Scribd
Upload
54 views

Criteria: Lab Rubric: Written Report 4 3 2 1

The document provides a rubric for grading written lab reports with criteria in four categories: 1) Title and abstract, 2) Introduction (purpose, background, hypothesis), 3) Methods (procedure, materials, results), and 4) Analysis and discussion (data presentation, analysis, errors, conclusions). Each category contains several elements that must be included and addressed for full credit. Higher scores are given for thorough, accurate, and logical explanations, while lower scores reflect missing, inaccurate, or disorganized content.

Uploaded by

Mark
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
54 views

Criteria: Lab Rubric: Written Report 4 3 2 1

The document provides a rubric for grading written lab reports with criteria in four categories: 1) Title and abstract, 2) Introduction (purpose, background, hypothesis), 3) Methods (procedure, materials, results), and 4) Analysis and discussion (data presentation, analysis, errors, conclusions). Each category contains several elements that must be included and addressed for full credit. Higher scores are given for thorough, accurate, and logical explanations, while lower scores reflect missing, inaccurate, or disorganized content.

Uploaded by

Mark
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Criteria

Lab Rubric: Written Report


4
3

Title:Title accurately described the work and included


independent variables and author.
Includes scientific names of organisms used.
Abstract:No more than 200 words
Includes a brief summary of the purpose, hypothesis
procedure results and conclusion
Purpose: Purpose is logical, answerable, and relevantthe purpose is the reason for conducting the
investigation . The main focus is on the relevance of
the investigation. Mentioning dependent and
independent variables is not necessary in this section.
Background: Identifies and explains all relevant
scientific concepts related to the research by
explaining the following in detail:

general topic

entity (organism studies when applicable)

Independent variable (s)

dependent variable
*No Data or results from the lab should appear in this
section
Hypothesis/Prediction: is testable. Uses accurate
scientific concepts to explain the hypothesis.
Remember your hypothesis is your idea, based on
scientific knowledge applied to the specifics of your
investigation.
Prediction is in if (the independent variable) then (how
the dependent variable will respond) format. The
prediction is specifically connected to the procedure for
this investigation.
Methods:
Procedure:

Accurately tests the hypotheses

contains sufficient number of trials

Written in a step by step list format

Includes specific reproducible details

Includes all safety concerns

Includes pictures of the apparatus, when


applicable
Components of Experimental Design:

Identifies constants and explains why they


must remain constant

Identifies the experimental and control


groups

Identifies the Independent variable(s)

Describes how results will be measured to


confirm hypothesis/prediction (dependent
variable)

Title includes all


guidelines
All criteria are met in
a coherent
organized paragraph
Purpose is logical,
answerable and
relevant. It is
consistent with
scientific
knowledge/relevant

Most criteria are


met, paragraph
lacks organization
Purpose is
answerable, but it
lacks a good reason
for conducting the
experiment.

Graphs: Placed underneath or after data tables,


provided proper graph type, labeled axes, legend,
descriptive titles Included labels such as Fig. 1, Fig. 2
etc, Provide a visual answer to the question posed in
the investigation.
Results Summary: Includes enough summary Data w/
units from each experimental group is summarized in a
clear, concise, logical manner. Patterns are identified,
and described but no conclusions are drawn
Any mistakes made when conducting the lab should be
mentioned here.

Missing several
criteria, OR not in a
paragraph
Purpose is present but
relevance is not
mentioned and/or the
purpose is not
consistent with
scientific knowledge.

Includes most
criteria, lacks
explanation contains
incorrect/inaccurate
explanations or
missing several
essentail concepts.

Includes few criteria,


lacks explanation or
contains
incorrect/inaccurate
explanations

All Criteria are met in


a well organized
paragraph(s).

Includes all criteria


but lacks detailed
explanation of
scientific concepts
or is missing one
essential concepts.

Proper format, all


criteria met.
Hypothesis clearly
explains why you
made the prediction,
using the science
presented in your
background.

Hypothesis and/or
prediction are
consistent with each
other and the
science, but lacks
clear explanation

Either hypothesis
OR prediction are
not accurate or not
clearly explained

Format is not followed


OR hypothesis/
prediction is
inconsistent with
science.

All Criteria are met

A few criteria are


missing

Several criteria are


missing

Missing a significant
portion of the criteria

All Criteria are met

One criteria is
missing

Two are missing

One is missing

Materials:Complete detailed list of the material is


presented (size, concentrations, quantity)
Statistical Tests
Calculations,formulas and statistical methods were
included.
Formulas written out as formulas
Results
Data Tables: Includes both raw data and summary
data with correct units and descriptive titles. Included
labels such as Table 1, Table 2..

Detailed list of
materials was included
Formulas and
statistical tests
performed included
and explained.
All criteria met,
labels are included
on the same page
as tables, tables
logically organized
All Criteria are met
Graphs are logical
and display an
answer to the
question posed in
the investigation.

All criteria are met,


tables could be
organized better, are
split between pages,
or contain blank
cells.
Some criteria met.
Graphs are logical
and display an
answer to the
question posed in
the investigation.

All criteria were met.

Some criteria missing


and tables lack
organization
Graphs are illogical
and do not display a
visual answer to the
question posed in the
investigation.
Few criteria met. Little
data is included
includes explanations
of data

Data Analysis and Discussion: Follows what a


scientific explanation looks like guidelines
Opens by comparing the results to the hypothesis.
(Claim)
Uses specific summary data w/ units from lab to support
if hypothesis was supported. (evidence)
Explains data by identifying trends & connecting them to
scientific concepts mentioned in introduction, sci.
concepts are defined, Explanation is logical and
accurate (reasoning)

All Criteria are met in


a logical flow.
Summarizes data in
light of the original
question posed in the
investigation and
uses scientific
concepts to explain
data in a way that
reflects a deeper
understanding of the
topic.

Most Criteria met.


Does not
summarizes data in
light of the original
question posed OR
does not use
scientific concepts to
explain data in a
way that reflects a
deeper
understanding of the
topic.

Experimental Error and Accuracy of Data


Accurate sources of error identified and explained.
Error explanation does not include mistakes you may
have made while conducting the lab. Error analysis
involves:

sample size discussion

spread of data

includes suggested procedural change(s) that


are necessary based on this error.
Further Investigation Specific testable question
generated for further research. New question/purpose,
changes in procedure, and prediction all included.
This must be a new independent variable and
cannot be a variable that others in the class already
tested/explored

All criteria are met,


new investigation is
logical

Conclusion: Summarizes the relevance and


addresses what was learned f from the data gathered
in this investigation..
Conventions: Proper spelling, grammar,paragraphs
are organized in a logical flow
Literature Cited; In text citations are present and follow
APA format, contains a works cited.
Visual Appeal Paper has proper formatting- each
section has a heading, headings are on same page as
sections they head, reflects order of rubric, double
spaced

Some criteria met


and lacks an overall
summary referring
back to original
question.
Explanations lack
inclusion of scientific
concepts or may
contain
inaccuracies.

Few criteria met, does


not summarize data in
light of original
question asked, and
contains inaccurate
explanations.

Addresses both
issues of sample
size and of the
spread of the data
(standard deviation
values when
possible)
Makes
recommendations to
eliminate error.

Is missing one or more


of the elements

All criteria are met,


new investigation
lacks logic, OR one
of the criteria was
not met

Few criteria met and/or


investigation lacks
logic
OR several ideas are
presented without
development

Both criteria are met

One of the criteria was


not addressed
effectively

All criteria are met

You forgot to
proofread!

All criteria met

All criteria are met

Missing one of the


listed guidelines

Citations are not in


APA format
Missing two of the
guidelines

Total

/ 50

You might also like