This document discusses the author's process in creating their first track for an assignment on better mixes. They began by importing a MIDI file from a previous composition to use as the basis for the new track. They applied EQ and compression to the track, but realized upon learning more about the proper use of these tools that their decisions were not optimal. The document then explains how to properly use EQ to refine sounds rather than just increase levels, and how compression works to reduce dynamic range while preventing clipping. It provides examples of adjusting compression threshold, ratio, attack, and release to achieve the desired effect.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
75 views3 pages
Better Mixes Write Up
This document discusses the author's process in creating their first track for an assignment on better mixes. They began by importing a MIDI file from a previous composition to use as the basis for the new track. They applied EQ and compression to the track, but realized upon learning more about the proper use of these tools that their decisions were not optimal. The document then explains how to properly use EQ to refine sounds rather than just increase levels, and how compression works to reduce dynamic range while preventing clipping. It provides examples of adjusting compression threshold, ratio, attack, and release to achieve the desired effect.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
T4.
2 Better Mixes Track One
My first track for T4.2 Better Mixes was electronic/classical crossover based on a previous composition, whose main theme is heard at 2.08. My initial idea in this track was to cover two genres I enjoy listening to, electronic dance music and classical cinematic music. I applied EQ and compression to all of my channels in ways that may seem unorthodox but were applied to create sounds I thought were good. Now I have learnt about the actual process and how it can be used to refine a sound, my decisions seem confusing. I began creating the track by importing a MIDI file (opening strings) from a former composition to base the new track on. This channel I applied EQ and compression to along with a reverb insert and stereo enhancer, enhancing the stereo image. An equalizer in Cubase is much like any other DAW with a parametric equalizer. A parametric equalizer lets you adjust most or all of its frequency parameters: The centre frequency, the amount of boost or cut and the Q factor or band width. To the opening strings, I boosted the bass frequencies around 271.0Hz by 13.4 dB with a wide Q factor, by doing this I increased all of the low shelf frequencies or bass frequencies down to around 20 HZ. I also increased the gain of frequencies around 1351.0 Hz by 17.8 dB again with a wide Q factor increasing the volume of the high shelf frequencies or treble frequencies up to around 20KHz. I further went on the increase the gain of frequencies around 897 Hz and 4458 Hz to add a little more depth and colour into the channel both using a very wide Q factor. Looking back at this attempt at equalizing a channel, I notice that all I have really done is increased the overall gain of the channel causing it to peak at a higher dBFS (decibels relative to full scale) and potentially clip as at exceeds zero dBFS later on in the track, instead of refining the sound whereas instead, I should have removed the unnecessary frequencies and left the good, instead of increasing them.
To solve the issue to an increasing gain level in the channel and preventing digital distortion (clipping), I explored the use of compression. Compression is a way in which the producer of a track can reduce the increase the headroom of the stereo output and the dynamic range of their composition. The dynamic range is the difference between the quietest point in a track and the loudest point. But how the dynamic range is used can be tricky, for example, a singer might get caught up in the moment and let out an impassioned scream, followed by a soft whispery passage, the mics signal will jump from its current recording level into severe distortion. To battle this a compressor can be applied. A compressor is a sort of, automatic fader, used to proportionately reduce the dynamics of a signal that rises above a set level. Usually found as an insert in a DAW. On Cubase and most other software, the compressor allows adjustment to seven parameters: Threshold, Ratio, Make-up, attack, hold, release and analysis. The main five parameters which affect the sound the most are: The threshold essentially reduces the gain by limiting how much of an audio signal passes through the thresholds level. You can explain how the threshold works using a ruler.
In Example A, the compressor isnt doing anything because the threshold is set at 0dB. As the threshold is reduced in dB seen in Example B, the compressor begins to work, reducing the gain of anything that passes through the threshold. The compression ratio is a control that determines the amount of input signal required to cause a 1dB increase at the compressors output. For example, with a ratio of 4:1, for every 4dB increase at the input, there will only be a 1dB increase at the output. The compression output/make up gain is used to determine how much signal will be sent to the devices output and is used to boost the reduced dynamic signal into a range where it can be better heard in the mix. The compressor also has attack and release parameters. Compression Attack, (measured in Example A Example B milliseconds or 1/1000 of a second) determines how fast or slow the device will reduce a signal that exceeds the threshold. It is defined as the time taken for the gain to decrease to a percentage, usually 63% of its final gain value. Setting a fast attack on an instrument with a long sustain, such as a bass guitar, might be audible, possibly creating a sound that pumps the signals dynamics. In this situation, it would be best to use a slow attack setting. On the other hand, setting a slow attack time, might not give the compressor enough time to react to sharp, transient sound such as a hi-hat. In this case, a fast attack time would work better. And finally the release, which, similar to attack, is used to determine how slowly or quickly the device will restore a signal to its original dynamic level once it has fallen below the threshold. Too fast a release and the compressor will create an audible pumping sound whilst too slow might affect the dynamics during the transition from a loud to soft passage. The compression I applied to the strings channel, although it is functioning, it does not have any major audible effect whereas a change in sound can be heard when bypassing the compressor on the first bass. By reducing the threshold to -38.9 dB with a ratio of 3.16:1 and a make-up gain level of 4.2dB, I reduced the bass from a loud, punchy sound to a quieter but still punchy sound but subtle enough not to overpower the rest of the mix. I also applied an attack of 0.1ms because the bass part uses quick staccato notes.