Andrés Bonifacio
Andrés Bonifacio
Andrés Bonifacio
This name uses Spanish naming customs: the first or paternal family name is Bonifacio and the second or maternal
family name is de Castro.
This article is about the person Andrs Bonifacio. For the Philippine Navy ship, see BRP Andres Bonifacio (PF-7).
For other uses, see Bonifacio.
In office
24 August 1896 22 March or 10 May 1897
Vice President
Emilio Jacinto
(Unofficial)
Preceded by
Post Established
Succeeded by
Personal details
Born
Died
Resting place
Remains lost
Nationality
Filipino
Political party
La Liga Filipina
Katipunan
Spouse(s)
Children
Education
Self-educated
Profession
Religion
Roman Catholicism
Signature
Andrs Bonifacio y de Castro (30 November 1863 10 May 1897) was a Filipino nationalist and revolutionary. He
is often called "the father of the Philippine Revolution". He was a founder and later Supremo ("supreme leader") of
the Kataas-taasan, Kagalang-galangang Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan or simply and more popularly
called Katipunan, a movement which sought the independence of the Philippines from Spanish colonial rule and
started the Philippine Revolution.[1][2] He is considered a de factonational hero of the Philippines,[3] and is also
considered by some Filipino historians to be the first President of the Philippines (through the revolutionary
government he established), but officially he is not recognized as such.[4][5]
Contents
[hide]
1 Family background
2 Education and early life
3 Marriages
4 Early political activism
5 Katipunan
6 Philippine Revolution
o 6.1 Start of the uprising
o 6.2 Campaigns around Manila
o 6.3 Bonifacio in Cavite
o 6.4 The Tejeros Convention
7 Capture, trial and death
8 Historical controversies
o 8.1 Trial and execution
o 8.2 Bonifacio as first Philippine President
o 8.3 Bonifacio as national hero
o 8.4 Bonifacio's bones
9 See also
10 Notes
11 References
12 External links
Family background[edit]
This section includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but the sources of this
section remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please improve this article by
introducing more precise citations. (October 2013)
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this
article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and
removed. (October 2013)
Bonifacio was born in Tondo, Manila, the son of Santiago Bonifacio, a native of Taguig, and Catalina de Castro, a
native of Cabangan, Zambales. He was the eldest of six children. His siblings were Ciriaco, Procopio,
Troadio, Esperidiona and Maxima. His father was a tailor who served in the colonial government as a teniente
mayor of Tondo, Manila, while his mother was a supervisor at a cigarette factory in Manila and was a mestiza born
of a Spanish father and a Filipino-Chinese mother. As was custom, upon baptism he was named for the saint on
whose feast he was born, Andrew the Apostle.
In his late teens, he worked as a mandatorio for the British trading firm Fleming and Company, where he rose to
become a corregidor of tar, rattan and other goods. He later transferred to Fressell and Company, a German trading
firm, where he worked as a bodeguero(storehouse keeper) where he is responsible for warehouse inventory.
Bonifacio also founded a theater company with his friends,Macario Sakay and Aurelio Tolentino, where he was also
a part-time actor performing in moro-moro plays.
Not finishing his normal education, Bonifacio enriched his natural intelligence with self-education. He read books
about the French Revolution, biographies of the Presidents of the United States, books about contemporary
Philippine penal and civil codes, and novels such as Victor Hugo's Les Misrables, Eugne Sue's Le Juif
errant and Jos Rizal's Noli Me Tngere and El Filibusterismo. Aside from Tagalog and Spanish, he could speak
and understand English, which he learned while working at J.M. Fleming and Co.
Marriages[edit]
Bonifacio was married twice: first to a certain Monica of Palomar. She was Bonifacio's neighbor in Tondo. Monica
died of leprosy and they had no recorded children.
In 1892 Bonifacio, a 29-year old widower, met the 18-years old Gregoria de Jess, through his friend Teodoro Plata
who was her cousin. Gregoria, also called Oriang, was the daughter of a prominent citizen and landowner from
Caloocan Kalookan. Gregoria's parents did not agree at first to their relationship as Andres was a freemason and
freemasons were then considered enemies of the Catholic church. Her parents eventually gave in and Andrs and
Gregoria were married through a Catholic ceremony in Binondo Church on March 1893 or 1894. The couple also
were married through Katipunan rites in a friend's house in Sta. Cruz, Manila on the same day of their church
wedding.
They had one son named Andrs, Jr., born on early 1896, who died of smallpox in infancy.
Katipunan[edit]
Main article: Katipunan
On 7 July 1892, the day after Rizal's deportation was announced, Bonifacio and others founded the Katipunan, or in
full, Kataastaasang Kagalanggalangang[6] Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan ("Highest and Most Respected Society
of the Country's Children;" Bayan can also denote community, people, and nation).[7] The secret society sought
independence from Spain through armed revolt.[8][9] It was influenced by Freemasonry through its rituals and
organization, and several members including Bonifacio were also Freemasons.[10]Within the society Bonifacio used
the pseudonym May pag-asa ("There is Hope").[1]
For a time, Bonifacio worked with both the Katipunan and La Liga Filipina. La Liga eventually split because some
members like Bonifacio lost hope for peaceful reform and stopped their monetary aid.[10] The more conservative
members, mostly wealthy members, who still believed in peaceful reforms set up the Cuerpo de Compromisarios,
which pledged continued support to the reformists in Spain. The radicals were subsumed into the Katipunan.[8] From
Manila, the Katipunan expanded to several provinces, including Batangas,Laguna, Cavite, Bulacan, Pampanga,
and Nueva Ecija.[11] Most of its members, called Katipuneros, came from the lower and middle classes, and many of
its local leaders were prominent figures in their municipalities.[12] At first exclusively male, membership was later
extended to females, with Bonifacio's wife Gregoria de Jess as a leading member.[13]
From the beginning, Bonifacio was one of the chief Katipunan officers, although he did not become
its Supremo (supreme leader) or Presidente Supremo (Supreme President)[14]until 1895. He was the third head of
the Katipunan after Deodato Arellano and Romn Basa. Prior to this, he served as the society's comptroller and
then as its fiscal.[15][16] The society had its own laws, bureaucratic structure and elective leadership. For
each province involved, the Katipunan Supreme Council coordinated with provincial councils in charge of public
administration and military affairs, and with local councils in charge of affairs on the district or barrio level.[5][17]
Within the society, Bonifacio developed a strong friendship with Emilio Jacinto, who served as his adviser and
confidant, as well as a member of the Supreme Council. Bonifacio adopted Jacinto's Kartilya primer as the official
teachings of the society in place of his own Decalogue, which he judged as inferior. Bonifacio, Jacinto and Po
Valenzuelacollaborated on the society's organ, Kalayaan (Freedom), which had only one printed issue. Bonifacio
wrote several pieces for the paper, including the poem Pag-ibig sa Tinubang Lup (approx. "Love for One's
Homeland[18]) under the pseudonym Agapito Bagumbayan. The publication of Kalayaan in March 1896 led to a great
increase in the society's membership. The Katipunan movement spread throughout Luzon, to Panay in
the Visayas and even as far as Mindanao.[19] From less than 300 members in January 1896,[11] it had 30,000 to
40,000 by August 1896.[19]
The rapid increase in Katipunan activity drew the suspicion of the Spanish authorities. By early 1896, Spanish
intelligence was aware of the existence of a seditious secret society, and suspects were kept under surveillance and
arrests made. On 3 May, Bonifacio held a general assembly of Katipunan leaders in Pasig, where they debated
when to start the revolution. While some officers, especially Bonifacio, believed a revolution was inevitable, some
members, especially Santiago Alvarez and Emilio Aguinaldo both of Cavite, expressed reservations and
disagreement regarding the planned revolt due to lack of firearms. The consensus was to consult Jos Rizal in
Dapitan before launching armed action, so Bonifacio sent Po Valenzuela to Rizal. Rizal turned out to be against the
revolution, believing it to be premature, He recommended more preparation, but suggested that, in the event the
revolution did break out, they should seek the leadership of Antonio Luna, who was widely regarded as a brilliant
military leader.[20]
Philippine Revolution[edit]
Main article: Philippine Revolution
Bonifacio in Cavite[edit]
There were two Katipunan provincial chapters in Cavite that became rival factions: the Magdalo, headed by Emilio
Aguinaldo's cousin Baldomero Aguinaldo, and the Magdiwang, headed by Mariano lvarez, uncle of Bonifacio's
wife. Leaders of both factions came from the upper class, in contrast to Bonifacio, who came from the lower middle
class. After initial successes, Emilio Aguinaldo issued a manifesto in the name of the Magdalo ruling council which
proclaimed a provisional and revolutionary government despite the existence of the Katipunan government. Emilio
Aguinaldo in particular had won fame for victories in the province.[38] The Magdalo and Magdiwang clashed over
authority and jurisdiction and did not help each other in battle. Bonifacio, as the recognized overall leader of the
revolution, was invited by the Cavite leaders to mediate between them and unify their efforts. After multiple letters
were sent to Bonifacio urging him to come, in December 1896 he traveled to Cavite accompanied by his wife, his
brothers Procopio and Ciriaco, and some troops, including Emilio Jacinto, Bonifacio's secretary and right-hand man.
Jacinto was said to be against Bonifacio's expedition to Cavite.
In Cavite, friction grew between Bonifacio and the Magdalo leaders. Apolinario Mabini, who later served as Emilio
Aguinaldo's adviser, writes that at this point the Magdalo leaders "already paid little heed to his authority and
orders."[35] Bonifacio was partial to the Magdiwang, perhaps due to his kinship ties with Mariano lvarez,[39] or more
importantly, due to their stronger recognition of his authority.[40] When Aguinaldo and Edilberto Evangelista went to
receive Bonifacio at Zapote, they were irritated with what they regarded as his attitude of superiority. In his memoirs
Aguinaldo wrote that Bonifacio acted "as if he were a king".[41][42] Another time, Bonifacio ordered the arrest of
one Katipunan general fromLaguna surnamed Fernandez, who was accompanying the Magdalo leaders in paying
their respect to Bonifacio, for failing to support his attack in Manila, but the other Magdaloleaders refused to
surrender him. Townspeople in Noveleta (a Magdiwang town) acclaimed Bonifacio as the ruler of the Philippines, to
the chagrin of the Magdalo leaders, (Bonifacio replied: "long live Philippine Liberty!").[42] Aguinaldo disputed with
Bonifacio over strategic troop placements and blamed him for the capture of the town of Silang.[41] The Spanish,
through Jesuit Superior Pio Pi, wrote to Aguinaldo about the possibility of peace negotiations.[41] When Bonifacio
found out, he and the Magdiwang council rejected the proposed peace talks. Bonifacio was also angered that the
Spanish considered Aguinaldo the "chief of the rebellion" instead of him.[41] However, Aguinaldo continued to
arrange negotiations which never took place.[43] Bonifacio believed Aguinaldo was willing to surrender the
revolution.[43]
Bonifacio was also subject to rumors that he had stolen Katipunan funds, his sister was the mistress of a priest, and
he was an agent provocateur paid by friars to foment unrest. Also circulated were anonymous letters which told the
people of Cavite not to idolize Bonifacio because he was a Mason, a mere Manila employee, allegedly an atheist,
and uneducated. According to these letters, Bonifacio did not deserve the title of Supremo since only God was
supreme. This last allegation was made despite the fact that Supremo was meant to be used in conjunction
with Presidente, i.e. Presidente Supremo (Supreme President) to distinguish the president of
the Katipunan Supreme Council from council presidents of subordinate Katipunan chapters like
the Magdalo and Magdiwang.[40] Bonifacio suspected the rumor-mongering to be the work of
the Magdalo leader Daniel Tirona. He confronted Tirona, whose airy reply provoked Bonifacio to such anger that he
drew a gun and would have shot Tirona if others had not intervened.[44][45]
On 31 December, Bonifacio and the Magdalo and Magdiwang leaders held a meeting in Imus, ostensibly to
determine the leadership of Cavite in order to end the rivalry between the two factions. The issue of whether the
Katipunan should be replaced by a revolutionary government was brought up by the Magdalo, and this eclipsed the
rivalry issue. The Magdaloargued that the Katipunan, as a secret society, should have ceased to exist once the
Revolution was underway. They also held that Cavite should not be divided. Bonifacio and
theMagdiwang contended that the Katipunan served as their revolutionary government since it had its own
constitution, laws, and provincial and municipal governments. Edilberto Evangelista presented a draft constitution for
the proposed government to Bonifacio but he rejected it as it was too similar to the Spanish Maura Law. Upon the
event of restructuring, Bonifacio was given carte blanche to appoint a committee tasked with setting up a new
government; he would also be in charge of this committee. He tasked Emilio Aguinaldo to record the minutes of the
meeting and requested for it to establish this authority, but these were never done and never provided.[46][47]
The next day, Aguinaldo surreptitiously took his oath of office as President in a chapel officiated by a Catholic priest
Cenon Villafranca who was under the authority of the Roman pope.[55]:109 According to Gen. Santiago Alvarez, guards
were posted outside with strict instructions not to let in any unwanted partisan from the Magdiwang faction while the
oath-taking took place.[56] Artemio Ricarte also took his office "with great reluctance" and made a declaration that he
found the Tejeros elections "dirty or shady" and "not been in conformity with the true will of the
people."[57] Meanwhile Bonifacio met with his remaining supporters and drew up the Acta de Tejeros (Act of Tejeros)
wherein they gave their reasons for not accepting the election results. Bonifacio alleged the election was fraudulent
due to cheating and accused Aguinaldo of treason due to his negotiations with the Spanish.[58] In their memoirs
Santiago lvarez (son of Mariano) and Gregoria de Jess both alleged that many ballots were already filled out
before being distributed, and Guillermo Masangkay contended there were more ballots prepared than voters
present. lvarez writes that Bonifacio had been warned by a Cavite leader Diego Mojica of the rigged ballots before
the votes were canvassed, but he had done nothing.[14][59]
Aguinaldo later sent a delegation to Bonifacio to get him to cooperate, but the latter refused.[60] Bonifacio appointed
Emilio Jacinto general of the rebel forces in Manila, Morong, Bulacan and Nueva Ecija.[61] In Naik, Bonifacio met with
Artemio Ricarte and others, including generals Po del Pilar and Mariano Noriel of the Magdalo who had gone over
to his side.[41] Bonifacio asserted his leadership of the revolution with the Naik Military Agreement, a document which
appointed Pio del Pilar commander-in-chief of the revolutionary forces.[61] Bonifacio's meeting was interrupted by
Aguinaldo himself, and del Pilar and Noriel promptly returned to Aguinaldo's fold.[41] In late April Aguinaldo fully
assumed presidential office after consolidating his position among the Cavite elite most of
Bonifacio's Magdiwang supporters declaring allegiance to Aguinaldo.[62] Aguinaldo's government then ordered the
arrest of Bonifacio, who was then moving out of Cavite.[60][61]
Historical controversies[edit]
The historical assessment of Bonifacio involves several controversial points. His death is alternately viewed as a
justified execution for treason and a "legal murder" fueled by politics. Some historians[who?] consider him to be the
rightful first President of the Philippines instead of Aguinaldo. Some historians[who?] have also called that Bonifacio
share or even take the place of Jos Rizal as the (foremost) Philippine national hero. The purported discovery of
Bonifacio's remains has also been questioned.
charge of conspiracy on the grounds that the latter had been killed in battle, but later the witness was seen with the
prosecutors.[69][70]
Teodoro Agoncillo writes that Bonifacio's declaration of authority in opposition to Aguinaldo posed a danger to the
revolution, because a split in the rebel forces would result in almost certain defeat to their united and well-armed
Spanish foe.[67] In contrast, Renato Constantino contends that Bonifacio was neither a danger to the revolution in
general for he still planned to fight the Spanish, nor to the revolution in Cavite since he was leaving; but Bonifacio
was definitely a threat to the Cavite leaders who wanted control of the Revolution, so he was eliminated.
Constantino contrasts Bonifacio who had no record of compromise with the Spanish with the Cavite leaders who did
compromise, resulting in the Pact of Biak-na-Bato whereas the revolution was officially halted and its leaders exiled,
though many Filipinos continued to fight especially Katipunan leaders used to be close to Bonifacio (Aguinaldo
eventually, unofficially allied with the United States, did return to take charge of the revolution during the Spanish
American War).[71]
Historians[who?] have also discussed the motives of the Cavite government to replace Bonifacio, and whether it had
the right to do so. The Magdalo provincial council which helped establish a republican government led by one of
their own was only one of many such councils in the pre-existing Katipunan government.[72][73] Therefore, Constantino
and Alejo Villanueva write Aguinaldo and his faction may be considered counter-revolutionary as well as guilty of
violating Bonifacio's constituted authority just as they considered Bonifacio to violate theirs.[72][74] Aguinaldo's own
adviser and official Apolinario Mabini writes that he was "primarily answerable for insubordination against the head
of the Katipunan of which he was a member".[35] Aguinaldo's authority was not immediately recognized by all rebels.
If Bonifacio had escaped Cavite, he would have had the right as the Katipunan leader to prosecute Aguinaldo for
treason instead of the other way around.[75] Constantino and Villanueva also interpret the Tejeros Convention as the
culmination of a movement by members of the upper class represented by Aguinaldo to wrest power from Bonifacio
who represented the middle and lower classes.[74][76] Regionalism among the Cavite rebels, dubbed "Cavitismo" by
Constantino, has also been put forward as motivation for the replacement of Bonifacio.[77][78][79] Mabini considered the
execution as criminal and "assassination...the first victory of personal ambition over true patriotism."[citation needed] He
also noted that "All the electors [at the Tejeros Convention] were friends of Don Emilio Aguinaldo and Don Mariano
Tras, who were united, while Bonifacio, although he had established his integrity, was looked upon with distrust
only because he was not a native of the province: this explains his resentment."[35]
There are differing accounts of Bonifacio's manner of execution. The commanding officer of the execution
party, Lazaro Macapagal, said in two separate accounts that the Bonifacio brothers were shot to death, which is the
orthodox interpretation. Macapagal's second account has Bonifacio attempting to escape after his brother is shot,
but he is also killed while running away. Macapagal writes that they buried the brothers in shallow graves dug with
bayonets and marked by twigs.[80]
However, another account states that after his brother was shot, Bonifacio was stabbed and hacked to death. This
was allegedly done while he lay prone in a hammock in which he was carried to the site, being too weak to
walk.[40] This version was maintained by Guillermo Masangkay, who claimed to have gotten this information from one
of Macapagal's men.[80] Also, one account used to corroborate this version is of an alleged eyewitness, a farmer who
claimed he saw five men hacking a man in a hammock.[40] Historian Milagros Guerrero also says Bonifacio was
bayoneted, and that the brothers were left unburied.[81] After bones said to be Bonifacio's including a fractured skull
- were discovered in 1918, Masangkay claimed the forensic evidence supported his version of
events.[80] Writer Adrian Cristobal notes that accounts of Bonifacio's captivity and trial state he was very weak due to
his wounds being left untreated; he thus doubts that Bonifacio was strong enough to make a last dash for freedom
as Macapagal claimed.[40] Historian Ambeth Ocampo, who doubts the Bonifacio bones were authentic, thus also
doubts the possibility of Bonifacio's death by this manner.[80]
The term Tagalog historically refers to an ethnic group, their language, and script. While historians have thus tended
to view Bonifacio's concept of the Philippine nation as restricted to the Tagalog regions of Luzon, as compared to
Aguinaldo's view of Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao (comprising the modern Philippines), Guerrero writes that
Bonifacio and theKatipunan in fact already had an all-encompassing view. The Kartilya defines "tagalog" as "all
those born in this archipelago; therefore, though visayan, ilocano, pampango, etc. they are all tagalogs".[5]
In their memoirs, Emilio Aguinaldo and other Magdalo people claim Bonifacio became the head of the Magdiwang,
receiving the title Har ng Bayan ("King of the People") with Mariano lvarez as his second-incommand.[41][83] However, these claims are unsupported by documentary evidence.[84] Carlos Quirino suggests these
claims stem from a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of Bonifacio's title Pangulo ng Haring Bayan ("President
of the Sovereign Nation").[84] Santiago lvarez (son of Mariano) distinguishes between the Magdiwang government
and the Katipunan Supreme Council headed by Bonifacio.[14]
Bonifacio's bones[edit]
In 1918, the American colonial government of the Philippines mounted a search for Bonifacio's remains in
Maragondon. A group consisting of government officials, former rebels, and a man reputed to be Bonifacio's servant
found bones which they claimed were Bonifacio's in a sugarcane field on 17 March. The bones were placed in an
urn and put into the care of the National Library of the Philippines. They were housed at the Library's headquarters
in the Legislative Building in Ermita, Manila, together with some of Bonifacio's papers and personal belongings. The
authenticity of the bones was much disputed at the time and has been challenged as late as 2001 by Ambeth
Ocampo. When Emilio Aguinaldo ran for President of the Commonwealth of the Philippines in 1935, his
opponent Manuel L. Quezon (the eventual victor) invoked the memory of Bonifacio against him, the bones being the
result of Bonifacio's execution at Aguinaldo's hands. During World War II, the Philippines was invaded by Japan in
1941. The bones were lost due to the widespread destruction and looting during the Allied capture of Manila in
February 1945.[