City Center Retail Report
City Center Retail Report
City Center Retail Report
Downtown Durham, Inc., City of Durham Office of Economic & Workforce Development, and Parrish Street Advocacy
Committee would like to thank the following people and organizations that made the City Center Retail Strategy possible:
Funding
City of Durham
Office of Economic and Workforce Development
Parrish Street Advocacy Committee
Consultant Team
Heather Arnold
Retail Compass LLC
11 Trail House Ct.
Rockville, Maryland 20850
301.461.8520
http://www.retailcompass.com/
Herb Heiserman
The Heiserman Group
4962 Fairmont Avenue
Bethesda, MD 20814
301.654.4301
Abigail Ferretti
Partners for Economic Solutions
349 Cedar Street
Washington, DC 20012
202.621.9103
A final special thanks to all those who took the time to speak with the
consultant team, including: current downtown retailers, commercial brokers,
and property owners.
Page 1
Page 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Road to a Retail Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Introduction
City Center Retail History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Retail 101
Retail Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Class of Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
What Do Retailers Need? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Retail Market Analysis
Supply Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retail Readiness of Ground-Level Spaces
Retail Readiness of Public Infrastructure
Demand Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Resident-Based Demand
Worker-Based Demand
Visitor-Based Demand
Cumulative Retail Demand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Incremental Demand Forecast by Development Type . . . . . . . .
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
30
34
14
17
Conclusion
Appendix
Page 3
Page 4
Kevin Dick
Director
Office of Economic &
Workforce Development
City of Durham
Chuck Watts
Chairman
Parrish Street Advocacy Group
Page 5
Page 6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Historically, City Center was the retail heart of Durham. A series of events, demographic shifts and changing local
shopping habits have resulted in the deterioration of its retail environment. This document is one component of the
effort to regenerate storefronts inside the Loop.
Retail spaces, particularly in mixed-use, urban environments, generally endure for decades if not longer. The tenants in
these spaces will most likely change many times. As a result, the sustainability of City Centers retail environment will be
determined primarily by the quality of its ground-level, retail-appropriate locations.
Within City Center, 112 ground-level, retail-appropriate locations were surveyed and recorded. This total included
39 retail-occupied and 83 retail-appropriate spaces that are currently vacant or occupied by a non-retail use.
The total amount of space currently occupied by retail establishments is approximately 64,949 square feet.
Too few people reside within City Centers primary customer trade area to generate a measurable amount of retail
demand.
The secondary and tertiary residential trade areas generate demand for approximately 45,000 square feet of retail. The
workforce population contributes an additional 15,000 square feet of estimated retail demand. Visitors to City Center
and the immediately surrounding area account for an estimated 21,000 square feet of retail demand.
Unmet retail demand for City Center totals approximately 16,100 square feet. This figure is distributed among
Neighborhood Goods & Services (3,100 square feet), Food & Beverage (11,300 square feet) and General Merchandize,
Apparel, Furnishings & Other (1,700 square feet).
As the unmet demand figures illustrate, the Food & Beverages retail category has the greatest amount of sales
potential within City Center by a wide margin. Neighborhood Goods & Services has enough unmet demand to support
approximately two additional stores, given City Centers current primary trade area figures. GAFO retail demand for City
Center is statistically satisfied.
The City Center Retail Strategy has three major components:
1) To invigorate and sustain retail growth that will revitalize sidewalks and storefronts, City Centers retail environment
must focus stores and restaurants into three retail nodes, at Five Points, West Main Street and Orange Street/East
Chapel Hill Street. 2) The retail encouraged within these districts must be destination-driven and market-appropriate. 3)
The timeline for measuring the successful implementation of this strategy must take a long-term outlook.
A central theme of this Retail Strategy is the creation of a Culinary Arts District encompassing all of downtown Durham,
including City Centers three retail nodes.
Page 7
INTRODUCTION
In recent years, a handful of new restaurants have opened in City
Center. A few service retailers continue to attract customers from
the local workforce. The list of tenants interested in a City Center
location is growing. These promising first steps prompted new
questions: How can disparate retail progress be channeled into
real momentum? What has been holding back City Centers retail
potential?
This City Center Retail Strategy was created to address those
questions, using the following steps:
Study the history of City Centers retail market and environment
to better understand its present condition.
Identify obstacles to continued retail growth. Investigate the
adequacy of public infrastructure and locations for potential
retail, the willingness of the local customer market to generate
City Center retail demand, the effectiveness of incentive
programs, the role of the local commercial brokerage community,
and coordination between retail tenants and landowners.
Recommend a comprehensive approach to maximize City
Centers retail potential. Identify specific steps to address
impediments. Assign responsible parties and priority levels to
each task.
As this document will illustrate, a myriad of small, incremental and
cumulative actions brought City Centers retail environment to its
current state. Many similarly scaled tasks are necessary to realize
its full potential. The path to a City Center known as place to dine
and window shop, a pleasant place to stroll, an area to show outof-town visitors, a location for new businesses, and a symbol of the
Durham community consists of a thousand steps.
Page 8
The Downtown Loop served as the project boundary for the City Center Retail Strategy.
INTRODUCTION
City Centers Retail History
Durham has a well-documented history as a railroad town that grew
into a tobacco manufacturing center and, eventually, into the home
of several notable universities. The story of downtowns past is more
1
elusive, yet more dramatic.
The following narrative is not intended to serve as a comprehensive
history of Durham, but as a description of events that impacted and
continue to affect City Centers retail environment today.
As the tobacco and textiles industries arrived and thrived after the
Civil War, so did associated establishments in downtown Durham.
Hotels, pharmacies, banks, five-and-dime stores, restaurants and
apparel establishments could all be found in abundance along Main
Street at the turn of the 20th century.
In the meantime, North Carolina Mutual Life Insurance Company,
Mechanics and Farmers Bank, and Mutual Community Savings were
building Parrish Street and an important sense of community. With
the African-American community denied access to white-owned
insurance and bank businesses, these institutions provided the
foundation, sometimes literally, for black-owned enterprise in Durham
and beyond. They anchored Parrish StreetBlack Wall Streetby
offering financing and a customer base (its staff and clients) to a
collection of stores, restaurants and service establishments that
formed a thriving, separate business district from Main Street. In an
era when the competence and self-sufficiency of African-Americans
were openly questioned, Parrish Street stood as a beacon of
success, a testament to untapped potential.
1 Sources for this section include: Jean Bradley Anderson, Durham County, 1990; Walter
B. Weare, Black Business in the New South: A Social History of the North Carolina Mutual Life
Insurance Company, 1973. Beth Teague, Mutual Interest, Our State, November 2005; www.
ncmutuallife.com; www.durham-nc.com; Changes in the Downtown Landscape: 1950-2000,
the North Carolina Collection, Durham Public Library; Occupancy map, business section of
Durham, North Carolina: 1972 (Allenton Realty and Insurance Company), Digital Durham,
Duke University and the North Carolina State Library.
Page 9
INTRODUCTION
At the conclusion of this era:
The intersection of Main and Corcoran Streets, at City Centers historic retail
center, is occupied on three corners by office buildings without appropriate
ground-level retail space.
PAST
PRESENT
Only two of Five Points corners remain. The other three consist of a public
plaza, the South Bank parking lot, and an empty, privately owned parcel that
functions as green space.
The two retail gateway corners north of the intersection of Main and Mangum
Streets no longer serve this role. The western corner is a pocket park created
from the remains of demolition. The eastern corner is a Masonic Temple.
Five Points facing northeast toward the intersection of East Chapel Hill
and Main Streets.
Historic West Parrish Street has been left without retail-anchoring structures
on any of its four corners. Currently, two are small parks, one is an empty
redevelopment site, and one is a coffee shop.
The Downtown Loop is completed, allowing potential customers to circumvent
City Center and avoid its retail areas entirely.
The impact of City Centers mid-20th-century retail decline reverberates today.
While surrounding retail areas have sprouted and prospered, Durhams downtown
area has become the hole in the donut, a void in the local retail market where
demand for stores and restaurants is neither generated nor fulfilled.
During the past five years, City Center has started to show signs of life. Pioneering
entrepreneurs have risked the unknown to establish businesses without the
comforts of an established customer base or adjacent retailers. For several
businesses -- most notably, restaurants, bars and cafes -- the risks are beginning
to pay off as their reputations grow and customers seek them out.
In other communities with comparable ground-level vacancy rates and low
population densities, these pioneering retailers would most likely have failed. The
fact that they are experiencing success may be because Durham customers, many
of whom have relocated from other urban areas, expect exceptional shopping and
dining experiences and reward retailers that provide a high level of quality.
Page 10
Facing west along Mangum Street. East Chapel Hill Street is in the
distance.
RETAIL 101
Retail spaces, particularly in mixed-use, urban
environments, generally endure for decades if not
longer. The tenants in these spaces will most likely
change many times. As a result, the sustainability
of City Centers retail environment will be primarily
determined by the quality of its ground-level, retailappropriate locations.
Retail Categories
Neighborhood Goods and Services (NG&S)
This category includes establishments that depend
upon the patronage of local residents and workers,
such as grocery stores, drugstores, florists,
bakeries, specialty food stores, delicatessens,
butchers, dry cleaners, tailors, laundromats, hair
salons, nail salons, day spas, printers, pet salons,
machine repair shops, shoe repair and shine
shops, hardware stores, gyms, and similar.
Neighborhood Goods & Services retailers rely on
spending from a nearby residential and workforce
customer base, generally within a mile radius.
NG&S is convenience-based retail -- it must be
close and easily accessible to its customers.
Existing examples of NG&S retailers in City Center
include Speed Dee Que Printing, Scott Tailors,
Main Street Pharmacy, Gurleys Pharmacy, Choice
Cut, Inflight Salon, Ligo Dojo Karate, Main Street
Shoe Repair, and Selams Convenience.
Page 11
RETAIL 101
Class of Space
Class A
Space that meets the requirement for a Class A rating typically has
the following attributes:
Located at an end-cap or prominently situated among in-line
establishments
Floor-to-ceiling clear height of 14 feet or more
Storefront width of 20 feet or more
Well-maintained
Clearly visible from primary streets
Constructed with quality materials
Properly lit exterior and display spaces
Clear pedestrian and vehicular access
Associated or adjacent parking
Class B
Space that meets the requirements for a Class B rating typically has
the following attributes:
Well-situated among in-line establishments
Floor-to-ceiling clear height of approximately 12 feet or more
Storefront width of 15 feet or more
Well-maintained
Diminished representation of factors listed for Class A space
Class C
Space that meets the requirements for a Class C rating typically has
the following attributes:
Located among in-line establishments
Floor-to-ceiling clear heights of less than 12 feet
Storefront width of less than 15 feet
Diminished representation of factors listed for Class B space
Page 12
Market Conditions
Without exception, every retailer prefers a nearby customer base
(residential and/or workforce population) in sufficient numbers
(density) and with spending capacity. These issues -- population,
density, and income are sometimes referred to as the Big Three
Questions. National retailers, in particular, will not consider an area
that fails to meet their minimum requirements for these market
criteria.
Market conditions are generally measured by determining the
presence of a local residential and/or workforce population that
is currently underserved in the tenants retail category. Preferably,
this population is densely located, as measured by household
units per acre or office occupancy rates. In regards to income,
the median household income or salary of the local area must be
higher for GAFO retailers, which rely on greater concentrations of
disposable income. In contrast, grocery stores and dry cleaners can
typically accept a lower number, since most everyone needs these
establishments regardless of income level.
RETAIL 101
Site-Selection Criteria
Financial Calculations
Accessibility to major streets and connecting travel routes. Oneway, dead-end, and pedestrian-only streets are considered much
less retailer-friendly than a two-way street that passes through
adjacent neighborhoods.
Visibility to vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Vehicular traffic
counts typically are provided by the local or state Department of
Transportation (DOT). Pedestrian activity is often measured much
less precisely, either through site observation or by evaluating
nearby concentrations of office or residential development.
Commuter patterns. Coffee cafes, doughnut shops and
newsstands want locations on the AM peak side of commuter
traffic; Starbucks, Dunkin Donuts, and Au Bon Pain require that
they are located on the incoming-traffic side of the thoroughfare.
Take-home prepared-foods stores, wine and liquor stores, and
florists may prefer a PM peak site.
Page 13
Vacant Space;
32.6%
OfficeOccupied
Space; 35.4%
Source: City Center Retail Inventory (August/September 2009)
F&B; 49.3%
Streets
Several characteristics of the street infrastructure create
accessibility challenges in reaching City Centers retail, including:
GAFO; 19.6%
Class C;
22.6%
Sidewalks
Class B;
54.0%
Parking
The majority of City Centers retail parking is
within structured parking lots along the southern
edge of the Downtown Loop/railroad tracks. This
creates challenges for its customer base from the
surrounding suburban community.
Line-of-Sight to Retailer. Suburban customers
are accustomed to driving to their destination,
parking in a surface parking lot and walking
with a visual connection to their desired
retailer.
Journey From Parking Deck to Retailer. The
location of the parking lots and the resulting
path to the retail destinations challenge the
comfort level of most retail customers.
Page 16
Demand
Retail demand in City Center is measured by calculating the areas
ability to attract existing and projected expenditures by residents,
employees, and visitors that might reasonably and regularly patronize
establishments there. This amount of spending is divided by
expectations for sales per square foot by retail tenant type. The result
of this calculation yields the total amount of demand for City Center for
each retail category.
3 Population and income statistics for primary, secondary and tertiary trade areas were
generated by Claritas, Inc. for Retail Compass LLC (September 2009).
Photos of before and after of 3 places, goes here caption goes here caption goes here caption
goes here caption goes here caption
The primary customer trade area (darkest blue) for City Centers retail extends just beyond the
Downtown Loop. The secondary trade area (medium blue) extends north to Trinity Street, east
to Elizabeth Street, south to Route 147, and west to Duke University East Campus. The tertiary
trade area (lightest blue) extends generally north to I-85, east to Guthrie Avenue, south to
Cornwallis Road, and west to Watts Hospital-Hillandale.
Page 17
4 Data on population, number of households and income level is derived from information
collected in the 2000 Census. Nine years old, these figures grow increasingly inaccurate as
each year passes. With the completion of the 2010 Census, this data will be more reliable.
However, it is important to note that prospective retailers will use the same information
gathered for this report when analyzing site potential.
Page 18
Patrons of the arts are drawn to the City Center area by gallery
openings and shows, live music and other performances, and other
arts-related activities. These individuals live in the broad community
but may not otherwise be engaged in City Center. After attending a
program at Durham Performing Arts Center (DPAC), the Carolina
6 Visitor figures for City Center were derived from the Durham Convention and Visitors Bureau
and Downtown Durham, Inc.
Page 19
Retail Category
Existing Supply
Estimated Demand 8
Unmet Demand
NG&S
20,100 sf
23,200 sf
3,100 sf
F&B
32,000 sf
43,300 sf
11,300 sf
GAFO
12,800 sf
14,499 sf
1,700 sf
Totals
64,900 sf
81,000 sf
16,100 sf
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Claritas, Inc., Inventory of Existing Retail Establishments in City Center (2009),
Retail Compass LLC
As the unmet demand figures illustrate, Food & Beverages retail has the greatest amount of sales
potential within City Center by a wide margin. Neighborhood Goods & Services has enough unmet
demand to support approximately two additional stores, given City Centers current primary trade area
figures. GAFO retail demand for City Center is statistically satisfied.
Please refer to the appendices for more detailed information about expenditures and total square feet of
demand generated by residents, office workers, and visitors.
7 Capture rate is a term indicating the estimated percentage of expenditures that can be attracted to a given location. The potential capture
rates for City Center are based on typical performance by establishments in each retail category and the strength of the competition posed in
each retail category.
8 Estimated demand is a calculation of the total amount of expenditures per retail category multiplied by an assigned capture rate for that
category and divided by expected sales per square foot for that retail category, according to ULI standards and ICSC reports. For the purposes of
this table, demand figures for high productivity retail sales as represented in the appendix are assigned.
Page 20
Each additional 1,000 square feet of commercial office space in City Center
Approx. 400 additional square feet of retail space within City Center
The City Center projects proposed by Greenfire Development and scheduled for completion over the 15 years will greatly affect the areas
retail potential -- not only in terms of generating additional demand, but also by increasing the population and sense of neighborhood in
the district. For potential retailers, the enhancement of a built-in customer base at City Center will have the most significant impact on
the areas ability to attract new stores and restaurants. Efforts to create new opportunities for living, working and visiting should be strongly
supported if a successful mix of retailers is an important objective for City Centers future.
9 Additional retail demand figures were determined by dividing the total amount of retail demand currently generated in category by the number of current development units for each category in
City Centers primary and secondary trade areas. Consideration was given for projected increases in income.
Page 21
Retail Nodes
Within City Center, three areas are beginning to establish themselves
as nodes of retail activity. Although tenants are found outside
these zones today, the retail nodes are distinguished by a density
of retailers and a collection of high-quality available retail spaces.
Five Points
The strongest case for reinforcing the retail node at Five Points is
that one already exists there. The most important recommendations
for this district to reach its full potential involve:
Activating the three cornerless points (page 26)
Maintaining the street trees (page 31)
Allowing alternative retail signage (page 31), and
Encouraging pedestrian activity by heightening driver-awareness
through the Five Points intersection (page 32).
Retail nodes will best thrive at the intersections of City Centers through-streets.
Page 22
Destination-Driven/Market-Appropriate
Page 23
Long-Range Outlook
The reinvention of City Centers retail environment will not take
place over a short time. While many of the recommendations at the
conclusion of this document will be quickly implemented, others will
take years, if not decades.
The following timeline estimates when significant milestones are
likely to occur:
Page 24
Non-retail storefronts
are being leased outside
of the Retail Nodes.
Long Term
The Plan presented a strategy for renewal (that) draws upon the
celebration, exploration, and preservation of this streets history to
educate visitors, inspire businesses, and attract investment. Using
this statement as a marching order, the City Center Retail Strategy
focused extensively on Parrish Street, asking the following questions:
Does Parrish Street have ground-level spaces and supporting
public infrastructure (parking, space for loading and servicing,
lighting, streetscape) to attract and sustain retail tenants?
Given modern retail requirements, current retail competition, and
levels of City Center retail demand, is Parrish Street a marketsupportable retail location today? In the future?
Regarding the first issue, Parrish Street has good-quality, groundlevel spaces and necessary infrastructure to support viable retail.
The corridors difficulty regarding retail attraction and sustainability is
answered by the second question; local market conditions for retail
along Parrish Street are not favorableat least, not yet.
Recommendations
Install public art element on empty podium at the small public plaza
in Five Points.
Encourage redevelopment at South Bank site, as recommended in
the 2008 Master Plan Update (page 58-59).
Permit outdoor restaurant use in the green space adjacent to Bull
McCabes to activate that point.
Implement the incentive purchasing and redevelopment of the cityowned building on the corner of Morris & Chapel Hill Streets to
expedite activation of that point.
Responsible Entities
City of Durham, Office of Economic and Workforce Development,
Greenfire Development (South Bank site), Arts Council & Cultural Master
Plan, private sector, Preservation Durham, Downtown Durham, Inc.
Priority Rating 1
Recommendations
Work with current property
owners on creative solutions
to activating storefronts.
Prepare City Center-specific
design guidelines for groundlevel commercial space that
address visibility into and
public activation of non-retail
space.
Responsible Entities
Planning Department, Office
of Economic and Workforce
Development, Downtown
Durham, Inc.
Priority Rating 1
Page 26
Recommendation
Revise the guidelines to
better balance historic
preservation goals with
modern retail tenant
requirements.
Responsible Entities
Planning Department,
Downtown Durham, Inc.,
Historic Commission,
Preservation Durham
Priority Rating 3
Many of City Centers prime corners for retail are occupied by nonretail structures ill-suited for conversion. These properties include
the Masonic Temple, Old First Citizens Bank, Sun Trust, Latino Credit
Union Building, and Southbank. This condition reduces the locations
available to site strong retail anchors that need high visibility and
accessibility.
Recommendations
Target these parcels and others for building reuse programs that
combine incentives for faade improvements (specifically targeted at
creating window display space) with funding for costly yet necessary
upgrades to fire-safety systems, egress, utility capacity and similar
issues.
Where appropriate, work with Planning Department and Historic
Commission to accommodate provisions for signage and the creation
of display space in historic structures.
Responsible Entities
City of Durham, Office of Economic and Workforce Development, Private
Sector Landlords and Developers, Planning Department, Downtown
Durham, Inc., Historic Commission, Preservation Durham
Priority Rating 4
Page 27
Recommendations
Evaluate the fiscal impact of a property-tax break for
landlords with a ground-level retail tenant. Consider
expanding this program to landlords with any groundlevel tenant that meets the storefront guidelines for
non-retail uses.
Develop incentives to attract retail businesses,
including funding the Retail Merchandise-Based
Incentive Program. This program offers grants
for tenant improvements to create a space more
appealing to retailers. By requiring a 50 percent
match from tenants, the existing Retail MerchandiseBased Incentive Program limits participation.
Reducing this required match to 25 percent of the
total costs would increase participation throughout
City Center.
Expedite review for signage and building
improvements as well as liquor licensing.
Page 28
Responsible Entities
Office of Economic and Workforce Development,
Downtown Durham, Inc., Durham commercial brokerage
community, private sector development,
Priority Rating 1
Recommendations
Assign a single point of
contact for retailers seeking
to navigate the incentive
programs that apply to City
Center.
Commit funding for incentive
programs to an extended
term (3, 5, or 10 years).
Responsible Entities
Office of Economic and
Workforce Development,
Downtown Durham, Inc.
Priority Rating 1
Retailers that request demographics and income data for City Center
will be concerned about the reported number of residents and
households inside and adjacent to the Downtown Loop. Because
the information collected for the 2010 Census will provide the base
materials for all data sources for the next ten years, it is critical that
every City Center resident and household is counted.
Recommendation
Recommendations
Coordinate with the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, a nonprofit group that is monitoring census counting in underrepresented
Southern counties.
Responsible Entities
Responsible Entities
Priority Rating 1
Priority Rating 2
Page 29
Recommendation
As recommended in the 2008 Master Plan
Update (page 30), create opportunities
for residential, office and hospitality
development to increase retail demand
and establish an inhabited retail
environment.
Responsible Entities
Office of Economic and Workforce
Development, Downtown Durham, Inc.,
private sector development
Priority Rating 1
Page 30
Recommendations
Study options regarding the conversion of
Mangum and Roxboro Streets into two-way
roads between Routes 85 and 147. This
alteration will slow traffic, increase retail
visibility and accessibility at the districts,
and improve pedestrian activity across
these streets.
Responsible Entities
City Manager, City DOT, NC DOT, elected
officials
Priority Rating 2
Recommendation
Convert the Loop to a two-way street as
recommended in the 2008 Master Plan
Update (page 62-66).
Responsible Entities
Office of Economic and Workforce
Development, Downtown Durham, Inc., City
DOT, NC DOT, public sector
Priority Rating 2
Recommendation
Responsible Entities
City DOT, Downtown Durham, Inc.
Priority Rating 2
Recommendations
Responsible Entities
Planning Department, Office of Economic
and Workforce Development, Downtown
Durham, Inc., General Services
Priority Rating 2
Page 31
Recommendations
Duplicate pedestrian-friendly intersection
paving already in place at Main Street
through railroad crossings at Mangum and
Corcoran Streets.
Incorporate landscaping at these
intersections.
Consider pedestrian-level lighting,
extending from catalyst uses to City Center
along Mangum and Corcoran Streets, to
create a visual connection between the
two areas at night, as discussed in the
2008 Master Plan Update (page 32).
Responsible Entities
Office of Economic and Workforce
Development, Downtown Durham, Inc.,
General Services, City DOT, NC DOT, NC
Railroad, Elected Officials, City Manager,
Capitol Broadcasting
Priority Rating 3
Page 32
Recommendations
Remove a sufficient number of bollards to
allow pedestrian mid-block crossing while
still maintaining an acceptable level of
safety.
Consider reinstalling the paving system at
Five Points to create a large speed table
that would slow cars and emphasize the
presence of pedestrians in this area.
Responsible Entities
General Services, Downtown Durham, Inc.,
Department of Transportation
Priority Rating 3
Recommendations
Recommendation
Responsible Entities
Office of Economic and Workforce
Development, Downtown Durham, Inc.,
General Services, NC DOT
Priority Rating 4
Responsible Entities
General Services, Lanier Parking
Management, Office of Economic and
Workforce Development, Downtown Durham,
Inc.
Priority Rating 4
Page 33
Recommendations
Focus retail nodes at Five Points, Main Street, and Orange/East
Chapel Hill/City Hall Plaza.
Determine and promote the brand identity associated with the City
Center.
Work with landowners in these districts to create short-term,
favorable conditions for retail occupancy. As these areas become
established, attracting and signing future generations of tenants will
be considerably less difficult.
In conjunction with incentive programs to attract new retailers,
investigate the needs of existing retailers who have pioneered these
areas.
Responsible Entities
Office of Economic and Workforce Development, Downtown Durham, Inc.,
private sector development, commercial brokerage community, existing
City Center retailers
Priority Rating 1
Page 34
Recommendations
Investigate the process required to become a designated Arts District
on the local and state levels. The focus of this district should be the
culinary arts.
Discuss the possibility of creating an overlay zone to reward
developers
who include culinary artists, such as restaurants, cafes, bars, foodoriented retail, and similar into new or existing buildings.
Create a marketing and special events program around the culinary
arts theme.
Consider coordination with culinary and hospitality programs at nearby
schools and universities to offer internships at downtown facilities.
Responsible Entities
Planning Department, Durham Arts Council, Office of Economic and
Workforce Development, Downtown Durham, Inc.
Priority Rating 2
Recommendations
Promote non-retail uses, such as professional office and government
services, to occupy vacant spaces in City Center and to activate
sidewalks. For the near-term, this strategy should be applied even in
the retail districts.
Require non-retail uses, especially in the retail districts, to follow
guidelines (yet to be established) that will create storefronts that
respect the retail environment. These requirements might include a
mandatory awning, restrictions on window treatments, placement of
visitor areas (such as waiting rooms) at the front of the spaces, etc.
Responsible Entities
Planning Department, Office of Economic and Workforce Development,
Downtown Durham, Inc., private sector development, commercial
brokerage community, Parrish Street Advocacy Committee
Priority Rating 1
Page 35
Recommendations
Recommendations
Responsible Entities
Responsible Entities
Priority Rating 1
Priority Rating 5
Page 36
CONCLUSION
The path to a successful retail environment is not easy or direct. Best results will be achieved when a series of small
initiatives produce larger, cumulative effects. Just as critical as attracting new businesses is supporting, with more
than just words, the retailers that came to City Center with little or no assistance or encouragement. Their continued
perseverance is the first step on this long road.
Before City Centers retail achievement can be measured, it must first be defined. Three key components will determine
its success:
Retail businesses will be concentrated into three recognizable districts at Five Points, West Main Street, and Orange
Street/West Chapel Hill Street.
Ground-level spaces outside these districts will be occupied by retail and non-retail users with storefront designs that
respect the history of their retail environment and acknowledge their roles as activators of City Centers sidewalks.
The vacancy rate in City Center will have dropped from 33 percent to less than 15 percent.
Do not be fooled by the simplicity of these objectives. A list of complicated tasks must be implemented to achieve each
one. With a rebounding economy, continued prosperity in this region and relentless determination of responsible entities,
these goals might be achieved within the next ten years.
The good news is that todays City Center retail environment is essentially a blank canvas. From the tenacity and hope of
several pioneering retailers, an exciting collection of stores, restaurants and services can be built.
Page 37
Category
Groceries, Sundries and Similar
Total Captured
Expenditures 10
Retail Sales
per SF (Low) 11
$1,046,000
$258
4,060
$422
2,480
Prepared Foods
$296,250
$175
1,693
$218
1,359
Alcohol at Home
$195,600
$185
1,055
$283
692
$473,200
$190
2,491
$243
1,944
NG&S SUBTOTAL
Food Away from Home
Alcohol Away from Home
$2,011,050
9,298
6,474
$586,300
$225
2,606
$329
1,782
$32,560
$115
282
$138
235
F&B SUBTOTAL
$618,860
2,888
2,018
$225,150
$200
1,126
$269
838
$11,650
$161
72
$204
57
$82,500
$163
505
$205
402
Other GAFO
$60,400
$186
325
$225
268
GAFO SUBTOTAL
TOTAL DEMAND WITHIN SECONDARY TRADE AREA
$379,700
2,027
1,566
$3,009,610
14,214
10,058
10 Total captured expenditures are calculated by multiplying the total expenditures for retail spending estimates within each trade area by an assigned capture rate. Capture rates are
determined by evaluating the industry standards for each category within the context of the existing retail competiition, established travel patterns and drive times.
11 Under the condition of high productivity, retail sales are high, thus consumer expenditures are concentrated on a smaller amount of total retail space. Low productivity conditions
assign lower potential sales per square foot to each type of retail; therefore, a greater amount of retail space is supported but with significantly less profitabilitydivided by expected sales
per square foot for that retail category, according to ULI standards and ICSC reports. For the purposes of this table, demand figures for high productivity retail sales as represented in
the appendix are assigned. Under the condition of high productivity, retail sales are high, thus consumer expenditures are concentrated on a smaller amount of total retail space. Low
productivity conditions assign lower potential sales per square foot to each type of retail; therefore, a greater amount of retail space is supported but with significantly less profitability.
Page 38
Category
Groceries, Sundries and Similar
Total Captured
Expenditures
Total
Demand- High
Productivity (SF)
$1,830,570
$258
7,105
$422
4,340
Prepared Foods
$439,380
$175
2,511
$218
2,016
Alcohol at Home
$467,145
$185
2,520
$283
1,652
$842,600
$190
4,435
$243
3,461
NG&S SUBTOTAL
$3,579,695
$3,155,220
$225
14,023
$329
9,592
$181,050
$115
1,570
$138
1,309
$3,336,270
$1,556,580
16,570
11,468
15,593
$200
10,901
7,783
$269
5,794
$132,510
$161
822
$204
649
$733,425
$163
4,486
$205
3,578
Other GAFO
$557,480
$186
2,997
$225
2,478
GAFO SUBTOTAL
$2,979,995
16,088
12,498
$9,895,960
48,251
34,868
Page 39
Category
Groceries, Sundries and Similar
Prepared Foods
Alcohol at Home
Total Captured
Expenditures
Retail Sales
per SF (Low)
Total
Demand- Low
Productivity
(SF)
Retail Sales
per SF (High)
Total
Demand- High
Productivity
(SF)
$2,876,570
$258
11,165
$422
6,820
$735,630
$175
4,204
$218
3,374
$662,745
$185
3,575
$283
2,343
$1,315,800
$190
6,925
$243
5,404
NG&S SUBTOTAL
$5,590,745
$3,741,520
$225
16,629
$329
11,375
$213,610
$115
1,852
$138
1,544
25,869
17,943
F&B SUBTOTAL
$3,955,130
$1,781,730
$200
8,909
$269
6,632
$144,160
$161
894
$204
706
$815,925
$163
4,991
$205
3,980
Other GAFO
$617,880
$186
3,322
$225
2,746
GAFO SUBTOTAL
TOTAL HOUSEHOLD-BASED DEMAND:
Page 40
18,481
12,919
$3,359,695
18,115
14,064
$12,905,570
62,465
44,926
Category
$1,102,668
5,226
3,489
$2,635,836
15,505
11,264
$27,187
133
100
$3,765,692
20,863
14,854
GAFO
TOTAL DEMAND BY OFFICE POPULATION:
Page 41
Category
Neighborhood Goods and Services
Food and Beverages
GAFO
Page 42
Total Captured
Expenditures
$568,421
2,694
1,799
$4,468,026
26,283
19,094
$90,745
443
335
$5,127,192
29,419
21,228
Category
33,789
23,231
60,269
43,277
GAFO
18,690
14,499
112,748
81,008
Page 43