2 - Why Blogs Are An Open Door
2 - Why Blogs Are An Open Door
com
British Journalism Review
DOI: 10.1177/0956474807080945
2007; 18; 41 British Journalism Review
Kim Fletcher
Why blogs are an open door
http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/2/41
The online version of this article can be found at:
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
can be found at: British Journalism Review Additional services and information for
http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Email Alerts:
http://bjr.sagepub.com/subscriptions Subscriptions:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Reprints:
http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav Permissions:
by per seus on October 31, 2008 http://bjr.sagepub.com Downloaded from
Reporters always faced two hurdles on the death knock. The rst was
getting over the doorstep. The second was laying hands on the family album.
I never found the second as bad as the rst: if you could only get in the house,
it wasnt so hard to turn the talk to the physical appearance of the late spouse
or child and the question that followed: You dont have a picture, do you? A
few platitudes about the smiling face in the holiday snap and the big moment:
Could I borrow this? Then, with luck, you would be away, job done, trying
not to think about the pain left in your wake.
Nowadays its possible to pick up a picture without going out of the
ofce, thanks to the millions who present themselves to public gaze on the
internet. Helpful quotes are available too. The famous and the unknown put
up their lives for scrutiny on social networking sites such as MySpace and
Facebook, offering photos, diaries and descriptions of their interests and
their friends. If anything should happen that makes them interesting to a
wider public an untimely death, a reported involvement in a crime, some
injudicious email at work those self-portraits and life stories are available to
any journalist who trawls the sites.
This was the journalistic shortcut used after Seung-Hui Cho shot dead 32
staff and fellow students at the American university Virginia Tech in April,
as the media around the world discovered not only that local bloggers were
putting up graphic accounts of what had happened, but also that they could
pull details of some of the dead from the students own web pages, posted on
social sites. As The Daily Telegraphs Shane Richmond explained to website
readers: It should be part of every journalists tool kit. All of us should know
how to search Technorati, Flickr, YouTube, MySpace etc. But, as Richmond
also acknowledged, this initiative raises questions: is it safe to lift stuff off
Why blogs are
an open door
Kim Fletcher
Kim Fletcher; DOI: 10.1177/0956474807080945; [2007/6] 18:2; 41-46; http://bjr.sagepub.com
by per seus on October 31, 2008 http://bjr.sagepub.com Downloaded from
the web in this manner? Is it ethical to do so? Many who put the stuff up in the
rst place say it isnt, not least the actress Gillian Anderson, who was upset to
nd thoughts written for her ofcial website broadcast to a larger audience.
She wrote later: The fact is, I have not written to the site in a while because I
have quite frankly been afraid to. I was shocked or rather appalled that my
last entry of ramblings was published. What happened? When did
Everything and Everything become mass public consumption? Since when
have I been writing a BLOG!!??? What happened to PERMISSION??!! I am so
naive. So, needless to say, I am a bit aumoxed, ummoxed, autter? Angry,
about the situation and what is safe to write about anymore.
The tone is typical of the way people write on websites. And I should say
that I, too, am transgressing the rule laid out by Ms Anderson at the start of
her piece. It reads: NOTE: This message is exclusively for Gillians fans who
visit this web site. Please do not publish the contents (partially or in full)
anywhere else on or off the internet. It should be said that this is not a
warning calculated to work with journalists. But Ms Anderson is by no
means alone among web users in believing that websites should be accorded a
private status never granted to the published word elsewhere. The debate
will increase as journalists realise how much information is out there.
The likely suspect
We saw the dramatic effect of web material during the inquiry into the
murders of ve prostitutes in Ipswich, Suffolk, at the end of last year, when
police arrested a former special constable, Tom Stephens. He had already
attracted media interest, having described himself as a likely suspect in an
interview with the Sunday Mirror, and given an interview to the BBC about
his relationship with the dead women. Stephens was arrested shortly
afterwards, at which point there was joy among the media to discover his
entry on MySpace.
In the old days, reporters would have pieced together something of his
character by tramping round relatives and friends prepared to talk. They
might have come up with a few pictures, typically years out of date.
Naturally, the door-stepping began. But, thanks to MySpace, they had for
starters pictures of the suspect alongside the kind of self-description that
everyone knows spells serial killer: he called himself The Bishop, wore an
army combat hat and wrote that he was interested in keeping t. Conclusive,
except that Stephens was, of course, released by police shortly afterwards
B
r
i
t
i
s
h
J
o
u
r
n
a
l
i
s
m
R
e
v
i
e
w
v
o
l
.
1
8
n
o
.
2
j
u
n
e
2
0
0
7