Optimal Coordination of Directional Overcurrent Relays: A Genetic Algorithm Approach
Optimal Coordination of Directional Overcurrent Relays: A Genetic Algorithm Approach
Optimal Coordination of Directional Overcurrent Relays: A Genetic Algorithm Approach
Dr. S. Gupta
M.Tech.(Computer Technology),Student
Department Of Electrical Engineering
National Institute Of Technology
Raipur, India
e-mail: [email protected]
B.
T = f(TDS, Ip, I)
(2)
K1* TDS
I
K2
CT Ratio* Ip
+K3
(3)
min
n
i=1
Ti
Where K1, K2 and K3 are constants that depend upon the Where, n represents the number of relays.
specific device being simulated.
III. GENETIC ALGORITHM
The following two cases have been considered in this paper
Genetic algorithm (GA) is a search technique used
for obtaining the objective function and minimizing it.
in computing, to
find
exact
or approximate solutions
Case I
to optimization and search problems. Genetic algorithms
are categorized as global search heuristics [6]-[7]. Genetic
The linear equation is formulated in terms of TDS by taking
algorithms are a particular class of evolutionary algorithms (EA)
Ip to be constant at a particular value in (3)
that use techniques inspired by evolutionary biology such
Case II
as inheritance, mutation, selection, and crossover [8]-[9].
The non-linear equation is formulated in terms of Ip by taking
A. Terminologies Related To Genetic Algorithm
TDS to be constant at a particular value in (3).
x Fitness functionA fitness function is a particular type
B. Relay Settings
of objective function that prescribes the optimality of a
solution (that is, a chromosome) in a genetic algorithm
The calculation of the two settings, TDS and Ip, is the
so that particular chromosome may be ranked against
essence of the directional overcurrent relay coordination study.
all the other chromosomes.
In general, directional overcurrent relays allow for continuous
x
ChromosomeIn genetic algorithms, a chromosome is
time dial settings but discrete pickup current settings.
a set of parameters which define a proposed solution to
Therefore this constraint can be formulated as:
the problem that the genetic algorithm is trying to
solve. The chromosome is often represented as a simple
string, although a wide variety of other data structures
TDSi min TDSi TDSi max
are also used.
x SelectionDuring each successive generation, a
proportion of the existing population is selected to
IPimin IPi IPimax
breed a new generation. Individual solutions are
selected through a fitness-based process, where fitter
C. Coordination Problem
solutions are typically more likely to be selected.
x
ReproductionThe next step is to generate a second
In any power system, a primary protection has its own
generation population of solutions from those selected
backup one for guaranteeing a dependable power system. The
through crossover and mutation.
two protective systems (primary and back-up) should be
For each new solution to be produced, a pair of
coordinated together. Coordination time interval (CTI) is the
"parent" solutions is selected for breeding from the pool
criteria to be considered for coordination. Its a predefined
selected previously. By producing a "child" solution
coordination time interval and it depends on the type of relays.
using the above methods of crossover and mutation, a
For electromagnetic relays, CTI is of the order of 0.3 to 0.4 s,
new solution is created which typically shares many of
while for a microprocessor based relay, it is of the order of 0.1
the characteristics of its "parents". New parents are
to 0.2 s.
selected for each new child, and the process continues
SCEECS 2012
Create a Population of
Chromosomes
Determine The Fitness of
Each Evaluation
> n Gen.
yes
Display
Results
no
Select Next Generation
Perform Reproduction Using
crossover
Perform Mutation
Figure 2. Six bus test system
Figure 1. Flow chart
TABLE I.
V.
PROPOSED ALGORITHM
Relay No.
CT Ratio
CT RATIO
Relay No.
CT Ratio
1200/5
800/5
800/5
800/5
800/5
10
600/5
800/5
11
800/5
800/5
12
800/5
1200/5
13
1200/5
800/5
14
800/5
SCEECS 2012
Fault Current
(KA)
Primary
Relay
Fault Current
(KA)
TABLE IV.
Pickup
Current
Obtained
Values (A)
Pickup
Current
Obtained
Values (A)
4.5890
6.0720
Ip1
0.6700
Ip8
0.5000
4.5890
14
5.4570
Ip2
0.5000
Ip9
0.5000
0.8680
2.3510
Ip3
0.5000
Ip10
0.5000
0.8680
14
5.4570
Ip4
0.5000
Ip11
0.5000
1.3650
4.8030
Ip5
0.5000
Ip12
0.8660
0.5528
30.5470
Ip6
0.5000
Ip13
0.5000
0.9770
13
17.8210
Ip7
0.5350
Ip14
0.5680
0.8610
12
17.7050
1.4830
2.3510
1.4830
6.0720
0.7670
18.3380
0.6390
10
4.0770
10
0.9455
11
30.9390
11
1.0740
2.8380
11
1.0740
4.4960
12
3.4220
5.1860
12
3.4220
4.4960
13
0.6010
18.1720
14
1.7640
5.1860
14
1.7640
2.8380
VI.
CONCLUSION
TABLE III.
Time Dial
Setting
Time Dial
Setting
Obtained
Values (A)
TDS1
0.55647
TDS8
0.50000
TDS2
0.50010
TDS9
0.50003
TDS3
0.50000
TDS10
0.50000
TDS4
0.50004
TDS11
0.50000
TDS5
0.50002
TDS12
0.59127
TDS6
0.50000
TDS13
0.50000
TDS7
0.51584
TDS14
0.52268
SCEECS 2012