Master Teacher Output
Master Teacher Output
Master Teacher Output
Revision Code: 00
Department of
Education
Position Title
Parenthetical Title
Office Unit
Reports to
Position
Supervised
Salary Grade
18-20
Effectivity Date
Page/s
JOB SUMMARY
Performs 30-50% teaching load; takes charge of curriculum enrichment, teacher coaching/mentoring, profesional development ,research, community
inkages,( professional development) and provided at least 20% assistance to school head in program implementation
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Education Bachelor of Elementary/Secondary Education or bachelors degree plus 18 professional uit in Education and 18 units for a Masters
degree in Education or its equivalent (MT-I), Bachelor of Elementary/Secondary Education or bachelors degree plus 18 professional
uit in Education and 24 units for a Masters degree in Education or its equivalent (MT-II), Completion of academic requirements for a
Masters degree in Education or its equivalent (MT-III -IV)
Experience 3 years of relevant experience (MT-I), 1 year as MT-I or 4 years as Teacher III (MT-II), 1 year as Master Teacher II or 5 years as
Teacher III (MT-III), 1 year as Master Teacher III or 5 years as Teacher III (MT-IV)
Eligibility RA 1080
Trainings None requires (MT-I), 4 hours of relevant training (MT-II), 8 hours of relevant training (MT-III), 16 hours of relevant training (MT-IV)
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education Masters Degree Graduate
Experience 3 years in service as Teacher III
Eligibility Licensure Examination for Teachers
Trainings Relevant trainings
Objectives
Designs
capacity
programs for teachers
Outputs
development
Developmental
Enhancement Training
Instructional Competence
Technical Assistance
Objectives
Designed capacity
development
programs
for
Outstanding
(5)
5
Designed
Capacity
Development Program
(INSET)
Documented demonstration
teaching
Approved and Implemented
Action research
Certificate of Completion
Instructional Materials
Increased NAT Performance
Class Adviser/Class
program
Zero Non-Readers
Quality performance of
teachers /pupils
Improved and interpreted
Test Results
Performance Indicators
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
(4)
(3)
4
3
4 items were attained
3 items were attained
Unsatisfactory
(2)
2
2 items were
attained
Poor
(1)
1
Only one
item
Objectives
Outstanding
(5)
teachers
Performance Indicators
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
(4)
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
attained
Served as demonstration
teacher
school/division
trainings
Made
Research
4 lesson demonstrations
for
level
served
Action
Action
research
conducted and utilized in
the
school/district/division
back up by the following
evidences
Research proposals was
approved by the SDS for
implementation
Research format
Proposed
Attended
PostGraduate Studies and
Seminars
lesson
demonstrations served
indicators
presented
were
2 lesson demonstrations
served
indicators
presented
were
No lesson
demonstr
ation
served
Only one
indicator
was
presented
lesson
demonstration
served
indicators
were presented
learning
interventions
Proposed results and
interpretation
Enrolled at least 6 units
of Post Graduate Course
Attended all prescribed
trainings and seminars
during the rating period
trainings
seminar
Attended at least 2
prescribed trainings
and seminar
Attended at
least 1
prescribed
training and
Objectives
Performance Indicators
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
(4)
(3)
Outstanding
(5)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
seminar
Made
Instructional
materials available for
teachers and pupils
Increased
10% increased
NAT
performance of school
rating period
All pupils
updated
record
6% increased
were
Conducted
remedial/interventi
on classes for
slow learners and
non readers
Planned
Evaluated
teacher mentoring
/coaching
sessions
conducted in every
quarter (with report)
5% increased
2
forms
updated
2 IMS made
throughout the rating
period
4 % increased
were
not
3 forms were
not updated
teacher mentoring
/coaching
sessions
conducted in every
quarter (with report)
1-2
teacher
mentoring
/coaching
sessions
conducted
in
every quarter
(with report)
1 IMS made
throughout the
rating period
3%
and
below
increase
No form
was
updated
No
teacher
mentoring
/coaching
sessions
conducte
d in every
quarter
(with
report)
20% of the
pupils levelled
up
test
evaluated
resultswere
2 test results
were evaluated
1
result
was
test
Objectives
Outstanding
(5)
Performance Indicators
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
(4)
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
evaluated
THE PER4MERS
Rodolfo Ranchez-Chairman
Ma. Victoria P. Parel-Rapporteur
Members:
Benilda R. Canonizado
Gregoria P. Arranz
Elvira B. Rabe
Florence T. Lopez
Salvador Lazo
Helen P. Del Castillo
Criselda R. Ragaza
Jennifer Remular