0% found this document useful (0 votes)
72 views26 pages

Signalling Model

This document summarizes a model of corporate financing and signaling through capital structure. The model shows that firms can signal private information about their cash flow type through the level of debt issued. A separating equilibrium exists where high-cash flow firms issue more debt than low-cash flow firms. Debt levels signal firm type to the capital market and update beliefs. The debt level survives various refinement criteria to uniquely determine the signaling equilibrium. A second model examines signaling through the fraction of equity retained by entrepreneurs. A separating equilibrium exists where high-cash flow entrepreneurs retain a larger equity stake than low-cash flow entrepreneurs. This signals firm type and updates capital market beliefs. The entrepreneur's optimal retention level increases with information asymmetry and decreases with

Uploaded by

raqthesolid
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
72 views26 pages

Signalling Model

This document summarizes a model of corporate financing and signaling through capital structure. The model shows that firms can signal private information about their cash flow type through the level of debt issued. A separating equilibrium exists where high-cash flow firms issue more debt than low-cash flow firms. Debt levels signal firm type to the capital market and update beliefs. The debt level survives various refinement criteria to uniquely determine the signaling equilibrium. A second model examines signaling through the fraction of equity retained by entrepreneurs. A separating equilibrium exists where high-cash flow entrepreneurs retain a larger equity stake than low-cash flow entrepreneurs. This signals firm type and updates capital market beliefs. The entrepreneur's optimal retention level increases with information asymmetry and decreases with

Uploaded by

raqthesolid
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26

Corporate Finance:

Asymmetric information and capital


structure signaling
Yossi Spiegel
Recanati School of Business
Ross, BJE 1977
The Determination of Financial
Structure: The Incentive-Signalling
Approach
Corporate Finance 3
The model
The timing:
Cash flow is x ~ U[0,T], where T {L,H}, L < H
T is private info. to the firm
The capital market believes that T = H with prob.
In case of bankruptcy, the manager bears a personal loss C
The managers utility: U = V C x Prob. of bankruptcy
The firm issues
debt with face
value D
Stage 0 Stage 2
Stage 1
The capital market
observes D and
updates the belief
about the firms type
Cash flow is realized
Corporate Finance 4
The full information case
The value of the firm when T is common knowledge:
With uniform dist.:
The managers utility:
The manager will not issue debt
T
D
C x D F C x U
T T
= =

) (

( )
T
T
D
T
D
D
T
x x dF D x x DdF x xdF V

) ( ) ( ) (
0
= +
(

+ =

2 /

T x
T
=
Corporate Finance 5
Asymmetric information
D
T
* is the debt level of type T
B* is the prob. that the capital market
assigns to the firm being of type T
Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium (PBE),
(D
H
*,D
L
*,B*):
D
H
* and D
L
* are optimal given B*
B* is consistent with the Bayes rule
Corporate Finance 6
Bayes rule
In our case, two levels of D are chosen. Suppose the probability that each type
plays them is as follows:
Having observed D
1
the capital market believes that the firm is type H with
prob.:
In a sep. equil., h
1
= 1 and l
1
= 0. In a pooling equil., h
1
= l
1
= 1
( )
( )
( ) B P
A P A B P
B A P
) ( |
| =
l
2
l
1
Type L (1)
h
2
h
1
Type H ()
D
2
D
1
( )
( )
( ) ) 1 (
) ( |
|
1 1
1
1
1
1


+
= =
l h
h
D P
H P H D P
D H P
Corporate Finance 7
Separating equilibria: D
H
* D
L
*
The belief function:
In a separating equil., D
L
* = 0 because
type L cannot boost V by issuing debt
D
L
* = 0 B*(0) = 0 V(0) = L/2

=
=
=
w o
D D
D D
B
L
H
/ '
* 0
* 1
*

Corporate Finance 8
Separating equilibrium
The IC of H:
The IC of L:
Indifference of type T between V and D:
{
0 D when
H of Payoff
D issues it when
H of Payoff
2
=

L
H
D
C V
43 42 1
{
43 42 1
D issues it when
L of Payoff
0 D when
L of Payoff
2 L
D
C V
L

=
{
T
D
C
L
V
T
D
C V
L
+ = =
=
2 2
V value induces it if
D issuing when Payoff
0 D if
Payoff
43 42 1
Corporate Finance 9
The set of separating equilibria
D
L
D
C
L
V + =
2
H
D
C
L
V + =
2
2
H
V =
2
L
V =
V
D* D**
sep. equil.
D* is defined by
L/2+CxD/L = H/2
D* = (H-L)L/2C
Corporate Finance 10
The DOM criterion
D D* is a dominated strategy for type L: D = 0 always guarantees L a higher
payoff no matter what the capital market believes
The DOM criterion:
The idea: type L will never play D D* while type H might. Hence, if D D*,
then the firms type must be H
The DOM criterion still does not determine the beliefs for D < D* and D 0
Under the DOM criterion: D
L
* = 0, D
H
*=D*

=
=
=
w o
D D
D D
D D
B
L
H
/ '
* 1
* 0
* 1
*

Corporate Finance 11
Separating equilibria under the
DOM criterion
D
L
D
C
L
V + =
2
H
D
C
L
V + =
2
2
H
V =
2
L
V =
V
D* D**
D
L
* = 0, D
H
*=D*
Corporate Finance 12
Pooling equilibria: D
H
* = D
L
* = D
p
*
The belief function:
In a pooling equil., the choice of D
p
*
is uninformative; hence

=
=
w o
D D
B
p
/ '
*
*

( )
2
1
2

L H
V + =
Corporate Finance 13
The set of pooling equilibria
D
L
D
C
L
V + =
2
H
D
C
L
V + =
2
2
H
V =
2
L
V =
V
D* D**
pooling
equil.
V V

=
Corporate Finance 14
The DOM criterion
The DOM criterion:
The DOM criterion eliminates some
pooling equilibria but not all

=
=
w o
D D
D D
B
p
/ '
* 1
*
*

Corporate Finance 15
The set of pooling equilibria
D
L
D
C
L
V + =
2
H
D
C
L
V + =
2
2
H
V =
2
L
V =
V
D* D**
pooling
equil.
V V

=
Corporate Finance 16
The intuitive criterion
Due to Cho and Kreps, QJE 1987
Fix a equilibrium (D
L
*, D
H
*) and consider a deviation from this
equilibrium to D. If the deviation never benefits type x (even if it
induces the most favorable beliefs by the capital market) but can
benefit type y, then the deviation was played by type y
The intuitive criterion:
The intuitive criterion still does not determine the beliefs everywhere

=
=
w o
D D
D D
B
p
p
/ '
* by dominated is 1
*
*

Corporate Finance 17
The set of pooling equilibria under
the intuitive criterion
D
L
D
C
L
V + =
2
H
D
C
L
V + =
2
2
H
V =
2
L
V =
V
D* D**
pooling
equil.
V V

=
The intuitive
criterion
eliminates all
pooling equil.
Corporate Finance 18
Conclusions
The only equilibrium which survives the intuitive
criterion is D
L
* = 0 and D
H
* = D*
This equilibrium is the Pareto undominated separating
equilibrium and it is called the Riley outcome
Debt can be used as a signal of high cash flow
The debt of type H:
D* when L, H-L, and C, D* is independent of !
( )
C
L L H
D
H
L
D
C
L
2
*
2 2

= = +
Leland and Pyle, JF 1977
Informational asymmetries, financial
structure, and financial intermediation
Corporate Finance 20
The model
The timing:
Cash flow is x ~ [0,), with Ex = x
T
and Var(x)=
2
, where T {L,H}, x
L
< x
H
T is private info. to the firm
The capital market believes that T = H with prob.
The entrepreneurs expected utility:
An entrepreneur
sell a fraction 1- of
the firm to outside
equityholders
Stage 0 Stage 2
Stage 1
The capital market
observes 1- and
updates the belief
about the firms type
Cash flow is realized
( ) ( )V x W W Var
b
EW W EU
T T T T
+ = = 1 ) (
2
Corporate Finance 21
The full information case
The variance of W
T
:
The entrepreneurs expected utility:
Under full info., V = x
T
:
* = 0 The entrepreneur will sell the entire firm
Why? Because the entrepreneur is risk-averse and the capital
market is risk-neutral
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
2 2
2
2
1


= =
+ =
T
T T
x x E
EW V x E W Var
( ) ( )
3 2 1
4 43 4 42 1
) (
2 2
2
1
x Var
EW
T T
b
V x W EU
T
+ =
( )
2 2
2
=
b
x W EU
T T
Corporate Finance 22
Asymmetric information

T
* is the equity participation of type T
B* is the prob. that the capital market
assigns to the firm being of type T
Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium (PBE),
(
H
*,
L
*,B*):

H
* and
L
* are optimal given B*
B* is consistent with the Bayes rule
Corporate Finance 23
Separating equilibria:
H
*
L
*
The belief function:
In a separating equil.,
L
* = 0 because
type L cannot boost V by keeping equity

L
* = 0 B*(0) = 0 V(0) = x
L

=
=
=
w o
B
L
H
/ '
* 0
* 1
*



Corporate Finance 24
Separating equilibrium
The IC of H:
The IC of L:
Indifference of type T between V and :
( )
{
0 when
H of Payoff
firm the of fraction a keeps he when H of Payoff
2 2
2
1
=
+


L H
x
b
V x
4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 2 1
{
( )
4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 2 1
firm the of fraction a keeps he when L of Payoff
2 2
0 when
L of Payoff
2
1


b
V x x
L L
+
=
{
( )

= + =
=
1 2 1 2
1
2 2
V value a induces it if firm the of
fraction a keeping when Payoff
2 2
0 if
Payoff
b x x
V
b
V x x
T L
T L
4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 2 1
Corporate Finance 25
The set of separating equilibria

+ =
1 2
2 2
b
x V
L
H
x V =
L
x V =
V
* **
sep.
equil.

=
1 2 1
2 2
b x x
V
H L
( )
2
*
2

b
x x
Z Z Z Z
L H

+ + =
Corporate Finance 26
The Riley outcome
Using Ls IC, the ownership share of type H is:
* increases with Z which
increases with the extent of asymmetric info., x
H
-x
L
decreases with risk aversion, b
decreases with the variance of cash flows,
2
Using Hs IC:
** < 1 iff 2(x
H
x
L
)< b
2
; otherwise, type H prefers every > 0 over = 0
provided that he convinces outsiders that the firms type is H
{
( )
{
( ) 2 *
2
1
2
H is type his that believes market the and
firm the of fraction a keeps he when L of Payoff
2 2
0 when
L of Payoff
+ + = + =

=
Z Z Z
b
x x x
b
x x
H L L
L H


4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 2 1
{
( )
( )
2
H is type his that believes market the and
firm the of fraction a keeps he when H of Payoff
2 2
0 when
H of Payoff
2
* *
2
1



b
x x b
x x x
L H
H H L

= + =
=
4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 2 1

You might also like