Tribal Militias - An Effective Tool To Counter Al-Quaida and Its Affiliates
Tribal Militias - An Effective Tool To Counter Al-Quaida and Its Affiliates
Tribal Militias - An Effective Tool To Counter Al-Quaida and Its Affiliates
PRESS
Carlisle Barracks, PA and
TRIBAL MILITIAS:
AN EFFECTIVE TOOL TO COUNTER AL-QAIDA
AND ITS AFFILIATES?
U.S. ARMY WAR COLLEGE
Norman Cigar
The United States Army War College
The United States Army War College educates and develops leaders for service
at the strategic level while advancing knowledge in the global application
of Landpower.
The purpose of the United States Army War College is to produce graduates
who are skilled critical thinkers and complex problem solvers. Concurrently,
it is our duty to the U.S. Army to also act as a think factory for commanders
and civilian leaders at the strategic level worldwide and routinely engage
in discourse and debate concerning the role of ground forces in achieving
national security objectives.
U.S. Army War College The Senior Leader Development and Resiliency program
SLDR
supports the United States Army War Colleges lines of
effort to educate strategic leaders and provide well-being
Senior Leader Development and Resiliency education and support by developing self-awareness
through leader feedback and leader resiliency.
The Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) is part of the U.S. Army War
College and is the strategic-level study agent for issues related
to national security and military strategy with emphasis on
geostrategic analysis.
TRIBAL MILITIAS:
AN EFFECTIVE TOOL TO COUNTER AL-QAIDA
AND ITS AFFILIATES?
Norman Cigar
November 2014
The views expressed in this report are those of the author and
do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the
Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S.
Government. Authors of Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) and
U.S. Army War College (USAWC) Press publications enjoy full
academic freedom, provided they do not disclose classified
information, jeopardize operations security, or misrepresent
official U.S. policy. Such academic freedom empowers them to
offer new and sometimes controversial perspectives in the inter-
est of furthering debate on key issues. This report is cleared for
public release; distribution is unlimited.
*****
iii
*****
*****
*****
*****
iv
*****
ISBN 1-58487-644-1
v
FOREWORD
vii
be studied within that perspective, as Al-Qaida has
a vote in the ensuing struggle as it attempts to adapt.
Dr. Cigar focuses on the experience in Iraq and Ye-
men, but some lessons learned may be applicable more
broadly. While the positive results may be significant,
as in the case of Iraq and Yemen, there are cautionary
guidelines to be drawn from past experience for the
creation and functioning of such tribal militias that
could mark the difference between success or ultimate
failure, including balancing the local governments
dilemma between encouraging an effective counter to
Al-Qaida and managing the threat from such autono-
mous forces in the long run.
This monograph notes a number of lessons learned
for the United States while acting as the direct man-
aging patron of these groups. Among them are the
following:
to understand the strengths and limitations of
tribal militias and shape the latters roles and
missions accordingly;
to support a tribal militia adequately in mate-
rial terms;
to provide effective protection for key tribal mi-
litia leaders;
to ensure that the U.S. management and use of
tribal militias do not undercut an existing or
emerging governments legitimacy;
to craft a realistic and effective demobilization
plan; and to conduct an effective information
campaign directed toward the parent tribes.
viii
providing funding, arms, selected operational
support, and intelligence;
advising the local government on how to best
deal with the tribal militias; and,
advising and supporting other countries that
might act in the future as potential patrons of
tribal militias.
ix
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
xi
the Middle East Institute, Columbia University; and
an M.S.S.I. from the National Intelligence University.
xii
SUMMARY
xiii
political environment, tribal militias are no panacea,
but can be a two-edged sword. Like any weapon, the
use of tribal militias has to be understood and wielded
with caution and skill in order to avoid unintended
consequences.
This discussion includes two models for the tribal
militias based on the nature of their patron. In Model
1, the patron of a militia is an outside entity; in Model
2, the national government is the patron (although an
outside entity may provide ancillary support). The
first case study deals with a Model 1 situation, where
a foreign patronthe United Statesacted in that role
in Iraq beginning in late-2006 and lasting through the
hand-over to Iraqi authorities during the period from
December 2008 to April 2009. The second case study
deals with two ongoing Model 2 situations, again with
Iraq, but taking place after the national governments
assumption of responsibility for the tribal militia in
2009. This case study is especially useful for compara-
tive purposes with the first case study. The third case
study deals with Yemen, where the local government
has acted as the militia patron since 2012.
Based on the experience from Iraq and Yemen, this
monograph concludes that the positive results of us-
ing tribal militias in the fight against Al-Qaida and
its offshoots may be significant. Within the context
of fighting against Al-Qaida, encouraging and sup-
porting any armed local constituencysuch as Iraqs
tribesmay be a reasonable or even an unavoidable
option at a particular juncture in time for an outside
power or for a local patron in dealing with that insur-
gency. Nevertheless, as is often true in the real world,
this is not a panacea and, based on past experience,
there are cautionary guidelines to be remembered for
the creation and functioning of such tribal militias that
xiv
could make the difference between success or ultimate
failure. Each of the two models studied has political
and military advantages and disadvantages, but one
may not have the luxury of which option to select in a
specific situation.
Among the recommendations for policy in those
situations where the United States is a tribal militias
direct patron are to:
understand the strengths and limitations of
tribal militias and shape the latters roles and
missions accordingly;
support a tribal militia adequately in material
terms;
provide effective protection for key tribal mili-
tia leaders from inevitable Al-Qaida efforts to
eliminate them;
ensure that the U.S. management and use of
tribal militias do not undercut an existing or
emerging governments legitimacy;
craft a realistic and effective demobilization
plan; and,
conduct an effective information campaign
directed toward the tribes.
xv
TRIBAL MILITIAS:
AN EFFECTIVE TOOL TO COUNTER AL-QAIDA
AND ITS AFFILIATES?
INTRODUCTION
1
might present unfavorable conditions for a significant
U.S. Landpower footprint. At the same time, given the
complexity of the local political environment, tribal
militias are no panacea, but can be a two-edged sword
and, like any weapon, this weapon has to be under-
stood and wielded with caution and skill in order to
avoid unintended consequences.
2
The focus is on dealing with insurgent groups in-
spired by Al-Qaida, even if they are not always con-
trolled by the traditional Al-Qaida leadership. In that
context, a clarification may be in order for the terms
identifying these organizations as used here. In Iraq,
the main jihadist organization has been through a
number of name changes since its appearance in that
country under the leadership of Abu Musab Al-Zarqa-
wi in 2003 as the Monotheism and Jihad Group (Jamaat
Al-Tawhid wal-Jihad). The group was renamed Al-
Qaida in Mesopotamia (Al-Qaida fi Bilad Al-Rafidayn)
in 2004 when Al-Zarqawi adhered formally to Usama
Bin Ladin as leader of Al-Qaida. In October 2006, the
Islamic State of Iraq (Dawlat Al-Iraq Al-Islamiya, or ISI)
was proclaimed, although still maintaining at least
nominal loyalty to Al-Qaidas central leadership.
In the wake of the Arab Spring, it was ISI that oper-
ated with delegated authority from Al-Qaida Central
(by that time led by Ayman Al-Zawahiri), in Syria be-
ginning in January 2012 through its creation, Jabhat
Al-Nusra. However, the announcement by Abu Bakr
Al-Husayni Al-Qurayshi Al-Baghdadi, head of ISI,
on April 9, 2013, to the effect that he was establishing
a joint Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (Al-Dawla Al-
Islamiya fi Al-Iraq wal-Sham or ISIS), revealed openly
the sharp differences over command relationships be-
tween the two adjoining theaters and with Al-Qaida
Centrals leadership.1 Rejecting this initiative, Al-Za-
wahiri disowned the ISIS. With the beginning of Ra-
madan at the very end of June 2014, ISIS changed its
name once again when it proclaimed itself the Islamic
State (Al-Dawla Al-Islamiya), calling itself the Rightly-
Guided Caliphate (Al-Khilafa Al-Rashida). Neverthe-
less, despite Al-Zawahiris repudiation, Al-Baghdadi
has continued to lay claim to Bin Ladins mantle of
3
leadership, and it may be a moot point as to which
of the twoAl-Zawahiri or Al-Baghdadis organiza-
tionnow represents the Al-Qaida legacy.
Clearly, thanks to its success on the ground, ISIS
has gained momentum and widespread recognition
within Al-Qaida jihadist circles, and many promi-
nent Al-Qaida figures now support it over a more
isolated and contained Al-Zawahiri. Moreover, apart
from Jabhat Al-Nusras own website, only one of the
traditional Al-Qaida websitesa key element in Al-
Qaidas political outreach, legitimacy, and command
and control systemstill sides with Al-Zawahiri, as
all the others by mid-2014 recognized and supported
ISIS or, at best, remained silent on the split. In that
sense, ISIS is still Al-Qaida, whether Al-Zawahiri
recognizes it as such or not. In this study, depending
on the time period in question, the terms Al-Qaida/ISI
are used when dealing with the earlier phase and ISIS
when dealing with the more recent phase, although
for practical purposes, the discussion is applicable to
the broader Al-Qaida phenomenon.
In Yemen, the organization Al-Qaida in the Arabi-
an Peninsula (Al-Qaida fi Al-Jazira Al-Arabiya) had re-
sulted from the 2009 merger of Al-Qaidas branches in
Saudi Arabia and Yemen. Under that name, Al-Qaida
had already been battling against the Yemeni Army
for several years by the time the Arab Spring broke
out in Sanaa in early-2011. As was the case elsewhere
in the Arab World, a new organizationthe Support-
ers of the Law (Ansar Al-Sharia)also appeared in
Yemen although, even more clearly than elsewhere,
there was in practice little substantive change, as the
Ansar Al-Sharia were essentially part of Al-Qaida us-
ing a new name. In fact, very often it was impossible
even for the Yemenis to differentiate between the two
4
names. In this monograph, the generic name Al-Qaida
will be used for the organization in Yemen.
Three case studies will serve as the database and
provide the context needed to understand the role of
the tribal militias and the other players. The first case
study deals with a Model 1 situation, where a foreign
patronthe United Statesacted in that role in Iraq
from late-2006 through the December 2008-April 2009
period when responsibility was handed over to the
Iraqi authorities. The second case study deals with a
two Model 2 situation, again with Iraq, but in a Phase II,
after the national governments assumption of respon-
sibility for the tribal militia in 2009. This case study is
especially useful for comparison with the earlier phase.
The third case study deals with Yemen, where the local
government has acted as the militia patron since 2012.
Of course, the Yemeni and the Iraqi situations are on-
going, with the potential for evolution, but the general
lines of development as identified here should provide
sufficient information for an appreciation of the militia
experience.2
Iraq and Yemen are both tribal societies, although
in different ways. Since the retribalization of soci-
ety for political reasons under Saddam Hussein in the
1990s, tribes have become an increasingly significant
factor in Iraqi society, and even 80 percent of the ur-
ban population now is said to have a tribal allegiance.3
In Yemen, tribes are perhaps the dominant political
players in the country, and one can view even the
Yemeni government itself as tribally-based to a sig-
nificant extent, relying on certain in-tribes, which is
reflected in the composition of the military, police, bu-
reaucracy, and funding for specific tribal regions. Iraqi
tribal society is further complicated by sectarian and
ethnic divisions between Sunni and Shia Arabs and
5
Sunni and Shia Kurds. Yemeni tribes, too, are divided
between Sunni and various branches of the Shia.
Not surprisingly, the militias raised in both Iraq
and Yemen to counter Al-Qaida have been essentially
tribally-based both in terms of organization and per-
sonnel. To be sure, at times their name may not des-
ignate them as being tribal, with the substitution
of a euphemism intended to suggest a more modern
organization rather than one based on a tribe, since a
tribal label may carry a stigma in international circles
or among local intellectuals. In Iraq, officially such mi-
litias have been known as the Awakening (Sahwa, or
the plural Sahwat)as well as Sons of Iraq and other
names. However, the Iraqi media, in a nod to reality,
at times also uses the term Tribal Sahwa (Al-Sahwa
Al-Ashairiya). In Yemen, the militias are most often
known as Popular Committees (Al-Lijan Al-Shabiya)
but here, again, the local media and participants are
not shy about using the term Tribal Committees
(Al-Lijan Al-Qabaliya).
Tribal militias do not exist in a vacuum: a coun-
trys tribal fabric, the character of a government, and
Al-Qaidas overall relationship with the tribes provide
the necessary background for understanding the trib-
al militias functioning. In fact, the local government
(or a foreign patron), the tribes, and Al-Qaida are all
active players with their own interests, objectives, and
strategies, and are forces that interact and seek to ma-
nipulate the other actors, thus forming an unstable tri-
angular relationship. In this respect, it is particularly
important to appreciate the vulnerabilities that Al-Qa-
ida faces in dealing with tribes in general, vulnerabili-
ties that are an inherent dilemma for Al-Qaida, as the
latter is often caught between implementing its ideo-
logical and political program and dealing with social
6
realitiesand is a situation that is likely to generate
conflict, as will be seen in the succeeding case studies.
MODEL 1
7
Arguably, at the same time, Al-Qaida created its
own unique critical vulnerabilities in Iraq by alienat-
ing the tribes and making them amenable to cooperat-
ing with U.S. forces. While, to some extent, aspects of
Al-Qaidas policy were attributable to its ideological
underpinnings of the organization as a whole, a more
important factor was how the branch operating in
Iraq chose to implement such principles in a range of
practical situations.
Under its then-leader Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi, the
local Al-Qaida clashed increasingly with tribal society
by seeking to impose a strict interpretation of Sharia,
or religious law, bolstered by religious courts hand-
ing down harsh sentences, in place of the traditional,
more flexible, tribal law. Among the consequences
of the enforcement of the Sharia were personal con-
trols, such as banning music, shaving, and smoking,
and restricting the role of women in public, as well
as suppressing well-established elements of folk reli-
gionsuch as invoking the intercession of saints or
celebrating Muhammads birthday (the mulid)and
interfering with marriage traditions. The high visibil-
ity of foreigners among Al-Qaidas leadership in Iraq,
and the shunting aside of local clerics, only served as
an additional irritant among the tribesmen, who are
traditionally suspicious of outsiders. The violation of
such tribal cultural values was felt as an unpardon-
able humiliation and, as one prominent shaykh, or
tribal chief, put it, Al-Qaidas intent was to trample on
the tribes cherished values, that is to do away with
social custom (urf ijtimai) . . . that was the real goal of
cutting off heads.4
Al-Qaida also insisted on a monopoly of control
in the insurgency, either edging out or attacking com-
peting armed groups, as well as being in the habit of
8
launching indiscriminate attacks that often resulted
in numerous civilian casualties. And, Al-Qaida was
uncompromising: tribes had to choose sideseither
with Al-Qaida or with the United States. Recalcitrant
shaykhs were often assassinated.
However, it may have been, in particular, Al-Qai-
das negative impact on the tribes economic interests
was decisive in estranging both the tribal leadership
and ordinary tribesmen. Al-Qaidas violence in Al-
Anbar and its growing control over the local society
crippled the local economy and made U.S. projects un-
likely given the lack of security, thereby undercutting
the tribal shaykhs influence as they could no longer
broker economic benefits for their tribes. Al-Qaida also
competed at times for control over the lucrative trade
roads, a traditional source of some tribes income. In
the key case of Shaykh Abd Al-Sattar Abu Risha, who
eventually became the most prominent U.S. ally in Al-
Anbar province, a struggle with Al-Qaida for control
of the main supply route from Amman to Baghdad
pitted Al-Qaida against his tribe. Traditionally, Abu
Risha's tribe had supplied most of regions truck driv-
ers and may well have raided traffic and extorted
tolls. During this struggle with Al-Qaida, prominent
members of his family were killed.5 It was this turn
of events that induced Abd Al-Sattar to return from
Jordan in 2006 and to approach the United States to
join the fight against Al-Qaida.
Nevertheless, alone, the tribesor the insurgent
groups that were often intertwined with the tribes
realistically had been no match for Al-Qaidas orga-
nization, zeal, and ability to mass mobile forces from
multiple locations against isolated tribes. Many tribes
were reluctant to confront Al-Qaida, even as increas-
ing numbers of their fellow-tribesmen joined the latter,
9
because of its supposed dominance. Only gradually
did the escalating disenchantment among tribesmen,
accompanied by the increasing realization that co-
operation might be possible with U.S. forces, change
the environment.
U.S. policy had also evolved. At first, the United
States was indifferent or hostile to the Sunni tribes.
Because they were often tied to Saddams power
structure and were seen as part of a negative past,
American leaders were reluctant to take advantage of
a hospitable tribal terrain. Initially, as a former U.S.
military intelligence officer noted to a reporter:
10
and subsequently also in other Sunni areas, leading to
the formation of a formal alliance in September 2006
between U.S. forces and a newly-established tribal
organizationthe Sahwa.
11
All of it [i.e., money] we funneled through the sheikhs.
. . . We empowered the sheikhs because there really
wasnt a government functioning. . . . And we did all
we could to empower the sheikhs.12
12
Tribal forces joined the Sahwa in large numbers,
and initiatives followed to replicate the Al-Anbar
experience elsewhere. In some provinces, the Sahwa
was set up considerably later, as in the case of Diyala,
where it took until October 2008 to do so formally.
Nevertheless, already by March 2008, the Sahwa na-
tionwide numbered 91,000 personnel.
13
shield which enabled the Sahwa to wield its sword
against Al-Qaida at the level where it could make a
unique contribution.
U.S. strategy took advantage of the Sahwas
strengths: their knowledge of the local physical and
human terrain; their ability to identify and isolate sus-
pected Al-Qaida members (whether outsiders or fel-
low-tribesmen); the presence of ready-made tribally-
based cohesion; collective responsibility (despite rifts
in ideological loyalties even within families); and the
permanence which made possible continuous control
of an area, taking away Al-Qaidas mobility and ini-
tiative, so that it became very difficult for the latter to
operate without at least a tribes indifference. Equally
important was the Sahwas ability to find Al-Qaida
arms caches, the loss of which limited Al-Qaidas abil-
ity to move at an operational level.
Sahwa operations against Al-Qaida often took the
form of struggles within individual tribes, pitting pro
and anti-Al-Qaida tribesmen against each other, as Al-
Qaida had also recruited from within the tribes. In fact,
a local Sahwa commander noted that most of those
we arrest or kill are from our own tribe.17 Pitched bat-
tles were rare, though there were some fierce armed
engagements between Sahwa forces, often supported
by U.S. combat forces, and Al-Qaida. More frequently,
however, the dismantling of Al-Qaidas structure took
the form of identifying and isolating operatives within
a tribea task which only their tribe was capable of
doingand informing the authorities, turning them
over, or eliminating them directly. As part of the
anti-Al-Qaida fight, according to one shaykh, he had
personally reported to the authorities 130 members of
Al-Qaida from within his tribe, including an Al-Qaida
deputy commander and a minister in Al-Qaidas ISI,
14
which also suggests the depth to which Al-Qaida had
penetrated into the tribal fabric.18
Sahwa casualties in the war against Al-Qaida were
not negligible, with the Sahwa of Diyala province,
for example, suffering over 1,000 casualties fighting
against Al-Qaida.19 Sahwa leaders also paid a price,
as in the 2006-07 period alone, 28 prominent tribal
figures were killed.20
15
in Iraq, producing a comprehensive policy review in
late-2009/early-2010.25 So impressed was Al-Qaida
with the Sahwa that the document proposed to its
affiliate in Iraq a counter-Sahwa, however unrealisti-
cally, urging: We call on the Islamic State of Iraq to estab-
lish jihadi Sahwa Councils.26 (emphasis in the original).
Rather than railing against tribal loyalties as had ear-
lier been the case, Al-Qaida now saw local tribal forces
who were protecting their homes and their folkbut
not necessarily commited to Al-Qaidas beliefsas
their best hope for control of an area. They saw that
these tribal units draw their power from their local
environment, since they represent everyone in the area
which they are defending and protecting.27 Although
modeled on the Sahwa, in Al-Qaidas case, these units
were to have a jihadist orientation.
Al-Qaidas intelligence chief, likewise, drafted a
paper in April 2012 dealing specifically with the Sah-
wa. He acknowledged that the Sahwa in Iraq clearly
had an impact on the jihadist movement and that the
Sahwa in general is a new phenomenon for the fol-
lowers of the jihadist movement, one with which they
had not been accustomed to dealing.28 Both analyses
contained doctrinal guidelines for the future focused
largely on dealing with the population with a greater
degree of flexibility and realism in order not to alien-
ate potential tribal supporters into being receptive to
a Sahwa in any theater.
16
now plays the role of patron, as was the case with the
Sahwa in Iraq. As part of the phased handover of re-
sponsibility for the Sahwa from U.S. forces over the
December 2008-April 2009 period, the identity of the
governing authority changed for the Sahwa from the
United States to that of a local playerthe Iraqi gov-
ernment, with significant implications for the Sahwas
role and for the security situation in the country.
17
expressed his misgivings about the Sahwa early. He
drew attention to the fact that the Sahwas creation
had bypassed the nascent Iraqi government in an
extralegal move and that arming Sunni tribes would
weaken the government in the long run.29 A press re-
port, citing unnamed sources close to the Iraqi gov-
ernment, had called President George Bushs visit to
the Sahwa leader Shaykh Abd Al-Sattar Abu Risha
in September 2007 a not very friendly signal, which
contradicted protocol and embarrassed the politicians
who were brought in after midnight to meet with the
U.S. President in the strongholds of the tribal mili-
tias.30 The Iraqi government was reportedly angry
that the U.S. Government had not even informed it
when an invitation had been extended to the Anbar
Sahwa leaders for a visit to the White House in 2007,
as the Iraqi Prime Ministers adviser for tribal affairs,
Karim Bakhati, noted in a thinly veiled rebuke that
one would have thought that [the invitation] would
have been sent through the Iraqi government, and
concluded that sending invitations in this manner
bypasses the authority of the central government.31
The Sahwa expected to be treated as an equal play-
er, alongside the government and the U.S. forces for,
as a leading shaykh in Al-Anbar stressed, We are not
government employees.32 At times, Prime Minister
Nuri Al-Maliki was interested in developing ties with
the Sunni tribes, as was the case before the March 2010
elections. That proved difficult, however, as shaykhs
in one meeting with his representative expressed
skepticism about his intentions. The fact that the meet-
ing was also attended by U.S. military officers ensured
some civility, but the government representatives as-
sertion that The Sahwa was imposed on us because
of the security situation and his rhetorical question,
18
Does the Sahwa have any legal standing? high-
lighted the lack of mutual trust.33 Mistrust continued
to set the tone for the governments handling of the
Sahwa. When the author asked a senior Iraqi military
officer in 2012 about the current state of the Sahwa,
he replied We didnt want them, and expressed re-
sentment, saying that they were a drain on the Armys
budget you force us to pay [them]and insisted
that the Sahwa personnel could not be absorbed into
the military.34
(Mis)Managing the Sahwa and the Sunni Tribes.
To make matters worse, the Iraqi government mis-
managed its dealings with the Sahwa and with the
Sunni tribes in general after the U.S. handover. It tried
to marginalize the Sahwa, thereby alienating many
shaykhs and tribesmen and helping to create a more
favorable operational environment for Al-Qaida. The
result was a reduction of the Sahwas force structure
and a degradation of its capabilities.
Interruptions and irritations connected with
pay (now handled by the Army) alienated fighters
throughout the system and made them more recep-
tive to blandishments by Al-Qaida. In some cases, as
in Diyala, pay to 4,500 Sahwa fighters was interrupted
for more than a year.35 Some Sahwa fighters simply
walked off the job to protest late pay, such as those
who abandoned their checkpoints in Diyala.36 Pay is-
sues at times became so exasperating that Sahwa per-
sonnel in Baghdad threatened to rejoin Al-Qaida if
the situation did not improve.37 A former Sahwa com-
mander from Ramadi complained that:
19
or even permanently disabled fighting Al-Qaida do
not have medical care.
20
nation of Sahwa commanders a priority. The govern-
ments decision to end the salaries of the Sahwa lead-
ers bodyguards in 2010 was a very risky move, as it
increased the shaykhs already high vulnerability to
assassination attempts as the threats from Al-Qaida
increased, thereby putting the entire Sahwa struc-
ture in jeopardy. The government relented only with
reluctance, in an effort to retain the loyalty of tribal
leaders, but agreed only to a palliative solution: they
increased the shaykhs salaries and paid for just three
bodyguards for each Sahwa commander.43
Mishandling the Demobilization and Integration
of the Sahwa. The government was especially wary
that the Sahwa not become a parallel Sunni armed
force, but the clumsy demobilization effort only fur-
ther fueled discontent within the tribes. As part of
the handover, Al-Maliki had expressed his concern
at a press conference that the government needed to
ensure it had a monopoly over armed force and an-
nounced it would limit Sahwa powers of arrest, while
expressing the need to close out the Sahwa file.44
In contrast, Iraqs tribal leaders expected to continue
playing a significant political role, believing they
represent a dominant sector of society. The Sahwas
representative, Shaykh Thamir Al-Tamimi, posited
that the Sahwa should be maintained as long as there
was a security threat in the country, including from
Shia and Kurdish militiasin effect, putting off the
Sahwas disbandment into the distant future.45 The
governments announced intention to disarm the
Sahwa fighters and to limit gun permits was also un-
settling, especially in light of the integral gun culture
of tribal life. As one Sahwa leader, Shaykh Ali Hatim,
noted defiantly:
21
We will not hand over our weapons . . . why should
we hand them over? Is that not part of my worldview,
just like I have my religion so also I have my weapons.
That is, I believe that weapons are a part of who I am.46
22
Sahwa forces became progressively depleted, not
only by partial integration into the government sector
but also by outright release and the voluntary depar-
ture of disillusioned fighters. From a peak of 118,000
Sahwa personnel in April 2009 (although there may
also have been additional unofficial fighters), by Oc-
tober 2010 only some 52,000 fighters remained on the
official rolls.52 Eventually, the Sahwa was allowed to
wither away in all but name due to government ne-
glect, with a reported 30,000 members by early 2013,
although the actual number of those present for duty
and demoralized and resentful fighters at thatwas
probably even considerably lower.53
23
Qaida had an opportunity to draw away disillusioned
Sahwa fighters by offering material incentives, and
one Sahwa commander in Bayji warned that Al-
Qaida is spending large sums of money in order to
attract back Sahwa members.54 In the northern part
of the Baghdad region and in Diyala, some 15 percent
of the Sahwa fighters were said to have reverted to ISI
by late 2010.55 One Sahwa commander urged the gov-
ernment to rehire the Sahwa veterans who had been
dismissed, with the specific purpose of preventing ISI
from recruiting them again.56
Thanks to the mounting hostility against the gov-
ernment, ISI penetrated some Sahwa units, especially
as many former ISI members had joined the Sahwa
as a refuge after the U.S. victories. In the Abu Ghraib
area, so great was the official mistrust of the Sahwa
that the security forces refused to share intelligence
with the local Sahwa.57 In Diyala, some fighters serv-
ing in the Sahwa simply stopped cooperating with
the authorities; according to the provinces security
forces commander, They are not telling us if Al Qa-
eda is in the area. They are not warning us . . . A lot
of them are definitely helping the insurgents.58 In at
least some instances, even before the U.S. withdrawal,
the local Sahwa might cooperate with U.S. forces dur-
ing the daytime, but then there would still be gunfire
and rockets directed at U.S. bases at night, indicat-
ing that the Sahwa at the very least was not always
reacting forcefully to the ISI presence, if not actually
cooperating with the latter, as a way of hedging its
bets.59 Over time, Al-Qaida was able to rebuild its
presence in many Sunni areas, reestablishing camps,
continuing its harassment attacks against recalcitrant
Sahwa commanders and mounting small-scale opera-
tionsand the occasional spectacular oneagainst
government targets.
24
Tribal Revolt, the ISIS Onslaught,
and Rehabilitating the Sahwa.
25
oppose ISISeven if not out of love for the govern-
mentsome tribes now saw also ISIS as a useful, if
distasteful, ally against an even more distasteful cen-
tral government, while still other tribes remained
neutral.61 The government even accused some in the
Sahwa, such as in Babil, of being passive spectators
collecting salaries.62 ISIS, for its part, tried to deter
tribesmen from participating in the Sahwa by de-
capitating or hanging the Sahwa fighters it captured,
They also took reprisals against the families of Sahwa
commanders. Many Sunnis, in fact, have continued to
see ISIS as a counterweight to a hostile government
or to Shia militias (or even to Kurdish forces in cer-
tain areas), a factor that ISIS has stressed, thus making
the Arab tribes more willing to cooperate with ISIS.63
(See Figure 1.)
Benefiting from the combat experience and equip-
ment acquired fighting against the Asad regime in
neighboring Syria, ISIS (known in the local sources by
its Arabic acronym DAISH) was able to transfer some
forces from the latter and to take advantage of Sunni
discontent with the central government and of the
Iraqi Armys critical vulnerabilities. In the campaign
that unfolded, ISIS was able rapidly to take many of
the towns in Al-Anbar as well as in other provinces
and, in the process, to cause significant casualties and
embarrassing defeats to the countrys security forces.
As the security situation worsened, a beleaguered
government hurriedly tried to reconstitute the de-
pleted Sahwa, relying on Al-Anbars fragmented
system of tribal rivalries to find support against ISIS
even if only among part of the population. Baghdad
quadrupled Sahwa salaries to $430 a month for fight-
ers in May 2013 and, the following month, allocated
$130 million to finance the Sahwa through the rest of
the year.64
26
Note: Figure 1 denotes an ISIS cartoon reminding Iraqis they
need it (ISIS) for protection against the government. Local resi-
dent earlier telling ISI fighter to leave, but later regretting that
now the area was at the mercy of the Iraqi government. Frame 1:
All of you leave our hamlet. Its our hamlet and we will defend
it. Frame 2: Help! The mujahidin have left and are allowing the
government to butcher us!
27
In a 2013 recruitment campaign 10,000 new person-
nel, eventually rising to 16,000, were added to the Sah-
wa rolls.65 The government also began to provide help
with organization, logistics, equipment, and arms.66
Some tribes, however, continued to hedge their bets,
with their fighters working in the Sahwa during the
daytime and with the insurgents at night.67
However, no doubt concerned about creating a
future threat, the government remained reluctant to
establish Sahwa maneuver units, despite requests
for that, preferring the Sahwa to continue operating
as small groups.68 In an effort to try to consolidate
command and control, and playing on tribal and
personal rivalries, the government engineered the re-
placement in February 2013 of long-time Sahwa com-
mander Ahmad Abu Risha by Wisam Al-Hardan, a
tribal shaykh with fewer connections in the Gulf, who
was seen as more cooperative with the government.
By early-2014, the security situation had deteriorated
further, and the government felt it necessary to in-
crease the inducements to the Sahwa, promising $1
billion for reconstruction in Al-Anbar (although some
estimates placed the amount of damage in Al-Anbar
at $20 billion by May 2014), the future absorption of
10,000 Sahwa personnel into the security forces, and
increased operational support in the form of air power
and artillery.69
However, in the new operational and political
environment, the Sahwas success is less likely than
when the Americans had been in charge. Currently,
the Sahwa is no match in the field for the reener-
gized Al-Qaida with its recently-developed combat
capabilities.
Relying on advanced weaponry (seized from Syr-
ian Army arsenals or funneled to the anti-Asad rebels
28
by foreign countries) and combat experience gained in
Syria, in both urban terrain and conventional opera-
tions, they have developed effective maneuver units
that use both mobility and surprise. These units op-
erations are backed by solid intelligence, well-devel-
oped psychological operations skills, solid plans tar-
geting the adversarys weak points, flexible logistics,
and even combat engineers. Thanks to these strengths,
ISIS forces have continually out maneuvered and out-
fought the Iraqi Army.
The Iraqi Armyplagued by faulty planning,
lackluster and corrupt leaders, inadequate training,
poor intelligence, neglect of the troops basic needs,
and inexperience in urban combatwas hard-pressed
survive, much less to cooperate effectively with the
Sahwa in meeting the ISIS challenge. Often, the Army
was unable to seize and hold terrain, and usually re-
sorted to inaccurate shelling and airstrikes along with
other heavy-handed behavior that caused civilian ca-
sualties and damage that served as a further cause for
Sunni discontent.70 Some critics contended that some
Army commanders were still reluctant to operate with
the Sahwa due to sectarian bias, while Baghdads of-
ficials in Al-Anbar in late 2013 had actually opposed
expanding the Sahwa.71
Army casualties mounted, which some uncon-
firmed Iraqi security reports placed at over 6,000 dead
and wounded by May 2014, out of 28,000 engaged in
combat.72 By then, Sahwa commanders could only
travel to Baghdad by air due to the insecure roads.
Morale was becoming a significant problem, leading
to desertions, with an Iraqi security source reporting
a 30 percent failure to return to the front after home
leave, requiring replacements to be deployed from
other parts of the country.73 By mid-June 2014, the
29
Army in many areas had literally disintegrated in the
face of a far smaller enemy, abandoning its equipment
and fleeing, evenas in the case of Mosulbefore ISIS
attacked. Over 500 senior Army officers were said to
have fled to neighboring Kurdish territory dressed in
civilian clothes.74 Notwithstanding continuing rosy
situation reports from the government as well as the
Army calling the retreat from Al-Anbar only a tac-
tical withdrawal, it was hard to argue that a small
ISIS contingent had routed a much larger Army force
and that it had seized sizeable swathes of territory,
including many cities. In their advance, ISIS also ac-
quired additional weapons (including the arsenal of
the disintegrated 3rd Division), money seized from
banks, and freed detained jihadis. They also sought
to establish control over dams and water supplies as
well as oil facilities, in order to exercise greater power
over the tribal areas in addition to an advantage on
the battlefield.
30
zon and did not feel threatened by the autonomy and
sectarianism of the Sahwa and its parent tribes.
In operational terms, the Sahwa was often mis-
used. Lacking numbers (and no doubt reluctant to
take heavy casualties), the Army at one point was con-
sidering sending in the Sahwa and police to retake Al-
Falluja, although they were likely to be outmatched
by a defending veteran Al-Qaida force.75 Such mili-
tias cannot be considered a stand-alone maneuver
element. Lacking as they do the necessary training
and weaponry, they would likely be outgunned and
outperformed by a proficient combat force such as
Al-Qaida had become. The Sahwa is most effective in
small-scale anti-guerrilla engagements and as a secu-
rity force for consolidation operations. The Sahwa op-
erates optimally with a regular force that can provide
it with effective support in functions such as fires, lo-
gistics, command and control, and mobility, support
which the Iraqi Army only slowly acknowledged as
desirable but became unable to provide.
Nevertheless, even as late as mid-2014, the condi-
tions that had provided the favorable background for
the United States to develop the Sahwa were still in
evidence. In its rapid advance with relatively small
forces, ISIS had not consolidated its control over ter-
ritory, often bypassing areas of secondary importance
or those where tribes put up a stiff resistance. Also,
as earlier, ISIS has been in an uneasy coalition with
Bathist ex-officers, tribal insurgents, national-religious
and moderate jihadistsallies who had joined recent-
ly as ISISs success became apparent and, as before,
friction soon arose among these disparate groups.
Moreover, ISIS was still bent on imposing strict reli-
gious law (including banning soccer, burning down
beauty salons, and enforcing modest clothing), as
31
well as demolishing saints shrines, pressuring local
women into marriage, and executing perceived oppo-
nents.76 As late as June 2014, prominent Sunni tribal
shaykhs and mainstream clerics expressed a willing-
ness to work with the government against ISIS pro-
vided Prime Minister Nuri Al-Maliki stepped down.77
Resistance to ISIS by tribal forces, often raised on local
initiative, continued in cooperation with the remnants
of security forces in the field in mid-2014.78 ISIS itself
continues to view the Sahwa as a threat and has cre-
ated special anti-Sahwa units, the Sahwa Hunters.
(See Figure 2.)
32
unwilling to adopt that option. Sunni tribal militias
persisted in requesting arms, financial, logistic, and
operational support from the government, into mid-
2014, but little was forthcoming.79 Tribal militiamen in
Al-Anbar, for example, complained in late June-2014
that they received no guidance or weapons or other
support from the Army, which they accused of with-
drawing and abandoning them to face ISIS alone.80
When the government did encourage new tribal
militias, as the ISIS threat approached the Shia heart-
land, the focus was mainly among the Shia tribes in
central and southern Iraq, with a smattering of Sunni
tribes in mixed areas. While some Shia militias contin-
ued to be organized within party and religious broth-
erhood structures, the Shia response was now along
tribal lines. It is claimed that 250,000 have volunteered
for service, especially after the senior Shia cleric,
Grand Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani, issued a fatwa in June
2014 designating such service as a religious duty.81
Each tribe established a volunteer recruitment center,
while in Baghdad, tribal meeting houses served as
mustering centers for the new militiamen coming from
outside the capital.82 The outpouring of Shia support,
and the Shia Sahwas promises that it would operate
in and retake largely-Sunni areas such as Mosul and
Salah Al-Din province, along with Prime Minister Al-
Malikis declarations that he would liberate Al-Anbar,
no doubt only alienated many Sunnis further.
Conversely, with increased government depen-
dence on tribal fighters in the Shia community, de-
mands for enhanced political power quickly also
emerged among the newly-established Shia Sahwa.
In turn, the tribal Sahwa in the Basra area demanded
the creation of a stand-alone ministry for a National
Guard, which may make Prime Minister Al-Maliki
33
uncomfortable.83 Moreover, government talk of incor-
porating the new volunteers into the Armyalbeit as
distinct unitswas met within the Army with little
enthusiasm, as it assessed the often over-age, out-of-
shape, and untrained manpower pool as unsuitable
for conventional military operations.84
As of mid-2014, although the situation remained
fluid, Baghdad indicated that the government would
no longer prioritize building a more effective relation-
ship with the Sunni community or the Sunni Sahwa.
They believed these efforts would entail a significant
restructuring of the current Iraqi political system and a
devolution of some powers from the center to the par-
ent Sunni tribal areas. While Prime Minister Al-Maliki
could try to reverse the major defeats suffered on the
ground with a renewed military effort buttressed
by the help of foreign advice and support, it is more
likely that he may decide to focus instead on the Shia
core areas, which contain both the bulk of Iraqs oil re-
serves and the only outlet to the sea, and which would
enable him to consolidate his own power, rather than
working to secure all or parts of majority-Sunni areas
to the north of Baghdad for strategic reasons.85 Even
in case of the countrys de facto partition, significant
instability and conflict are likely to persist for years,
especially with no clearly defined borders and many
mixed and disputed areas. This is even more likely
because ISIS has become overconfident, imbued with
victory fever pursuing maximalist goals. However,
even if, as seems likely, the Baghdad government has
squandered its opportunity to work with a Sunni tribal
militia movement to counter the ISIS, that failure does
not invalidate the potential utility and even necessity
of developing and using such a capability in dealing
with Al-Qaida and its offshoots.
34
MODEL 2
35
These circumstances apparently induced Al-Qaida to
calculate that the time had come to escalate its opera-
tional goals and change its objective to one of setting
up a state. As even a low-level Al-Qaida operative saw
it, We benefited from these revolutions. They gave us
maneuver space. We were able to come out. . . . We
were able to tell people about our mission.86
Al-Qaida now escalated its activities and began to
carry out increasingly large-scale operations, leading
at times to engagements involving large units, and
often embarrassing the Yemeni Army and inflicting
heavy casualties. In particular, Al-Qaida decided to
concentrate its effort on where it could bring its great-
est power to bear, namely in the Sunni tribal areas of
the southern part of the country, where it had already
been operating with mixed results and where there
was an inherent mistrust of and sense of neglect at
the hands of the government. For example, in Abyan
province, the focus of its expanded activity, Al-Qaida
reportedly was able to mass some 2,000 fighters by
June 2011.87
In fact, boasting of having captured artillery, air
defense guns, and tanks from the Army, Al-Qaida in
September 2011 proclaimed in its official bulletin the
completion of the attrition phase against the Army.
They meant that the first phase of the three-phase
Maoist-based insurgency program which Al-Qaida
had long internalized had been concluded, and that it
was now appropriate to move up to the second, more
advanced, phase of insurgency.88 Al-Qaida also de-
cided to expand its activity on the ground by seizing
and holding terrain. True, Al-Qaida ran into tribal re-
sistance in Dali province, an area that had long been a
stronghold of leftist sentiment.89 However, elsewhere,
thanks to the weakened government and a reduced
36
security presence, Al-Qaida was able to establish con-
trol in several towns during 2011, including Zunjubar,
Jaar, Lawdar, and Shaqra in Abyan province, Rida in
Al-Bayda province, and Azzan in Shabwa Province.
They even planned to advance on Aden itself, the
largest city in the South.
37
area, Al-Qaida was able to impose its harsh model
of society. Special attention was devoted to Islamiz-
ing the educational system, and the sexes were now
strictly separated in schools. In the town of Azzan,
music was forbidden in public areas, shop owners
were told to grow beards, women were not permitted
to work outside the home, and television and maga-
zines were banned.93 In one town, Al-Qaida attacked a
wedding party and smashed the musical instruments
being used in the festivities.94 Al-Qaida also cracked
down on alcohol and drugs, imposing harsh Islamic
penalties, as was the case of a hashish user who was
flogged.95
Al-Qaida, also sought to stamp out what it calls
sorcery and deviance, catch-all terms for what
are in reality deeply-entrenched features of tradi-
tional folk religion. In Yemens case, such practices as
the veneration of saints and their tombs and of living
holy men as the medium of intercession, mystical sufi
brotherhoods, talismans, curses, incantations, and for-
tune tellers are widespread. In fact, Al-Qaida, while
in power, was proud to announce initiatives such as
their arrest of a sorcerer in one town, and it resumed
the campaign with the August 2013 declaration of
war against sorcerers and their pursuit, especially in
Hadramawt province.96 However, at times, Al-Qaida
met with spontaneous resistance, as in the case of the
attempt to suppress one sorcerer in Rida, which led
to a lethal shootout between the latters followers and
Al-Qaida personnel.97
More generally, the rapid imposition of the Sharia
to replace the more flexible and familiar traditional
tribal law also created more than its share of friction
with the tribesmen subjected to it.98 No doubt tribal
leaders often saw Al-Qaidas presence as a direct chal-
38
lenge to own their authority within their tribe, not
least with the replacement of tribal law (in which the
tribal shaykh and notables would have considerable
influence and which would be a source of power and
material gain for the tribal notables) by the Sharia. As
Al-Qaidas Amir, or leader, in Abyan province, Jalal
Al-Marqashi, acknowledged, his organization had
tried to negotiate an agreement in one town with the
local Popular Committees, but the stumbling block
was Al-Qaidas insistence on the implementation of
the Sharia, which the Popular Committees had re-
jected categorically, asserting We cannot apply the
Sharia in the town!!99 Local people reportedly also
grumbled that punishments were handed out arbi-
trarily, without adequate investigations.100 Even some
of their initial supporters were said to have become
disillusioned by the harshness of Al-Qaidas rule.101
39
To fill the vacuum resulting from the paralysis of
the government as protests mounted in the capital
against President Salih, some local leaders had also
began to establish Committees in mid-2011, largely
to regulate prices for staples or the distribution of es-
sentials such as propane.103 At first, such spontaneous
Committees often cooperated with Al-Qaida, as when
the latter took the city of Jaar from the Army in 2011,
but soon disputes emerged.104
However, with encouragement and money from
the new government, additional official Committees
were now set up, often by government order, and
many tribal leaders in Abyan and Shabwa provinces
were quick to respond, with the specific intent of coun-
tering Al-Qaida. Tribes in Yemen are traditionally al-
ready well-armed, not only with personal weapons
and rocket propelled grenades, but also with crew-
served systems such as armor, artillery, multiple rock-
et launchers, mortars, and truck-mounted anti-aircraft
guns used in a ground mode. However, in operational
terms, the tribes on their own, isolated in their nar-
row arena, found it hard to compete militarily with
Al-Qaida. The latter enjoyed the same advantages of
familiarity with the local terrain, but also had the abil-
ity to move and mass over wider territories, thanks
to a cohesive force structure. They even had gained
artillery after their initial defeats of the Yemeni Army.
Perhaps the key inducement from the government
side was the money that the latter provided to the Pop-
ular Committees. The shaykhs commanding the Com-
mittees became the conduit for the salaries and now,
once again, it was the tribal shaykhs and notables who
settled disputes among their fellow-tribesmen, rather
than Al-Qaidas Sharia officials, thus restoring their
usurped authority and providing them with addi-
40
tional political and financial resources.105 For ordinary
tribal fighters, the new salaryranging from $60 to
$150 a month, depending on the locality, plus foodis
a princely sum in a country where that is equal to the
average salary for a teacher and where over 54 percent
of the population lives in poverty on less than $2 per
day. In a country where unemployment is rampant,
it is not surprising that most of the Committee fight-
ers were drawn from the unemployed youth, often no
more than boys.106
With the implicit delegation of control of an area
to Committees and the absence of a government pres-
ence, the temptation also increased for the Commit-
tees to take advantage for their own benefit. There
were complaints of arbitrary arrests, punishments,
and executions, including the fatal flogging of one
Army soldier they arrested for drinking.107 According
to one of the founders of the Committees in Abyan,
the local population began to call Committee mem-
bers thieves and highway robbers after the latter
looted government property when Al-Qaida left in
2012. Committee members have often been accused of
extorting money from truckers and merchants, which
was made easier after they had expelled two battal-
ions of national police from the province.108 The lure of
plunder may also be an inducement to recruitment, as
illustrated by the dispute that arose between the local
government in one district and the Committees over
the division of vehicles and weapons captured from
Al-Qaida, while in other instances the Army and the
Committees exchange mutual recriminations over the
looting of refugees houses.109
41
Taking the Fight to Al-Qaida.
42
separatists in the South. For example, despite appeals
from tribal leaders in late-2013 that the Army retain
its presence in order to provide security in Al-Mahfad
district in Abyan province, the units in question had to
be withdrawn in order to reinforce the understrength
111th Brigade and the 2nd Brigade of the Republican
Guard, leaving the original area more vulnerable to
Al-Qaida.111
43
forces could strike. It also preemptively evacuated all
the other towns in the area that it had seized earlier.115
To be sure, Al-Qaidas defeat came at a high human
price for all players. For example, there were hun-
dreds of dead locals in the Lawdar district, where the
fighting extended over a 5-week period.116 Likewise,
to retake the city of Zunjubar in Abyan province, offi-
cial sources placed Army and Committee fighter loss-
es at 280, although that number may well have been
considerably higher.117
Given the Armys shortcomings, the Popular Com-
mittees have proved to be a crucial asset in the fight
against Al-Qaida especially since, according to a se-
nior Yemeni security official, the Army is not welcome
in the southern and eastern parts of the country, given
the overrepresentation of Northerners in its command
structure.118 Moreover, the involvement of such local
forces helps mitigate the image of the Yemeni govern-
ments dependence on the United States for support,
which can compromise its legitimacy.
44
initiative, thanks to a well-developed sense of territo-
rial possession and the checkpoints that the Popular
Committees set up on their own lands, thus making
a major contribution to local security. As one Ye-
meni assessment saw it, a key reason for the Com-
mittees continuing effectiveness was that each area
is defended by its own sons, as each Committee ex-
ercises its control within its own geographic space
. . . each on its own territory.120 In fact, press reports
claimed that once the tribes took over the check-
points in Hadramawt province in December 2013,
they proved more effective against Al-Qaida than the
Army had been.121
Moreover, given the absence of a strong Yemeni
police presence in many areas, the Committees have
provided law and order, as well as anti-terrorism
service, freeing additional government forces for the
anti-terrorist fight. The Committees have often been
responsible for identifying and detaining Al-Qaida
personnel and thus preventing potentially-significant
security incidents. There is also a record of thwart-
ing many small-scale attacks, such as the case of the
arrest of an Al-Qaida operative at a wedding cer-
emony in Abyan province found to be wearing an
explosive vest.122
45
movements in the South, tribal dissidence, and a con-
tinuing neglect of many tribal areas in terms of ser-
vices and political participation. This instability con-
tinued to provide fertile ground for Al-Qaida, which
was soon able to rally and reestablish many of its lost
positions, mounting embarrassing attacks on the gov-
ernment and security forces. Initially, Al-Qaida was
forced to revert to a focus on clandestine activity and
guerrilla operations characterized by low-level ac-
tions such as assassinations, kidnappings, small-scale
ambushes, and car bombs, punctuated only infre-
quently by bigger attacks against government targets.
By mid-2013, however, there was a return of a signifi-
cant Al-Qaida military presence along with a sharp
rise in the size and lethality of its armed attacks. This
resurgence included strikes in the capital and against
Brigade-sized bases that caused significant casualties
and embarrassed the government.
Stung by the regeneration of the Al-Qaida threat,
the Yemeni government decided on a large-scale cam-
paign in the spring of 2014. They targeted two south-
ern provincesShabwa and Abyanwhere Al-Qaida
had made the greatest inroads. Although the official
Yemeni news releases were not always reliable, the
government forces, which included both the Army
and police, appeared to have made significant prog-
ress. This resulted in extensive Al-Qaida casualties
and, progressively, the latters loss of virtually all the
territory it had controlled in those two provinces.
The Committees were an integral part of the 2014
campaign, featuring prominently in local news re-
porting. Abandoning the policy of neglect that had al-
lowed the Committees to atrophy in many areas after
the campaign of 2012, the government, according to
one Yemeni source, now recruited 15,000 new Com-
46
mittee fighters. That caused a significant expansion
of personnelin reality and on paperby the end of
2013.123 At least one tribe provided a Committee force
that was 600-strong for the 2014 campaign.124 Units of
over a hundred Committee fighters operating along-
side the Army were not uncommon.125
Committee fighters were reported to have been
instrumental in locating both Al-Qaida strongholds
and refuges for the Army.126 As press photos from the
field show the Committees fought side-by-side with
the countrys Army and policeoften out of their
home areasas light infantry in conventional opera-
tions, although the Committees had previously had
no equipment or training for that role, apart from their
assumed ability to shoot and endure harsh conditions.
However, the fighters apparently were allowed to de-
ploy only with their personal weapons. On at least one
occasion, the poorly-armed Committee fighters com-
plained about being thrown into an engagement after
Al-Qaida had ambushed an Army unit.127
In addition, the Committees were used in clear-
ing operations in urban areas and villages, and were
particularly effective in house-to-house searches.128 In
2014 as in the earlier campaign, the Committees sus-
tained significant casualties. The battle for the town
of Lawdar in Abyan province alone reportedly re-
sulted in more than 120 dead and 300 wounded in the
Committee ranks.129
Al-Qaida has continued to view the Popular
Committees as particularly troublesome, given their
competition with Al-Qaida for control of the same
tribal population and has sought to delegitimize the
Committees by labeling them criminal gangs, high-
way robbers, and moral deviates who serve foreign
interests.130 (See Figure 3.)
47
Note: Al-Qaida anti-Popular Committee poster in Yemen: Trai-
tors: Americas Popular Committees in Lawdar, available from
Al-Qaida websites, 2012.
48
that it would fight against anyone who joined the
Committees.131
49
Note: Underlining the Yemeni tribes control of territory, re-
sentment at the Armys presence, and enduring friction with
the central government, a tribesman chewing the tradition-
al mild qat narcotic, frisks a soldier at a tribal checkpoint: Do
you have any weapons on you, soldier? Akhbar Al-Saa (Sanaa),
December 24, 2013.
50
South indeed saw as the nucleus of a future southern
army.134 The tribes general mistrust of the central gov-
ernment was reflected in the fact that, after the 2012
defeat of Al-Qaida, many of the tribes also wanted the
Army to leave their lands.
51
locals very likely had helped the raiders to penetrate
the area. As some tribes have remained sympathetic
to Al-Qaida or at least neutral, following this raid the
local tribal Committee felt it necessary to warn other
tribes not to provide shelter to any of the withdrawing
Al-Qaida personnel.137
52
government had not provided support for the families
of their comrades who had been killed or wounded as
had been promised, and that the Committee had not
received arms and vehicles, but had to make up losses
from their own means. More broadly, the same Com-
mittee grumbled that the government only collected
taxes but did not provide any services.140
The Yemeni press also released official documents
that highlight the governments dysfunctional policy
toward the Popular Committees, revealing that, at one
point, the countrys Ministry of Defense was receiv-
ing five million Riyals ($23,000) from Saudi Arabia to
pay the Popular Committees every day, but that the
actual disbursement to the tribes was only two mil-
lion Riyals a day, with accusations that the rest was
being diverted for personal use by government offi-
cials.141 One can imagine that such reports helped fuel
additional discontent against the government among
Committee fighters.
Committee fighters unhappy about late or unpaid
salaries have often blocked roadsone of the stan-
dard Yemeni protest methodsto highlight their dis-
content.142 In one case, angry Committees in Shabwa
province suspended their activity for a week in Janu-
ary 2014.143 In February 2014, one Committee com-
mander in Abyan province quit in protest to what he
said was the governments lack of payment, a move
which the other commanders in the province support-
ed, threatening to do the same unless such problems
were addressed.144 Complaining that the government
was ignoring its rights and not addressing its de-
mands, at the height of the fighting, the Committee in
Ataq, the capital of Shabwa province, called a 1-week
strike in May 2014, suspending its field operations.145
53
Command and control issues for the Committees
during the 2014 campaign proved challenging in the
field for the Yemeni military. In at least one reported
incident, the Committees in two districts of Abyan
withdrew from an active front, complaining that they
were not getting adequate food from the military and
that the latter was controlling their movement.146 Ac-
cording to other Yemeni press accounts, the military
commander in this instance was glad to see the Com-
mittee return home, as he had narrowly escaped an
assassination attempt by one of its members, and he
feared that the force had been penetrated by Al-Qa-
ida.147 Other reports told of the Committees looting
weapons and equipment from Army units reluctant
to take the field.148
Moreover, the Committees believe the Yemeni
government has assumed a responsibility to integrate
their fighters into the security and government sec-
tors. While the Yemeni authorities have indeed prom-
ised that these fighters eventually could be absorbed
into the military, police, or civil service, it is difficult to
find places for additional personnel either in the bloat-
ed government bureaucracy or the partisan and costly
military and police. Some Committee personnel have
protested the broken promises of government jobs by
blocking roads.149 Although the creation of the Popu-
lar Committees has helped absorb some of the unem-
ployed youth in the tribes, this is only a temporary
solution. It is also one that can generate a backlash
if the cash-strapped government neglects or decides
to discontinue financing the program, thereby provid-
ing Al-Qaida with a more benign operational environ-
ment, as occurred in Iraq under similar circumstances.
54
Some Southerners have also begun to resent what
they feel is the Armys use of southern tribal personnel
as cannon fodder in high-casualty out-of-area opera-
tions. They claim the government was willing to do so
in order to spare northern lives and to weaken, if not
eliminate, the Popular Committees. For example, as
the 2014 campaign was unfolding, one editorial asked,
Why are the Popular Committees taking part in this
campaign which is being described as a campaign
against Al-Qaida in Abyan and Shabwa, since this is a
job for the Army?150 The editorial further accused the
government of hoping to see the Popular Committees
commanders perish in the fighting.
Significantly, the Committees are a newly-legiti-
mized armed actor that enables tribes to more easily
reject central government authority and, at the same
time, undercut national unity. From the beginning of
their existence, a number of clashes have occurred be-
tween the Army and the Committees, such as when
the latter refused to hand over to the Army govern-
ment buildings that Committee members had seized
from Al-Qaida in Azzan in July 2012.151 There, and
elsewhere, security matters have often since been per-
formed independently by both the Committees and
the Army, including duplicate security checkpoints
on the roads.152 Confrontations over the authority to
set up checkpoints have continued to occur and have
sometimes led to armed clashes between the Com-
mittees and the Army, as was the case in Hadramawt
province in January 2014.153
As part of the 2014 campaign, the Yemeni govern-
ment also promised the tribes that it would provide
more public services. For example, after the retaking
of the town of Al-Mahfad, the visiting newly-appoint-
ed provincial governor announced a new page, and
55
promised that the government would restore commu-
nications, and bring electric power, water, and health
services to the local population.154 However, whether
the Yemeni government, perennially short of cash and
of experts, can meet such promises in a timely man-
ner, or whether it wants to strengthen the hand of the
tribes, remains in doubt. In fact, by June 2014, the lo-
cal Committees and tribesmen in Abyan were already
protesting against the government. They were angry
that no compensation had been paid for the damage
they incurred as a result of recent government opera-
tions against Al-Qaida, as well as the lack of improve-
ment in the provision of public services.155 Elsewhere,
as in Radfan in Lahij province, the Committees closed
roads in June 2014 as they demanded back pay, which
had been interrupted for 3 months.156
Clearly, in 2014 Al-Qaida lost the towns it had con-
trolled and was pushed out of the two affected prov-
inces, suffering extensive casualties and equipment
losses in the process. Yemen Minister of Defense Ma-
jor General Muhammad Nasr declared by early-May
2014 that government forces had broken the back
of Al-Qaida and would not stop until Al-Qaida had
been eliminated entirely.157 The operational success of
the 2014 campaign notwithstanding, it may still be too
early to judge whether the setback will translate into
Al-Qaidas demise or simply become part of a sine-
wave pattern in Yemen of defeat and regeneration for
the latter. In fact, there were indications that Al-Qaida
may have been repeating its earlier strategy of with-
drawing to preserve its force structure and awaiting
more suitable operational conditions. The Yemeni
Army itself spoke of Al-Qaidas wholesale flight,
and some Al-Qaida fighters simply melted back into
their tribes, as they had done after the 2012 defeat. A
56
case in point: as part of a deal the tribes in one area
brokered between the Army and Al-Qaida during the
2014 campaign, only outsiders were required to leave,
while local Al-Qaida members could return home.158
The bulk of Al-Qaida fighters seem to have redeployed
to other provinces, such as neighboring Hadramawt,
where there were existing safe-houses and camps, but
also further afield as in Lahij, Marib, and Ibb prov-
inces, suggesting this was not a decisive campaign,
with some Yemenis intimating that deals were made
to allow Al-Qaida to withdraw.159 At the same time,
Al-Qaida was still able to continue launching mostly
small and mid-scale strikes, including in the capital.
Conclusion.
57
by or with the consent of local governments is most
conducive to success, and the ultimate impact of such
militias will depend on the local governments treat-
ment of the tribal sector. Nevertheless, as is often true
in the real world, this is not a panacea, and, based on
past experience, there are cautionary guidelines to
be remembered for the creation and function of such
tribal militias that could make the difference between
success or ultimate failure.
Each of the two models studied has political and
military advantages and disadvantages, but one may
not have the luxury of which option to select in a spe-
cific situation. Comparing Model 1 and Model 2 sug-
gests some general conclusions:
In Model 1 (as in IraqPhase I), an outside patron
in control, acting as the de facto governing authority,
may be able to exercise better command and control,
ensure more efficient use of money and other aid, and
prevent or moderate the tribal militias use for sectar-
ian purposes than might a corrupt or ineffective na-
tional government. An outside patron may be more
effective than a national government that may itself be
a political player and potentially hostile to the tribal
sector, which it might view as a rival. At the same
time, a lack of permanence may make it difficult for
an outside patron to ensure that the achievements of
the militias it supported will be maintained once it
leaves. In some instances, this model may be the only
option available in the absence of an effective national
government to act as patron, as was the case in many
of the Sunni areas of Iraq in the years after Saddam
Husseins fall.
In Model 2 (as in IraqPhase II and in Yemen),
with a foreign patron in a support mode and a nation-
al government in charge, the latter may have the ad-
58
vantage of credibility in offering permanent support
to the tribal militias and their parent tribes, which a
foreign patron, with its short-term horizon, ordinar-
ily will not. This model may also be less sensitive for
an emerging local governments legitimacy than a for-
eign patron would be. In this model, there is an inher-
ent tension and mistrust between any government in
the Middle East, traditionally prone to centralize con-
trol, and any armed tribal force that may seek greater
autonomy and establishes the capability to do so. This
paradigm is only superseded temporarily by a dire
need to confront Al-Qaida, as demonstrated when the
Iraqi government revived the Sahwa in 2013, despite
its manifest discomfort with the Sunni tribes, in order
to deal with a deteriorating security situation. In some
cases, this may also be the only option available, as the
United States may not be on the ground and in control
of a country.
59
In Model 1, with the United States as the direct
patron of militias, it should:
Understand the strengths and limitations of
tribal militias and shape the latters roles and
missions accordingly. Tribal militias are most
effective operating on their own territory. In
particular, tribal militias have a good knowl-
edge of the human and physical terrain in their
own tribal areas, built up over generations.
Tribal members have the linguistic skills, fa-
miliarity with customs, and personal acquain-
tance with individuals that enables them to
identify outsiders and suspicious locals. They
can be used for sensitive tasks such as search-
ing homes in their own tribal area. Coupled
with their permanent presence on the terrain,
they can provide stability once an area has been
made secure by heavier forces. As such, even
after the major fighting has ended, tribal mili-
tias, in conjunction with the police, can play a
positive role in controlling an area, and main-
taining the general security that contributes to
preventing an environment in which Al-Qaida
could regenerate. Conversely, although poten-
tially proficient in small-scale engagements,
tribal militias ordinarily lack the armaments,
training, and command and control for larger-
scale conventional operations against a skilled
and well-armed opponent as Al-Qaida can be
at times, such as in present-day Iraq. Out-of-
area operations may be risky for tribal militias,
as they may be at a disadvantage in terms of
familiarity with the terrain and social milieu,
while increasing the likelihood of their engag-
ing in plunder and other misdeeds against the
residents outside their tribe.
60
Support a tribal militia adequately in mate-
rial terms. In most areas where Al-Qaida is
operating, either the population traditionally
has suffered economic and social neglect or is
hurting now because of the instability. While
some individuals will be motivated for ideo-
logical reasons, many others will be influenced
by material needs. Funding must be sufficient
to pay salaries that will attract tribal fighters,
as well as to provide goods such as food and
fuel, and social services to the fighters tribes.
As in Iraq, salaries, job-creating projects, provi-
sion of materiel and social services, can be basic
elements ensuring a committed Sahwa. Such
civil projects and services can be tied directly
to the tribal militias. The deterioration of such
support by the follow-on patron had negative
consequences that proved difficult to over-
come. Providing the militias with the military
means is also necessary, including supplying
arms, munitions, and vehicles at the appropri-
ate level. The militias must have effective op-
erational support from their patron in the form
of U.S. forces, focused on such complementary
capabilities as fires (air and ground), logistics,
intelligence, information operations, and help
with mobility.
Provide effective protection for key tribal mi-
litia leaders from inevitable Al-Qaida efforts
to eliminate them, which could have serious
consequences for the effectiveness of a militia.
Every effort should be made to convince the
follow-on government of the need for that pro-
tection to continue. Otherwise, the lack of effec-
tive provisions for post-handover security may
61
reduce the readiness of tribesmen to join a mili-
tia against Al-Qaida, fearful of their subsequent
abandonment by their patron. Understandably,
Sahwa leaders were concerned about their own
safety before the U.S. withdrawal, and Al-Qa-
ida has continued to target such leaders and
their families.160
In what is frequently a fragmented tribal po-
litical environment, discourage the use of tribal
militias in inter-tribal feuds and avoid becom-
ing involved in inter-tribal and intra-tribal ri-
valries unless this impedes the effectiveness of
the tribal militia. Tribes may well be divided
on whether or not to support a militia and/or
the national government, and individual tribes
may also be fractured internally on this issue, as
has been the case in both Iraq and Yemen. For
example, in Iraq during Phase I, as one shaykh
in Diyala province concluded:
62
emerging local government in decisionmaking
on the tribal militias and U.S. support (financ-
ing, arming, training, intelligence sharing) is
best carried out through the local government
if feasible.
63
ter a handover, and the United States must be
careful about the promises it makes. At times,
the inability to fulfill promises, as perceived by
the locals, generated disillusionment within
the Sahwa about the Americans. As one Sahwa
commander put it:
64
Note: Highlighting the deep-rooted attachment of Yemeni tribes
to their weapons, a little boy says: I wish I were an automatic ri-
fle so that Daddy would love me more and would always take me
with him. See Kamal Sharq, Al-Jumhuriya (Sanaa), June 10, 2014.
65
of an area and lacking government supervision could
well lead to abuses against the civilian population.
Conduct an effective information campaign di-
rected toward the tribes. In particular, U.S. pol-
icy should focus on the enemy and be shaped
to appeal to the tribes. This policy would take
advantage of Al-Qaidas critical vulnerabilities
in ideology and its relationship with a coun-
trys tribal base. Al-Qaida will seek to under-
mine the tribal militias leadership and appeal
to tribal fighters, promising money, playing
on religious sentiments, kinship ties, shame
about cooperating with an occupier and an
apostate local government, It will also play
upon fears that the foreign patron will abandon
the militia and leave the fighters defenseless.
(See Figure 6.)
Note: ISI poster against the Sahwa: A Sahwa member will not get
past the Islamic State of Iraq; there is no place among us for the
Sahwa. Al-Qaidas Al-Luyuth forum, August 2011.
66
At a cruder level, Al-Qaida will intimidate tribal
militias by threatening and carrying out assassina-
tions, kidnapping, and attacks on family members.
(see Figure 7.) Clearly, the United States needs to
neutralize this strategy through both its own informa-
tion effort and with tangible measures that invalidate
such claims.
Note: ISI poster intended to intimidate the Sahwa and Iraqs other
security forces: This is the last thing a Sahwa member, a soldier,
and an apostate policeman see in the Islamic State of Iraq, Al-
Qaida websites, 2010.
67
Even in a Model 2 situation, the United States can
make essential contributions to the success of the trib-
al militias while avoiding direct involvement on the
ground, and should:
Provide funding, arms, selected operational
support, intelligence, and adviceeither in di-
rect support of the local patron government op-
erating jointly with the tribal militia or intend-
ed for the tribal militia but channeled through
the patron local government. For example, in
2013, the United States supplied small arms to
the Iraqi government and specifically urged
the latter to transfer that equipment to the re-
constituted Sahwa.165 In the 2014 campaign in
Yemen, U.S. support to the government forces
came in the form of airstrikes, additional U.S.
arms and equipment, and other U.S. direct op-
erational support, including reportedly flying
Yemeni commandos within the battle zone.166
Although such support may not have been ear-
marked for the Popular Committees, it clearly
also benefited the latter as they operated along-
side the government forces. In another example
of outside support, Saudi Arabia, as noted, has
provided much of the funding for the Popular
Committees in Yemen, funneling that through
the latter countrys Ministry of Defense. Riyadh
has also provided medical evacuation for a key
Committee commander in 2012.
Advise the local government on how to best
deal with the tribal militias. Recently, the U.S.
administration conducted consultations with
Iraqi leaders, suggesting strategy, urging out-
reach to the tribal leaders, and publicly prais-
68
ing Baghdads decision to extend benefits to the
tribal militias.167 In 2014, the U.S. administra-
tion also publicly encouraged the integration
of Sahwa fighters into Iraqs security forces.168
In terms of supporting the Sahwas patron in
combat operations in 2013-14, the United States
helped by having U.S. Special Forces train
Iraqi Special Forces in Jordan and by provid-
ing advice, equipment, and intelligence, and
reportedly launched drone strikes from Jordan
against Al-Qaida targets.169
Advise and support other countries that might
act in the future as potential patrons of tribal
militias use a tool against Al-Qaida. Both Al-
geria and Mali, for example, have considered
tribal militias, while France could become a
sponsor in the Sahel.170
Identify personnel from the U.S. Army and Ma-
rine Corps with operational experience work-
ing with tribal militias, and allow them to act
as instructors for future U.S. operations and as
advisers to allied efforts when they consider
establishing such forces.
AN UPDATE
69
Significantly, as part of the fight against the ISIS,
a U.S.-backed plan emerged for the establishment of
a National Guard as a provincial force which will
include current and former Sahwa fighters in trained
maneuver units armed with heavier weaponry and
meant to reassure Al-Anbar and other predominantly
Sunni areas. Given the reality of the social structures
of the intended areas, tribal loyalties and power re-
lationships will still have to be considered. In effect,
representatives from the United States and Iraq were
said to be negotiating with Sunni tribal shaykhs on
the parameters of this new National Guard, which is
likely to resemble a Sahwa-plus. At the same time,
the retention of a more traditional Sahwa as a comple-
mentary local home guard with a permanent territo-
rial security presence would also be useful.
In the meantime, a resolution of Sunni-Shia differ-
ences on the very need for a National Guard, as well
as on its size, armament, mission, membershipin-
cluding whether to also admit Shia militiamenand
its relationship to the Baghdad government and the
national security forces is still pending. Ultimately,
for the success of any Sunni-based force in the fight
against ISIS, differences on such broader political is-
sues as the role of the former Bath Party and officers
from Saddams army, the presence of resurgent Shia
militias in Sunni areas, the appropriate use of govern-
ment air power, the desirability of Coalition ground
forces in Iraq, amnesty for tribal supporters of ISIS,
and the reform of Army and police structures will still
have to be settled. In whatever way the Sahwa concept
evolves, the issues addressed above will likely still re-
main relevant for any tribally-based society and force.
70
ENDNOTES
71
6. Joe Klein, Saddams Revenge, Time, September 18,
2005, available from content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,
1106307,00.html.
72
15. Jim Michaels, Behind Success in Ramadi an Army Colo-
nels Gamble, USA Today, May 1, 2007, available from www.usa-
today.com/cleanprint/?1291073743841.
16. See, for example, Richard Schultz, The Marines Take An-
bar, Annapolis, MD: U.S. Naval Institute Press, 2013; and Major
Niel Smith and Colonel Sean MacFarland, Anbar Awakens: The
Tipping Point, Military Review, Vol. 88, No. 2, MarchApril
2008, pp. 41-52.
73
22. Ibid., p. 4.
28. Abu Ubayda Abd Allah Khalid Al-Adam (d. 2013), Sahwat
al-ridda wal-sabil li-maniha (The Apostate Sahwas and How to Prevent
Them), Markaz Al-Fajr lil-Alam, April 8, 2012, p. 2.
30. Abbas.
31. Ibid.
74
32. Shaykh Ali Hatim , Interview with Ali Sulayman by Abd
Al-Azhim Muhammad, Al-Mashhad al-iraqi: Tajrubat taslih al-
ashair fi al-Anbar (The Iraqi Scene: The Experiment of Arm-
ing the Tribes in Al-Anbar), Al-Jazira TV (Doha, Qatar), July 29,
2007, transcript available from www.aljazeera.net.
75
39. Al-Sahwa takhsha intiqam Al-Qaida bad insihab al-qu-
wwat al-amirikiya (The Sahwa Fears Al-Qaidas Revenge af-
ter the American Forces Withdraw), Al-Hayat, August 22, 2010,
available from international.daralhayat.com/print/174456.
76
47. Udayy Hatim, Min haraka iraqiya musallaha ila tayyarat
siyasiya (From an Iraqi Armed Movement to Political Fac-
tions), Al-Hayat, November 16, 2008, available from international.
daralhayat.com/print/229160/archive.
77
54. Al-Qaida tutliq hamla li-iqna rijal al-sahwa al-mutad-
hammirin bi-l-awda ilayha (Al-Qaida Launches a Campaign
to Convince Disgruntled Members of the Sahwa to Rejoin It), Al-
Sharq Al-Awsat, August 7, 2010, available from www.aawsat.com/
print.asp?did=580572&issueno=11575.
61. Tim Arango and Kareem Fahim, Iraq Again Uses Sunni
Tribesmen in Militant War, The New York Times, January 19, 2014,
78
available from www.nytimes.com; Jane Arraf, Iraqs Sunni Tribal
Leaders Say Fight for Fallujah Is Part of a Revolution, The Wash-
ington Post, March 12, 2014, available from www.washingtonpost.
com; and Al-Jaysh al-iraqi maduman bil-ashair yakhud maarik
ma DAISH fi Al-Ramadi (The Iraqi Army Supported by the
Tribes Enters into Battle against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria
in Ramadi), Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, January 20, 2014, available from
www.aawsat.com/print.asp?did=758264&issueno=12837.
79
67. Sahwat Al-Iraq: Shuyukh ashair mana bil-nahar wa-
diddana bil-layl (The Sahwa of Iraq: Tribal Shaykhs Are with
Us during the Day and against Us at Night), Al-Jiwar, January 13,
2014, available from www.aljewar.org/print-48093.aspx.
80
72. Wad Al-Shammari, Masadir: 1850 qatilan wa-5 alaf ja-
rih khasair al-jaysh fi Al-Anbar wal-amaliyat tafqud 128 ajalat
Hummer wa-7 mudarraat wa-dabbabtayn (Sources: 1850 Killed
and 5000 Wounded in Al-Anbar and the Operational Force Loses
128 Humvees, 7 Armored Vehicles, and 2 Tanks), Al-Sabah Al-
Jadid, May 11, 2014, available from www.newsabah.com.
81
77. Nima, Al-Anbar takhsha, Rijal al-din bi-Naynawa
yunaddidun bi-DAISH wal-jaysh yastaidd li-taslih al-ashair
al-mahalliya (The Clerics in Naynawa Condemn ISIS and the
Army Is Preparing to Arm the Local Tribes), Mawtini (Baghdad),
June 12, 2014, available from mawtani.al-shorfa.com/ar/articles/iii/
features/2014/06/12/feature01.
82
php?storyid=56895; Ashair Kab fi Al-Basra tulin tatawwuha lil-
difa an al-watan wal-muqaddasat (The Kab Tribes in Basra De-
clare They Are Volunteering to Defend the Nation and the Holy
Places), Al-Sabah Al-Jadid, June 17, 2014, available from www.
newsabah.com/wp/newspaper/9017; and Indammat quwwat maja-
lis al-isnad wal-sahwat ila al-mutatawwiin li-muharabat DAISH
al-irhabi talbiyatan li-dawat al-marjaiya al-diniyaal-ulya wa-ula-
ma al-muslimin min jami al-tawaif (The Forces of the Support
Councils and the Sahwa Join the Volunteers to Fight the Terrorist
ISIS in Response to the Call by the Supreme Religious Author-
ity and the Muslim Ulama of All Sects), Al-Sabah, June 17, 2014,
available from www.alsabaah.iq/ArticlePrint.aspx?ID=72941.
85. Liz Sly, Maliki Tightens His Grip on Power, The Wash-
ington Post, June 18, 2014, pp. A1, A4.
83
88. Ansar Al-Sharia yulinun an istratijiya jadida wa-taktikat
mukhtalifa li-harb mudun wasafuha bil-anifa (The Ansar Al-
Sharia Announce a New Strategy and Different Tactics for Urban
Operations, Which They Describe As Violent), Taqrir Ikhbari, Ma-
dad Al-Ikhbariya, No. 1, September 2011, p. 1.
84
95. Iqamat al-hudud al-shariya fi madinat Jaar (Imple-
menting the Legal Penalties in the City of Jaar), Taqrir Ikhbari,
Madad Al-Ikhbariya, No. 2, October 2011, p. 2; and Ansar al-Sharia
yaqbidun ala sahir fi Jaar (The Ansar Al-Sharia Arrest a Sor-
cerer in Jaar), Taqrir Ikhbari, Madad Al-Ikhbariya, No. 3, October
2011, p. 2.
85
100. Shahid bil-vidiyu: Anasir Al-Qaida yudimun muwatin
bi-madinat Jaar janub Al-Yaman (See the Video: Al-Qaida Ele-
ments Execute a Citizen in the City of Jaar in South Yemen), Aden
Al-Ghad (Aden), September 30, 2011, available from adenalghad.
net/printpost/3978.
105. Ibid.; and Ihtijajan ala taslim mustahaqqathim ila ahad al-
mashaikh al-lijan al-shabiya tunazhzhim waqfa ihtijajiya amam
manzil muhafizh Abyan wa-tuhaddid al-tasid (Complaining
That Their Salaries Are Disbursed Through a Tribal Leader, the
Popular Committees Stage a Protest in Front of the Governor of
Abyans Residence and Threaten to Escalate), Akhbar Al-Yawm,
December 30, 2012, available from www.akhbaralyom.net/nprint.
php?lng=arabic&sid=63050.
86
dukhul anasir qaidiya wa-huthiya (In a Meeting That Brought
Together District Governors and Popular Committee Leaders in
Lahij, Al-Majidi Confirms the Formation of Committees from the
Unemployed and Al-Sabihi Warns about Al-Qaida and Houthi
Elements Joining), Akhbar Al-Yawm, October 23, 2012, available
from akhbaralyom.net/nprint.php?lng=arabic&sid=60616; and Zun-
jubar: Insihab Al-Qaida wal-dawla aydan (Zunjubar: The Re-
treat of Al-Qaida and Also of Its State), Aden Al-Ghad, July 13,
2013, available from adenalghad.net/printpost/57519.
87
the 111th Brigade in Abyan Including 4 Officers Involved in Col-
luding with Al-Qaida), Yemen Press (Sanaa), December 7, 2013,
available from yemen-press.com/news25139.html.
88
118. Masul amni yamani lil-Sharq: Al-Qaida taghtal 10 ju-
nud muqabil maqtal ayy unsur minha bil-tairat al-amrikiya (A
Yemeni Security Official Tells Al-Sharq: Al-Qaida Kills 10 Soldiers
for Every One of Its Members That American Aircraft Kill), Al-
Sharq (Najran, Saudi Arabia), February 4, 2013.
89
126. Al-Rais wal-dakhiliya yatarifan bi-tazayud khatar Al-
Qaida (The President and the Ministry of the Interior Admit to
a Rising Threat from Al-Qaida), Al-Wasat, May 21, 2014, avail-
able from alwasat-ye.net/index.php?ac=3&no=39142&d_f=15&t_
f=0&t=5&lang_in=Ar.
128. Al-Qabd ala irhabi hawal al-tasallul ila ihda thuknat al-
junud fi Shabwa (Seizure of a Terrorist Who Tried to Penetrate
One of the Military Barracks), Yemeni Ministry of the Interior
website, May 8, 2014, available from www.smc.gov.ye; and Al-
Uthur ala asliha wa-mutafajjirat fi manzil ahad ada Al-Qaida bi-
Abyan (The Discovery of Arms and Explosives in the House of
an Al-Qaida Member in Abyan), 14 Uktubir, May 8, 2014, avail-
able from www.14october.com/news.aspx?newsno=3070873.
90
132. Rais majlis qabail Bakil lil-silm wal-islah al-shaykh
Afraj: Qabail al-Yaman tarfud an tatahawwal ila adat fi al-harb
ala Al-Qaida (Shaykh Afraj, the Head of the Bakil Tribal Con-
federation Council, Who Supports Peace and Reform: Yemens
Tribes Refuse to Become a Tool in the War against Al-Qaida), Al-
Wasat (Manama, Bahrain), January 9, 2010, available from www.
alwasatnews.com/2692/news/read/362750/1.html.
133. Ibid.
138. Raghavan.
91
141. Muhammad Al-Abasi, Bil-Wathaiq fasad wizarat al-
difa al-yamaniya yaltahim mukhassasat al-lijan al-shabiya fi Aby-
an (Documentary Proof of Corruption in Yemens Ministry of
Defense Gobbling Up the Allocations for the Popular Committees
in Abyan), Sabq News (Yemen), March 7, 2013.
92
147. Safiya Al-Awdhali, Al-Jaysh yaqtahim Al-Majala wal-
Mahfad fi Abyan wa-Mayfaa fi Shabwa (The Army Enters Al-
Majala and Al-Mahfad in Abyan and Al-Mayfaa in Shabwa), Al-
Yaman Al-Yawm, May 2, 2014, available from www.yemen-today.
net/DetailsNews.aspx?Id=13196.
93
155. Al-Lijan bi-Abyan tulin tayidha li-matalib al-mutadar-
rarin wa-tumhil al-rais 3 ayyam li-iqalat al-muhafizh (The Com-
mittees in Abyan Declare Their Support for Those Who Suffered
Damage and Give the President a Deadline of 3 Days in Which to
Remove the Governor), Akhbar Al-Yawm, June 14, 2014, available
from www.akhbaralyom.net/nprint.php?lng=arabic&sid=80103.
94
162. One intellectual who was skeptical of the effect of tribal-
ism on the prospects for democracy in Iraq even blamed the Unit-
ed States for having reinvigorated tribalism as part of its coun-
terinsurgency strategy, Hasan Nazhim, Ijtithath al-ashairiya
(Detribalization), Al-Alam, January 24, 2010, available from
www.alaalem.com/index.php?aa=news&id22=1187. Such feelings
were present in Yemen as well, Arif BaMumin, Al-Lijan al-
shabiya fi Hadramawt bayn al-rafd wal-qubul (The Popular
Committees in Hadramawt: To Refuse Or Accept), Hadramawt
Al-Yawm (Yemen), November 14, 2013, available from hadramout-
today.net/45303.html.
95
167. White House Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jay Car-
ney, January 8, 2014, available from www.whitehouse.gov/photos-
and-video/video/2014/01/08/press-briefings#transcript.
169. Missy Ryan, U.S. Special Forces Sent to Train Iraqi Spe-
cial Forces in Jordan, Reuters, March 7, 2014, available from www.
reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USBREA261O420140307; Michael R.
Gordon and Eric Schmitt, U.S. Sends Arms to Aid Iraq Fight With
Extremists, New York Times, December 25, 2013, available from
www.nytimes.com; Qassim Abdul-zahra and Adam Schreck, Iraq
Turns to Sunni Tribes, But Distrust Remains, Army Times, Febru-
ary 13, 2014, available from www.armytimes.com; U.S. Drones to
the Rescue in Iraq: Strikes Target Al Qaida Strongholds, World
Tribune (Springfield, VA), January 19, 2014, available from www.
worldtribune.com; and Loveday Morris, Interview with Prime
Minister Nouri Al-Maliki: Transcript, The Washington Post, Janu-
ary 16, 2014, available from www.washingtonpost.com.
96
U.S. ARMY WAR COLLEGE
*****
Director
Professor Douglas C. Lovelace, Jr.
Director of Research
Dr. Steven K. Metz
Author
Dr. Norman Cigar
Publications Assistant
Ms. Rita A. Rummel
*****
Composition
Mrs. Jennifer E. Nevil
FOR THIS AND OTHER PUBLICATIONS, VISIT US AT
http://www.carlisle.army.mil/