VII of If l0 N N Will: Deposits
VII of If l0 N N Will: Deposits
VII of If l0 N N Will: Deposits
rr point
grades
nulatbn of blocks,
,ariarrce C"(h) or
lriabitrity of support
a regularization on
h) b3z means of the
:la (II-4 I ). In pracre d.iscrete approxiC6, corresponding
,se
tozero,
ea
pbri
the n the
dispersion
0)- As an example
rangc a, a sufficient
r/4 can be obtained
could arisc with storage and calcutation time. Cuts in computer time can be
obtaincd, firsr by kriging only the N blocks, aod second by simulating and
kriging directly these N blocks, as shown in the.following scction'
A. Carry
z,(r) = cr"lu,(r\-
points.)
D.
E.
ielectioo is always
>f sample grades),
iabilily or the uniThe cntire simulae., lhc information
5rl
2.
DEPOSITS
F,
From the hisrogram of the simulated values 2,.,(x ). deterrnine cxperimentally thc Caussian transform f unction for a support u, i'e" z'-'(x ):
values can be
ez.{u"',(x)l.Once 94 is known, the Caussian simulated
deduccd f rom ,,., (, )l 9 | {2,., (r )i. Note that' since rhe function 'p il is'
in general, non-linear, u,.,(r ) * (l /n ) t, u,(', )
Using the Gaussian simulated values 1,.,(r ) and a,(xo )' simulate the
kriging error Ia,., (x )- r, i.,* {r )1. The kriged value a i., x (r } is a linear
combinatiort of the simulate<J values u, (x. ) at the data points r. e /' i'e''
ui.,*(r)=I"4.(.t). u,(r"). ln the kriging systcnr. thc lirst memtrer
matrix consisrs of the experimental covariances E{g,(r )u,(y )} and the
sccond mcmber matrix consists of E{n,(r )r.,.,(y )}'
Calculatc rhe krigcd valucsof the blocks which are linear combinations
*i
i
I
MININ(; CEOSTATISTICS
)I]
th,:
ie.' r'i1r;=
thc irrrtial rransformed valucs rr('r")= e)t"lzu$")l'
oI
I,.,r.(t,). rr(.r.). Notc
A"(r)
are idcntical to
(.r
;+ [rr,.,('r)- rrl'*(.t )l
H.Firrally.tlterequlrcdctlrrtlitionalsinlulationofblockgradcsrsobtaincd
for thc
de rcrnrincd (in srep D)function 92rhc
by'rrtcattsof
fruiously
suPl'rorlr"ic.
2,.,.(x ) = 97. ( rr,.,.(r
-llris
itr;tt
simulalron
musl i)c c(r
in t1t pc n dt
I
ti nc rr>l
ll()n
e(ir
1(,
at (ire
san'
lhis. thc d
gnd (r-, .r
bc lrss lh
data (x.,,
locatrons
))
'
of nN point vtllues
blocks' Howcver' the condrlioning
a non-conclitional srmulation
1>rt.lccdtrrc rcquires
N
rr,(x ). n valrtcs for each tlf thc
u' rather than krigingall nN Pornts'
N
blocks
;;;;r, rcqurrcs krigingonly
thc nN point valucs is still
lf, howe-ver. rhc nonc<l"nditional simulation of
blt>cks
*"tfto<J of direct conditioning of thc N
rct<t costly' thcn the ritl'a
should bc ustd'
i(r..
-l-
vulue rif t
thc smool
where
rr:ai data
zciLl exp
outlined in section
vartous p"rrn"n"nt" of aistriUution techniques
Z"(r) can be deduced
RF
rhe univariare oirt,iUution of the regularized
for instance' to the
fitted'
RF
point
of the
f rom thc univariate distribution
of Z'(r)
distribution
This
lenglhs'
cxperimental hislogram of core sample
canalsobederlucedfromproductiondataorfromcontroldataattheentry
to the milling Process'
and the distribution of 2.,
once the structural function (C,(h) or 7,(h))
the block grades can be
of
zo'(x)
31g known, a non-conditional simulation
process poses a
conditioning
carried out directly. However, the subsequent
few problems.
on a supPort diflerent from
The conditional dara aiL-in general, defined
core sample lengths for instancc' Now'
u, such as the quasi-point suppx'rt of
rcquircd'in the conciitioning formula (VIl'3):
cL:nStruc(
lrue Srad
This latt<
7,,(li ), cf .
This r
rrpproxin
k
rigcd vi
rs only'c-l
thc spati
only rvht
rrnit u
clispe rsic
Once
conditio
point
ca:
2,.,.(r ) = z jx (r )+
,:
E
I
IL
The !
tiorring
kriging