SCOR 9.0r
SCOR 9.0r
SCOR 9.0r
Version 9.0
Acknowledgments
The following members (alphabetical by company) of the Supply-Chain Council Technical Development
Steering Committee and Project Teams devoted extensive time and/or effort to the development of this
Model SCOR Version 9.0. Also included are those who devoted much time and experience sharing
to develop the section that is now being published separately as a White Paper by the Supply-Chain
Council on Financial Impact of SCOR Metrics and Best Practices.
Name
Gerard McCool
Kevin F. Mansfield
Ben Cromwell
Greg Grehawick
Jrg Nienhaus
Arne Ziegenbein
Moses Muputisi
Kevin Farrington
Robert Mansfield
Kevin McCormack
Lars Magnusson
Charles-Eric Roussel
Sven Verstrepen
Srinivasan Sarangapani
Reinaldo Fioravanti
David Morrow
Changrui Ren
Jin Dong
Gopal Chandrasekaran
John Paul
Hitesh Patel
Anand K. Sundar
Mitul Devendra Shah
Robert Hagan
James Wynn
Taylor Wilkerson
Iain D. Clarke
Ray VanderBok
Melinda Davey
Marc Bartos
Dan Swartwood
Monty Boyle
George Wellock
Caspar Hunsche
Sam Fayez
Tom Janoshalmi
Deanna Yee
Joseph Francis
Enrico Camerinelli
Melinda Spring
Scott Sealing
John Nyere
Sergio Cavalieri
Jac Braat
Nancy Craft
Amy H Buu
Ikhlaq Kashkari
Company
Accenture
Air Products
AIT Group
Booz Allen Hamilton
Bosch
Bosch
BP
Brightstar
CCAT
DRK Research
Ericsson
Essilor France
Flanders Institute for Logistics
Genpact
Hewlett Packard
IBM
IBM China
IBM China
IBM GBS
iCognitive
IDS Scheer
Infinite Strategies, Inc.
Infosys
International Paper
Knowles Electronics
LMI
Molson Coors Brewing Company
NewVectors
NewVectors
PMG Benchmarking
Pragmatek
Pragmatek
Pragmatek
Process Core Group
Productivity Apex
SAP
Satellite Logistics Group
Supply Chain Council
Supply-Chain Council
Supply-Chain Council
United Space Alliance
United States Department of Defense
University of Bergamo
University of Tilburg
Volvo
Westinghouse
Xelocity
Table of Contents
Introduction
Metrics
o Reliability
o Responsiveness
o Agility
o Cost
o Asset Management
Processes
o Plan
o Source
o Make
o Deliver
o Return
o Inputs and Outputs
Best Practices
o SCOR
o GreenSCOR
o Risk Management
Special Applications
o GreenSCOR
1
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
5
5.1
Section 1
Introduction
Introduction
Summary
The Supply-Chain Operations Reference model (SCOR) is the product of the Supply-Chain
Council (SCC) a global non-profit consortium whose methodology, diagnostic and benchmarking tools
help organizations make dramatic and rapid improvements in supply-chain processes. SCC established
the SCOR process reference model for evaluating and comparing supply-chain activities and performance.
The SCOR-model captures the Councils consensus view of supply chain management. It provides a unique
framework that links business process, metrics, best practices and technology into a unified structure to
support communication among supply chain partners and to improve the effectiveness of supply chain
management and related supply chain improvement activities. SCC membership is open to all companies
and organizations interested in applying and advancing the state-of-the-art in supply-chain management
systems and practices.
The SCC was organized in 1996 and initially included 69 practitioner companies meeting in an
informal consortium. Subsequently, the companies of the Council elected to form an independent not
for profit trade association. The majority of the SCCs members are practitioners and represent a broad
cross-section of industries, including manufacturers, distributors, and retailers. Equally important to
the Council and the advancement of the SCOR-model are the technology suppliers and implementers,
the academicians, and the government organizations that participate in Council activities and the
development and maintenance of the Model. At the time of this release, the Council has approximately
800 corporate members worldwide and has established international chapters in Australia/New Zealand,
Latin America, Greater China, Europe, Japan, Southeast Asia, and Southern Africa with additional requests
for regional chapters pending.
The Supply-Chain Council is interested in providing the widest possible dissemination of the
SCOR-model. The wide-spread use of the Model results in better customer-supplier relationships, software
systems that can better support members through the use of common measurements and terms, and the
ability to rapidly recognize and adopt best practice no matter where it originates. SCC requests that all
who use the SCOR-model provide attribution to the Supply-Chain Council. Additionally, members are
encouraged to monitor the members section of the SCC website (www.supply-chain.org) to ensure that
they are using the latest version of SCOR.
This introduction is provided to assist new users of the SCOR-model to begin analytic and
implementation projects. It is intended to remind experienced users of the framework and structure
of the Model when tackling more complex applications of the Model for their businesses. Finally, it is
provided to orient members to the changes between Version 8.0 and Version 9.0.
Version 9.0 of the SCOR-model is the eleventh revision since the Models introduction in 1996.
Revisions of the Model are made when it is determined by Council members that changes should be
made to facilitate the use of the Model in practice. Specific changes in Version 9.0 are outlined later in this
Introduction.
1.1.1
Introduction
SCOR Scope
The SCOR-model has been developed to describe the business activities associated with all
phases of satisfying a customers demand. The Model itself contains several sections and is organized
around the five primary management processes of Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, and Return (shown in
Figure 1). By describing supply chains using these process building blocks, the Model can be used to
describe supply chains that are very simple or very complex using a common set of definitions. As a result,
disparate industries can be linked to describe the depth and breadth of virtually any supply chain. The
Model has been able to successfully describe and provide a basis for supply chain improvement for global
projects as well as site-specific projects.
Plan
Plan
Deliver
Source
Return
Return
Suppliers
Supplier
Make
Deliver
Return
Supplier
Source
Make
Return
Deliver
Return
Your Company
Internal or External
Plan
Source
Return
Make
Deliver
Source
Return
Return
Customer
Internal or External
Customers
Customer
It spans: all customer interactions (order entry through paid invoice), all physical material
transactions (suppliers supplier to customers customer, including equipment, supplies, spare parts, bulk
product, software, etc.) and all market interactions (from the understanding of aggregate demand to the
fulfillment of each order). It does not attempt to describe every business process or activity. Specifically,
the Model does not address: sales and marketing (demand generation), product development, research
and development, and some elements of post-delivery customer support.
It should be noted that the scope of the Model has changed and is anticipated to change based
on Council member requirements. With the introduction of Return, the Model was extended into the area
of post-delivery customer support (although it does not include all activities in that area).
As shown in Figure 2, the Model is designed and maintained to support supply chains of various
complexities and across multiple industries. The Council has focused on three process levels and does
not attempt to prescribe how a particular organization should conduct its business or tailor its systems /
information flow. Every organization that implements supply chain improvements using the SCOR-model
will need to extend the Model, at least to Level 4, using organization-specific processes, systems, and
practice.
1.2.1
Introduction
The Model is silent in the areas of human resources, training, and quality assurance. Currently,
it is the position of the Council that these horizontal activities are implicit in the Model and there are
other highly qualified organizations that are chiefly concerned with how an organization should train,
retain, organize, and conduct their quality programs. Just as the Council recognized the requirements for
marketing and sales in commercial organizations, the Council is not minimizing the importance of these
activities, but they are currently out of scope for SCOR.
Level
Plan
Top Level
(Process Types)
Source
Make Deliver
Return
Return
Configuration Level
(Process Categories)
A companys supply-chain
can be configured-to-order
at Level 2 from core process
categories. Companies
implement their operations
strategy through the
configuration they choose for
their supply-chain.
P1.1
P1.2
P1.3
Balance Production
Resources with SupplyChain Requirements
P1.4
Establish and
Communicate
Supply-Chain Plans
Not in Scope
Comments
Description
Schematic
Implementation Level
(Decompose Process
Elements)
1.2.2
Introduction
The SCOR-model is a business process reference model as illustrated in Figure 3. That is, it is a
Model that links process elements, metrics, best practice and the features associated with the execution
of a supply chain in a unique format. The uniqueness and power of the Model and its successful
implementation is chiefly derived from using these four elements together.
It is important to note that this Model describes processes not functions. In other words, the
Model focuses on the activity involved not the person or organizational element that performs the
activity.
Business Process
Reengineering
Benchmarking
Best Practices
Analysis
Process Reference
Model
Capture the as-is
state of a process
and derive the
desired to-be
future state
Quantify the
operational
performance of
similar companies
and establish
internal targets
based on best-inclass results
Quantify the
operational
performance of
similar companies
and establish
internal targets
based on best-inclass results
Characterize the
management
practices and
software solutions
that result in
best-in-class
performance
Characterize the
management
practices and
software solutions
that result in
best-in-class
performance
1.2.3
Introduction
SCOR-model Structure
Besides the five basic management processes (Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, and Return) that
provide the organizational structure of the SCOR-model, it is useful to distinguish between the three
process types in the Model: planning, execution, and enable (formerly infrastructure). A planning element
is a process that aligns expected resources to meet expected demand requirements. Planning processes
balance aggregated demand across a consistent planning horizon. Planning processes generally occur at
regular intervals and can contribute to supply chain response time. Execution processes are triggered by
planned or actual demand that changes the state of products. They include scheduling and sequencing,
transforming materials and services, and moving product. Enable processes prepare, maintain, and
manage information or relationships upon which planning and execution processes rely.
A set of standard notation is used throughout the Model. P depicts Plan elements, S depicts
Source elements, M depicts Make elements, D depicts Deliver elements, and R depicts Return elements.
SR = Source Return and DR = Deliver Return. An E preceding any of the others (e.g., EP) indicates that the
process element is an Enable element associated with the Planning or Execution element (in this case, EP
would be an Enable Planning element).
As indicated in Figure 2, the Model is hierarchical with three levels. P1.1 is a notation that
indicates a third level process element. In this case, it is a Plan (P Level 1) element that is concerned
with supply chain planning (1 Level 2) and is specific to identifying, prioritizing, and aggregating supply
chain requirements (.1 Level 3).
The SCOR-model version 9.0 has reorganized the traditional sections into five Chapters:
Introduction, Metrics, Processes (Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, Return), Best Practices, and Special
Applications. For modeling purposes, Return is documented in two locations Source and Deliver.
Those Return processes that connect an organization with its supplier (i.e., the return of raw material) are
documented as Source Return activities. Those processes that connect an organization with its customer
(i.e. the receipt of returned finished goods) are documented as Deliver Return activities. This preserves
the concept that Source connects an organization with its suppliers and Deliver connects an organization
with its customers. The Plan and Execution (Source, Make, Deliver, and Return) sections are the heart of
the Model. The definitions that were listed separately in a Glossary in prior versions are now incorporated
into the sections on Metrics, Processes, and Best Practices. The Special Applications section is used for
approved SCOR additions that have not yet been tested thoroughly for integration into the Model, but
that the SCC believes would be beneficial for SCOR users.
The Metrics Chapter has a new addition of a coding system particularly beneficial for
benchmarking as it is based on the Performance Attributes of the metrics. The Attribute of Flexibility
has been renamed to be Agility to avoid confusion with its subsets Flexibility and Adaptability. The
codes include Reliability RL, Responsiveness RS, Agility AG, Cost CO, and Asset Management AM.
The code also consists of the Level of the metric Level 1 Strategic metrics are numbered within each
Attribute, i.e., Perfect Order Fulfillment is RL.1.1. Level 2s are also numbered within each attribute, so for
example, Perfect Condition is RL.2.4. All Level 3 diagnostic metrics are coded by number just based on
their alphabetical listing within each attribute since there are so many of them, and added ones are just
added onto the end of the list rather than recoding existing metrics. So for example, Direct Material Cost
is CO.3.141.
The Process Chapter includes the Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, and Return sections that are
organized with the standard structure that has been brought back from versions prior to SCOR 8.0.
Workflow Graphics have returned into the main body of the Model as a result of the combination of software
1.2.4
Introduction
redesign and input by IDS Scheer and the professional design of a book publisher. This combination
makes SCOR 9.0 the most usable and readable SCOR model to date. At the beginning of each section,
graphics provide a visual representation of the process elements, their relationships to each other, and
the inputs and outputs that are germane to each process element. Following the graphics are text tables
that identify: 1) the standard name for the process element, 2) the notation for the process element, 3)
SCCs standard definition for the process element, 4) performance attributes that are associated with the
process element, 5) metrics that are associated with the performance attributes, 6) best practices that are
associated with the process (candidates, not necessarily an exhaustive list), and best practice descriptions
that can contribute to heightened performance of the process.
Within the Source, Make and Deliver process elements, a common internal structure has been
agreed upon. The Model focuses on three environments, Make-to-Stock, Make-to-Order, and Engineerto-Order. As a result, S1 becomes Source Make-to-Stock Product, S2 becomes Source Make-to-Order
Product and S3 becomes Source Engineer-to-Order Product. This same convention is used for Make, i.e.
M1 Make-to-Stock, and Deliver, i.e. D2 Deliver Make-to-Order Product. This convention was extended
to Return in Version 5.0. R1 is the Return of Defective Product, R2 is the Return of Maintenance, Repair
or Overhaul (MRO) Product, and R3 is the Return of Excess Product and these are each divided into the
Source Return SR and Deliver Return DR, so we have SR1 and DR1 both representing R1, and so on.
Within each of the planning and execution sections and following the graphic and text
descriptions, the associated Enable elements are described using the same graphic and text formats.
Performance Attributes
Level 1 Strategic Metrics
Customer-Facing
Reliability
Responsiveness
Internal-Facing
Agility
Costs
Assets
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
1.2.5
Introduction
The metrics are used in conjunction with performance attributes. In Version 4.0 of the Model,
the Performance Attributes were expanded from four (Supply Chain Reliability, Supply Chain Flexibility
and Responsiveness, Supply Chain Costs, and Supply Chain Asset Management) to five (Supply Chain
Reliability, Supply Chain Responsiveness, Supply Chain Flexibility, Supply Chain Costs, and Supply Chain
Asset Management). In SCOR 9.0, Supply Chain Flexibility has been updated to Supply Chain Agility
to avoid confusion with its subsets Flexibility and Adaptability. The table in Figure 5 defines the
performance attributes and indicates which Level 1 metrics are associated with each attribute.
The Performance Attributes are characteristics of the supply chain that permit it to be analyzed
and evaluated against other supply chains with competing strategies. Just as you would describe a physical
object like a piece of lumber using standard characteristics (e.g., height, width, depth), a supply chain
requires standard characteristics to be described. Without these characteristics it is extremely difficult to
compare an organization that chooses to be the low-cost provider against an organization that chooses
to compete on reliability and performance.
Supply Chain
Reliability
Supply Chain
Responsiveness
Supply Chain
Agility
Supply Chain
Costs
Supply
Chain Asset
Management
Figure 5 Definitions for SCOR Performance Attributes and listing of associated Level 1 metrics.
1.2.6
Introduction
Associated with the Performance Attributes are the Level 1 Strategic Metrics. These Level 1
Metrics are the calculations by which an implementing organization can measure how successful it is
in achieving its desired positioning within the competitive market space. While these Performance
Attributes are critical in implementing the Model, formal definitions were not included in the Model until
Version 4.0, and were not able to be included in Version 8.0 due to software used to develop the SCOR
data. In Version 9.0, these have been reincorporated into not only the Model, but also the new metrics
coding identification system.
Many metrics in the Model are hierarchical just as the process elements are hierarchical. Level
1 Metrics are created from lower level calculations. (Level 1 Metrics are strategic, high level measures that
may cross multiple SCOR processes. Level 1 Metrics do not necessarily relate to a SCOR Level 1 process
(PLAN, SOURCE, MAKE, DELIVER, and RETURN). Metrics hierarchy trees are included for metrics that fit this
structure.
Lower level calculations (Level 2 metrics) are generally associated with a narrower subset of
processes. For example, Delivery Performance is calculated as the total number of products delivered
on time and in full based on a commit date. Additionally, even lower level metrics (diagnostics) are used
to diagnose variations in performance against plan. For example, an organization may wish to examine
the correlation between the request date and commit date. Diagnostic metrics are not necessarily
hierarchical.
1.2.7
Introduction
SCOR Version 9.0 Changes
Processes
SCOR 9.0 adds a whole layer of new ENABLE processes for Risk Management. These processes
can be found in the Ex.9 processes. These are completely new processes with new metrics, best practices,
and inputs and outputs as well. The SCOR 8.0 EP.9 (Align Supply Chain Unit Plan with Financial Plan) and
ES.9 (Manage Supplier Agreements) processes have been renumbered to EP.10 and ES.10 respectively.
New process elements have been added in SCOR 9.0 to manage WASTE DISPOSAL processes as
part of the GreenSCOR integration. Make-to-Stock, Make-to-Order and Engineer-to-Order now each have
a Waste Disposal process element: M1.7, M2.7 and M3.8.
Level 2 process descriptions have been updated to improve the differentiation of Make-to-Stock,
Make-to-Order and Engineer-to-Order process categories.
Process
Change summary
EP.9
EP.9
ES.9
ES.9
M1.7
M2.7
M3.7
EM.9
ED.9
ER.9
Metrics
The Performance Attribute of Flexibility has been renamed to be Agility to eliminate
confusion with the metrics containing the word Flexibility. The definition of the performance attribute
has not changed. SCOR 9.0 introduces new metrics to support risk management and environmental
(GreenSCOR) programs.
1.3.1
Introduction
In SCOR 9.0 metrics coding is introduced. This will simplify identification, eliminate confusion for
similar-sounding metrics and is particularly beneficial for benchmarking as it is based on the Performance
Attributes of the metrics. The format of the metric ID or number is:
XX.y.z
XX = Performance Attribute. The possible values for XX are:
t RL = Reliability,
t RS = Responsiveness,
t AG = Agility,
t CO = Cost, and
t AM = Asset Management.
y = Level of the metric
z = a unique number
Figure 7, Metrics Coding System
Examples: The metric ID for Perfect Order Fulfillment is RL.1.1. From this you can derive that Perfect Order
Fulfillment is a strategic (Level 1) Reliability metric. An example of a level 2 (diagnostic metric) is RL.2.4:
Perfect Condition. Level 3 diagnostic metrics are coded the same way; the unique number has been
assigned based on the alphabetical listing. Future metric additions will simply receive an incremental
number. An example of a level 3 diagnostic metric is CO.3.141 (Direct Material Cost).
SCOR 9.0 consolidates all metrics in a dedicated section of the reference. Section 2 (Metrics)
organizes all metrics by performance attribute. Within each chapter the metrics are sorted on metric ID,
thus putting the metrics in the following sequence: First level 1 metrics, then level 2 metrics and finally
level 3 metrics.
Best Practices
The Best Practices Glossary and Appendix have been consolidated in the Best Practices Section
(Section 4) to contain the definitions and processes where every best practice can be implemented. Best
practices have been added for GreenSCOR (Chapter 4.2) and Risk Management GreenSCOR (Chapter
4.3).
Reference reorganization
Additional to consolidating both the metrics and the best practices other changes have been made to
the order of information in the reference. Inputs and Outputs are now the last chapter of the process
section. The Workflow Graphics have returned to the process chapters and accompany the processes
they describe once again. The graphics have been reformatted to improve readability.
1.3.2
Introduction
SCOR 8.0
Comment
Section/Chapter
Description
Introduction
Unchanged
Section 1
Introduction
Plan
Section 3, Chapter 1
Plan
Source
Section 3, Chapter 2
Source
Make
Section 3, Chapter 3
Make
Deliver
Section 3, Chapter 4
Deliver
Return
Section 3, Chapter 5
Return
Workflow Graphics
Glossary
No longer applicable
Section 3
Process Terms
Section 3
Processes
Metrics
Section 2
Metrics
Best Practices
Section
Best Practices
Section 3, Chapter 6
Appendices
No longer applicable
A: Metrics
Section 2
Metrics
B: Best Practices
Section 4
Best practices
New
Section 5
Special Applications
The new Special Applications section allows special interest groups and project groups to present
applications of SCOR that may be under development, not yet generally be accepted, or may require
additional case studies or proof points. The metrics proposed in Chapter 5.1 are an example of metrics
requiring further discussion among practitioners.
1.3.3
Introduction
The Technical Change Process
The SCOR-model is developed and maintained by the voluntary efforts of the Supply Chain
Council (SCC)members. Unlike other organizations with large technical staffs, the Council depends on the
contributions of its members to actively advance the state of knowledge in supply chain by identifying
required Model changes, researching and validating those changes, and developing the consensus
regarding the proposed changes. SCOR-model versions prior to Version 6.0 were developed in a Committee
structure that was focused on developing a stable, usable Model that could be used by experienced
Council members as well as organizations newly introduced to the SCOR concept. In 2002, confident
that the Models stability had been demonstrated with over 5 years of application experience by Council
members, the Supply Chain Council shifted its technical development focus to specific implementation
issues.
The current technical development process relies on project teams composed of volunteers
from Supply Chain Council member organizations. These project teams are short-lived groups that focus
on specific Model challenges. It is expected that the normal term of a project team will be between 3-6
months. The change process and the coordination of the project team activities is led by the Technical
Development Steering Committee (TDSC), a standing body elected by their peers in the Council. Changes
to the Model are normally initiated by a Council member or members (but may be initiated by a Special
Industry Group, an implementation project team, or the Chief Technical Officer). The primary mechanism
for changing the Model is the Project Team. These teams propose areas of investigation, pursue and
develop proposals for Model development and publish research results on the Council website. These
activities are coordinated by the Supply Chain Councils Technical Development Steering Committee,
which is comprised of elected representatives from the Councils membership.
The Model change process is documented on the SCCs website. Essentially, the process consists
of: 1) The Council issues a call for volunteers to work on an identified need for revision or change, 2)
volunteers submit a Charter Proposal to the TDSC outlining the concept, scope of work, schedules and
milestones, and identifying the volunteer resources, 3) the TDSC reviews the proposed Charter and
provides feedback on the proposed changes to the initiating group, 4) upon approval, the Project Team
crafts the details of their scope of work and determines whether it is likely their efforts will lead to a Model
change (which generally includes the modification of SCOR processes, metrics, best practices, and inputs
and outputs) or a research report (white paper), 5) the Project Team proposes how to integrate proposed
changes into the overall Model, 6) after final technical review the TDSC forwards the technical community
recommendations for proposed changes/additions to the SCC Board of Directors, and 7) following the
approval of the Board, the new Model is published for the SCC membership.
1.4.1
1.4.2
Section 2
Metrics
RL.1.1
Perfect Order Fulfillment
The percentage of orders meeting delivery performance with complete and accurate
documentation and no delivery damage. Components include all items and quantities ontime using the customers definition of on-time, and documentation packing slips, bills of
lading, invoices, etc.
Qualitative Relationship Description
t
t
t
t
An order is considered perfect if the products ordered are the products provided and the
quantities ordered match the quantities provided (% In Full).
A delivery is considered perfect if the location, specified customer entity and delivery time
ordered is met upon receipt (Delivery Performance to Customer Commit Date).
Documentation supporting the order line is considered perfect if it is all accurate, complete, and
on time (Accurate Documentation).
The product condition is considered perfect if the product is delivered / faultlessly installed (as
applicable) on specification, with the correct configuration, with no damage, customer ready,
and is accepted by the customer (Perfect Condition)
2.1.1
RL.1.1
Discussion
The performance of the supply chain is considered perfect if the original commitment made to a
customer is met through the supply chain.
An order is defined as a collection of one or more order lines representing a request to deliver
specified quantities of goods or to render specific services. The order can further be defined as
a request (with a specific identifier as a reference) to deliver specified items or to render specific
services with specific prices, dates, and quantities. Commitments are made to a customer at the
order line level, where an order line is defined as a line representing a commitment on a sales order.
An order line always references a product or service.
For an order to be considered perfect the following standards must be met:
t Delivered complete; all items on the order line are delivered in the quantities specified
t Delivered on time to the initial commitment date, using the customers definition of on-time
delivery
t Documentation supporting the order including packing slips, bills of lading, invoices, quality
certifications, etc., is complete and accurate
t Faultlessly installed (as applicable), correct configuration, customer-ready and accepted, no
damage, on specification
Orders canceled by the customer are excluded from the metric. Order changes initiated by the
customer and agreed to by the supplier supersede initial commitments and form a new comparative
basis for the metric.
Often for date and quantity issues (and occasionally product), a range rather than a strict value is
used. This is acknowledged as a standard practice; in those situations the standard measured is
considered to be met perfectly if the range specified is satisfied.
The term customer-ready for the perfect condition standard may imply a subjective component
based on the customers satisfaction. Although condition may not be as rigorously measured as
time or quantity it should be considered as a component if available, especially since this attribute
measures performance of the supply chain which is, of course, ultimately measured by its customers.
It should also be noted that a corresponding evaluation of suppliers performances could be
determined by extending these standards to each suppliers ability to source products.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
2.1.2
RL.2.1
% of Orders Delivered In Full
Percentage of orders which all of the items are received by customer in the quantities
committed
Qualitative Relationship Description
An order is considered delivered in full if:
t All items ordered are the items actually provided, and no extra items are provided
t All quantities received by the customer match the order quantities (within mutually agreed
tolerances)
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
[Total number of orders delivered in full] / [Total number of orders delivered] x 100%
Data Collection
Data for the components that are used to drive the calculation of % In Full are primarily associated
with the original order processing step of Reserve inventory and Determine Delivery Date (D1.3, D2.3
& D3.3), inventory availability (M1.1, M2.1, M3.1) including inventory location accuracy, (ED.4), and
the satisfaction of that commitment through the shipment and customer receiving processes (D 1.12,
D1.13, D2.12, D.2.13, D3.12, D3.13)
Discussion
Order quantities are based on item / quantity original commitments agreed to by the customer.
Orders canceled by the customer are excluded from the metric. Order changes initiated by
the customer and agreed to by the supplier supersede original commitments and form a new
comparative basis for the metric. This metric has no timing element, such that orders deliberately
split by the supplier should still be considered in full so long as all metric criteria are met. In some
cases, such as for supplying bulk materials, committed quantities refer to a range that is acceptable to
the customer rather than a strict value.
Several SCOR diagnostic metrics exist that can be used to focus % In Full improvement efforts. Some
of these include:
t % Orders Scheduled to Requested Quantity
t Schedule Achievement
t Yield variability
t Planned Shipment Fill Rate (not yet defined)
t % Stock Outs (not yet defined)
t Inventory Cycle Count Accuracy (not yet defined)
Orders may not be filled completely to the customers original request quantity due to the inability to
schedule to the initial request. Breakdown may also occur from the inventory availability (including
stock outs for MTS and schedule achievement for MTO and ETO) and inventory location accuracy.
Lastly, a deviation from the shipment plan may lead to inability to fulfill an order completely.
2.1.3
RL.2.1
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
2.1.4
RL.2.2
Delivery Performance to Customer Commit Date
The percentage of orders that are fulfilled on the customers originally scheduled or
committed date
Qualitative Relationship Description
An order is considered delivered to the original Customer commitment date if:
t The order is received on time as defined by the customer
t The delivery is made to the correct location and Customer entity
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
[Total number of orders delivered on the original commitment date] / [Total number of orders
delivered] x 100%
Data Collection
Data for the components that are used to drive the calculation of Delivery Performance to Customer
Commit Date are primarily associated with the original order processing step of Reserve inventory
and Determine Delivery date (D1.3, D2.3 & D3.3), and the satisfaction of that commitment through
the shipment and customer receiving processes (D 1.12, D1.13, D2.12, D2.13, D3.12, D3.13).
Discussion
Order delivery performance from a timing perspective is based on original commitments agreed to
by the customer. The acceptable window for delivering on time should be defined in the customer
service level agreement. Orders canceled by the customer are excluded from the metric. Order
changes impacting the timing of a delivery that are initiated by the customer and agreed to by the
supplier supersede original commitments and form a new comparative basis for the metric. The
original commitment date can refer to a range, rather than a strict date and time, that is acceptable
to the customer (e.g. advanced shipments). This metric has no In Full element, such that partial
deliveries can still be considered as meeting the Customer Commit Date so long as all metric criteria
are met. Measuring the frequency of accepting the customers original request date, vs. commit date,
can be an important measure of customer satisfaction.
Several SCOR diagnostic metrics exist that can be used to focus delivery performance improvement
efforts. Some of these include:
t % Orders Scheduled to Request
t % Orders Shipped on time (not yet defined)
t Carrier Performance Reliability (not yet defined)
Orders may not be delivered to the Customer Commit Date due to breakdowns in the order
fulfillment and shipment process (e.g. Transportation availability). Orders may also be delivered late
due to carrier delivery performance / issues.
2.1.5
RL.2.2
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
2.1.6
RL.2.3
Documentation Accuracy
Percentage of orders with accurate documentation supporting the order, including packing
slips, bills of lading, invoices, etc.
Qualitative Relationship Description
An order is considered to have accurate documentation when the following are accepted by the
customer:
t Shipping documentation
t Payment documentation
t Compliance documentation
t Other required documentation
All documentation must be complete, correct, and readily available when and how expected by the
customer, Government and other supply chain regulatory entities.
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
[Total number of orders delivered with accurate documentation] / [Total number of orders delivered]
x 100%
Document supporting the order includes:
t Shipping documentation:
o Packing slips (Customers)
o Bill of lading (Carriers)
o Government or Customs documentation / forms
t Payment Documentation:
o Invoice
o Contractual outline agreement
t Compliance documentation
o Material Safety Data Sheets
t Other required documentation
o Quality certification
Data Collection
Data for the components that are used to drive the calculation of Accurate Documentation are
primarily associated with the Deliver processing step of Load Product & Generate Shipping
Documentation (D1.11, D2.11, D3.11), and Invoice (D1.15, D2.15, D3.15).
The data collection step is part of Assess Delivery Performance (ED2) and Manage Deliver Information
(ED3)
2.1.7
RL.2.3
Discussion
This metric is calculated at the order level. The timeliness and quality of the documentation is
measured from the perspective of the customer, Government, and other regulatory entities.
Documentation may be late or incomplete due to the inability to prepare / process the correct
documentation on time. Inaccurate or late shipping documentation may prevent the product to be
loaded or shipped, increase the customs delay, and delay the customers acceptance of the order.
Inaccurate or late invoices may also lead to the inability to fulfill the customer request.
The definition encompasses On time and Accurate documentation. However, on-time documentation
implies a scheduled ship date and scheduled invoice date.
Accurate documentation metrics are similar to what exists for SOURCE process metrics
Possible diagnostic metrics that can be used to focus Accurate Documentation improvement efforts
include:
t % orders documentation (shipping and invoice) processed on time
t % faultless invoices
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
2.1.8
RL.2.4
Perfect Condition
Percentage of orders delivered in an undamaged state that meet specification, have the
correct configuration, are faultlessly installed (as applicable), and accepted by the customer
Qualitative Relationship Description
An order is considered to be delivered in perfect condition if all items meet the following criteria:
t Undamaged
t Meet specification and has correct configuration (as applicable)
t Faultlessly installed (as applicable) and accepted by the customer
t Not returned for repair or replacement (within the warranty period)
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
[ Number of orders delivered in Perfect Condition ] / [Number of orders delivered ] x 100%
Data Collection
Data for the components that are used to drive the calculation of Perfect Condition are primarily
associated with the receipt, installation (as applicable) and satisfaction of the order commitment
(D1.13, D1.14, D2.13, D2.14, D3.13, D3.14). The Enable Deliver Process Element - Assess Delivery
Performance (ED.2) should be updated to reflect this metric and its components.
This data is typically available from a complaints, claims, or warranty/returns database.
Discussion
This metric, calculated at the order level, assesses the quality of products delivered through the
supply chain from the customers perspective. Justified and non-justified product quality issues,
claims and returns within the warranty period are included and count against this metric. Improving
this metric lowers the supply chain cost associated with claims and returns.
Several SCOR diagnostic metrics exist that can be used to focus Perfect Condition improvement
efforts. Some of these include:
t Cost of Noncompliance
t Damage and Shrinkage
t Scrap Expense
t Warranty Costs
t Yield Variability
2.1.9
RL.2.4
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
2.1.10
RL
Level 3 Reliability Metrics
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RL.3.1
# of complaints
regarding missing
environmental
documentation
RL.3.2
# of
recordkeeping
related NOVs
RL.3.3
# of staff-related
environmental
violations
RL.3.4
% correct material
documentation
RL.3.5
% Error-free
Returns Shipped
% Error-free
Returns Shipped
RL.3.6
% Identified MRO
Products
Returned
To Service
% Identified MRO
Products Returned
To Service
RL.3.7
% Item Location
Accuracy
% Item Location
Accuracy
RL.3.8
% of assets in
compliance
with scheduled
maintenance
requirements
RL.3.9
% of employees
trained on
environmental
requirements
RL.3.10
% of Excess
Product Returns
Delivered
Complete to
the Designated
Return Center
2.1.11
RL
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RL.3.11
% of Faultless
Invoices
D1.15: Invoice
D2.15: Invoice
D3.15: Invoice
RL.3.12
% Of Faultless
Installations
RL.3.13
% of MRO returns
delivered to the
correct service
provider location
RL.3.14
% of products
meeting specified
environmental
performance
requirements
RL.3.15
% of products
with proper
environmental
labeling (if
required)
RL.3.16
% of suppliers
meeting
environmental
metrics/criteria
RL.3.17
% of suppliers
with an EMS
or ISO 14001
certification
RL.3.18
% Orders/ Lines
Processed
Complete
2.1.12
RL
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RL.3.19
% Orders/ Lines
Received Defect
Free
RL.3.20
% Orders/ Lines
Received OnTime To Demand
Requirement
RL.3.21
% Orders/ lines
received with
correct content
RL.3.22
% Orders/ lines
received with
correct packaging
RL.3.23
% Orders/ Lines
Received with
Correct Shipping
Documents
RL.3.24
% Orders/ lines
received damage
free
RL.3.25
% Product
Transferred OnTime to Demand
Requirement
RL.3.26
% Product
Transferred
without
Transaction Errors
RL.3.27
% Schedules
Changed within
Suppliers Lead
Time
2.1.13
RL
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RL.3.28
% Shipping
Schedules
that Support
Customer
Required Return
by Date
RL.3.29
Age of Product
/ Customer Risk
Data (months)
RL.3.30
Age of Supplier
Risk Data
(months)
RL.3.31
Compliance
Documentation
Accuracy
Percentage of compliance
documentations are complete, correct,
and readily available when and how
expected by customer, Government
and other supply chain regulatory
entities. Compliance documentations
includes material safety data sheets
RL.3.32
Customer
Commit Date
Achievement
Time Customer
Receiving
2.1.14
RL
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RL.3.33
Delivery Item
Accuracy
RL.3.34
Delivery Location
Accuracy
2.1.15
RL
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RL.3.35
Delivery Quantity
Accuracy
RL.3.36
Fill Rate
RL.3.37
Forecast Accuracy
2.1.16
RL
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RL.3.38
Number of
notices of
violation received
RL.3.40
Number of
occurrences
where excessive
inventory is
returned and
followed
RL.3.41
Orders Delivered
Damage Free
Conformance
RL.3.42
Orders Delivered
Defect Free
Conformance
RL.3.43
Other Required
Documentation
Accuracy
RL.3.44
Package
Cycle Time
M1.4: Package
RL.3.45
Payment
Documentation
Accuracy
Percentage of payment
documentations are complete, correct,
and readily available when and how
expected by customer, Government
and other supply chain regulatory
entities. Payment documentations
includes invoice, contractual outline
agreement
RL.3.46
Reportable
Release Incidents
RL.3.47
Return Shipments
Shipped on
Time
2.1.17
RL
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RL.3.48
Risk Mitigation
Plan
RL.3.49
Schedule
Achievement
RL.3.50
Shipping
Documentation
Accuracy
Percentage of shipping
documentations are complete, correct,
and readily available when and how
expected by customer, Government
and other supply chain regulatory
entities. Shipping documentations
includes packing slips (customers), bill
of lading (carriers) and government or
customs documentation / forms
RL.3.51
Supplier
Mitigation Plans
Implemented
(percent)
RL.3.52
Supplier return
order cycle time
reestablished and
sustained in 30
days
RL.3.53
Total # of
Confirmed
MRO Conditions/
Total
# of MRO Service
Requests
Initiated
2.1.18
RL
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RL.3.54
VAR of product/
customer
performance -
RL.3.55
Warranty and
Returns
RL.3.56
Warranty Costs
RL.3.57
Waste Processing
Errors
RL.3.58
Yield
RL.3.59
Yield Variability
2.1.19
2.1.20
RS.1.1
Order Fulfillment Cycle Time
The average actual cycle time consistently achieved to fulfill customer orders. For each individual order, this cycle time starts from the order receipt and ends with customer acceptance
of the order.
Qualitative Relationship Description
None Identified
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
Order Fulfillment Cycle Time Source Cycle Time + Make Cycle Time + Deliver Cycle Time
Calculation
[Sum Actual Cycle Times For All Orders Delivered] / [Total Number Of Orders Delivered]
Data Collection
Data for the components that are used to drive the calculation of responsiveness are taken from the
Source, Make and Deliver process elements.
Discussion
The order fulfillment cycle time as captured from the moment a customer places the order to the
moment the order is fulfilled is considered to be a gross cycle time. It represents all the time passed
between these two events, regardless of whether this represented cycle time for the activities
performed by the organization to fulfill the order (both value-add and non-value-add) or dwell time
because the order was placed well in advance by the customer. As such, this gross order fulfillment
cycle time does not truly reflect the responsiveness of the organization. Take for example an
organization that needs six days to fulfill a certain customer order. If the customer places the order
one day in advance, the gross order fulfillment cycle time will be seven days. If the customer places
the order 3 months ahead (pre-ordering), the gross fulfillment cycle time will be 96 days. However,
the fact that the customer pre-orders does not reduce the responsiveness of the organization. On the
contrary, one can argue that it may increase the ability of the organization to meet that order as it
allows the organization to plan ahead and fulfill the order in a more optimal way.
The responsiveness of the organization is determined by the cumulative cycle time for all activities
that are required to fulfill the order, but should exclude any dwell time where no activity takes place.
Therefore the definition of Order Fulfillment Cycle Time consists of a gross component and a net
component named Order Fulfillment Process Time, according to the following formula: Order
Fulfillment Cycle Time = Order Fulfillment Process Time + Order Fulfillment Dwell Time. Note that
dwell time will equal 0 for companies who do not utilize this metric, so Order Fulfillment Cycle Time
will equal Order Fulfillment Process Time.
Order fulfillment dwell time is defined as any lead time during the order fulfillment process where no
activity takes place, which is imposed by customer requirements. Note that this dwell time is different
from idle time or non-value-add lead time, which is caused by inefficiencies in the organizations
processes and therefore ultimately under responsibility of the organization. This kind of idle time
should not be deducted from the gross order fulfillment cycle time.
2.2.1
RS.1.1
Discussion cont.
Dwell time is mostly associated with the ordering process, where a customer may place an order in
advance to reserve capacity/materials etc, but where the actual steps in the order fulfillment process
take place later on. It is also common in the delivery process where the organization may be in
principle ready to ship the product/service, but is requested by the customer to wait (for example to
follow a certain shipment schedule).
Note that for those organizations where dwell time does not play a role, the dwell time can be
taken as zero days which results in the net order fulfillment cycle time to be equal to the gross order
fulfillment cycle time.
For benchmarking purposes it is recommended to use the Order Fulfillment Process Time, as this is
the cycle time reflecting most accurately the responsiveness of the organization. It will also ensure
that those organizations in industries where dwell time is a factor can be benchmarked against
organizations in industries where dwell time does not play a role.
The concept of dwell time applies not only to the level 1 metric, but alsoto all lower level metrics. This
means that each lower level metric can have a gross component, consisting of the net component
and dwell time. Because the lower level metrics are heirarchical (the cumulative sum of cycle times at
level 2 or 3 should be equal to the cycle time at level 1.) The cumulative sum of dwell times at level 2
or 3 should total up to the dwell time at level 1.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
2.2.2
RS.2.1
Source Cycle Time
The average time associated with Source Processes. (Processes: S1, S2, S3)
Qualitative Relationship Description
None Identified
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
Source Cycle Time (Identify Sources of Supply Cycle Time + Select Supplier and Negotiate Cycle
Time) + Schedule Product Deliveries Cycle Time + Receive Product Cycle Time + Verify Product Cycle
Time + Transfer Product Cycle Time + Authorize Supplier Payment Cycle Time
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
Metrics in Level 3 that are used to drive the calculation of Source Cycle time are taken from the
Source process elements, depending on the possible strategies deployed by companies to fulfill
orders such as make-to-stock, make-to-order or engineer-to-order. When make-to-stock or make-toorder strategy is deployed, the dashed optional metrics Identify Sources of Supply Cycle Time and
Select Supplier and Negotiate Cycle Time are not used in the calculation.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
The dashed line boxes represent optional metrics associated with specific level 3 processes.
2.2.3
RS.2.2
Make Cycle Time
The average time associated with Make Processes. (Processes: M1, M2, M3)
Qualitative Relationship Description
None Identified
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
Make Cycle Time (Finalize Production Engineering Cycle Time) + Schedule Production Activities
Cycle Time + Issue Material/Product Cycle Time + Produce and Test Cycle Time + Package Cycle Time
+ Stage Finished Product Cycle Time + Release Finished Product To Deliver Cycle Time
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
Metrics in Level 3 that are used to drive the calculation of Make Cycle time are taken from the Make
process elements, depending on the possible strategies deployed by companies to fulfill orders
such as make-to-stock, make-to-order or engineer-to-order. When make-to-stock or make-to-order
strategy is deployed, the dashed optional metric Finalize Production Engineering Cycle Time is not
used in the calculation. And also, the data for the calculation of Level 3 metrics may also depends on
different make strategies, e.g., when make-to-stock strategy is deployed, the metric Issue Material/
Product Cycle Time means the time for issuing material; while when make-to-order or engineer-toorder is deployed, it will be a measure for calculating the cycle time for issuing sourced or in-process
product.
In Make Cycle Time, there may be overlaps in the processes, so the least amount of time should be
applied rather than the total sum.
2.2.4
RS.2.2
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
The dashed line boxes represent optional metrics associated with specific level 3 processes.
2.2.5
RS.2.3
Delivery Cycle Time
The average time associated with Deliver Processes. (Processes: D1, D2, D3)
Qualitative Relationship Description
None Identified
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
Delivery Cycle Time MAX {[Receive, Configure, Enter and Validate Order Cycle Time + Reserve
Resources & Determine Delivery Date Cycle Time + (Consolidate Orders Cycle Time + Schedule
Installation Cycle Time) + Build Loads Cycle Time + Route Shipments Cycle Time + Select Carriers and
Rate Shipments Cycle Time], Receive Product from Make/Source Cycle Time} + Pick Product Cycle
Time + Pack Product Cycle Time + Load Vehicle & Generate Shipping Documentation Cycle Time +
Ship Product Cycle Time + (Receive & Verify Product Cycle Time) + (Install Product Cycle Time)
*The MAX function above is to indicate that Dx.3-Dx.7 may be in parallel with Dx.8and whichever
takes longer should determine the cycle time.
Calculation
None Idetified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
Metrics in Level 3 that are used to drive the calculation of Deliver Cycle time are taken from the
Deliver process elements, depending on the possible strategies deployed by companies to fulfill
orders such as make-to-stock, make-to-order or engineer-to-order. When make-to-stock or maketo-order strategy is deployed, the optional metric Schedule Installation Cycle Time is not used in the
calculation, otherwise the metric Consolidate Orders Cycle Time will not be used.
And also, the data for the calculation of Level 3 metrics may also depends on different make
strategies, e.g., when make-to-stock strategy is deployed, the metric Receive, Configure, Enter and
Validate Order Cycle Time may not include the Configure process.
2.2.6
RS.2.3
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
The dashed line boxes represent optional metrics associated with specific level 3 processes.
2.2.7
RS.2.4
Delivery Retail Cycle Time
The average cycle time of the processes used to acquire, merchandise, and sell finished
goods at a retail store. (Process: D4)
Qualitative Relationship Description
None Identified
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
Delivery Retail Cycle Time Generate Stocking Schedule Cycle Time + Receive Product Cycle Time +
Pick Product Cycle Time + Stock Shelf Cycle Time + Fill Shopping Cart Cycle Time + Checkout Cycle
Time + Install Cycle Time
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
None Identified
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
2.2.8
RS
Level 3 Responsiveness Metrics
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RS.3.1
Align Supply
Chain Unit Plan
with Financial
Plan Cycle Time
RS.3.2
Assess Delivery
Performance
Cycle Time
RS.3.3
Assess Supplier
Performance
Cycle Time
RS.3.4
Asset Turns
M1.4: Package
M2.4: Package
M3.5: Package
M1.3: Produce and Test
M2.3: Produce and Test,
M3.4: Produce and Test
RS.3.5
Authorize
Defective Product
Return Cycle Time
RS.3.6
Authorize Excess
Product Return
Cycle Time
RS.3.7
Authorize MRO
Product Return
Cycle Time
RS.3.8
Authorize
Supplier Payment
Cycle Time
RS.3.9
Average Days
per Engineering
Change
RS.3.10
RS.3.11
Average Release
Cycle of Changes
RS.3.12
Balance Product
Resources
with Product
Requirements
Cycle Time
2.2.9
RS
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RS.3.13
Balance
Production
Resources with
Production
Requirements
Cycle Time
RS.3.14
Balance Return
Resources
with Return
Requirements
Cycle Time
RS.3.15
Balance Supply
Chain Resources
with Supply Chain
Requirements
Cycle Time
RS.3.16
RS.3.17
Checkout Cycle
Time
D4.6: Checkout
RS.3.18
Consolidate
Orders Cycle Time
RS.3.19
Current customer
return order cycle
time
RS.3.20
Current logistics
order cycle time
RS.3.21
Current
manufacturing
order cycle time
M1: Make-to-Stock,
M2: Make-to-Order,
M3: Engineer-to-Order
RS.3.22
Current supplier
return order cycle
time
RS.3.23
Customs
Clearance Cycle
Time
RS.3.24
Deliver and/or
Install Cycle Time
2.2.10
RS
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RS.3.25
Enter Order,
Commit
Resources &
Launch Program
Cycle Time
RS.3.26
Establish and
Communicate
Return Plans
Cycle Time
RS.3.27
Establish Delivery
Plans Cycle Time
RS.3.28
Establish
Production Plans
Cycle Time
RS.3.29
Establish
Sourcing Plans
Cycle Time
RS.3.30
Establish
Supply Chain
Plans
Cycle Time
RS.3.31
External Event
Response
(average days)
RS.3.32
RS.3.33
Finalize
Production
Engineering Cycle
Time
RS.3.34
Generate
Stocking
Schedule Cycle
Time
2.2.11
RS
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RS.3.35
Identify Sources
of Supply Cycle
Time
RS.3.36
Identify, Assess
and Aggregate
Production
Resources
Cycle Time
RS.3.37
Identify, Assess,
and Aggregate
Delivery
Resources Cycle
Time
RS.3.38
Identify, Assess,
and Aggregate
Product
Resources Cycle
Time
RS.3.39
Identify, Assess,
and Aggregate
Supply Chain
Resources Cycle
Time
RS.3.40
Identify, Prioritize,
and Aggregate
Delivery
Requirements
Cycle Time
RS.3.41
Identify, Prioritize,
and Aggregate
Product
Requirements
Cycle Time
RS.3.42
Identify, Prioritize,
and Aggregate
Production
Requirements
Cycle Time
RS.3.43
Identify,
Prioritize, and
Aggregate Return
Requirements
Cycle Time
2.2.12
RS
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RS.3.44
Identify, Prioritize,
and Aggregate
Supply Chain
Requirements
Cycle Time
RS.3.46
Install Product
Cycle Time
RS.3.47
In-stock %
RS.3.48
Invoice Cycle
Time
D1.15: Invoice
D3.15: Invoice
RS.3.49
Issue Material
Cycle Time
RS.3.50
RS.3.51
Load Product
& Generate
Shipping
Documentation
Cycle Time
RS.3.52
RS.3.53
Maintain Source
Data Cycle Time
RS.3.54
Manage Business
Rules for PLAN
Processes Cycle
Time
RS.3.55
Manage Business
Rules for Return
Processes Cycle
Time
RS.3.56
Manage Capital
Assets Cycle Time
RS.3.57
Manage Deliver
Business Rules
Cycle Time
2.2.13
RS
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RS.3.58
Manage Deliver
Capital Assets
Cycle Time
RS.3.59
Manage Deliver
Information Cycle
Time
RS.3.60
Manage Finished
Goods Inventories
Cycle Time
RS.3.61
Manage
Import/Export
Requirements
Cycle Time
RS.3.62
Manage Incoming
Product Cycle
Time
RS.3.63
RS.3.64
Manage
Integrated Supply
Chain Capital
Assets Cycle Time
RS.3.65
Manage
Integrated Supply
Chain Inventory
Cycle Time
RS.3.66
Manage
Integrated
Supply Chain
Transportation
Cycle Time
RS.3.67
Manage MAKE
Equipment and
Facilities Cycle
Time
RS.3.68
Manage MAKE
Information Cycle
Time
RS.3.69
Manage MAKE
Regulatory
Compliance Cycle
Time
2.2.14
RS
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RS.3.70
Manage
Performance of
Return Processes
Cycle Time
RS.3.71
Manage
Performance of
Supply Chain
Cycle Time
RS.3.72
Manage PLAN
Data Collection
Cycle Time
RS.3.73
Manage Plan
Regulatory
Requirements
and Compliance
Cycle Time
RS.3.74
Manage Planning
Configuration
Cycle Time
RS.3.75
Manage Product
Inventory Cycle
Time
RS.3.76
Manage Product
Life Cycle Time
RS.3.77
Manage
Production
Network Cycle
Time
RS.3.78
Manage
Production
Performance
Cycle Time
RS.3.79
Manage
Production Rules
Cycle Time
RS.3.80
Manage Return
Capital Assets
Cycle Time
RS.3.81
Manage Return
Data Collection
Cycle Time
RS.3.82
Manage Return
Inventory Cycle
Time
2.2.15
RS
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RS.3.83
Manage Return
Network
Configuration
Cycle Time
RS.3.84
Manage Return
Regulatory
Requirements
and Compliance
Cycle Time
RS.3.85
Manage Return
Transportation
Cycle Time
RS.3.86
Manage Sourcing
Business Rules
Cycle Time
RS.3.87
Manage Supplier
Agreements Cycle
Time
RS.3.88
Manage Supplier
Network Cycle
Time
RS.3.89
Manage
Transportation
(WIP) Cycle Time
RS.3.90
Manage
Transportation
Cycle Time
RS.3.91
Manufacturing
cycle time
reestablished and
sustained for 30
days
RS.3.92
Negotiate &
Receive Contract
Cycle Time
RS.3.93
2.2.16
RS
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RS.3.94
Order Fulfillment
Dwell Time
RS.3.95
Pack Product
Cycle Time
RS.3.96
Pick Product
Cycle Time
RS.3.97
RS.3.98
RS.3.99
RS.3.100
RS.3.101
RS.3.102
RS.3.103
RS.3.104
Receive Defective
Product Cycle
Time
2.2.17
RS
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RS.3.105
Receive Excess
Product Cycle
Time
RS.3.106
Receive MRO
Product Cycle
Time
RS.3.107
Receive Product
Cycle Time
RS.3.108
Receive Product
from Make/
Source
Cycle Time
RS.3.109
Receive Product
at Store Cycle
Time
RS.3.110
Receive Product
from Source or
Make Cycle Time
RS.3.111
Receive,
Configure, Enter
& Validate Order
Cycle Time
RS.3.112
RS.3.113
Receiving Product
Cycle Time
RS.3.114
Release Finished
Product to Deliver
Cycle Time
RS.3.115
Reserve Inventory
& Determine
Delivery Date
Cycle Time
2.2.18
RS
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RS.3.116
Reserve
Resources and
Determine
Delivery Date
Cycle Time
RS.3.117
Route Shipments
Cycle Time
RS.3.118
Schedule
Defective Return
Receipt Cycle
Time
RS.3.119
Schedule Excess
Return Receipt
Cycle Time
RS.3.120
Schedule
Installation Cycle
Time
RS.3.121
Schedule MRO
Return Receipt
Cycle Time
RS.3.122
Schedule Product
Deliveries Cycle
Time
RS.3.123
Schedule
Production
Activities Cycle
Time
RS.3.124
RS.3.125
Select Supplier
and Negotiate
Cycle Time
RS.3.126
Ship Product
Cycle Time
RS.3.127
Source Return
Cycle Time
2.2.19
RS
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RS.3.128
Stage Finished
Product Cycle
Time
RS.3.129
RS.3.130
Supply chain
down time due to
compliance issues
RS.3.131
RS.3.132
RS.3.133
RS.3.134
RS.3.135
RS.3.136
Transfer Defective
Product Cycle
Time
2.2.20
RS
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
RS.3.137
Transfer Excess
Product Cycle
Time
RS.3.138
Transfer MRO
Product Cycle
Time
RS.3.139
Transfer Product
Cycle Time
RS.3.140
Verify Product
Cycle Time
RS.3.141
Waste
accumulation
time
2.2.21
2.2.22
AG.1.1
Upside Supply Chain Flexibility
The number of days required to achieve an unplanned sustainable 20% increase in quantities
delivered.
Note - 20% is a number provided for benchmarking purposes. For some industries and some
organizations 20% may be in some cases unobtainable or in others too conservative.
Note - component metrics (Upside Source Flexibility, Upside Make Flexibility, etc) can be
improved in parallel and as a result, this calculation requires the result to be the least amount
of time to achieve the desired result).
Qualitative Relationship Description
Calculation: Total elapsed days between the occurrence of the unplanned event and the achievement
of sustained plan, source, make, deliver and return performance.
Note: Elapsed days are not necessarily the sum of days required for all activities as some may occur
simultaneously.
AG.2.1 Upside Source Flexibility: The number of days required to achieve an unplanned sustainable
20% increase in quantity of raw materials.
AG.2.2 Upside Make Flexibility: The number of days required to achieve an unplanned sustainable
20% increase in production with the assumption of no raw material constraints.
AG.2.3 Upside Deliver Flexibility: The number of days required to achieve an unplanned sustainable
20% increase in quantity delivered with the assumption of no other constraints.
AG.2.4 Upside Source Return Flexibility: The number of days required to achieve an unplanned
sustainable 20% increase in the return of raw materials to suppliers.
AG.2.5 Upside Deliver Return Flexibility: The number of days required to achieve an unplanned
sustainable 20% increase in the return of finished goods from customers.
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
The calculation of supply chain flexibility requires the calculation to be the least time required
to achieve the unplanned sustainable increase when considering Source, Make, and Deliver
components.
For example, if it requires 90 days achieve a 20% increase in raw material volume, 60 days for adding
capital to support production, and no time to increase the ability to deliver, upside supply chain
flexibility would be 90 days (if production changes can run concurrently with material acquisition
activities) or as much as 150 days if production changes and material acquisition changes must run
sequentially.
2.3.1
AG.1.1
Data Collection
Data for the components that are used to drive the calculation of supply chain flexibility are taken
from the actual planning activities incurred in devising the actions to be taken and the execution
activities themselves. Neither the complete set of activities nor any given subset of those activities
can be identified except in either contingency plans (in which case they are hypothetical), special
analytical simulations conducted for the purpose of predicting total elapsed time, or after the fact
(when they have actually occurred and are unlikely to reoccur in the same combination).
Flexibility measures are assumption based or based on historic events. Some elements can be
measured and taken as a basis for further considerations, e.g.
Discussion
Certainly enterprises deal with change all the time. In most cases, these changes are minor deviations
from the norm or fleeting blips in the marketplace. Also, certainly, most supply chains move
through these changes almost effortlessly and, in this regard, demonstrate equivalent flexibility. In
many extreme cases, however, it is possible that a particular supply chain has reached a condition
of relative rigidity (say, at capacity or rigid, constraining agreements with partners) and a seemingly
minor increase in production requirement can consume much time and effort as the supply chain
struggles to restore its capability to perform.
It is evidenced that enterprises engaged in appropriate business risk and competitive contingency
planning activities will usually be in a better position to optimize overall supply chain performance
and these activities are presented as best practices later in this document.
When change is known in advance (such as Wal-Mart requiring RFID devices on all delivered cases,
or a major sourcing change is planned to occur), and is incorporated in the enterprises operating
plan, then the time incurred to undertake the adaptation isnt necessarily a reflection of the supply
chains flexibility. While flexibility is still addressed, it is frequently clouded by other considerations in
the operating plan. Unplanned change is the primary consideration in measuring the supply chains
flexibility.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
2.3.2
AG.1.2
Upside Supply Chain Adaptability
The maximum sustainable percentage increase in quantity delivered that can be achieved in
30 days.
Note: 30 days is an arbitrary number provided for benchmarking purposes. For some
industries and some organizations 30 days may be in some cases unobtainable or in others
too conservative.
Note: Component metrics (Upside Source Adaptability, Upside Make Adaptability, etc) can
be improved in parallel and as a result, this calculation requires the result to be the least
increase in quantity sustainable in 30 days
Qualitative Relationship Description
Note: The calculation of Supply Chain Adaptability requires the calculation to be the least quantity
sustainable when considering Source, Make, Deliver and Return components.
AG.2.6 Upside Source Adaptability: The maximum sustainable percentage increase in raw material
quantities that can be acquired/received in 30 days.
AG.2.7 Upside Make Adaptability: The maximum sustainable percentage increase in production that
can be achieved in 30 days with the assumption of no raw material constraints.
AG.2.8 Upside Deliver Adaptability: The maximum sustainable percentage increase in quantities
delivered that can be achieved in 30 days with the assumption of unconstrained finished good
availability.
AG.2.9 Upside Source Return Adaptability: The maximum sustainable percentage increase in returns
of raw materials to suppliers that can be achieved in 30 days with the assumption of unconstrained
finished goods availability.
AG.2.10 Upside Deliver Return Adaptability: The maximum sustainable percentage increase in returns
of finished goods from customers that can be achieved in 30 days.
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
Upside Source Adaptability + Upside Make Adaptability + Upside Deliver Adaptability
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
Adaptability measures are assumption based or based on historic events. Some elements can be
measured and taken as a basis for further considerations. Adaptability measures are based on the
actual number of returns compared to the maximum number of returns which can be achieved
within 30 days. The weakest component determines the overall volume.
2.3.3
AG.1.2
Discussion
The calculation of Supply Chain Adaptability requires the calculation to be the least quantity
sustainable when considering Source, Make, Deliver and Return components.
o P&L Impact
! Revenue
! COGS
! SGA
o Balance Sheet Impact
! Inventory
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
2.3.4
AG.1.3
Downside Supply Chain Adaptability
The reduction in quantities ordered sustainable at 30 days prior to delivery with no inventory
or cost penalties.
Note: 30 days is an arbitrary number provided for benchmarking purposes. For some industries and some organizations 30 days may be in some cases unobtainable or in others too
conservative.
Qualitative Relationship Description
The calculation of downside supply chain adaptability requires the calculation to be based on the
least reduction sustainable when considering Source, Make, and Deliver components.
AG.2.11 Downside Source Adaptability: The raw material quantity reduction sustainable at 30 days
prior to delivery with no inventory or cost penalties.
AG.2.12 Downside Make Adaptability: The production reduction sustainable at 30 days prior to
delivery with no inventory or cost penalties.
AG.2.13 Downside Deliver Adaptability: The reduction in delivered quantities sustainable at 30 days
prior to delivery with no inventory or cost penalties.
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
Downside Source Adaptability + Downside Make Adaptability + Downside Deliver Adaptability
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
Adaptability measures are assumption based on historic events. Some elements can be measured
and taken as a basis for further considerations.
Discussion
The calculation of Supply Chain Adaptability requires the calculation to be the least quantity
sustainable when considering Source, Make, Deliver and Return components.
o P&L Impact
! Revenue
! COGS
! SGA
o Balance Sheet Impact
! Inventory
2.3.5
AG.1.3
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
2.3.6
AG.2.1
Upside Source Flexibility
The number of days required to achieve an unplanned sustainable 20% increase in quantity
of raw materials.
Note: This is a planning activity normally considering constraints to increase delivery that
results in an estimate. Possible constraint factors are included in this section.
Qualitative Relationship Description
Least time to pursue all necessary activities.
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
Source: Input
Current elements needed to fully understand future requirements, to establish 20% gap, based on
the question How long will it take for the company to sustain a 20% increase in quantities sourced?.
These elements are mainly output metrics from other attributes . . . responsiveness, reliability, cost,
asset management.
Demand
o Current source volumes
! Amount of each item purchased
Staffing
o Staff needed to meet current demand
! Productivity-purchase orders per FTE
! Needed, but may be underutilized
Capital
o Current capital requirements
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
Materials
o All else equal in make, deliver, return, current inventory on hand (raw material and purchased
finished goods), including safety stock required to sustain current order fulfillment.
! Assuming optimized inventory practices (no excess inventory)
o Current sourcing/supplier constraints
! Current contract terms.
! Nature of items; commodity/sole source.
2.3.7
AG.2.1
Discussion cont.
Cycle Time
o Current procurement cycle time
! Time to place a purchase order
Supplier lead time
Source: Resource Availability Assessment & Ramp-up/Lead Time
Elements needed to establish 20% delta in resources and what is required to meet the 20% delta
based on the question How long will it take for the company to sustain a 20% increase in quantities
sourced?
Demand
o Additional source volume
Staffing
o Staff availability in procurement (underutilized FTEs)
o Amount of time needed to recruit/hire/train additional staff to fill gap between underutilized
FTEs and staff needed to sustain 20% increase in quantities delivered
Capital
o Current capital availability
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
o Amount of time needed to obtain capital to fill gap between current capital availability and
capital needed to sustain 20% increase in quantities ordered
Materials
o Sourcing Constraints
! Time required in negotiating new source/volume contracts/terms
! Time required to find/obtain additional sources
o All else equal in make, deliver, return, amount of time needed to obtain, deliver and phase in
inventory (raw material and purchased finished goods) for order fulfillment, including safety
stock to sustain 20% increase in quantities sourced.
Cycle Time
o Amount of time needed to reach and sustain current procurement cycle time
! Time to place a purchase order
! Supplier lead time
2.3.8
AG.2.1
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
The dashed line boxes represent optional metrics associated with specific level 3 processes.
2.3.9
AG.2.2
Upside Make Flexibility
The number of days required to achieve an unplanned sustainable 20% increase in production with the assumption of no raw material constraints.
Note: This is a planning activity normally considering constraints to increase delivery that
results in an estimate.
Qualitative Relationship Description
Least time to pursue all necessary activities.
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
Make: Input
Current elements needed to fully understand future requirements, to establish 20% gap, based
on the question How long will it take for the company to sustain a 20% increase in quantities
produced?. These elements are mainly output metrics from other attributes . . . responsiveness,
reliability, cost, asset management.
Demand
o Current make volumes
! Amount of each item manufactured
Labor
o Labor needed to meet current demand
! Productivity-units/orders per FTE
! Needed, but may be underutilized
Capital/Assets
o Internal and External (outsourced) capacity needed for current demand throughput
! Facilities, space
! Manufacturing equipment, materials handling and packaging equipment, etc.
! Needed, but may be underutilized
o Current capital requirements
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, make vs. buy, lease vs. purchase)
Materials
o All else equal in source, deliver and return, current inventory on hand (WIP and finished
goods), including safety stock required to sustain current order fulfillment.
2.3.10
AG.2.2
Discussion cont.
! Assuming optimized inventory practices (no excess inventory)
Cycle Time
o Current manufacturing cycle time (all else equal including procurement order cycle time and
supplier lead time)
Make: Resource Availability Assessment & Ramp-up/Lead Time
Elements needed to establish 20% delta in resources and what is required to meet the 20% delta
based on the question How long will it take for the company to sustain a 20% increase in quantities
produced?
Demand
o Additional make volume
Labor
o Direct labor availability and percent of labor used in manufacturing, not used in direct
activity (underutilized FTEs)
o Amount of time needed to recruit/hire/train additional labor to fill gap between
underutilized FTEs and labor needed to sustain 20% increase in quantities manufactured
Capital/Assets
o Current Internal Capacity utilization
! Facilities, space
! Manufacturing equipment, materials handling and packaging equipment, etc.
o Current capital availability
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, lease vs. purchase)
o Amount of time needed to obtain capital to fill gap between underutilized asset capacity
and assets needed to sustain 20% increase in quantities delivered
o Amount of time needed to obtain assets/capacity to fill gap between underutilized asset
capacity and assets needed to sustain 20% increase in quantities delivered
! Facilities, space
! Manufacturing equipment, materials handling and packaging equipment, etc.
Outsourcing Alternatives to capital
o Supplemental Outsource/lease availability
! Facilities, lease building, etc.
! Lease manufacturing equipment, materials handling and packaging equipment,
etc.
! Co-packers
o Amount of time needed to obtain supplemental outsourced or leased resources or facilities
to sustain 20% increase in quantities made
Materials
o All else equal in source, deliver and return, amount of time needed to receive and phase in
raw material inventory for manufacturing and make WIP and FG inventory, including safety
stock to sustain 20% increase in quantities manufactured)
Cycle Time
o Amount of time needed to reach and sustain current manufacturing cycle time (all else equal
including procurement order cycle time and supplier lead time)
2.3.11
AG.2.2
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
The dashed line boxes represent optional metrics associated with specific level 3 processes.
2.3.12
AG.2.3
Upside Deliver Flexibility
The number of days required to achieve an unplanned sustainable 20% increase in quantity
delivered with the assumption of no other constraints.
Note: This is a planning activity normally considering constraints to increase delivery that
results in an estimate.
Qualitative Relationship Description
Least time to pursue all necessary activities.
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
Deliver: Input
Current elements needed to fully understand future requirements, to establish 20% gap, based on the
question How long will it take for the company to sustain a 20% increase in quantities delivered?.
These elements are mainly output metrics from other attributes . . . responsiveness, reliability, cost,
asset management.
Demand
o Current delivery volume
! Number of orders shipped
Labor
o Labor needed to meet current demand
! Productivity-orders per FTE
! Needed, but may be underutilized
Capital/Assets
o Internal and External (3PL) capacity needed for current demand throughput
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, outside carrier loads, materials handling equipment, etc.
! Needed, but may be underutilized
Current capital requirements
o Credit line
o Cash on hand
o Accounting procedures
o Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, make vs. buy, lease vs. purchase)
Materials
o All else equal in source, make, return, current finished goods inventory on hand (including
safety stock required to sustain current order fulfillment)
2.3.13
AG.2.3
Discussion cont.
! Assuming optimized inventory practices (no excess inventory)
Cycle Time
o Current logistics order cycle time (all else equal including procurement order cycle time,
supplier lead time, manufacturing cycle time, etc.)
! Customer order processing cycle time (logistics only)
! Dock-to-stock cycle time
! Pick-to-ship cycle time
! Transit time
Deliver: Resource Availability Assessment & Ramp-up/Lead Time
Elements needed to establish 20% delta in resources and what is required to meet the 20% delta
based on the question How long will it take for the company to sustain a 20% increase in quantities
delivered?
Demand
o Additional delivery volume
Labor
o Direct labor availability and percent of labor used in logistics, not used in direct activity
(underutilized FTEs)
o Amount of time needed to recruit/hire/train additional labor to fill gap between underutilized
FTEs and labor needed to sustain 20% increase in quantities delivered
Capital/Assets
o Current Internal Capacity utilization
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, materials handling equipment, etc.
o Current capital availability
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, lease vs. purchase)
o Amount of time needed to obtain capital to fill gap between underutilized asset capacity and
assets needed to sustain 20% increase in quantities delivered
o Amount of time needed to obtain assets/capacity to fill gap between underutilized asset
capacity and assets needed to sustain 20% increase in quantities delivered
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, materials handling equipment, etc.
Outsourcing Alternatives to capital
o Supplemental Outsource/lease availability
! 3PL facilities, lease building, etc.
! Full service lease fleet, materials handling, etc. equipment
! Outside carriers
o Amount of time needed to obtain supplemental outsourced or leased resources or facilities to
sustain 20% increase in quantities delivered
Materials
o All else equal in source, make, return, amount of time needed to increase finished inventory
for order fulfillment (time to receive/stock inventory, including safety stock to sustain 20%
increase in quantities delivered)
2.3.14
AG.2.3
Discussion cont.
Cycle Time
o Amount of time needed to reach and sustain current logistics order cycle time (all esle equal
including procurement order cycle time, supplier lead time, manufacturing cycle time, etc.)
! Customer order processing cycle time (logistics only)
! Dock-to-stock cycle time
! Pick-to-ship cycle time
! Transit time
2.3.15
AG.2.3
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
The dashed line boxes represent optional metrics associated with specific level 3 processes.
2.3.16
AG.2.4
Upside Source Return Flexibility
The number of days required to achieve an unplanned sustainable 20% increase in the return
of raw materials to suppliers.
Note: This is a planning activity normally considering constraints to increase delivery that results in an
estimate.
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
Source Return: Input
Assuming no supplier constraints, current elements needed to fully understand future requirements,
to establish 20% gap, based on the question How long will it take for the company to sustain a 20%
increase in quantities returned to suppliers? These elements are mainly output metrics from other
attributes . . . responsiveness, reliability, cost, asset management.
Demand
! Current return volume
! Number of orders returned
Staff / Labor
o Procurement Staff / Logistics Labor needed to meet current returned volume
! Productivity-orders returned per FTE
! Needed, but may be underutilized
Capital/Assets
o Internal and External (3PL) capacity needed for current return throughput
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, outside carrier loads, materials handling equipment, etc.
! Needed, but may be underutilized
o Current capital requirements
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, lease vs. purchase)
Cycle Time
o Current supplier return order cycle time
! Supplier return order processing cycle time (procurement and logistics)
! Pick-to-ship cycle time
! Transit time
2.3.17
AG.2.4
Discussion cont.
Source Return: Resource Availability Assessment & Ramp-up/Lead Time
Assuming no supplier constraints, elements needed to establish 20% delta in resources and what
is required to meet the 20% delta based on the question How long will it take for the company to
sustain a 20% increase in quantities returned to suppliers?
Demand
o Additional supplier return volume
Staff / Labor
o Procurement staff / Logistics labor availability (underutilized FTEs)
o Amount of time needed to recruit/hire/train additional staff / labor to fill gap between
underutilized FTEs and staff / labor needed to sustain 20% increase in quantities returned to
suppliers
Capital/Assets
o Current Internal Capacity utilization
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, materials handling equipment, etc.
o Current capital availability
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, lease vs. purchase)
o Amount of time needed to obtain capital to fill gap between underutilized asset capacity
and assets needed to sustain 20% increase in quantities returned to suppliers
o Amount of time needed to obtain assets/capacity to fill gap between underutilized asset
capacity and assets needed to sustain 20% increase in quantities returned to suppliers
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, materials handling equipment, etc.
Outsourcing Alternatives to capital
o Supplemental Outsource/lease availability
! 3PL facilities, lease building, etc.
! Full service lease fleet, materials handling, etc. equipment
! Outside carriers
o Amount of time needed to obtain supplemental outsourced or leased resources or facilities
to sustain 20% increase in quantities returned to suppliers
Cycle Time
o Amount of time needed to reach and sustain current supplier return order cycle time
! Supplier return order processing cycle time (procurement and logistics)
! Pick-to-ship cycle time
! Transit time
2.3.18
AG.2.4
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Constraint Factors
The dashed line boxes represent optional metrics associated with specific level 3 processes.
2.3.19
AG.2.5
Upside Deliver Return Flexibility
The number of days required to achieve an unplanned sustainable 20% increase in the return
of finished goods from customers.
Note: This is a planning activity normally considering constraints to increase delivery that
results in an estimate.
Qualitative Relationship Description
Least time to pursue all necessary activities.
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
Deliver Return: Input
Assuming no customer constraints, current elements needed to fully understand future requirements,
to establish 20% gap, based on the question How long will it take for the company to sustain a 20%
increase in quantities returned from customers? These elements are mainly output metrics from
other attributes . . . responsiveness, reliability, cost, asset management.
Demand
o Current return volume
! Number of orders returned
Staff / Labor
o Customer Service Staff / Logistics Labor needed to meet current returned volume
! Productivity-orders returned per FTE
! Needed, but may be underutilized
Capital/Assets
o Internal and External (3PL) capacity needed for current return throughput
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, outside carrier loads, materials handling equipment, etc.
! Needed, but may be underutilized
o Current capital requirements
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, lease vs. purchase)
Cycle Time
o Current customer return order cycle time
! Customer return order processing cycle time (customer service and logistics)
! Transit time
! Return processing and disposition cycle time
2.3.20
AG.2.5
Discussion cont.
Deliver Return: Resource Availability Assessment & Ramp-up/Lead Time
Assuming no customer constraints, elements needed to establish 20% delta in resources and what
is required to meet the 20% delta based on the question How long will it take for the company to
sustain a 20% increase in quantities returned to suppliers?
Demand
o Additional customer return volume
Staff / Labor
o Customer Service staff / Logistics labor availability (underutilized FTEs)
o Amount of time needed to recruit/hire/train additional staff / labor to fill gap between
underutilized FTEs and staff / labor needed to sustain 20% increase in quantities returned
from customers
Capital/Assets
o Current Internal Capacity utilization
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, materials handling equipment, etc.
o Current capital availability
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, lease vs. purchase)
o Amount of time needed to obtain capital to fill gap between underutilized asset capacity
and assets needed to sustain 20% increase in quantities returned from customers
o Amount of time needed to obtain assets/capacity to fill gap between underutilized asset
capacity and assets needed to sustain 20% increase in quantities returned from customers
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, materials handling equipment, etc.
Outsourcing Alternatives to capital
o Supplemental Outsource/lease availability
! 3PL facilities, lease building, etc.
! Full service lease fleet, materials handling, etc. equipment
! Outside carriers
o Amount of time needed to obtain supplemental outsourced or leased resources or facilities
to sustain 20% increase in quantities returned from customers
Cycle Time
o Amount of time needed to reach and sustain current customer return order cycle time
! Customer return order processing cycle time (customer service and logistics)
! Transit time
! Return processing and disposition cycle time
2.3.21
AG.2.5
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
The dashed line boxes represent optional metrics associated with specific level 3 processes.
2.3.22
AG.2.6
Upside Source Adaptability
The maximum sustainable percentage increase in raw material quantities that can be
acquired/received in 30 days.
Qualitative Relationship Description
Least quantity sustainable when considering all components
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
Source: Input
Current elements needed to fully understand future requirements, to establish the volume delta that
can be sustained based on the question How much of an increase in quantities sourced (expressed
as a percentage) can the company sustain, given 30 days? These elements are mainly output metrics
from other attributes . . . responsiveness, reliability, cost, asset management.
Demand
o Current source volumes
! Amount of each item purchased
Staffing
o Staff needed to meet current demand
! Productivity-purchase orders per FTE
! Needed, but may be underutilized
Capital
o Current capital requirements
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
Materials
o All else equal in make, deliver, return, current inventory on hand (raw material and purchased
finished goods), including safety stock required to sustain current order fulfillment.
! Assuming optimized inventory practices (no excess inventory)
o Current sourcing/supplier constraints
! Current contract terms.
! Nature of items; commodity/sole source.
Cycle Time
o Current procurement cycle time
! Time to place a purchase order
! Supplier lead time
2.3.23
AG.2.6
Discussion cont.
Source: Resource Availability Assessment & Ramp-up/Lead Time
Elements needed to establish delta in resources and what can be ramped up and sustained within
30 days based on the question How much of an increase in quantities sourced (expressed as a
percentage) can the company sustain, given 30 days
Demand
o Additional source volume to be determined given ramped up resources below
Staffing
o Staff availability in procurement (underutilized FTEs)
o How much staff can be recruited/hired and trained fill gap between underutilized FTEs and
FTEs needed to increase and sustain quantities sourced given 30 days
Capital
o Current capital availability
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
o How much capital can be obtained to increase quantities sourced given 30 days
Materials
o Sourcing Constraints
! Time required in negotiating new source/volume contracts/terms
! Time required to find/obtain additional sources
o All else equal in make, deliver, return, how much inventory (raw material and purchased
finished goods) can be obtained, delivered and phased in and sustained for order fulfillment,
including safety stock given 30 days.
Cycle Time
o Procurement order cycle time reestablished and sustained for increased quantities sourced
given 30 days.
! Time to place a purchase order
! Supplier lead time
2.3.24
AG.2.6
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Capital availability
Additional demand sourcing - supplier constraints
Amount of additional capital obtained in 30 days
Amount of inventory (Raw, Purchased FG) obtained in 30
days
Purchase order cycle time reestablished and sustained in
30 days
The dashed line boxes represent optional metrics associated with specific level 3 processes.
2.3.25
AG.2.7
Upside Make Adaptability
The maximum sustainable percentage increase in production that can be achieved in 30 days
with the assumption of no raw material constraints.
Qualitative Relationship Description
Least quantity sustainable when considering all components
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
Make: Input
Current elements needed to fully understand future requirements, to establish the volume delta that
can be sustained based on the question How much of an increase in quantities produced (expressed
as a percentage) can the company sustain, given 30 days? These elements are mainly output metrics
from other attributes . . . responsiveness, reliability, cost, asset management.
Demand
o Current make volumes
! Amount of each item manufactured
Labor
o Labor needed to meet current demand
! Productivity-units/orders per FTE
! Needed, but may be underutilized
Capital/Assets
o Internal and External (outsourced) capacity needed for current demand throughput
! Facilities, space
! Manufacturing equipment, materials handling and packaging equipment, etc.
! Needed, but may be underutilized
o Current capital requirements
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, make vs. buy, lease vs. purchase)
Materials
o All else equal in source, deliver and return, current inventory on hand (WIP and finished
goods), including safety stock required to sustain current order fulfillment.
! Assuming optimized inventory practices (no excess inventory)
Cycle Time
o Current manufacturing cycle time (all else equal including procurement order cycle time and
supplier lead time)
2.3.26
AG.2.7
Discussion cont.
Make: Resource Availability Assessment & Ramp-up/Lead Time
Elements needed to establish delta in resources and what can be ramped up and sustained within
30 days based on the question How much of an increase in quantities produced (expressed as a
percentage) can the company sustain, given 30 days
Demand
o Additional make volume to be determined given increased resources below
Labor
o Direct labor availability and percent of labor used in manufacturing, not used in direct
activity (underutilized FTEs)
o How much labor can be recruited/hired and trained fill gap between underutilized FTEs and
FTEs needed to increase and sustain quantities produced given 30 days
Capital/Assets
o Current Internal Capacity utilization
! Facilities, space
! Manufacturing equipment, materials handling and packaging equipment, etc.
o Current capital availability
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, lease vs. purchase)
o How much capital can be obtained to fill gap between underutilized asset capacity and
assets needed to increase and sustain quantities produced given 30 days
o How much assets/capacity can be obtained to fill gap between underutilized asset capacity
and assets needed to increase and sustain quantities produced given 30 days
! Facilities, space
! Manufacturing equipment, materials handling and packaging equipment, etc.
Outsourcing Alternatives to capital
o Supplemental Outsource/lease availability
! Facilities, lease building, etc.
! Lease manufacturing equipment, materials handling and packaging equipment, etc.
! Co-packers
o How much supplemental outsourced or leased resources or facilities can be obtained to
increase and sustain quantities produced given 30 days
Materials
o All else equal in source, deliver and return, how much raw material inventory can be received
and phased into manufacturing and produced into WIP and FG inventory, and sustained for
order fulfillment, including safety stock given 30days.
Cycle Time
o Manufacturing cycle time reestablished and sustained for increased quantities produced
given 30 days.
2.3.27
AG.2.7
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
2.3.28
AG.2.8
Upside Deliver Adaptability
The maximum sustainable percentage increase in quantities delivered that can be achieved
in 30 days with the assumption of unconstrained finished good availability.
Qualitative Relationship Description
Least quantity sustainable when considering all components
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
Deliver: Input
Current elements needed to fully understand future requirements, to establish the volume delta that
can be sustained based on the question How much of an increase in quantities delivered (expressed
as a percentage) can the company sustain, given 30 days? These elements are mainly output metrics
from other attributes . . . responsiveness, reliability, cost, asset management.
Demand
o Current delivery volume
! Number of orders shipped
Labor
o Labor needed to meet current demand
! Productivity-orders per FTE
! Needed, but may be underutilized
Capital/Assets
o Internal and External (3PL) capacity needed for current demand throughput
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, outside carrier loads, materials handling equipment, etc.
! Needed, but may be underutilized
o Current capital requirements
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, make vs. buy, lease vs. purchase)
Materials
o All else equal in source, make, return, current finished goods inventory on hand (including
safety stock required to sustain current order fulfillment)
! Assuming optimized inventory practices (no excess inventory)
2.3.29
AG.2.8
Discussion cont.
Cycle Time
o Current logistics order cycle time (all else equal including procurement order cycle time,
supplier lead time, manufacturing cycle time, etc.)
! Customer order processing cycle time (logistics only)
! Dock-to-stock cycle time
! Pick-to-ship cycle time
! Transit time
Deliver: Resource Availability Assessment & Ramp-up/Lead Time
Elements needed to establish delta in resources and what can be ramped up and sustained within
30 days based on the question How much of an increase in quantities delivered (expressed as a
percentage) can the company sustain, given 30 days
Demand
o Additional delivery volume to be determined given increased resources below
Labor
o Direct labor availability and percent of labor used in logistics, not used in direct activity
(underutilized FTEs)
o How much labor can be recruited/hired and trained fill gap between underutilized FTEs and
FTEs needed to increase and sustain quantities delivered given 30 days
Capital/Assets
o Current Internal Capacity utilization
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, materials handling equipment, etc.
o Current capital availability
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, lease vs. purchase)
o How much capital can be obtained to fill gap between underutilized asset capacity and
assets needed to increase and sustain quantities delivered given 30 days
o How much assets/capacity can be obtained to fill gap between underutilized asset capacity
and assets needed to increase and sustain quantities delivered given 30 days
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, materials handling equipment, etc.
Outsourcing Alternatives to capital
o Supplemental Outsource/lease availability
! 3PL facilities, lease building, etc.
! Full service lease fleet, materials handling, etc. equipment
! Outside carriers
o How much supplemental outsourced or leased resources or facilities can be obtained to
increase and sustain quantities delivered given 30 days
Materials
o All else equal in source, make, return, amount of how much finished goods inventory can be
received/stocked, including safety stock to sustain quantities delivered given 30 days
2.3.30
AG.2.8
Discussion cont.
Cycle Time
o Logistics cycle time reestablished and sustained for increased quantities delivered
given 30 days (all else equal including procurement order cycle time, supplier lead time,
manufacturing cycle time, etc.)
! Customer order processing cycle time (logistics only)
! Dock-to-stock cycle time
! Pick-to-ship cycle time
! Transit time
2.3.31
AG.2.8
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
The dashed line boxes represent optional metrics associated with specific level 3 processes.
2.3.32
AG.2.9
Upside Source Return Adaptability
The maximum sustainable percentage increase in returns of raw materials to suppliers that
can be achieved in 30 days.
Qualitative Relationship Description
The component which is the bottleneck determines the least volume for the increase of returns
within 30 days. Least quantity sustainable when considering all components
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
Source Return: Input
Assuming no supplier constraints, current elements needed to fully understand future requirements,
to establish the volume delta that can be sustained based on the question How much of an increase
in quantities returned to suppliers (expressed as a percentage) can the company sustain, given 30
days? These elements are mainly output metrics from other attributes . . . responsiveness, reliability,
cost, asset management.
Demand
o Current return volume
! Number of orders returned
Staff / Labor
o Procurement Staff / Logistics Labor needed to meet current returned volume
! Productivity-orders returned per FTE
! Needed, but may be underutilized
Capital/Assets
o Internal and External (3PL) capacity needed for current return throughput
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, outside carrier loads, materials handling equipment, etc.
! Needed, but may be underutilized
o Current capital requirements
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, lease vs. purchase)
Cycle Time
o Current supplier return order cycle time
! Supplier return order processing cycle time (procurement and logistics)
! Pick-to-ship cycle time
! Transit time
2.3.33
AG.2.9
Discussion cont.
Source Return: Resource Availability Assessment & Ramp-up/Lead Time
Assuming no supplier constraints, elements needed to establish delta in resources and what can
be ramped up and sustained within 30 days based on the question How much of an increase in
quantities returned to suppliers (expressed as a percentage) can the company sustain, given 30 days
Demand
o Additional supplier return volume to be determined given increased resources below
Staff / Labor
o Procurement staff / Logistics labor availability (underutilized FTEs)
o How much procurement staff/logistics labor can be recruited/hired and trained fill gap
between underutilized FTEs and FTEs needed to increase and sustain quantities returned to
suppliers given 30 days
Capital/Assets
o Current Internal Capacity utilization
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, materials handling equipment, etc.
o Current capital availability
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, lease vs. purchase)
o How much capital can be obtained to fill gap between underutilized asset capacity and
assets needed to increase and sustain quantities returned to suppliers given 30 days
o How much assets/capacity can be obtained to fill gap between underutilized asset capacity
and assets needed to increase and sustain quantities returned to suppliers given 30 days
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, materials handling equipment, etc.
Outsourcing Alternatives to capital
o Supplemental Outsource/lease availability
! 3PL facilities, lease building, etc.
! Full service lease fleet, materials handling, etc. equipment
! Outside carriers
o How much supplemental outsourced or leased resources or facilities can be obtained to
increase and sustain quantities returned to suppliers given 30 days
Cycle Time
o Source return cycle time reestablished and sustained for increased quantities returned to
suppliers given 30 days
! Supplier return order processing cycle time (procurement and logistics)
! Pick-to-ship cycle time
! Transit time
2.3.34
AG.2.9
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
The dashed line boxes represent optional metrics associated with specific level 3 processes.
Copyright 2008 Supply Chain Council Inc.
2.3.35
AG.2.10
Upside Deliver Return Adaptability
The maximum sustainable percentage increase in returns of finished goods from customers
that can be achieved in 30 days.
Qualitative Relationship Description
The component which is the bottleneck determines the least volume for the increase of returns
within 30 days. Least quantity sustainable when considering all components
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
Deliver Return: Input
Assuming no customer constraints, current elements needed to fully understand future requirements,
to establish the volume delta that can be sustained based on the question How much of an increase
in quantities returned from customers (expressed as a percentage) can the company sustain, given 30
days? These elements are mainly output metrics from other attributes . . . responsiveness, reliability,
cost, asset management.
Demand
o Current return volume
! Number of orders returned
Staff / Labor
o Customer Service Staff / Logistics Labor needed to meet current returned volume
! Productivity-orders returned per FTE
! Needed, but may be underutilized
Capital/Assets
o Internal and External (3PL) capacity needed for current return throughput
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, outside carrier loads, materials handling equipment, etc.
! Needed, but may be underutilized
o Current capital requirements
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, lease vs. purchase)
Cycle Time
o Current customer return order cycle time
! Customer return order processing cycle time (customer service and logistics)
! Transit time
! Return processing and disposition cycle time
2.3.36
AG.2.10
Discussion cont.
Deliver Return: Resource Availability Assessment & Ramp-up/Lead Time
Assuming no customer constraints, elements needed to establish delta in resources and what can
be ramped up and sustained within 30 days based on the question How much of an increase in
quantities returned from customers (expressed as a percentage) can the company sustain, given 30
days
Demand:
o Additional customer return volume to be determined given increased resouces below
Staff / Labor
o Customer Service staff / Logistics labor availability (underutilized FTEs)
o How much customer service staff/logistics labor can be recruited/hired and trained fill gap
between underutilized FTEs and FTEs needed to increase and sustain quantities returned
from customers given 30 days
Capital/Assets
o Current Internal Capacity utilization
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, materials handling equipment, etc.
o Current capital availability
! Credit line
! Cash on hand
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, lease vs. purchase)
o How much capital can be obtained to fill gap between underutilized asset capacity and
assets needed to increase and sustain quantities returned from customers given 30 days
o How much assets/capacity can be obtained to fill gap between underutilized asset capacity
and assets needed to increase and sustain quantities returned from customers given 30 days
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, materials handling equipment, etc.
Outsourcing Alternatives to capital
o Supplemental Outsource/lease availability
! 3PL facilities, lease building, etc.
! Full service lease fleet, materials handling, etc. equipment
! Outside carriers
o How much supplemental outsourced or leased resources or facilities can be obtained to
increase and sustain quantities returned from customers given 30 days
Cycle Time
o Deliver return cycle time reestablished and sustained for increased quantities returned to
suppliers given 30 days
o Customer return order processing cycle time (customer service and logistics)
! Transit time
! Return processing and disposition cycle time
2.3.37
AG.2.10
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
The dashed line boxes represent optional metrics associated with specific level 3 processes.
2.3.38
AG.2.11
Downside Source Adaptability
The raw material quantity reduction sustainable at 30 days prior to delivery with no
inventory or cost penalties.
Qualitative Relationship Description
Least quantity reduction sustainable when considering all components
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
Source: Input
Current elements needed to fully understand future requirements, to establish the volume delta that
can be sustained based on the question How much of a reduction in quantities sourced (expressed
as a percentage) can the company sustain, given 30 days? These elements are mainly output metrics
from other attributes . . . responsiveness, reliability, cost, asset management.
Demand
o Current source volumes
! Amount of each item purchased
Staffing
o Staff needed to meet current demand
! Productivity-purchase orders per FTE
! Needed, but may be underutilized
Capital
o Current capital requirements
! Accounting procedures
Materials
o All else equal in make, deliver, return, current inventory on hand (raw material and
purchased finished goods), including safety stock required to sustain current order
fulfillment.
! Assuming optimized inventory practices (no excess inventory)
o Current sourcing/supplier constraints
! Current contract terms.
! Nature of items; commodity/sole source.
Cycle Time
o Current procurement cycle time
! Time to place a purchase order
! Supplier lead time
2.3.39
AG.2.11
Discussion cont.
Source: Resource Availability Assessment & Ramp-down/Lead Time
Elements needed to establish delta in resources and what can be ramped down and sustained at
30 days prior to delivery based on the question How much of a decrease in quantities sourced
(expressed as a percentage) can the company sustain without inventory or cost penalties, given 30
days notice prior to delivery
Demand
o Reduced source volume to be determined given ramped down resources below
Staffing
o Staff availability in procurement (underutilized FTEs)
o How much staff can be laid-off or diverted to other activities, without cost penalty, to ramp
down to decreased quantities delivered given 30 days notice
Capital
o Current capital requirements
! Accounting procedures for selling/diverting/recycling assets
Materials
o Sourcing Constraints
! Time required in negotiating new source/volume contracts/terms
! Time required to ramp down supplier inventory
o How much inventory (raw material and purchased finished goods) can be returned, sold or
diverted without cost penalty to ramp down to decreased quantities delivered given 30 days
notice
Cycle Time
o Procurement order cycle time reestablished and sustained for decreased quantities sourced
given 30 days.
! Time to place a purchase order
! Supplier lead time
2.3.40
AG.2.11
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Capital availability
Current capital requirements (accounting policy)
Demand sourcing - supplier constraints
Amount of decrease in inventory (Raw, Purchased FG)
obtained in 30 days
Purchase order cycle time reestablished and sustained in
30 days
The dashed line boxes represent optional metrics associated with specific level 3 processes.
2.3.41
AG.2.12
Downside Make Adaptability
The production reduction sustainable at 30 days prior to delivery with no inventory or cost
penalties.
Qualitative Relationship Description
Least quantity reduction sustainable when considering all components
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
Make: Input
Current elements needed to fully understand future requirements, to establish the volume delta that
can be sustained based on the question How much of a reduction in quantities produced (expressed
as a percentage) can the company sustain, given 30 days? These elements are mainly output metrics
from other attributes . . . responsiveness, reliability, cost, asset management.
Demand
o Current make volumes
! Amount of each item manufactured
Labor
o Labor needed to meet current demand
! Productivity-units/orders per FTE
! Needed, but may be underutilized
Capital/Assets
o Internal and External (outsourced) capacity needed for current demand throughput
! Facilities, space
! Manufacturing equipment, materials handling and packaging equipment, etc.
! Needed, but may be underutilized
o Current capital requirements
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, make vs. buy, lease vs. purchase)
Materials
o All else equal in source, deliver and return, current inventory on hand (WIP and finished
goods), including safety stock required to sustain current order fulfillment.
! Assuming optimized inventory practices (no excess inventory)
Cycle Time
o Current manufacturing cycle time (all else equal including procurement order cycle time and
supplier lead time)
2.3.42
AG.2.12
Make: Resource Availability Assessment & Ramp-down/Lead Time
Elements needed to establish delta in resources and what can be ramped down and sustained at
30 days prior to delivery based on the question How much of a decrease in quantities produced
(expressed as a percentage) can the company sustain without inventory or cost penalties, given 30
days notice prior to delivery
Demand
o Reduced make volume to be determined given ramped down resources below
Labor
o Direct labor availability and percent of labor used in manufacturing, not used in direct
activity (underutilized FTEs)
o How much labor can be laid-off or diverted to other activities, without cost penalty, to ramp
down to decreased quantities delivered given 30 days notice
Capital/Assets
o Current Internal Capacity utilization
! Facilities, space
! Manufacturing equipment, materials handling and packaging equipment, etc.
o Current capital requirements
! Accounting procedures for selling/diverting/recycling assets
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, make vs. buy, lease vs. purchase) and
their effect upon ability to terminate leases or sell capital equipment assets.
o How many capital equipment assets can be recycled, diverted or sold or subleased without
cost penalty, to ramp down to decreased quantities delivered given 30 days notice
! Facilities, space
! Manufacturing equipment, materials handling and packaging equipment, etc.
Outsourcing Alternatives to capital
o Supplemental Outsource/lease availability
! Facilities, lease building, etc.
! Lease manufacturing equipment, materials handling and packaging equipment,
etc.
! Co-packers
o How much supplemental outsourced or leased resources or facilities can be terminated to
ramp down to decreased quantities delivered given 30 days notice
Materials
o All else equal in source, deliver and return, how much manufacturing quantities (WIP and
FG inventory), including safety stock can be ramped down to decreased order fulfillment
quantities given 30 days notice.
Cycle Time
o Manufacturing cycle time reestablished and sustained for decreased quantities produced
given 30 days.
2.3.43
AG.2.12
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
The dashed line boxes represent optional metrics associated with specific level 3 processes.
2.3.44
AG.2.13
Downside Deliver Adaptability
Downside Deliver Adaptability = The reduction in delivered quantities sustainable at 30 days
prior to delivery with no inventory or cost penalties.
Qualitative Relationship Description
Least quantity reduction sustainable when considering all components
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
Deliver: Input Elements
Current elements needed to fully understand future requirements, to establish what can be ramped
down and sustained at 30 days prior to delivery, based on the question How much of a decrease in
quantities delivered (expressed as a percentage) can the company sustain without inventory or cost
penalties, given 30 days notice prior to delivery? These elements are mainly output metrics from
other attributes . . . responsiveness, reliability, cost, asset management.
Demand
o Current delivery volume
! Number of orders shipped
Labor
o Labor needed to meet current demand
! Productivity-orders per FTE
! Needed, but may be underutilized
Capital/Assets
o Internal and External (3PL) capacity needed for current demand throughput
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, outside carrier loads, materials handling equipment, etc.
! Needed, but may be underutilized
o Current capital requirements
! Accounting procedures
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, make vs. buy, lease vs. purchase)
Materials
o All else equal in source, make, return, current finished goods inventory on hand (including
safety stock required to sustain current order fulfillment)
o Assuming optimized inventory practices (no excess inventory)
2.3.45
AG.2.13
Discussion cont.
Cycle Time
o Current logistics order cycle time (all else equal including procurement order cycle time,
supplier lead time, manufacturing cycle time, etc.)
! Customer order processing cycle time (logistics only)
! Dock-to-stock cycle time
! Pick-to-ship cycle time
! Transit time
Deliver: Availability Assessment & Ramp-down/Lead Time
Elements needed to establish delta in resources and what can be ramped down and sustained at
30 days prior to delivery based on the question How much of a decrease in quantities delivered
(expressed as a percentage) can the company sustain without inventory or cost penalties, given 30
days notice prior to delivery
Demand:
o Reduced delivery volume to be determined given ramped down resources below
Labor
o Direct labor availability and percent of labor used in logistics, not used in direct activity
(underutilized FTEs)
o How much labor can be laid-off or diverted to other activities, without cost penalty, to ramp
down to decreased quantities delivered given 30 days notice
Capital/Assets
o Current Internal Capacity utilization
o Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, materials handling equipment, etc.
o Current capital requirements
! Accounting procedures for selling/diverting/recycling assets
! Finance Procedures (outsource vs. in-source, make vs. buy, lease vs. purchase) and
their effect upon ability to terminate leases or sell capital equipment assets.
o How many capital equipment assets can be recycled, diverted or sold without cost penalty,
to ramp down to decreased quantities delivered given 30 days notice
! Facilities, space
! Fleet equipment, materials handling equipment, etc.
Outsourcing Alternatives to capital
o Supplemental Outsource/lease availability
! 3PL facilities, lease building, etc.
! Full service lease fleet, materials handling, etc. equipment
! Outside carriers
o How much supplemental outsourced or leased resources or facilities agreements can be
terminated to ramp down to decreased quantities delivered given 30 days notice
Materials
o All else equal in source, make, return, how much inventory can be shipped or diverted
without cost penalty to ramp down to decreased quantities delivered given 30 days notice
(all else equal in source and make, includes safety stock)
! Transit time
2.3.46
AG.2.13
Discussion cont.
Cycle Time
o Logistics cycle time reestablished and sustained for decreased quantities delivered
given 30 days (all else equal including procurement order cycle time, supplier lead time,
manufacturing cycle time, etc.)
! Customer order processing cycle time (logistics only)
! Dock-to-stock cycle time
! Pick-to-ship cycle time
2.3.47
AG.2.13
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
The dashed line boxes represent optional metrics associated with specific level 3 processes.
2.3.48
AG
Level 3 Agility Metrics
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
AG.3.1
% of labor used in
logistics, not used
in direct activity
AG.3.2
% of labor used
in manufacturing,
not used in direct
activity
M1: Make-to-Stock
M2: Make-to-Order
M3: Engineer-to-Order
AG.3.3
Additional deliver
return volume
AG.3.4
Additional
Delivery volume
AG.3.5
Additional
demand
sourcing-supplier
constraints
AG.3.6
Additional make
volume
AG.3.7
Additional source
return volume
AG.3.8
Additional Source
Volumes
AG.3.9
Additional source
volumes obtained
in 30 days
AG.3.10
Amount
additional capital
obtained in 30
days
2.3.49
AG
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
AG.3.11
Amount
additional
equipment
obtained in 30
days
AG.3.12
Amount
additional
internal space
obtained in 30
days
AG.3.13
Amount
additional
inventory (raw)
received and
made (WIP, FG) in
30 days
AG.3.14
Amount
additional labor
recruited/hired/
trained in 30 days
AG.3.15
Amount
additional staff
recruited/hired/
trained in 30 days
AG.3.16
Amount
additional staff/
labor recruited/
hired/trained in
30 days
AG.3.17
Amount decrease
in inventory (FG)
obtained in 30
days
AG.3.18
Amount decrease
in inventory (Raw,
Purchased FG)
obtained in 30
days
2.3.50
AG
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
AG.3.19
Amount labor
recruited/hired/
trained in 30 days
AG.3.20
Amount labor
that can be laid
off in 30 days
AG.3.21
Amount of
Equipment
recycled,
diverted, or sold
in 30 days
AG.3.22
Amount of
inventory (Raw,
Purchased FG)
obtained in 30
days
AG.3.23
Amount of staff
that can be laidoff in 30 days
AG.3.24
Amount reduced
inventory made
(WIP, FG) in 30
days
AG.3.25
Amount
supplemental
outsourced or
leased resources
or facilities
terminated in 30
Process
2.3.51
AG
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
AG.3.26
Amount
supplemental
outsourced or
leased resources
or faciltiies
obtained in 30
days
AG.3.27
Capital
Availability
AG.3.28
Capital
Requirements
(Acct/Finance
Policy)
AG.3.29
Current Capital
Requirements
AG.3.30
Current capital
requirements
(accounting
policy)
AG.3.31
Current Deliver
Return Volume
AG.3.32
Current Delivery
Volume
AG.3.33
Current internal
equipment
capacity
utilization
AG.3.34
Current Internal
facility/storage
capacity
utilization
2.3.52
AG
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
AG.3.35
Current Internal
Storage capacity
utilization
AG.3.36
Current Inventory
on hand (FG)
AG.3.37
Current Inventory
on Hand (WIP, FG)
AG.3.38
Current Make
Volume
M1: Make-to-Stock
M2: Make-to-Order
M3: Engineer-to-Order
AG.3.39
Current On-hand
inventories (Raw,
Purchased, FG)
AG.3.40
Current Purchase
Order Cycle Times
AG.3.41
Current source
return volume
AG.3.42
Current Source
Volume
AG.3.43
Current Sourcing/
Supplier
Constraints
AG.3.44
Customer return
order cycle time
reestablished and
sustained in 30
days
2.3.53
AG
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
AG.3.45
Customer Service
staff/Logistics
labor availability
AG.3.46
Demand
sourcing-supplier
constraints
AG.3.47
Direct Labor
Availability
AG.3.48
Internal and
External (3PL)
equipment
capacity needed
for current
delivery volume
AG.3.49
Internal and
External (3PL)
Equipment
capacity needed
for current return
volume
AG.3.50
Internal and
External (3PL)
Equipment
needed for
current return
volume
AG.3.51
Internal and
External (3PL)
storage capacity
needed for
current delivery
volume
AG.3.52
Internal and
External (3PL)
storage capacity
needed for
current return
volume
2.3.54
Process
AG
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
AG.3.53
Internal and
External facilities/
storage capacity
needed for
current make
volume
AG.3.54
Internal and
External
manufacturing
equipment
capacity needed
for current make
volume
AG.3.55
Internal Event
Response
(average days)
AG.3.56
Logistics order
cycle time
reestablished and
sustained in 30
days
AG.3.57
Manufacturing
cycle time
reestablished and
sustained in 30
days
AG.3.58
Options Rating
(0-100%)
AG.3.59
Procurement Staff
Availability
AG.3.60
Procurement
staff/Logistics
labor availability
2.3.55
AG
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
AG.3.61
Productivity
orders shipped
per FTE
AG.3.62
Productivityorders returned
per FTE
AG.3.63
ProductivityPurchase orders
per FTE
AG.3.64
Productivityunits/orders
produced per FTE
AG.3.65
Purchase order
cycle time
reestablished and
sustained in 30
days
AG.3.66
Reduced delivery
volume
AG.3.67
Reduced Make
volume
AG.3.68
Reduced
source volumes
accomplished in
30 days
AG.3.69
Supplemental
outsource/lease
availability
AG.3.70
Supplemental
outsource/lease
termination
ability
AG.3.71
Time needed
to increase
inventory (FG) for
additional order
fulfillment
2.3.56
AG
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
AG.3.72
Time needed
to increase
inventory (WIP,
FG) for additional
order fulfillment
AG.3.73
Time needed
to increase
inventory for
additional order
fulfillment (Raw,
Purchase
AG.3.74
Time needed to
obtain additional
capital
AG.3.75
Time needed to
obtain additional
equipment
AG.3.76
Time needed to
obtain additional
internal space
AG.3.77
Time needed
to obtain
supplemental
outsourced
(3PL) or leased
resources or
facilities
2.3.57
AG
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
AG.3.78
Time needed
to obtain
supplemental
outsourced or
leased resources
or facilities
AG.3.79
Time needed to
recruit/hire/train
additional labor
AG.3.80
Time needed to
recruit/hire/train
additional staff
AG.3.81
Time needed to
recruit/hire/train
additional staff/
labor
2.3.58
CO.1.1
Total Supply Chain Management Cost
The sum of the costs associated with the SCOR Level 2 processes to Plan, Source, Deliver, and
Return.
Note - Cost of Raw Material and Make Costs are generally accounted for in COGS. It is
recognized that there is likely to be overlap/ redundancy between supply chain management
costs and COGS.
Qualitative Relationship Description
None Identified
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
TSCMC = Cost to Plan + Source + Make + Deliver + Return + Mitigate Supply Chain Risk
Calculation
TSCMC = Sales Profits Cost to Serve (e.g., marketing, selling, administrative)
Data Collection
Resource expenses (e.g., salaries, supplies, etc.) are initially captured in the organizations general
ledger accounting system. Then these expenses are traced and assigned (i.e., distributed) to the
organizations horizontal core processes based employee time and non wage-related factors (drivers;
e.g., # of units consumed). Data for these expense distribution assignments are collected from (1)
employee time collection systems (or % split estimates), and (2) operational systems (e.g., enterprise
resource planning [ERP] systems).
Discussion
Collecting transactional information, primarily resource expenses and operational drivers, is now
commonplace. The challenging task is to logically transform these expenses into calculated costs of
the horizontal processes based on cause-and-effect relationships without the temptation of using
broad averages or arbitrary factors.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
2.4.1
CO.1.2
Cost of Goods Sold
The cost associated with buying raw materials and producing finished goods. This cost
includes direct costs (labor, materials) and indirect costs (overhead).
Note - Cost of Raw Material and Make Costs are generally accounted for in COGS. It
is recognized that there is likely to be overlap/ redundancy between supply chain
management costs and COGS.
Qualitative Relationship Description
None Identified
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) = Cost to Make
Calculation
COGS = direct material costs + direct labor costs + indirect costs related to making product
Data Collection
Resource expenses (e.g., salaries, supplies, etc.) are initially captured in the organizations general
ledger accounting system. Then these expenses are traced and assigned (i.e., distributed) to the
organizations horizontal core processes based employee time and non wage-related factors
(drivers; e.g., # of units consumed). Data for these expense distribution assignments are collected
from (1) employee time collection systems (or % split estimates), and (2) operational systems (e.g.,
enterprise resource planning [ERP] systems).
Discussion
Collecting transactional information, primarily resource expenses and operational drivers, is now
commonplace. The challenging task is to logically transform these expenses into calculated costs of
the horizontal processes based on cause-and-effect relationships without the temptation of using
broad averages or arbitrary factors.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
2.4.2
CO.2.1
Cost to Plan
The sum of the costs associated with Plan. (Processes: P1, P2, P3, P4, P5)
Qualitative Relationship Description
None Identified
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
Cost to Plan = Sum of Cost to Plan (Plan + Source + Make + Deliver + Return)
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
Resource expenses (e.g., salaries, supplies, etc.) are initially captured in the organizations general
ledger accounting system. Then these expenses are traced and assigned (i.e., distributed) to the
organizations horizontal core processes based employee time and non wage-related factors (drivers;
e.g., # of units consumed). Data for these expense distribution assignments are collected from (1)
employee time collection systems (or % split estimates), and (2) operational systems (e.g., enterprise
resource planning [ERP] systems).
Discussion
Collecting transactional information, primarily resource expenses and operational drivers, is now
commonplace. The challenging task is to logically transform these expenses into calculated costs of
the horizontal processes based on cause-and-effect relationships without the temptation of using
broad averages or arbitrary factors.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
2.4.3
CO.2.2
Cost to Source
The sum of the costs associated with Source. (Processes: S1, S2, S3)
Qualitative Relationship Description
None Identified
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
Cost to Source = Sum of Cost for (Supplier Management + Material Acquisition Management)
Calculation
t
t
Data Collection
Resource expenses (e.g., salaries, supplies, etc.) are initially captured in the organizations general
ledger accounting system. Then these expenses are traced and assigned (i.e., distributed) to the
organizations horizontal core processes based employee time and non wage-related factors (drivers;
e.g., # of units consumed). Data for these expense distribution assignments are collected from (1)
employee time collection systems (or % split estimates), and (2) operational systems (e.g., enterprise
resource planning [ERP] systems).
Discussion
Collecting transactional information, primarily resource expenses and operational drivers, is now
commonplace. The challenging task is to logically transform these expenses into calculated costs of
the horizontal processes based on cause-and-effect relationships without the temptation of using
broad averages or arbitrary factors.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
2.4.4
CO.2.3
Cost to Make
The sum of the costs associated with Make.
Note - Cost of Raw Material and Make Costs are generally accounted for in COGS. It is
recognized that there is likely to be overlap/ redundancy between supply chain management
costs and COGS. (Processes: M1, M2, M3)
Qualitative Relationship Description
None Identified
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
None Identified
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
None Identified
Discussion
None Identified
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
2.4.5
CO.2.3
Cost to Make
The sum of the costs associated with Make. (Processes: M1, M2, M3)
Qualitative Relationship Description
None Identified
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
Cost to Make = Sum of Direct Material, Direct Labor, and Direct non-Material Product-related Cost
(equipment) and of Indirect Product-related Cost
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
Resource expenses (e.g., salaries, supplies, etc.) are initially captured in the organizations general
ledger accounting system. Then these expenses are traced and assigned (i.e., distributed) to the
organizations horizontal core processes based employee time and non wage-related factors (drivers;
e.g., # of units consumed). Data for these expense distribution assignments are collected from (1)
employee time collection systems (or % split estimates), and (2) operational systems (e.g., enterprise
resource planning [ERP] systems). In some cases, (1) direct material data is maintained at the unit
level in bills of material (BOMs) or recipe formulas; and (2) direct labor and direct non-material
product (equipment) data is maintained at the unit level in labor/machine routings or process
sheets.
Discussion
Collecting transactional information, primarily resource expenses and operational drivers, is now
commonplace. The challenging task is to logically transform these expenses into calculated costs
of (1) the horizontal processes (referenced in Lean environments as value-stream mapping), and
(2) products (or intermediate outputs) with both types of calculations based on cause-and-effect
relationships without the temptation of using broad averages or arbitrary factors.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
2.4.6
CO.2.4
Cost to Deliver and/or Install
The sum of the costs associated with Deliver and/or Install. (Processes: D1, D2, D3)
Qualitative Relationship Description
None Identified
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
Cost to Deliver = Sum of Cost of ( Sales order management + Customer Management )
Calculation
t
t
Sales order management = inquiry & quotations + order entry & maintenance + channel
management + order fulfillment + distribution + transportation + outbound freight and duties +
installation + customer invoicing / accounting + new product release / phase-in + etc.
Customer Management = financing + post-sales customer service + handling disputes + field
repairs + enabling technologies + etc.
Data Collection
Resource expenses (e.g., salaries, supplies, etc.) are initially captured in the organizations general
ledger accounting system. Then these expenses are traced and assigned (i.e., distributed) to the
organizations horizontal core processes based employee time and non wage-related factors (drivers;
e.g., # of units consumed). Data for these expense distribution assignments are collected from (1)
employee time collection systems (or % split estimates), and (2) operational systems (e.g., enterprise
resource planning [ERP] systems).
Discussion
Collecting transactional information, primarily resource expenses and operational drivers, is now
commonplace. The challenging task is to logically transform these expenses into calculated costs of
the horizontal processes based on cause-and-effect relationships without the temptation of using
broad averages or arbitrary factors.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Customer Management
(See processes under Deliver)
2.4.7
CO.2.5
Cost to Return
Cost to Return Defective Product - The sum of the costs associated with returning a defective
product to the supplier. (Processes: SR1, DR1) Cost to Return Excess Product - The sum of the
costs associated with returning excess product to the supplier. (Processes: SR3, DR3) Cost to
Return MRO Product - The sum of the costs associated with returning MRO product to the
supplier. (Processes: SR2, DR2)
Qualitative Relationship Description
None Identified
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
Cost to Return = Sum of Cost to Return ( to Sources + from Customers )
Calculation
t
t
Cost to Return to Source (SRx) = Verify Defective Product Costs + Disposition of Defective Product
Costs + Identify MRO Condition Costs + Request MRO Return Authorization Costs + Schedule
MRO Shipment Costs + Return MRO Product Costs + etc.
Cost to Return From Customer (DRx) = Authorization Costs + Schedule Return Costs + Receive
Costs + Authorize MRO Return Costs + Schedule MRO Return Costs + Receive MRO Return Costs
+ Transfer MRO Product Costs + etc.
Data Collection
Resource expenses (e.g., salaries, supplies, etc.) are initially captured in the organizations general
ledger accounting system. Then these expenses are traced and assigned (i.e., distributed) to the
organizations horizontal core processes based employee time and non wage-related factors (drivers;
e.g., # of units consumed). Data for these expense distribution assignments are collected from (1)
employee time collection systems (or % split estimates), and (2) operational systems (e.g., enterprise
resource planning [ERP] systems).
Discussion
Collecting transactional information, primarily resource expenses and operational drivers, is now
commonplace. The challenging task is to logically transform these expenses into calculated costs of
the horizontal processes based on cause-and-effect relationships without the temptation of using
broad averages or arbitrary factors.
2.4.8
CO.2.5
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
2.4.9
CO.2.6
Supply Chain Value at Risk (VAR)
Value at Risk the sum of the probability of risk events times the monetary impact of
the events for all the supply chain functions (e.g. Plan, Source, Make, Deliver and Return).
(Processes: EP.9, ES.9, EM.9, ED.9, ER.9).
Qualitative Relationship Description
Value at Risk the sum of the probability of risk events times the monetary impact of the events for
all the supply chain functions (e.g. Plan, Source, Make, Deliver and Return).
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
Supply Chain Risk VAR ($) = Sum of Supply Chain VAR $ (Plan + Source + Make + Deliver + Return)
Calculation
Supply Chain Risk VAR ($) = VAR $ (Plan) + VAR $ (Source) + VAR $ (Make) + VAR $ (Deliver) + VAR $
(Return)
Data Collection
The VaR calculation uses historical data on the specific event (on time delivery, quality, disruptions,
failures, etc) to calculate the number of times the event performed below the target (probability)
times the amount below the target. For disruptions, VaR would use estimated frequency based upon
expert resources times the impact of the event.
Discussion
VaR can be used in the supply chain to evaluate the different aspects of risk. Suppliers can be
evaluated base upon the VaR of performance measures. Customers can also be measured based
upon performance measures (profitability, volume growth, returns, and complaints) as well as
products (warranty claims, etc.). VaR can also be applied to internal supply chain entities such as
manufacturing, distribution or sales locations.
Since VaR can be monitarized by accessing the cost of performance below target, VaR can be
rolled up and examined by any demographic or data cut (by region, by customer, by supplier, etc.).
Suppliers can be evaluated based upon VaR and ranked according to the risk of poor performance.
Caveats in using VaR :
VaR calculates the probability of non-adherence to metrics value (expected value) based on historical
data. Hence, it is a retrospective view of the event risk. The same may or may not be applicable in the
future.
VaR is a downside Risk Metrics. It calculates maximum loss for each level of confidence (probability).
In a real life scenario, it is likely that the losses would be less than calculated using VaR.
Calculating VaR from historical data requires a large database of events and metrics, and it could be
computationally intensive.
2.4.10
CO.2.6
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
2.4.11
CO.2.7
Supply Chain Risk Mitigation Cost
The sum of the costs associated with Supply Chain Risk Mitigation Costs. (Processes: EP.9,
ES.9, EM.9, ED.9, ER.9)
Qualitative Relationship Description
None Identified
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
Mitigation Costs (Cost to Mitigate Supply Chain Risk) = Sum of Supply Chain Risk Mitigation Costs
(Plan + Source + Make + Deliver + Return)
Calculation
None Identified
Data Collection
Mitigation Cost - The total supply chain risk mitigation cost of all mitigation actions for a specific area,
supplier, product, etc. ($)
Discussion
None Identified
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
2.4.12
CO
Level 3 Cost Metrics
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.1
% Defective
Product
Scheduling Cost
to Total Source
Return Cost
CO.3.2
% Excess Product
Scheduling Cost
to Total Source
Return Cost
CO.3.3
% MRO
Scheduling Cost
to Total Source
Return Cost
CO.3.4
% of
authorization
request
transmitted
error-free/total
authorization
requests
CO.3.5
% of excess
packaging per
unit
M1.4: Package
M2.4: Package
M3.5: Package
CO.3.6
% of paints used
that are non-toxic
CO.3.7
% of pallets that
are reusable
CO.3.8
% of solid waste
consisting of
packaging
material
CO.3.9
% of trucks using
retread tires
2.4.13
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.10
% of vehicle fuel
derived from
alternative fuels
CO.3.11
% of warehouse
loading
machinery using
MFBs
CO.3.12
% packaging
material
consisting of
post-consumer
recycled content
M1.4: Package
M2.4: Package
M3.5: Package
CO.3.13
% packaging
material that is
biodegradable
M1.4: Package
M2.4: Package
M3.5: Package
CO.3.14
% packaging
material that
is recyclable/
reusable
M1.4: Package
M2.4: Package
M3.5: Package
CO.3.15
Air emissions
CO.3.16
Assessment / Risk
Management
Costs ($)
CO.3.17
Cost of
identifying
the defective
condition
as a % of total
Source cost
2.4.14
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.18
Cost of
Identifying
the MRO
Condition
as a % of Total
Source
Return Cost
CO.3.19
Cost of
identifying the
excess condition
as a % of total
Source cost
CO.3.20
Cost per
request
authorization
CO.3.21
Cost to Align
Supply Chain
Unit Plan with
Financial Plan
CO.3.22
Cost to Assess
Delivery
Performance
CO.3.23
Cost to Assess
Supplier
Performance
CO.3.24
Cost to Authorize
Defective Product
Return
CO.3.25
Cost to Authorize
Excess Product
Return
CO.3.26
Cost to Authorize
MRO Product
Return
CO.3.27
Cost to Authorize
Supplier Payment
2.4.15
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.28
Cost to Balance
Production
Resources with
Production
Requirements
CO.3.29
Cost to Balance
Product
Resources
with Product
Requirements
CO.3.30
Cost to Balance
Supply Chain
Resources with
Supply Chain
Requirements
CO.3.31
Cost to Build
Loads
CO.3.32
Cost to Checkout
D4.6: Checkout
CO.3.33
Cost to
Consolidate
Orders
CO.3.34
Cost to Deliver
and/or Install
CO.3.35
Cost to Deliver
Return
CO.3.36
Cost to Enter
Order, Commit
Resources &
Launch Program
CO.3.37
Cost to
Establish and
Communicate
Return Plans
CO.3.38
Cost to
Establish and
Communicate
Supply Chain
Plans
2.4.16
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.39
Cost to Establish
Delivery Plans
CO.3.40
Cost to Establish
Production Plans
CO.3.41
Cost to Establish
Sourcing Plans
CO.3.42
Cost to Fill
Shopping Cart
CO.3.43
Cost to Finalize
Production
Engineering
CO.3.44
Cost to Generate
Stocking
Schedule
CO.3.45
Cost to Identify
Sources of Supply
CO.3.46
Cost to Identify,
Assess, and
Aggregate
Delivery
Resources
CO.3.47
Cost to Identify,
Assess, and
Aggregate
Product
Resources
CO.3.48
Cost to Identify,
Assess, and
Aggregate
Production
Resources
CO.3.49
Cost to Identify,
Assess, and
Aggregate Return
Resources
CO.3.50
Cost to Identify,
Assess, and
Aggregate Supply
Chain Resources
2.4.17
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.51
Cost to Identify,
Prioritize, and
Aggregate
Delivery
Requirements
CO.3.52
Cost to Identify,
Prioritize, and
Aggregate
Product
Requirements
CO.3.53
Cost to Identify,
Prioritize, and
Aggregate
Production
Requirements
CO.3.54
Cost to Identify,
Prioritize, and
Aggregate Return
Requirements
CO.3.55
Cost to Identify,
Prioritize, and
Aggregate
Supply Chain
Requirements
CO.3.56
Cost to Install
Product
CO.3.57
Cost to Invoice
D1.15: Invoice
CO.3.58
Cost to Issue
Material
CO.3.59
Cost to Issue
Sourced/InProcess Product
CO.3.60
Cost to Load
Product &
Generate
Shipping
Documentation
CO.3.61
Cost to Maintain
Source Data
2.4.18
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.62
Cost to Manage
Business Rules for
PLAN Processes
CO.3.63
Cost to Manage
Business Rules for
Return Processes
CO.3.64
Cost to Manage
Deliver Business
Rules
CO.3.65
Cost to Manage
Deliver Capital
Assets
CO.3.66
Cost to Manage
Deliver
Information
CO.3.67
Cost to Manage
Finished Goods
Inventories
CO.3.68
Cost to Manage
Import/Export
Requirements
CO.3.69
Cost to Manage
In-Process
Products (WIP)
CO.3.70
Cost to Manage
Incoming Product
CO.3.71
Cost to Manage
Integrated Supply
Chain Capital
Assets
CO.3.72
Cost to Manage
Integrated Supply
Chain Inventory
CO.3.73
Cost to Manage
Integrated
Supply Chain
Transportation
CO.3.74
Cost to Manage
MAKE Equipment
and Facilities
2.4.19
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.75
Cost to Manage
MAKE Information
CO.3.76
Cost to Manage
MAKE Regulatory
Compliance
CO.3.77
Cost to Manage
Performance of
Return Processes
CO.3.78
Cost to Manage
Performance of
Supply Chain
CO.3.79
Cost to Manage
PLAN Data
Collection
CO.3.80
Cost to Manage
Plan Regulatory
Requirements
and Compliance
CO.3.81
Cost to Manage
Planning
Configuration
CO.3.82
Cost to Manage
Product Inventory
CO.3.83
Cost to Manage
Product Life Cycle
CO.3.84
Cost to Manage
Production
Network
CO.3.85
Cost to Manage
Production
Performance
CO.3.86
Cost to Manage
Production Rules
CO.3.87
Cost to Manage
Return Capital
Assets
CO.3.88
Cost to Manage
Return Data
Collection
CO.3.89
Cost to Manage
Return Inventory
2.4.20
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.90
Cost to Manage
Return Network
Configuration
CO.3.91
Cost to Manage
Return Regulatory
Requirements
and Compliance
CO.3.92
Cost to
Manage Return
Transportation
CO.3.93
Cost to Manage
Source Capital
Assets
CO.3.94
Cost to Manage
Sourcing Business
Rules
CO.3.95
Cost to Manage
Supplier
Agreements
CO.3.96
Cost to Manage
Supplier Network
CO.3.97
Cost to Manage
Transportation
CO.3.98
Cost to Negotiate
& Receive
Contract
CO.3.99
Cost to Obtain
& Respond to
Request for Quote
(RFQ) / Request
for Proposal (RFP)
CO.3.100
Cost to Pack
Product
CO.3.101
Cost to Package
M1.4: Package
M2.4: Package
M3.5: Package
CO.3.102
Cost to Pick
Product
CO.3.103
Cost to Pick
Product from
Backroom
2.4.21
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.104
Cost to Plan
Deliver
CO.3.105
CO.3.106
Cost to Plan
Return
CO.3.107
Cost to Plan
Source
CO.3.108
Cost to Plan
Supply Chain
CO.3.109
Cost to Process
Inquiry & Quote
CO.3.110
Cost to Produce
and Test
CO.3.111
CO.3.112
Cost to Receive
Defective Product
CO.3.113
Cost to Receive
Excess Product
CO.3.114
Cost to Receive
MRO Product
CO.3.115
Cost to Receive
Product
CO.3.116
Cost to Receive
Product at Store
CO.3.117
Cost to Receive
Product from
Source or Make
CO.3.118
Cost to Receive,
Enter & Validate
Order
2.4.22
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.119
Cost to Release
Finished Product
to Deliver
CO.3.120
Cost to Reserve
Resources &
Determine
Delivery Date
CO.3.121
Cost to Route
Shipments
CO.3.122
Cost to Schedule
Defective Product
Receipt
CO.3.123
Cost to Schedule
Excess Product
Receipt
CO.3.124
Cost to Schedule
Installation
CO.3.125
Cost to Schedule
MRO Product
Receipt
CO.3.126
Cost to Schedule
Product Deliveries
CO.3.127
Cost to Schedule
Production
Activities
CO.3.128
Cost to Select
Carriers & Rate
Shipments
CO.3.129
Cost to Select
Final Supplier(s)
and Negotiate
CO.3.130
Cost to Ship
Product
2.4.23
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.131
Cost to Source
Return
CO.3.132
Cost to Stage
Finished Product
CO.3.133
Cost to Stock
Shelf
CO.3.134
Cost to Transfer
Defective Product
CO.3.135
Cost to Transfer
Excess Product
CO.3.136
Cost to Transfer
MRO Product
CO.3.137
Cost to Transfer
Product
CO.3.138
Cost to Verify
Product
CO.3.139
Customer
Invoicing/
Accounting
Costs
D1.15: Invoice,
D2.15: Invoice,
D3.15: Invoice
CO.3.140
CO.3.141
Direct material
cost
CO.3.142
Distribution Costs
CO.3.143
Energy
consumption
CO.3.144
2.4.24
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.145
Energy Costs
CO.3.146
Energy efficient
upgrades
CO.3.147
Environmental
Compliance Cost
CO.3.148
Environmental
non-compliance
cost
CO.3.149
CO.3.150
Excess product
disposition costs
as % total
Source cost
CO.3.151
Finished Goods
Inventory Days
of Supply
2.4.25
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.152
CO.3.153
Hazardous waste
generated at
warehousing
facilities as %
of total waste
generated
CO.3.154
Hedge Rating
(Inventory
DOS for risk
management)
CO.3.155
Indirect cost
related to
production
CO.3.156
Individual Process
Area Event Rating
(EVAR) ($)
CO.3.157
Industry
Benchmark
Comparison (%)
2.4.26
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.158
CO.3.159
Mitigation cost by
Event ($)
CO.3.160
MRO Disposition
Costs As % Total
Source cost
CO.3.161
NPDES permitted
water effluent
CO.3.162
Number of
worker absences
due to poor IAQ
CO.3.163
Order
Management
Costs
CO.3.164
Packaging
material re-use
M1.4: Package
M3.5: Package
ES.4: Manage Product Inventory
CO.3.165
Packaging
purchases
CO.3.166
Packaging
volume
CO.3.167
CO.3.168
Pollution
Prevention Ratio
2.4.27
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.169
Product
Acquisition Costs
CO.3.170
Product
Packaging costs
CO.3.171
Product Shipped
per delivery
CO.3.172
Quantity per
shipment
CO.3.173
Ratio of
Authorization
Cost To Total
Source
Cost
CO.3.174
Ratio of
Authorization
Cost to Total
Source Return
cost
CO.3.175
Ratio of
authorization
costs to total
source return cost
2.4.28
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.176
CO.3.177
Return
transportation
costs
CO.3.178
Risk Mitigation
Costs (Deliver)
CO.3.179
Risk Mitigation
Costs (Make)
CO.3.180
Risk Mitigation
Costs (Plan)
CO.3.181
Risk Mitigation
Costs (Return)
CO.3.182
Risk Mitigation
Costs (Source)
CO.3.183
Scrap packaging
expense
M1.4: Package
M2.4: Package
M3.5: Package
CO.3.184
Supply /
Customer /
Product Base
Rated (%)
CO.3.185
Total Deliver
Costs
2.4.29
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.186
Total Excess
Material Return
Costs
CO.3.187
Total Source
Return Costs
CO.3.188
Transportation
Costs
CO.3.189
Value at Risk
(Deliver)
CO.3.190
Value at Risk
(Make)
CO.3.191
Value at Risk
(Return)
CO.3.192
Value at Risk
(Source)
CO.3.193
VAR of Internal
Process
Performance
2.4.30
CO
Metric ID
Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
CO.3.194
VAR of Supplier
Performance
CO.3.195
Warehouse
energy costs
CO.3.196
Warehousing
solid waste
CO.3.197
Waste produced
as % of product
produced
CO.3.198
Waste storage
costs as % of
Make costs
CO.3.199
Water use
reduction
2.4.31
2.4.32
AM.1.1
Cash-to-Cash Cycle Time
The time it takes for an investment made to flow back into a company after it has been spent
for raw materials. For services, this represents the time from the point where a company
pays for the resources consumed in the performance of a service to the time that the
company received payment from the customer for those services.
Qualitative Relationship Description
The longer the cash-to-cash cycle, the more current assets needed (relative to current liabilities) since
it takes longer to convert inventories and receivables into cash. In other words, the longer the cashto-cash cycle, the more net working capital required.
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
The Cash-to-Cash Cycle time is measured by converting into days the supply of inventory in stock
and the number of days outstanding for accounts receivable and accounts payable. The inventory
days of supply is added to the days outstanding for accounts receivable. The accounts payable days
outstanding is subtracted from this total to determine the cash-to-cash cycle time.
Calculation
Cash-to-Cash Cycle Time = Inventory Days of Supply + Days Sales Outstanding Days Payable
Outstanding
Level 2 Metrics:
AM.2.2 Inventory Days of Supply = the amount of inventory (stock) expressed in days of sales. The
[5 point rolling average of gross value of inventory at standard cost] / [annual cost of goods sold
(COGS) / 365]
Example: If 2 items a day are sold and 20 items are held in inventory, this represents 10 days (20/2)
sales in inventory.
(Other names: Days cost-of-sales in inventory, Days sales in inventory)
AM.2.1 Days Sales Outstanding = the length of time from when a sale is made until cash for it is
received from customers. The amount of sales outstanding expressed in days. The [5 point rolling
average of gross accounts receivable (AR)] / [total gross annual sales / 365].
Example: If $5000 worth of sales were made per day and $50,000 worth of sales were outstanding,
this would represent 10 days ($50,000/$5000) of sales outstanding.
(Other names: Days sales in Accounts receivables)
AM.2.3 Days Payable Outstanding = the length of time from purchasing materials, labor and/
or conversion resources until cash payments must be made expressed in days. The [5 point rolling
average of gross accounts payable (AP)] / [total gross annual material purchases / 365].
(Other names: Average payment period for materials, Days purchases in accounts payable, Days
2.5.1
AM.1.1
Calculation cont.
The 5 point rolling average calculation uses a combination of both historical and forward-looking
data. This means that the rolling average value has to be calculated based on the average over the
four previous quarters and the projection for the current or next quarter.
The 5 point rolling average calculation is:
[Sum of the 4 previous quarters + projection for next quarter) / 5]
Data Collection
Unlike the other SCOR attributes, where data requirements are specified, typically all of the cash-tocash cycle time source data is already captured by business operating systems:
t general ledger system
t accounts receivable system
t accounts payable system
t purchasing system
t production reporting system
t customer relationship management system
As a result, information is calculated by importing data from these systems and transforming them
into the prescribed analytics/information. The transformation is accomplished using business rules.
Discussion
Cash-to-cash Cycle Time is a value metric used to measure how efficiently a company manages its
working capital assets.
This metric is a generally accepted Supply Chain metric within many industries and is used to
benchmark supply chain asset management performance.
The term 5 point annual average can be confusing in that it can imply a measure over a years
period of time when the data points are taken over 5 quarters. The intent of the approach is to
smooth the seasonal peaks and valleys over time and to balance projected data with historical data.
The measurement can be taken quarterly or at any given consistent time frame.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
2.5.2
AM.1.2
Return on Supply Chain Fixed Assets
Return on Supply Chain Fixed Assets measures the return an organization receives on its
invested capital in supply chain fixed assets. This includes the fixed assets used in Plan,
Source, Make, Deliver, and Return.
Qualitative Relationship Description
None Identified
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
The return on supply chain fixed assets is measured by monetizing the supply chain revenue, cost of
goods sold and supply chain management costs to determine the profit from the respective supply
chain. This amount is divided by the supply chain fixed assets to determine the return generated
from the respective supply chain.
Calculation
Return on Supply Chain Fixed Assets = (Supply Chain Revenue COGS Supply Chain
Management Costs) / Supply-Chain Fixed Assets
Supply Chain Revenue is used in the metric rather than just Net Revenue. SC Revenue is calculated
as: Supply Chain Revenue - COGS - Total Supply Chain Management Costs. This provides the
revenue generated through the supply chain less the total costs associated with the supply chain.
There is a need for a more specific revenue number than Net Revenue for use in the Supply Chain
Revenue level 2 metric. Net Revenue could include revenue from sources other than the supply
chain, such as investments, leasing real estate, court settlements, etc... Supply Chain Revenue will be
used and will be only the portion of Net Revenue that is generated by the specific supply chain being
measured and analyzed.
Level 2 Metrics
Supply-Chain Revenue
Operating revenue generated from a supply chain. This does not include non-operating revenue,
such as leasing real estate, investments, court settlements, sale of office buildings, etc...
CO.1.2 COGS (Cost of Goods Sold)
Calculation - Refer to the section for COGS in the Attribute for Costs.
CO.1.1 Total Supply Chain Management Costs
Calculation - refer to the section for Supply-Chain Management Costs in the Attribute for Costs.
AM.2.5 Supply Chain Fixed Assets
Source Fixed Asset Value +
Make Fixed Asset Value +
Deliver Fixed Asset Value +
Return Fixed Asset Value +
Plan Fixed Asset Value
2.5.3
AM.1.2
Calculation cont.
Level 3 Metrics
Plan Fixed Asset Value- The current value of the supply chain assets used in supply chain integration
(See EP.5)
Source Fixed Asset Value - The current value of the supply chain assets used in the Source process.
(See ES.5)
Make Fixed Asset Value- The current value of the supply chain assets used in the Make process. (See
EM.5)
Deliver Fixed Asset Value - The current value of the supply chain assets used in the Deliver process.
(See ED.5)
Return Fixed Asset Value - The current value of the supply chain assets used in the Return process.
(See ER.5)
A Revised Capital Plan is an output of the Manage Integrated Supply Chain Fixed Assets (EP.5) process
element and would contain supply chain capital asset information that could be used in measuring
the Supply Chain Fixed Assets.
Data Collection
Unlike the other SCOR attributes, where data requirements are specified, typically all of the return on
working capitals source data is already captured by business operating systems:
t general ledger system
t fixed asset system
t purchasing system
t labor reporting system
t production reporting system
t customer relationship management system
As a result, information is calculated by importing data from these systems and transforming them
into the prescribed analytics/information. The transformation is accomplished using business rules.
In order to measure Return on Supply Chain Fixed Assets, the investment in supply chain capital
assets needs to be known. This requires a clear understanding of what is a supply chain fixed asset.
SCOR Ex.5 process elements were used since these are all focused on managing SC capital assets. It is
the assets managed in these Enable processes that comprise Supply Chain Fixed Assets. The value of
these assets is the denominator of the metric.
Discussion
Range of fixed assets used in an organization that have the character of permanency rather
than being rapidly replaced (or expensed); examples include land, warehouse, trucks, buildings,
investments, and plant and machinery.
Fixed assets used to operate the Supply Chain in each of the categories (P, S, M, D, R) are tracked
within the Ex.5 process elements. A Revised Capital Plan is an output of the Manage Integrated
Supply Chain Fixed Assets (EP.5) process element and would contain supply chain capital asset
information that could be used in measuring the Supply Chain Fixed Asset Value.
2.5.4
AM.1.2
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
2.5.5
AM.1.3
Return on Working Capital
Return on working capital is a measurement which assesses the magnitude of investment
relative to a companys working capital position verses the revenue generated from a supply
chain. Components include accounts receivable, accounts payable, inventory, supply chain
revenue, cost of goods sold and supply chain management costs. (Processes: P1, P2, P3, P4,
S1, S2, S3, M1, M2, M3, D1, D2, D3, D4)
Qualitative Relationship Description
None Identified
Quantitative Relationship (optional, if calculable)
The return on working capital is measured by monetizing the supply chain profit and dividing into
the calculated amount the supply chain working capital position.
Calculation
Return on Working Capital = (Supply Chain Revenue COGS Supply Chain Management Costs) /
(Inventory + Accounts Receivable Accounts Payable)
Level 2 Metrics:
Supply-Chain Revenue
Operating revenue generated from a supply chain. This does not include non-operating revenue,
such as leasing real estate, investments, court settlements, sale of office buildings, etc...
CO.1.2 COGS (Cost of Goods Sold)
Calculation - Refer to the section for COGS in the Attribute for Costs.
CO.1.1 Total Supply Chain Management Costs
Calculation - refer to the section for Supply-Chain Management Costs in the Attribute for Costs.
AM.2.8 Inventory = the amount of inventory (stock) expressed in dollars. The [5 point rolling
average of gross value of inventory at standard cost]
AM.2.7 Sales Outstanding = the amount of accounts receivable outstanding expressed in dollars.
The [5 point rolling average of gross accounts receivable (AR)]
AM.2.6 Payables Outstanding = expressed in dollars, the amount of purchased materials, labor
and/or conversion resources that are to be paid (accounts payable). The [5 point rolling average of
gross accounts payable (A/P)]
The 5 point rolling average calculation uses a combination of both historical and forward-looking
data. This means that the rolling average value has to be calculated based on the average over the
four previous quarters and the projection for the current or next quarter.
The 5 point rolling average calculation is: [Sum of the 4 previous quarters + projection for next
quarter) / 5]
2.5.6
AM.1.3
Calculation cont.
Level 3 Metrics
Plan Fixed Asset Value- The current value of the supply chain assets used in supply chain integration
(See EP.5)
Source Fixed Asset Value - The current value of the supply chain assets used in the Source process.
(See ES.5)
Make Fixed Asset Value- The current value of the supply chain assets used in the Make process. (See
EM.5)
Deliver Fixed Asset Value - The current value of the supply chain assets used in the Deliver process.
(See ED.5)
Return Fixed Asset Value - The current value of the supply chain assets used in the Return process.
(See ER.5)
A Revised Capital Plan is an output of the Manage Integrated Supply Chain Fixed Assets (EP.5)
process element and would contain supply chain capital asset information that could be used in
measuring the Supply Chain Fixed Assets.
Data Collection
Unlike the other SCOR attributes, where data requirements are specified, typically all of the return on
working capitals source data is already captured by business operating systems:
t general ledger system
t accounts receivable system
t accounts payable system
t purchasing system
t labor reporting system
t production reporting system
t customer relationship management system
As a result, information is calculated by importing data from these systems and transforming them
into the prescribed analytics/information. The transformation is accomplished using business rules.
Discussion
Supply Chain Revenue is used in the metric rather than just Net Revenue. SC Revenue is calculated
as: Supply Chain Revenue - COGS - Total Supply Chain Management Costs. This provides the revenue
generated through the supply chain less the total costs associated with the supply chain. There is a
need for a more specific revenue number than Net Revenue for use in the Supply Chain Revenue
level 2 metric. Net Revenue could include revenue from sources other than the supply chain, such as
investments, leasing real estate, court settlements, etc... Supply Chain Revenue will be used and will
be only the portion of Net Revenue that is generated by the specific supply chain being measured
and analyzed.
2.5.7
AM.1.3
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
2.5.8
AM
Level 3 Asset Management Metrics
Metric ID Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
AM.3.1
% of hazardous material in
inventory
AM.3.2
AM.3.3
AM.3.4
% of packaging/shipping
materials reused internally
M2.4: Package
AM.3.5
% of production materials
reused
AM.3.6
% of products consisting of
previously used components
AM.3.7
AM.3.8
Average age of
Excess Inventory
AM.3.9
Capacity Utilization
2.5.9
AM
Metric ID Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
AM.3.10
Defective product
disposition costs
as % total Source
Return cost
AM.3.11
AM.3.12
AM.3.13
AM.3.14
AM.3.15
AM.3.16
AM.3.17
AM.3.18
AM.3.19
Packaging as % of total
material
AM.3.20
2.5.10
AM
Metric ID Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
AM.3.21
AM.3.22
M1: Make-to-stock
M2: Make-to- Order
M3: Engineer-to-Order
AM.3.23
Recycle DOS
AM.3.24
AM.3.25
AM.3.26
Return Rate
AM.3.27
AM.3.28
Value of defective
product inventory/ total
defective product inventory
value
AM.3.29
AM.3.30
AM.3.31
Value of defective
product inventory
in physical return
2.5.11
AM
Metric ID Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
AM.3.32
Value of defective
product in scheduling
stage/ total
defective product
AM.3.33
AM.3.34
AM.3.35
AM.3.36
Value of excess
inventory in
identification
stage/ total
inventory value
AM.3.37
Value of excess
inventory/ total
inventory value
AM.3.38
Value of excess
product in scheduling
stage/ total
excess product inv
AM.3.39
AM.3.40
AM.3.41
AM.3.42
Value of Unserviceable
MRO Inv. in
Identification Stage/
Total MRO Inv. Value
AM.3.43
Value of Unserviceable
MRO Inventory in Scheduling
Stage/Total MRO Inventory
2.5.12
AM
Metric ID Metric Name
Metric Definition
Process
AM.3.44
Value of Unserviceable
MRO Inventory in
Deliver Return Process/
Total MRO Inv.
2.5.13
2.5.14
Section 3
Processes
P
Plan
The processes associated with determining requirements and corrective actions to achieve
supply chain objectives.
Process Categories
P1: Plan Supply Chain
3.1.1
P1
Plan Supply Chain
The development and establishment of courses of action over specified time periods
that represent a projected appropriation of supply chain resources to meet supply chain
requirements for the longest time fence constraints of supply resources.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
3.1.2
P1
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
3.1.3
P1
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Environmental Management
System (EMS)
3.1.4
P1
Revises Business Assumptions EP.10, EP.5
Customer Requirements
Revised Aggregate Forecast and Projections EP.10
Shipments D1.11,D1.3
Planning Data EP.3
Order Backlog D1.11, D1.3, D2.3, D3.3
! P1.1 !
A
Planning Data EP.3
Inventory
Delivery Plans P4.4
Make/Buy Decision EP.5
Outsource Plan EP.5, EP.6
Production Plans P3.4
Return Regulatory Requirement ER.8
Sourcing Plans P2.4
Revised Capital Plan EP.5, EP.6
! P1.2 !
! P1.3
P1.4 !
3.1.5
P1.1
Identify, Prioritize and Aggregate Supply Chain Requirements
The process of identifying, aggregating, and prioritizing, all sources of demand for the
integrated supply chain of a product or service at the appropriate level, horizon and interval.
The sales forecast is comprised of the following concepts: sales forecasting level, time
horizon, and time interval. The sales forecasting level is the focal point in the corporate
hierarchy where the forecast is needed at the most generic level. i.e. Corporate forecast,
Divisional forecast, Product Line forecast, SKU, SKU by Location. The sales forecasting time
horizon generally coincides with the time frame of the plan for which it was developed i.e.
Annual, 1-5 years, 1- 6 months, Daily, Weekly, Monthly. The sales forecasting time interval
generally coincides with how often the plan is updated, i.e. Daily, Weekly, Monthly, and
Quarterly.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Forecast Accuracy
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.1.6
P1.1
Inputs
Revises Business Assumptions
EP.10, EP.5
Customer Requirements
Revised Aggregate Forecast
and Projections
EP.10
Shipments
D1.11,D1.3
> P1.1
Outputs
Chain Requirements
> Supply
P1.3
Planning Data
EP.3
Order Backlog
D1.11, D1.3, D2.3, D3.3
3.1.7
P1.2
Identify, Prioritize and Aggregate Supply-Chain Resources
The process of identifying, prioritizing, and aggregating, as a whole with constituent parts,
all sources of supply that are required and add value in the supply chain of a product or
service at the appropriate level, horizon and interval.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
3.1.8
P1.2
Inputs
Planning Data
EP.3
Inventory
Delivery Plans
P4.4
Make/Buy Decision
EP.5
Outsource Plan
EP.5, EP.6
Production Plans
P3.4
> P1.2
Outputs
Chain Resources
> Supply
P1.3
Return Regulatory
Requirement
ER.8
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
Revised Capital Plan
EP.5, EP.6
3.1.9
P1.3
Balance Supply Chain Resources with SC Requirements
The process of identifying and measuring the gaps and imbalances between demand and
resources in order to determine how to best resolve the variances through marketing,
pricing, packaging, warehousing, outsource plans or some other action that will optimize
service, flexibility, costs, assets, (or other supply chain inconsistencies) in an iterative and
collaborative environment.
The process of developing a time-phased course of action that commits supply-chain
resources to meet supply-chain requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Fill Rate
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.1.10
P1.3
Inputs
Supply Chain Requirements
P1.1
Supply Chain Performance
Improvement Plan
EP.2
Inventory Strategy
EP.4
> P1.3
Outputs
3.1.11
P1.4
Establish & Communicate Supply-Chain Plans
The establishment and communication of courses of action over the appropriate timedefined (long-term, annual, monthly, weekly) planning horizon and interval, representing a
projected appropriation of supply-chain resources to meet supply-chain requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
None Identified
3.1.12
> P1.4
Outputs
P2
Plan Source
The development and establishment of courses of action over specified time periods
that represent a projected appropriation of material resources to meet supply chain
requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
3.1.13
P2
Production Plans P3.4
Delivery Plans P4.4
Planning Data EP.3
Supply Chain Plans P1.4
Item Master EP.7
Source Return Requirements P5.4
Order Signal D2.3, D3.3
Bill Of Materials EP.7
Product Routings EP.7
! P2.1 !
A
Inventory Availability S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2, M3.3,
D1.8, D4.2
Product Availability
Product On Order S1.1, S2.1, S3.3
Product Inventory Target Levels ES.4
Planning Data EP.3
! P2.2 !
! P2.3
P2.4 !
3.1.14
P2.1
Identify, Prioritize and Aggregate Product Requirements
The process of identifying, prioritizing, and considering, as a whole with constituent parts,
all sources of demand for a product or service in the supply chain.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Forecast Accuracy
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
None identified
None identified
None identified
3.1.15
P2.1
Inputs
Production Plans
P3.4
Delivery Plans
P4.4
Planning Data
EP.3
Supply Chain Plans
P1.4
Item Master
EP.7
> P2.1
Outputs
Requirements
> Product
P2.3
Bill Of Materials
EP.7
Product Routings
EP.7
3.1.16
P2.2
Identify, Assess and Aggregate Product Resources
The process of identifying, evaluating, and considering, as a whole with constituent parts, all
material and other resources used to add value in the supply chain for a product or services.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
Identify recyclable/reusable
materials
None identified
None identified
Minimize packaging
None identified
3.1.17
P2.2
Inputs
Inventory Availability
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.8, D4.2
Product Availability
Product On Order
S1.1, S2.1, S3.3
> P2.2
Outputs
3.1.18
P2.3
Balance Product Resources with Product Requirements
The process of developing a time-phased course of action that commits resources to meet
requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Inputs
Planning Decision Policies
EP.1
Product Requirements
P2.1
> P2.3
Outputs
> None Identified
Product Sources
P2.2
3.1.19
P2.4
Estabilsh Sourcing Plans
The establishment of courses of action over specified time periods that represent a
projected appropriation of supply resources to meet sourcing plan requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
Outputs
Inputs
None Identified
3.1.20
> P2.4
>
Sourcing Plans
P1.2, P3.2, P4.2, P5.1, P5.2, ES.3,
ES.4, S1.1, S2.1, S3.1, S3.3, D1.3,
D2.3, D3.3, DR1.4, DR2.4, DR3.4
P3
Plan Make
The development and establishment of courses of action over specified time periods
that represent a projected appropriation of production resources to meet production
requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.1.21
P3
Planning Data EP.3
Supply Chain Plans P1.4
Order Signal D2.3, D3.3
Delivery Plans P4.4
Item Master EP.7
Bill Of Materials EP.7
Product Routings EP.7
Return Production Requirements P3.1, P5.4
! P3.1 !
A
Equiptment and Facilities Replacement and
Disposition Plans EM.5
Planning Data EP.3
Production Schedule M1.1, M2.1, M2.2. M3.2
Inventory Availability S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2, M3.3,
D1.8, D4.2
Sourcing Plans P2.4
! P3.2 !
! P3.3
P3.4 !
3.1.22
P3.1
Identify, Prioritize and Aggregate Production Requirements
The process of identifying, prioritizing, and considering as a whole with constituent parts, all
sources of demand in the creation of a product or service.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Forcast Accuracy
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Planning Data
EP.3
Supply Chain Plans
P1.4
Order Signal
D2.3, D3.3
Delivery Plans
P4.4
Item Master
EP.7
> P3.1
Outputs
Production
> Return
Requirements
P3.1, P5.4
Bill Of Materials
EP.7
Product Routings
EP.7
Return Production
Requirements
P3.1, P5.4
3.1.23
P3.2
Identify, Assess and Aggregate Production Resources
The process of identifying, evaluating, and considering, as a whole with constituent parts, all
things that add value in the creation of a product or performance of a service.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Inputs
Equiptment and Facilities
Replacement and Disposition
Plans
EM.5
Planning Data
EP.3
Production Schedule
M1.1, M2.1, M2.2. M3.2
> P3.2
Outputs
Resources
> Production
P3.3
Inventory Availability
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.8, D4.2
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
3.1.24
P3.3
Balance Production Resources with Production Requirements
The process of developing a time-phased course of action that commits creation and
operation resources to meet creation and operation requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Balance environmental
requirements
Inputs
Planing Decision Policies
EP.1
Production Resources
P3.2
> P3.3
Outputs
Production Requirements
3.1.25
P3.4
Establish Production Plans
The establishment of courses of action over specified time periods that represent a
projected appropriation of supply resources to meet production and operating plan
requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Outputs
Inputs
None Identified
> P3.4
Production Plans
3.1.26
P4
Plan Deliver
The development and establishment of courses of action over specified time periods that
represent a projected appropriation of delivery resources to meet delivery requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
3.1.27
P4
Product/Category Lifecycle
Store Shelf Inventory Counts D4.4
Planning Data EP.3
DC/Vendor Transit Time
Order Backlog D1.11, D1.3, D2.3, D3.3
Year-to Year for Like SKU/Subclass
Product Routings EP.7
Item Master EP.7
Service Levels EP.1
Markdown Plans
DC/Vender Lead Time
Promotion/Event Plans
Actual Shrink
Point of Sale Data (Daily) D4.6
Merchandise Category/Classification
Supply Chain Plans P1.4
Delivery Return Requirements P5.4
Stock-out History
EOQ/ESQs
! P4.1 !
! P4.2 !
! P4.3
P4.4 !
3.1.28
P4.1
Identify, Prioritize and Aggregate Delivery Requirements
The process of identifying, prioritizing, and considering, as a whole with constituent parts,
all sources of demand in the delivery of a product or service.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Forecast Accuracy
None Identified
Transportation Costs,
Cost to Identify, Prioritize, and Aggregate Delivery
Requirements
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Pilot by Wal-Mart. IT
None identified
None identified
3.1.29
P4.1
Unplanned Orders Are Accepted
and Scheduled Only When There is
No Detrimental Impact on Overall
Product Delivery Plan
Description/Definition cont.
Aggregate requirements
3.1.30
P4.1
Inputs
Product/Category Lifecycle
Store Shelf Inventory Counts
D4.4
Planning Data
EP.3
DC/Vendor Transit Time
Order Backlog
D1.11, D1.3, D2.3, D3.3
Year-to Year for Like SKU/
Subclass
Product Routings
EP.7
Item Master
EP.7
Service Levels
EP.1
Markdown Plans
DC/Vender Lead Time
Outputs
> P4.1
>
Delivery Requirements
P4.3
Item Stocking Requirements
D4.2
Promotion/Event Plans
Actual Shrink
Point of Sale Data (Daily)
D4.6
Merchandise Category/
Classification
Supply Chain Plans
P1.4
Delivery Return Requirements
P5.4
Stock-out History
EOQ/ESQs
3.1.31
P4.2
Identify, Assess and Aggregate Delivery Resources
The process of identifying, evaluating, and considering, as a whole with constituent parts, all
things that add value in the delivery of a product or service.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Forecast Accuracy
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Resource Availability
D3.3
Planning Data
EP.3
Load Information
D1.5, D2.5, D3.5
Productin Plans
P3.4
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
Outputs
> P4.2
Resources and
> Delivery
Capabilities
P4.3
Inventory Availability/Delivery
Date
D1.3, D2.3
Delivery Return Requirements
P5.4
Finish Goods Inventory Target
Levels
SD.4
3.1.32
P4.3
Balance Delivery Resources and Capabilities with Delivery Requirements
The process of developing a time-phased course of action that commits delivery resources
to meet delivery requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Transportation Costs,
Cost to Identify, Assess, and Aggregate Delivery Resources
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Planning Decision Policies
EP.1
Delivery Resources and
Capabilities
P4.2
> P4.3
Inputs
Delivery Requirements
P4.1
3.1.33
P4.4
Establish Delivery Plans
The establishment of courses of action over specified time periods that represent a
projected appropriation of delivery resources to meet delivery requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Distribution Costs,
Cost to Establish Delivery Plans
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
None identified
None identified
Outputs
Inputs
None Identified
> P4.4
>
Delivery Plans
P1.2, P2.1, P3.1, P5.1, P5.2, M1.5,
M2.5, M3.6, D1.3, D2.3, D3.3
Stocking Requirements
D4.1
3.1.34
P5
Plan Return
A strategic or tactical process to establish and adjust courses of action or tasks over
specified time periods that represent a projected appropriation of return resources and
assets to meet anticipated as well as unanticipated return requirements. The scope includes
unplanned returns of sold merchandise as well as planned returns of rotable products that
are refurbished for reissue to customers.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.1.35
P5
Product Routings EP.7
Item Master EP.7
Return Regulatory Requirements ER.8
Sourcing Plans P2.4
Historic Return Rates SR1.3, SR2.3, SR3.3, DR1.1, DR2.1,
DR3.1
Business Rules for Return Processes ES.1, ER.1
Actual Sales History D1.2, D2.2, D3.3
Contractual Obligations
Revised Business Assumptions EP.10, EP.5
Planning Data EP.3
Delivery Plans P4.4
Production Plans P3.4
Supply Chain Plans P1.4
Revised Aggregate Forecast and Projections EP.10
Return Regulatory Requirements ER.8
Regulatory Requirements EP.8
Inventory Strategy EP.4
Return Process Capabilities EP.2
MRO Product Return Capabilities ER.2, ER.5
Production Plans P3.4
Planning Data EP.3
Return Inventory Transfer Data DR1.4, DR2.4, DR3.3,
DR3.4
Outsource Plan EP.5, EP.6
Return Process Workflow Definiton and Policies ER.7
Budget Constraints EP.10
Return Inventory Targets ER.4
Return Transportation Guidelines, Policies and
Agreements
Data About Return Capabilities ER.3
Make/Buy Decision EP.5
Projected Internal and External Capacity EP.5, EP.6
Delivery Plans P4.4
Sourcing Plans P2.4
Business Rules for Return Processes ES.1, ER.1
Revised Capital Plan EP.5, EP.6
! P5.1 !
! P5.2 !
! P5.3
P5.4 !
3.1.36
P5.1
Assess and Aggregate Return Requirements
The process of identifying, evaluating, and considering, as a whole with constituent parts, all
sources of demand for the return of a product.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
3.1.37
P5.1
Inputs
Product Routings
EP.7
Item Master
EP.7
Return Regulatory
Requirements
ER.8
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
Historic Return Rates
SR1.3, SR2.3, SR3.3, DR1.1,
DR2.1, DR3.1
Business Rules for Return
Processes
ES.1, ER.1
Actual Sales History
D1.2, D2.2, D3.3
> P5.1
Outputs
Requirements
> Return
P5.3
Contractual Obligations
Revised Business Assumptions
EP.10, EP.5
Planning Data
EP.3
Delivery Plans
P4.4
Production Plans
P3.4
Supply Chain Plans
P1.4
3.1.38
P5.2
Identify, Assess, and Aggregate Return Resources
The process of identifying, evaluating, and consideration for all resources that add value to,
execute, or constrain the processes for the return of a product.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.1.39
P5.2
Inputs
Return Regulatory Requirements
ER.8
Regulatory Requirements
EP.8
Inventory Strategy
EP.4
Return Process Capabilities
EP.2
MRO Product Return Capabilities
ER.2, ER.5
Production Plans
P3.4
Planning Data
EP.3
Return Inventory Transfer Data
DR1.4, DR2.4, DR3.3, DR3.4
Outsource Plan
EP.5, EP.6
Return Process Workflow
Definiton and Policies
ER.7
Budget Constraints
EP.10
> P5.2
Outputs
Resources
> Return
P5.3
3.1.40
P5.3
Balance Return Resources with Return Requirements
The process of developing courses of action that make feasible the commitment the
appropriate return resources and or assets to satisfy return requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Return Resources
P5.2
Return Requirements
P5.1
Planning Decision Policies
EP.1
> P5.3
Outputs
3.1.41
P5.4
Establish and Communicate Return Plans
The establishment and communication of courses of action over specified time periods
that represent a projected appropriation of required return resources and or assets to meet
return process requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Outputs
Product Return Capabilities
DR1.1, DR2.1, DR3.1
Return Plans
SR1.2, SR2.2, SR3.2,DR1.1. DR2.1,
DR3.1, ER.4, ER.5, ER.6, ER.7
Inputs
None Identified
> P5.4
Process Procedures
ER.1, ER.2, ER.8
Return Requirements
> Deliver
P4.1, P4.2
Source Return Requirements
P2.1
Return Rules and Policies
ER.1
Return Production
Requirements
P3.1
3.1.42
EP
Enable Plan
The collection of processes associated with managing and monitoring Plan process data,
performance and relationships.
Process Categories
EP.1: Manage Business Rules for
Plan Processes
3.1.43
EP
EP.7: Manage Planning
Configuration
3.1.44
EP
Strategic Plan
Service Requirements
Business Plan
EP.1 !
EP.2
EP.3 !
EP.4 !
EP.5 !
!
!
EP.6 !
EP.7
EP.8 !
EP.9 !
Internal Information
Monitoring
Strategic Plan
Business Plan
!EP.10 !
3.1.45
EP.1
Manage Business Rules for Plan Process
The process of establishing, maintaining, and enforcing decision support criteria for Supply
Chain Planning which translate to rules for conducting business, i.e. developing and
maintaining customer and channel performance standards of an entire supply chain such
as service levels, given service requirements by supply chain stakeholders/trading partners.
Business rules align PLAN process policies with business strategy, goals, and objectives.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Outputs
Inputs
Strategic Plan
Service Requirements
Business Plan
3.1.46
> EP.1
Service Levels
P4.1
EP.2
Manage Performance of Supply Chain
The process of measuring actual integrated Supply Chain performance against internal
and/or external standards to develop and implement a course of action to achieve targeted
performance levels. Performance targets established for the execution of supply chain
processes are reflected in the process elements for PLAN, i.e. cost, delivery reliability, cycle
time, responsiveness, and assets.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
None identified
Manage environmental
performance
Inputs
Supply Chain Performance
Metrics
ES.4, EM.2, ED.2, ER.2
Continuous Improvement
Process
Business Plan
Outputs
> EP.2
3.1.47
EP.3
Manage PLAN Data Collection
The process of collecting, integrating and maintaining the accuracy of supply chain
execution information necessary to plan the balance of supply chain resources to demand
requirements at both the highest aggregate and lowest SKU planning levels. Each
occurrence consumes time.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Supply Chain Execution Data
3.1.48
Outputs
> EP.3
Data
> Planning
P1.1, P1.2, P2.1, P2.2, P3.1, P3.2,
P4.1, P4.2, P5.1, P5.2, EM.7
EP.4
Manage Integrated Supply Chain Inventory
The process of establishing total supply chain inventory strategy and planning the
total inventory limits or levels (including Raw Material, Work In Process, Finished and
Purchased Finished Goods) including replenishment models, ownership, product
mix, and stocking locations, both inter and intra company.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Forecast Accuracy
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Product Routings
EP.7
Integrated Supply Chain
Inventory Information
EP.4
Planning Decision Policies
EP.1
Capacity Constraints
Outputs
> EP.4
>
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
3.1.49
EP.5
Manage Integrated Supply Chain Capital Assets
The process of defining capacity strategy (i.e. internal versus contract manufacturing or
internal versus 3rd Party Logistics) and then acquiring, maintaining and dispositioning an
organizations capital assets to operate the integrated supply chain.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Forecast Accuracy
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
Outputs
Revised Business Assumptions
P1.1, P5.1, ED.7
Make/Buy Decision
P1.2, P5.2
Inputs
Product Routings
EP.7
Planning Decision Policies
EP.1
Capacity Constraints
> EP.5
>
3.1.50
EP.6
Manage Integrated Supply Chain Transportation
The process of defining an integrated supply chain transportation strategy and maintaining
the information which characterizes total supply chain transportation requirements, and the
management of transporters both inter and intra company.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Forecast Accuracy
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Considerations emissions in
transportation decisions
None identified
None identified
Outputs
Make/Buy Decision
P1.2, P5.2
Inputs
Product Routings
EP.7
Planning Decision Policies
EP.1
Capacity Constraints
> EP.6
Capital Plan
> Revised
P1.2, P5.2
Outsource Plan
P1.2, P5.2
Transportation Capacity
EM.1, EM.2
3.1.51
EP.7
Manage Planning Configuration
The process of defining and maintaining the information about a unique supply chain
network for a group of similar or complimentary products through their full life cycle,
including the evaluation of market need, product realization (development, introduction
and production), product discontinuation, and after-market support. This element also
includes the management of critical sub processes needed to manage the life cycle of
individual item numbers including item masters, routings, event planning (promotions,
etc.), ABC classification, rationalization, and bill of materials.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Forecast Accuracy
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
None Identified
SKU Rationalization
None identified
ABC Classification
None identified
Outputs
Inputs
None Identified
Item Master
P2.1, P3.1, P4.1, P5.1
> EP.7
Routings
> Product
EP.4, EP.5, EP.6, P2.1, P3.1, P4.1,
P5.1
Bill of Materials
P2.1, P3.1
3.1.52
EP.8
Manage PLAN Regulatory Requirements and Compliance
The process of identifying and complying with regulatory documentation and process
standards set by external entities (i.e. government, trade officials, etc.) when planning for
the integrated supply chain network.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
None Identified
> EP.8
Outputs
Requirements
> Regulatory
P5.2
3.1.53
EP.9
Process Element: Manage Supply Chain Plan Risk
The process of identifying, coordinating and managing Supply Chain Risk(s) by aligning
with the overall business risk management program. Supply Chain Risk is defined as
any uncertainty that can affect the organization in a potentially negative fashion. The
Manage Supply Chain Plan Risk enabler includes identifying the potential risk, assessing
the probability and potential impact of the risk, and planning risk mitigating strategies.
This requires analysis and coordination with the assessment and mitigating activities of
the other process areas (S, M, D, R) as it relates to Supply side, Demand side, Internal, and
External Supply Chain Risks.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.1.54
EP.9
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
3.1.55
EP.9
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Inputs
Internal Information
Monitoring
3.1.56
Outputs
> EP.9
EP.10
Align Supply Chain Unit Plan with Financial Plan
The process of revising the long-term supply chain capacity and resource plans, given the
inputs from the strategic and business plans. This includes revision of not only aggregate
forecast and projections related to supply chain, source, make, and delivery plans, but also
business assumptions.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
Outputs
Inputs
Strategic Plan
Business Plan
> EP.10
Aggregate Forecast
> Revised
and Projections
P1.1, P5.1
Budget Constraints
P5.2
3.1.57
3.1.58
S
Source
The processes associated with ordering, delivery, receipt and transfer of raw material items,
subassemblies, product and/or services.
Process Categories
S1: Source Stocked Product
3.2.1
S1
Source Stocked Product
The process of ordering, receiving and transferring raw material items, sub-assemblies,
product and or services based on aggregated demand requirements. The intention of
Source-to-Stock is to maintain a pre-determined level of inventory for these materials, subassemblies or products. No customer reference or customer order detail is exchanged with
the supplier, attached to or marked on the product, or recorded in the warehousing or ERP
system for Source-to-Stock products. Examples of alternative or related names for Sourceto-Stock are: replenishment inventory, drip parts, kan-ban, andon, and bulk or generic stock.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Cost to Source,
Product Acquisition Costs
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.2.2
S1
Sourcing Plans P2.4
Replenishment Signal M1.2, M2.2, M3.3, D1.3, D2.3,
D3.3
Return Inventory Transfer Data DR1.4, DR2.4, DR3.3,
DR3.4
Supplier Performance ES.2
Logistics Selection ES.6
Production Schedule M1.1, M2.1, M2.2, M3.2
! S1.1 !
! S1.2 !
Receipt Verification
S1.2, S1.3, S2.2, S2.3, S3.4, S3.5
! S1.3 !
Receipt Verification
S1.2, S1.3, S2.2, S2.3, S3.4, S3.5
! S1.4 !
! S1.5
3.2.3
S1.1
Schedule Product Deliveries
Scheduling and managing the execution of the individual deliveries of product against an
existing contract or purchase order. The requirements for product releases are determined
based on the detailed sourcing plan or other types of product pull signals.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Bundle deliveries
3.2.4
S1.1
Inputs
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
Replenishment Signal
M1.2, M2.2, M3.3, D1.3, D2.3,
D3.3
Outputs
> S1.1
Product On Order
P2.2, ES.10
Supplier Performance
ES.2
Logistics Selection
ES.6
Production Schedule
M1.1, M2.1, M2.2, M3.2
3.2.5
S1.2
Receive Product
The process and associated activities of receiving product to contract requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
t
t
t
t
Carrier Agreement
3.2.6
S1.2
Inputs
MRO Products
DR2.4
Product
D1.13, D2.13, D3.13
Defective Products
DR1.4
> S1.2
Outputs
Verification
> Receipt
ES.1, ES.2, ES.6, ES.8,S1.3, S1.4,
S2.3, S2.4, S3.5, S3.6
Scheduled Receipts
S1.1, S2.1, S3.3
Excess Products
DR3.4
3.2.7
S1.3
Verify Product
The process and actions required determining product conformance to requirements and
criteria.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
t
t
t
t
Inputs
Receipt Verification
S1.2, S1.3, S2.2, S2.3, S3.4, S3.5
3.2.8
> S1.3
Outputs
S1.4
Transfer Product
The transfer of accepted product to the appropriate stocking location within the supply
chain. This includes all of the activities associated with repackaging, staging, transferring
and stocking product. For service this is the transfer or application of service to the final
customer or end user.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
Energy Costs,
Cost to Transfer Product,
Product Packaging costs,
% of vehicle fuel derived from alternative fuels,
Packaging purchases,
Quantity per shipment
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
3.2.9
S1.4
Outputs
Inputs
3.2.10
> S1.4
Transferred Product
S1.5, S2.5, S3.7
S1.5
Authorize Supplier Payment
The process of authorizing payments and paying suppliers for product or services. This
process includes invoice collection, invoice matching and the issuance of checks.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Pay on Receipt
Inputs
Transferred Product
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6
Payment Terms
ES.10
> S1.5
Outputs
> None Identified
3.2.11
S2
Source Make-to-Order Product
The processes of ordering and receiving product or material that is ordered (and may be
configured) only when required by a specific customer order. The intention of Source-toOrder is to maintain inventory ordered (and/or configured) specifically for customer orders
only. The product is ordered, received and identified in stock using this customer order
reference (order designated inventory). The product is typically identifiable throughout
the sourcing process, by the reference to the customer order attached to or marked on
the product or packaging and in the warehouse management or ERP system. Examples of
alternative or related names for Source-to-Order are: purchase-to-order, special ordering
(retail industry), kitting and line sequencing (manufacturing industries).
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
3.2.12
S2
Replenishment Signal M1.2, M2.2, M3.3, D1.3, D2.3,
D3.3
Production Schedule M1.1, M2.1, M2.2, M3.2
Return Inventory Transfer Data DR1.4, DR2.4, DR3.3,
DR3.4
Source Execution Data M2.2
Sourcing Plans P2.4
Logistics Selection ES.6
Supplier Performance ES.2
! S2.1 !
! S2.2 !
! S2.3 !
! S2.4 !
! S2.5
3.2.13
S2.1
Schedule Product Deliveries
Scheduling and managing the execution of the individual deliveries of product against the
contract. The requirements for product deliveries are determined based on the detailed
sourcing plan. This includes all aspects of managing the contract schedule including
prototypes, qualifications or service deployment.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Bundle deliveries
3.2.14
S2.1
Inputs
Replenishment Signal
M1.2, M2.2, M3.3, D1.3, D2.3,
D3.3
Production Schedule
M1.1, M2.1, M2.2, M3.2
Return Inventory Transfer Data
DR1.4, DR2.4, DR3.3, DR3.4
Source Execution Data
M2.2
Outputs
> S2.1
Product On Order
P2.2, ES.10
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
Logistics Selection
ES.6
Supplier Performance
ES.2
3.2.15
S2.2
Process Element: Receive Product
The process and associated activities of receiving product to contract requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
t
t
t
t
None identified
3.2.16
S2.2
Inputs
Defective Products
DR1.4
Excess Products
DR3.4
MRO Products
DR2.4
> S2.2
Outputs
Verification
> Receipt
ES.1, ES.2, ES.6, ES.8, S1.3, S1.4,
S2.3, S2.4, S3.5, S3.6, ED.8
Product
D1.13, D2.13, D3.13
3.2.17
S2.3
Verify Product
The process and actions required determining product conformance to requirements and
criteria.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
t
t
t
t
Inputs
Receipt Verification
S1.2, S1.3, S2.2, S2.3, S3.4, S3.5
3.2.18
> S2.3
Outputs
Verification
> Receipt
S1.2, S1.3, S2.2, S2.3, S3.4, S3.5
S2.4
Transfer Product
The transfer of accepted product to the appropriate stocking location within the supply
chain. This includes all of the activities associated with repackaging, staging, transferring,
and stocking product and or application of service.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
Energy Costs,
Cost to Transfer Product
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Inputs
Finished Goods Inventory
Location
ED.4
WIP Inventory Location
EM.6
Replenishment Signal
M1.2, M2.2, M3.3, D1.3, D2.3, D3.3
Product Inventory Location
ES.4
Receipt Verification
S1.2, S1.3, S2.2, S2.3, S3.4, S3.5
Outputs
> S2.4
Inventory Availability
P2.2, P3.2, ES.4, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.3, D1.8, D1.9, D2.3,
D2.9, D3.9, D4.2, D4.3
3.2.19
S2.5
Authorize Supplier Payment
The process of authorizing payments and paying suppliers for product or services. This
process includes invoice collection, invoice matching and the issuance of checks.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Pay on Receipt
Inputs
Transferred Product
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6
Payment Terms
ES.10
3.2.20
> S2.5
Outputs
S3
Source Engineerto-Order Product
The processes of identifying and selecting sources of supply, negotiating, validating,
scheduling, ordering and receiving parts, assemblies or specialized products or services that
are designed, ordered and/or built based on the requirements or specifications of a specific
customer order.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Cost to Source,
Product Acquisition Costs
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.2.21
S3
Business Rules for Source Processes ES.1
Sourcing Plans P2.4
Supplier Data ES.7
Current Inventory Source Data ES.3
ETO Spec or Design
! S3.1 !
! S3.2 !
! S3.3 !
! S3.4 !
! S3.5 !
! S3.6 !
! S3.7
3.2.22
S3.1
Identify Sources of Supply
The identification and qualification of potential suppliers capable of designing and
delivering product that will meet all of the required product specifications.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
None identified
None identified
None identified
3.2.23
S3.1
Inputs
Business Rules for Source
Processes
ES.1
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
Supplier Data
ES.7
> S3.1
3.2.24
S3.2
Select Final Supplier (s) and Negotiate
The identification of the final supplier(s) based on the evaluation of RFQs, supplier
qualifications and the generation of a contract defining the costs and terms and conditions
of product availability.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
ERP
None identified
None identified
3.2.25
S3.2
Inputs
Business Rules for Source
Processes
ES.1
Supplier Data
ES.7
Current Inventory Source Data
ES.3
> S3.2
Outputs
ETO Proposal
3.2.26
S3.3
Schedule Product Deliveries
Scheduling and managing the execution of the individual deliveries of product against the
contract. The requirements for product deliveries are determined based on the detailed
sourcing plan. This includes all aspects of managing the contract schedule including
prototypes and qualifications.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Bundle deliveries
3.2.27
S3.3
Inputs
Logistics Selection
ES.6
Replenishment Signal
M1.2, M2.2, M3.3, D1.3, D2.3,
D3.3
Supplier Agreement
ES.10, S3.2
Return Inventory Transfer Data
DR1.4, DR2.4, DR3.3, DR3.4
Supplier Performance
ES.2
Outputs
Procurement Signal (Supplier)
> S3.3
>
Scheduled Receipts
S1.2, S3.4, M1.1, M2.1, M3.2,
D1.8, D4.2
Product On Order
P2.2, ES.10
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
Production Schedule
M1.1, M2.1, M2.2, M3.2
3.2.28
S3.4
Receive Product
The process and associated activities of receiving product to contract requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
t
t
t
t
None identified
Carrier Agreement
3.2.29
S3.4
Inputs
Product
D1.13, D2.13, D3.13
Scheduled Receipts
S1.1, S2.1, S3.3
3.2.30
Outputs
> S3.4
Receipt Verification
S3.5
Verify Product
The process and actions required determining product conformance to requirements and
criteria.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
t
t
t
t
Inputs
Receipt Verification
S1.2, S1.3, S2.2, S2.3, S3.4, S3.5
> S3.5
Outputs
3.2.31
S3.6
Transfer Product
The transfer of accepted product to the appropriate stocking location within the supply
chain. This includes all of the activities associated with repackaging, staging, transferring,
and stocking product.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Inputs
Product Inventory Location
ES.4
Replenishment Signal
M1.2, M2.2, M3.3, D1.3, D2.3,
D3.3
Finished Goods Inventory
Location
ED.4
WIP Inventory Location
EM.6
Outputs
> S3.6
>
Inventory Availability
P2.2, P3.2, ES.4, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.3, D1.8, D1.9, D2.3,
D2.9, D3.9, D4.2, D4.3
Existing Inventory Data
ES.4
Transferred Product
S1.5, S2.5, S3.7
Receipt Verification
S1.2, S1.3,. S2.2, S2.3, S3.4, S3.5
3.2.32
S3.7
Authorize Supplier Payment
The process of authorizing payments and paying suppliers for product or services. This
process includes invoice collection, invoice matching and the issuance of checks.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Pay on Receipt
Inputs
Transferred Product
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6
Payment Terms
ES.10
> S3.7
Outputs
3.2.33
ES
Enable Source
The collection of processes associated with managing and monitoring Source process data,
performance and relationships.
Process Categories
ES.1: Manage Sourcing Business
Rules
3.2.34
ES
ES.7: Manage Supplier Network
3.2.35
ES
Business Rules for Return Processes P5.1, P5.2, ES.7,
SR1.1, SR2.1, SR3.1,DR1.1, DR2.1, DR3.1, ER.4, ER.5, ER.7,
ER.8
Business Rules for Source Processes ES.4, S3.1, S3.2
ES.1
ES.2 !
ES.3 !
ES.4
ES.5 !
ES.6 !
ES.7 !
ES.8 !
Monitoring
Internal Information
ES.9 !
! ES.10 !
3.2.36
Internal Adjustments
Risk Management Programs for Process Area
ES.1
Manage Sourcing Business Rules
The process of defining requirements and establishing, maintaining and enforcing decision
support criteria, in alignment with business strategy, goals and objectives. The business
strategy defines the criteria for sourcing business rules that are translated into guidelines
and policies for conducting business within the enterprise and other legal entities. Sourcing
business rules include: supplier selection and negotiation processes, fulfillment and delivery
performance and relationship definition for specific levels of collaboration and partnership.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Collaborative environmental
management processes
None identified
Outputs
Inputs
Supplier Data
ES.7
Receipt Verification
S1.2, S1.3,. S2.2, S2.3, S3.4, S3.5
> ES.1
>
3.2.37
ES.2
Assess Supplier Performance
The process of measuring actual supplier performance against internal and/or external
standards, providing feedback to achieve and maintain the performance required to meet
the customers business and/or competitive needs.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
3.2.38
ES.2
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Carrier Agreement
Inputs
Supplier Data
ES.7
Receipt Verification
S1.2, S1.3,. S2.2, S2.3, S3.4, S3.5
Outputs
> ES.2
>
3.2.39
ES.3
Maintain Source Data
The process of collecting, sorting, defining hierarchy and managing configuration control
of supplier information and source data that are required to make sourcing and related
planning and manufacturing decisions. Source data to be maintained includes supplier
profile data, financials, quality and delivery performance, spend analysis at various levels of
the enterprise, from major business units to material part number
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Inputs
Supplier Data
ES.7
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
Quality & Delivery Peformance
3.2.40
Outputs
> ES.3
ES.4
Manage Product Inventory
The process of establishing and maintaining physical inventories and inventory information.
This includes warehouse management, cycle counting, physical inventories and inventory
reconciliation. For Services, this may include tracking the number of service providers and
the financial resources committed at any given point in time.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.2.41
ES.4
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Energy-efficient buildings
Reusable pallets
Inputs
Outputs
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
> ES.4
3.2.42
ES.5
Manage Capital Assets
The process of acquiring, maintaining and dispositioning an organizations <capital assets>
located at a suppliers facility and/or outside source, which are used to operate the supply
chain.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Changeover Reduction /
Continuous Improvement Program
Inputs
Parts and Services Consumed
EM.5
Supplier Agreement
ES.10, S3.2
> ES.5
Outputs
Assets
> Capital
ES.8
Import/Export Requirements
ES.8
3.2.43
ES.6
Manage Incoming Product
The process of defining and maintaining the information that characterizes inbound
logistics management of all supplier deliveries, including both physical and electronic
goods and services. This includes carrier selection and management, tracking deliveries and
import.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Pooling
Measurement of Carrier
Performance for On-time Delivery
and Completeness
3.2.44
ES.6
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Inputs
Import/Export Requirements
ES.8
Contact Carrier Rates
ES.8
> ES.6
Outputs
> Logistics Selection
S1.1, S2.1, S3.3
Receipt Verification
S1.2, S1.3, S2.2, S2.3, S3.4, S3.5
3.2.45
ES.7
Manage Supplier Network
The process of defining and maintaining a unique network of suppliers to deliver a specific
product set. This includes establishment of a new supplier or maintaining an existing
supplier and all the tasks and activities associated with identifying and qualifying the
supplier and finalizing on the sourcing terms and conditions. Also, the management of a
supplier certification process, which includes certifying new suppliers and maintaining the
current status of existing suppliers.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.2.46
ES.7
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Internet Exchanges
None identified
None identified
3.2.47
ES.7
Inputs
Business Rules for Return
Processes
ES.1, ER.1
Current Inventory Source Data
ES.3
Supplier Agreement
ES.10, S3.2
> ES.7
Outputs
Data
> Supplier
ES.1, ES.10, ES.2, ES.3, S3.1, S3.2
Supplier Performance
ES.2
3.2.48
ES.8
Manage Import/ Export Requirements (Source)
The process of identifying and complying with import/export regulatory documentation
and process standards set by external entities (eg, government).
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Assessing Export/Import
Requirements during Time of
Product Development/Manufacture
Inputs
Parts and Services Consumed
EM.5
Capital Assets
ES.5
Receipt Verification
S1.2, S1.3, S2.2, S2.3, S3.4, S3.5
> ES.8
Outputs
Carrier Rates
> Contract
ES.6, ED.6
Import/Export Requirements
ES.5, ES.6, ES.10
3.2.49
ES.9
Manage Supply Chain Source Risk
The process of managing Source risks within an overall Supply Chain Risk Program. This
includes identifying and assessing Source risks as well as planning and implementing
responses to Source risks. Source risks include potential events that could impact the
organizations or the supplierss ability to deliver raw material in a timely manner at a
reasonable cost with acceptable quality. Risk Management includes: migration, either
reduicing the impact of a risk event of reducing the likelihood of its occurrence.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.2.50
ES.9
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
3.2.51
ES.9
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Sourcing Opportunities
Prioritization to Improve Cost &
Security of Supply
Inputs
Monitoring
Internal Information
3.2.52
Outputs
> ES.9
Adjustments
> Internal
Risk Management Programs
for Process Area
ES.10
Manage Supplier Agreements
The management of existing purchase orders or supplier contracts. This includes managing
volume/step pricing, resolving issues, enforcing terms and conditions and maintaining an
accurate status for existing purchase orders or contracts.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Carrier Agreement
Inputs
Supplier Agreement
ES.10, S3.2
Supplier Data
ES.7
Product On Order
S1.1, S2.1, S3.3
Outputs
> ES.10
Payment Terms
S1.5, S2.5, S3.7
Import/Export Requirements
ES.8
3.2.53
3.2.54
M
Make
The process of adding value to products through mixing, separating, forming, machining,
and chemical processes.
Process Categories
M1: Make-to-Stock
M2: Make-to-Order
M3: Engineer-to-Order
Enable Make
3.3.1
M1
Make-to-Stock
The process of manufacturing in a make-to-stock environment adds value to products
through mixing, separating, forming, machining, and chemical processes. Make to stock
products are intended to be shipped from finished goods or off the shelf, can be completed
prior to receipt of a customer order, and are generally produced to a planned schedule
in accordance with a sales forecast. No customer reference or customer order detail or
specification is attached to production orders, attached to or marked on the product, or
recorded in the shop floor management or ERP system for Make-to-Stock products.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Yield
Cost to Make,
Cost of Goods Sold
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Capacity planning
3.3.2
M1
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Cellular Manufacturing
Lean Manufacturing
Demand-Pull Manufacturing,
Including Active Reduction of
Manufacturing Systems Time and
WIP Through the Use of DemandPull Mechanisms and Visual Controls
Postponement
3.3.3
M1
Scheduled Receipts S1.1, S2.1, S3.3
Information Feedback M1.2, M1.3, M1.4, M1.5, M1.6,
M2.2, M2.3, M2.4, M2.5, M2.6, M3.3, M3.4, M3.5, M3.6,
M3.7,
Equipment and Facilities Schedules and Plans EM.5
Production Plans P3.4
Preventative Maintenance and Calibration
Schedule EM.5
! M1.1 !
! M1.2 !
M1.3 !
M1.4 !
! M1.5 !
M1.6 !
3.3.4
! M1.7
Copyright 2008 Supply Chain Council Inc.
M1.1
Schedule Production Activities
Given plans for the production of specific parts, products, or formulations in specified
quantities and planned availability of required sourced products, the scheduling of
the operations to be performed in accordance with these plans. Scheduling includes
sequencing, and, depending on the factory layout, any standards for setup and run. In
general, intermediate production activities are coordinated prior to the scheduling of the
operations to be performed in producing a finished product.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Schedule Achievement
None Identified
Capacity Utilization
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Cross Training/Certification
HR/certification support
Drum-Buffer-Rope Scheduling
Technique
3.3.5
M1.1
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Demand-Pull Manufacturing,
Including Active Reduction of
Manufacturing Systems Time and
WIP Through the Use of DemandPull Mechanisms and Visual
Controls
Inputs
Scheduled Receipts
S1.1, S2.1, S3.3
Information Feedback
M1.2, M1.3, M1.4, M1.5, M1.6,
M2.2, M2.3, M2.4, M2.5, M2.6,
M3.3, M3.4, M3.5, M3.6, M3.7,
Equipment and Facilities
Schedules and Plans
EM.5
Outputs
> M1.1
Production Schedule
Production Plans
P3.4
Preventative Maintenance and
Calibration Schedule
EM.5
3.3.6
M1.2
Issue Material
The selection and physical movement of sourced/in-process product (e.g., raw materials,
fabricated components, subassemblies, required ingredients or intermediate formulations)
from a stocking location (e.g., stockroom, a location on the production floor, a supplier)
to a specific point of use location. Issuing product includes the corresponding system
transaction. The Bill of Materials/routing information or recipe/production instructions will
determine the products to be issued to support the production operation(s).
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
3.3.7
M1.2
Inputs
Outputs
Inventory Availability
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.8, D4.2
Production Schedule
M1.1, M2.1, M2.2, M3.2
WIP Location Rules
EM.6
WIP Handling Rules, Move
Information and Methods
EM.4
3.3.8
Information Feedback
M1.1, M2.1, M3.2
> M1.2
>
Inventory Availability
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.8, D4.2
Product Location Information
EM.6
Replenishment Signal
S1.1, S1.4, S2.1, S2.4, S3.3, S3.6
M1.3
Produce and Test
The series of activities performed upon sourced/in-process product to convert it from
the raw or semi-finished state to a state of completion and greater value. The processes
associated with the validation of product performance to ensure conformance to defined
specifications and requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Warranty Costs,
Yield Variability,
Warranty and Returns,
Fill Rate,
Yield
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Implement an EMS
Implement an EMS
None identified
3.3.9
M1.3
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Benchmark practices
Demand-pull mechanisms
Inputs
None Identified
3.3.10
> M1.3
Outputs
Feedback
> Information
M1.1, M2.1, M3.2
M1.4
Package
The series of activities that containerize completed products for storage or sale to end-users.
Within certain industries, packaging may include cleaning or sterilization.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Warranty Costs,
Warranty and Returns
Asset Turns,
Package Cycle Time
None Identified
Capacity Utilization
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Bulk Packaging
3.3.11
M1.4
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Design/Upgrade Production
Equipment to Maximize Flexibility
and Avoid Line Stoppages
None identified
Inputs
None Identified
3.3.12
> M1.4
Outputs
M1.5
Stage Product
The movement of packaged products into a temporary holding location to await movement
to a finished goods location. Products that are made to order may remain in the holding
location to await shipment per the associated customer order. The movement to finished
goods is part of the Deliver process.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Production Plans
P3.4
Delivery Plans
P4.4
> M1.5
Outputs
3.3.13
M1.6
Release Product to Deliver
Activities associated with post-production documentation, testing, or certification required
prior to delivery of finished product to customer. Examples include assembly of batch
records for regulatory agencies, laboratory tests for potency or purity, creating certificate of
analysis, and sign-off by the quality organization.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Ensure environmental
documentation
Automated Notification of
Laboratory Regarding Sample
Availability
Implement an EMS
Implement an EMS
Outputs
Inputs
None Identified
3.3.14
> M1.6
>
Information Feedback
M1.1, M2.1, M3.2
Finished Product Release
D1.8, D2.9, D3.9, D4.2
M1.7
Waste Disposal
Activities associated with collecting and managing waste produced during the produce and
test process including scrap material and non-conforming product.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Waste Produced
M1.3
> M1.7
Outputs
3.3.15
M2
Make-to-Order
The process of manufacturing in a make-to-order environment adds value to products
through mixing, separating, forming, machining, and chemical processes for a specific
customer order. Products are completed, built or configured only in response to a customer
order, the customer order reference is attached to the production order, attached to or
marked on the product upon completion of the make process and referenced when
transferring the product to Deliver. The product is identifiable throughout the Make process,
as made for a specific customer order. Examples of alternative or related names for Maketo-Order are: Build-to-Order (BTO), Assemble-to-Order (ATO), Configure-to-Order (CTO), and
postponement.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Yield,
Perfect Order Fulfillment
Energy Costs,
Cost of Goods Sold,
Cost to Make
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Postponement
3.3.16
M2
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
None identified
Capacity planning
3.3.17
M2
Production Plans P3.4
Equipment and Facilities Schedules and Plans EM.5
Preventative Maintenance and Calibration
Schedule EM.5
Information Feedback M1.2, M1.3, M1.4, M1.5, M1.6,
M2.2, M2.3, M2.4, M2.5, M2.6, M3.3, M3.4, M3.5, M3.6,
M3.7
Scheduled Receipts S1.1, S2.1, S3.3
! M2.1 !
! M2.2 !
M2.3 !
M2.4 !
! M2.5 !
M2.6 !
3.3.18
! M2.7
Copyright 2008 Supply Chain Council Inc.
M2.1
Schedule Production Activities
Given plans for the production of specific parts, products, or formulations in specific
quantities and planned availability of required sourced products, the scheduling of
the operations to be preformed in accordance with these plans. Scheduling includes
sequencing, and, depending on the factory layout, any standards for setup and run. In
general intermediate production activities are coordinated prior to the scheduling of the
operations to be preformed in producing a finished product.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Schedule Achievement
None Identified
Capacity Utilization
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Cross Training/Certification
HR/certification support
Demand-Pull Manufacturing,
Including Active Reduction of
Manufacturing Systems Time and
WIP Through the Use of DemandPull Mechanisms and Visual Controls
Drum-Buffer-Rope Scheduling
Technique
3.3.19
M2.1
Inputs
Production Plans
P3.4
Equipment and Facilities
Schedules and Plans
EM.5
Preventative Maintenance and
Calibration Schedule
EM.5
Outputs
> M2.1
Schedule
> Production
P3.2, S1.1, S2.1, S3.3, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.3, D1.8, D2.3, D2.9,
D3.3, D3.9, D4.2
Information Feedback
M1.2, M1.3, M1.4, M1.5, M1.6,
M2.2, M2.3, M2.4, M2.5, M2.6,
M3.3, M3.4, M3.5, M3.6, M3.7
Scheduled Receipts
S1.1, S2.1, S3.3
3.3.20
M2.2
Issue Sourced/ In-Process Product
The selection and physical movement of sourced/in-process products (e.g., raw materials,
fabricated components, subassemblies, required ingredients or intermediate formulations)
from a stocking location (e.g., stockroom, a location on the production floor, a supplier)
to a specific point of use location. Issuing product includes the corresponding system
transaction. The Bill of Materials/routing information or recipe/production instructions will
determine the products to be issued to support the production operation(s).
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
3.3.21
M2.2
Outputs
Production Schedule
M1.1, M2.1, M2.2, M3.2
Inputs
WIP Handling Rules, Move
Information and Methods
EM.4
Inventory Availability
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.8, D4.2
> M2.2
Inventory Availability
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2,
M2.2, M3.3, D1.8, D4.2
Signal
> Replenishment
S1.1, S1.4, S2.1, S2.4, S3.3, S3.6
Production Schedule
M1.1, M2.1, M2.2, M3.2
3.3.22
M2.3
Produce and Test
The series of activities performed upon sourced/in-process product to convert it from
the raw or semi-finished state to a state of completion and greater value. The processes
associated with the validation of product performance to ensure conformance to defined
specifications and requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Warranty Costs,
Yield,
Yield Variability
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Design/Upgrade Production
Equipment to Maximize Flexibility
and Avoid Line Stoppages
Benchmark practices
3.3.23
M2.3
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
None identified
Electronic data collection of employee actions and sourced/inprocess product lot used
Demand-pull mechanisms
Implement an EMS
Implement an EMS
Inputs
None Identified
3.3.24
> M2.3
Outputs
Feedback
> Information
M1.1, M2.1, M3.2
M2.4
Package
The series of activities that containerize completed products for storage or sale to end-users.
Within certain industries, packaging may include cleaning or sterilization.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Warranty Costs
Asset Turns,
Package Cycle Time
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Bulk Packaging
3.3.25
M2.4
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
None identified
Inputs
None Identified
3.3.26
> M2.4
Outputs
M2.5
Stage Finished Product
The movement of packaged products into a temporary holding location to await movement
to a finished goods location. Products that are made to order may remain in the holding
location to await shipment per the associated customer order. The actual move transaction
is part of the Deliver process.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Production Plans
P3.4
Delivery Plans
P4.4
> M2.5
Outputs
Feedback
> Information
M1.1, M2.1, M3.2
3.3.27
M2.6
Release Finished Product to Deliver
Activities associated with post-production documentation, testing, or certification required
prior to delivery of finished product to customer. Examples include assembly of batch
records for regulatory agencies, laboratory tests for potency or purity, creating certificate of
analysis, and sign-off by the quality organization.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Automated Notification of
Laboratory Regarding Sample
Availability
Implement an EMS
Implement an EMS
Outputs
Inputs
None Identified
3.3.28
> M2.6
>
M2.7
Waste Disposal
Activities associated with collecting and managing waste produced during the produce and
test process including scrap material and non-conforming product.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Reliability
Responsiveness
Agility
Costs
Asset
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Waste Produced- From M2.3
Inputs
Waste Produced
M2.3
> M2.7
Outputs
3.3.29
M3
Engineer-to-Order
The process of developing, designing, validating, and ultimately using a manufacturing
process to produce products or services based on the requirements of a specific customer.
In general Engineer-to-Order requires that work instructions may need to be defined or
refined and material routing instructions may need to be added or modified. An example of
an alternative or related name for Make Engineer-to-Order is: Design-to-Order (DTO).
Performance Attributes
Metric
Yield
Cost to Make,
Cost of Goods Sold
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Cellular Manufacturing
Demand-Pull Manufacturing,
Including Active Reduction of
Manufacturing Systems Time and
WIP Through the Use of DemandPull Mechanisms and Visual
Controls
3.3.30
M3
Order Information D3.3
Engineering Design
! M3.1 !
! M3.2 !
! M3.3 !
M3.4 !
M3.5 !
Delivery Plans P4.4
Production Plans P3.4
! M3.6 !
M3.7 !
! M3.8
3.3.31
M3.1
Finalize Production Engineering
Engineering activities required after acceptance of order, but before product can
be produced. May include generation and delivery of final drawings, specifications,
formulas, part programs, etc. In general, the last step in the completion of any preliminary
engineering work done as part of the quotation process.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Automated Conversion of
Engineering Drawings into Product
Specifications
None identified
Automated Configuration
Management
Configuration
Inputs
Order Information
D3.3
Engineering Design
3.3.32
> M3.1
Outputs
Procedures,
> Methods,
Processes
M3.2
M3.2
Schedule Production Activities
Given plans for the production of specific parts, products, or formulations in specified
quantities and planned availability of required sourced products, the scheduling of
the operations to be performed in accordance with these plans. Scheduling includes
sequencing, and, depending on the factory layout, any standards for setup and run. In
general, intermediate production activities are coordinated prior to the scheduling of the
operations to be performed in producing a finished product.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Schedule Achievement
None Identified
Capacity Utilization
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Design/Upgrade Production
Equipment to Maximize Flexibility
and Avoid Line Stoppages
Drum-Buffer-Rope Scheduling
Technique
None identified
Cellular Manufacturing
Description/Definition cont.
3.3.33
M3.2
Build Subassemblies to Forecast
at Highest Generic Level in Bill
of Material; Maintain Flexibility
While Minimizing Cycle Time and
Inventory Position
None identified
Cross Training/Certification
HR/certification support
Inputs
Preventative Maintenance and
Calibration Schedule
EM.5
Scheduled Receipts
S1.1, S2.1, S3.3
Information Feedback
M1.2, M1.3, M1.4, M1.5, M1.6,
M2.2, M2.3, M2.4, M2.5, M2.6,
M3.3, M3.4, M3.5, M3.6, M3.7
Outputs
> M3.2
>
Production Schedule
P3.2, S1.1, S2.1, S3.3, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.3, D1.8, D2.3, D2.9,
D3.3, D3.9, D4.2
Methods, Procedures,
Processes
M3.1
Equipment and Facilities
Schedules and Plans
EM.5
Production Plans
P3.4
3.3.34
M3.3
Issue Sourced/ In-Process Product
The selection and physical movement of sourced/in-process products (e.g., raw materials,
fabricated components, subassemblies, required ingredients or intermediate formulations)
from a stocking location (e.g., stockroom, a location on the production floor, a supplier)
to a specific point of use location. Issuing material includes the corresponding system
transaction. The Bill of Materials/routing information or recipe/production instructions will
determine the materials to be issued to support the production operation(s).
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
3.3.35
M3.3
Inputs
Outputs
3.3.36
Information Feedback
M1.1, M2.1, M3.2
> M3.3
M3.4
Produce and Test
The series of activities performed upon sourced/in-process product to convert it from
the raw or semi-finished state to a state of completion and greater value. The processes
associated with the validation of product performance to ensure conformance to defined
specifications and requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Yield Variability,
Yield,
Warranty Costs
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None Identified
Design/Upgrade Production
Equipment to Maximize Flexibility
and Avoid Line Stoppages
None identified
3.3.37
M3.4
Real Time quality control
techniques
Description/Definition cont.
None identified
Demand-pull mechanisms
Benchmark practices
Implement an EMS
Implement an EMS
Electronic data collection of employee actions and sourced/inprocess product lot used
Inputs
None Identified
3.3.38
> M3.4
Outputs
Feedback
> Information
M1.1, M2.1, M3.2
M3.5
Package
The series of activities that containerize completed products for storage or sale to end-users.
Within certain industries, packaging may include cleaning or sterilization.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Warranty Costs
None Identified
Capacity Utilization
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Bulk Packaging
Design/Upgrade Production
Equipment to Maximize Flexibility
and Avoid Line Stoppages
None identified
3.3.39
M3.5
Up-to-Date Shop Packet/
Specifications
Description/Definition cont.
Inputs
None Identified
3.3.40
> M3.5
Outputs
M3.6
Stage Finished Product
The movement of packaged products into a temporary holding location to await movement
to a finished goods location. Products that are made to order may remain in the holding
location to await shipment per the associated customer order. The actual move transaction
is part of the Deliver process.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Delivery Plans
P4.4
Production Plans
P3.4
> M3.6
Outputs
Feedback
> Information
M1.1, M2.1, M3.2
3.3.41
M3.7
Release Product to Deliver
Activities associated with post-production documentation, testing, or certification required
prior to delivery of finished product to customer. Examples include assembly of batch
records for regulatory agencies, laboratory tests for potency or purity, creating certificate of
analysis, and sign-off by the quality organization.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Implement an EMS
Implement an EMS
Automated Notification of
Laboratory Regarding Sample
Availability
Outputs
Inputs
None Identified
3.3.42
> M3.7
>
M3.8
Waste Disposal
Activities associated with collecting and managing waste produced during the produce and
test process including scrap material and non-conforming product.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Waste Produced
M3.4
> M3.8
Outputs
3.3.43
EM
EM: Enable Make
The collection of processes associated with managing and monitoring Make process data,
performance and relationships.
Process Categories
EM.1: Manage Production Rules
The process of identifying and maintaining a network of intracompany production units that deliver specific semi-finished
materials or product sets to the final production site.
3.3.44
EM
Business Plan
Transportation Capacity EP.6
Corporate Objectives and Strategies
Production Plans P3.4
Inventory Capacity
Production Capacity EP.5
Product Design
! EM.1 !
Production Rules
Business Plan
Transportation Capacity EP.6
Corporate Objectives and Strategies
Production Plans P3.4
Inventory Capacity
Production Capacity EP.5
Product Design/Quality
! EM.2 !
Production Rules
Production Quality & Policies
Supply Chain Performance Metrics EP.2, ED.1, ED.5
Systems Capabilities
Information Needed to Create and Maintain IT
Information from Business Processes
Information Needs Analysis
! EM.3 !
Capacity Requirements
Production Orders Planned & Actual Reports
Returned Product Information
Incoming Product Information
! EM.4 !
Budgets
Manufacturers Recommended Maintenance
Schedules & Specifications
Equipment and Facilities Monitoring Information
MRO Parts Availability ES.4
Production Plans P3.4
Production Quality and Policies
! EM.5 !
! EM.6 !
! EM.7 !
Cost to Produce
Internal Capacity
Projected Delivery Requirements EM.6, ED.6
! EM.8 !
Conformance Rules
Conformance Plan
Monitoring
Internal Information
! EM.9 !
3.3.45
EM.1
Manage Production Rules
The process of establishing, maintaining, and enforcing rules for managing production
details in line with business strategy, goals, and objectives. Production details include part/
item master, bills of materials/formulas, routings, processes, equipment requirements,
tooling, and other information specifying the method of production for a particular product.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Automatic Generation /
Configuration Of Tooling / Set-Up
Instructions
Automated Engineering
Specifications
Implement an EMS
Implement an EMS
Workflow/Groupware
Genealogy Tracking
Document Control
3.3.46
EM.1
Inputs
Business Plan
Transportation Capacity
EP.6
Corporate Objectives and
Strategies
> EM.1
> ProductionOutputs
Rules
Production Plans
P3.4
Inventory Capacity
Production Capacity
EP.5
Product Design
3.3.47
EM.2
Manage Production Performance
The process of developing and maintaining performance standards and analysis methods
to compare actual production performance against the established standards. This process
allows the development and implementation of a course of action to achieve targeted
performance.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Develop environmental
performance standards.
Implement an EMS
Implement an EMS
Inputs
Business Plan
Transportation Capacity
EP.6
Corporate Objectives and
Strategies
Production Plans
P3.4
Inventory Capacity
Inputs
Production Rules
> EM.2
Production Capacity
EP.5
Product Design/Quality
3.3.48
EM.3
Manage MAKE Information
The process of managing, collecting, maintaining, and communicating information to
support MAKE planning and execution processes. The information to be managed includes
production, order and process data.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Continuous Improvement
Inputs
Outputs
Systems Capabilities
Information Needed to Create
and Maintain IT
Information from Business
Processes
> EM.3
3.3.49
EM.4
Manage In-Process Products (WIP)
The process of establishing and maintaining limits or levels, replenishment models,
ownership, product mix and stocking locations for In-Process Product (WIP).
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Optimize Packing
Dunnage Control
Tracking, genealogy
Description/Definition cont.
3.3.50
EM.4
Vendor Managed Inventory
Part / WIP location by date received for those parts that must
be stocked or staged in a holding area
Inputs
Capacity Requirements
Production Orders Planned &
Actual Reports
Returned Product Information
> EM.4
Outputs
3.3.51
EM.5
Manage MAKE Equipment and Facilities
The process of specifying maintaining and dispositioning MAKEs capital assets to operate
the supply chain production processes. This includes repair, alteration, calibration and other
miscellaneous items to maintain production capabilities.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Changeover Reduction /
Continuous Improvement Program
Systematic Disposition Of
Equipment
3.3.52
EM.5
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Outputs
Inputs
Budgets
Manufacturers Recommended
Maintenance Schedules &
Specifications
Equipment and Facilities Monitoring Information
MRO Parts Availability
ES.4
Production Plans
P3.4
Production Quality and Policies
> EM.5
>
3.3.53
EM.6
Manage Transportation (WIP)
The process of transporting In-Process Product (WIP). This includes management of the
activities associated with in transit handling and movement of In-Process Product (WIP).
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Packaging volume,
% of pallets that are reusable,
% of trucks using retread tires,
% of vehicle fuel derived from alternative fuels,
Cost to Manage Transportation,
% of paints used that are non-toxic
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.3.54
EM.6
Inputs
Equipment and Facilities
Replacement and Disposition
Plans
EM.5
Production Orders Planned &
Actual Reports
WIP Handling Rules, Move
Information and Methods
EM.4
Capacity Requirements
Projected Delivery
Requirements
EM.7
Outputs
> EM.6
Supplier Agreement
ES.10, S3.2
Product Location Information
M1.2, M2.2, M3.3
3.3.55
EM.7
Manage Production Network
The process of identifying and maintaining a network of intra-company production units
that deliver specific semi-finished materials or product sets to the final production site.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Collaborative Planning/Scheduling
JIT Environment
Production Reporting/Status
Inputs
Planning Data
EP.3
Production Status
EM.5
Supply Chain Plans
P1.4
3.3.56
Outputs
> EM.7
Cost to Produce
Capacity
> Internal
Projected Delivery
Requirements
EM.6, ED.6
EM.8
Manage Make Regulatory Environment
The process of identifying and complying with regulatory documentation and process
standards set by external entities (eg government)
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Automated Conformance
Monitoring And Control
Implement an EMS
Implement an EMS
Inputs
Equipment and Facilities
Characteristics
External Regulatory
Information
> EM.8
Outputs
3.3.57
EM.9
Manage Supply Chain Make Risk
The process of managing Make risks within an overall supply Chain risk Program. This
includes identifying and assessing make risks as well as and planning and implementing
responses to Make risks. Make risks include potential events that could impact your ability
to make on-time at a reasonable cost with good quality. The risks can occur internally within
your organization, e.g. a matching breakdown or facility fire, or externally, e.g. a hurricane,
that impacts your ability to Make. Response planning includes: mitigation, either reducing
the impact of a Make risk event or reducing the likelihood it will occur; transfer; acceptance.
An organization has a high level of control and flexibility of action concerning internal Make
risks, so they are prime candidates for control Response planning can be aggregated for
make risks across the organization.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.3.58
EM.9
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Business rule reconfiguration typically includes an assessment of
the impact of each rule change on the overall supply chain before
actual implementation.
3.3.59
EM.9
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Crisis Communications
Planning
Inputs
Monitoring
Internal Information
3.3.60
Outputs
> EM.9
D
Deliver
The processes associated with performing customer-facing order management and order
fulfillment activities.
Process Categories
D1: Deliver Stocked
Product
3.4.1
D1
Deliver Stocked Products
The process of delivering product that is sourced or made based on aggregated customer
orders, projected orders/demand and inventory re-ordering parameters. The intention of
Deliver Stocked Product is to have the product available when a customer order arrives (to
prevent the customer from looking elsewhere). For services industries, these are services
that are pre-defined and off-the-shelf (e.g. standard training). Products or services that
are configurable cannot be delivered through the Deliver Stocked Product process, as
configurable products require customer reference or customer order details.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Cost to Deliver,
Finished Goods Inventory Days of Supply,
Order Management Costs
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Postponement
Electronic Catalogues/Malls
None identified
Internet Ordering
None identified
None identified
3.4.2
D1
! D1.1 !
! D1.2 !
Optional Payment
Validated Order D1.3
Customer Order D3.4, ED.2
Actual Sales History P5.1
Shipping Preferences (Customer) ED.3
Validated Order D1.3
Purchase History ED.3
Customer Address Data ED.3
Location of Customers ED.7
Contract Status ED.3
Credit History D2.2, ED.3
! D1.3 !
! D1.4 !
! D1.5 !
! D1.6 !
! D1.7 !
Customer Inquiry
3.4.3
D1
Authorization to Scrap SR1.2, SR2.2, SR3.2
Inventory Availability S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2, M3.3,
D1.8, D4.2
Production Schedule M1.1, M2.1, M2.2, M3.2
Scheduled Receipts S1.1, S2.1, S3.3
Finished Product Release M1.6, M2.6, M3.7
Authorization to Return to Service SR1.2, SR2.2, SR3.2
! D1.8 !
A
Inventory Available S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2, M3.3,
D1.8, D4.2
Shipment Routes D1.7, D2.6, D3.5
! D1.9
D1.10
Shipping Parameters and Documentation ED.6
Shipping Export Parameters and Documentation ED.8
! D1.11 !
D1.12
D1.13 !
3.4.4
! D1.14 !
! D1.15 !
Payment
D1.1
Process Inquiry and Quote
Receive and respond to general customer inquiries and requests for quotes
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
Inputs
Customer Inquiry
> D1.1
Outputs
3.4.5
D1.2
Receive, Enter and Validate Order
Receive orders from the customer and enter them into a companys order processing
system. Orders can be received through phone, fax, or electronic media. Technically
examine orders to ensure an orderable configuration and provide accurate price. Check the
customers credit. Optionally accept payment.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
Continuous Replenishment
Programs; Vendor Managed
Inventory, Telemetry to
Automatically Communicate
Replenishment of Chemicals
3.4.6
D1.2
Outputs
Optional Payment
Validated Order
D1.3
Customer Order
D3.4, ED.2
Inputs
> D1.2
Shipping Preferences
(Customer)
ED.3
Customer Quote
D1.1
Purchase History
ED.3
3.4.7
D1.3
Reserve Inventory and Determine Delivery Date
Inventory (both on hand and scheduled) is identified and reserved for specific orders and a
delivery date is committed and scheduled.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Priority-Based Inventory
Reservations, for Key Customers,
with FIFO Allocation for All Others
None identified
Available-to-Promise (ATP)
None identified
3.4.8
D1.3
Inputs
Outputs
Delivery Plan
P4.4
Inventory Availability
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.8, D4.2
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
Production Schedule
M1.1, M2.1, M2.2, M3.2
Validated Order
D1.2
Production Plans
P3.4
Delivery Date
D1.4, D2.4
> D1.3
Replenishment Signal
S1.1, S1.4, S2.1, S2.4, S3.3, S3.6
Backlog
> Order
P1.1, P4.1
Inventory Availability/Delivery
Date
P4.2
Shipments
P1.1
3.4.9
D1.4
Consolidate Orders
The process of analyzing orders to determine the groupings that result in least cost/best
service fulfillment and transportation.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Inputs
Delivery Date
D1.3, D2.3
3.4.10
> D1.4
Outputs
Shipment Volume
> Daily
D1.5
D1.5
Build Loads
Transportation modes are selected and efficient loads are built.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Daily Shipment Volume
D1.4
Outputs
> D1.5
>
Load Information
P4.2, D1.6, D2.6, D3.6
Plan and Build Loads
Information
SR1.4, SR2.4, SR3.4
3.4.11
D1.6
Route Shipments
Loads are consolidated and routed by mode, lane and location.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Consolidation of Carriers
CRP/VMI
Inputs
Load Information
D1.5, D2.5, D3.5
Rated Carrier Data
> D1.6
Outputs
Routes
> Shipment
D1.7, D2.7
Routing Guide
3.4.12
D1.7
Select Carriers and Rate Shipments
Specific carriers are selected by lowest cost per route and shipments are rated and tendered.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Shipment Routes
D1.6, D2.6
> D1.7
Outputs
Deliveries
> Scheduled
D1.9
3.4.13
D1.8
Receive Product from Source or Make
The activities such as receiving product, verifying, recording product receipt, determining
put-away location, putting away and recording location that a company performs at its own
warehouses. May include quality inspection.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Automatic Identification
Cross-Docking
Merge-in-Transit
3.4.14
D1.8
Inputs
Authorization to Scrap
SR1.2, SR2.2, SR3.2
Inventory Availability
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.8, D4.2
Production Schedule
M1.1, M2.1, M2.2, M3.2
Scheduled Receipts
S1.1, S2.1, S3.3
Finished Product Release
M1.6, M2.6, M3.7
Outputs
> D1.8
>
Inventory Availability
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.8, D4.2
Existing Inventory Data
ES.4, ED.4
Authorization to Return to
Service
SR1.2, SR2.2, SR3.2
3.4.15
D1.9
Pick Product
The series of activities including retrieving orders to pick, determining inventory availability,
building the pick wave, picking the product, recording the pick and delivering product to
shipping in response to an order.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Fill Rate
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Merge-in-Transit
Wave picking
Inputs
Inventory Available
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.8, D4.2
> D1.9
Outputs
Shipment Routes
D1.7, D2.6, D3.5
3.4.16
D1.10
Pack Product
The activities such as sorting / combining the products, packing / kitting the products, paste
labels, barcodes etc. and delivering the products to the shipping area for loading.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None Identified
None Identified
Inputs
None Identified
> D1.10
Outputs
3.4.17
D1.11
Load Vehicle & Generate Shipping Docs
The series of tasks including placing/loading product onto modes of transportation,
and generating the documentation necessary to meet internal, customer, carrier and
government needs. Shipping documentation includes the invoice. Optionally verify
customer credit.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Documentation Accuracy,
Delivery Performance to Customer Commit Date
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Shipment Tracking
None identified
None identified
Carrier Agreement
None identified
Cross-Docking
3.4.18
D1.11
Outputs
Order Backlog
P1.1, P4.1
Inputs
Shipping Parameters and
Documentation
ED.6
Shipping Export Parameters
and Documentation
ED.8
> D1.11
Shipping History
ED.8
3.4.19
D1.12
Ship Product
The process of shipping the product to the customer site.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Shipment Tracking
None identified
Cross-Docking
Inputs
None Identified
3.4.20
> D1.12
Outputs
D1.13
Receive and Verify Product by Customer
The process of receiving the shipment by the customer (either at customer site or at
shipping area in case of self-collection) and verifying that the order was shipped complete
and that the product meets delivery terms.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Outputs
Inputs
None Identified
> D1.13
> Product
S1.2, S2.2, S3.4, D1.14, D2.14,
D3.14
3.4.21
D1.14
Install Product
When necessary, the process of preparing, testing and installing the product at the
customer site. The product is fully functional upon completion.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Perfect Condition,
% Of Faultless Installations
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Product
D1.13, D2.13, D3.13
3.4.22
> D1.14
Outputs
Product
> Installed
D1.15, D2.15
D1.15
Invoice
A signal is sent to the financial organization that the order has been shipped and that the
billing process should begin and payment be received or be closed out if payment has
already been received. Payment is received from the customer within the payment terms of
the invoice.
Performance Attributes
Metric
% of Faultless Invoices,
Documentation Accuracy
None Identified
Cost to Invoice
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Inputs
Installed Product
D1.14, D2.14, D3.14
> D1.15
> Payment
Outputs
3.4.23
D2
Deliver Make-to-Order Product
The processes of delivering product that is sourced, configured, manufactured, and/or
assembled from standard raw materials, parts, ingredients or sub-assemblies, in response
to a specific firm customer order. A reference to the customer order is exchanged with the
sourcing or make process and attached to or marked on the product. Products in stock are
identifiable by customer order through labeling and inventory data management. Examples
include assigning a serial number, lot number or batch number to a customer order prior to
Make or Source, processes that generate a bill-of-materials for the associated Make process
(e.g. configure-to-order and assemble-to-order) and the special order process in retail.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Cost to Deliver,
Energy Costs,
Finished Goods Inventory Days of Supply
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Postponement
3.4.24
D2
Customer Inquiry
D2.1 !
! D2.2 !
! D2.3 !
! D2.4 !
! D2.5 !
! D2.6 !
! D2.7
3.4.25
D2
D2.8
Production Schedule M1.1, M2.1, M2.2, M3.2
WIP Location Rules EM.6
Finished Product Release M1.6, M2.6, M3.7
Inventory Availability S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2, M3.3,
D1.8, D4.2
! D2.9
D2.10
Shipping Parameters and Documentation ED.6
Shipping Export Parameters and Documentation ED.8
!D2.11 !
D2.12
3.4.26
!D2.13 !
!D2.14 !
!D2.15 !
Payment
D2.1
Process Inquiry and Quote
Receive and respond to general customer inquiries and requests for quotes.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
None identified
Inputs
Customer Inquiry
> D2.1
Outputs
Quote (Customer)
> Order
D2.2
3.4.27
D2.2
Receive, Configure, Enter and Validate Order
Receive orders from the customer and enter them into a companys order processing
system. Orders can be received through phone, fax, or through electronic media. Configure
your product to the customers specific needs, based on standard available parts or options.
Technically examine order to ensure an orderable configuration and provide accurate
price. Check the customers credit. Optionally accept payment.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Configuration
None identified
None identified
None identified
3.4.28
D2.2
Outputs
Location of Customers
ED.7
Purchase History
ED.3
Contract Status
ED.3
Inputs
Configuration Rules
ED.1
Credit History
D1.2, D2.2, D3.1
Optional Payment
Contract Terms
Order Rules
ED.1
Credit History
D1.2, D2.2, D3.1
> D2.2
3.4.29
D2.3
Reserve Inventory and Determine Delivery Date
Inventory and/or planned capacity is identified and reserved for specific orders, and a
delivery date is committed and scheduled.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Available-to-Promise (ATP)
Automatic Reservation of
Inventory and Dynamic Sourcing
of Product for Single Shipment to
Customer
3.4.30
D2.3
Outputs
Inputs
Delivery Date
D1.4, D2.4
Delivery Plans
P4.4
Order Signal
P2.1, P3.1
Production Plans
P3.4
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
Booked Order
D2.2
Inventory Availability
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.8, D4.2
Production Schedule
M1.1, M2.1, M2.2, M3.2
Order Backlog
P1.1, P4.1
> D2.3
Status
> Inventory
Customer Order
D3.4, ED.2
Replenishment Signal
S1.1, S1.4, S2.1, S2.4, S3.3, S3.6
Available to Promise Date
Inventory Availability/Delivery
Date
P4.2
3.4.31
D2.4
Consolidate Orders
The process of analyzing orders to determine the groupings that result in least cost/best
service fulfillment and transportation.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Delivery Date
D1.3, D2.3
3.4.32
> D2.4
Outputs
Orders
> Consolidated
D2.5
D2.5
Build Loads
Transportation modes are selected and efficient loads are built.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Consolidated Orders
D2.4
> D2.5
Outputs
Information
> Load
P4.2, D1.6, D2.6, D3.6
3.4.33
D2.6
Route Shipments
Loads are consolidated and routed by mode, lane, and location.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Consolidation of Carriers
CRP/VMI
Inputs
Rated Carrier Data
Load Information
D1.5, D2.5, D3.5
Routing Guide
3.4.34
Outputs
> D2.6
Shipment Routes
D1.7, D2.7
D2.7
Select Carriers and Rate Shipments
Specific carriers are selected by lowest cost per route and shipments are rated and tendered.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Shipment Routes
D1.6, D2.6
> D2.7
Outputs
3.4.35
D2.8
Receive Product from Source or Make
The activities such as receiving product, verifying, recording product receipt, determining
put-away location, putting away and recording location for goods received from either Make
or Source. May include quality inspection.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Automatic Identification
Cross-Docking
Inputs
None Identified
3.4.36
> D2.8
Outputs
D2.9
Pick Product
The series of activities including retrieving orders to pick, verifying inventory availability,
building the pick wave, picking the product, recording the pick and delivering product to
packing area in response to an order.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Inputs
Production Schedule
M1.1, M2.1, M2.2, M3.2
WIP Location Rules
EM.6
Finished Product Release
M1.6, M2.6, M3.7
> D2.9
Outputs
Inventory Availability
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.8, D4.2
3.4.37
D2.10
Pack Product
The activities such as sorting / combining the products, packing / kitting the products, paste
labels, barcodes etc. and delivering the products to the shipping area for loading.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Inputs
None Identified
3.4.38
> D2.10
Outputs
D2.11
Load Product & Generate Shipping Docs
The series of tasks including placing/loading product onto modes of transportation,
and generating the documentation necessary to meet internal, customer, carrier and
government needs. Shipping documentation includes the invoice. Optionally verify
customer credit.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Carrier Agreement
None identified
Cross-Docking
3.4.39
D2.11
Outputs
Inputs
Shipping Parameters and
Documentation
ED.6
Shipping Export Parameters
and Documentation
ED.8
3.4.40
> D2.11
History
> Shipping
ED.8
Shipping Documents
Delivered End Items
D2.12
Ship Product
The process of shipping the product to the customer site.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Shipment Tracking
None identified
Cross-Docking
Inputs
None Identified
> D2.12
Outputs
3.4.41
D2.13
Receive and Verify Product by Customer
The process of receiving the shipment at the customer (either at customer site or at
shipping area in case of self-collection) and verifying that the order was shipped complete
and that the product meets delivery terms.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Perfect Condition,
Delivery Performance to Customer Commit Date
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Shipment Tracking
None identified
Inputs
Advance Ship Notice
D2.11
3.4.42
Outputs
> D2.13
> Product
S1.2, S2.2, S3.4, D1.14, D2.14,
D3.14
D2.14
Install Product
When necessary, the process of preparing, testing and installing the product at the customer
site. The product is fully functional upon completion.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Perfect Condition,
% Of Faultless Installations
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Product
D1.13, D2.13, D3.13
> D2.14
Outputs
Product
> Installed
D1.15, D2.15
3.4.43
D2.15
Invoice
A signal is sent to the financial organization that the order has been shipped and that the
billing process should begin and payment be received or be closed out if payment has
already been received. Payment is received from the customer within the payment terms of
the invoice.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Documentation Accuracy,
% of Faultless Invoices
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Inputs
Installed Product
D1.14, D2.14, D3.14
3.4.44
> D2.15
> Payment
Outputs
D3
Deliver Engineer-to-Order Products
The process of obtaining, responding to, and allocating resources for a customer order that
has unique requirements or specifications and delivering a product that is partially or fully
designed, redesigned, manufactured, and/or assembled from a bill of materials or recipe
that includes one or more custom parts or ingredients. Design will begin only after the
receipt and validation of a firm customer order.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Supply Chain
Responsiveness
Cost to Deliver,
Energy Costs,
Order Management Costs,
Finished Goods Inventory Days of Supply
3.4.45
D3
! D3.1 !
! D3.2 !
Optional Payment
Customer Order D3.4, ED.2
Location of Customers ED.7
Approved Contract D3.3
Customer Order Size, Weight, and Freight Class ED.6
! D3.3 !
! D3.4 !
! D3.5 !
! D3.6
RFQ/RFP
D3.7
3.4.46
D3
D3.8
Production Schedule M1.1, M1.2, M2.2, M3.2
Finished Product Release M1.6, M2.6, M3.7
Inventory Availability S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2, M3.3,
D1.8, D4.2
! D3.9
D3.10
Shipping Export Parameters and Documentation ED.8
Shipping Parameters and Documentation ED.6
!D3.11 !
D3.12
D3.13!
Product D1.13, D2.13, D3.13
!D3.14 !
D3.15!
Payment
3.4.47
D3.1
Obtain & Respond to RFP/RFQ
The process of receiving a request for proposal or request for quote, evaluating the request
(estimating the schedule, developing costs estimates, establishing price), and responding to
the potential customer.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
Outputs
Contract Status
ED.3
Customer address Data
ED.3
Inputs
RFQ/RFP
> D3.1
Completed Proposal
> D3.2
Purchase History
ED.3
Credit History
D2.2, ED.3
Shipping Preferences
(Customer)
ED.3
3.4.48
D3.2
Negotiate and Receive Contract
The process of negotiating order details with customer (e.g.: price, schedule, product
performance) and finalizing the contract. Optionally accept payment.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Inputs
Completed Proposal
D3.1
Order Rules
ED.1
Outputs
> D3.2
Optional Payment
Location of Customers
ED.7
Approved Contract
D3.3
Customer Order Size, Weight,
and Freight Class
ED.6
3.4.49
D3.3
Enter Order, Commit Resources & Launch Program
The process of entering/finalizing the customers order, approving the planned resources
(e.g., engineering, manufacturing, etc.) and officially launching the program.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Outputs
Customer Order
D3.4, ED.2
Inputs
Delivery Plans
P4.4
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
Production Plans
P3.4
Production Schedule
M1.1, M2.1, M2.2, M3.2
Approved Contract
D3.2
> D3.3
Order Information
> M3.1
Resource Availability
P4.2, D4.1
Replenishment Signal
S1.1, S1.4, S2.1, S2.4, S3.3, S3.6
Order Backlog
P1.1, P4.1
Order Signal
P2.1, P3.1
3.4.50
D3.4
Schedule Installation
The process of evaluating the design and build schedules relative to customer requested
installation date to determine installation schedule.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Schedule to maximize
transportation capacity
Inputs
Customer Order
D1.2, D2.3, D3.2, D3.3
> D3.4
Outputs
Installation
> Scheduled
D3.5
3.4.51
D3.5
Build Loads
Transportation modes are selected and efficient loads are built.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Scheduled Installation
D3.4
3.4.52
Outputs
> D3.5
Information
> Load
P4.2, D1.6, D2.6, D3.6
Scheduled Deliveries
D1.9
D3.6
Route Shipments
Loads are consolidated and routed by mode, lane, and location.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Consolidation of Carriers
CRP/VMI
Inputs
Load Information
D1.5, D2.5, D3.5
Rated Carrier Data
> D3.6
Outputs
> None Identified
Routing Guide
3.4.53
D3.7
Select Carriers & Rate Shipments
Specific carriers are selected by lowest cost per route and shipments are rated and tendered.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
None Identified
3.4.54
> D3.7
Outputs
D3.8
Receive Product from Source or Make
The activities such as receiving product, verifying, recording product receipt, determining
put-away location, putting away and recording location for goods received from either Make
or Source. May include quality inspection.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Automatic Identification
Cross-Docking
Inputs
Product S1, S2, S3, M1, M2, M3
> D3.8
Outputs
3.4.55
D3.9
Pick Product
The series of activities including retrieving orders to pick, verifying inventory availability,
building the pick wave, picking the product, recording the pick and delivering product to
packing area in response to an order.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Production Schedule
M1.1, M1.2, M2.2, M3.2
Finished Product Release
M1.6, M2.6, M3.7
> D3.9
Outputs
Inventory Availability
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.8, D4.2
3.4.56
D3.10
Pack Product
The activities such as sorting / combining the products, packing / kitting the products, paste
labels, barcodes etc. and delivering the products to the shipping area for loading.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
None Identified
> D3.10
Outputs
3.4.57
D3.11
Load Product & Generate Shipping Docs
The series of tasks including placing/loading product onto modes of transportation,
and generating the documentation necessary to meet internal, customer, carrier and
government needs. Shipping documentation includes the invoice. Optionally verify
customer credit.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Documentation Accuracy
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Cross-Docking
None identified
None identified
Carrier Agreement
Inputs
Shipping Export Parameters
and Documentation
ED.8
Shipping Parameters and
Documentation
ED.6
3.4.58
Outputs
> D3.11
History
> Shipping
ED.8
Shipping Documents
D3.12
Ship Product
The process of shipping the product to the customer site.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Cross-Docking
Shipment Tracking
None identified
Inputs
None Identified
> D3.12
Outputs
3.4.59
D3.13
Receive and Verify Product by Customer
The process of receiving the shipment (either at customer site or at shipping area in case
of self-collection) and verifying that the order was shipped complete and that the product
meets delivery terms.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Shipment Tracking
None identified
Inputs
None Identified
> D3.13
Outputs
> Product
S1.2, S2.2, S3.4, D1.14, D2.14,
D3.14
3.4.60
D3.14
Install Product
The process of preparing, testing and installing the product at the customer site. The
product is fully functional upon completion.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Perfect Condition
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None Identified
None identified
Inputs
Product
D1.13, D2.13, D3.13
> D3.14
Outputs
Product
> Installed
D1.15, D2.15
3.4.61
D3.15
Invoice
A signal is sent to the financial organization that the order has been shipped and that the
billing process should begin and payment be received or be closed out if payment has
already been received. Payment is received from the customer within the payment terms of
the invoice.
Performance Attributes
Metric
% of Faultless Invoices,
Documentation Accuracy
None Identified
Cost to Invoice
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Inputs
None Identified
3.4.62
> D3.15
> Payment
Outputs
D4
Deliver Retail Product
Deliver Retail Products are the processes used to acquire, merchandise, and sell finished
goods at a retail store. A retail store is a physical location that sells products (and services)
direct to the consumer using a point of sale process (manual or automated) to collect
payment. Merchandising at a store level is the stocking and restocking of products in
designated storage locations to generate sales in a retail store.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
Cost to Deliver
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None Identified
None identified
3.4.63
D4
Resource Availability D3.3
Vendor/DC inventory availability
Store Allocation Instructions
Daily Replenishment Requirements S1.4
Shipping Schedules (internal or 3PL)
Stocking Requirements P4.4
On-demand Replenishment Requirements
! D4.1 !
! D4.2 !
Replenishment Quantities
On-Order/Backorder
Inventory in Stock
Item Pick Sheet for Stocking Schedule D4.2
Inventory Availability S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2, M3.3,
D1.8, D4.2
! D4.3 !
! D4.4 !
! D4.5 !
! D4.6 !
D4.7 !
3.4.64
D4
Generate Stocking Schedule
The process of scheduling resources to support item-stocking requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Resource Availability
D3.3
Vendor/DC inventory
availability
Store Allocation Instructions
Daily Replenishment
Requirements
S1.4
> D4.1
Outputs
Schedule
> Stocking
D4.4
3.4.65
D4.2
Receive Product at the Store
The activities such as receiving product, verifying, recording product receipt, determining
put-away location, putting away and recording location that a company performs at its own
stores. May include quality inspection.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Inventory Availability
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.8, D4.2
Production Schedule
M1.1, M2.1, M2.2, M3.2
Item Stocking Requirements
P4.1
Finished Product Release
M1.6, M2.6, M3.7
Outputs
> D4.2
Inventory Availability
Scheduled Receipts
S1.1, S2.1, S3.3
3.4.66
D4.3
Pick Product from Backroom
The process of retrieving restocking orders to pick, determining inventory availability,
building a pick wave, picking item and quantity from a designated backroom warehouse
location, recording the resulting inventory transaction, and delivering the product to point
of stock.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
Inputs
Replenishment Quantities
On-Order/Backorder
Inventory in Stock
Item Pick Sheet for Stocking
Schedule
D4.2
Outputs
> D4.3
>
Inventory Availability
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6, M1.2, M2.2,
M3.3, D1.8, D4.2
3.4.67
D4.4
Stock Shelf
For restocks, the tasks associated with identifying the item location, stocking the shelf
according to merchandise plans, and recording the appropriate inventory transaction. For
promotional items and stock repositioning the tasks associated with shelf and point of sale
preparation, stock placement, and end of sale activities.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Each area of the store has its own stocking plan and items are
routed specifically to that area.
Inputs
Vendor Merchandising / Co-op
advertising agreements
Stocking Schedule
D4.1
Plan-o-gram Data
Loaded Retail Cart or Pallet
S1.4, D4.3
3.4.68
> D4.4
Outputs
Shelf Locations
> Full
D4.5
D4.5
Fill Shopping Cart
Typical set of tasks associated with product selection, storage and movement through to
checkout.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Substitution
Inputs
Lost or Dropped Shopping
Carts
Product Data (linked/related
SKUs)
Merchandising Plan
> D4.5
Outputs
3.4.69
D4.6
Checkout
The processes and tasks associated with product checkout including scanning, method of
payment, credit application and approval, service agreement, order confirmation, and/or
invoice or receipt.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Cost to Checkout
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
Outputs
Point of Sale Data (Daily)
P4.1
Inputs
Full Cart Ready for Checkout
D4.5
Customer Profile/Data
Promotion Event Calendar
> D4.6
3.4.70
D4.7
Deliver and/or Install
The process of preparing and installing the product at the customer site. The product is fully
functional upon completion.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
None identified
None identified
Outputs
Consistently High Adoption
Rates
Inputs
None Identified
> D4.7
Installation / Live
> Successful
System
High Customer Services
Satisfaction Levels
Low Rates of Failure
3.4.71
ED
Enable Deliver
The collection of processes associated with managing and monitoring Deliver process data,
performance and relationships.
Process Categories
ED.1: Manage Deliver Business Rules
3.4.72
ED
Management Process Reports ED.2
Configuration Rules ED.1
Planning Decision Policies EP.1
Supply-Chain Performance Metrics ES.4, EM.2, ED.2,
ER.2
! ED.1 !
! ED.2 !
! ED.3 !
! ED.4 !
! ED.5 !
! ED.6 !
! ED.7 !
! ED.8 !
Internal Information
Monitoring
! ED.9 !
3.4.73
ED.1
Manage Deliver Business Rules
The process of defining and maintaining rules which affect the acceptance of an order,
based on quantity, method of delivery, credit, customer experience, etc. (Include
distribution channel rules)
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Include environmental
requirements
Inputs
Management Process Reports
ED.2
Configuration Rules
ED.1
Planning Decision Policies
EP.1
Supply-Chain Performance
Metrics
ES.4, EM.2, ED.2, ER.2
3.4.74
> ED.1
Outputs
Rules
> Order
D1.2, D2.2, D3.2, ED.4, ED.5
Configuration Rules
ED.1
ED.2
Assess Delivery Performance
The process of defining the requirement and monitoring the performance of the delivery of
product to a customer. When physical delivery is out-sourced the performance is passed on
to source for contract administration.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Documentation Accuracy,
Perfect Condition
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Outputs
Inputs
> ED.2
Performance
> Supply-Chain
Metrics
ED.1, ED.5, EP.2
Customer Service
Requirements
ED.6
3.4.75
ED.3
Manage Deliver Information
The process of collecting, maintaining, and communicating information to support deliver
planning and execution processes. The information to be managed includes: order data
- (customer preference, history, status, and delivery requirements, etc.), warehouse data,
transportation data, and deliver data.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
3.4.76
ED.3
Inputs
Booked Order
D2.2
Contract Status
D1.2, D2.2, D3.1
Customer Address Data
D1.2, D2.2, D3.1
Shipping Preferences
(Customer)
D1.2, D2.2, D3.1
Outputs
> ED.3
Master Database/Up
> Customer
to Date
ED.4
Credit History
D1.2, D2.2, D3.1
Purchase History
D1.2, D2.2, D3.1
3.4.77
ED.4
Manage Finished Goods Inventories
The process of establishing and maintaining finished goods, inventory limits or levels,
replenishment models, ownership, product mix, stocking locations
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Spill control
Spill control
3.4.78
ED.4
Inputs
Customer Master Database/Up
to Date
ED.3
Outputs
Finished Goods Inventory
Location
S1.4, S2.4, S3.6
Order Rules
ED.1
Returns Data
ED.8
Scrap Authorization
ED.8
> ED.4
Delivery Performance
ED.2
Inventory Rules
ED.4
3.4.79
ED.5
Manage Deliver Capital Assets
Acquisition, maintenance, and disposition of order management, warehouse and
transportation capital assets. Determine material handling (inventory) pick pack & ship
methods (inventory), and equipment.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Inputs
Order Rules
ED.1
Budgets
Approved Item Master
Supply-Chain Performance
Metrics
ES.4, EM.2, ED.2, ER.2
Outputs
> ED.5
Delivery Performance
> ED.2
Warehouse Operating
Constraints
Inventory Rules
ED.4
3.4.80
ED.6
Manage Transportation
The process of 1) defining and maintaining the information which characterizes product,
containerization, vehicle, route, terminals, regulations, rates/tariffs and backhaul
opportunity (Characterization include information necessary to support maintenance of
internal Outbound Transportation equipment - CAPITAL ASSETS) and 2) the management of
transporters.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Pooling
3.4.81
ED.6
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Inputs
Contract Carrier Rates
ES.8
Outputs
> ED.6
Delivery Performance
ED.2
Parameters and
> Shipping
Documentation
D1.11, D2.11, D3.11
Customer Service
Requirements
ED.2
Customer Order Size, Weight,
and Freight Class
D2.2, D3.2
3.4.82
ED.7
Manage Product Life Cycle
The process of defining and maintaining the distribution channel/ network for a specific
product line (no capital asset or transportation management).
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Take-back program
None identified
None identified
None identified
Inputs
Product Mix and Plans
Location of Customers
D1.2, D2.2, D3.2
Budgets
Government Constraints
ED.8
> ED.7
Outputs
3.4.83
ED.8
Manage Import/Export Requirements
The process of recording and maintaining regulations and rates, which constrain the
ordering and delivering of product.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Multi-country Export/Import
documentation compliance
None identified
Assessing Export/Import
Requirements during Time of
Product Development/Manufacture
Documents Generated
Automatically During Shipment
Preparation.
3.4.84
ED.8
Outputs
Shipping Export Parameters
and Documentation
D1.11, D2.11, D3.11
Inputs
Shipping History
D1.11, D2.11, D3.11
Government Regulations
Receipt Verification
S1.2, S1.3, S2.2, S2.3, S3.4, S3.5
Tariffs & Duties
> ED.8
Authorization
> Scrap
ED.4
Government Constraints
ED.7
Returns Data
ED.4
Duty Drawback Claims
3.4.85
ED.9
Manage Supply Chain Deliver Risk
The process of managing Deliver risks within an overall Supply Chain Risk Program. This
includes identifying and assessing Deliver risks as well as and planning and implementing
responses to Deliver risks. Delivery risks include all potential events that could impact
companys ability to deliver on-time at a reasonable cost and quality. In particular, the risk
areas addressed are Transportation (weather related transportation issues, ocean freight),
Inventory management (accuracy, stock-out, damaged inventory.), Order management
(fulfillment accuracy, delayed delivery), and Document compliance (invoicing issue,
customs procedures).
Performance Attributes
Metric
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.4.86
ED.9
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
3.4.87
ED.9
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Inputs
Internal Information
Monitoring
3.4.88
Outputs
> ED.9
R
Return
The processes associated with moving material from a customer back through the supply
chain to address defects in product, ordering, or manufacturing, or to perform upkeep
activities.
Process Categories
SR1: Source Return Defective
Product
3.5.1
R
SR3: Source Return Excess Product
3.5.2
SR1
Source Return Defective Product
The return and disposition determination of defective products as defined by the warranty
claims, product recall, non-conforming product and/or other similar policies including
appropriate replacement. The Return Defective Product supports any type of product not
conforming to specifications (including order non-conformance such as late or otherwise
improper delivery); company business rules determine the definition of defective. The
physical disposition of the product may not be part of the return process.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None Identified
None identified
3.5.3
SR1
! SR1.1 !
! SR1.2 !
! SR1.3 !
! SR1.4 !
! SR1.5 !
Shipment Documents
Returned Defective Product SR1.2, SR1.3, SR1.4, SR1.5
3.5.4
SR1.1
Identify Defective Product Condition
The process where the customer utilizes planned policies, business rules and product
operating conditions inspection as criteria to identify and confirm that material is excess to
requirements defective.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Business Rules for Return
Processes
ES.1, ER.1
Warranty Data
ER.8
> SR1.1
Outputs
> Return Defective
Product
3.5.5
SR1.2
Disposition Defective Product
The process of the customer determining whether to return the defective item and the
appropriate source contact for a return authorization.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
Outputs
Return Inventory Availability
SR1.3, SR1.4, SR1.5, SR2.3, SR2.4,
SR2.5, SR3.3, SR3.4, SR3.5
Inputs
Returned Defective Product
SR1.2, SR1.3, SR1.4, SR1.5
Returned Plans
P5.4
> SR1.2
Authorization to Return to
Service
D1.8
3.5.6
SR1.3
Request Defective Product Return Authorization
The process of a customer requesting and obtaining authorization, from last known holder
or designated return center, for the return of defective product. Additionally, the customer
and last known holder or designated return center would discuss enabling conditions such
as return replacement or credit, packaging, handling, transportation and import / export
requirements to facilitate the efficient return of the defective product.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Enable Customer-Service
Representatives to Complete the
Bill Of Lading for the Customer
Including Carrier Routing, Weight,
Description and Class to Minimize
Guesswork & Wrong Estimates
3.5.7
SR1.3
Outputs
Ship-to Data
SR1.4, SR2.4, SR3.4
Inputs
> SR1.3
3.5.8
SR1.4
Schedule Defective Product Shipment
The process where the customer develops the schedule for a carrier to pick-up for delivery
of the defective product. Activities include selecting the carrier and rates, preparing the
item for transfer, preparing scheduling documentation and managing overall scheduling
administration.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Inputs
Validated Return Material
Authorization
SR1.3, SR3.3
Return Inventory Availability
SR1.2, SR2.2, SR3.2, ER.4
Return Defective Product
SR1.2, SR1.3, SR1.4, SR1.5
Credit Exchange Options
SR1.3, SR2.3, SR3.3
Ship-to Data
SR1.3, SR2.3, SR3.3, DR1.1,
DR2.1, DR3.1
Outputs
> SR1.4
>
3.5.9
SR1.5
Return Defective Product
The process where the customer packages, and handles the defective product in
preparation for shipping in accord with pre-determined conditions. The product is then
provided by the customer to the carrier who physically transports the product and its
associated documentation to the last known holder or designated return center.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Return Defective Product
SR1.2, SR1.3, SR1.4, SR1.5
Return Defective Product
SR1.2, SR2.2, SR3.2, ER.4
Scheduled Defective Product
Return
SR1.4
Outputs
> SR1.5
3.5.10
DR1
Deliver Return Defective Product
The receipt and disposition determination of defective products as defined by the warranty
claims, product recall, non-conforming product and/or other similar policies including
appropriate replacement. The Return Defective Product supports any type of product not
conforming to specifications (including order non-conformance such as late or otherwise
improper delivery); company business rules determine the definition of defective. The
physical disposition of the product may not be part of the return process.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
3.5.11
DR1
Manage Integrated Supply Chain Inventory
Information DR1.1, DR2.1, DR3.1
Defective Product Return Authorization
Request SR1.3
Business Rules for Return Processes ES.1, ER.1
Return Plans P5.4
Defective Product Disposition Request SR1.3
Pruduct Return Capabilities P5.4
!DR1.1!
!DR1.2!
!DR1.3!
!DR1.4!
3.5.12
DR1.1
Authorize Defective Product Return
The process where the last known holder or designated return center receives a defective
product return authorization request from a customer, determines if the item can be
accepted and communicates decision to the customer. Accepting the request would include
negotiating the conditions of the return with the customer, including authorizing return
replacement or credit. Rejecting the request would include providing a reason for the
rejection to the customer.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
None identified
3.5.13
DR1.1
Inputs
Manage Integrated Supply
Chain Inventory Information
DR1.1, DR2.1, DR3.1
Outputs
Manage Integrated Supply
Chain Inventory Information
DR1.1, DR2.1, DR3.1
> DR1.1
Return Plans
P5.4
Ship-to Data
SR1.4, SR2.4, SR3.4
3.5.14
DR1.2
Schedule Defective Return Receipt
The process where the last known holder or designated return center evaluates the
defective product handling requirements including negotiated conditions and develops a
schedule that tells the Customer when to ship the product. The scheduling activity would
also inform Receiving when to expect the shipment and where to send the product, for
disposition, upon receipt.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Outputs
Inputs
Valid Returns Request
DR1.1, DR2.1
> DR1.2
Returns Request
> Valid
SR1.3, SR2.3, SR3.3, DR1.3,
DR2.3, DR3.3
3.5.15
DR1.3
Receive Defective Product (includes verify)
The process where the last known holder or designated return center receives and verifies
the returned defective product against the return authorization and other documentation
and prepares the item for transfer.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
t
t
None Identified
t
t
t
t
3.5.16
DR1.3
Inputs
Return Transportation
Guidelines, Policies, &
Agreements
ER.6
Returned Defective Product
SR1.2, SR1.3, SR1.4, SR1.5
Receipt Data
ER.3, ER.4
> DR1.3
Outputs
Discrepancy
> Receipt
Notification
3.5.17
DR1.4
Transfer Defective Product
The process where the last known holder or designated return center transfers the defective
product to the appropriate process to implement the disposition decision.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
Returned Defective Product
SR1.2, SR1.3, SR1.4, SR1.5
Return Inventory for Transfer
ER.4
3.5.18
Outputs
> DR1.4
Defective Products
S1.2, S2.2
SR2
Source Return MRO Product
The return of Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) products or company assets for
the purpose of servicing, repairing or upgrading it, as defined by Maintenance Plans or the
occurrence or anticipation of risk of failure. Generally company assets managed through a
MRO process are expected to be refurbished to a useable condition and returned to service.
The Return process does not represent the actual maintenance, repair or overhaul activities;
these are generally represented by Make processes. The physical disposition of the product
may not be part of the return process.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
3.5.19
SR2
! SR2.1 !
! SR2.2 !
! SR2.3 !
! SR2.4 !
! SR2.5 !
3.5.20
SR2.1
Identify MRO Product Condition
The process where the customer utilizes pre-determined MRO policies, business rules
and product operating conditions as criteria to identify and confirm that an item requires
maintenance, repair, overhaul or disposal. Includes operating failures and planned
maintenance requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None Identified
None identified
Inputs
Manage Regulatory Return
Policy
ER.8
Warranty Data
ER.8
Outputs
> SR2.1
>
3.5.21
SR2.2
Disposition MRO Product
The process of the customer determining whether to service the item, what service is
required, and who the appropriate service provider would be to service the item. Outputs
include a decision to: (1) send a return authorization request to a service provider, (2) send
the product back into service without requiring a return authorization request, or (3)
discard the item.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Outputs
Return Inventory Availability
SR1.3, SR1.4, SR1.5, SR2.3, SR2.4,
SR2.5, SR3.3, SR3.4, SR3.5
Inputs
Returned MRO Products
SR2.1, SR2.2, SR2.3, SR2.5
Return Plans
P5.4
> SR2.2
>
Authorization to Return to
Service
D1.8
Authorization to Scrap
D1.8
Returned MRO Products
SR2.1, SR2.2, SR2.3, SR2.5
Return Product Location
ER.4
3.5.22
SR2.3
Request MRO Return Authorization
The process of a customer requesting and obtaining authorization, from a service provider,
for the return of an MRO product. In addition to discussing the MRO issue, the customer
and service provider would discuss enabling conditions such as return replacement or
credit, packaging, handling, transportation and import / export requirements to facilitate
the efficient return of the MRO product to the service provider. The customer may need to
go through several return authorization iterations with multiple service providers before
authorization is received.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Outputs
Credit/Exchange Options
SR1.4, SR2.4, SR3.4
Inputs
Retrun Inventory Availability
SR1.2, SR2.2, SR3.2, ER.4
Return Schedule Instructions
DR1.2, DR2.2, DR3.2
MRO Return Authorization,
Response
DR2.1
Returned MRO Products
SR2.1, SR2.2, SR2.3, SR2.5
> SR2.3
Return Rates
> Historical
P5.1
3.5.23
SR2.4
Schedule MRO Shipment
The process where the customer develops the schedule for a carrier to pick-up and deliver
the MRO product. Activities include selecting the carrier and rates, preparing the item
for transfer, preparing scheduling documentation and managing overall scheduling
administration.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Inputs
Ship-to Data
SR1.3, SR2.3, SR3.3, DR1.1,
DR2.1, DR3.1
Credit/Exchange Options
SR1.3, SR2.3, SR3.3
Returned Inventory
Availability
SR1.2, SR2.2, SR3.2, ER.4
> SR2.4
Outputs
MRO Return
> Scheduled
SR2.5
3.5.24
SR2.5
Return MRO Product
The process where the customer packages, and handles the MRO product in preparation
for shipping in accord with pre-determined conditions. The product is then provided
by the customer to the carrier who physically transports the product and its associated
documentation to the service provider.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Scheduled MRO Return
SR2.4
Returned Inventory
Availability
SR1.2, SR2.2, SR3.2, ER.4
Returned MRO Products
SR2.1, SR2.2, SR2.3, SR2.5
Outputs
> SR2.5
MRO Product
> Returned
SR2.1, SR2.2, SR2.3, SR2.5
Shipping Documents
3.5.25
DR2
Deliver Return MRO Product
The receipt of Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) products or company assets for
the purpose of servicing, repairing or upgrading it, as defined by Maintenance Plans or the
occurrence or anticipation of risk of failure. Generally company assets managed through a
MRO process are expected to be refurbished to a useable condition and returned to service.
The Return process does not represent the actual maintenance, repair or overhaul activities;
these are generally represented by Make processes. The physical disposition of the product
may not be part of the return process.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None Identified
None identified
3.5.26
DR2
Return Plans P5.4
MRO Disposition Request SR2.3
Product Return Capabilities P5.4
MRO Return Authorization Request SR2.3
Business Rules for Return Processes ES.1, ER.1
Manage Integrated Supply Chain Inventory
Information DR1.1, DR2.1, DR3.1
!DR2.1!
!DR2.2!
!DR2.3!
!DR2.4!
3.5.27
DR2.1
Authorize MRO Product Return
The process where a service provider receives an MRO product return authorization request
from a customer, determines if the item can be accepted for MRO and communicates their
decision to the customer. Accepting the request would include negotiating the conditions
of the return with the customer, including authorizing return replacement or credit.
Rejecting the request would include providing a reason for the rejection to the customer.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
None identified
3.5.28
DR2.1
Inputs
Outputs
Return Plans
P5.4
> DR2.1
3.5.29
DR2.2
Schedule MRO Return Receipt
The process where the service provider evaluates the MRO service requirements including
negotiated conditions and develops a schedule that tells the Customer when to ship the
part. The scheduling activity would also inform Receiving when to expect the shipment and
where to send the part, for induction or storage, upon receipt.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Valid Returns Request
DR1.1, DR2.1
> DR2.2
Outputs
Schedule Instructions
> Return
SR1.3, SR2.3, SR3.3, DR1.3,
DR2.3, DR3.3
3.5.30
DR2.3
Receive MRO Product
The process where the service provider receives and verifies the returned MRO item against
the return authorization and other documentation and prepares the item for transfer.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None Identified
t
t
t
t
t
t
3.5.31
DR2.3
Inputs
Receipt Data
ER.3, ER.4
Return Transportation
Guidelines, Policies, &
Agreements
ER.6
Returned MRO Product
SR2.1, SR2.2, SR2.3, SR2.5
> DR2.3
Outputs
Discrepancy
> Receipt
Notification
Return Regulatory
Requirements
ER.8
Return Schedule Instructions
DR1.2, DR2.2, DR3.2,
3.5.32
DR2.4
Transfer MRO Product
The process where the service provider transfers the MRO product to the appropriate
process to implement the disposition decision.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Return Inventory for Transfer
ER.4
Returned MRO Product
SR2.1, SR2.2, SR2.3, SR2.5
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
Outputs
> DR2.4
3.5.33
SR3
Source Return Excess Product
The return of excess or aging inventory or obsolete products as defined by the terms and
conditions of a customer/supplier contract. The intention of excess product returns is to
reallocate inventory to a location or organization that can sell the product that is considered
in excess in the current location. The physical disposition of the product may not be part of
the return process.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.5.34
SR3
! SR3.1 !
! SR3.2 !
! SR3.3 !
! SR3.4 !
! SR3.5 !
Shipment Documents
3.5.35
SR3.1
Identify Excess Product Condition
The process where the customer utilizes planned policies, business rules and product
inspection as criteria to identify and confirm that material is in excess of the current
requirements.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Business Rules for Return
Processes
ES.1, ER.1
Manage Regulatory Return
Policy
ER.8
3.5.36
Outputs
> SR3.1
Excess Product
> Returned
SR3.2, SR3.3, SR3.4, SR3.5, DR3.3,
DR3.4
SR3.2
Disposition Excess Product
The process of the customer determining whether to return the excess material and
identification of a designated return center a return authorization.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
Outputs
Authorization to Scrap
D1.8
Inputs
Returned Excess Product
SR3.1, SR3.2, SR3.4, DR3.3
Return Plans
P5.4
> SR3.2
Authorization to Return to
Service
D1.8
3.5.37
SR3.3
Request Excess Product Return Authorization
The process of a customer requesting and obtaining authorization, from the designated
return center, for the return of excess product. Additionally, the customer and designated
return center would negotiate enabling conditions such as return credit or cash discount,
packaging, handling, transportation and import / export requirements to facilitate the
efficient return of the excess product.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Enable Customer-Service
Representatives to Complete the
Bill Of Lading for the Customer
Including Carrier Routing, Weight,
Description and Class to Minimize
Guesswork & Wrong Estimates
None identified
3.5.38
SR3.3
Outputs
Excess Product Return
Authorization Request
SR3.3
Inputs
Excess Product Return
Authorization Request
SR3.3
Return Schedule Instructions
DR1.2, DR2.2, DR3.2
Return Inventory Availability
SR1.2, SR2.2, SR3.2, ER.4
Returned Excess Product
SR3.1, SR3.2, SR3.4, DR3.3
Ship-to Data
SR1.4, SR2.4, SR3.4
> SR3.3
>
3.5.39
SR3.4
Schedule Excess Product Shipment
The process where the customer develops the schedule for a carrier to pick-up the excess
product. Activities include selecting the carrier and rates, preparing the item for transfer,
preparing scheduling documentation and managing overall scheduling administration.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Preventative management
None identified
Inputs
Validated Return Material
Authorization
SR1.3, SR3.3
Credit/ Exchange Options
SR1.3, SR2.3, SR3.3
Returned Excess Product
SR3.1, SR3.2, SR3.4, DR3.3
Plan and Build Loads
Information
D1.5
Return Inventory Availability
SR1.2, SR2.2, SR3.2, ER.4
Outputs
> SR3.4
>
Ship-to Data
SR1.3, SR2.3, SR3.3, DR1.1,
DR2.1, DR3.1
3.5.40
SR3.5
Return Excess Product
The process where the customer packages, and handles the excess product in preparation
for shipping in accord with pre-determined conditions. The product is then provided
by the customer to the carrier who physically transports the product and its associated
documentation to the last known holder or designated return center.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Load, Shipping, Verify, and
Credit Information
D1.11
Returned Excess Product
SR3.1, SR3.2, SR3.4, DR3.3
Return Inventory Availability
SR1.2, SR2.2, SR3.2, ER.4
> SR3.5
Outputs
> Shipment Documents
3.5.41
DR3
Deliver Return Excess Product
The receipt of excess or aging inventory or obsolete products as defined by the terms and
conditions of a customer/supplier contract. The intention of excess product returns is to
reallocate inventory to a location or organization that can sell the product that is considered
in excess in the current location. The physical disposition of the product may not be part of
the return process.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.5.42
DR3
Business Rules for Return Processes ES.1, ER.1
Excess Product Return Authorization Request SR3.3
Excess Product Disposition Request SR3.3
Product Return Capabilities P5.4
Manage Integrated Supply Chain Inventory
Information DR1.1, DR2.1, DR3.1
Return Plans P5.4
!DR3.1!
!DR3.2!
!DR3.3!
!DR3.4!
3.5.43
DR3.1
Authorize Excess Product Return
The process where the designated return center receives an excess product return
authorization request from a customer, determines if the item can be accepted and
communicates their decision to the customer. Accepting the request would include
negotiating the conditions of the return with the customer, including authorizing credit or
cash discount. Rejecting the request would include providing a reason for the rejection to
the customer.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None identified
None identified
Inputs
Business Rules for Return
Processes
ES.1, ER.1
Outputs
Manage Integrated Supply
Chain Inventory Information
DR1.1, DR2.1, DR3.1
> DR3.1
Return Plans
P5.4
3.5.44
DR3.2
Schedule Excess Return Receipt
The process where the l designated return center evaluates an authorized excess material
return to determine packaging and handling requirements. This assessment will lead to
the development of a return disposition decision and a return schedule with terms and
conditions that will tell the Customer how and when to ship the product. The scheduling
activity would also inform the Return Centers Receiving department when to expect the
shipment and where to send the product, for disposition, upon receipt.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
Energy Costs,
Cost to Schedule Excess Product Receipt
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None Identified
Inputs
Return Product Authorization
DR3.1
> DR3.2
Outputs
Schedule Instructions
> Return
SR1.3, SR2.3, SR3.3, DR1.3,
DR2.3, DR3.3
3.5.45
DR3.3
Receive Excess Product
The process where the designated return center receives and verifies the returned excess
product and associated documentation against the return authorization and other
documentation and prepares the item for transfer. Administrate any discrepancies that
arise.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
t
t
None Identified
t
t
t
t
3.5.46
DR3.3
Inputs
Return Regulatory
Requirements
ER.8
Receipt Data
ER.3, ER.4
Return Schedule Instructions
DR1.2, DR2.2, DR3.2
Returned Excess Product
SR3.1, SR3.2, SR3.4, DR3.3
Outputs
> DR3.3
Receipt Discrepancy
Notification
Return Transportation
Guidelines, Policies, &
Agreements
ER.6
3.5.47
DR3.4
Transfer Excess Product
The process where the designated return center transfers the excess product to the
appropriate process to implement the disposition decision.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Sourcing Plans
P2.4
Returned Excess Product
SR3.1, SR3.2, SR3.4, DR3.3
Return Inventory for Transfer
ER.4
3.5.48
Outputs
> DR3.4
Excess Products
S1.2, S2.2
ER
Enable Return
The collection of processes associated with managing and monitoring Return process data,
performance and relationships.
Process Categories
ER.1: Manage Business Rules for
Return Processes
3.5.49
ER
ER.8: Manage Return Regulatory
Requirements and Compliance
3.5.50
ER
Process Procedures P5.4
Return Rules and Policies P5.4
! ER.1 !
! ER.2 !
! ER.3 !
! ER.4 !
! ER.5 !
! ER.6 !
! ER.7 !
! ER.8 !
Monitoring
Internal Information
! ER.9 !
3.5.51
ER.1
Manage Business Rules for Return Processes
The process of establishing, maintaining, and enforcing decision support criteria for Return
Planning that are translated into rules for conducting business. These rules align Return
process policies with business strategy, goals, and objectives. Examples of business rules
include those that (1) Enable customers to identify when scheduled and unscheduled
conditions occur that require a return authorization request, (2) Enable a service provider
to confirm a part is authorized to be returned, (3) Identify the waiting period to confirm a
return item has been shipped and received before following up (4) Develop and maintain
customer and channel performance standards of return processes such as service levels,
given service requirements by supply chain stakeholders/trading partners.(5) Communicate
to customers the allowable amount of elapsed time from purchase and condition in which
excess material must be received in order for it to be accepted as a return (6) Negotiate any
restocking charge stipulations.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None Identified
None Identified
Pull signals.
Outputs
Inputs
Process Procedures
P5.4
Return Rules and Policies
P5.4
3.5.52
> ER.1
>
ER.2
Manage Performance of Return Processes
The process of measuring actual Return Process performance against internal and/or
external standards to develop and implement a course of action to achieve targeted
performance levels.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Continuous Improvement is
Planned through Process Reviews
and Customer Feedback
Outputs
Inputs
MRO Product Return
Capabilities
ER.2, ER.5
Return Benchmark Data
Process Procedures
P5.4
Receipt Data
ER.3, ER.4
> ER.2
Supply-Chain Performance
Metrics
EP.2, ED.1, ED.5
3.5.53
ER.3
Manage Return Data Collection
The process of collecting, integrating and maintaining the accuracy of return execution
information necessary to plan the recovery of supply chain resources.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
t
t
Inputs
Data Cleansing Procedure
Data System Requirements
Return Product History
ER.2
3.5.54
Outputs
> ER.3
ER.4
Manage Return Inventory
The process of establishing a return process inventory strategy and planning the recovery
process inventory limits or levels (including Raw Material, Work In Process, Finished and
Purchased Finished Goods) including replenishment models, ownership, product mix, and
stocking locations, both inter and intra company.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Outputs
Receipt Data
DR1.3, DR2.3, DR3.3, ER.2
Inputs
Return Inventory Transfer Data
DR1.4, DR2.4, DR3.3, DR3.4
Return Plans
P5.4
Return Product Location
SR1.2, SR2.2, SR3.2, ER.4
Business Rules for Return
Processes
ES.1, ER.1
> ER.4
3.5.55
ER.5
Manage Return Capital Assets
The process of acquiring, maintaining and dispositioning capital assets such as fork lift
trucks, information systems and equipment in receiving docks that are utilized in support
of Return. Management activities would include defining asset requirements, determining
resource availability and conducting gap analysis and resolution. The process includes
lease-buy and outsourcing decisions.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
t
t
Inputs
Business Rules for Return
Processes
ES.1, ER.1
Return Performance
ER.2
Outputs
> ER.5
Product Return
> MRO
Capabilities
P5.2, ER.2
Return Plans
P5.4
3.5.56
ER.6
Manage Return Transportation
The process of providing the least cost transportation of a returned product from a customer
location to the appropriate service provider location within specified time frames. Can
include interim transportation activities conducted within more than one service provider
locations. Includes defining and implementing a Return transportation strategy throughout
the supply chain, maintaining transportation-related information (rates, lead times) and
managing transportation performance.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None Identified
None Identified
Pooling
None Identified
3.5.57
ER.6
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
None Identified
None Identified
Measurement of Carrier
Performance for On-time Delivery
and Completeness
Inputs
Return Performance
ER.2
Return Plans
P5.4
3.5.58
Outputs
> ER.6
>
Return Transportation
Guidelines, Policies, &
Agreements
DR1.3, DR2.3, DR3.3
ER.7
Manage Return Network Configuration
The process where customer and service provider locations involved in the flow of returns
are defined and maintained throughout the supply chain. Locations include retail and
wholesale customer and supplier sites, manufacturing facilities, distribution centers,
warehouses, repair depots and military bases. How unserviceable material flow throughout
the network is governed by the specific supply chains business rules. (See ER1)
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
Inputs
Business Rules for Return
Processes
ES.1, ER.1
Return Plans
P5.4
Outputs
> ER.7
>
3.5.59
ER.8
Manage Return Regulatory Requirements and Compliance
The process of identifying and complying with regulatory documentation and process
standards set by external entities (i.e. government, trade officials, etc.) when planning for
the Return of Assets. Includes Customs requirements and Import / Export Controls.
Performance Attributes
Metric
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Best Practices
Description/Definition
None Identified
None Identified
3.5.60
ER.8
Outputs
Inputs
Business Rules for Return
Processes
ES.1, ER.1
Return Network Configuration
ER.7
Process Procedures
P5.4
Warranty Data
SR1.1, SR2.1
> ER.8
>
3.5.61
ER.9
Manage Supply Chain Return Risk
The process of managing Return risks within an overall Supply Chain Risk Program. This
includes identifying and assessing Return risks as well as and planning and implementing
responses to Return risks. Return risks include potential events that could impact you or the
customers ability to Return goods in a timely manner at a reasonable cost with minimal
damage. Risk Management includes: mitigation, either reducing the impact of a risk event
or reducing the likelihood it will occur.
Performance Attributes
Metric
Best Practices
Description/Definition
3.5.62
ER.9
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
3.5.63
ER.9
Best Practices cont.
Description/Definition cont.
Inputs
Monitoring
Internal Information
3.5.64
Outputs
> ER.9
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Actual Shrink
Approved Contract
Authorization to Return
to Service
Authorization to Scrap
3.6.1
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Benchmark Data
Bill of Materials
Booked Order
Budget Constraints
Budgets
3.6.2
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Business Plan
Capacity Constraints
3.6.3
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Capacity Requirements
Capital Assets
Carrier Contracts
(Customer)
Completed Proposal
Configuration Rules
Conformance Plan
Conformance Rules
Consistently High
Adoption Rates
Consolidated Orders
3.6.4
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Continuous Improvement
Process
Contract Status
Contract Terms
Contractual Obligations
Cost to Produce
3.6.5
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Credit History
Customer Data
(preference)
Customer Inquiry
Customer Loyalty /
Recurring Visits
D4.6: Checkout
Customer Master
Database/Up to Date
Customer Order
3.6.6
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Customer Profile/Data
D4.6: Checkout
Customer Quote
Customer Replenish
Signal
Replenish Signal
Customer Requirements
Customer Service
Requirements
Daily Replenishment
Requirements
Data System
Requirements
Defective Product
Disposition Request
3.6.7
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Defective Products
Deliver Return
Requirements
Delivery Date
Delivery Performance
3.6.8
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Delivery Plans
Delivery Requirements
Engineering Design
Enterprise Distribution
Model
EOQ/ESQs
3.6.9
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
ETO Proposal
Excess Product
Disposition Request
3.6.10
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Excess Products
External Regulatory
Information
3.6.11
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
D4.6: Checkout
Government Constraints
Requirements established by a
government which must be met before
allowing the shipping, delivery of a
product or manufacture of an item.
Government Regulations
Import/Export
Requirements
Requirements established by a
government or trading areas (i.e EU,
NAFTA etc) which must be met before
allowing the shipping or delivery of a
product across national boundaries.
Incoming Product
Information
3.6.12
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Information Feedback
Information from
Business Processes
Information
Infrastructure Plan
Information Needed to
Create and Maintain IT
Information Needs
Analysis
Installed Product
3.6.13
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Integrated
Supply Chain
Inventory
Information
Internal Adjustments
Internal Capacity
Internal Information
Inventory
3.6.14
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Inventory Availability
Inventory Availability/
Delivery Date
Inventory Capacity
Inventory in Stock
Inventory Rules
3.6.15
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Inventory Status
Inventory Strategy
Item Master
Item Stocking
Requirements
3.6.16
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Load Information
Location of Customers
Logistics Selection
Lost or Dropped
Shopping Carts
D4.6: Checkout
Make/Buy Decision
Manage Integrated
Supply Chain Inventory
Information
Management Process
Reports
3.6.17
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Manage Regulatory
Return Policy
Manufacturers
Recommended
Maintenance Schedules &
Specifications
Markdown Plans
Merchandise Category/
Classification
Merchandising
Plan
Methods, Procedures,
Processes
Monitoring
3.6.18
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
MRO Products
MRO Return
Authorization Request
MRO Return
Authorization Response
On-demand
Replenishment
Requirements
On-Order/Backorder
Optional Payment
3.6.19
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Order Backlog
Order Information
Order Rules
Order Signal
Outsource Plan
3.6.20
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Payment
D3.15: Invoice
D2.15: Invoice
D1.15: Invoice
Payment Terms
Planning Data
3.6.21
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Planning Decision
Policies
Plan-o-gram Data
D4.6: Checkout
P4.1: Identify, Prioritize and Aggregate
Delivery Requirements
Preventative
Maintenance and
Calibration Schedule
Process Procedures
3.6.22
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Procurement Signal
(Supplier)
Product
Product/Category
Lifecycle
Product Availability
Product Design
Product Design/Claims
3.6.23
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Product Design/Quality
Product Inventory
Location
Production
Capacity
Production Orders
Planned & Actual Reports
Production Plans
3.6.24
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Production
Quality &
Policies
Process
EM.2: Manage Production Performance
Production
Requirements
Production Resources
Production Rules
3.6.25
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Production Schedule
Production Status
Product Location
Information
Product On Order
3.6.26
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Product Requirements
Product Return
Capabilities
Product Routings
Product Sources
Projected Delivery
Requirements
3.6.27
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Promotion/Event Plans
Promotional Plan
Promotion Event
Calendar
D4.6: Checkout
Purchase History
Quality &
Delivery
Performance
3.6.28
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Receipt Data
Receipt Discrepancy
Notification
Receipt Verification
Regulatory Requirements
3.6.29
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Replenishment
Quantities
Replenishment Signal
Resource Availability
Return Defective
Product
Returned Defective
Product
3.6.30
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Returned Product
Information
Return Inventory
Availability
3.6.31
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Return Network
Configuration
Return Performance
Return Plans
Return Process
Capabilities
3.6.32
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Return Product
Authorization
Return Production
Requirements
Return Regulatory
Requirements
Return Requirements
Return Resources
3.6.33
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Return Schedule
Instructions
Returns Data
Return Transportation
Guidelines, Policies, &
Agreements
Return Transportation
Guidelines, Policies,
and Agreements
Revised Aggregate
Forecast and Projections
Revised Business
Assumptions
3.6.34
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
RFQ/RFP
Risk Management
Program for Process Area
Routing Guide
Satisfied Customer
D4.6: Checkout
Scheduled Defective
Product Return
Scheduled Deliveries
Scheduled Excess
Product Return
Scheduled Installation
3.6.35
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Scheduled Receipts
Scrap Authorization
Service Levels
Service Requirements
Shipment Documents
Shipment Routes
Shipments
Shipping Documents
3.6.36
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Shipping Export
Parameters and
Documentation
Shipping History
Shipping Preferences
(Customer)
Shipping Schedules
(internal or 3PL)
Ship-to Data
3.6.37
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Source Return
Requirements
Sourcing Plans
Standard Practices/Rules
Stocking Requirements
3.6.38
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Stocking Schedule
Stock-out History
Store Allocation
Instructions
Strategic Plan
Successful Installation /
Live System
Supplier Agreement
Supplier Data
Supplier Performance
3.6.39
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Supply Chain
Performance
Improvement Plan
Supply-Chain
Performance Metrics
Supply Chain
Requirements
Systems Capability
Transferred Product
3.6.40
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Transportation Capacity
Validated Order
Vendor/DC inventory
availability
Vendor Merchandising
/ Co-op advertising
agreements
Warehouse Operating
Constraints
3.6.41
Inputs/Outputs
Input/Output
Definition
Process
Warranty Data
WIP Move
Information
and Metholds
3.6.42
Section 4
Best Practices
SCOR
Available-to-Promise (ATP)
Available-to-Promise (ATP) provides an availability and feasibility check concerning a
customer request or a customer order whereas three outputs can be distinguished:
1. the soonest delivery date concerning the customer request,
2. the confirmation of desired delivery date, item quantity, and item configuration
3. the selection of alternative, but deliverable product variants in case the desired delivery
parameters can not be fulfilled.
ATP is applicable over multiple sites in a global environment. Essentially, it is based on the
extrapolation of the available inventory in all relevant locations over time:
ATP is the uncommitted portion of a companys inventory and planned production
maintained in the master schedule to support customer-order promising. The ATP quantity
is the uncommitted inventory balance in the first period and is normally calculated for each
period, in which an MPS (Master Production Schedule) receipt is scheduled.
SCOR Process(es)
D1.3 (Reserve Resources and Determine Delivery Date)
Best Practice Need and Suitability Indicators
ATP is particularly suitable for environments where customers require on-time and fast deliveries.
Additional Comments
Three methods of ATP calculations are used: discrete ATP, cumulative ATP with look-ahead, and
cumulative ATP without look-ahead.
Discrete available-to-promise is calculated based on beginning inventory, planned production
according to the master production schedule (MPS) and customer commitments. For the first period,
the available-to-promise is the sum of the beginning inventory plus the planned production for the
first period minus customer commitments for the first period and all periods following the first period
up to, but not including, the next period for which production has been scheduled in the MPS. For
the following periods, there are two possibilities:
t If a master production quantity has been scheduled for the period the available-to-promise is
the quantity scheduled minus all customer commitments for the period and for all following
periods up to but not including, the next period for which a master production quantity has
been scheduled.
t If no master production quantity has been scheduled for the period the available-to-promise
is zero, even if deliveries in the period have been promised. The promised shipments often are
shown as backlog (customer commitments) in the period with the most recent production (MPS).
Cumulative available-to-promise is a calculation based on the available-to-promise (ATP) figure in
the master schedule. Two methods of computing the cumulative available-to-promise are used, with
and without look-ahead calculation. The cumulative with look-ahead ATP equals the ATP from the
previous period plus the MPS of the period minus the sum of the differences between the backlogs
and MPSs of all future periods until, but not to include, the period where point production exceeds
the backlogs. The cumulative without look-ahead procedure equals the ATP in the previous period
plus the MPS, minus the backlog in the period being considered.
4.1.1
SCOR
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Responsiveness
Flexibility
Costs
Asset
Management
Visibility of demand vs. production schedule and available inventory can result
in better inventory planning and lower inventory levels.
Other Success
Factors
Additional Resources
Cox, J. F.; Blackstone J. H. (2004): American Production and Inventory Control Society (APICS)
Dictionary, 11th edition, APICS The Educational Society for Resource Management, Alexandria, VA
Schnsleben, P. (2003): Integral Logistics Management Planning & Control of Comprehensive
Supply Chains, St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton, FL, p. 233-235
4.1.2
SCOR
Carrier Agreements
Carrier agreements are agreements between a company and its domestic and global
carriers (for both, inbound raw materials and outbound finished goods) specifying service
levels, payment terms, and other conditions. Such agreements can be established as part
of a larger initiative to decrease raw material and finished goods inventory, while improving
customer service.
Contractual partnership requirements can include:
t Perfect Order Fulfilment (as a primary goal),
t equipment condition
t shipping condition
t pick-up and delivery times,
t documentation.
Carrier performance in these fields is measured with immediate feedback and monthly
formal reports. By measuring all carriers on a regular basis, trends of performance can be
seen. This provides the opportunity to replace carriers performing poorly with those
performing exceptionally.
Furthermore, a transportation service agreement is signed with all domestic and global
carriers. Contract line items specify on-time delivery, plus the payment requirements for
services rendered.
SCOR Process(es)
S1.2, S2.2, S3.2 (Receive Product), ES.2 (Assess Supplier Performance), ES.7 (Manage Supplier
Network), ES.9 (Manage Supplier Agreements), D1.11, D2.11, D3.11 (Load Vehicle & Generate
Shipping Documentation)
Best Practice Need and Suitability Indicators
Any company receiving or shipping materials using common or contract carriers such as trucking,
shipping, and airline companies. Also includes internal transportation providers (company owned
transportation group).
Additional Comments
The top performance of carriers is due to a thorough knowledge of the industry and the
requirements of a company, as well as the contract that is used with the carriers. Without a
competent transportation manager, the contract, alone, would be of little value. The combination of
trained, competent personnel and written agreements result in superior performance.
4.1.3
SCOR
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Responsiveness
Carrier agreements often improve the ability to quickly book and execute
transportation, reducing lead times.
Flexibility
Costs
Carrier agreements provide a tool for both shipper and carrier to identify and
take advantage of mutual cost savings.
Asset
Management
From the carrier side, their tracking systems support performance measurement
to a different degree (EDI, web-enabled carriers). Continuous on line tracking of
shipment would be beneficial.
Other Success
Factors
Anyone interfacing with the carrier needs to be familiar with the carrier
agreement specifications.
Formal recognition of carriers, for example, they can be certified on basis of six
months reliability/compliance to the agreement. Formal feedback on monthly
performance and immediate feedback on failures to comply with specifications.
Additional Resources
None Identified
4.1.4
SCOR
Collaborative Planning, Forecasting and Replenishment (CPFR)
The CPFR reference model provides a general framework for the collaborative aspects of
planning, forecasting and replenishment processes. The model is considered a guideline
for trading partner collaboration, which should be tailored specially for the industry and
company readiness and maturity.
CPFR defines eight collaboration tasks:
t Collaboration Arrangement is the process of setting the business goals for the
relationship, defining the scope of collaboration and assigning roles, responsibilities,
checkpoints and escalation procedures.
t The Joint Business Plan then identifies the significant events that affect supply and
demand in the planning period, such as promotions, inventory policy changes, store
openings/closings, and product introductions.
t Sales Forecasting projects consumer demand at the point of sale.
t Order Planning/Forecasting determines future product ordering and delivery
requirements based upon the sales forecast, inventory positions, transit lead times, and
other factors.
t Order Generation transitions forecasts to firm demand.
t Order Fulfillment is the process of producing, shipping, delivering, and stocking
products for consumer purchase.
t Exception Management is the active monitoring of planning and operations for out-ofbounds conditions.
t Performance Assessment calculates key metrics to evaluate the achievement of business
goals, uncover trends or develop alternative strategies.
Based on this general framework, CPFR discusses collaboration scenarios (like
replenishment collaboration or collaborative assortment planning), collaboration roles
(who of the two partners involved is responsible for collaboration tasks), and organizational
implications within partner companies.
The CPFR industry standard is sponsored by VICS, the Voluntary Inter-industry Standards
body and the Uniform Code Council, UCC. The standard has also been adopted by the
Global Commerce Initiative, GCI.
SCOR Process(es)
P1 (Plan Supply Chain)
Best Practice Need and Suitability Indicators
Companies that heavily rely on demand forecast accuracy and high volume replenishment are
primary beneficiaries of the standard.
Additional Comments
CPFR has primarily been adopted by the retail and consumer package goods industry. Wal-Mart was
the founding company of the process and recently announced adoption by 1,200 of its suppliers. The
process has also been adopted by the grocery industry as well as the chain drug store industry.
4.1.5
SCOR
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Responsiveness
Flexibility
Forecast improvement
20% - 40%
Costs
3% - 4%
Asset Management
Inventory Reduction
2% - 8%
2% - 8%
Additional Resources
www.cpfr.org
is the official website for the VICS CPFR Working group. This site contains multiple publications
on CPFR as well as the actual CPFR process mapping guidelines, data model formats, and CPFR
presentations.
Suleski, Janet (2001): Beyond CPFR: Retail Collaboration Comes of Age, AMR Research, April 1, 2001.
www.globalscorecard.net
The Global Scorecard. This site provides a Capability Assessment Tool designed to give you a
detailed understanding of your ECR (Efficient Consumer Response) capability and highlight specific
improvement opportunities for your company. ECR was an early foundation for CPFR.
www.drummondgroup.com
The Drummond Group on CPFR interoperability has certified technology companies. Test results are
available on their web site.
4.1.6
SCOR
Co-Located Procurement Representatives
Regionalized Procurement Representatives are positioned in local markets to support
corporate / procurement goals. Companies realize support is needed when cost and
delivery objectives are not consistent with organizational goals. This leading practice
involves identifying local procurement personnel to assist in creating a supply base to meet
internal and external product requirements. These local representatives will perform all
procurement related activities for the organization. Co-located procurement personnel
bring the knowledge of the local supply base, understand their organizations demand and
supply signals, and communication capability to work with company global commodity
leadership.
For companies expanding their sourcing scope and distance, having personnel local to
the market is a crucial element to maintaining supply chain performance. Local personnel
are used to support the understanding of the demand and supply signals, production
and logistics decisions. Companies that have sourced globally, but have not added local
resources find challenges that diminish supply chain response time. Listed are some of the
major factors: 1.) Communication (time, language, cultural) 2.) Lead time, 3.) Hidden Costs
(taxes, tariffs, etc.), 4.) Quality Returns and Repairs, 5.) Political and Geography Risks, 6.) Units
of Measure.
Cost is the huge driver in this Best Practice. For example, decisions affecting the supply
chain can be made more accurately and in a timelier manner by experts in the field who can
experience the day-to-day activities.
SCOR Process(es)
P1 (Plan Supply Chain)
Best Practice Need and Suitability Indicators
The best practice is most of all suitable for companies that source a large portion of their
procurement volume in low-wage countries with a different culture.
Additional Comments
Regular meetings at least once a year among peers should be organized to share priorities and to
align processes and reapplication opportunities.
4.1.7
SCOR
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Responsiveness
Flexibility
Costs
Asset Management
None identified
Additional Resources
None Identified
4.1.8
SCOR
Convergence of SCOR, Six Sigma and Lean Methodology
SCOR, a cross-industry top-down standardized process analysis model, enables the efficient
and effective end-to-end evaluation of supply chains. By capturing operational baselines
and comparing to industry peers and competitors, SCOR level one metrics provide a
balanced measure of performance linked to the bottom line. Metrics and Best Practices
steer teams to proven solutions, and the building block design provides a common
language for both internal and external elements of a supply chain. SCOR therefore serves
as a strategic project identification and prioritization engine for Lean and Six Sigma teams
and provides the means to measure business impact.
The strength of Six Sigma and Lean is producing results. These powerful methodologies
can be used to gain efficiency and construct valuable processes because these disciplines,
by their nature, look down at finite areas, cells, or processes to improve. They cannot look
upward at organizational goals and select the best project on which to work.
SCOR also helps introduce the concepts of Six Sigma and Lean to transactional (non
manufacturing) areas not normally associated with productivity or quality initiatives. With
its cross functional makeup a SCOR project team will focus on reducing variability and
eliminate waste in areas such as accounting, customer service, and sales.
SCOR Process(es)
None Identified
Best Practice Need and Suitability Indicators
Need to prioritize lean and six sigma project according to their effects on organizational goals.
Additional Comments
This Venn Diagram highlights tools of each methodology:
TOOLS
(Examples
only)
Kaizen
Kanban
Single Minute
Exchange of
Die (SMED)
Takt Time
Poke Yoke
SIX SIGMA
PFMEA
ANOVA
Gage R&R SPC Process Simulation
Multi-Vari Analysis
Regression Analysis
DOE (Design of Experiments)
Control Plans
7 Basic Quality Tools:
Pareto
Cause & Effect
Histograms
Control Charts
Scatter Diagrams
Graphs
Check sheets
PDCA/
SDCA
7 Mgmt Tools:
Relations Diagram
Affinity Diagram
Tree Diagram
Matrix Diagram
Matrix Data-Analysis
Arrow Diagram
PDPC
LEAN
COPQ/Financial Analysis
Program Mgmt
Multi-Level
Pareto Analysis/
SIPOC
Decomposing
Project Mgmt
Metrics
Process Mapping/
GAP Analysis
Value Stream Mapping/
Voice
of the
Geographic Mapping/
Customer
Thread Diagram
QFD (Quality Function
Deployment)
Standardized Work/
Best Practices
Supplier/Customer
Performance Scorecards
Inter-Company
Kanban
CPFR
Reference Model
Organization Map
SCORcard Level One
Operational Process
Metrics Level Two
Diagnostic Metrics Level
Three
SCOR
4.1.9
SCOR
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Responsiveness
Flexibility
Costs
Asset Management
See other SCOR Best Practices and especially the Best Practices Six
Sigma and Lean Methodology for possible impacts.
None Identified
None Identified
Additional Resources
There is a Supply Chain Council Special Interest Group on this Best Practice. Please contact the group,
if you would like to contribute to the convergence of SCOR, Six Sigma and Lean Methodology.
4.1.10
SCOR
Cross Docking
Cross docking is used in many distribution centers (DC) to increase inventory velocity while
maintaining shipping efficiency. In a traditional DC, the receiving process is disjointed from
the shipping process and storage acts as an intermediary between the two processes. Cross
docking actively links the receiving and shipping processes. In a DC, both cross docking (no
storage) and traditional (with storage) operations might take place.
Cross docking minimizes the need to put incoming inventory into storage and the number
of touches for each order. To accomplish this, the receiving activity is linked with open
order status. Each inbound shipment has a planned outbound already scheduled. When an
item is received, the system will look to the open order file to find its outgoing order. The
item is moved from receiving directly to the order staging area, order pick area, or into an
outbound vehicle.
Three common types of cross docking are:
1. Trans-shipment: The order received is already packaged for delivery to the customer
Ship
A
Receive
A
Customer A
Move
B
Customer B
C
Customer C
2. Flow-through: Some sortation or break bulk is needed when the order is received
Pick
Allocate
Receive
Ship
Customer A
Customer B
Customer C
Ship
Allocate
Customer A
Customer B
Customer C
4.1.11
SCOR
SCOR Process(es)
D1.8 (Receive Product from Source or Make), D1.11 (Load Vehicle & Generate Shipping
Documentation), D1.12 (Ship Product)
Additional Comments
Suppliers usually need to make some type of investment (customized bar codes, special overpacks, or
unique pallet patterns) to participate in cross-docking.
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
None Identified
Responsiveness
None Identified
Flexibility
None Identified
Costs
Reduces transportation costs (compared to transportation without crossdock), because de-consolidation at cross-dock for multiple receivers allows
shippers to deliver larger shipments
Asset Management
None Identified
Additional Resources
None Identified
4.1.12
SCOR
Drum-Buffer-Rope Scheduling Technique
Drum-Buffer-Rope (DBR, also referred to as Synchronous Manufacturing, or Constraint
Management) is, in the Theory of Constraints (TOC), a technique used to manage resources
to maximize throughput.
The Drum is the systems constraint (or bottleneck) that sets the pace for the entire
organization. Such a bottleneck determines the final output of the system regardless of the
excess capacity that might be available on the other resources. (In DBR terminology, the
drum is also the schedule of the constraint.)
The Drum Buffer is a time offset (raw material will be released earlier than expected by the
conventional lead time) that helps exploit the drums capacity. Placing the buffer in front of
the drum we reduce/absorb the impact of uncertainty along the production chain from the
gating operations all the way to the constraint. The drum buffer can be seen as a powerful
tool in helping us prevent the drum from starving.
The Rope is the material release schedule tied to the drum. With the rope we make sure that
no material is released to the shop floor without the prior approval of the drum. The shop
floor has a virtual rope tying the drum to the gating operations, each time the drum finishes
a lot it will pull this rope to ask for more material to be released. This powerful concept
(global management vs. localized approach) has an immediate impact on both lead time
and WIP. Release only what is needed when it is needed!
SCOR Process(es)
M1.1 (Schedule Production Activities), M2.1 (Schedule Production Activities), M3.2 (Schedule
Production Activities)
Best Practice Need and Suitability Indicators
t
t
t
t
Additional Comments
In the application of Drum-Buffer-Rope (DBR), the effectiveness of the pace setting operation (drum)
is critical for maximizing throughput. The Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) is the single metric
that reflects that effectiveness. OEE is the result of multiplying
t Availability (up-time)
Run time divided by scheduled time (also 1 minus downtime)
t Quality Rate (first pass yield)
First-pass good units produced divided by total units produced
t Performance Efficiency
Theoretical cycle time by the actual cycle time. Theoretical cycle time should be that, which was
promised by the production equipments manufacturer. (In practice theoretical cycle time often
is downgraded by industrial engineers applying factors such as personal fatigue and delay
to derive a standard cycle time, which is used to cost the product and provide planning an
attainable capacity quantity.)
Copyright 2008 Supply Chain Council Inc.
4.1.13
SCOR
Additional Comments cont.
The difference between the OEE value and 1.0 indicates the percentage of production lost to
ineffective operations. Examining the components of OEE will enable root cause analysis and direct
corrective action.
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Responsiveness
Flexibility
None Identified
Costs
Asset Management
None Identified
None Identified
Additional Resources
Cox, J. F.; Blackstone J. H. (2004): American Production and Inventory Control Society (APICS)
Dictionary, 11th edition, APICS The Educational Society for Resource Management, Alexandria, VA,
USA
Goldratt, E. M., Cox, J. (1992): The Goal A Process of Ongoing Improvement, North River Press,
Norwich, CT, USA
Spencer, M. S.; Cox, J. F. (1997): The Constraints Management Handbook, The St. Lucie Press/APICS
Series on Constraints Management.
Umble, M.; Mokshagundam L. S. (1995): Synchronous Manufacturing Principles for World Class
Excellence, Spectrum Publishing Company.
Hansen, R. C. (2002): Overall Equipment Effectiveness, Industrial Press, New York, NY, USA.
Mondher, B.-H.: Synchronous Manufacturing Quick Reference Guide, Supply Chain Strategy and
Solutions, BearingPoint, Inc.
4.1.14
SCOR
Lean Methodology
Lean is a term coined in 1990 in the book The Machine that Changed the World by MIT researchers
to describe the effectiveness and efficiency of the Toyota Production System in comparison to the
traditional mass production approach to manufacturing. Lean practices actually date back to the
early 1900s when Sakichi Toyoda introduced jidoka (autonomation) into his loom operations. The
modern understanding of lean comes from the Toyota Production System developed by Taiichi
Ohno, which was inspired by Henry Fords River Rouge moving assembly line. Lean thinking is a
focus on creating process flow through the reduction of waste. The waste reduction in production
environments is typically targeted at the seven wastes: overproduction, waiting, transportation,
inappropriate processes, inventory levels, unnecessary motion, and defects. Lean Thinking is
applicable to all processes.
The typical enabler for lean improvement is through the use of Value Stream Mapping (VSM).
VSM is the process of walking and drawing the process steps (material and information) for one
product family from beginning to end, typically within a single facility, to create a current state map.
Current state maps are designed to highlight the process flow of an item through the value stream.
Following the current state map, a future state map is created. Future state maps are then developed
to identify process improvements that eliminate waste. Finally, a detailed implementation plan is
developed to transition from the current state to the future state, typically within an 8-12 month
period. VSM can also be applied similarly across suppliers to create supply chain value stream maps.
While lean excels at improving process efficiency, there are some limitations to lean application. Lean
implementations are typically limited by the inability to systematically identify and prioritize lean
projects, measure the effects of changes on the supply chain systems bottom line, and align and
communicate activities across organizations. See the Best Practice on Convergence of SCOR, Six
Sigma and Lean Methodology to overcome this limitation.
SCOR Process(es)
affects any SCOR process
Best Practice Need and Suitability Indicators
t
t
t
t
Additional Comments
Lean is a methodology and way of thinking to transform organizations into new levels of efficiency,
supported by a toolset for executing improvement projects that reduce process cycle time and
increase process cycle efficiencies. Execution is enabled through people, and must become the
way work is done within the organization. Application of lean tools is based on the effective use of
value stream mapping. This methodology relies heavily on the ability to record all steps throughout
processes and to determine value added versus non-value added activities. Lean is a methodology
supported by a toolset that is generally limited by the inability to strategically select projects that
provide the greatest value to the overall organization.
4.1.15
SCOR
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Responsiveness
Flexibility
Lean creates process flow and allows for quick changeover between
functions, tools, and processes. Lean facilities typically have
considerable cross training, which creates highly flexible teams of
people and organizational layouts.
Costs
Asset Management
Lean typically reduces inventory levels and ensures the efficient use
of assets with regard to customer demand. Suppliers are likewise
encouraged to improve cycle efficiencies to increase their available
inventory for customers to pull from.
4.1.16
SCOR
Additional Resources
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T. (1996): Lean Thinking Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation,
Simon & Schuster, New York, NY
Suzaki, K. (1987): The New Manufacturing Challenge Techniques for Continuous Improvement,
Simon & Schuster, New York, NY
Keyte, B., Locher, D. (2004): The Complete Lean Enterprise Value Stream Mapping for Administrative
and Office Processes, Productivity Press, New York, NY
Liker, J. (2004): The Toyota Way 14 Management Principles From The Worlds Greatest Manufacturer,
McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
Marchwinski, C., Shook, J., (2004): Lean Lexicon A Graphical Glossary for Lean Thinkers, Lean
Enterprise Institute, Brookline, MA
http://www.lean.org (Lean Enterprise Institute), http://www.lean.mit.edu (Lean Aerospace Initiative),
http://www.superfactory.com (Superfactory)
4.1.17
SCOR
Merge-in-Transit
Merge-in-transit is a practice to combine items from multiple sources into a single customer
shipment. This includes items on stock in the distribution center, from which the shipment
is sent, items on stock in other distribution centers, items on stock elsewhere (e.g. at a plant
or a supplier) as well as make-to-order items. The items to be merged are cross-docked
from inbound receipt to outbound shipping (see Best Practice on Cross-Docking, type
three). Merging is usually performed in a shippers distribution center (DC) or in a carriers
terminal.
Merge-in-transit allows the shipper to reduce its inventory levels on selected items in its
DCs while still maintaining complete order integrity and reliable delivery. The practice
increases overall delivery times, though. To keep delivery reliability to customers, supply
chain information systems are required, which integrate among the shipper, its suppliers,
and its carriers.
For make-to-order (MTO) products, the order lead time should be greater than the
manufacturing lead time. Otherwise, the products should be manufactured and stocked
prior to the shipment. The point is emphasized here to ensure that the proper business
policy is adopted around defining MTO versus MTS (make-to-stock) products.
SCOR Process(es)
Customer orders require commingling of products from different sources into a single shipment
Order lead time is sufficient to allow collect products from their source locations
Additional Comments
Merge-in-transit is a Place Postponement (see Best Practice on Postponement) for parts of the
supply chain.
4.1.18
SCOR
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Responsiveness
Flexibility
Costs
None Identified
Asset Management
This practice will require the use of some type of warehouse management
system (WMS), bar code or RF scanner technology, and EDI (or some other
technology that would allow the transmission of data between supply chain
partners). It might also require the integration of MRP or other scheduling
technology with the WMS. All will need to interface with the order
management system.
Additional Resources
None Identified
4.1.19
SCOR
Postponement
Postponement (delayed differentiation) is a supply chain concept where a product is kept as
long as possible in a generic state. Differentiation of the generic product into a specific endproduct is shifted closer to the consumer by postponing identity changes, such as assembly
or packaging, to the last possible supply chain location.
This allows keeping safety stock of one generic product instead of multiple specific endproducts. Especially in cases where the split of demand into specific end-products is
uncertain, postponement with its risk pooling effect leads to less safety stock required
and to a lower risk of obsolescence of end-products. Furthermore, as less value has been
added to the generic product than to the specific end-product, less capital is bound in each
stocked unit.
There are three ways to implement postponement:
t Product postponement
Processes which let the product become differentiated (e.g. coloring, flashing an EPROM
with software) take place as late as possible.
SCOR Process(es)
S1 (Source Stocked Product) , M1 (Make to Stock), D1 (Deliver Stocked Product)
Best Practice Need and Suitability Indicators
t
t
Significant number of variants of an end product with an uncertain split of demand on variants.
Delivery time requested by customers must allow value-adding steps after receipt of
customer orders (or reliable demand forecast).
Additional Comments
Product postponement leads to economies of scale in procurement and production as well, since the
generic product will be produced in larger amounts than its variants.
4.1.20
SCOR
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
With the same safety stock, fill rate will typically increase.
Responsiveness
Flexibility
Costs
Asset Management
A lower safety stock level (without effect on fill rate) reduces fixed assets.
None Identified
Additional Resources
Cox, J. F.; Blackstone J. H. (2004): American Production and Inventory Control Society (APICS)
Dictionary, 11th edition, APICS The Educational Society for Resource Management, Alexandria, VA,
USA
Simchi-Levi, D.; Kaminsky, P.; Simchi-Levi, E. (1999): Designing and Managing the Supply Chain:
Concepts, Strategies, and Cases, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, p. 56
4.1.21
SCOR
Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP)
Sales and operations planning (S&OP) is a process to develop tactical plans that provide
management the ability to strategically direct its businesses by integrating customerfocused marketing plans for new and existing products with the management of the supply
chain.
The process brings together all the plans for the business (sales, distribution, inventory,
production, procurement) into one integrated set of plans. This set of plans typically covers
at an aggregate (product family) level a period of 8 to 18 months with monthly periods
and further years with half-year periods. S&OP is revised on a regular basis, most commonly
monthly, but at least twice a year.
The process must reconcile all supply, demand, and new-product plans at both the detail
and aggregate levels and tie to the business plan. It is the definitive statement of the
companys plans for the near to intermediate term, covering a horizon sufficient to plan for
resources and to support the annual business planning process.
Typically, Sales and Operations Planning includes four key monthly meetings:
1. Demand review (to align the sales forecasts for the next months)
2. Rough cut capacity planning review (to determine the available facilities and assess the
feasibility of the production plans)
3. Pre-top Management review (to agree upon points to be escalated to top management)
4. Top Management review (to get plans authorized, issues fixed and financial plans
committed).
SCOR Process(es)
P1 (Plan Supply Chain)
Best Practice Need and Suitability Indicators
t
t
t
t
t
Variability or misbalance in demand and/or supply, need to balance supply and demand across
the supply chain.
Conflicting measures and behavior in various departments
Inventory unbalanced across the supply chain
Asset Utilization below industry norms
Especially important if operations are to a large extend planned to forecasts
Additional Comments
None Identified
4.1.22
SCOR
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Effective S&OP plans will allocate resources such that inventory is in place at
the correct locations at the correct time so that when customer orders come
in they can be fulfilled within normal procedures/processes
Responsiveness
S&OP points out where the supply chain has lead-time issues. It raises the
visibility of lead-time problems.
Flexibility
The S&OP process makes potential issues visible early, so that changes can
be made to accommodate the dynamics of the supply chain.
Costs
In particular, S&OP helps reduce the number and impact of expedites and
rush production orders both of which have a negative impact on supply
chain costs.
Asset Management
Managers should have visibility to the plans of all departments. They should
also understand the impact of their deviations from plan on the other
departments and the enterprise as a whole. Performance to plan should be
measured. Top Management sponsorship and involvement is essential for
the success of S&OP.
Additional Resources
Civerolo, J.; Rice, D.: Sales and Operations Planning Handbook, Gray Research.
4.1.23
SCOR
Six Sigma
Six Sigma is based on a philosophy of driving for near perfect process performance (3.4
defects per million opportunities for a defect) in order to satisfy customer needs and
improve financial performance. Individuals can be trained in the various roles of Six Sigma,
including Deployment Champions, Black, Green, and Yellow Belts. These practitioners
then lead project teams made up of people from the operation through the use of the
methodology to define and solve problems.
Six Sigma improvements are enabled through a rigorous methodology referred to as DMAIC
(named for the phases of Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control). The DMAIC
methodology for problem solving utilizes both process and statistical analyses to improve
product/process quality and drive reduction of defects and variation. The methodology
generally provides a systematic way to define the problem being addressed from both a
process and financial impact perspective, identify potential factors impacting performance,
narrow to the critical few root causes of defects or variation, and then establish procedures
to implement sustained performance improvements.
A couple of apparent limitations with Six Sigma are the lack of alignment of priorities,
understanding the interdependency between projects, i.e., incremental process
improvements versus process redesign, and the lack of methods to develop future
projects once the initial hit lists (pet-pains) become exhausted. See the Best Practice on
Convergence of SCOR, Six Sigma and Lean to overcome this limitation.
SCOR Process(es)
affects any SCOR process
Best Practice Need and Suitability Indicators
t
t
Additional Comments
Six Sigma provides a standard toolset for executing improvement projects to increase product quality
and reduce defects and process variability. Execution is enabled based on the Six Sigma steps of
Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control (DMAIC). Relies heavily on statistical data gathering
and root cause analysis. Six Sigma is a toolset and generally lacks an organized method for project
identification. Training in this methodology generally requires a costly investment.
4.1.24
SCOR
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Responsiveness
Flexibility
None Identified
Costs
Asset Management
None Identified
A data warehouse (with data extracted from ERP source system) and
electronic exchange of quality data with suppliers is useful.
Additional Resources
Tennant, Geoff (2000), Six Sigma: SPC and TQM in Manufacturing and Services
Pande, Peter S., Neuman, Robert P., Cavanagh, Roland R. (2000), The Six Sigma Way: How GE,
Motorola, and Other Top Companies are Honing Their Performance
Pande, Peter S., Holpp, Lawrence (2001), What Is Six Sigma?
Snee, Ronald D., Hoerl, Roger (2002), Leading Six Sigma: A Step-By-Step Guide Based on Experience
with GE and Other Six SIGMA Companies
Eckes, George (2003), Six Sigma for Everyone
http://www.isssp.com/
International Society of Six Sigma Professionals (ISSSP)
4.1.25
SCOR
Statistical Test Count
The Statistical Test Count (STC) process is a method of validating inventory on-hand
values by physically counting and reconciling a statistical sample of the entire inventory
population. This sample is then extrapolated, which provides an indicative measure of
entire inventory population. Furthermore, with extrapolation the net and gross percentage
of error is determined.
One of the primary benefits of this process is a significant reduction in the time and
manpower required to perform an audit control over data gained with STC meets or
exceeds all requirements of both internal and external auditors. In contrast to physical
inventory and cycle count methods STC creates virtually no disruption to receiving/
shipping. Interim reporting allows for monitoring of early results.
STC provides a snapshot of piece count and inventory value accuracy level. Measurable
results on both are achieved that can be benchmarked year-to-year, facility-to-facility,
and network-to-network. Benchmarking is a proactive driver for inventory accuracy
improvement.
SCOR Process(es)
ES.4 (Manage Product Inventory), ES.5 (Manage Capital Assets), ED.4 (Manage Finished Product
Inventories), ED.5 (Manage Deliver Capital Assets)
Best Practice Need and Suitability Indicators
Statistical Test Count is particularly beneficial in high SKU count environments.
Additional Comments
The Statistical Test Count process is based on validated statistical theorems that meet independent
auditor annual inventory validation requirements.
4.1.26
SCOR
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Through constant measurement and root cause analysis, use of the STC
process promotes greater inventory accuracy to support perfect order
fulfillment.
Responsiveness
Unlike cycle count and physical inventory methods, STC does not impede
daily operations and does not require warehouse shut-down.
Flexibility
The STC process requires a low volume of counts that can be executed
during off-peak times as resource availability allows.
Costs
Asset Management
STC uses part cost and other SKU characteristics to select a statistical
sample that is indicative of the entire inventory population. STC also uses
confidence intervals and other statistical tools to manage application of the
program over time.
STC does not require high investments in technology. It can be
implemented with common spreadsheet software, for example.
Additional Resources
Statistical Test Count is currently not well documented in literature. The following books deal with
inventory accuracy in general:
Wild, T. (2004): Improving Inventory Record Accuracy: Getting your stock information right.
Brooks, R.B.; Wilson, L.W. (1995): Inventory Record Accuracy: Unleashing the Power of Cycle Counting
4.1.27
SCOR
Supplier Performance Assessment System
Assess Supplier Performance is the process of measuring actual supplier performance
against internal and/or external standards, providing feedback to achieve and maintain the
performance required to meet the customers business and/or competitive needs.
The supplier management program at a representative company has six elements:
1. Viability of supplier
Financial credit rating via D & B, Risk rating associate with overall financial health.
2. Supplier Capability
Quality of supplier deliveries in PPM for Engineering programs and Production parts
3. Dependability
On time delivery for Engineering programs and Production deliveries, number of stock
outs, average days of stock out
4. Responsiveness
Part lead time, inventory turns
5. Competitiveness
YTD part cost savings, number of parts on pull processes (JIT), electronic data exchange
6. Technical ability
Global reach, Engineering ability, Technology roadmaps
Each month, the source data is extracted from an ERP software for each supplier. A
report card is created and communicated to suppliers. Performance data is monitored by
commodity managers with the expectation that supplier responds to any variance to goals
or expected results.
This supplier performance data can be used to select suppliers for a preferred supplier
program. Preferred suppliers are given preference for all new business awards and
supporting Engineering development programs.
SCOR Process(es)
ES2 (Assess Supplier Performance)
Best Practice Need and Suitability Indicators
t
t
Additional Comments
Suppliers are an external extension of the manufacturing process. In todays competitive
environment, processes rely on dependable supply streams that react quickly to variability in
demand.
4.1.28
SCOR
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Responsiveness
Flexibility
Since new business is awarded to suppliers that perform well, suppliers are
in a continuous improvement mode.
Costs
Asset Management
A data warehouse (with data extracted from ERP source system) and
electronic exchange of performance data with suppliers is useful.
Additional Resources
None Identified
4.1.29
SCOR
Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI)
VMI is a concept for planning and control of inventory, in which the supplier has access
to the customers inventory data and is responsible for maintaining the inventory level
required by the customer. Re-supply is performed by the vendor through regularly
scheduled reviews of the on-site inventory. The on-site inventory is counted, damaged or
outdated goods are removed, and the inventory is restocked to predefined levels.
The supplier takes responsibility for the operational management of the inventory within
a mutually agreed framework of performance targets, which are constantly monitored and
updated to create an environment of continuous improvement.
Different styles of VMI agreements exist.
t Re-supply need not be on a scheduled basis. It can be more flexible to occur within
defined conditions, e.g. any day normal business hours.
t The customer can be included in the approval process: The supplier could propose a
replenishment (quantity, date) and the customer has to approve the order.
t Often (but not necessarily) VMI is combined with consignment. The supplier owns items
until they are taken from the VMI and used, i.e. items are to be paid when they are used.
SCOR Process(es)
P1, P2, P4, S1.1, S2.1, S3.3, ES.7, D1, D1.5, D1.6, D2.5, D2.6, D3.5, D3.6
Best Practice Need and Suitability Indicators
Similar to conventional MRP planning of inventory, VMI implies manual planning and control tasks,
but shifts these tasks to the supplier. This manual effort should be invested in such items, which are
valuable and for which demand is unsteady or sporadic. For less valuable items with a continuous
demand order point technique and kanban are more suitable.
Additional Comments
VMI works well, where demand and inventory data is readily available, systems are integrated, and
economies of scale exist with large customers. Jointly Managed Information (JMI) is a derivation of
VMI to use when and where VMI is not operationally or commercially practicable.
Jointly-Managed Information is the automated collection, management, and integration of POS and
inventory data into supplier inventory/materials management algorithms, independent of physical
movements into the retail channel. This achieves many of the same benefits as VMI when there exists
a free flow of information among retail channel partners, without introducing what can be sensitive
financial relations between the parties. Retail partners often cannot or will not allow a vendor to
automatically replenish them.
4.1.30
SCOR
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
VMI helps to assure the availability of items thereby helping to ensure better
on-time delivery performance as well as greater fill rates.
Responsiveness
Less time is spent waiting for items, allowing the production to operate
more smoothly and quickly. With visibility of the demand cycle, you can
agree to an official lead time, which can be reduced, and be predictable.
Kraft, for example, realized a 15-20% reduction in lead times.
Flexibility
Costs
Asset Management
None Identified
Additional Resources
http://www.cpfr.org/documents/ppt/VMI_vs._CPFR.ppt (VMI vs. CPFR)
4.1.31
SCOR
Wave Picking
Wave picking is a practice used in many DC operations to increase labor picking productivity
and reduce the labor cost per pick. In some DCs, orders are scheduled to be picked when they
are received. In contrast to that, Wave picking consolidates orders into waves where multiple
orders with similar characteristics are picked at one time. Orders can be consolidated by customer,
geography, or any other criteria that makes sense for the DC operation. In an operation where freight
consolidation for shipping is important, wave picking can help consolidate less-than-truckload (LTL)
shipments into truckload (TL) shipments.
Many times wave picking is performed in conjunction with batch picking. Batch picking aggregates
similar items across orders into a single pick. For example, assume that the DC has 15 orders each
containing Item A. In a single order pick environment, the order picker would make 15 separate trips
to the location containing Item A. In batch picking, the order picker would make 1 trip to the location
of Item A and pick 15 units. Most wave picking attempts begin with small batch picking initiatives.
The combination of batch and wave picking provides the most productivity.
Wave picking, in conjunction with batch picking, increases the total travel time for each order
picker, but the total time per item picked is reduced. This also allows the DC more flexibility when
scheduling its order picking crew. If multiple waves are picked during the day, care must be taken to
balance the number of orders across each wave as equally as possible. Waves can be planned based
upon the estimated time required to complete the wave. For example, if picker productivity is 120
units per hour and the shift consists of 10 pickers, the system can release work in 1 hour blocks to
make management more efficient. This makes the operation more predictable and measurable.
Wave picking increases DC picking and shipping productivity substantially. If managed
appropriately, customers should receive more consistent deliveries. Wave picking
SCOR Process(es)
Additional Comments
Waves must match the business environment for which they are being planned. Direct-to-consumer
businesses might schedule waves specific to days of delivery or might have a clean-up wave to catch
all next day orders not waved throughout the day.
4.1.32
SCOR
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Wave picking can increase perfect order fulfillment since there are fewer
opportunities to mis-pick product.
Responsiveness
Flexibility
Costs
Asset Management
A lower safety stock level (without effect on fill rate) reduces fixed assets.
Additional Resources
None Identified
4.1.33
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
ABC Classification
None identified
M1.4: Package
M1: Make-to-stock
M2: Make-to- Order
M1.4: Package
M1: Make-to-stock
M2: Make-to- Order
M1.3: Produce and Test
M2.3: Produce and Test
M2.4: Package
Advanced Ship
Notices Allow for Tight
Synchronization between
Source and Make Processes
4.1.34
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
None identified
None identified
Appointment Scheduling
for Pickup and Delivery of
Customer Shipments
Preventative management
Assessing Export/Import
Requirements during Time
of Product Development/
Manufacture
Multi-country Export/Import
documentation compliance
Attribute-Based Process
Planning
4.1.35
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
None identified
Automated Configuration
Management
Configuration
Automated Conformance
Monitoring And Control
Automated Conversion of
Engineering Drawings into
Product Specifications
None identified
Automated Disposition
Instructions for Returns
Based on Data Interchange
with Strategic Providers
Automated Documentation
for International Shipments
Automated Engineering
Specifications
Automated Inventory
Visibility and Planning
System to Highlight
Inventory in Excess of
Requirements
Automated Notification
of Laboratory Regarding
Sample Availability
4.1.36
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Automated Registry
of Inventory Return
Locations by Item to Speed
Identification of Proper
Return Location
None identified
Automated Replenishment
of Back Stock Based on
Minimum Stocking Levels
None identified
Automated Statistical
Process Control (SPC)
None identified
Automated Update of
Customer Excess Material
Return Transaction History
Automated Update of
Supplier Performance
Information
None identified
Automatic Customer
Payment
D4.6: Checkout
Automatic Generation /
Configuration Of Tooling /
Set-Up Instructions
Automatic Identification
M2.4: Package
M1.4: Package
M3.5: Package
4.1.37
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Automatic Notification
When to Begin and When to
Complete
Workflow/Groupware
Automatic Reservation of
Inventory and Dynamic
Sourcing of Product
for Single Shipment to
Customer
Available-to-Promise (ATP)
Pooling
None identified
Integrated inbound/outbound
transportation planning (i.e. 1st truck
destination loaded last, etc.).
Build Subassemblies to
Forecast at Highest Generic
Level in Bill of Material;
Maintain Flexibility While
Minimizing Cycle Time and
Inventory Position
None identified
4.1.38
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Build Subassemblies/
Products to Forecast at
Highest Generic Level to
Minimize Make Cycle Time
None identified
Capability to Run
Simulated Full-Stream
Supply/Demand Balancing
for What-If Scenarios
Capability Transfer to
Customer
None identified
Capability Transfer to
Organization
None identified
None identified
Carrier Agreement
4.1.39
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Carrier/Route Optimization
Based on Continuous
Movement and
Consolidation/Pooling
None identified
Cellular Manufacturing
Changeover Reduction /
Continuous Improvement
Program
Clarify in Advance
Hazardous Material
Packaging, Labeling and
Shipping Requirements
4.1.40
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Collaboration among
Operations Strategy Team
Collaborative Planning,
Forecasting, Replenishment
(CPFR)
Collaborative Planning/
Scheduling
Combine Consolidation
Needs with Other Products/
Divisions/Companies
None identified
Communicate with
Customer before the Return
to Establish What Types of
Returns Are Acceptable<!>
None identified
Comparative Analysis of
Supplier Performance is
Used in Sourcing Decisions
None Identified
Comprehensive History
of Customer Interactions
Including Order History,
Claims, Problems, Etc.
None identified
4.1.41
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Concurrent Engineering
is Used to Tightly Link
Sourcing into the Product
Development Process
Make/Buy Decision
Process (Outsourcing vs. In
Sourcing)
None identified
None Identified
None identified
Confirm Changes in
Condition Code Policies Are
Promptly Communicated to
All Employees and SupplyChain Partners.
None identified
Consideration of Suppliers
Material Availability
in Companys Supply
Resources (Including
Suppliers Production Plans
& Capability, Inventory, and
Delivery Plans)
Consignment Agreements
Are Used to Reduce Assets
and Cycle Time While
Increasing the Availability of
Critical Items
Consolidate Orders by
Customer, Source, Traffic
Lane, Carrier, Etc.
Consolidate Shipments
Through Cross Docking
- Coordinate with Other
Shipments
None Identified
Consolidation of Carriers
Consolidation of
Inbound and Outbound
Requirements
Integrated inbound/outbound
transportation planning
4.1.42
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Consolidation of Return
Carriers
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement
and Development is Driven
and Measured through the
Performance Review Process
None identified
Continuous Improvement
is Planned through Process
Reviews and Customer
Feedback
Continuous Replenishment
Programs; Vendor Managed
Inventory, Telemetry to
Automatically Communicate
Replenishment of Chemicals
Integrated demand/deployment
planning to customer location driven by
POS; Customer movement data
None identified
None Identified
Cross Training/Certification
HR/certification support
4.1.43
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Cross-Docking
CRP/VMI
Internet-enabled package/shipment
tracking
None identified
D4.6: Checkout
Customer Relationship
and Digital Linkages (XML,
EDI, Etc.) Provide Accurate
Visibility into Actual
Demand via Customer
Forecasts, Product Plans,
Production Plans, and
Inventory Positions
Customer Relationship
Management (CRM)
4.1.44
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
None identified
Defective Products
Scheduling Identifies
Next Destination (Source,
Make, or Deliver) on Return
Authorization
None identified
None identified
4.1.45
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Demand-Pull
Manufacturing, Including
Active Reduction of
Manufacturing Systems
Time and WIP Through
the Use of Demand-Pull
Mechanisms and Visual
Controls
Demand-Pull Mechanisms;
Kanban Replenishment
Signals from Stockroom,
Intermediate Products, or
Subassembly Area
None identified
Design/Upgrade Production
Equipment to Maximize
Flexibility and Avoid Line
Stoppages
None Identified
None identified
4.1.46
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Direct Connection to
Customs Clearance
Direct Transfer of
Documents to Recipient and
Forwarder
Direct Transfer of
Documents to Recipient and
Forwarder
Document Control
Documents Generated
Automatically During
Shipment Preparation.
Drum-Buffer-Rope
Scheduling Technique
4.1.47
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Dunnage Control
Dynamic Deployment
Based on Constraint Based
Planning and Optimal
Scheduling
Dynamic Location
Assignment Including Lot
Control, Zoned Picking,
Quality Assurance
Dynamic Location
Assignment Including Lot
Control, Zoned Put Away,
Quality Assurance, ABC
Frequency of Access
Dynamic Simulation of
Picking Requirements
Optimized for Labor, Cost,
and Time
None identified
None identified
4.1.48
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Efficient Consumer
Response (ECR); Quick
Response
Electronic Catalogues/Malls
None identified
Electronic Commerce
(Customer Visibility of Stock
Availability, Use of HandHeld Terminals for Direct
Order Entry, Confirmation,
Credit Approval), OnLine Stock Check and
Reservation of Inventory
M3.5: Package
None identified
Electronic Documentation
and Imaging
None identified
Electronic Matching
Between POS Data and
Store Inventory (Shelves and
Back Room)
4.1.49
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Electronic Reminders
of Possible Scheduled
Maintenance
Pull signals.
Electronic Transfer of
Shipment Information to
Finance
None identified
D3.15: Invoice
D2.15: Invoice
D1.15: Invoice
Electronically Track
Shipment from Customer to
Service Provider
None Identified
None identified
Enable Customer-Service
Representatives to
Complete the Bill Of Lading
for the Customer Including
Carrier Routing, Weight,
Description and Class to
Minimize Guesswork &
Wrong Estimates
None identified
4.1.50
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
None identified
Establish Designated
Processes for Scheduling
and Receiving Excess
Inventory
None Identified
Establishment of Criteria to
Rank Suppliers
4.1.51
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
None identified
Genealogy Tracking
None identified
Pilot by Wal-Mart. IT
Identification of Suppliers
Who Will Participate in
Kanban Programs
Identification of Suppliers
Who Will Participate in
Procurement Split (Two
or More Suppliers Sharing
Purchase Requirements)
Programs
None identified
Identification of Suppliers
Who Will Participate in
Vendor Managed Inventory
(VMI) Programs
Implement Employee
Involvement Programs
None Identified
Incorporates leading
practices such as Efficient
Consumer Response,
Collaborative Planning,
Forecasting, and
Replenishment, Vendor
Managed Inventory, and real
time point of consumption
reporting.
None Identified
Tracking, genealogy
4.1.52
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Integrated Facility
Management
None identified
Integrated Order
Management, Warehouse
Management, and
Transportation
Management Systems View
for analysis for all orders and
shipments the following
data: Logistics, Product,
Cost, GL Charging
Integrated Transportation
Visibility
Internet Exchanges
4.1.53
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Internet Ordering
None identified
Internet Pooling
(Electronic brokerage
of shipments)
Inventory Allocation
Exception Process is Clearly
Defined and Jointly Owned
by Manufacturing and Sales
None identified
None identified
Inventory Performance is
Measured at the Dollar and
Unit Levels
None identified
Utilization of transportation
management system (TMS) to manage
returns. Maximization of TMS use, both
intra and inter-company within the
supply chain.
JIT Environment
4.1.54
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
None identified
Demand-pull mechanisms
None identified
Lean Manufacturing
M1: Make-to-stock
Utilization of transportation
management system (TMS) to manage
returns. Maximization of TMS use, both
intra and inter-company within the
supply chain.
None identified
4.1.55
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Long-Term Return
Agreements / Partnerships
None identified
Maintaining Repository
of Current Regulatory
Requirements
Master Production
Scheduling Reflects
Management of Capacity
and/or Supply Constraints
None identified
None identified
4.1.56
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Measurement of Carrier
Performance for On-time
Delivery and Completeness
Measurement, Monitoring
and Adjustment of Service
or Product Installation
None identified
Merge-in-Transit
None identified
M1: Make-to-stock
M2.4: Package
M3.5: Package
M1.4: Package
Minimizing In-Process
Product (WIP)
4.1.57
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Multi-country Export/
Import documentation
compliance
None identified
Multiple Locations
Throughout Store
None identified
Notification of Existing/
Future Event or Promotions
None identified
D4.6: Checkout
Obsolete Inventory is
Reviewed at the Part
Number Level
None identified
On Demand Access of
Supplier/Source Data
On Line Document
Management and
Automated Supplier
Approval Processes Can
Reduce the Cycle Time
and Costs Associated
With Managing Supplier
Evaluations and Get Them
into the Supplier Network
Faster
ERP
None identified
4.1.58
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
On-Demand Access of
Production Information
On-Demand Access to
Available to Promise (ATP),
Production Schedules and
Inventory Status by Internal
Operations and Customers
None identified
On-Line Availability to
Supplier Financials to
Determine Potential
Supplier Viability to be
Added to Supplier Network
None identified
None identified
Optimize Packing
Optimized Supply-Chain
Processes, Optimized
Supplier Count, Supplier
and Part Rationalization
4.1.59
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
None identified
Organize to Enhance
Flexibility: Few Job
Classifications, SelfDirected Work Force, Flat
Management Structure,
Cross-Functional Work
Teams
Packaging Operation is an
Integral Part of the Overall
Production Process
None identified
M3.5: Package
M1.4: Package
M2.4: Package
M3: Engineer-to-Order
M2: Make-to- Order
M1: Make-to-stock
Paperless Production
Control
M1: Make-to-stock
None identified
Pay on Receipt
4.1.60
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Performance Expectations
and Business Rules Are
Clearly Communicated Prior
to the Initiation of Business
with the Supplier
Performance Results
that Are Compared to
Benchmarks (i.e. Capacity,
Scheduling) and Readily
Available to Employees
M1: Make-to-stock
Periodic Review of
Metrics and Strategy with
Comparisons to Industry
Benchmarks
Periodic Review of
Standards
None identified
None identified
None identified
M3: Engineer-to-Order
M1: Make-to-stock
M2: Make-to- Order
Postponement
4.1.61
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
None identified
M3.5: Package
M2.4: Package
M1.4: Package
Pre-Certify Supplier
Capability to Send Return
Products Correctly to
Minimize the Need for
Receipt Verification
Pre-Defined Manufacturing
Design Rules
Predictive Maintenance
Monitoring (Heat, Noise,
Lubrication Composition &
Vibration)
Priority-Based Inventory
Reservations, for Key
Customers, with FIFO
Allocation for All Others
None identified
Proactive Education
of Customers to Set
Expectations and Encourage
Close Working Relationships
(Knowledge of Long-Lead
Items, Visibility to Supply
Resources, Agreement on
Levels of Flexibility)
None identified
None identified
Product Design
Collaboration with
Customers
M3: Engineer-to-Order
4.1.62
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Capacity planning
M1: Make-to-stock
M2: Make-to- Order
Production Reporting/
Status
Proof of Performance
(Promotion Management)
None identified
D1.15: Invoice
D3.15: Invoice
D2.15: Invoice
None identified
None identified
4.1.63
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Rapid Reconfiguration of
Return Capacity
None identified
Rapid, Dynamic
Reconfiguration of Return
Process to Meet Demand
4.1.64
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Real-Time Optimized
Shipment Method Selection
(Air Parcel, Ground Parcel,
LTL, etc.) Based on Customer
Service Requirements
Real-Time Shipment
Tracking, (via internet)
Re-Balancing of Full-Stream
Supply/Demand on a Daily
Basis, Including SourceMake-Deliver Resources
and Requirements from
Customers Customer to
Suppliers Supplier
Receiving Equipment
and Packaging Materials
to Transfer Product Are
Planned for In Advance and
Readily Available When
Needed
M2.4: Package
M3.4: Produce and Test
M1.4: Package
M1.3: Produce and Test
Reliable Continuous
Improvement Process and
Methodology.
None identified
4.1.65
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
None identified
None identified
Responsiveness and
Flexibility Are Emphasized
By Developing Expertise in
Making Business Processes
Re-Programmable,
Re-Configurable and
Continuously Changeable
None identified
4.1.66
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
None identified
Schedule Includes
Preventative Maintenance
Program
Schedule Minimizes
Changeover Costs between
Products
None Identified
None identified
Shipment Tracking
None identified
4.1.67
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
None identified
SKU Rationalization
None identified
None identified
None identified
None identified
None Identified
Standard Operating
Procedures and
Methodology
None identified
Standards and
Measurements Aligned to
Maximize Supply Chain
Performance
Internal/external benchmarking,
industry standards, customer/supplier
alignment agreements, visibility of key
performance indicators
4.1.68
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Stocking is Completed in
Zones
None identified
Substitution
Supplier Cost of
Nonconformance Data
is Collected, Analyzed
and Used in Performance
Reporting
Supplier Certification
Programs Are Used to
Reduce (Skip Lot) or
Eliminate Receiving
Inspection
4.1.69
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Supplier Certification
Programs Can Reduce the
Cycle Time for Certifying
Existing Suppliers to Provide
New Technologies
None identified
Supplier certification
programs can reduce
the cycle time for initial
certification of New
Suppliers or Certifying
Existing Suppliers that
Wish to Provide New
Technologies
Supplier Delivery to
Production Process at Point
of Use
Supplier Development
Programs Are Used to
Get Local Suppliers to
Invest in Developing New
Technologies
None identified
Supplier Managed
Inventories with Scheduling
Interfacs to External
Supplier Systems
Supplier Performance
Assessment System
4.1.70
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Suppliers Share
Responsibility for Balancing
Supply and Demand
through Joint Service
Agreements
None identified
None identified
Supply/Demand Process
is Highly Integrated from
Customer Data Gathering
to Order Receipt, through
Production to Supplier
Request
Systematic Disposition Of
Equipment
None identified
To Address Conditions
which Cannot be
Adequately Satisfied During
the Current Planning
Period, Each Functional
Area Develops Prioritized
Recommendations for the
Subsequent Planning Period
None identified
4.1.71
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Total Preventative
Maintenance Program
Transportation Modeling
and Rate Analysis
None identified
None identified
M2.4: Package
M1.4: Package
4.1.72
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
None identified
None identified
Use of CAD/CAE
Applications to Simulate
Design, Cost and
Manufacturing Process
None identified
None identified
None identified
None identified
Utilize Concurrent
Engineering with Suppliers
to Allow Them to Provide
Engineering and Product
Performance Test Data
None identified
Utilize Concurrent
Engineering with Suppliers
to Allow Them to Provide
Engineering and Product
Performance Test Data to
Qualify as Part of Potential
Supplier Network
D3.15: Invoice
D2.15: Invoice
D1.15: Invoice
4.1.73
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Utilize Enterprise
Information Systems
Utilize Internet-Based
Freight Bidding Built Around
Shared Shipping Volume
Projections
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Utilize Web-Based
Collaboration between
Asset Manager and Repair
Sites Regarding Capacity
and Scheduling
Utilize Web-Based
Collaboration between
Customer and Service
Provider on In-Bound
Return Forecasts and Asset
Tracking
Utilize Web-Based
Collaboration to Identify
Potential New Repair Sites
Prior to Their Selection
4.1.74
SCOR
Best Practice
Definition
Process
Wave picking
4.1.75
4.1.76
GreenSCOR
Best Practice
Description/Definition
Process
ES.3
Aggregate requirements
P4.1
DR1.1, DR2.1
Balance environmental
requirements
P1.3, P3.3
Benchmark practices
Bulk Packaging
Bundle deliveries
P1.4
Collaborative environmental
management processes
ES.1
Communicate environmental
requirements
P1.4
P1.1, P1.2
P3.2
Considerations emissions in
transportation decisions
EP . 6
DR2.2
Develop environmental
performance standards.
EM.2
ES.2
SR.3, DR.3
4.2.1
GreenSCOR
Best Practice
Description/Definition
Process
Energy-efficient buildings
ES.4
ES.4
Ensure environmental
documentation
M1.6
P1, EP.8
Environmental performance
standards.
EP.1
Establish environmental
partnerships
S3.2
Establish environmental
requirements
ES.7
D1.3, D2.3
EP.5
P1
P2.2
P5.1
Identify recyclable/reusable
materials
P2.2
P5.1
M1.3, M2.3
Implement an EMS
Implement an EMS
4.2.2
GreenSCOR
Best Practice
Description/Definition
Process
D1.3, D2.3
ED.1
EM.3
M1.6
Integrate environmental
considerations
EP.1
Manage environmental
performance
EP.2
ED 8
ED.4
EP.7
P4.3, P4.4
P1
P3.4
P3.4
Minimize packaging
P2.2, P4.2
P4
4.2.3
GreenSCOR
Best Practice
Description/Definition
Process
EP.8
ED.7
M3.4
S.3.2
P2
S3.1
S3.1
P3
D1.12, D2.12,
D3.10, M1.4, M2.4,
M3.5
Reusable pallets
ES.4
D1.6, D2.6
Schedule to maximize
transportation capacity
D3.4
D1.7
D1.5
D1.7
S3.2
S3.2
4.2.4
GreenSCOR
Best Practice
Description/Definition
Process
Spill control
Spill control
ED.4
ES.4
M1.7
Supplier environmental
performance criteria
ES.2
Take-back program
ED.7
ES.8
P2
EM.5
P4.2
EM.5
S1, S2, S3
M2.2, ES.4
EM.5
EM.6
EM.6
4.2.5
4.2.6
Risk Management
Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM)
Supply chain risk management is the systematic identification, assessment and mitigation
of potential disruptions in logistics networks with the objective to reduce their negative
impact on the logistics networks performance.
A high number of potential disruptions can negatively impact supply chain performance.
Potential disruptions can either occur within the supply chain (e.g. insufficient quality,
unreliable suppliers, machine break-down, uncertain demand, etc.) and outside (e.g.
flooding, terrorism, labor strikes, natural disasters, etc.). Both are considered in an integral
three-phase approach for supply chain risk management:
Phase 1 - Risk Identification: What can go wrong? What is uncertain? Based on a
description of a supply chain with SCOR, each single process should be looked at with
regards to potential disruptions that may negatively harm the performance and which
countermeasures are already in place. Result of this phase is a list of the relevant supply
chain risks.
Phase 2 - Risk Assessment: How likely is it that a certain potential incident will occur? What
is the impact? The likelihood of occurrence and the negative impact on SCOR performance
measures of each supply chain risk should be qualitatively or quantitatively evaluated.
Result of this phase is a list of serious risks that can be visualized in a risk portfolio with the
dimension probability of occurrence and negative impact.
Phase 3 Risk Mitigation: How can the risks be controlled and monitored? Mitigation
measures (e.g. improved planning methods, alternative suppliers, response plans,
redundant infrastructure, etc.) should be evaluated for the serious risks. After having
checked the cost-efficiency of the alternative measures, the appropriate measures should
be chosen and implemented. A risk can be mitigated by deceasing the likelihood that it
will occur of by decreasing its impact if it does occur. Alternatives to mitigation include
acceptance, transfer, and risk sharing.
SCOR Process(es)
EP.9, ES.9, EM.9, ED.9, ER.9
Best Practice Need and Suitability Indicators
Supply chain risk management is suitable especially for supply chains in uncertain environments,
with low redundancies in terms of material and capacity buffers as well as high requirements on the
supply chain performance. Risk management is particularly applicable to organizations that have a
low tolerance for risk in their business strategy.
4.3.1
Risk Management
Additional Comments
Examples for typical supply chain risks are raw material shortage, supplier failures, increased
material price, machine break-down, uncertain demand, inaccurate forecasts, change orders and
transportation failure. Other risks not directly related to the supply chain are for example product
liability risk or strategy risk. Therefore supply chain risks are only a part of all business risks. Hence,
supply chain risk management should be integrated in an enterprise risk management.
For the implementation of supply chain risk management in organisations the process and
responsibilities have to be clearly defined. The resources, e.g. staff, budget, should be assigned by
the top management. The participating staff members need to be motivated and skilled.
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Responsiveness
The variability of the order fulfillment cycle time is reduced and the
recovery time from disruptions is shortened.
Flexibility
Due to the proactive proceeding the supply chain is better prepared for
sudden changes and thus more flexible.
Costs
Asset Management
4.3.2
Risk Management
Additional Resources
Brindley, C. (ed.) (2004): Supply Chain Risk A Reader. Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Handfield, R., Blackhurst, J., Craighead, C.W. (2007): Supply Chain Risk Management: Minimizing
Disruptions in Global Sourcing. CRC press.
Modarres, M. (2006): Risk Analysis in Engineering Techniques, Tools, and Trends. Taylor & Francis.
Sheffi, Y. (2005): The Resilient Enterprise Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage. The
MIT Press.
Ziegenbein, A. (2007): Supply Chain Risk Identification, Assessment and Mitigation. vdf
Hochschulverlag Zrich (in German).
(2004) A Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge. PMBOK guide Project Management
Institute, Inc
(2002). Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition Defense Acquisition University US
Department of Defense.
There is a Supply Chain Council Special Interest Group on Risk Management in SCOR model. Please
contact the group at [email protected], if you would like to contribute to this topic.
4.3.3
Risk Management
Supply Chain Risk Identification
A key aspect of supply chain risk management is identification. Identification involves
creating a list of potential events that could harm any aspect of the supply chains
performance. Risk identification allows an organization to take steps to create plans to
manage risks before they occur. This is typically more cost effective then waiting to react to
adverse events when they occur.
Some methods for identifying risk are:
t Looking at historical problems Historical problems may have a high chance of
recurring. Those problems may have happened to the organization itself or to others.
t Researching industry trends Other organizations and industry groups may have
already researched risks that are applicable.
t Group of experts brainstorming People with experience in different areas of your
organization and supply chain have lots of knowledge of risks. Getting them together
increases the knowledge sharing.
t Supply chain mapping Visual maps of supply chains reveal supply chain structures,
dependencies, and handoffs that may contain risk. SCOR mapping and Value Stream
Mapping are two types of supply chain mapping that can be used.
t Assessment surveys Well designed surveys can be an effective way to quickly gather
information on risks in your supply chain.
t Site visits Site visits to supply chain partners allow you to collect detailed and less
filtered information on risks.
t Information audits Data system audits can reveal issues and trends from the past. It
can show areas of the supply chain that have had poor performance in the past and are
thus more likely to perform poorly in the future.
t Delphi method
t Risk checklists
t cause-effect-diagrams and
t critical path method
SCOR Process(es)
EP.9, ES.9, EM.9, ED.9, ER.9
Best Practice Need Indicators
Any organization interested in managing risks must first identify them.
4.3.4
Risk Management
Additional Comments
In the Plan step of SCOR, an organization can create plans for identifying risk on an ongoing basis.
Risks can be classified into Source Risks, Make Risks, Deliver Risks, and Return risks.
t Source risk identification Standardized source assessments and surveys are effective. Some
companies have already developed such assessments.
t Make risk identification Internal risks to an organization that have been extensively studied
and include: Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance; fiscal, environmental, and social responsibility; health
and labor laws; loss of manufacturing capability (due to labor loss, property loss, ...); quality
management; increases in production costs; link to source risks (interruptions and increases in
costs); capacity (over and under); intellectual property; and personnel management.
t Deliver risk identification Visibility of customers improves the ability to identify Deliver risks.
t Return risk identification Data on returns needs to be tracked to identify risks. Excessive returns
may reveal risks earlier in the process.
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Identifying risk is the first step towards reducing the potential for risk which
increases the reliability of the supply chain.
Responsiveness
None Identified
Flexibility
None Identified
Costs
None Identified
Asset Management
None Identified
Non Identified
Non Identified
Additional Resources
(2004) A Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge. PMBOK guide Project Management
Institute, Inc
(2002). Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition Defense Acquisition University US Department
of Defense.
Hoeft, S., Davey M., Newsome, D., (May-June 2007) Proactively Managing Risk: The New Waste.
Defense AT&L.
4.3.5
Risk Management
Supply Chain Risk Monitoring
Once areas of risk have been identified, an organization needs to monitor their internal and
external environment. This helps them to predict when risky events are becoming more
likely. It also helps to identify new risks and is tightly linked to the best practice of Supply
Chain Risk Identification.
SCORs focus on supply chain metrics enables Supply Chain Risk monitoring. Real time
metrics and periodic reports give decisions makers knowledge upcoming risks. Statistical
analysis of key metrics can reveal trends. Visibility into supplier and customer metrics
increases the ability to monitor. Reports on risk monitoring can be combined with existing
management reviews and meetings.
Monitoring can also include monitoring qualitative sources of information such as news or
weather reports to identify events that are precursors to risks.
In the Plan step, an organization can plan methods for monitoring Source, Make, Deliver,
and Return risks. These methods may include specific metrics to monitor and watch-out
lists of precursor events. It may also include monitoring the environment external to the
organizations supply chain.
t Deliver risk monitoring can be done with customer service metrics.
t Make risk monitoring can be done automatically through an organizations data systems
such as an ERP system.
t Source risk monitoring is enhanced with visibility into suppliers metrics.
It is important to monitor indicators that would appear early in a risk event or, better, even
before it occurs by indicating an increasing likelihood. If monitoring only reveals a risk well
after its first occurrence, it will likely be too late to adequately respond to it.
Monitoring can also be used to test the effectiveness of risk controls. If a plan to mitigate
or prevent a risk has been implemented, monitoring can check to see if the corresponding
metrics show no signs of the risk occurring.
SCOR Process(es)
EP.9, ES.9, EM.9, ED.9, ER.9
Best Practice Need Indicators
Risk monitoring is used when an organization desires to be proactive in risk mitigation and take
actions prior to an actual risk occurrence.
Additional Comments
None Identfied
4.3.6
Risk Management
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Responsiveness
None Identified
Flexibility
None Identified
Costs
Asset Management
None Identfied
Additional Resources
None Identified
4.3.7
Risk Management
Supply Chain Risk Assessment
Supply Chain Risk assessment provides management with an understanding of where the
greatest risks may exist in order to prioritize resources for risk mitigation and management.
Performing such assessments will involve clarifying the nature of the risk, understanding
conditions that may lead to the event, knowing how frequently such events have happened
or can be expected to happen, and the potential impact of such events. The team can then
prioritize addressing the risks.
t
t
t
t
Impact
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Probability
t
4.3.8
Risk Management
A risk assessment tool in the form of qualitative and quantitative spreadsheet which can be
used by management teams to organize the assessment of risks to an organization. The tool
can contain also contain information on relevant causes of those risks and their assessment,
mitigation options and the impact of various mitigation plans. This helps establish standards
for the measurement, reporting, and limiting of risk. The tool can contain risk categories
from other known best practices such as COSO.
SCOR Process(es)
EP.9, ES.9, EM.9, ED.9, ER.9
Best Practice Need Indicators
Risk assessment is a tool for quantifying the potential impact of supply chain disruptions and is a key
tool for prioritizing mitigation activities. Risk assessment should be used to increase the veracity of a
supply chain risk management program and better support resource allocations.
Additional Comments
Risk management is widely discussed, but practitioners have differing views of the categories,
significance, and how to integrate mitigation plans into the overall project or operational plan. A
frequent issue is that management focuses on the highest impact risks, overlooking more frequent
occurrences. This tool should help standardize risk management vocabulary and practices within an
organization. Can help embed risk management in the operating and project plan.
A best practice is to have project teams update the assessment/ plan as complete project milestones,
such as file permits, FEL3,etc. Keeps risk mitigation plan integrated with overall project, such as by
eliminate risk mitigation plans which as no longer pertinent.
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Good risk assessments will identify the most significant risks to be mitigated
and, therefore, decrease the likelihood of disruptions to reliability.
Improves reliability by facilitating risk mitigation plans.
Responsiveness
None Identified
Flexibility
Good risk assessments will identify the most significant risks to be mitigated
and, therefore, increase the ability to increase flexibility.
Costs
Good risk assessments will identify the most significant risks to be mitigated
and, therefore, best allocate cost resources to mitigate risks.
Improves cost control by identifying factors which can costs to exceed
forecast, and by facilitating risk mitigation plans.
Asset Management
None Identified
4.3.9
Risk Management
Key Best Practice Success Factors
Technology Features
Procedure for use of this Best Practice in the context of the firms vocabulary
and policies.
Standard assessment criteria
Training on that procedure for management, risk assessment professionals,
and supply chain professionals.
Additional Resources
(2004) A Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge. PMBOK guide Project Management
Institute, Inc
(2002). Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition Defense Acquisition University US Department
of Defense.
Hoeft, S., Davey M., Newsome, D., (May-June 2007) Proactively Managing Risk: The New Waste.
Defense AT&L.
Failure Mode and effect analysis.
Enterprise Risk Management Integrated Framework. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (COSO)
4.3.10
Risk Management
Sourcing Risk Mitigation Strategies
For most manufacturing operations, over 70% of cost is associated with purchased
goods and services. These organizations may identify some goods or services as posing
unacceptable supply risk, in case of suppliers business rationalization, excessive demand,
fire, work outage, etc This best practice identifies some Risk Mitigation strategies.
Source risk mitigation strategies can include:
t Multiple sources of supply
t Strategic agreements with suppliers
t Supplier partnerships
t CPFR
t Joint product design and delivery
t Etc.
SCOR Process(es)
EP.9, ES.9
Best Practice Need Indicators
This practice fits well with companies that have a few, significant supplier or a supplier base that
is constrained or powerful. It also is useful of the supplier base or the raw materials purchased are
inherently high risk.
Additional Comments
None Identified
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Responsiveness
None Identified
Flexibility
None Identified
Costs
Asset Management
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Additional Resources
Various Institute for Supply Management (ISM), other documents.
4.3.11
Risk Management
Crisis Communications Planning
Open communication is necessary for effective risk management, where the term open
refers to the possibility to directly reach the right person who can better handle the
information about a crisis situations wherever in the organization (i.e. refer to the NokiaEricssons case in Sheffi, 2005).
Managers require direct communication channels up, down and across their business units
to help identify risks and take appropriate actions.
The communication should also be fast and reliable: suitable methods of communication
(from phone call to e-mail messages or even more advanced means) and redundant
communication capabilities should be identified.
Periodic reports shared within the partners of the supply chain can definitively help in
coordinating efforts related to risk management activities and initiatives.
SCOR Process(es)
EP.9, ES.9, EM.9, ED.9, ER.9
Best Practice Need Indicators
Open crisis communication is needed when a coordinated response is needed to prevent or respond
to supply chain disruptions.
Additional Comments
This practice aims at smoothing the problems due to lack of communication within companys
functions or within different companies among the supply chain.
Establishing an open, reliable and fast communication channel means allow people to work with the
right information in the right place at the right time, in order to ensure coordinated Risk Management
activities
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Responsiveness
Flexibility
It can help during planning activities providing the most valued information
to decision makers within the whole supply chain
Costs
Asset Management
None Identified
4.3.12
Risk Management
Key Best Practice Success Factors
Technology Features
t
t
t
Additional Resources
Best Practices in Risk Management: Private and Public Sectors Internationally Treasury Board
of Canada Secretariat. Accessed on 10/25/2007 at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/dcgpubs/
RiskManagement/rm-pps1_e.asp
Sheffi, Y. (2005): The Resilient Enterprise Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage. The
MIT Press.
4.3.13
Risk Management
Risk Management Programs Coordination with Partners
The process of coordinated risk management places a strong emphasis on cooperation
among departments within a single company and among different companies of a supply
chain to effectively manage the full range of risks as a whole. A closer coordination of risk
management activities performed throughout the supply chain is intended to conserve
resources and increase effectiveness.
The adoption of a common process framework within the supply chain can foster the share
of information in order to improve existing initiatives and removal duplicated or ineffective
activities. Moreover, sharing business continuity programs with supply-side and customerside partners, can help in identifying overlapping areas or uncovered issues.
Risk Management coordination could be achieved by the establishment of a Risk
Management Coordination Committee, whose purpose is advises and coordinates the
identification and inclusion of risk management treatments within the overall risk
management process (see, Comcover reference)
This practice is at the basis of the shared risk approach.
SCOR Process(es)
EP.9, ES.9, EM.9, ED.9, ER.9
Best Practice Need Indicators
Coordinated risk management is essential in situations where a significant amount of potential risk
lies outside of the subject organizations control, e.g., in other business units, upstream in supplier
supply chains, or downstream in customer supply chains. In these cases, risk is best mitigated
through close coordination with partners that can directly act on the potential risks.
Additional Comments
One important pre-requisite of coordinated risk management is that supply-side partners should be
seen from a collaborative rather than a competitive viewpoint. This in order to share best practices,
recovery objectives, strategy information, expectations and mutual aid options.
In order to identify critical suppliers, it is possible to send them surveys regarding their business
continuity programs. Recurring meetings (some face-to-face) can lead to decreased availability risk
and far-greater levels of business continuity program maturity for both organizations.
Another important pre-requisite is an appropriate visibility into customer events (i.e. inventory level,
sales volume, demand forecasts). This is intended to allow for early detection of risky situations or
conditions.
4.3.14
Risk Management
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Coordinated action will reduce the potential for overall supply chain
disruption and, therefore, provide a better ability to deliver product reliably.
Responsiveness
Flexibility
Costs
By sharing common activities within the supply chain and removing useless
or ineffective process, this practice can contribute to cost reduction
Asset Management
None Identified
Additional Resources
Comcovers Awards for Excellence in Risk Management 2004: National Capital Authority. Australian
Government Comcover. Accessed on 10/25/2007 at: http://www.finance.gov.au/COMCOVER/
docs/2004_NCA.pdf
4.3.15
Risk Management
Supply chain business rules configured to mitigate risk
This practice involves establishing business rules (e.g., customer priority, supplier priority,
production routing, transportation routing, etc.) based on minimizing the risk to the supply
chain. Under this practice, business rules are established or configured in response to the
corporate risk management plan with a goal of reducing either the likelihood of a disruption
occurring or the impact to the supply chain should a disruption occur.
Business rule reconfiguration typically includes an assessment of the impact of each rule
change on the overall supply chain before actual implementation.
SCOR Process(es)
EP.9, ES.9, EM.9, ED.9, ER.9
Best Practice Need Indicators
This practice is useful in organizations where the cost of supply chain disruptions is high, either from
a profit or brand image perspective. Using a risk mitigation configuration will reduce the potential for
a disruption and reduce the recovery time after a disruption occurs.
Additional Comments
None Identified
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Designing rules for risk mitigation will reduce the potential for a supply
chain disruption improving the overall reliability of delivery. In addition,
business rules can keep redundancy in the supply chain to further ensure
reliability.
Responsiveness
Flexibility
By designing rules for mitigating risk, the supply chain is better constructed
to redirect capacity in the event of a node failure. This capability will
increase flexibility.
Costs
Designing rules for risk mitigation reduces the costs associated with a
disruption by providing existing plans for disruption response.
Asset Management
Designing rules for risk mitigation reduces the costs associated with a
disruption by providing existing plans for disruption response.
None Identified
None Identified
Additional Resources
None Identified
4.3.16
Risk Management
Supply chain information configured to minimize risk
This practice involves managing supply chain information networks to minimize the risk
to the supply chain. This includes information sharing with partners as well as internal
locations. This helps all parties to be quickly informed of a real or potential disruption and
respond quickly and appropriately to minimize the disruption impact.
To be effective, this practice needs to include clear identification of what information each
supply chain partner needs in order to reduce the overall risk in the supply chain and
agreement on information sharing details:
t Formats
t Frequencies
t Technologies
t Processes
SCOR Process(es)
EP.9, ES.9, EM.9, ED.9, ER.9
Best Practice Need Indicators
This practice is useful in organizations where the cost of supply chain disruptions is high, either from
a profit or brand image perspective. Using a risk mitigation configuration will reduce the potential for
a disruption and reduce the recovery time after a disruption occurs.
Additional Comments
None Identified
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Sharing risk information across the supply chain will minimize the disruption
response time and ensure reliable delivery of products and services.
Responsiveness
Sharing information will minimize disruption response time and speed the
delivery of products and services following a disruption.
Flexibility
Having set information sharing processes place will speed the response to
demand fluctuations and other disruptions improving the flexibility of the
supply chain.
Costs
None Identified
Asset Management
None Identified
None Identified
Additional Resources
None Identified
4.3.17
Risk Management
Supply chain network configured to mitigate risk
This practice relies on a risk evaluation of the supply chain to guide the design of the supply
chain network. Node locations, transportation routes, capacity size and location, number of
suppliers, number of production locations, etc. are all determined in a fashion that mitigates
potential disruptions to the ability to deliver product and service to the end customer.
This practice relies on the information collected through risk identification and risk
assessment processes to identify nodes that are at a high risk of disruption due to the
location of the node. Location specific risks can include tactical strike risks, natural disaster
risks, single point of failure risks, etc.
SCOR Process(es)
EP.9, ES.9, EM.9, ED.9, ER.9
Best Practice Need Indicators
This practice is useful in organizations where the cost of supply chain disruptions is high, either from
a profit or brand image perspective. Using a risk mitigation configuration will reduce the potential for
a disruption and reduce the recovery time after a disruption occurs.
Additional Comments
This practice generally involves making significant changes to the supply chain. The changes tend
to be very difficult and expensive to undo, therefore, great care should be taken in reconfiguring the
supply chain network.
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Designing for risk mitigation will reduce the potential for a supply chain
disruption improving the overall reliability of delivery
Responsiveness
Flexibility
Costs
Designing for risk mitigation reduces the costs associated with a disruption
by locating inventory and other assets outside of high risk geographic areas.
Asset Management
Designing for risk mitigation reduces the costs associated with a disruption
by locating assets outside of high risk geographic areas.
4.3.18
Risk Management
Key Best Practice Success Factors
Technology Features
A risk enabled supply chain network will often rely on network modeling
as well as electronic order routing and EDI links between facilities and
partners.
This practice will be most successful when coupled with other risk
management practices such as coordinated programs and visibility of risks.
Additional Resources
None Identified
4.3.19
Risk Management
Sourcing Opportunities Prioritization to Improve Cost & Security of Supply
Many businesses need to improve performance through reliable Sourcing of more costeffective supplies & services to meet customers needs and growth opportunities. This Best
Practice covers strategic sourcing approaches for reducing Total Cost of Ownership, and
simultaneously assessing supply risk in case of business rationalization, excessive demand,
fire, work outage, etc
SCOR Process(es)
ES.9, EP.9
Best Practice Need Indicators
For organizations which use goods and services in a variety of uses, making it more difficult to
determine which goods and services deserve priority for cost improvements and risk mitigation.
Additional Comments
None Identified
Impact on Supply Chain Performance Attributes/Metrics
Attribute
Experienced Impact
Reliability
Responsiveness
None Identified
Flexibility
None Identified
Costs
Asset Management
None Identified
Data from ERP system on goods and services and where used. Data form
ERP system on revenues associated with specific offerings where above
goods and services are used.
Management support.
Additional Resources
Strategic sourcing references on demand identification, ABC and Risk Analysis, Stakeholders analysis,
and demand segregation per the training materials.
4.3.20
Section 5
Special Applications
GreenSCOR
Introduction
Sustainable business models and environmental accounting are growing business concerns.
However, there are multiple approaches to measuring the total environmental footprint of
an organization or supply chain with no agreed upon standards. The SCOR Model, which is a
proven framework for defining supply chain scope and process operations as well as measuring
supply chain performance, provides an excellent foundation for environmental accounting in
the supply chain.
In that regard, the Supply Chain Council is proposing a set of strategic environmental metrics
that can be added to the SCOR Model to effectively allow the SCOR Model to be used as a
framework for environmental accounting. The proposed metrics are listed in the table below.
Metric
Units
Basis
Carbon
Emissions
Tons CO2
Equivalent
Air Pollutant
Emissions
Tons or kg
Liquid Waste
Generated
Tons or kg
Solid Waste
Generated
Tons or kg
% Recycled
waste
Per cent
These five metrics can be measured for each of the SCOR Level 3 processes and then aggregated
to create a Level 2 and Level 1 metric. These metrics are readily available for most organizations.
Environmental agencies and industry associations have developed emissions factors based on
process throughput, energy consumption, etc. for calculating these emissions. Alternatively
emissions values can be directly collected through monitoring programs or common documents
(e.g., regulatory reports, waste shipping documents, environmental permits, etc.).
By adding these metrics to the SCOR Model, an organization can use the existing SCOR based
methods for defining supply chain scope and configuration. Once that process is complete,
these metrics allow for targeted, structured data collection and calculation of metrics which
ultimately provide a total view of supply chain environmental performance. The figure below
illustrates the aggregation of these metrics along the SCOR process structure.
5.1.1
GreenSCOR
Total Carbon Footprint
Air+Liquid+Solid-% Recyc=Total Environmental Footprint
Level 1
Tier 3
S1
Level 2
Tier 1
M1
M1
D1
S1
Your Company
S1
M1
D1
S1
M1
Customer
D1
D1
S1
Level 3
Tier 2
D1
M2.1
M2.2
M2.3
Schedule
production
Activities
Issue
Product
Produce
and Test
Carbon
Air
Liquid
Solid
% Recyc
Carbon
Air
Liquid
Solid
% Recyc
Carbon
Air
Liquid
Solid
% Recyc
M2
D2
S2
Carbon
Air
Liquid
Solid
% Recyc
M2.4
M2.5
M2.6
Package
Stage
Product
Release
Product to
Deliver
Carbon
Air
Liquid
Solid
% Recyc
Carbon
Air
Liquid
Solid
% Recyc
Carbon
Air
Liquid
Solid
% Recyc
Using the SCOR Model as an environmental accounting framework has additional benefits as
well. First, the framework clearly ties the various emissions to the originating processes. This
provides a structure for not just measuring performance, but identifying where action can be
taking to improve performance.
Second, the hierarchal nature of the SCOR Model allows for strategic environmental footprint
goals to be easily translated to targets in specific activities. Likewise, when strategic goals are
not being met, the framework provides a structure for root cause analysis as well as end-to-end
supply chain optimization around environmental performance.
Lastly, as with other SCOR Model metrics, these metrics have clear definitions and a tie to process
activities that provide a foundation for effective benchmarking. This capability allows companies
to compare environmental performance of their supply chain using the same methods currently
used for comparing business performance. Through benchmarking, managers can go beyond
measuring environmental performance and understand that performance in the context of
their industry peers performance.
The remainder of this appendix details these environmental metrics and their decomposition
levels in the same format used elsewhere in the SCOR Model.
The Supply Chain Council believes that this metrics structure provides an effective tool for
environmental supply chain accounting. However, this approach is not currently in use, and,
therefore, these metrics are not included as fully approved SCOR metrics. Please provide feedback
to the Supply Chain Council on the effectiveness of this metrics structure as it is applied to your
supply chain operations.
5.1.2
GreenSCOR
Performance Attribute: Supply Chain Costs
Total Supply Chain Carbon Footprint
The sum of the carbon equivalent emissions associated with the SCOR Level 2 processes to
Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, and Return.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
5.1.3
GreenSCOR
Performance Attribute: Supply Chain Costs
Plan Carbon Emissions
Process Number: P1, P2, P3, P4, P5
The sum of carbon emissions associated with Plan.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
5.1.4
GreenSCOR
Performance Attribute: Supply Chain Costs
Source Carbon Emissions
Level 1
^
Level 2
Level 3
Data Collection
Carbon emissions are generally calculated using emission factors such as those created by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Environmental Research Laboratory, and various
industry associations. The emission factors are generally based on energy consumption, fuel type and
consumption, or process throughput. Alternatively, actual emissions can be monitored from discrete
sources .
Discussion
Often, energy consumption will have to be allocated to various processes based on factors such as
square footage, unit volume, revenue, or other factors.
5.1.5
GreenSCOR
Performance Attribute: Supply Chain Costs
Make Carbon Emissions
Level 1
^
Level 2
Level 3
5.1.6
GreenSCOR
Performance Attribute: Supply Chain Costs
Deliver Carbon Emissions
Process Number: D1, D2, D3
The sum of the carbon emissions associated with Deliver and/or Install
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
^
Level 2
Level 3
Customer Management
Sales order management = inquiry & quotations + order entry & maintenance + channel
management + order fulfillment + distribution + transportation + outbound freight and duties +
installation + customer invoicing / accounting + new product release / phase-in + etc.
Customer Management = financing + post-sales customer service + handling disputes + field
repairs + enabling technologies + etc.
Data Collection
Carbon emissions are generally calculated using emission factors such as those created by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Environmental Research Laboratory, and various
industry associations. The emission factors are generally based on energy consumption, fuel type and
consumption, or process throughput. Alternatively, actual emissions can be monitored from discrete
sources .
Discussion
Often, energy consumption will have to be allocated to various processes based on factors such as
square footage, unit volume, revenue, or other factors.
5.1.7
GreenSCOR
Performance Attribute: Supply Chain Costs
Return Carbon Emissions
Process Number: SRx, DRx
The sum of the carbon emissions resulting from returning a product to the supplier.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
^
Level 2
Level 3
Cost to Return to Source (SRx) = Verify Defective Product Emissions + Disposition of Defective
Product Emissions + Identify MRO Condition Emissions + Request MRO Return Authorization
Emissions + Schedule MRO Shipment Emissions + Return MRO Product Emissions + etc.
Cost to Return From Customer (DRx) = Authorization Emissions + Schedule Return Emissions +
Receive Emissions + Authorize MRO Return Emissions + Schedule MRO Return Emissions + Receive
MRO Return Emissions + Transfer MRO Product Emissions + etc.
Data Collection
Carbon emissions are generally calculated using emission factors such as those created by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Environmental Research Laboratory, and various
industry associations. The emission factors are generally based on energy consumption, fuel type and
consumption, or process throughput. Alternatively, actual emissions can be monitored from discrete
sources .
Discussion
Often, energy consumption will have to be allocated to various processes based on factors such as
square footage, unit volume, revenue, or other factors.
5.1.8
GreenSCOR
Performance Attribute: Supply Chain Costs
Total Supply Chain Environmental Footprint
The sum of the air, liquid, and solid waste emissions associated with the SCOR Level 2 processes
to Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, and Return.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
5.1.9
GreenSCOR
Performance Attribute: Supply Chain Costs
Total Supply Chain Air Emissions
The sum of the Air emissions associated with the SCOR Level 2 processes to Plan, Source,
Make, Deliver, and Return.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
^
Level 2
Level 3
5.1.10
GreenSCOR
Performance Attribute: Supply Chain Costs
Total Supply Chain Liquid Emissions
The sum of the Liquid emissions associated with the SCOR Level 2 processes to Plan, Source,
Make, Deliver, and Return.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
^
Level 2
Level 3
Discussion
Often, a supply chain represents partial use of a facility, production line, vehicle, etc. Therefore, the
emissions from this infrastructure must be apportioned based on the proportional use of the supply
chain.
5.1.11
GreenSCOR
Performance Attribute: Supply Chain Costs
Total Supply Chain Solid Waste Emissions
The sum of the solid waste emissions associated with the SCOR Level 2 processes to Plan,
Source, Make, Deliver, and Return.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
^
Level 2
Environmental Protection Agency, National Environmental Research Laboratory, and various industry
associations. The emission factors are generally based on process throughput. Alternatively, actual
emissions can be monitored from discrete sources.
Discussion
Often, a supply chain represents partial use of a facility, production line, vehicle, etc. Therefore, the
emissions from this infrastructure must be apportioned based on the proportional use of the supply
chain.
5.1.12
GreenSCOR
Performance Attribute: Supply Chain Costs
Total Supply Chain % Recycled
The portion of the solid waste effectively recycled or reused associated with the SCOR Level 2
processes to Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, and Return.
Hierarchical Metric Structure
Level 1
^
Level 2
Level 3
Make % Recycled
Deliver % Recycled
Return % Recycled
5.1.13
5.1.14