NEMA Force Allowed On The Flange

NEMA Force Allowed on the flange - Pipelines, Piping and Fluid Mecha...
1 of 4
http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=208759
Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
Join Eng-Tips Forums

Home > Forums > Mechanical Engineers > Activities > Pipelines, Piping and Fluid Mechanics engineering Forum
NEMA Force Allowed on the flange

thread378-208759
Share This
farhad2474 (Mechanical) (OP)
2
Feb
08
2:04
Hi
I recently involved with a compressor it has 16 flange at output. I am going to do stress analyze the pipe is connecting to this compressor. The
venders catalogue mentioned that this compressors flange can outstand 10x NEMA forces . I would be appreciated if some body tell me what
mean it is (10 x NEMA).
Best regard
farhad
DSB123 (Mechanical)
2
Feb
08
6:05
farhad2474,
If what you write is correct then the Vendor is saying that the allowable loads acting on his flange can be 10 times the NEMA quoted
values. This seems to be a very robust compressor if that is the case. I would check and ask for definative allowables from the Vendor rather
than accepting catalogue information.
2
Feb
08
8:15
hi ;DSB123
thank you for you answer . Really i am right. They wrote like this in the meeting with my company .I wasnt involve that time.so please tell me
if you know a bout 10x NEMA .
best regard farhad
JohnBreen (Mechanical)
2 Feb
08
10:39
farhad2474
You will need to get a copy of NEMA Standard SM-23. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A STANDARD FOR STEAM TURBINES. On steam turbines,
the inlet is the smaller and hotter nozzle and on compressors the outlet is the hotter and smaller nozzle. You will need to read and understand
this Standard. Then using SM-23 you will have to calculate the loadings (a function of nozzle size and temperature)that are within the allowable
limits of the Standard. Your compressor is said to be able to accommodate loadings that are an order of magnitude greater than the NEMA
Standard maximum allowable loadings. This is a surprisingly robust compressor.
You should also read and understand API Standard 617, Centrifugal Compressors.
I concur with DSB13, get the actual allowable loadings in writing from the compressor manufacturer to cover your employer's liabilities.
LSThill (Mechanical)
3 Feb
08
12:34
Piping Stress Analysis Design Criteria for Compressor with Steel Nozzles and Castings
Steel Centrifugal Compressor Force, Moment and Stress Limitations
1. With Limitations are not provided by vendors, the following limits are guidelines which are reasonable for design.
2. At operating temperature, using the hot modulus E resultant bending moments are permissible up to a value which would cause a
bending stress of Sh/4 in a connection having a section modulus equal to the connecting piping for the same size where the connection is 4
NPS or larger. On smaller size connections a stress of Sh/3 shall be permitted. (Sh is as defined by ASME B31.1 or B31.3 current issue, for the
material of construction.)
11/12/2014 10:18 AM
2 of 4
3. NEMA SM 21 & 22 X 1.85

a. Most compressor vendors specify 1.85 times the NEMA SM 21 & 22 standards as their allowable load limits. Generally, this indicates that do
not have test data to substantiate allowable loads. There are several methods of circumventing this problem. The best method is to present the
piping loads to the vendor prior to purchase and making the loading part of the contract. If the equipment has been purchased, the loads
should be presented to the vendor for review for possible acceptances. Reference to API 617 demonstrates.
From Korea
L S THILL
MJCronin (Mechanical)
4
Feb
08
8:20
farhad,
John Breen gives good advice....get the allowable loads in writing from the compressor vendor.
You may be surprised at how many operating problems are blamed on "excesive piping loads" during the startup phase, when the true fault
usually lies with the compressor vendor.
With regard to the point about NEMA SM-23 being STEAM TURBINE loadings, yes this is true, but my experience has been that the major
compressor vendors will not develop thier own set of acceptable loads.
They, as a group, prefer to play the game of "submit to us your loadings, then we will charge you a extra to review and approve them"
Over the past 30 years, they see this as being a "seperate profit center" and a trap that all AEs seem to fall into.
My opinion only..
-MJC
5
Feb
08
2:48
thank for answering to my question

i am going to use following Equation for allowable load on the flang of compressoer according to NEMA-23
Fx=50Dc
Fy=125 Dc
Fz=100 Dc
Mx= 250Dc
My= 125Dc
Mz=125Dc
Dc= (18+equivalent dimeter)/3
Am i right ?
best regard
farhad
tigny (Structural)
6
Mar
08
4:39
Farhad2474, dear all,

I would like to input a little of my own experience in this field.
If you use a software like CAEPIPE or CEASAR II, you should use the analysis tools for NEMA SM23, and enter all relevant details: equipement
centerline axis, !for all nozzles: nozzle nominal diameter, distance from resolution point (= biggest nozzle) to nozzle, calculated forces and
moments, and if needed, the factor for allowable increase.
If the vendor's catalog gives you an allowable of 10 time NEMA SM-23 on this nozzle, it means a check of only limit 1:
chapter 8.4.6.1 gives limit 1 on total resultant force and total resultant at any connection
formulas are given for resultant forces and resultant moments, as well as equivalent connection size
11/12/2014 10:18 AM
3 of 4
according to your manufacturer spec., you can multiply 500xDe by 10

and check 3FR+MR <= 10x500De
According to your vendor's catalog, this should be the only thing to check.
But if you want to comply to NEMA, you shall check also the following, which will in turn mean much lower loads on the
machine:
chapter 8.4.6.2 gives limit 2, a on combined resultants of the forces and moments of the inlet, outlet, etc... resolved at the centerlines of the
biggest nozzle of all your nozzles (typically, for your compressor, the inlet nozzle)
There you need to know the relative dimensions from one nozzle to the other.
according to your manufacturer spec., you can multiply 250xDc by 10 and check 2Fc+Mc <= 10x250Dc (limit 2a)
and limit 2 ,b, which you gave, limits the componants of these resultants.
according to your manufacturer spec., you can multiply the second terms of the six formulas by 10 and check:
Fx= 10x50Dc, Fy = 10x125Dc, etc.
If you check only the limit 1, the overall compliance would not be OK, as far as my experience tells me.
The NEMA, as it is presented, is misleading because many people seem to check only the nozzles one by one, whereas the intent of the NEMA
is to take into account the dimensions of the machine (nozzle to nozzle).
And I don't like having fixed values from the vendor, since with the NEMA formulas, you could increase one componant, reduce another, and
still be within the limits. I'd rather have him certify the allowable coefficient.
yours truly,
tigny
tigny (Structural)
6
Mar
08
5:56
Hi all,
I forgot to mention that all calculations to NEMA should be done with english units (pounds for forces, foot pounds for moments), then the
results can be transfered to SI or others.
Otherwise, because on non dimension factors in the formulas, you'll get into trouble.
In API 617 you have formulas for SI units (Newtons and Newton.meters), but a 1.85 factor is already included.
yours truly,
tigny
robinc (Mechanical)
26
Mar
08
12:10
Hi all,
Regarding the "resolution point" for the combined moments in API 617 and/or NEMA SM23:
I understand the forces/moments are "resolved at the centreline of the largest connection ..." (API 617 2002 pg 2-42)
Where along this centreline is this force resolved ... the nozzle face ... in the vertical plane of the shaft ... random location?
Caesar II implies that it is the nozzle face but I can't find this explicitly stated in either code. In my mind the resolved forces should be about
the shaft. If these loadings deflect the shaft, then you end up with mechanical issues.
Looking forward to either a one sentence clarification, reference, or long discussion.
Thanks,
Robin
C2it (Petroleum)
27
Mar
08
9:20
Robinc,
The resolution point is not too clear. It should always be specified and agreed with the vendor. In a 2 nozzle machine there is logic in using the
11/12/2014 10:18 AM
4 of 4
largest nozzle face and c.l., since that is where major pipe loads are imposed. Using that for combined loads means that the moment effect of
forces acting there is zero.
tigny (Structural)
31
Mar
08
18:08
Hello Robinc,
you state "If these loadings deflect the shaft, then you end up with mechanical issues."
I would dare to say "if loadings deflects the pressure casing, the bearing casing and/or the gearbox casing, then you may end up with
mechanical issue". I suppose that if the shaft bends, you shurely have already rubbed everyplace in your machine!
About the reference point: At first we took some reference point at the level of the fixed point of the machine (between the fixed legs i.e. for
compressors-expanders) but to be more consistent with NEMA SM23, API 617, and after reading the help file from CAESAR II, and also because
of the request of one of our clients, we now use the biggest nozzle center as the reference point.
yours truly,
tigny
Join | Indeed Jobs | Advertise

Copyright 1998-2014 ENGINEERING.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
Unauthorized reproduction or linking forbidden without expressed written permission.
11/12/2014 10:18 AM

NEMA Force Allowed On The Flange - Pipelines, Piping and Fluid Mechanics Engineering - Eng-Tips

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NEMA Force Allowed On The Flange - Pipelines, Piping and Fluid Mechanics Engineering - Eng-Tips

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

NEMA Force Allowed On The Flange - Pipelines, Piping and Fluid Mechanics Engineering - Eng-Tips

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is NEMA and what does it specify?

What are the allowable stress limits according to the discussion?

NEMA Force Allowed on the flange - Pipelines, Piping and Fluid Mecha...

Join Eng-Tips Forums

farhad2474 (Mechanical) (OP)

farhad2474 (Mechanical) (OP)

3. NEMA SM 21 & 22 X 1.85

farhad2474 (Mechanical) (OP)

thank for answering to my question

Farhad2474, dear all,

according to your manufacturer spec., you can multiply 500xDe by 10

Join | Indeed Jobs | Advertise

You might also like