Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 229 views

    II Ulllllllllll Ill: Document Scanning Lead Sheet

    Uploaded by

    L. A. Paterson
    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER CO., Plaintiff, vs. MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT, ET AL., Defendants. AND RELATED CROSS ACTIONS, Case No. CGC- 13-528312

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    II Ulllllllllll Ill: Document Scanning Lead Sheet

    Uploaded by

    L. A. Paterson
    229 views3 pages
    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER CO., Plaintiff, vs. MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT, ET AL., Defendants. AND RELATED CROSS ACTIONS, Case No. CGC- 13-528312

    Original Title

    ORDER CGC-13-528312 10-10-13

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER CO., Plaintiff, vs. MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT, ET AL., Defendants. AND RELATED CROSS ACTIONS, Case No. CGC- 13-528312

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    229 views3 pages

    II Ulllllllllll Ill: Document Scanning Lead Sheet

    Uploaded by

    L. A. Paterson
    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER CO., Plaintiff, vs. MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT, ET AL., Defendants. AND RELATED CROSS ACTIONS, Case No. CGC- 13-528312

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    I Ulllllllllll UIl ~II

    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA


    COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

    Document Scanning Lead Sheet


    Oct-10-2013 11:23 am

    Case Number: CGC-13-528312


    Filing Date: Oct-1 0-2013 11 :23
    Filed by: SHAWNA VANTREE
    Juke Box: 001

    Image: 04233725

    ORDER

    CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CO VS. MARINA


    COAST WATER DISTRICT et al

    001C04233725

    Instructions:
    Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.

    F I ~nty
    IE D

    SBtl FtanoisPo

    Superior Court

    OCT 1 QZ01J

    8~CL~~:T~~RT

    Deputy Clerk

    6
    7

    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

    COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

    10

    CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER CO.,

    11

    12
    13
    14

    15
    16

    Case No. CGC-13-528312

    Plaintiff,
    vs.
    MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT, ET
    AL.,

    CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FOR


    October I 0, 2013

    Defendants.

    AND RELATED CROSS ACTIONS

    17

    18

    I conducted a case management conference (CMC) this date.

    19

    The next CMC is set for 9:00a.m., November 15,2013. The parties' joint CMC

    20

    statement should address (I) the proposed pretrial schedule I provide below; (2) any objections

    21

    to the phraseology of issues to be decided, provided below; (3) the names of live witnesses for

    22

    the Phase I trial, a very brief summary of their expected testimony, and a reasonable (not

    23
    exaggerated) estimate of the time needed for direct. I may use these estimates, and other
    24
    25

    26
    27

    information, to impose overall time limits at trial.


    Issues to be decided. Based on the parties' views as stated in the various CMC statements
    filed in this matter, the issues to be decided at the Phase I trial appear to be:

    -I-

    1. Did the CPUC make a final approval of the Agreements, and if so does this bar the

    court's further consideration of the plaintiffs claims?

    3
    2. Are plaintiffs claims barred by a statute oflimitations under the Validating Act?

    3. Is there a violation ofGovt. C. 1090? If so, are the Agreements void (ab initio or

    otherwise) or invalid as a result?

    6
    7
    8

    Proposed schedule.

    9
    Parties exchange deposition designations: January 14,2014
    10
    Parties exchange deposition counter designations and objections: January 21,2014
    11

    Parties exchange exhibit lists and exhibits: January 21,2014

    12
    13

    File Motions in limine (MILs)? January 14, 2014

    14

    File oppositions to MILs: January 21, 2014

    15

    Hearing on MILs & final pretrial conference: January 28, 2014 9:00a.m.

    16

    File trial briefs: January 31,2014

    17
    Phase 1 trial: February 3-4,2015
    18
    19
    20

    Dated: October 10, 2013


    Curtis E.A. Kamow
    Judge of The Superior Court

    21

    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27

    I understand that Marina Coast believes the first two issues will be disposed on summary judgment. They may or
    may not be, and the parties should not assume the motion will be decided in time to make much of a difference to
    trial planning.
    2
    Counsel must be familiar with these cases before drafting MILs. Amtower v. Photon Dynamics, Inc., !58
    Cai.App.4th 1582 (2008); Kelly v. New West Federal Savings, 49 Cai.App.4th 659 (1996); and R & B Auto Center,
    Inc. v. Farmers Group, Inc., 140 Cai.App.4th 327 (2006) (Rylaarsdam, Acting P.J., concurring). No MIL should be
    filed unless it is impractical to raise the issue at trial. MILs should not be used to highlight or forecast an issue for
    the Court: That is a function of the trial brief.

    . 2-

    You might also like