Esi PPT Group9 DivB
Esi PPT Group9 DivB
Esi PPT Group9 DivB
Archit Aggarwal
Abhiram PVK B047
Deepika Raghuwanshi B051
Mayank Kishore
Rahul Chawla
Ritika Mandora
Rishabh Prasad B050
Contents
Introduction
Evolution of Indices
Advantages
Conclusion
Sustainability Index
Sustainability Dashboard
Types
Evolution
Dow Jones
Index
DJSI World
DJSI Regions
DJSI Countries
Assessment Criteria
%
33%
100%
57%
33%
47%
33%
Economic
Dimension
Social
Dimension
Environmental
Dimension
Total
Industry Criteria
General Criteria
Weighting (in%)
Corporate Governance
6.0
6.0
6.0
Depends on Industry
Environmental
Weighting (in%)
Environmental Reporting*
3.0
Depends on Industry
Social
Weighting (in%)
5.5
5.5
5.0
3.0
Social Reporting*
3.0
Depends on Industry
Criticism
Self-reported
data
Only large
companies
included
Biased
Information
Company
questionnai
re
Company
documentation
Company
contact
Media &
stakeholder
analysis
Skewed
towards
economic
criteria
Stranded assets such as coal or fossil fuel reserves owned by utilities will be written off
if these Indices are not developed as solutions
MSCI ESG Environmental Indexes provide Low Carbon, Fossil Fuels Exclusion
and Thematic alternatives for investors.
The MSCI Thematic Indexes are intended to identify companies with positive
environmental impact for investors looking for thematic investment opportunities.
Since 2008, the World Bank has issued more than $7 billion in green bonds in 17
currencies, and the International Finance Corporation has issued $3.7 billion in
green bonds
The World Bank and IFC have helped pioneer the green bond market and raise
awareness about the opportunities in climate-friendly investment
Proceeds from World Bank and IFC green bonds are used to support renewable
energy, energy efficiency, sustainable transportation and other low-carbon projects,
as well as financing for forest and watershed management, and infrastructure to
prevent climate-related flood damage and build climate resilience
Protection of ecosystems.
Assessment
Criticism
Does not meet its challenges completely, in particular due to the lack
of data for certain environmental policy areas
EPI does not meet its challenges completely, in particular due to the
lack of data for certain environmental policy areas:
Freshwater quality
Nuclear safety
Wetlands loss
Recycling rates
Desertification
Company Examples
Benefits
Build Network
Gain Buy-In
Improve Reporting
Elevate Reputation
Conclusion
Strengths of ESI
Weaknesses
Lacks time series data which limits ability to identify policy drivers
References
http://www.sustainability-indices.com/
http://www.djindexes.com/mdsidx/downloads/meth_info/Dow_Jones_Su
stainability_Indices_Methodology.pdf
http://www.djindexes.com/sustainability/
http://epi.yale.edu/epi
http://www.ecologic.eu
http://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/104/04/0435.pdf
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/angel-hsu/the-2014-environmentalpe_b_4797786.html
http://www.worldenergy.org/