EC 2301 Digital Communication Unit I and II Question Bank
EC 2301 Digital Communication Unit I and II Question Bank
k J
J
k k
k
k
Figure 3.10 Two types of quantization: (a) midtread and (b) midrise.
Quantization Noise:
Figure 3.11 Illustration of the quantization process
(3.28)
12
1
) ( ] [
(3.26)
otherwise
2 2
, 0
,
1
) (
levels of number total : ,
(3.25)
2
is size - step the
type midrise the of quantizer uniform a Assuming
(3.24) ) 0 ] [ ( ,
(3.23)
value sample of variable
random by the denoted be error on quantizati Let the
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 2 2
max max
max
dq q dq q f q Q E
q
q f
L m m m
L
m
M E V M Q
m q
q Q
Q Q
Q
). (bandwidth increasing lly with exponentia increases (SNR)
(3.33) )2
3
(
) (
) ( of power average the denote Let
(3.32) 2
3
1
(3.31)
2
2
(3.30) log
sample per bits of number the is where
(3.29) 2
form, binary in expressed is sample quatized When the
o
2
2
max
2
o
2 2
max
2
2
max
R
m
P
P
SNR
t m P
m
m
L R
R
L
R
Q
R
Q
R
R
3.Explain PCM in detail.
5.Explain DPCM in detail.
6.Explain Delta modulation in detail.
7.Explain ADM in detail.
8.Compare all the digital modulation techniques.
9.Explain Linear prediction in detail.
Linear Prediction (to reduce the sampling rate):
Consider a finite-duration impulse response (FIR)
discrete-time filter which consists of three blocks :
1. Set of p ( p: prediction order) unit-delay elements (z-1)
2. Set of multipliers with coefficients w1,w2,wp
3. Set of adders ( )
(3.62)
2
have we (3.61) and (3.60) (3.59) From
minimize to , , , Find
(3.61) error) square (mean
be e performanc of index Let the
(3.60)
is error prediction The
(3.59) ) (
is ) input the of predition linear (The output filter The
1 1
1
2
2 1
2
1
p
j
p
k
k j
p
k
k
p
p
k
k
k n x j n x E w w
k n x n x E w n x E J
J w w w
n e E J
n x n x n e
k n x w n x
equations Hopf - Wiener called are (3.64)
(3.64) 2 1 ,
0 2 2
(3.63) 2
as simplify may We
) (
ation autocorrel The
) (
0) ]] [ [ ( mean zero with process stationary is ) ( Assume
1
1
1 1 1
2
2
2 2 2
,p , , k k R k R j k R w
j k R w k R
w
J
j k R w w k R w J
J
k n x n x E k R kT R
n x E
n x E n x E
n x E t X
p
j
X X X j
p
j
X j X
k
p
j
p
k
X k j
p
k
X k X
X
s
X
X
2
min
1
1 2
0
2
1
2
1 1
2
min
2 1 0
1
0
1
than less always is 0,
(3.67)
2
yields (3.63) into (3.64) ng Substituti
, , 1 , 0
0 2 1
2 0 1
1 1 0
]] [ ],..., 2 [ ], 1 [ [
, , , where
(3.66) exists if , as
X X X
T
X
X X
T
X X
T
X X
p
k
X k X
p
k
X k
p
k
X k X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X
T
X X X X
T
p
X X X
J
k R w
k R w k R w J
p R R R
R p R p R
p R R R
p R R R
p R R R
w w w
r R r
r R r w r
R
r
w
r R w R
Figure 3.27
Block diagram illustrating the linear adaptive prediction process