Gendered Genocide Sri Lanka's War Against Tamils

Download as odt, pdf, or txt
Download as odt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Gendered Genocide: Sri

Lankas War Against Tamils

Tasha Manoranjan Tamil Guardian 17 November 2014


The following address was delivered by Tasha Manoranjan, a graduate from Yale Law
School, and founder and director of People for Equality and Relief in Lanka (PEARL),
at the Feminisms, Structural Violence and Transitional Justice Conference held at
York University, Toronto last month.
"Tamil women have suffered disproportionately throughout Sri Lankas
decades-long ethnic conflict. They have faced both the structural collapse of
communities as well as the erosion of societal norms. In response, an
increasing number of women joined the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam
(LTTE) starting in the 1980s and throughout the years prior to 2009, and
became an integral part of the armed resistance against the government.

As a result of prolonged exposure to this conflict, traditional Tamil gender


relations shifted dramatically. Within Tamil society, women were historically
valued as the bearers of culture, responsible primarily for maintaining the
home. Parents carefully protected or controlled women from childhood
until marriage, when authority over them would transfer to their husbands.
Due to the fact that womens domains did not typically extend beyond their
households, they were generally excluded from the political process. Society
rigorously maintained the image of women as sacred bearers of family and
community, utilizing females as symbolic markers to measure purity and
respect. This cherished image of women rendered the violent experiences
Tamil women faced during the war traumatic not only for them as
individuals, but for the entire Tamil society as well.
In more recent years, Tamil women had joined the LTTE in greater numbers
than their male peers. Though female cadres had different personal reasons
for enlisting, many joined after experiencing some form of injustice at the
hands of the Sri Lankan Army. Most women came from the heavily
militarized north. The permanent insecurity of this environment inculcated a
desire for freedom and statehood, which included the motivation to take up
arms. One LTTE fighter, Senthulasi, described coming of age in Jaffna, a
heavily-militarized city: Her cousin was raped and killed by the Army on her
way home. Senthulasi said she ran away from home at the age of 15, to join
the LTTE and fight against the helplessness she felt daily. In speaking to me,
she urged me to return to America and tell others about Tamils plight. She
wanted me to say how girls who should be carrying pencils and books were
instead carrying guns, keeping watch over the borders of Tamil Eelam
instead of studying in school. I was struck by the intensity and commitment
she felt for the Tamil struggle; she spoke so simply, with heartbreaking
honesty.
Although most women initially joined the LTTE to find respite from this
suffocating physical insecurity, their involvement in the armed movement
had unintended, yet profound, cultural and social consequences. Local
psychologists noted that for Tamil women, joining the militants [was a]
liberating act, promising them more freedom and power. Tamil society had
always suppressed women into a subservient position it was the war that
has had a liberating role. Many of the female Tamil cadres with whom I
spoke expressed their desire to fight for the liberation of both their ethnicity
and also their subservient position in Tamil society.
When women first began to join the LTTE, they primarily worked in service

and support roles as caregivers for the wounded, but later took on positions
as frontline soldiers. This initially met with opposition from within the
conservative Tamil community. Many of the earlier female cadres reported
that male Tigers wanted them to flee with the civilians. Women had to
demonstrate their strength and competence to earn the respect of male LTTE
cadres; one cadre told me women were challenged to lift bigger bombs to
prove themselves. One can also attribute the acceptance of womens
participation in the war to the governments indiscriminate bombings of
civilian homes and schools: a clear sexual division of labor in war usually
disappears when there is no clear differentiation between the battle front
and the home front or rear. Women were forced to protect not only their
own physical integrity, but also that of their children. Female cadres
eventually prided themselves on performing all tasks completed by their
male counterparts. The LTTE even established male and female artillery
divisions, despite doubts that women could not manage an artillery team due
to their weight. Another female cadre, Isaimozhi, remarked with pride that
they surpassed male cadres in certain areas of fighting, such as sharp
shooting.
The LTTE also explicitly committed itself to gender equality and womens
empowerment. The LTTE expanded the agency of both female cadres and
civilian women within its territory by abolishing the dowry system and
promoting education. I witnessed the effects of this policy: I saw billboards
denouncing the dowry system, encouraging families to value children of both
genders equally. Female civilians and cadres confidently drove motorcycles
in saris and helmets unheard of a decade ago.
As Tamil women advanced to new roles in society, they strove to realize their
political aspirations. The female cadres with whom I spoke said that Sri
Lankan soldiers fought only for a paycheck, whereas the LTTE fought for the
freedom of their people and land. Isaimozhi said she aimed to kill on the
battlefield, but simultaneously regretted that violence was the only way to
actualize Eelam. Isaimozhi cited the decades of police brutality,
discrimination, and repression of Tamil rights, and concluded that war was
the only path to freedom. Isaimozhi told me, Tamils have been living as
slaves for the Sinhalese for decades. We cant live like that anymore. We have
to all achieve freedom or we have to all die trying.
Sexual assault has been a perennial feature of Sri Lankas conflict, and is
traditionally considered a fate worse than death in the Tamil community.
One female LTTE cadre, Vengai, described to me the strict policy of never

leaving a fallen cadres body behind. She remarked, It is worth risking my


life to save the lifeless body of another female cadre. It would be easier to
accept my own death, than the mutilation of their bodies and spirits. Stories
concerning the rape and mutilation of women are well-known among
Tamils; Krishanthi Kumaraswamis death is particularly infamous.
Kumaraswami was an eighteen year old Tamil student who was arrested
while passing through a Sri Lankan Army checkpoint in 1996. Her mother,
younger brother, and a neighbor went to the checkpoint that afternoon to
find her, refusing to leave until she returned safely with them. The soldiers
killed all three of them. An hour later, they gang raped Krishanthi and buried
her body. Reflecting the significance of this crime within the Tamil
community, a Tamil schoolteacher Padmini Ganesan, said, Every Tamil
remembers the Krishanthi case. For us, the checkpoints are slow-motion:
the trauma and the fear that we go through.
However, these stories do more than reflect on the vulnerable position of
women in conflict. For many Tamils, the high rates of sexual assault against
Tamil women in the war represented an attack on the integrity of their
community.

Difference between women pre and post-2009


Women have been uniquely affected and indeed, targeted, throughout Sri
Lankas war. Post 2009, Tamil women have been targeted particularly
because of the active role they played during the armed struggle. Women
who were in the LTTE, or are perceived as being supportive of the LTTE as
all Vanni Tamils are perceived are punished as a collective by triumphant
Sri Lankan forces.
A report released in March 2014 by Yasmin Sooka, one of the experts
appointed by the UN Secretary-General to report on Sri Lanka, found:
Abduction, arbitrary detention, torture, rape and sexual violence have
increased in the post-war period . These widespread and systematic
violations by the Sri Lankan security forces occur in a manner that indicates
a coordinated, systematic plan approved by the highest levels of
government.
In testimonies revealing the extent of sexual assault committed after 2009,
survivors reported being raped by uniformed male officers from the Sri
Lankan military.1 One woman was told, you Tamil, you slave, if we make

you pregnant we will make you abort you are Tamil we will rape you like
this, this is how you will be treated, even after an abortion you will be raped
again.
Recent reports from local human rights groups have documented hundreds
of Tamil women in northern Sri Lanka being forced to accept surgical
implantation of long-term birth control. These reports add to previous
reports of forced sterilization of Tamil women both during and after the war.
Forced birth control
In May 2007, a confidential cable from the United States Embassy in
Colombo discussed an EPDP medical doctor named Dr. Sinnathambi, who
performed forced abortions, often under the guise of a regular check-up, on
Tamil women suspected of being aligned with the LTTE.
A Health Department report from the Northern Province in 2012 found a 30times higher rate of birth control implants of Tamil women in Mullaitivu,
compared to the much more densely-populated Jaffna. In August 2013,
government health workers forced mothers to accept surgically-implanted
birth control in three villages [[Veravil, Keranchi, Valaipaddu]] in
Kilinochchi. When the women objected, the nurses said that if they did not
agree to the contraceptive, they could be denied treatment at the hospital in
the future.
According to the Home for Human Rights (HHR), an organization working
to protect the fundamental rights of those living in Sri Lanka, more than
80 percent of Tamil women in central Sri Lanka were offered a lump sum
payment of usually 500 rupees in return for their ability to reproduce. After
receiving this payment, women underwent surgical sterilization. Though
seemingly small, the sum is large for these predominately plantation
workers. The population of this Tamil group has dropped annually since
1996 by five percent, whereas the population of the country overall has
grown by 14 percent. HHR said: This systematic pattern of authoritysanctioned coerced sterilizations may amount to an intentional destruction
of the Tamil estate population.
In contrast, police and army officers have been encouraged to have a third
child, through payment of 100,000 rupees from the government. The
officers taking advantage of this offer are overwhelmingly Sinhalese.

Cases of coerced birth control and forced sterilization are clear evidence of
genocide. The Genocide Convention obligation to prevent and punish
genocide is not a matter of political choice or calculation, but one of binding
international law. The UN Security Council should refer Sri Lanka to the
International Criminal Court for investigation and prosecutions into war
crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. Concurrently, courts in
countries that may exercise jurisdiction over the events and alleged
perpetrators should prosecute these crimes.
Deeply entrenched, institutionalized impunity for Sri Lankas past crimes
against Tamils has enabled ongoing violations against Tamil women to
flourish. Tamils currently live in an environment absent of both war and
peace.
Currently, there is 1 soldier for every 3 Tamils in the North: an
unconscionably high ratio given that war ostensibly ended over 5 years ago.
In Tamil-speaking areas, the Sri Lankan military has increased its economic
role, expanded the amount of land it controls, and is essentially establishing
itself as a permanent, occupying presence.
The extreme level of militarization uniquely affects Tamil women. There are
approximately 90k female-headed households after the end of the armed
conflict. These women are especially vulnerable to sexual violence due to the
militarys predatory practices.
NGOs such as HRW and Freedom from Torture have reported on
widespread and systematic sexual violence inflicted on Tamil women and
men, including in detention and rehabilitation centres.
Local NGOs focusing on womens rights have reported on forced
conscription of over 100 (109) young Tamil women and girls from Vanni into
the 99% Sinhalese military, under the pretext of performing clerical work.
These women were not allowed to leave or contact their families when
informed that they would be performing military duties. In December 2012,
thirteen of these women were admitted to Killinochchi Hospital many were
unconscious. They were denied access to hospital staff, their families, and a
local Tamil parliamentarian who inquired after their condition.
Conclusion

Sri Lankas suffocating political environment will only breed further violence
and instability. Tamil women must play a greater role in the economic and
political development of the northeastern regions of the country, and a just
political solution must address their historically disadvantaged situation.
The LTTE made strides in this direction when it conscientiously embraced a
policy of gender equality, both in its armed movement and in its statebuilding apparatus. The lives of women in LTTE-controlled areas gradually
but markedly improved over time.
These advances have been steadily corroded after the governments
genocidal assault in early 2009. Where women once felt safe and secure, they
are now vulnerable under the militarys gaze and thumb.
As evidence of ongoing atrocities adds to evidence of the 2009 massacres
such as the mass graves found in Mullaitivu this year international
pressure for justice for Tamils is growing. The UN HCHR is currently
investigating violations of international law in Sri Lanka, and will report to
the UN HRC next March about its findings. There are still significant
obstacles impeding a future in which Tamils live freely and in peace, but we
must recognize how far we have come since the horrific bloodbath of 2009.
The world now recognizes SL as an authoritarian dictatorship that cannot be
trusted with the fate of thousands of Tamils who were killed in 2009. From
this realization, the world must recognize that SL cannot be trusted with the
political future of Tamils either.
Posted by Thavam

You might also like