )]d
3!
0
or in compact form

14

(55a)

1 2

1 2
2t 2

F
Cos
(

t
)

F
0
0

2
4
2
4
2 2

y1 A cos t B sin t F0

(55b)

and
1 2 4 6
1
2 4 6

F
cos

0
2 4 6 8
2
4
6
8

y2 A cos t B sin t F0

F0 2 t 2
2

1
2 4 F 4t 4
2 4 6 0
24

1
2 F 6t 6 1
2 4 0

720 2

It can be easily seen that approximate Lagrange multiplier

converges faster than

(56)

( t ) 2 ( t ) 3

m
3! m

( t )
.
m

EXAMPLE 2:
In this example, a damped mass-spring system that undergoes forced vibration is examined.
The differential equation of motion of this system is given by
&
& cy& ky F0 cos(t )
my

(57)

The Lagrange multiplier of this problem is

Sin[ ( t )] 2cm ( t )
e
m

(58)

where

15

4mk c 2

2m

(59)

Hence using this Lagrange multiplier, the iteration formula can be written as
t

yn1 (t ) yn (t )

c
( t )
1
2m
e
Sin[ ( t )][ my ( ) cy ( ) ky ( ) f ( )]d

m 0

Dividing both sides of Eq. (57) by

(60)

m , the following equation of motion is obtained

&
y& 2 y& 2 y F0 cos(t )

(61)

where

F0

F0
c
.
and
m
2m

Therefore, Eq. (60) becomes


t

yn1 (t ) yn (t )

1 2cm ( t )
e
Sin[ ( t )] y ( ) 2 y ( ) 2 y ( ) F0 cos( ) d

(62)

and

1 2

(63)

The complementary solution of this problem is given by


y0 A cos t B sin t e t

(64)

16

Taking this complementary solution as an initial approximation, the following expression is


obtained
t

y1 (t ) y0 (t )

1 2cm ( t )
e
Sin[ ( t )][ F0 cos( )]d
0

(65)

Integrating the second term of Eq. (65), we get


( 2 2 )Cos[t ] 2Sin[t ]
y1 (t ) y0 (t )
4 2(2 2 1) 2 2 4

( 2 2 )Cos[ t ]e t
( 2 2 ) Sin[ t ]et

4 2(2 2 1) 2 2 4 4 2(2 2 1) 2 2 4 1 2

(66)

Since the last two terms of Eq. (66) automatically satisfy the homogeneous equation, they
will not be used. The second term of Eq. (66) can be written in a more compact form as
follows
( 2 2 )Cos[t ] 2Sin[t ]

4 2(2 2 1) 2 2 4

Cos(t )

/ 2 2 /
2

(67)

where

tan( )

2 /
1 2 / 2

(68)

Hence, the exact solution of Eq. (57) is obtained after one iteration

17

y1 A cos t B sin t et

F0Cos(t )

/ 2 2 /
2

(69)

EXAMPLE 3:
In this example, transverse vibration of a uniform beam with simply supported ends is
examined. The differential equation of motion of this system is given by
4
2 y
2 y

c
0, 0 x L , t > 0
t 2
x 4

(70)

The initial and the boundary conditions for this problem are as follows:

y ( x,0) sin

x
L

(71a)

y t ( x,0) 0

(71b)

y (0, t ) 0

(71c)

y ( L, t ) 0

(71d)

y xx (0, t ) 0

(71e)

y xx ( L, t ) 0

(71f)

y t ( x,0) 0 , y xx (0, t ) 0
The Lagrange multiplier of this problem is

18

It is easily noticed that the Lagrange multiplier of this problem is

1
( t )
m

(72)

Using this Lagrange multiplier, the iteration formula can be written as


t

yn1 (t ) yn (t )

1
( t )[ y c 2 y xxxx ]d

m0

(73)

The complementary solution of this problem is given by

y0 (t ) sin

x
L

(74)

Using the iteration formula given by Eq. (73) and taking the complementary solution as an
initial approximation, we get
t

y1 (t ) sin

2 4 2
c 2 4
x 1
x
( t ) 4 sin d sin x c 4t sin x
L m0
L
L
2L
L
L

(75)

and

y2 (t ) sin

t
c 2 4 x 2 4
x c 2 4t 2 x 1
x c 2 8 2
x

sin

t
)

sin

c
sin

sin d
4

8
4
4

L
2L
L
L
2L
L m0
L
L

sin

x c 2 4 t 2
x c 4 8t 4
x

sin

sin
4
8
L
2! L
L
4! L
L

Hence the expression for yn can be written as follows

19

(76)

yn (t ) sin

2n 4n 2n
x
c 2 4 t 2 c 4 8t 4
n c t
1

L
(

1)

L
2! L4
4! L8
(2n)! L4 n

(77)

Thus we have,

lim yn (t ) sin
n

x
2 ct
cos 2
L
L

(78)

which is the exact solution.


EXAMPLE 4:
In this example, transverse vibration of a variable coefficient beam that was studied by
Wazwaz [14] is considered. The differential equation of motion of this system is given by
2 y
4 y

(
x
)
f ( x, t ) , ( x ) 0 , 0 x L , t > 0
t 2
x 4

(79)

Here it can be that the equation of motion of the beam is as follows:


2 y
4 y
6

(1

x
)
( x 4 x 3 )cos t
2
4
t
x
7!

(80)

The initial and the boundary conditions for this problem are as follows:

y ( x,0)

6 7
x ,
7!

y t ( x,0) 0 ,

0 x 1

(81a)

0 x 1

(81b)

20

y (0, t ) 0 .
6
cos t ,
7!

y (1, t )

y xx (0, t ) 0 ,

y xx (1, t )

1
cos t ,
20

t>0

(81c)

t>0

(81d)

t>0

(81e)

t>0

(81f)

The Lagrange multiplier of this problem is

1
( t )
m

and m 1 for this problem. Hence the iteration formula can be written as
t

yn1 (t ) yn (t ) ( t )[ y (1 x ) y xxxx ( x 4 x 3
0

6
)cos ]d
7!

(82)

The complementary solution of this problem that is used as an initial approximation is


given by

y0 (t )

6 7
x cos t ( x 3 x 4 )(1 cos t )
7!

(83)

By using the iteration expression given by Eq. (82) and the initial approximation given by
Eq. (83), we get

y1 (t )

6 7
x cos t ( x 3 x 4 )(1 cos t ) (1 x)(24 12t 2 x 3 (24 x 3 )cos t
7!

21

(84a)

or in compact form
x7
24 x 24)cos t
7!

(84b)

x7
y2 (t ) 12(t 2)(1 x) ( 24 x 24)cos t 12(1 x)(t 2 2 2cos t )
7!

(85)

y1 (t ) 12(t 2 2)(1 x ) (

and

Eq. (85) can be simplified to the following expression

y2 ( t )

x7
cos t
7!

(86)

As it is seen, the exact solution of this problem is obtained quickly in two iteration.
EXAMPLE 5:
In this example, Mathematical Pendulum that was studied by He [4, 9] is considered.
The differential equation of motion of the undamped mathematical pendulum is given by,
&
y& 2 sin y 0

(87)

The initial conditions for this problem are as follows:


y (0) A

(88a)

y&(0) 0

(88b)

22

The Siny term in Eq. (87) is a nonlinear term and it can be expanded as

sin y y

1 3
y
6

(89)

Substituting Eq. (89) into Eq. (87) gives

&
y& 2 y

2 3
y 0
6

(90)

A more detailed form of this mathematical pendulum was investigated by He [5, 7].
The Lagrange multiplier of this problem is

1
sin ( t )

(91)

Hence the iteration formula is


t

1
2 3
yn1 (t ) yn (t ) sin ( t ) [ y ( ) 2 y ( )
y ( )]d
0
6

(92)

The complementary solution of this problem that is used as an initial approximation is


given by
y0 (t ) A cos( t )

(93)

where is an unknown constant.


Substituting the initial approximation into Eq. (90), the following residual is obtained

23

R0 (t ) &
y& 2 y

2 3
1
1 3 2
y A(1 A2 2 ) 2 cos(t )
A cos(3t )
6
8
24

(94)

The coefficient of the cos( t ) term is set to zero in order to eliminate the secular term
which may occur in the next iteration. Doing so, the expression of is found as follows
A2
1
8

(95)

Hence,

y1 (t ) A cos t

A3
(cos3 t cos t )
24(9 2 1) 2

(96)

with defined in Eq. (95).


The period can be expressed as follows

2
1
1 A2
8

If A

(97)

, then T 1.20T0 . On the other hand Hes [4, 9] approximation gives T 1.17T0 ,
2

while the exact period is Tex 1.16T0 , where T0 2 / .

24

EXAMPLE 6:
In this example, the problem that was studied by Nayfeh and Mook [15] is considered.
The differential equation of motion is given by,
& 2u u 2u&
& 0
u&

(98)

The initial conditions for this problem are as follows:


y (0) A

(99a)

y&(0) 0

(99b)

The Lagrange multiplier of this problem is

1
sin ( t )

(100)

The iteration formula is given by


t

un1 (t ) un (t )

1
sin ( t ) [u ( ) 2u( ) u 2 ( )u ( )]d

(101)

The complementary solution of this problem that is used as an initial approximation is


given by
u0 (t ) A cos( t )

(102)

where is an unknown constant.

25

Substituting the initial approximation given by Eq. (102), the following residual is obtained
as follows

& 2u u 2u&
& A 2 (1 2
R0 (t ) u&

3 2
1
A )cos(t ) A3 2 2 cos(3 t )
4
4

(103)

The coefficient of the cos( t ) term is set to zero in order to eliminate the secular term
which may occur in the next iteration. Doing so, the expression for

is obtained as

follows

(104)

4 3 A2

Hence,

y1 (t ) A cos t

A3 2
(cos t cos3t )
4(9 2 1)

(105)

with defined in Eq. (104).


The new frequency is defined as follows

2
4 3 A2

(106)

The frequency that is obtained by Nayfeh and Mook [15] using the perturbation method is
3
1 (1 A2 )
8

(107)

26

Note that Eq. (107) is valid only for small values. However, the frequency expression
given by Eq. (106) is valid for all values and takes the following form for small values
3
27 2 4
1 1 A2
A L
8
128

(108)

EXAMPLE 7:
In this example, the Duffing-harmonic oscillator that was studied by Lim and Wu [16] and
Mickens [17] is considered.
The differential equation of motion is given by,
d2 y
y3

0
dt 2 1 y 2

(109)

The initial conditions for this problem are as follows:


y (0) A

(110a)

y&(0) 0

(110b)

with initial conditions y (0) A and y&(0) 0 .


For small y values, Eq. (109) reduces to
d2 y
y3 ; 0
dt 2
(111a)

27

On the other hand, for large y values, Eq. (109) reduces to


d2 y
y; 0
dt 2
(111b)
Considering Eqs. (111a) and (111b) respectively, it is noticed that for small y values, Eq.
(109) reduces to the equation of motion of the Duffing-type nonlinear oscillator while for
large y values, it reduces to the equation of motion of a linear harmonic oscillator.
Therefore, Eq. (109) is called as Duffing-harmonic oscillator equation of motion.
The following form of Eq. (109) is going to be studied in this example

(1 y 2 )

d2 y
y3 0
dt 2

(112)
Hes technique is going to be used to overcome seculer terms that appear in the iterations.
The initial approximation is,
y0 (t ) A cos( t )

(113)

where is an unknown constant.


Substituting the initial approximation into Eq. (112), the following residual is obtained
3
3
A3
R0 (t ) (1 y 2 ) &
y& y 3 ( A2 2 A2 2 )cos( t )
(1 2 )cos(3 t )
4
4
4

28

(114)

In oreder to discard the seculer terms, the coefficient of cos( t ) is set to zero which gives
the expression of as follows
3 2
A
4

3
1 A2
4

(115)

Hence the new frequency is defined as follows


3 2
A
4

3
1 A2
4

(116)

which is the same with the one found by Lim and Wu [16] and Mickens [17].
The iteration formula is given by
t

u1 (t ) u0 (t ) ( t )[
0

A3
(1 2 )cos(3 )]d
4

(117)

Hence,

y1 (t ) cos t

A
(cos3 t 1)
27

(118)

with defined in Eq. (116).


For small values of amplitude A, the frequency expression given in Eq. (116) is expressed
as follows

29

3
A
4

(119a)

Additionally, for large values of amplitude A, the frequency expression given in Eq. (116)
is expressed as follows

;1

(119b)

which agree with the approximations made for the equations of motion given in Eqs. (111a)
and (111b).

5. Conclusion
In thispaper, which extends Hes studies , various types of vibration problems including
vibration of linear/nonlinear, damped/undamped, free/forced vibrations of one degree of
freedom systems and beams as an example of continuous systems are solved using the
Variational Iteration Method. Lagrange multipliers which arise from different types of
vibration problems are presented and the solutions are made in a detailed way. Additionally,
the procedure presented in this paper can be simply extended to solve more complex
vibration problems; such as aeroelasticity, random vibrations etc.

30

REFERENCES
[1] L. Meirovitch, Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics, Sijthoff & Noordhoff
International Publishers, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands, 1980
[2] J. He, A New Approach to Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, Communications in
Nonlinear Science & Numerical Simulation, Vo1.2, No.4 (Dec. 1997), 230-235.
[3] J.H. He, Approximate analytical solution for seepage flow with fractional derivatives in
porous media, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 167 (1998) 5768.
[4] J.H. He, Approximate solution of nonlinear differential equations with convolution
product nonlinearities, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 167 (1998) 6973.
[5] J.H. He, Variational iteration methoda kind of non-linear analytical technique: some
examples, Internat. J. Nonlinear Mech. 34 (1999) 699708.
[6] J.H. He, Variational iteration method for autonomous ordinary differential systems,
Appl. Math. Comput. 114 (2000) 115123.
[7] J. He, Homotopy perturbation method: a new nonlinear analytical technique, Applied
Mathematics and Computation 135 (2003) 7379.
[8] J.H. He, The homotopy perturbation method for nonlinear oscillators with
discontinuities, Appl. Math. Comput. 151 (2004) 287292.

31

[9] J.H. He, A generalized variational principle in micromorphic thermoelasticity, Mech.


Res. Comm. 32 (1) (2005) 9398.
[10] J.H. He, Some asymptotic methods for strongly nonlinearly equations, Internat. J.
Modern Math. 20 (10) (2006) 11411199.
[11] J.H. He, Variational iteration methodSome recent results and new interpretations,
J. Comput. Appl. Math. in press doi:10.1016/j.cam.2006.07.009.
[12] M.A. Abdou, A.A. Soliman, New applications of variational iteration method, Physica
D 211 (2005) 18.
[13] M.A. Abdou, A.A. Soliman, Variational iteration method for solving Burgers and
coupled Burgers equations J. Comput. Appl. Math. 181 (2005) 245251.
[14] A. M. Wazwaz, Analytic treatment for variable coefficient fourth-order parabolic
partial differential equation, Appl. Math. Comput. 123 (2001) 219-227.
[15] A. H. Nayfeh and D. T. Mook, Nonlinear Oscillation, John Wiley & Sons, 1979
[16] C.W. Lim and B.S. Wu, A new analytical approach to the Duffing-harmonic oscillator,
Physics Letters A 311 (2003) 365373
[17] R. E. Mickens, Mathematical and Numerical Study of the Duffing Harmonic
Oscillator, Journal of Sound and Vibration (2001) 244(3), 563-567.

32

You might also like