Battle of Harrah
Battle of Harrah
Battle of Harrah
org)
Home > Battle of Harrah
Battle of Harrah
A historic account of the invasion and horrific plunder of the Holy City of Medina by the
army of Yazid b. Mu'awiyah
Log in [1] or register [2] to post comments
An analytical look at the historic account of the invasion and horrific plunder of the holy city
of Medina in the year 63 AH by the army of Yazid b. Mu'awiyah.
Author(s):
Translator(s):
Publisher(s):
Category:
Topic Tags:
Old url:
http://www.al-islam.org/battle_of_harrah/
Person Tags:
Preface
History is a mirror that reflects the past events and happenings to the inquisitive eyes of
the researchers who, years and centuries later, anxiously and eagerly try to scrutinize the
past generations in order to recognize among them the forgotten figures, their roles, and
their decisive historical impact. It teaches lessons of benevolence, honesty, and
righteousness from the good among them and creates a strong dislike for the evil ones so
that their footsteps are not followed.
Nevertheless, the mirror of history is not as transparent and exhilarating as it should be;
for, instead of illustrating the birth of stars and the sunrise, it has crammed the long and
tortuous memory of ages and epochs with bitter recollections, sad views of sunset and
horrendous scenes of darkness!
Then, are the historians to be blamed to have witnessed most of the sorrows, battles,
killings, wailings, and captivities, overlooking the beautiful blossoms and flowerings; or else,
since the historians aspired to record something attractive and unique, to witness a smile,
and to profile kind and relaxing moments of history and there were few of them to be
found, and such moments were overshadowed by the onslaught of brutalities and
oppressions!
In any case, we are now opening another page from the early history of Islam that has
perhaps remained hidden from the eyes of majority of Muslims across the world. However,
the magnitude of oppression and aggression committed against innocent human beings
and brutalities reported in the pages of history against the inhabitants of the holy city of
Medina still shakes human conscience, and mournfully bereaves souls and bitterly torments
fair-minded people.
The battle of Harrah, which should be rightfully called the tragedy of Harrah occurred just
64 years after the migration of the Holy Prophet (s) to Medina and 53 years after his sad
demise. It took place in Medina, a city that was named as the city of the Prophet (s) whose
people were from the generation of the men and women who fore mostly established the
foundations of amity, compassion, benevolence, honesty and great Islamic culture
throughout the violently hostile Arab lands, and with their self-sacrifice removed the pagan
Arab customs of murder, plunder, and transgression and promoted the divine culture of
knowledge and insight, and respect for human dignity.
However, within this short historical period of 64 years, especially after the sad demise of
the Prophet of God (s), the Muslim community witnessed certain adverse and unanticipated
events which eventually led the Umayyad rule over them. Banu Umayyah (the Umayyids)
that was the polytheist tribe, and among the most aggressive ones against the Prophet (s)
and the Muslims, took the reign of Caliphate and command of the Muslims' lives, property,
and honor just within 40 years of the demise of the Prophet (s).
Yesterday's rebels and polytheists now returned triumphantly and sat on the Prophet's (s)
B. In the process of the Madinans' revolt and among various figures who lost their lives,
were executed, fled from Medina, or had to swear allegiance to Yazd out of degradation
and humiliation and to call themselves his slaves, there were those who in the earlier years
of the formation of deviation in political leadership of the Islamic community refused to take
even the smallest steps in the reformation and correction of the deviated politico-religious
trends; and when they happened to do so and stand against such perversions, was also a
Christian.
Subsequently, those who from the outset merely surrendered to the anti-Islamic trends and
viewed religion as a means of power and polity, took up the rule, recruited a powerful and
equipped army of newly converted Muslims who were unfamiliar with the basic teachings of
the Islam, and by means of forged traditions of the Prophet (s) and ostensibly religious
justifications persuaded them to slaughter and plunder the Muslims!
It is truly admonitory that such men as 'Abd Allh b. 'Umar who, according to the historical
reports regarded such high status and authenticity for themselves and were so cautious
and obsessive during the Caliphate of 'Al b. Ab Tlib ('a) that they would say, We should
be the last ones to swear allegiance to 'Al1! Whereas in order to prevent people from
opposition to Yazd and to encourage them to pledge allegiance to him, they proclaimed,
The one who dies without a pledge of allegiance to Yazd will die similar to the one who
dies in a state of ignorance.222
Yet, what is more admonitory is that these people who did not pledge allegiance to 'Al
('a)'s mighty hands, mind, and faith or when they did they did it hesitantly, hastened by
night to pledge allegiance to such persons as Hajjj b. Ysuf Thaqaf - the historically
notorious savage - not by shaking his hand as it was common but by vilely kissing his feet!
C. From whatever aspect that is considered, the tragedy of Karbal and the massacre and
plunder of Madinans are too massive and shameful; but what makes the resonance of those
tragedies more painful and agonizing is that the perpetrators of such cruelities have
introduced their inhuman actions as based on faith and religious foundations, to the extent
that the commanders of Yazd army in order to spur the troops to fight would shout at them
y khail Allh - O Army of Allah!3
Or, in the battle of Harrah, Muslim b. 'Uqba - the commander of Syrian army - wishes that
before dying he would be able to suppress the revolt of Medina and to terminate Yazd's
opponents in order to have enough spiritual provision in his book of deeds when meeting
Allah on the day of Resurrection!
No doubt, such slogans, statements and tactics are more of a devilish and political nature
than being rooted in ignorance and misunderstanding of religion. Unfortunately these
policies and practices rapidly influenced the hearts and minds of the newly converted nave
Muslims and the weak in faith and knowledge of Islamic teachings at that time.
It is for these reasons that the true scholars and the guardians of ideological boundaries of
religion have always been concerned with such misapplications and misunderstanding of
religion by the begrudged and spiteful and the feebleminded. In addition, whenever
possible, they have tried to represent the humane and rational essence of religion so that
no counter human and imprudent movement might be able to disguise its deviated and
detrimental face under superficially religious slogans and banners.
Hoping that report of this crucial period of early Islamic history may be a step towards
further appreciation of the real nature of the Umayyid's Rule and its background, brutal
policies and devilish tactics, its distortion of the Islamic teachings and the grievous
aftermaths. It may provide lessons from this painful incident for distinguishing truth from
falsehood and also serve as admonitions for avoiding wrong, inhumane, and anti-religious
ways and as motivation for moving toward justice, fairness, and righteousness.
Ahmad Turb
April 2008
1. Ibn Ab al-Hadd, Sharh-i Nahj al-Balgha, vol. 4, p.11.
2. Dhahab, Siyar Alm al-Nubal, vol. 3, p. 325.
3. Al-Mufd, Al-Irshd, vol. 2, p. 92.
Introduction
The battle of Harrah was a bitterly disastrous and painful event that took place in 63 A.H.
(682 C.E.) during the reign of Yazd b. Mu'wiyah between the Syrian troops and the people
of Medina.
In Arabic lexicon, Harrah means a rocky and rough terrain that is difficult to pass.14
This event has been named as such because the invasion of the state army of Shm (Syria)
took place from the east of Medina, i.e., from the rocky region of the city.2
It has also been called The Battle of Harrahtu Wqim in some historical sources since the
rocky terrains around Medina have been extensive and protracted, covering various
sections of its surrounding among which only the rocky terrains of the east side have been
called Harrahtu Wqim.3
The historians have recorded the distance between Harrahtu Wqim and Masjid al-Nab as
to be one ml.47
1. Ibn Manzr, Lisn al-Arab; Zubayd, Tj al-Ars, Ibn Abd al-Haq Baghdd, Marsid alIttil, under Harar.
2. Ibn Qutayba, Uyn al-Akhbr, vol. 1, p. 238; Al-Marif, p. 240; Ibn Kathr, Al-Nahya,
vol. 1, p. 365; Ibn Athr, Jmi al-Usl, vol. 10, p. 480.
3. Samhd, Waf al-Waf, vol. 1, p. 124; Ibn Khallikn, Wafayt al-Ayn, vol. 6, p. 276.
4. According to astronomers one ml has been calculated as three thousand dhir (cubit =
~ 50 cm) and according to traditionists as four thousand dhir which is equal to 2 km.
A Great Disaster
The battle of Harrah that is rightly called to be one the great catastrophies of history and
rated as one of the most cruel events perpetrated by the Umayyids has been so frustrating
and unbearable that some historians have tried to alleviate the lasting painful memories of
the Umayyid's reign by mentioning its marginal aspects and covering up the inhumane
There seems to be no evidence in historical records and documents indicating that this
social uprising was ascribed to any particular intellectual or political faction or leadership;
rather, the communal and tribal diversity of the participants in this popular movement
suggests that various social, religious, political, and emotional factors have prompted
harmonious sentiments among the people of Medina that culminated in a widespread
uprising, and cutting off the hands of Yazd's agents and administrators from that city.
Obviously, upon empathy and solidarity in rejecting the Umayyid rule and in order to
coordinate its defensive force, this spontaneous social uprising chose a commander in
chief. According to the historical reports, the Ansr had selected 'Abd Allh b. Hanzala1 and
the Quraysh had chosen 'Abd Allh b. Mut'2 as their military commanders.313
Therefore, if in 'Ashr (Karbala) tragedy and Imm Husayn ('a)'s movement, the goals,
plans, and motives were above all centered in a perfectly recognized leader, i.e., Imam
Husayn b. 'Al ('a) with his holiness being considered as the pivot of the movement, in the
battle of Harrah and the social movement of Madinans, religious, political, historical, and
emotional grounds must be sought on which the movement, without enjoying an
outstanding leadership, had been able to bring the scattered tribes and various clans
settled in Medina to a similar conclusion and integrate their power and capabilities toward
rising up against Yazd and his agents.
Evidently, it would be impossible for the history researchers to have access to all those
causes and grounds, with such long interval and scarcity of historical documents. However,
a considerable portion of these causes can be recognised on the basis of what has been
recorded or stated.
bloodsheds and his openly blatant transgression of the Islamic laws, they began to air their
protest against the Syrian government. 'Uthmn b. Muhammad b. Ab Sufyn - the
governor of Medina - pretended to show his competence by trying to make the dignitaries
of Medina pleased with himself, the rule, and Yazd and to calm down his own jurisdiction.
He sent some of the youths of Ansr and Muhjirin to Damascus so that they could meet
with young ruler Yazd in person and discuss their complaints with him; perhaps he would
be able to give them convincing answers and avail them with his gifts and bounties.414
In this meeting, Yazd not only was unable to attract the attention of the emissaries of
Medina and redress their grievances, rather on the other hand, he further proved their
previous beliefs and impressions of his incompetence by showing frivolous and foolish
behavior.515
There is difference of opinion in historical sources as to the number of the emissaries
dispatched from Medina to Syria in 62 A.H. (682 C.E.). Some have recorded their number to
be ten6, others have reported more.7 Historians have recorded this meeting as follows:
'Abd Allh b. Hanzala Ghasl al-Mal'ika, 'Abd Allh b. Ab 'Amr b. Mughayra Makhzm,
Mundhir b. Zubayr and a group of the noblemen of Medina accompanied them.8
When the emissaries came to visit Yazd, he paid homage to them by giving them generous
gifts.
He even gave a hundred thousand dirhams to one of them, 'Abd Allh b. Hanzala b. Ab
'mir, who had come along with eight of his children, and gave some gifts to others, too.9
Despite all this, his mean behavior was not hidden from the guests.
These guests scrutinized all the conducts and life style of Yazd for which they had originally
traveled to Syria.1020
When they returned to Medina, they narrated to the people what they had seen of Yazd.
They were soon shouting in the Prophet's (s) mosque: We are coming back from someone
who is faithless, drinks wine, plays lute, spends nights with mean people and singing maids,
and abandons prayers.1121
People asked 'Abd Allh b. Hanzala: What news have you brought? He said: I am coming
back from a man with whom I would have fought, I swear by Allah, if my children were not
with me. People said: We heard that Yazd has given you money and other gifts. 'Abd
Allh said: That is true. I accepted it only for preparing forces against him. This way 'Abd
Allh went on to instigate people against Yazd and they followed him.12
Ab al-Fid', one of the historians, puts it this way:
What fuelled the battle of Harrah was that a group of people went to Damascus to visit
Yazd b. Mu'wiyah. Yazd honored them, gave them gifts, and granted about a hundred
thousand dirhams to 'Abd Allh b. Hanzala b. Ab 'mir, a dignitary from Medina. When the
group returned to Medina, they talked to the people about what they had seen of Yazd drinking wine, vices, and other sins and injustices and immoralities, the greatest of which
were abandoning prayers due to being drunk.13
Tabar puts it in this way:
Upon returning to Medina, the group reproached Yazd among themselves, cursed him,
and said: We come back from someone who does not have faith, drinks wine, plays lute and
the maids sing for him; he plays with dogs and keeps company with the mean people and
they attacked him and demanded him to either surrender to the son of Sumayya (Ibn
Ziyd) or fight. Husayn ('a) knew that his companions were few in number but preferred
dignified death to a degraded life. May God bless Husayn ('a) and debase his killer.2535
One of the writers of Arab history wrote in an analysis on the tragedy of Karbal that
Husayn b. 'Al's blood was more than anything else effective in the development of Sh'
thought to the extent that Sh'sm may be said to be reborn on the tenth of Muharram. As
the later events revealed, this issue was among the factors that undermined the
foundations of the Umayyid's government.26
W Husayna!(Alas O Muhammad, Alas O Husayn!), just like the day when the Holy Prophet
(s) departed from the world. No day ever passed by for the Muslims more bitter and no
cries of mourning and lamentation more severe than that day.27
After the people left town and went to Imam Zayn al-'Abidn ('a) and others who were
returning with them, the Imam delivered a very moving sermon. Some people, such as
Sawhn b. Sa'sa'a, apologized for not assisting Imam Husayn ('a) and Imam Zayn al-'Abidn
('a) accepted their apologies.28
Imam Zayn al-'Abidn's ('a) words left deep impact on the people of Medina and made them
feel that they had neglected to defend the sanctity of the Messenger of Allah (s)!
Ab Mikhnaf wrote:
It was Friday that the caravan of the Ahl al-Bayt ('a) arrived near Medina. Imam Zayn al'Abidn ('a) sent Bashir b. Jazlam towards Medina to inform the people. He entered Medina
and informed the people of the arrival of Ahl al-Bayt ('a) by his poem. With this news, even
the women who were behind the veils came out of their houses, wearing black garments
and weeping with cries. I saw no man or woman except that they were weeping, lamenting
and reprimanding; all the Hashemite and non-Hashemite women were weeping.
On Friday, the Ahl al-Bayt ('a) arrived in Medina and the Friday preacher was delivering his
sermon, mentioning what had befallen Husayn ('a) and his companions and adding even
further to the lamentations and sorrows of people so that some were weeping and some
moaning. That day all the people of Medina went toward Ahl al-Bayt ('a) just like the day
when the Prophet (s) had departed from this world. The poets among them were reciting
their poems and elegies, and the people of Medina held public mourning and sorrowful
gatherings for fifteen days for Imam Husayn ('a) and the martyrs of Karbala.
On the other hand, Zaynab al-Kubr (sa) and the mothers of the martyrs of Karbal, each
one of them created their own impressive gathering in the widely span social milieu of
Medina by individually narrating their experiences of events of the 'shr tragedy and
what they had seen on the way to Kfa and Syria and in Yazd's court.
Following are the words of Hadrat Zaynab (sa), the daughter of 'Al ('a), addressed in the
early hours of her arrival in Medina to a mass gathering of mourning women who had
encircled and accompanied her into the city. She took advantage of the poetry to penetrate
deep into the hearts and minds of her listeners, as she knew very well that the Arab
women's memory would readily preserve them and recite them like their soothing
cradlesongs to their babies. Those lines are rendered as follows:
What answer will you give when the Prophet asks you:
What did you do as my last Ummah after my demise
To my progeny and my household?
Some have been taken captives and some were immersed in their blood!
Is it my reward for guiding and leading you to the Way of God?
That you oppress my household to such an extent?2939
with the Caliphate of Uthmn b. 'Affn (who was from Umayyid clan), and reached their
extremes during the reign of Yazd b. Mu'wiyah.
The previous Caliphs usually had at their disposal some consultants from among the
companions and the erudite for administering the Muslim community. Yazd, however, had
gathered around him some of his jokers and drunkard cronies, who were of his age, as
consultants and administrators. This action was obviously intolerable to those who were
foremost on the path of faith at that time and to the Ansr and Muhjirin and their
descendents.
The nearest in mindset to Yazd for the people of Medina was likely to be the governor of
Medina about whom Tabar wrote:
'Uthmn b. Muhammad b. Ab Sufyn, who was appointed as the governor of Medina after
Wald, was regarded as an inexperienced teenager.30
Before 'Uthmn b. Muhammad b. Ab Sufyn, another person known as Wald b. 'Uqba had
been appointed by Yazd as the governor of Hijz who was strongly criticized by people and
about whom Ibn. Zubayr sent the following letter to Yazd:
You have sent over us a rough and harsh man who does not care at all about justice and
truthfulness and pays no attention to the well-wishers and the wise; whereas if you had
sent a mild-mannered person, we hoped that he would make the hard and complicated
tasks much easier.314141
It was after such remarks and complains that Yazd discharged Wald b. 'Uqba from office
and appointed 'Uthmn b. Muhammad b. Ab Sufyn, who was an arrogant, inexperienced,
and heedless youth, as the governor of Hijz32, and the tragedy of Harrah took place while
he was the governor of Medina.33
Surprisingly enough, 'Uthmn b. Muhammad b. Ab Sufyn was simultaneously shouldering
two heavy posts, i.e., the governorship of Medina and Mecca which Yazd had entrusted to
this raw and inexperienced youth!34
All these factors were in fact creating impulses and subtle reactions that were adding
together and awaiting a proper moment to burst out like an explosion. That moment came
up when Ibn Mn, the fully authorized representative of Mu'wiyah (and who continued
working in that position in Yazid's reign), for collecting taxes and properties in Medina, tried
to deliver the collected possessions out of Harrah to the governor of Hijz. It was at this
point that the Medinan protesters blocked his way and told him: This much property that
you are taking out of Medina does not belong to you and Mu'wiyah; we confiscate this
property.3545
Ibn Mn reported the confiscation to 'Uthmn b. Muhammad b. Ab Sufyn who was then
the ruler of Mecca and Medina.
'Uthmn summoned some representatives from Medina for negotiations. A number of Ansr
and Quraysh met 'Uthmn and stated that the property belonged to the people of Medina
and that Mu'wiyah had purchased our property at a low price during the time of our
poverty and economic pressure and he had not paid our due rights during his reign.
The dispute dragged on to the extent that the governor of Medina threatened the
representatives and said: This action of yours is rooted in internal grudges and there is no
end to it. I will report the issue to Yazd himself.36
The governor of Medina reported the story in a letter to Syria and instigated Yazd against
Nu'mn:
O Nu'mn! Yazd is not a Muslim, because he drinks wine day and night; he does not offer
obligatory prayers, he practices debauchery, and he deems as permissible shedding the
blood of the descendents of the Prophet (s); and you know that no other Caliph has not
done what Yazd has been doing. He does not deserve to be the leader of Muslim
community.1360
As soon as 'Uthmn b. Muhammad timidly read Yazd's letter to the people of Medina, 'Abd
Allh b. Mut' and some other people began to curse and use abusive language. When they
found out that Yazd had dispatched an army to suppress them, they made a firm decision
to stand up and fight against it.1461
After the people of Medina decisively resolved to fight against the army of Syria, the
Umayyids were ousted out of town, either on their own demand or as deemed advisable by
Medinan fighters, and settled in a place called Dh Khushub15 located at a day's journey
from Medina.16
Marwn b. Hakam was among the expelled. However, he was happy for not having stayed
in Medina because he knew that if they had stayed in Medina, they would have been more
at a loss than otherwise. Thus, Marwn told his son 'Abd al-Malik:
O My son! It seems that the people of Medina have permitted us to leave without
consulting each other or without enough deliberation, or they have expelled us from
Medina.
'Abd al-Malik asked his father why he said so?
Marwn answered: The very fact that the people did not kill or take us captive is enough to
be happy, for if they took us captive, they would keep us as hostages and would kill us in
case of invasion of Syrian army! Now we are worried that they would realize their mistake
and change their minds to chase after us!1764
1. Hanzala b. Ab mir, a famous companion of the Prophet (s), was a youth who got
married to Jamla, Abd Allh b. Ubayy's daughter, consummated with her and Abd Allh's
embryo was conceived but he did not get the chance to perform the major ablution (ghusl)
in the morning as he had to proceed to the battle of Uhud on the orders of Prophet (s) and
was martyred. The Prophet (s) told the people that the angels had performed the ghusl on
him (Ibn Sad, Tabaqt, vol. 5, p. 46; Dinawari, al-Akhbr al-Tiwl, p. 310).
2. Ibn Sad, Tabaqt, vol. 5, p. 47; Qazwn, Muhammad Husain, Riyd al-Ahzn, p. 176.
3. Dinawari, al-Akhbr al-Tiwl, p. 264; Maqdis, Al-Bad wa al-Tarkh, vol. 1, p. 15.
4. Ibn Atham Kfi, Al-Futh, vol. 3, p. 179; Masd, Murj al-Dhahab, vol. 3, p. 69.
5. Ibn Sad, Tabaqt, vol. 5, p. 47 and 166; Ibn Qutayba, Al-Imma wa al-Siysa, vol. 1, p.
208; Yaqb, Tarkh, vol. 2, p. 250; Ibn Athr, Al-Kmil f al-Trkh, vol. 4, p. 111; Fakhr,
Tarkh, p. 115; Ibn Khaldn, Trkh, vol. 2, p. 37.
6. Yaqb, Tarkh, vol. 2, p. 250; Bayhaq, Al-Mahsin wa al-Masw, vol. 1, p. 46.
7. Ibn Qutayba, Al-Imma wa al-Siysa, vol. 2, p. 9; Bayhaq, Al-Mahsin wa al-Masw, vol.
1, p. 46; Ibn Abd Rabbih, al-Iqd al-Fard, vol. 5, p. 137; Ab al-Faraj al-Isfahn, Al-Aghn,
vol. 1, p. 25; Ibn Athr, Al-Kmil f al-Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 111; Samhd, Waf al-Waf, vol. 1,
p. 127.
8. Azraq, Akhbr Makkat al-Musharrafa, vol. 1, p. 139.
9. Ibn Qutayba, Al-Imma wa al-Siysa, vol. 1, p. 208.
10. Tabar, Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 371.
11. Ibn Qutayba, Al-Imma wa al-Siysa, vol. 2, p. 9; Bayhaq, Al-Mahsin wa al-Masw,
vol. 1, p. 46.
12. Nuwayr, Nahyat al-Irab, vol. 6, p. 217.
13. Balam, Tarkh Nma-yi Tabar, vol. 2, p. 719.
14. Ibn Qutayba, Al-Imma wa al-Siysa, vol. 1, p. 208.
15. Yqt Hamaw, Mujam al-Buldn, vol. 2, p. 372.
16. Ibn Qutayba, Al-Imma wa al-Siysa, vol. 1, p. 208; Ibn Athr, Al-Kmil f al-Tarkh, vol.
4, p. 111.
17. Ab al-Faraj al-Isfahn, Al-Aghn, vol. 1, p. 24.
Yazd ordered the government's officials as well as the ordinary people to be encouraged to
participate in this conflict.
The state heralds were announcing in the streets and public places:
O People! Mobilize for fighting against the people of Hijz and receive your wage!
Whoever volunteered would receive one hundred dinars cash right on the spot. Those for
whom only money was important immediately agreed. After a short while about twelve
thousand individuals gathered.7
Some other historians have reported the number of Syrian army as amounting to ten
thousand troops.
The age span of the troops was between twenty to fifty years. All required equipment had
been provided for them, so that many camels were carrying necessary equipment and
weapons of the army.872
Some other historians have put it this way: Yazd ordered people to prepare to go to Hijz;
twenty thousand infantry troops and seven thousand cavalries prepared. Yazd gave two
hundred dinars to the mounted and a hundred dinars to the infantry troops as award and
ordered them to move along with Muslim b. 'Uqba.973
Yazd accompanied Muslim b. 'Uqba and the Syrian army for about half a Farsakh (2.8 km)
to see them off.10
Among the army, some Syrian Christians were also seen who had prepared to fight against
the people of Medina.11
1. Ibn Atham Kfi, Al-Futh, vol. 3, p. 179.
2. Amr b. Sad b. s b. Umayyah b. Abd Shams, renowned as Ashdaq is the same person
who was the governor of Medina in 61 A.H. (680 C.E.) when Imam Husain (a) was
martyred. (Ibn Sad, Tabaqt, vol. 5, p. 176
3. Ibn Athr, Al-Kmil f al-Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 11.
4. Ibn Atham Kfi, Al-Futh, vol. 5, p. 180.
5. Ibid, vol. 5, p. 180; Ibn Athr, Al-Kmil f al-Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 112; Samhd, Waf alWaf, vol. 1, p. 130.
6. Dinawari, al-Akhbr al-Tiwl, p. 310; Ibn Kathr, Al-Bidyat wa al-Nihya, vol. 6, p. 234.
7. Ibn Athr, Al-Kmil f al-Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 112; Ibn Taghr Bird, Al-Nujm al-Zhira, vol. 1,
p. 261; Samhd, Waf al-Waf, vol. 1, p. 128.
8. Ibn Qutayba, Al-Imma wa al-Siysa, vol. 1, p. 209; Ab al-Fid, Al-Mukhtasar f Akhbr
al-Bashar, vol. 1, p. 192.
9. Dinawari, al-Akhbr al-Tiwl, p. 310; Tabar, Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 371; Ibn Atham Kfi, AlFuth, vol. 5, p. 180.
10. Masd, Murj al-Dhahab, vol. 2, p. 95; Ibn Athr, Al-Kmil f al-Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 56;
Balam, Tarkh Nma-yi Tabar, vol. 4, p. 279.
11. Philip Hitti, Tarkh al-Arab, vol. 1, p. 248.
Since Muslim b. 'Uqba was sick at the time of departure to Medina and was unable to mount
the horse, he was placed on a couch and carried on slaves' shoulders.1 Yazd recommended
him to name Husayn b. Numayr Sakn as his deputy in case any problem would arise for
him.2 As for the people of Medina, he advised him as follows:
Invite the people of Medina three times. If they accept, it is better; but if they do not, in
case you triumph over them, massacre them for three days. Whatever there might be in
that city - including properties, human beings, animals, and weapons - would be lawful for
the troops. Do not prevent the people of Syria from doing what they want to do with their
enemy. When the three days' period is over, cease the massacre and plunder and ask
people to swear allegiance to be Yazd's slaves! When you are done with Medina, move
towards Mecca.3
1. Ibn Qutayba, Al-Imma wa al-Siysa, vol. 2, p. 9.
2. Ibn Athr, Al-Kmil f al-Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 112; Azraq, Akhbr Makkat al-Musharrafa, vol.
1, p. 139.
3. Dinawari, al-Akhbr al-Tiwl, p. 264; Ibn Atham Kfi, Al-Futh, vol. 5, p. 180; Ibn Athr,
Al-Kmil f al-Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 112; Ibn al-Ward, Tatimmat al-Mukhtasar, vol. 1, p. 233;
Samhd, Waf al-Waf, vol. 1, p. 128; Azraq, Akhbr Makkat al-Musharrafa, vol. 1, p.
139; Ab al-Fid, Al-Mukhtasar f Akhbr al-Bashar, vol. 1, p. 192.
mission and during his business travel to Syria, met the Christian Monk and the latter
recognized on his features, the signs of prophethood),6
7. Karak,
8. Ma'n,
9. Hism,
10. Dht al-Manr (the beginning of Syrian territory from Medina),
11. Lajn,
12. Saragh (a village near Tabk),
13. Dht Haj,
14. Taym' (name of a river north of Tabk),
15. Hajar,
16. Wd al-Qur,
17. 'Ulm,
18. Junayna,
19. Janb,
20. Ruhba,
21. Dh al-Marwa,
22. Marr,
23. Jurf,
24. Suwayd,
25 Hudayya,
26. Dh Khushub.
Obviously, the above-mentioned stages are the known villages and townships on the way
between Syria and Medina and it does not mean that the distance between each one of
them is a day's journey.
However, when the Syrian army reached Wd al-Qur, they met with the Umayyids who
were expelled or had escaped from Medina.
Muslim b. 'Uqba first inquired about the military preparedness and spiritual conditions of
the people of Medina and the number of their fighters in order to plan how to penetrate into
Medina and triumph over the people.
Muslim b. 'Uqba asked Marwn b. Hakam how to triumph over the people of Medina.
Marwn answered: The number of Medinans is more than your troops, but not all of them
have enough arms. On the other hand, they lack enough motivation, purpose, and goal and
are unable to withstand the swords.
Marwn b. Hakam said to Muslim b. 'Uqba: Your biggest problem is the trench they have
dug around Medina to block your way and in order to guard them they have assigned their
resolute men who will not easily leave the trench. I know how to break up this blockade but
I will reveal it to you in due course. 7
Muslim b. 'Uqba did not content himself with Marwn's statements and tried to obtain more
accurate information about Medina from the Umayyids, but they refused to give more
information with the pretext that we have taken an oath to the people of Medina not to
give you any information, but 'Abd al-Malik, son of Marwn, has not taken any oath of
secrecy and you can acquire more information from him.886
The Umayyids were apparently afraid that Yazd's army will not be able to conquer Medina,
so they did not wish to endanger the prospects of their stay as well as their property and
lands in Medina; otherwise, the Umayyids were not such people as to keep their oath.
As recommended by the Umayyids, Muslim b. 'Uqba consulted the young and
inexperienced 'Abd al-Malik in a private session, and asked him about the people of Medina,
their insurgency, and how to confront them. Declaring his readiness for any cooperation,
'Abd al-Malik said:
In my opinion, you must advance to the palm groves near Medina and do not hasten to
enter the city. Settle the army next to the palm groves and order the troops to rest and
enjoy the date palms and other facilities available there. After a one day rest, move toward
Medina. You should not enter the city from the west; rather, you should choose an entrance
in which Medina may lie on your left. This necessitates that you enter the battle with the
people of Medina through Harrah which is on the eastern side of Medina, for if you fight
with those people during the first half of the day, the sun will be behind you, and hurt the
eyes of the Medinan fighters and block their visibility. This way, you will see them well, but
they will be dazzled by the glittering of your swords, lances, and helmets.
Muslim b. 'Uqba welcomed and admired 'Abd al-Malik's advice.987
For the itinerary of Syrian army from Damascus to Medina, see the following map.
provoking people for battle against Yazd and the Umayyid rule, he now undertook the high
command of the combatant forces in the defense of Medina.
In fact, the role that Ibn Zubayr had undertaken in Mecca was played by 'Abd Allh b.
Hanzala in Medina.
With the Syrian army approaching Medina, 'Abd Allh b. Hanzala called people to the
Prophet's (s) Pulpit in Masjid al-Nab and asked all those who accompanied him, to swear
allegiance to him until the end of their lives.
The people of Medina swore an enduring allegiance to him and said that they would be with
him to the last of their lives. 'Abd Allh mounted the pulpit and after praising God said:
O people! You have revolted for the sake of religion, so try to successfully come out of this
trial and be graced with God's forgiveness, and may you enjoy the Paradise!
Be ready to fight with all your strength and power!
Let me inform you that the Syrians have halted and camped near Medina and that Marwn
b. Hakam and the Umayyids are also with them. If God wishes, He will punish him for
breaking the pledge he had made at the Prophet's (s) tomb! The people then began to
curse and swear out loud together at Marwn and the Umayyids and called Marwn a frog
son of a frog!1)
'Abd Allh then called people to silence and peace, saying: Swearing does not solve any
problem; so, prepare for battle, since, by God, no people have ever proceeded with
truthfulness except that they triumphed by Divine assistance.
Then, 'Abd Allh raised his hands to the sky and said: O Lord! We trust You and have faith
in You and rely on You, ask You to help us triumph.295
The historians have elsewhere reported that 'Abd Allh b. Hanzala also said:
O People of Medina! We did not revolt except for the reason that Yazd is an adulterous,
drunkard, and prayerless (denouncer of Salt) man; and tolerating his rule will cause
descent of Divine punishment. If I would be left alone and no one would help me, still I
won't give up revolting against Yazd.39696
Meanwhile, Muslim b. 'Uqba, who was seeking to find a way to penetrate into and dominate
over Medina, got the chance to address the people of Medina by sending them the following
message:
Amr al-Mu'minn Yazd sends his regards to you and says that you are his clan and
kinsmen. Fear God! Listen to my words and obey. There are two bounties for you with me in
my covenant to God: one in summer and the other one in winter. I have made a covenant
to God to keep the price of wheat for you at the same rate as it is for us, which was one
dirham for every s' (3 kg.). As for the bounty that 'Amr b. Sa'd Ashdaq has taken away
from you, it is upon me to return it to you.497
This message had no impact on the people of Medina, because, although there were some
people among them whose religious motivations were overshadowed by their material,
tribal, and emotional motives, a large number of the pioneers of this uprising were decisive
and purposeful people who were mainly motivated to overthrow the Umayyid rule and to
fight against Yazd as a person notorious for his incompetence and irreligiousness.
Thus, in response to Muslim b. 'Uqba, they said: We have removed Yazd from Caliphate
just like a shoe that we remove from out feet.5
Nevertheless, Muslim b. 'Uqba gave the Medinans three days' time to finally make up their
mind.699
Suffering from illness, Muslim b. 'Uqba avoided attacking Medina for three days, and then
since he did not receive a favorable answer from the Medinans, finally decided to overcome
them by force and violence and subdue them to Yazd.
Evidence shows that Muslim b. 'Uqba's hesitation for fighting the Medinans was not merely
for avoiding slaughtering, rather, he was commissioned to go to Mecca after suppressing
the Medinans' revolt in order to suppress Ibn. Zubayr's revolt as well. Muslim b. 'Uqba
seemed to fear that if the battle with the Medinans would become difficult and lengthy, the
fighting energy of Syrian forces would get exhausted and then he would not be able to
confront Ibn. Zubayr and gain victory over him.
That was because fighting with Ibn Zubayr in Mecca was in many aspects more difficult and
risky than fighting with the people of Medina. First of all Mecca was a Divine Sanctuary on
which invasion and launching a military campaign would cost the invaders dearly; and
secondly, the distance between Mecca and Medina and its scorching and dry desert would
severely wear out Syrian forces. That was why Muslim b. 'Uqba in his last talk to the people
of Medina said: If you give up revolting and disobedience, I will get the chance to use all
the Syrian forces against Ibn Zubayr, who is an impious and rebellious man!
However, he was unaware of the fact that they not only approved of Ibn Zubayr but did not
allow the Syrian army to make any attempt to invade the Divine Sanctuary and attack that
Holy Land!7
1. With this appellation, people were in fact referring to a hadth from the Prophet (s) who
had used the epithet a frog son of a frog about Hakam and Marwn for their indecent
behavior. (Ibn Ab al-Hadd, Sharh Nahj al-Balgha, vol. 4, p. 71.
2. Ibn Sad, Tabaqt, vol. 5, p. 48; Ibn Qutayba, Al-Imma wa al-Siysa, vol. 1, p. 20.
3. Ibn Sad, Tabaqt, vol. 5, p. 47.
4. Ibn Qutayba, Al-Imma wa al-Siysa, vol. 2, p. 9; Tabar, Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 374.
5. Ibn Qutayba, Al-Imma wa al-Siysa, vol. 2, p. 9; Tabar, Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 374.
6. Ibid, vol. 4, p. 374; Ibn Athr, Al-Kmil f al-Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 114.
7. Tabar, Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 374; Ibn Athr, Al-Kmil f al-Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 114.
First the Syrian archers entered the battle. Ibn Hanzala told his troops: We are now
targeted by arrows; whoever wishes to enter paradise should sacrifice his life around this
banner - the banner of Medinans!
Upon Ibn Hanzala's speech, the self-sacrificing combatants accompanied him and got into a
fierce battle against the Syrian army and an unprecedented war broke out in that land.1
'Abd Allh b. Hanzala told his companions: It is true that your enemy has found the way to
fight, but I do not think they will be able to resist more than one hour. You are the Muhjirin
and the companions of the Prophet (s); I do not think God is more pleased with any other
people than you! Death is the indispensable destiny of all human beings, but no death is
superior to martyrdom; martyrdom is in front of you, take advantage of it!2
1. Tabar, Tarkh, vol. 2, p. 250; Ibn Athr, Al-Kmil f al-Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 117.
2. Ibid, vol. 4, p. 117.
is not exclusive to a particular group. O Husayn b. Numayr and O 'Abd Allh b. 'Idt Ash'ar!
Dismount your horses along with your army!
They all dismounted their horses and advanced on food.
The Syrians were attacking from all directions and killing the people of Medina. The battle
was going on to the advantage of the Syrians, overshadowing the vigorous resistance of the
defenders of Medina.
'Abd Allh b. Hanzala was striking his sword and reciting following couplets:
Far from those who seek corruption and rebellion and turn away from the truth and the
signs of guidance;
The Merciful God will not keep anyone away from His Mercy except the disobedient.3120
Normally, a combatant at that time in history would brag with such utterances in the battle
field when he wants to express his goal of offence or defense. 'Abd Allh b. Hanzala was
seeking to encourage the people of Medina to resist on the one hand and to remind the
Syrians of his motive and to resist the Umayyid distorters of religion, on the other.
Muslim b. 'Uqba ordered 'Abd Allh b. 'Idt Ash'ar to move towards 'Abd Allh b. Hanzala
and his companions with fifteen archers and when they were close enough, start shooting
arrows at them.4121
Thus, finally, 'Abd Allh b. Hanzala fell on the ground and was killed by Syrian troops and
with his death the remaining resisting defenders of Medina broke up. The Syrian army
chased the Medinans and killed several people in this way.5
The sun was setting while the dark shadow of the avaricious and revengeful army of Syria
was weighing down on the defenseless people of Medina and setting the monster of death,
horror, and plunder over their women, children, and life!
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
C.E.)4, and after three days respite, the Syrian army's invasion of Medina started from
Harrah region at dawn on 27th of Dh'l Hijja, and later, on the same day, the defenders of
Medina were killed at the end of the same day, and the Syrian army seized the city of
Medina overnight.
Narration of all the aspects of the battle of Harrah must be considered on one side and this
tragic part (the crimes of the Syrian army in Medina) of the history of Yazd's Caliphate, as
the heaviest and the most heinous of all the dreadful events that took place in this battle,
on the other.
Dnawar puts it this way:
Entrance of Syrian army into Medina took place on 27th of Dh'l Hijja 63 A.H. and Medina
was in the clutches of Syrian army until the rise of the new crescent of Muharram.5
As Yazd b. Mu'wiyah had advised, Muslim b. 'Uqba ordered the Syrian army after
conquering Medina: Your hands are open! Do whatever you wish! Plunder Medina for three
days.6
This way, the city of Medina was allowed as permissible to the Syrian troops to exploit and
plunder in whatever way they wished, leaving no man or woman on their way secure from
their carnage, killing the people, and pillaging their properties.7129
More grievous than the Syrian's plundering and slaying the people of Medina and the
remaining generation of the companions of Prophet (s) as well as the Muhjirin and Ansr,
was the rash and avaricious Syrians troops' assault upon the chastity of the women of
Medina!
If we accept that the Syrian army was consisted of 27 thousand armed men8 aged between
20 to 50 years old, we will find out how disastrous could the invasion of this number of
troops have been on a town surrounded by numerous trenches and rugged lands. And if we
agree with a number of historians who have estimated the Syrian army in the battle of
Harrah to be the least of 10 thousand fighting men, still we can guess the extension of this
catastrophe that took place in Medina.
The ten thousand young fighting men, who have for several days traversed the long
distance between Syria and Medina with much hardship, overwhelmed the enemy in a
single day of aggressive and severely harsh hit-and-fighting, and given full permission by
their commander and central government for any action they wished to do, now at the end
of the day stepped into houses whose men are either killed or escaped or have raised their
hands up as a sign of surrender to be taken as captives.
How would have such ravenous and rash men treated the helpless and unprotected
women, girls and children?!
We do not need to merely guess and imagine the extension of the tragedy; because the
historians have explicitly recorded what had taken place:
Thousands of women were assaulted in the invasion of the Syrians into Medinat al-Nab (s),
and months after the battle of Harrah, thousands of babies were born whose fathers were
unknown, hence were named children of Harrah! The sinister aftermaths of this ethicohuman diaster left its ominous impact on families and the marriages of their daughters,
bringing in many individual and social problems that are too heavy to be expressed by any
pen.9131
Streets of Medina were filled with the bodies of the killed, blood stains covered the way up
to the Prophet's (s) Mosque10, children were killed in their mothers' laps11, and the old
companions of the Apostle of Allah (s) were persecuted and disgraced.12134
shed light on their stance as well as their role during the course of Medinans uprising and
their revolt against the Umayyid rule.
The importance of this issue is obvious to any researcher of the history of Islam who has
studied and analyzed the tragedy of Harrah, or is going to do so. Particular reference to the
time of this event from a trans-historical and religious aspect should be kept in mind.
The tragedy of Harrah and Imam Zayn al-'Abidn's ('a) stance toward it is significantly
beyond just a historical research for the followers and adherents of the Prophet (s) and His
Ahl al-Bayt ('a), as the Imam's negative or positive or even indifferent reaction towards
such affairs would on one hand be a religious frame of reference to them, and on the other
hand, can be used as a basis for political and legal opinions in their religious and social life.
What we have said so far about the regretful tragedy of Harrah is a documented historical
look at the authentic reports that the historians have recorded. However, a study of the role
and position of Imam Zayn al-'Abidn ('a) in the protest rallies of the people of Medina
against the Umayyid's rule is possible from two different aspects.
A merely historical outlook
A religious and ideological view
witnessed at close quarters to himself, with all their high status and position never assisted
his grandfather 'Al, his uncle Hasan b. 'Al ('a), or his father Imam Husayn b. 'Al ('a) and
depended on their own understanding and knowledge in ups and downs of the incidents
rather than on the Ahl al-Bayt ('a)? Or else, he did not feel obliged to accompany them due
to the weakness of this movement, or did not prevent them because of their inadvisablity?
Was Imam Zayn al-'Abidn ('a) entangled in a political and social seclusion and pursuing
monasticism? Or did he not have the morale for getting up again into conflict with the
Umayyid ruling system? Or did he firmly decide not to fight against the corruption of the
rulers and their tyranny like the manner and lifestyle (sra) of his grandfather 'Al b. Ab
Tlib ('a), his uncle Hasan b. 'Al ('a), and his father Husayn b. 'Al ('a)?!
Once the historian wants to step into research and analysis and then make a judgment
about the interference and non-interference of Imam Zayn al-'Abidn ('a) in the tragedy of
Harrah, he would be facing all the above questions and should have answers to all of them,
presenting authentic reasons for every view he adopts.
The simplest analysis is to regard the Imam's ('a) silence as his impartiality in this event
and view that impartiality as a result of his abandoning duty and path of martyrdom and
resistance, and his compromise with the rules in order to survive. But such an analysis
would be made by an ignorant and biased person, as the past personality traits of Imam
Zayn al-'Abidn ('a) does not validate such an analysis. Despite his exhausted body due to
the wounds from the heavy chains fastened to his body and although being surrounded by
Yazd's troops and supporters and in a land where 'Al ('a) has always been cursed, he stood
up before the arrogant Umayyid ruler and cried out:
O Yazd! Are you threatening me to murder?! Have you not learned the fact that being
killed in the way of the Truth is an eternal success and a tradition among us and martyrdom
is a dignity for us?!
Did the Imam ('a) not utter these words after the tragedy of Karbal; was he not carrying
the deep wounds of the memory of 'Ashr on his body and soul when he expressed
himself so courageously?!
Was it by any means possible that such a free-spirited, brave, and noble figure would give
up all those highly influencing and chrished memories within several months and come to
compromise and lip-service with the murderers of his father and their accomplices and
become indifferent to their defeat and destruction?!
Was it not the case that whenever the eyes of his holiness were cast on fresh water, he
would weep to keep alive the memory of the severe thirst of the martyrs of Karbal and the
tyrannies they suffered and the gravity of the crimes committed by the Umayyids, leaving
deep impact on the souls and emotions?
Was he not the one who in his supplications would breathe the love of the Prophet's (s)
descendents into the souls and hearts of the monotheists, and this way would trouble the
Umayyid's slumber? Was he not the one whose brilliant thoughts and steadfast personality
inspired such great warriors as Zayd b. 'Al b. al-Husayn and Yahy b. Zayd who bravely
fought against Umayyid injustice and oppression? And from among his progeny such Imams
and leaders were born who never compromised with the oppressive powers, used every
opportunity to expose the real face of the tyrants, and were all killed as martyrs?
If the historians and analyzers of this historical event take into consideration all these facts
together in an integrated way and all the aspects, they will not accept the nave statements
and the opportunistic reports of those unfamiliar with the school of divine leadership
(Wilyat).
Thus, if Imam Zayn al-'Abidn ('a) did not go along with the uprising of Medina, it has been
because:
Firstly, he had identified various goals and motives among the people of Medina all of which
were not religious.
Secondly, the Imam ('a) did not see the condition as appropriate for confronting the
Umayyid government and considered the revolt of the people of Medina as paving the way
for massive bloodshed and transgression upon the chastity of Muslim women. This was in
the same way as his noble father, Husayn ('a), left Medina during the night, it was because
he did not want his blood to be shed in the Sanctuary of the Holy Prophet (s) and so his
martyrdom took place in a situation that would convey the everlasting message to the
subsequent generation.
Thirdly, if he prevented people from uprising honestly and outrightly, it would so happen
that the people would take the Imam's words as a result of his past disappointment of
fighting against Yazd! Nevertheless, Imam Zayn al-'Abidn ('a) practically showed the
people of Medina and those who were mindful of the Imam's viewpoints and obedient to
him that they should not get involved in this course of events.
Fourthly, the method of fighting adopted by the inhabitants of Medina against the Syrian
army was predicted to be inefficient; for, although in the battle of Ahzb, the Muslims
utilized a similar method and triumphed in the early stage, the circumstances had changed
over time. In the tragedy of Harrah, the people of Medina neither enjoyed the empathy and
coordination of the Prophet's (s) time, nor had a leader like the Prophet (s).
In addition to the above, the presence of the women and children in Medina had a very
important impact leading to the defeat of their uprising, as the combatants had to abandon
the battlefront and go back to town for the fear of the Syrians' invasion of their houses.
Thus, Imam Zayn al-'Abidn ('a) had practically warned against this critical event and
demonstrated to the inhabitants by having his family and relatives taken away from Medina
and transferred to the region of Yanbu'1.
In conclusion, the position that Imam Zayn al-'Abidn ('a) practically adopted was very well
calculated and in the light of the above-mentioned considerations, the most logical one,
since, in a short while, this reality was to be revealed to the inhabitants of Medina.
has explicitly appointed him for and other people have to obey him, take his words and
actions as criteria for their beliefs and behavior, and do not seek precedence over him in
thought and practice.
From this perspective, Imam Zayn al-'Abidn ('a) had acted according to a superhuman
obligation, and those of the Medinans, who due to their lack of belief in Wilyat and
Imamate (divine leadership of the Imams among Ahl al-Bayt - 'a) or for any other reasons
stepped into this uprising, suffered great loss.
Here, the question arises that whether the Medinans' uprising was rightful and their killed
ones can be regarded as martyrs, or their uprising had been a rebellion and revolt against
an Islamic ruler?
1. Yqt Hamaw, Mujam al-Buldn, vol. 5, p. 449.
All these indicated the incompetence of the Medina's sucessively appointed governors and
the unrest of the people of that city.
However, fighting tactics of Medinan combatants were not accompanied with crime and
betrayal, as they had the power to take hostage the governor of Medina, Marwn b. Hakam,
and the Umayyid's proxies and kill them in case of the invasion of Medina by the Syrian
army; but they did not do so and let all of them leave Medina on the condition, verbally
undertaken, that they would not help the enemy and will not guide the Syrian army into
Medina. (This indicated the presence of traitors among the combatants as well as weak
planning for the defence of Medina and its inhabitants.)
It is reported in some sources that the people of Medina expelled the Umayyid's cronies and
its members and their relatives from Medina and assaulted and battered them. Firstly,
these reports are not compatible with the Umayyid's taking an oath next to the Prophet's
(s) mausoleum, as taking an oath demanded a peaceful and sociable atmosphere.
Secondly, if we accept as true the report of expelling and battering, still it will never be
comparable to the slaughter and plunder that normally takes place during such events and
in addition its similarity to the Syrian army's cruel treatment of the inhabitants of Medina is
impossible and can never be made!
Something that remains to be researched and examined about the legitimacy of Medina
revolt is that whether the pioneers of this uprising had taken necessary measures for
preserving the Muslims' lives and honor or they left the sanctity of Medina, and the
Muslims' lives, properties, and families exposed to the plunders and aggressions by the
most malicious people and the most wicked army commanders of the Muslim history!
It seems that this had been Imam Zayn al-'Abidn's ('a) most important concern. He,
perhaps, didn't view the time, circumstances, and the battle style as appropriate and
foresaw its horrible outcomes. For this reason, as an Imam and a socio-religious leader, he
did not deem advisable for the Muslim community to openly step into this conflict.
But, that's how such men as 'Abd Allh b. Hanzala and others influential in the Medina
uprising had found the situation and circumstances to be, and whether they were guilty of
any negligence in their evaluations of the circumstances and the battle style, is something
not adequately dealt with in historical sources. We have no reason to scriutinize this issue,
as a tradition related from the Holy Prophet (s) says:
When the Prophet (s) left Medina in one of his journeys, upon reaching Harrat az-Zahra1
he stopped for a while and said: Indeed we belong to Allah and to Allah do we indeed
return. Hearing this from his holiness at the outset of a trip made people in his company
worried. 'Umar b. al-Khattb, from among those present, asked: O Messenger of Allah (s)!
What caused you to say this?
The Prophet (s) replied: 'My istirj' saying inn li-llh wa inn ilaihi rji'n Al-Qur'an, :2
156 is not because of this trip that we are about to start; rather, it is because the good ones
of my ummah after my companions will be killed in this stony land.'2
The words and slogans of 'Abd Allh b. Hanzala on one hand however this tradition on the
other hand indicates that the pioneers of the Medina revolt and the active combatants had
good intentions and right motivations and their move per se was not out of vain desires,
seeking power, or corruption, for if it were so, the Prophet (s) would not have called them
the good ones of my ummah.
The excellence and honor of those killed in the Medina uprising and their being rewarded by
God is unrelated to the fact that Imam Zayn al-'Abidn ('a) as a spiritual figure who had
been certain about the uprising as being ineffectual or ill-fated would have felt obliged not
to participate in this revolt and practically impart to those who had comprehended his
wilyat (divine leadership) what their duty was.
After all, whether the uprising and movement of the Medinans has been regarded as
rightful and their killed ones as martyrs, there is an inalienable truth here as to the Yazd
and Syrian army's treatment of the Medinans to be an irreligious and inhumane treatment
and that no justification can be accepted for the plunder of the property and violating the
chastity of the Muslim women.
Even if the people of Medina had rebelled against a government, they had not rebelled
against an Islamic government that the Muslims had voted for or had been legally and
religiously legitimized. Rather, they had rebelled against someone who had been notorious
for his debauchery, cruelities and injustice and had governed on the back of people by force
of spears and threats, who had inherited throne from his father, who in turn had stayed in
power over Syria by rising against the central rule and the legal Caliphate of 'Al b. Ab Tlib
('a) and in fact had rebelled against the elected rule of the Muslim community, launched
military campaigns, and gained political stability through deceit and treachery!
It is not surprising that the Umayyids and their cronies, who like hungry and gluttonous
camels, had been recklessly devouring the vast poessesions and properties of the Muslim
world at the expanse of the public treasury, would evidently consider any voice of protest
and dissidence as rebellion against the Muslims' Caliph and take it as tantamount to
apostasy and viewing it as absolutely lawful to shed the dissidents' blood, take away by
force or plunder their property, and violate the chastity of their women!
1. Name of a region, a mile away from the Mosque of the Prophet (s), where the Jews of
Medina lived (Samhd, Waf al-Waf, vol. 1, p. 64). It is possibly the same region from
where the Syrian army penetrated into Medina. As Wqid has related from Ibn Abbs,
when the Prophet (s) arrived in the Ban Abd al-Ashhal, he pointed to Harrah and uttered
the above statement.
2. The phrase after my companions may refer to spiritual status of those who were killed
in the uprising of Medina, or may point to the fact that they were one generation after
prophets companions.
details. On the other hand, it indicates that the recorded numbers and figures of the losses
and damages inflicted as result of the uprising of the Medinans and the invasion of Syrian
army over them are not exaggerated but accurate and realistic.
Some of the clans and tribes that had the greatest number of dead are as follows:
Quraysh, Ban Hshim and their confederates, ten killed
'Abd Manf clan and their confederates, eleven killed
Ban Qusayy clan and their confederates, nineteen killed
Ban Zuhra and his confederates, nineteen killed
'Udayy b. Ka'b and his confederates, thirteen killed
Bani Fahr and his confederates, twenty four killed
'Abd Allh b. Hanzala and seven of his children killed
Ban Mu'wiyah b. Mlik, twelve killed
Ban Najjr, fifty three killed
Ban Khazraj, twenty killed
Some historical sources have recorded the number of Ansr's killed to be 137 and the total
number killed of the Ansr and Quraysh to be 360. Besides the above-mentioned clans, a
number of other clans and tribes have been recorded that are too many to mention here
and the names mentioned below will suffice as typical sample, while referring the
researchers to the historical sources for further study.1
1. See: Ibn Sad, Tabaqt, vol. 5, p. 46; Zubayr, Musab, Nasab-i Quraysh, p. 88; Masd,
Murj al-Dhahab, vol. 3, p. 70; Nuwayr, Nahyat al-Irab, vol. 6, p. 227; Zirkl, Al-Alm, vol.
5, p. 355; Ibn Khayyt, Tarkh, p. 293-314.
Ab Bakr b. 'Abd Allh b. Ja'far b. Ab Tlib (who was among the executed).
Fadl b. 'Abbs b. Hrith b. 'Abd al-Muttalib.
'Abd Allh b. Nawfil b. Harith b. 'Abd al-Muttalib.
'Abbs b. 'Utba b. Ab Lahab.9153
4.
5.
'Amr and
Wald, sons of Yazd b. Ukht al-Namir
'Abd Allh b. 'Abd al-Rahmn b. Htib b. Ab Bulta'a from Namir al-Azd (tribe).
Usma b. Khiyr.
Ays, and
Ya'l, sons of al-Sar.
Ysuf b. Habb, from Ban Layth tribe.
Habb.
'Umar or 'Amr, sons of Khawwt.
Muhammad b. Bashr.
'Abd Allh b. Kulayb b. 'Ubayd who was injured in battle and died soon afterwards.
Muhammad, and
'Utaba or 'Ubayd, sons of Jubayr.
'Abd Allh ('Ubayd Allh), and
'Al', sons of Thbit.
S'ib b. 'Abd Allh.
Tha'laba, and
'mir, sons of Hrith b. Tha'laba.
Sa'd b. 'Abd Allh.
'Abd Allh b. Hazm b. 'Amr b. Umayya.
'Utba b. Ash'ath b. Ka'b.
2.
Sa'd b. Jubayr.
'Abd Allh b. Sa'd.
'Abbd,
S'ida, and
Ab Jubayra, sons of Sa'd.
'Amr,
Muhammad, and
Yazd, sons of Thbit b. Qays b. Khatm.
Muhammad b. Ab Namla b. Zurra.
12.
'Abd al-Malik, sons of Muhammad b. 'Amr b. Hazm.
13.
'Abd Allh ('Ubayd Allh) and Jbir and Mu'wiyah, sons of 'Amr b. Hazm. It is
said that along with Muhammad b. 'Amr b. Hazm, thirteen of his family members were also
killed.
14.
'Al' b. 'Abd Allh b. Raqm b. Nadla.
15.
'Amr b. Mu'all b. 'Amr.
16.
'Al' b. 'Abd Allh b. Nu'ay b. Nadla.
17.
Mlik b. Mu'dh b. 'Amr b. Qays.
18.
Muhammad b. 'Abd Allh b. 'Abd al-Rahmn b. Sa'd b. Zurra.
19.
Qays b. Sa'd b. 'Amr b. Suhayl.
20.
'Abd al-Rahmn b. Ab al-Zand b. Ab al-Qurd b. Qays b. Qahd.
21.
Ibrhim b. Tamm b. Qays b. Qahd.
22.
'Abd al-Rahmn b. Sa'd.
23.
'Abd al-Rahmn b. Mu'dh.
24.
Khlid b. Safwn.
25.
Zayd b. Ab 'Amr b. Muhsin.
26.
Yahy b. 'Amr.
27.
Muhammad b. Abyy b. Ka'b.
28.
''idh b. Ab Qays b. Anas b. Qays.
29.
Anas b. Muhammad b. 'Abd Allh b. Ab Talha.
30.
'Amr b. 'Amr.
31.
Ism'l b. 'Abd al-Rahmn b. Hassn b. Thbit.
32.
Muhammad b. 'Abd al-Malik b. Nubayt.
33.
'mir b. 'Uqba.
34.
'Amra b. 'Amr b. Hazm.
35.
Qays b. Ab al-Wird b. Qahd.
Mu'dh b. al-Samma.
Ayyb b. 'Abd Allh b. Mu'dh.
'Amr b. Khashram.
'Abd al-Rahmn b. Ab Qatda b. Rib'.
Yazd b. Ab al-Yasr.
Yahy b. Saif b. Aswad b. Wahab b. Ka'b b. Mlik.
Muhammad b. 'Abd al-Rahmn b. Ab al-Mundhar.
'Urwa b. Ab 'Ummra.
'Uthmn b. 'Urwa (his son).
'Uqba b. Ab 'Ummra. and his brother
Mas'd.
Sa'd b. 'Uthmn b. Khalda.
Salma b. Qays b. Thbit b. Khalda.
'mir b. 'Abd al-Rahmn b. 'Amr.
Matlab b. 'mir b. 'Amr b. Khalda.
Hrith b. Rif'a b. Rfi' b. Mlik.
Sulaymn b. Ab 'Aysh b. Mu'wiyah b. Smit.
Muhammad b. Ubayy
Muhammad b. Ubayy b. Ka'b b. Qays b. 'Ubayd b. Mu'wiyah b. 'Amr b. Mlik b. Najjr was
nicknamed as Ab Ma'dh. He was born in the time of the Prophet (s). His mother, Umm alTufayl, was the daughter of Tufayl b. 'Amr b. Mundhar b. Subay' b. 'Abd Nuham from Daws
tribe. He was an eminent scholar of hadth and a few traditions have also been transmitted
from him. He was killed in the battle of Harrah in 63 A.H. (682 C.E.)28172
Suwayd b. Uwaym
The mother of Suwayd b. 'Uwaym b. S'idat b. ''ish b. Qays b. Nu'mn b. Yazd b. Umayyah
Umma, was the daughter of Bukayr b. Tha'laba, a descendant of Ban Ghadab b. Jushm b.
Jazraj. He was killed on the day of Harrah in 63 A.H. (682 C.E.)29173
Ayyb b. Bashr
Ayyb b. Bashr b. Sa'd b. Nu'mn b. Akkl b. Lawdhn b. Hrith b. Umayyah b. Mu'wiyah
b. Mlik b. 'Awf b. 'Amr b. 'Awf, was from the Ansrs and from the Khazraj tribe. His
nickname was Ab Sulaymn. He was born in the time of the Prophet (s). He participated in
the battle of Harrah and received many injuries, and after two years died of the injuries at
the age of 75.30174
Muhammad b. Thbit
Muhammad b. Thbit b. Qays b. Shamms b. Mlik b. 'Amr b. Mlik al-Asghar b. Tha'laba b.
Ka'b b. Khazraj b. Hrith b. Khazraj12, 'Abd Allh b. Hanzala's maternal brother.32176
Sons of Muhammad
Muhammad had three sons named 'Abd Allh, Sulaymn, and Yahy who were killed on the
day of Harrah.33177
s b. Abd al-Rahmn
'Is b. 'Abd al-Rahmn b. Yazd b. Jriya b. 'mir b. Majma' b. 'Atf b. Dab'at b. Zayd b.
Mlik b. 'Awf b. 'Amr b. 'Awf from the Aws tribe was killed on the day of Harrah.34178
Aflah
Aflah, Ab Ayyb Ansr's slave, was nicknamed as Ab Kathr and according to some Ab
Abd al-Rahmn. He was a captive of 'Ayn al-Tamr35 that was conquered by Khlid b. Wald
in the time of Ab Bakr's Calliphate. He was a trustworthy man who was killed on the day of
Harrah.36180
Amr b. Sad
'Amr b. Sa'd b. Ab Waqqs b. Uhayb b. 'Abd Manf b. Zuhra's mother was Sulam, daughter
of Hasfa b. Thaqaf b. Rab'a b. Taym al-Lt b. Tha'laba b. 'Ukba from Rab'a tribe, who was
killed on the day of Harrah in Dhu'l Hijja, in 63 A.H.37181
Umayr b. Sad
'Umayr b. Sa'd and 'Amr b. Sa'd's brother were of the same mother. These two brothers
were killed on the day of Harrah.38182
Ibrhm b. Nuaym
Ibrhm b. Nu'aym b. Nahm b. 'Abd Allh b. Asd b. 'Abd 'Awf b. 'Ubayd b. 'Uwayj 'Adyy b.
Ka'b was one of the commanders on the day of Harrah and was killed on the same
day.39183
Muhammad b. Ab al-Jahm
Muhammad b. Na'm b. Ab al-Jahm b. Ghnim b. 'mir b. 'Abd Allh b. 'Ubayd b. 'Uwayj b.
'Ad b. Ka'b's mother, Khawla, was Qa'q' b. Ma'bad's daughter from Ban Tamm tribe. He
was one of the commanders on the day of Harrah and was killed on the same day.40
Hrith b. Mzin b. Mansr b. 'Ikrama b. Hasafa b. 'Ayln b. Mudar, was killed on the day of
Harrah.43187
Umra b. Suhayb
'Umra b. Suhab b. Sann b. Mlik, was killed on the day of Harrah.49
Abbd b. Ab Nila
'Abbd b. Ab N'ila, Silkn b. Salma b. Waqsh b. Zughba b. Zaghwar' b. 'Abd al-Ashhal
and his son Salama, were killed on the day of Harrah.49 'Abbd's mother, Sahl, Raw Waqsh
daughter was from Ban Ashhal.
Zayd b. Muhammad
Zayd b. Muhammad b. Maslama b. Khlid b. Adyy b. Mujda'a b. Hrith b. Khazraj b. 'Amr
was from the Aws tribe and his mother was a slave girl. He was killed as martyr on the day
of Harrah after having 14 sword wounds with four of the wounds on his face.46190
Jafar b. Yazd
Ja'far b. Yazd b. Silkn b. Salma b. Waqsh was killed on the day of Harrah.47191
Thbit's Children
'Amr and Muhammad and Yazd b. Qays b. Khatm b. Adyy b. Zufr and Ka'b b. Khazraj b.
'Amr who were from the Aws tribe. Their mother, Umm Habb, was the daughter of Qays b.
Zayd b. 'mir b. Sawd b. Zufr and all were killed on the day of Harrah in 63 A.H.48192
Khawwt's Children
Habb b. Khawwt b. Jubayr b. Nu'mn b. Umayyah b. Amr al-Qays was killed on the day of
Harrah. His mother was from the Fuqaym Ban Tha'laba tribe. His brother 'Amr b. Khawwt
was also killed on the day of Harrah. His mother's name is not historically specified.
Children of Mujammi
Yahy b. Jriya b. 'mir b. Mujammi' b. 'Attf b. Dubay'a b. Zayd b. Mlik b. 'Awf b. 'Amr b.
'Awf, from the Aws tribe was killed on the day of Harrah. His mother, Sulam, was the
daughter of Thbit b. Dahdha from the Balayy Qud'a. 'Ubayd Allh b. Mujamma', Yahy's
maternal brother, was also killed in the battle of Harrah.49193
Muhammad b. Jabr
Muhammad b. Jabr b. 'Atk b. Qays b. Haysha b. Hrith b. Umayyah b. Mu'wiyyah b. Mlik
b. 'Awf b. 'Amr b. 'Awf from the Aws tribe was killed on the day of Harrah.50194194
Abbd b. sim
'Abbd b. 'sim b. 'Ad b. Jadd b. 'Ajln was from one of Qud'a tribes and was killed on the
day of Harrah. They were from among the allies Ban 'Amr b 'Awf from Aws tribe.51
Children of Zayd
Seven of Zayd's children were killed in the battle of Harrah:
Sa'd b. Zayd b. Thbit b. Dahhk b. Zayd b. Lawdhn b. 'Amr b. 'Abd b. 'Awf b. Mlik b.
Najjr. His mother, Umm Sa'd, was the daughter of Sa'd b. Rab', from the Bulhrith b.
Khazraj tribe. Sa'd was killed on the day of Harrah. His brother Sulaymn b. Zayd was also
killed on the day of Harrah. His other brother, Yahy b. Zayd was also killed then. These
brothers were all from the same brother. Salt b. Zayd, 'Abd al-Rahmn b. Zayd and 'Abd
Allah b. Zayd, whose mother was a slave girl, and also Zayd b. Zayd were killed on the day
of Harrah.51195
Umrah b. Aqaba
'Umrah b. 'Uqba b. Kudaym b. 'Adyy b. Hritha b. 'Amr b. Zayd Mant b. 'Adyy b. 'Amr b.
Mlik b. Najjr, whose mother was a slave girl, was killed on the day of Harrah.52196
Sons of Nubayt
Muhammad b. Nubayt b. Jbir b. Mlik b. 'Ad b. Zayd b. Mant b. 'Ad b. 'Amr b. Mlik b.
Najjr and his brother, 'Abd al-Malik b. Nubayt, were killed on the day of Harrah.53
Muhammad b. Nubayt's mother, Furay'a, daughter of Ab Amma, As'ad b. Zarra was from
Ban Najjr.
mother, Sulfa, was daughter of Bar' b. Ma'rr from Ban Salma tribe.
Yazd b. Ab al-Yasar
Yazd b. Ab al-Yasar (Ka'b b. 'Amr b. 'Abbd b. 'Amr b. Sawd) from Ban Salma was from
Khazraj tribe. He was killed on the day of Harrah.56
Children of Ab Ayysh
Sulaymn b. Ab 'Ayysh b. 'Ubayd b. Mu'wiyah b. Smit, whose mother was a slave girl,
was killed on the day of Harrah. His brother, Bashr b. Ab 'Ayysh was also killed and no
one of their generation survived.57201201
Childen of Ab Ubda
From among his children, three were killed on the day of Harrah:
Qurwa b. Ab 'Ubda b. Sa'd b. 'Uthmn b. Khalda b. Mukhallad b. 'mir b. Wurayq. His
mother, Umm Khlid, was 'Amr b. Wadhfa from the Khazraj tribe.
'Uthmn, Farwah's son was also killed in the battle of Harrah. Sa'd b. 'Uthmn was from
among the fighters of Badr.
'Uqba b. Ab 'Ubda b. Sa'd b. 'Uthmn, whose mother was a slave girl, was also killed on
the day of Harrah.52
Mas'd b. 'Ubda
Mas'd b. 'Ubda b. Ab 'Ubda, Sa'd b. 'Uthmn b. Khalda, whose mother was a slave girl,
was killed on the day of Harrah.58202
Children of Ka'b
Ishq b. Ka'b b. 'Ujra b. Umayyah b. 'Ad b. Hrith was killed on the day of Harrah. His
brother, Muhammad b. Ka'b, was also killed on the day of Harrah.59
Dhakwn
Ab 'Amr, was a slave of ''isha - Prophet's (s) wife - who was freed after the demise of
''isha. He was killed on the day of Harrah.60204
Kathr b. Aflah
Kathr b. Aflah was Ab Ayyb Ansr's slave who was killed on the day of Harrah.61 He was
one of the scribes when 'Uthmn had new copies of the Qur'an written.62206
Bashr b. Ab Zayd
Bashr b. Ab Zayd was killed on the day of Harrah. His descendents lived in Basra.63207
Yazd b. Hurmuz
Yazd b. Hurmuz Frs - Mawl al-Dawsyn - was the commander of the slaves on the day of
Harrah. He was a trustworthy person who was killed on the day of Harrah.64208
Ibrhm b. Qriz
Ibrhm b. Qriz - Khlid b. Hrith b. 'Ubayd b. Tayim b. 'Amr b. Hrith b. Mabdhl b. Hrith
b. 'Abd Mant b. Kunna was killed on the day of Harrah.66210
***
Mus'ab b. Zubayr lists the name of those killed in the battle of Harrah as follows:
Fadl Asghar
He was a pious man who was killed on the day of Harrah.67211
Muhammad b. Ayyb
Muhammad b. Ayyb b. 'Abd al-Mundhar b. 'Alqama b. Kalada was killed on the day of
Harrah.68 His mother, Hind, was the daughter of Juwayd b. Huwayrith b. Hujayr b. 'Abd b.
Qusayy.
Yazd b. Musfi
Yazd b. Musfi' b. Talha b. 'Uthmn, whose mother was of the Ban Hrith b. Khazraj tribe,
Muslim b. Ab Burda
Muslim b. Ab Burda b. Ma'bad, had a son named Muslim whose mother was Hafsa,
daughter of Ab Harmala, from the Ash'arites, and was killed on the day of Harrah.74218
Sons of sim
'Ubayd Allh and Sulaymn: sons of 'sim b. 'Amr b. al-Khattb, whose mother ''isha, was
Mut' b. Aswad's daughter, was killed on the day of Harrah.75219
Zayd b. Thbit
Zayd b. Thbit b. Dahhk who was from among the Ansr and nicknamed as Ab Sa'd
(some reported as Ab Abd al-Rahmn) was killed in the battle of Harrah.78222
Yaqb b. Talha
Ya'qb b. Talha b. 'Ubayd Allh b. 'Uthmn b. Ka'b b. Sa'd b. Tayim b. Murra b. Ka'b b.
Lu'ayy b. Ghlib b. Fahr b. Mlik b. Nadr b. Kunna was killed on the day of Harrah.79223
Mudh b. Hrith
Mu'dh b. Hrith b. Arqam b. 'Awf b. Wahb b. 'Amr b. 'Abd 'Awf b. Ghanam b. Mlik b. Najjr
Ansr Khazraj has been nicknamed as Ab Halma and is famous with the same. However,
he was called Qr. He was six years old at the time of the Prophet's (s) demise. He
participated in the battle of Khandaq, and was killed on the day of Harrah.82 Some have
also reported his name to be M'dh b. Harith.83227
Asd b. Rfi
Asd b. Rfi' b. Karz b. Sakan b. Za'r b. 'Abd al-Ashhal, was killed on the day of
Harrah.85229
Suwayd b. Awm
Suwayd b. 'Awm b. S'ida b. ''is b. Nu'mn b. Zayd b. Umayyah was killed on the day of
Harrah.86230
Habb b. Khawt
Habb b. Khawt was killed on the day of Harrah.87231
17.
9. Zubayr, Musab, Nasab-i Quraysh, p. 88; Masd, Murj al-Dhahab, vol. 3, p. 70;
Nuwayr, Nahyat al-Irab, vol. 6, p. 227; Ibn Khaldn, Tarkh, vol. 2, p. 37; Zirkl, Al-Alm,
vol. 5, p. 355, has also mentioned them.
10. Ibn Qutayba wrote: The one who was killed in Ibn Zubayr sedition was Musab b. Abd
al-Rahmn (Marif, p. 238).
11. The correct recording is Sakhr b. Kab (Zubayr, Musab, Nasab-i Quraysh).
12. The correct recording is Nilat b. Harim b. Rawha (Ibn Khayyt, Tarkh-i Khalfah bin
al-Khayyt, vol. 1, p. 299).
13. Or, Ziyd b. Ab Umayma. However, Zubayr in his book, Nasab-i Quraysh, p. 446, has
not mentioned his name.
14. The correct recording is Shaybn b. Muhrib (Zubayr, Musab, Nasab-i Quraysh, p.
447).
15. There will be a detailed discussion about Abd Allh b. Hanzala in the following pages.
16. The correct recording is Akshat b. Yazd b. Abd al-Rahmn b. Yazd.
17. The correct recording is Dhakwn b. Mawl b. Hanzala
18. The correct recording is Yazd b. Muhammad b Muslima (Ibn Hajar Asqaln, Al-Isba,
translation p. 7808).
19. Ibn Khayyt, Tarkh-i Khalfah ibn al-Khayyt, p. 293-314.
20. Ibn Sad, Tabaqt, vol. 5, p. 46.
21. Tbi (successor) is a person who had met and accepted the companions of the
Prophet (s), and died as a Muslim (Al-Munjad, under the entry taba).
22. Zirkl, Al-Alm, vol. 4, p. 233.
23. The Prophet (s) said on the day of Battle of Uhud: I saw the angels in between the
earth and the heaven with golden vessels filled with water from the well belonging to
Muzan tribe, were giving him ghusl. Thus, he was known as Ghasl al-Malika (Qumm,
Safnat al-Bihr, vol. 2, p. 317).
24. Ibn Taghr Bird, al-Nujum al-Zhira, vol. 1, p. 161.
25. Ibid, vol. 5, p. 49; Ibn Qutayba, Al-Imma wa al-Siysa, vol. 2, p. 10; Yfi, Mirt alJinn, vol. 1, p. 137.
26. Najrn is a Yemani village in the region of Mecca (Yqt Hamaw, Mujam al-Buldn,
vol. 5, p. 266).
27. Nawaw, Tahdhb al-Asmwa al-Lught, part one, p. 88.
28. Ibn Sad, Tabaqt, vol. 5, p. 55.
29. Ibid, vol. 5, p. 56.
30. Ibid, vol. 5, p. 57.
31. Ibid, vol. 5, p. 57 and vol. 8, p. 383.
32. Ibn Athr, al-Kmil, vol. 4, p. 117.
33. Ibn Sad, Tabaqt, vol. 5, p. 59.
34. Ibn Sad, Tabaqt, vol. 5, p. 60.
35. Ayn al-Tamr was a hamlet near Anbr on the west of Kfa. The Muslims under Khlid
b. Wald conqured it in 12 A.H. (Yqt Hamaw, Mujam al-Buldn, vol. 4, p. 176).
36. Ibn Sad, Tabaqt, vol. 5, p. 62.
37. Ibid, vol. 5, p. 125.
38. Ibid, vol. 5, p. 126.
39. Ibid, vol. 5, p. 127; Ibn Abd al-Birr Numar, Al-Istb, vol. 1, p. 55.
40. Ibn Sad, Tabaqt, vol. 5, p. 128
41. Ibid, vol. 5, p. 128.
42. Ibid, vol. 5, p. 128.
43. Ibid, vol. 5, p. 132.
44. Ibid, vol. 5, p. 144.
army;11 thus, he gave up his order and let 'Al b. 'Abd Allh simply state that: I swear
allegiance to Yazd and am obliged to obey him.12
killing the hypocrites and wrong-doers whose the Medinans' rebellion had lasted too long.
I am writing this letter to Amr from the house of Sa'd b. 's while I am severely sick. For
this sickness you may not see me any longer. I did not have any other wish than revenge
from the people of Medina! Wassalm!13254
Some others have reported that in the end of his letter, Muslim had written to Yazd as
follows:
Do not be saddened for the faithless people!14255
honor than that of all the religious and Divine values, and any human and religious principle
can be easily trampled for the sake of the preservation of the ruler's authority and power!
In his death-bed and after creating all these tragedies, Muslim b. 'Uqba says:
O Lord! You know that I never disobeyed the Caliph. O God! After professing Your Oneness
and the Prophethood of Muhammad (s), I have done no better and more praiseworthy task
than the massacre of the people of Medina, and I take this massacre as a means of my
salvation on the Day of Resurrection.19260
A man, whom the historians have regarded as among the devotees of Mu'wiyan cult20
and one of the tyrants of Arabs and their devils21, and who because of his countless
murders and massacres has been called Musrif b. 'Uqba, now tries to impute all his evils to
religion and serving the Muslims!
Thus he died and was buried at a distance of three miles from Medina. However, those
whose children and relatives were killed by his order exhumed his body from the grave and
burned it.22263
17. Ibn Qutayba, Al-Imma wa al-Siysa, vol. 1, p. 219 and vol. 2, p. 12; Ibn Athr, Al-Kmil
f al-Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 123.
18. Ibid.
19. Ibn Atham, Al-Futh, vol. 5, p. 185; Ibn Athr, Al-Kmil f al-Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 123;
Samhd, Waf al-Waf, vol. 1, p. 136.
20. Ibn Hajar Asqaln, Al-Isba, vol. 3, p. 493.
21. Masd, Murj al-Dhahab, vol. 3, p. 70; Zubayr, Musab, Nasab-i Quraysh, p. 127;
Tabar, Tarkh, vol. 7, p. 14; Madqis, Al-Bad wa al-Tarkh, vol. 6, p. 14; Ibn Athr, Al-Kmil
f al-Tarkh, vol. 4, p. 120.
22. Zubayr, Musab, Nasab-i Quraysh, p. 222; Ibn Qutayba, Al-Imma wa al-Siysa, vol. 1,
p. 219; Samhd, Waf al-Waf, vol. 1, p. 135.
Bibliography
Ab al-Faraj al-Isfahn, 'Al (d. 356 A.H.), Al-Aghn, Beirut, Dr Ihy' al-Turth al-'Arab,
1383 A.H.
Ab al-Fid, Ism'l (d. 732 A.H.), Al-Mukhtasar f Akhbr al-Bashar, Beirut, Dr al-Ma'rifa,
1998 C.E.
Ab al-Fid, Ism'l (d. 732 A.H.), Taqwm al-Buldn, Paris, Dr al-Tab'at al-Sultniya, 1840
C.E.
Ab Mikhnaf, Hishm (d. 517 A.H.), Maqtal al-Husayn, Qom, Intishrt al-Rad, 1466 A.H.
Ab Nu'aym, Ahmad (d. 430 A.H.), Hilyat al-Awliy', Beirut, Dr al-Kutub al-'Arab, 1407 A.H.
Amr 'Al (d. 1928 C.E.), A Short History of Saracens (Arabic translation: Mukhtasar Ta'rkh
al-'Arab) 1406 A.H.
Azraq, Muhammad (d. 250 A.H.), Akhbr Makkah al-Musharrafa, Cairo, Al-Madrasah alMahrsa, 1275 A.H.
Bbit, Fu'd, Mu'jam al-Shu'ar', Tripoli, Dr al-Sdir, 1998 C.E.
Baghdd, 'Abd al-Mu'min b. 'Abd al-Haqq (d. 739 A.H.), Marsid al-Ittil', Beirut, Dr alMa'rifa, 1954 C.E.
Baghdd, 'Abd al-Qdir (d. 393 A.H.), Khaznat al-Adab wa Lubb Lubb Lisn al-'Arab,
Cairo, Dr al-Kitb al-'Arab, 1389 A.H.
Bal'am, Muhammad (d. 363 A.H.), Trkh Nma-yi Bal'am, Tehran, Nashr-i Now, 1366
S.H.2591267
Bayhaq, Ahmad (d. 458 A.H.), Al-Mahsin wa al-Masw, Beirut, Dr Gdir, 1970 C.E.
Brn, Ab Rayhn Muhammad (d. 440 A.H.), Al-thr al-Bqiya 'an al-Qurn al-Khliya.
Dhahab, Muhammad (d. 748 A.H.), Syar A'lm al-Nubal', Beirut, Al-Risla, 1402 A.H.
Dhahab, Muhammad (d. 748 A.H.), Ta'rkh al-Islm, ed. 'Umar 'Abd al-Salm Tadmur,
Beirut, Dr al-Kitb al-'Arab, 1410 A.H.
Dnawar, Ab Hanfa Ahmad b. Dwud, (d. 282 A.H.), al-Akhbr al-Tiwl, ed. 'Abd al-Mun'im
'mir, Cairo, Dr Ihy al-Kutub al-'Arabiyya, 1960 C.E.
Fkhr, Hann, Ta'rkh al-Adab al-'Arab, Cairo, Dr al-Mu'rif, 1975 C.E.
Fard Wajd (d. 1954 C.E.), D'irat al-Ma'rif al-Qarn al-'Ishrn, Beirut, Dr al-Ma'rifa, 1971
C.E.
Hadram, Muhammad b. 'Aql, Mu'wiya wa Ta'rkh, (Persian translation by 'Azzullh
'Atrud), Tehran, Murtadaw Publications, 1364 S.H.
Hamaw, Yqt, (d. 626 A.H.), Mu'jam al-Buldn, Beirut, Dr al-Sdir, 1955 C.E.
Ibn 'Abd al-Birr Numar (d. 463 A.H.), Al-Ist'b f Ma'rifat al-Ashb, added as margin to AlIsba of Ibn Hajar.
Ibn 'Abd Rabbih, Ahmad (d. 328 A.H.), al-'Iqd al-Fard, ed. 'Abd al-Majd al-Tarhn, Beirut,
Dr al-Kutub al-'Ilmiya, 1404 A.H.
Ibn Ab al-Hadd, 'Izz al-Dn (d. 748 A.H.), Sharh Nahj al-Balgha, ed. Ab al-Fadl Ibrhm,
Cairo, Dr Ihy' al-Turth al-'Arab, 1379 A.H.
Ibn Ab Usyaybi'a (d. 668 A.H.), 'Uyn al-Anb' f Tabaqt al-Atibba', ed. Muhammad Bsil,
Beirut, Dr al-Kutub al-'Ilmiya, 1419 A.H.
Ibn 'Askir, Muhammad (d. 711 A.H.), Ta'rkh Dimashq, Beirut, Dr al-Fikr, 1404 A.H.
Ibn A'tham Kf, Ahmad (d. 314 AH), Al-Futh, Beirut, Dr al-Kutub al-'Ilmiya, 1st impr. 1406
AH.
Ibn Athr, 'Al (d. 630 A.H.), Al-Kmil f al-Ta'rkh, Beirut, Dr al-Sdir, 1358 A.H.
Ibn Athr, 'Al (d. 630 A.H.), Usd al-Ghba f Ma'rifat al-Sahba, Cairo, Dr Sha'b, 1390 A.H.
Ibn Athr, Mubrak (d. 606 A.H.), Jmi' al-Usl min Ahdth al-Rasl, Beirut, Dr Ihy' alTurth al-'Arab, 1404 A.H.
Ibn Athr, Mubrak (d. 606 A.H.), Al-Nihya f Gharb al-Hadth wa al-Athar, Qom, Ism'liyn,
1364 S.H.
Ibn Bakkr, Mus'ab (d. 236 A.H.), Nasab Quraysh, Beirut, Dr al-Ma'rifa, 1953 C.E.
Ibn Battta, Muhammad (d. 703 A.H.), Al-Rihla, Beirut, Dr al-Kutub al-'Ilmiya, 1407 A.H.
Ibn Hajar Asqaln, Ahmad (d. 852 A.H.), Al-Isba f Tamyz al-Sahba, Beirut, Dr Ihy' alTurth al-'Arab, 1328 A.H.
Ibn Hajar Asqaln, Ahmad (d. 852 A.H.), Tahdhb al-Tahdhb, Beirut, Dr al-Kutub al-'Ilmiya,
1415 A.H.
Ibn Hajar Haytam, Ahmad (d. 974 A.H.), al-Saw'iq al-Muhriqa, Cairo, Maktabat al-Qhira,
1385 A.H.
Ibn Hanbal, Ahmad (d. 241 A.H.), Al-Musnad, Beirut, Dr al-Fikr, 1412 A.H.
Ibn Hazm, Ahmad (d. 456 A.H.), Jamharat Ansb al-'Arab, Beirut, Dr al-Kutub al-'Ilmiya,
1403 A.H.
Ibn Hishm, 'Abd al-Malik (d. 218 or 213 A.H.), Al-Srat al-Nabawiyya, Beirut, Dr Ihy' alTurth al-'Arab, 1969 C.E.
Ibn 'Imd, 'Abd al-Hayy b. Ahmad (d. 1089 A.H.), Shadhart al-Dhahab f Akhbr man
Dhahab, Beirut, Dr Ihy' al-Turth al-'Arab, 1994 C.E.
Ibn Jawz, 'Abd al-Rahmn (d. 597 A.H.), Sifat al-Safwa, Beirut, Dr al-Ma'rifa, 1404 A.H.
Ibn Jawz, Sibt (d. 654 A.H.), Tadhkirat al-Khaws, Beirut, Mu'assisa Ahl al-Bayt, 1401 A.H.
Ibn Kathr, Ism'l (d. 774 A.H.), Al-Bidya wa al-Nihya, Beirut, Maktabat al-Ma'rif.
Ibn Khaldn, 'Abd al-Rahmn (d. 808 A.H.), Muqaddima, (translated to Persian by M. Parvn
Gunbd), Tehran, Intishrt-e-'Ilm Farhang, 1362 S.H.
Ibn Khaldn, 'Abd al-Rahmn (d. 808 A.H.), Ta'rkh-i Ibn Khaldn, al-'Ibar wa Dvn alMubtad wa al-Khabar, trans. 'Abd al-Muhammad yat, Tehran, Mu'assisa Mutli't wa
Tahqqt-i Farhang, 1364 S.H.
Ibn Khallikn, Ahmad (d. 681 A.H.), Wafayt al-A'yn wa Anb' al-Zamn, ed. Ihsn 'Abbs,
Qom, Intishrt al-Rad, 1364 S.H.
Ibn Khayyt, Khalfa (d. 240 A.H.), Ta'rkh Khalfa ibn al-Khayyt, ed. Suhayl Zakkra, Beirut,
Dr al-Fikr, 1414 A.H.
Ibn Khurddhbih, 'Ubayd Allh (d. ca. 300 A.H.), Al-Maslik wa al-Mamlik, Beirut, Dr Ihy'
al-Turth al-'Arab, 1408 A.H.
Ibn Manzr, Muhammad (d. 711 A.H.), Lisn al-'Arab, Beirut, Dr Ihy' al-Turth al-'Arab,
1412, A.H.
Ibn Qutayba, 'Abd Allh Dnawar (d. 276 A.H.), 'Uyn al-Akhbr, Beirut, Dr al-Kutub al'Arab, 1416 A.H.
Ibn Qutayba, 'Abd Allh Dnawar (d. 276 A.H.), Al-Imma wa al-Siysa, Cairo, Maktabat alHalab, 1388 A.H.
Ibn Qutayba, 'Abd Allh Dnawar (d. 276 A.H.), Al-Ma'rif, Cairo, Dr al-Ma'rifa, 1388 A.H.
Ibn Qutayba, 'Abd Allh Dnawar (d. 276 A.H.), Al-Shi'r wa al-Shu'ar, Beirut, 'lam al-Kitb,
1404 A.H.
Ibn Rusta, Ahmad (d. 3rd century A.H.), Al-A'lq al-Nafsa, (Persian translation) Husayn
Qarachnl, Tehran, Amr Kabr, 1365 S.H.
Ibn Sa'd, Muhammad (d. 230 A.H.), al-Tabaqt al-Kubr, ed. Muhammad 'Abd al-Qdir 'At,
Beirut, Dr al-Sdir, 1418 A.H.
Ibn Shahrshb, Muhammad (d. 588 A.H.), Manqib l Ab Tlib, Qom, Matba' al-'Ilmiyya,
1412 A.H.
Ibn Tiqtaq, Muhammad (d. 709 A.H.), Al-Fakhr f al-db al-Sultniya wa al-Duwal alIslmiya, Beirut, Dr al-Sadir, 1414 A.H.
Ibn Taghri Bird, Ysuf (d. 874 A.H.), Al-Nujm al-Zhira f Mulk Misr wa al-Qhira, Cairo,
Wizra al-Thiqfa wa al-Irshd al-Qawm, 1929 C.E.
Ibn Tws, 'Al (d. 664 A.H.), Al-Luhf f Qatli al-Tuff, Najaf, Haydariya, 1385 A.H.
Ibn Ward, 'Umar (d. 749 A.H.), Tatimmat al-Mukhtasar (Ta'rkh Ibn al-Ward), Najaf,
Haydariyya, 1389 A.H.
'Imrn, Muhammad (d. 1184 C.E.), Al-Anb' f Ta'rkh al-Khulaf, ed. Taq Bnish, Mashhad,
Dnishgh, 1363 S.H.
Istakhr, Ibrhm (d. after 340 A.H.), Maslik al-Mamlik, Qom, Sadr Library Publication,
1368 S.H.
Jhiz, 'Amr (d. 255 A.H.), Al-Tj f Akhlq al-Mulk, Beirut, al-Sharikah al-Lubnaniyah lilKitab, 1970 C.E.
Khatb Baghdd, Ahmad (d. 463 A.H.), Ta'rkh Baghdad (or, Medinat al-Salm), ed. Mustaf
'Abd al-Qdir 'At', Ahmad, Beirut, Dr al-Kutub al-'Ilmiya, 1417 A.H.
Khwrizm, Muwwafaq (d. 568 A.H.), Maqtal al-Husayn, ed. Muhammad Samw, Qom,
Anwr al-Hud, 1418 A.H.
Khwnd Mr, Ghiyth al-Dn (d. 942 A.H.), Habb al-Siyar, Tehran, Khayym, 1353 S.H.
Majlis, Muhammad Bqir (d. 1111 A.H.), Bihr al-Anwr, Beirut, Mu'assisa al-Waf', 1403
A.H.
Maqdis, Mutahhar (d. 355 A.H.), Al-Bad' wa al-Ta'rkh, Baghdad, Muthann, 1899 C.E.
Mas'd, 'Al (d. 346 A.H.), Murj al-Dhahab, Qom, Dr al-Hijra, 1404 A.H.
Mas'd, 'Al (d. 346 A.H.), Al-Tanbh wa al-Ishrf, Cairo, Dr al-Sw, 1938 C.E.
Miskawayh al-Rz, Ab 'Al (d. 421 A.H.), Tajrib al-Umam, ed. Ab al-Qsim Imm, Tehran,
Dar-e Sursh, 1366 S.H.
Mubarrad, Muhammad (d. 286 A.H.), Kmil, Cairo, Matba'at al-'mira, 1286 A.H.
Mufd, Muhammad (d. 413 A.H.), Al-Irshd, Beirut, Mu'assasat al-'lami, 1399 A.H.
Muqarram, 'Abd al-Razzq (d. 1391 A.H.), Maqtal al-Husayn, Beirut, Mu'assasat al-Nr li alMatb't, 1423 A.H.
Nawaw, Yahy (d. 676 A.H.), Tahdhb al-Asm' wa al-Lught, Cairo, Idara al-Tiba`a-Munriyya, 1927 C.E.
Nuwayr, Ahmad (d. 6th century A.H.), Nahyat al-Irab f Funn al-Adab, (Persian
translation) Dmqn, Tehran, Amr Kabr, 1363 S.H.
Philip Hitti (d. 1978 C.E.), Ta'rkh al-'Arab (Persian translation by Ab al-Ghsim Pyandeh)
Tehran, Intishrt-e-Sn, 1351 S.H.
Philip Hitti (d. 1978 C.E.), Ta'rkh al-Duwal al-Islmiyya, Cairo, Drul-Ma'rif, 1389 A.H.
Quraysh Baqir Sharf, Hayt al-Imm Ms b. Ja'far ('a), Najaf, Matba'at al-db, 1389 A.H.
Qazwn, 'Abd al-Karm (d. 623 A.H.), Al-Misbh al-Munr, Beirut, Maktabat al-Lubnn, 1987
C.E.
Qumm, 'Abbs (d. 1359 A.H.), Safna al-Bihr, Qom, Drul Uswa, 1416 A.H.
Qumm, 'Abbs (d. 1359 A.H.), Tatimma al-Muntah, Qom, Dwar Publication, 1409 A.H.
Safwat, Zak Ahmad, Jamharat Ras'il al-'Arab f 'Usr al-'Arabiyyat al-Zhira, Beirut, AlMaktaba al-'Ilmiyya, 1985 C.E.
Samhd, 'Al (d. 911 A.H.), Waf al-Waf' bi Akhbr Dr al-Mustaf, ed. Muhammad Muhy
al-Dn 'Abd al-Hamd, Beirut, Dr al-Ihy' al-Turth al-'Arab, 1374, A.H.
Sayyid Qutb (d. 1966 C.E.), F Zall al-Qur'n, Beirut, Dr al-Shurq, 1402 A.H.
Shabrw, 'Abd Allh, (d. 1172 A.H.), Al-Ittahf bi Hubb al-Ashrf, Qom, Manshrt al-Rd,
1363 S.H.
Shawq Dayf (d. 1932 C.E.), Ta'rkh al-Adab al-'Arab, Cairo, Dr al-Ma'rf, 1975 C.E.
Suyut, Jall al-Dn (d. 911 A.H.), Ta'rkh al-Khulaf, Qom, Intishrt al-Rad, 1411 A.H.
Suwayd, Muhammad Amn (d. 1246 A.H.), Sub'ik al-Dhahab, Beirut, Dr al-Kutub al'Ilmiya, 1409 A.H.
Tabar, Muhammad (d. 310 A.H.), Ta'rkh al-Umam wa al-Mulk (Ta'rkh-i Tabar), ed. A
Group of Scholars, Cairo, 1358 A.H.
Turayh, Fakhr al-Dn (d. 1058 A.H.), Majma' al-Bahrayn, Tehran, Daftar-i Nashr-i Farhang-i
Islm, 1408 A.H.
Ts, Muhammad ibn al-Hasan (d. 460 A.H.), Al-Aml, Najaf, Matba'a al-Nu'mn, 1386 A.H.
Ya'qb, Ahmad (d. 292 A.H.), Ta'rkh al-Ya'qb, Beirut, Dr al-Sdir, 1995 C.E.
Yafi', Abd Allh (d. 768 A.H.), Mir't al-Jinn, Beirut, Mu'assisa al-A'lam li al-Matb't, 1390
A.H.
Zirkil, Khayr al-Dn, Al-A'lm, Beirut, Dr al-Mal'yn, 1998 C.E.
Zubayd, Muhammad (d. 379 A.H.), Tj al-'Ars, Cairo, Khayriya, 1360 A.H.
Zubayr, Mus'ab (d. 236 A.H.), Nasab-i Quraysh, ed. Lvie Provenal, Beirut, Dr al-Ma'rif,
1953 C.E.
1. S.H. = Solar Hijrah Calender