Invited Review

Aspartame, low-calorie sweeteners and disease: Regulatory safety

and epidemiological issues
Marina Marinovich
a,
, Corrado L. Galli
a
, Cristina Bosetti
b
, Silvano Gallus
b
, Carlo La Vecchia
b,c
a
Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Universit degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
b
Department of Epidemiology, IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Via Giuseppe La Masa 19, 20156 Milan, Italy
c
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Universit degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 5 April 2013
Accepted 14 July 2013
Available online 23 July 2013
Keywords:
Aspartame
Sweeteners
Toxicity
Cancer risk
a b s t r a c t
Aspartame is a synthetic sweetener that has been used safely in food for more than 30 years. Its safety has
been evaluated by various regulatory agencies in accordance with procedures internationally recognized,
and decisions have been revised and updated regularly. The present review summarizes the most rele-
vant conclusions of epidemiological studies concerning the use of low-calorie sweeteners (mainly aspar-
tame), published between January 1990 and November 2012. In the Nurses Health study and the Health
Professionals Followup study some excess risk of Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma was found
in men but not in women; no association was found with leukemia. In the NIH-AARP Diet and Health
Study, there was no association between aspartame and haematopoietic neoplasms. US case-control
studies of brain and haematopoietic neoplasms also showed no association. The NIH-AARP Diet and
Health Study and case-control studies from California showed no association with pancreatic cancer,
and a case-control study from Denmark found no relation with breast cancer risk. Italian case-control
studies conducted in 19912008 reported no consistent association for cancers of the upper aerodigestive
tract, digestive tract, breast, endometrium, ovary, prostate, and kidney. Low calorie sweeteners were not
consistently related to vascular events and preterm deliveries.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The safety assessment procedure in the case of both natural and
synthetic food additives and various contaminants is well estab-
lished (EFSA, 2011a,b,c). The rst phase involves the identication
of the hazard, namely the inherent ability of the molecule to cause
damage, using in silico models and various in vitro and in vivo
experimental conditions. Recently, the European Food Safety
Authority (EFSA) recommended a tiered approach for the testing
of food additives that balances data requirements, animal welfare
and risk, based on proposed uses and exposure assessment (EFSA,
2012). For aspartame, an extensive database of studies conducted
to establish safety-in-use is available.
Regardless of the approach used for evaluation, a health-based
guidance value, such as the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) for a food
additive, is derived from the lowest No-Observed-Adverse-Effect
Level (NOAEL), or the BenchMark Dose Lower condence limit
(BMDL) obtained in studies conducted according to internationally
recognized test protocols. An ADI is set by dividing the NOAEL or
BMDL by an uncertainty factor (usually an uncertainty factor of
100 in the case of animal studies).
The potential health impact posed by the presence of chemical
hazards in food is estimated by calculating the likelihood that the
consumer will be exposed to a substance and quantifying the ex-
tent of such exposure in relation to the health-based guidance va-
lue. Exposure assessments combine data on concentrations of a
chemical substance present in food with data on the quantity of
those foods consumed.
The exposure assessment is intended to cover the population,
taking into account the variation in food consumption across coun-
tries and between various groups of the population, in particular
those considered sensitive such as children and the elderly. This
process is often highly conservative if, in the calculation of the
exposure, the maximum permitted level in food is used together
with the maximum amount of food consumed (worst case
approach).
In the present paper, we review key aspects of the toxicity of
aspartame and the related epidemiologic evidence.
2. Regulatory history
Aspartame is a dipeptide articial sweetener composed of the
amino acids phenylalanine and aspartic acid plus a small quantity
0278-6915/$ - see front matter 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2013.07.040

Corresponding author. Address: DiSFeB, University of Milan, Via Balzaretti 9,

20133 Milan, Italy. Tel.: +39 02 50318316.
E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Marinovich).
Food and Chemical Toxicology 60 (2013) 109115
Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
Food and Chemical Toxicology
j our nal homepage: www. el sevi er . com/ l ocat e/ f oodchemt ox
of methanol (Butchko et al., 2002a,b). It is 200 times sweeter than
sucrose. Since its approval, aspartame has been used in more than
6000 different type of products including soft drinks, dessert
mixes, frozen desserts and yogurt, chewable multi-vitamins,
breakfast cereals, tabletop sweeteners and pharmaceuticals
(Renczogullari et al., 2004), and consumed by millions of people
around the world (Butchko and Stargel, 2001; Fry, 1999).
Following internationally recognized approaches, key regula-
tory authorities around the world, including the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, 1984), and the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Com-
mittee on Food Additives (JECFA) (JECFA, 1980), dened health-
based guidance values that regulate the use of aspartame in more
than 100 countries. In Europe, scientic bodies responsible for
advising on the safety of sweeteners were the Scientic Committee
for Food (SCF from 1974 until April 2003), the EFSA Panel on Food
Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact
with Food (from 2003 to 2008), and currently the EFSA Panel on
Food Additives and Nutrient Sources Added to Food (ANS, from
2008 to present).
These advisory bodies and agencies, working independently,
have set ADIs for aspartame of 50 mg/kg/day in the U.S. (FDA,
1984), 040 mg/kg bw (JECFA, 1980), and 040 mg/kg bw in Euro-
pean Union based on the NOAEL of 4 g/kg bw/day in long-term rat
studies (SCF, 1985). Further reviews of aspartame data were car-
ried out in 1988, 1997, 2002 by the SCF (SCF, 1989, 1997, 2002)
and more recently by EFSA (2005, 2006, 2009, 2011). An ADI of
7.5 mg/kg bw/day was also established for a minor cyclic dipeptide
derivative of aspartame, a diketopiperazine (DKP), which is formed
in some aqueous solutions (JECFA, 1980; SCF, 1985).
In the USA the estimated intake of aspartame as sweetener is
about 1/10 of the ADI (Butchko et al., 2002a,b), and even exposure
by heavy aspartame consumers does not exceed 30% of the ADI
(Magnuson et al., 2007). To reach an intake equivalent to the
ADI, an adult weighting 60 kg would need to drink on a daily basis
and throughout his lifespan, 12 cans (about 4 l) of soft drinks con-
taining aspartame at the maximumlevel permitted. In this unlikely
case, of reaching the ADI, the adult would be exposed to a dose that
is one-hundredth of the dose without any effect in the animal long-
term experiments.
Mean per capita consumption in a U.S. dietary intake survey
including 9701 individuals (Magnuson et al., 2007) was
330.17 mg/day (4.85 mg/kg bw/day), and the 90th percentile mean
per capita consumption was 704.8 mg/day (10.43 mg/kg bw/day).
Additional analysis of the consumption of aspartame when con-
sumed as a food additive showed that the 3039 years age group
consumed the greatest amount of aspartame, while men consume
more aspartame than women.
Hence in addition to the prompt review and opinions on studies
that reported evidence of toxic effects, such as different types of tu-
mours and pre-term delivery (EFSA, 2006, 2009, 2011a,b,c), in Jan-
uary 2013 EFSA launched a public consultation on its draft
scientic opinion on the safety of the articial sweetener aspar-
tame (EFSA, 2013).
3. Toxicity
The acute toxicity of aspartame, tested in rats, mice, rabbits and
dogs, was very low. Sub-chronic toxicity was also low. Aspartame
was found to be non-genotoxic in in vitro and in vivo studies
(Renczogullari et al., 2004; Jeffrey and Williams, 2000; Sasaki
et al., 2002; NTP, 2005).
Since, after ingestion aspartame, is very efciently hydrolysed,
one of the main concerns derives from the products of hydrolysis,
comprising about 50% phenylalanine (50%), aspartic acid (40%) and
methanol (10%) (Ranney et al., 1975), and from the presence of
degradation products such as 5-benzyl-3,6-dioxo-2-piperazine
acetic acid (DPK) and b-aspartame.
These components are then absorbed into the blood and further
metabolized. They do not accumulate in the body and are handled
by the organism in the same ways as those derived from other
foods. The metabolites of aspartame are indeed found in many
common foods for example non-fat milk, tomato juice, etc. (Butch-
ko et al., 2002a,b); the diet typically contains about 60 times more
aspartic acid than that which could be released from food contain-
ing aspartame, on a daily basis. Similarly, the daily diet contains 35
times more phenylalanine than that derived from aspartame-con-
taining foods.
SCF and EFSA considered methanol formation in their safety
assessments of aspartame (SCF 1985, 2002; EFSA, 2013) They also
considered new studies on rodents (Soffritti et al., 2006), and the
suggestion by some authors (Soffritti et al., 2010; Halldorsson,
2010) that methanol was responsible for the potential carcinoge-
nicity and toxicity of aspartame. The SCF and later EFSA concluded
that the data available do not indicate a genotoxic and carcinogenic
concern for methanol derived from aspartame intake. For average
consumers of aspartame, the contribution of aspartame to the
overall exposure to methanol reached 10% at the maximum in
the general population. Methanol is a natural breakdown product
of many commonly consumed foods, and is harmless at doses com-
parable to those likely to be experienced following the consump-
tion of aspartame at doses below the ADI. The methanol
produced during the digestion of aspartame is identical to that
which is provided in much larger amounts from many fruits, veg-
etables and their juices. For example, a glass of tomato juice pro-
vides about 6 times as much methanol as an equivalent amount
of diet beverage sweetened with aspartame. Methanol rapidly en-
ters the portal circulation and is oxidized in the liver to formalde-
hyde, which is further oxidized to formic acid to give CO
2
.
Formaldehyde has a half-life of about 1.5 min, therefore there is
no accumulation in the tissue.
To evaluate if the phenylalanine derived from aspartame could
be of concern in terms of potential developmental effects in hu-
mans, the EFSA ANS panel (EFSA, 2013) carried out a risk character-
ization based on comparison of plasma phenylalanine levels
following aspartame administration with plasma phenylalanine
levels associated with developmental effects in children born to
phenylketonuria (PKU) mothers (patients with a severe reduction
of the metabolism of phenylalanine). For PKU patients, it is recom-
mended that plasma levels of phenylalanine should not exceed
360 lM, of which 120 lM is normally obtained from the regular
diet. The remaining 240 lM plasma concentration has been calcu-
lated to be equivalent to a bolus administration of 103 mg aspar-
tame/kg b.w. in normal subjects, and of 59 mg aspartame/kg
b.w., for PKU heterozygous patients (subjects with moderate
reduction of the metabolism of phenylalanine) (EFSA, 2013). Con-
sequently, EFSA concluded that exposures at or below the ADI were
not of safety concern for the endpoints of reproductive and devel-
opmental toxicity in normal and PKU heterozygous population.
In addition to methanol and phenylalanine, the draft EFSA re-
evaluation of aspartame also presented a risk evaluation for 5-ben-
zyl-3,6-dioxo-2-piperazine acetic acid (DPK) (a degradation prod-
uct of aspartame), reaching the conclusion that there are no
scientic reasons to modify the ADI for aspartame (EFSA, 2013;
Stegink et al., 1995, 1990).
Further safety issues were raised when the European Ramazzini
Foundation on Oncology and Environmental Sciences (ERF) re-
leased two studies claiming that aspartame can increase various
malignancies in rats and concluding that aspartame is a potential
carcinogen at normal dietary doses (Soffritti et al., 2006). The
studies were a large lifetime rat study using 7 dose groups and
100150 rat/sex/group and a lifetime rat study using only two dose
110 M. Marinovich et al. / Food and Chemical Toxicology 60 (2013) 109115
groups and 70 rats/sex/group, but including prenatal exposure to
aspartame (Soffritti et al., 2007). The ndings claimed an increase
in malignant tumour-bearing animals, lymphomas/leukemias
(in females), transitional cell carcinomas of renal pelvis and ureter,
malignant schwannomas of peripheral nerves in the rst study,
while an increase in malignant tumour-bearing animals, lympho-
mas/leukemias (in males) and mammary carcinomas was
claimed in the second study. There were many critical points in
these studies. First of all, the design of the study where male and
female SpragueDawley rats were administered aspartame
(2000, 400, or 0 ppm) were fed from the 12th day of fetal life until
natural death (Soffritti et al., 2007), is in contrast with OECD test
guideline 451 and other international protocols (OECD 1981,
2009a,b; FDA, 2000, ICH, 1997) that recommend to use young ani-
mals and a duration of the study of 24 months for rodents, repre-
senting the majority of the normal life span of the animals
(Hayes et al., 2011).
Also the reported doses were questioned, since they are
estimates based on assuming constant food consumption of
20 g/day and constant body weights of 400 g for each rat from in
utero life to death. Because during the early growth phase rats
consume more food per gram of body weight, this assumption
may lead to an inaccurate reporting of the dose treatment
(Magnuson and Williams, 2008).
In addition, a high incidence of infectious disease (chronic
inammatory changes) interpreted as lymphomas and/or leuke-
mias acted as a confounding factor; hyperplasia was misdiagnosed
as malignancies. Studies in the 1960s demonstrated that the
progression of chronic pneumonia in rats resulted in lymphoid
neoplasms, and elimination of chronic respiratory disease in rat
colonies reduced the incidence of pulmonary lymphoid neoplasia
to near zero (Roe, 1998). Rats with pulmonary infections developed
lesions in multiple sites earlier than rats free from pulmonary dis-
ease. The ERF aspartame study raised a lively debate on the role of
infections in the appearance of tumours and in particular on
Mycoplasma pulmonis and lymphoma. While some authors support
that the effects observed in the ERF studies on aspartame are
unlikely to be due to infections (Caldwell et al., 2008), on the other
hand there is robust evidence that lesions of M. pulmonis were not
the cause of lymphoma but were plausibly misinterpreted as
tumours (Schoeb et al., 2009; Schoeb and McConnell, 2011).
Again, in the ERF studies tumours generally were unrelated to
aspartame treatment, showed no doseresponse relationships or
were of no relevance for humans; thus, after the evaluation of such
studies EFSA concluded that there was no reason to revise the ADI
of 40 mg/kg b.w. (EFSA 2005, 2006); the U.S. FDA agreed with the
EFSA assessment (FDA, 2007).
In 2010 a carcinogenicity study in mice was published by the
ERF claiming that aspartame induced cancer of the liver and lungs
(Soffritti et al., 2010). EFSA concluded that the study could not be
evaluated based on the information given but noted that the type
of tumours observed in Swiss mice were irrelevant for human risk
assessment and conrmed the previously established ADI for
aspartame (EFSA, 2011a,b).
4. Epidemiological data on cancer
Since the 1970s, when experimental studies on animals re-
ported an excess risk of bladder cancer in rodents treated with ex-
tremely high doses of saccharin (Weihrauch and Diehl, 2004), a
potential role of low-calorie sweeteners in cancer risk has been
widely debated. A few epidemiological studies also found some
relationships between saccharin and bladder cancer risk in humans
(Howe et al., 1977; Bravo et al., 1987; Sturgeon et al., 1994; Andre-
atta et al., 2008), but most and the largest studies found no
association (Hoover and Strasser, 1980; Walker et al., 1982; Elcock
and Morgan, 1993). Moreover, the carcinogenic effect of saccharin
is species-specic, i.e. it is specic to (male) rats administered high
doses of sodium saccharin, following the formation of amorphous
precipitates in (male) rat urine (Cohen, 1995; Capen et al., 1999).
Therefore, the role of saccharin in bladder cancer risk is not consid-
ered in the present report.
With reference to aspartame and other low-calorie sweeteners,
most animal studies have failed to show a carcinogenic activity
(Weihrauch and Diehl, 2004; National Toxicology Program, 2005;
Magnuson et al., 2007). Only two experimental studies on rats
treated with variable doses of aspartame and followed until natu-
ral death found an excess incidence of malignant neoplasms,
including in particular lymphomas and leukemia in females, but
not in males (Soffritti et al., 2006, 2007). As discussed earlier, such
an apparent excess can be explained by the longer duration of
study, as well as by the higher rates of infections of the study ani-
mals (EFSA, 2006). A subsequent long-term carcinogenicity study
on mice from the same group with transplacental exposure to
aspartame found an increased incidence of hepatocellular carcino-
mas and alveolar/bronchiolar carcinomas in males only (Soffritti
et al., 2010).
Below, we review the epidemiological evidence on use of low-
calorie sweeteners and beverages (including mainly aspartame)
from studies on humans published between January 1990 (i.e., a
few years after the use of aspartame became common in several
foodstuffs) and November 15, 2012. Table 1 gives the main charac-
teristics and results of the case-control and cohort studies
considered.
4.1. Brain cancer
On the basis of an ecologic analysis of data from the US National
Cancer Institutes Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results
(SEER), Olney et al. (1996) suggested a direct association between
aspartame and the incidence of brain cancer. However, the study
was later criticized because of uncertainties on brain cancer trends
and intrinsic limitations of ecologic investigations (Ross, 1998). It
was concluded that there was no connection between aspartame
and increased incidence of brain tumours and in 2002 the SCF de-
clared that there was no need to revise the ADI of 40 mg/kg bw fol-
lowing a thorough review of all available safety data (SCF, 2002).
Moreover, the association between aspartame and brain cancer
was not evident in animal studies (Butchko, 1997), and subsequent
case-control studies on brain cancer found no consistent evidence
of an excess risk in relation to aspartame and aspartame-based soft
drinks in humans (Gurney et al., 1997; Bunin et al., 2005; Lim et al.,
2006).
In particular, a case-control study from the USA based on 56
children with brain cancer found no excess risk either for intake
of aspartame from all sources (odds ratio, OR = 1.1, 95% condence
interval, CI, 0.52.6) or for diet drinks (OR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.32.4)
(Gurney et al., 1997). Moreover, this study did not nd any relation
with age at rst consumption, duration, or frequency of consump-
tion for both aspartame from all sources and from diet drinks.
Another US case-control study, which investigated brain cancer
in 315 children in relation to the mothers diet during pregnancy,
also found no association for consumption of diet soda either in
the peri-conception period (OR = 1.3 for P2 soda/day versus <1/
month) or in mid-pregnancy (OR = 1.3, 95% CI 0.82.4) (Bunin
et al., 2005).
With reference to studies on adults, a cohort from the USA (the
NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study), based on more than 500,000
subjects and including 315 cases of glioma, found no association
with aspartame-containing beverages, the adjusted relative risk
M. Marinovich et al. / Food and Chemical Toxicology 60 (2013) 109115 111
Table 1
Findings from observational studies considering the relation between low-calorie sweeteners and cancer risk.
First author, year Country; study
acronym
Type of study Cancer N. cases Type of sweetener Category of
exposure
OR (95% CI)
Ewertz and Gill,
1990
Denmark Case-control Breast 1486 Articial
sweeteners
Yes versus no 0.94 (0.731.20)
Gurney et al., 1997 USA Case-control Brain 56 Aspartame Any intake versus
no
1.1 (0.52.6)
Diet drinks 0.9 (0.32.4)
Bunin et al., 2005 USA Case-control Medulloblastoma
and primitive
neuroectodermal
tumors
315 Diet soda P2 soda/day
versus <1/month
1.3 (0.82.4)
a
1.3 (0.72.5)
b
Lim et al., 2006 USA; NIH-AARP
Diet and Health
Study
Cohort Glioma 315 Aspartame-
containing
beverages
P400 mg/day
versus none
0.73 (0.461.15)
Hematopoietic 1888 P600 mg/day
versus none
0.98 (0.761.27)
Lymphoid 1279 P600 mg/day
versus none
0.95 (0.701.29)
Gallus et al., 2007 Italy Case-control Oral cavity/
pharynx
598 Low-calorie
sweeteners
>2 sachets/day
versus none
0.77 (0.361.64)
Esophagus 304 1.24 (0.542.81)
Colon 1225 0.89 (0.651.21)
Rectum 728 0.80 (0.541.19)
Larynx 460 2.34 (1.204.55)
Breast 2569 0.70 (0.540.91)
Ovary 1031 0.56 (0.380.81)
Prostate 1294 1.19 (0.801.79)
Kidney 767 0.96 (0.641.42)
Bao et al., 2008 USA; NIH-AARP
Diet and Health
Study
Cohort Pancreas 1258 Diet soft drinks Highest quintile
versus never
drinkers
1.11 (0.861.44)
Bosetti et al., 2009 Italy Case-control Stomach 230 Low-calorie
sweeteners
Users versus
nonusers
0.80 (0.451.43)
Pancreas 326 0.62 (0.371.04)
Endometrium 454 0.96 (0.671.40)
Chan et al., 2009 USA Case-control Pancreas 532 Low-calorie cola P1/day versus <1/
month
1.7 (1.22.4)
Low-calorie
caffeine-free cola
P1/day versus <1/
month
1.1 (0.72.0)
Other low-calorie
carbonated
beverages
P1/day versus <1/
month
1.4 (0.82.5)
Schernhammer
et al., 2012
USA; NHS and
HPFS
Cohort NHL 1324 Diet soda P1 serving/day
versus none
1.13 (0.941.34)
1.31 (1.011.72)
c
1.00 (0.781.26)
d
Aspartame Highest quintile
versus lowest
1.16 (0.931.43)
1.64 (1.172.29)
c
0.91 (0.691.20)
d
MM 285 Diet soda P1 serving/day
versus none
1.29 (0.891.89)
2.02 (1.203.40)
c
0.79 (0.451.36)
d
Aspartame Highest quintile
versus lowest
1.03 (0.621.72)
3.36 (1.388.19)
c
1.03 (0.621.72)
d
Leukemia 339 Diet soda P1 serving/day
versus none
1.42 (1.002.02)
1.47 (0.922.35)
c
1.36 (0.802.31)
d
Aspartame Highest quintile
versus lowest
1.23 (0.801.91)
1.56 (0.793.06)
c
1.04 (0.581.85)
d
HPFS: health professionals follow-up study; MM: multiple myeloma; NHL: nonHodgkin lymphoma; NHS: nurses health study.
a
Peri-conception.
b
Mid-pregnancy.
c
Men.
d
Women.
112 M. Marinovich et al. / Food and Chemical Toxicology 60 (2013) 109115
(RR) being 0.73 (95% CI 0.461.15) for P400 mg/day of aspartame
versus no consumption (Lim et al., 2006).
Thus, on the basis of available epidemiologic data there is no
evidence linking aspartame and other low-calorie sweeteners to
the risk of brain cancer, either in children or adults.
4.2. Hematopoietic neoplasms
The possible association between aspartame and hematopoietic
malignancies has been considered in the NIH-AARP Diet and
Health Study cohort (Lim et al., 2006), including 1888 hematopoi-
etic cancers. The overall multivariate RRs of hematopoietic cancers
were 1.01 (95% CI 0.841.21) for 200400 mg/day of aspartame,
1.05 (95% CI 0.851.29) for 400600 mg/day, and 0.98 (95% CI
0.761.27) for P600 mg/day; corresponding RRs of all lymphoid
neoplasms (N = 1279) were 0.98 (95% CI 0.781.22), 1.06 (95% CI
0.821.35), and 0.95 (95% CI 0.701.29), respectively. The RRs for
the highest consumption levels of aspartame were 0.7 (95% CI for
Hodgkins lymphoma, HL), 1.03 (95% CI for multiple myeloma,
MM), and between 0.77 and 1.25 for various types of non-Hodg-
kins lymphoma (NHL) and leukemia, none of these being signi-
cant. Thus, despite the high intake levels considered, no
association was observed between aspartame and hematopoietic
cancers.
On the basis of data from the Nurses Health Study (NHS) and of
the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS), including 1324
NHL, 285 MM, and 339 leukemia, Schernhammer et al. (2012)
found no consistent association between consumption of diet soda
including mainly aspartame containing beverages and NHL or
MM risk. Some excess risks of NHL and MM were reported in
men only, with RR for P1 serving/day of diet soda versus no con-
sumption of 1.31 (95% CI 1.011.72) and 2.02 (95% CI 1.203.40),
respectively for NHL and MM. Similarly, the RR for the highest
quartile of aspartame consumption (P143 mg/day for men and
P129 mg/day for women) versus no consumption were 1.64
(95% CI 1.172.29) for NHL and 3.36 (95% CI 1.388.19) for MM
in men, in the absence, however, of a signicant excess in women
and in the two sexes combined. A signicant excess risk of NHL in
men was reported also for high consumption of regular, sugar-
sweetened sodas (RR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.102.51). For leukemia, there
was no signicant association with diet sodas in sex-stratied
analyses, and the RR for P1 diet sodas per day was 1.42 (95% CI
1.002.02), of borderline signicance, in both sexes combined.
Moreover, no signicant associations with leukemia were observed
in relation to aspartame, both in sex-stratied analyses and in the
two sexes combined. Thus, the observation of some excess risk of
NHL and MM among users of aspartame-containing beverages in
men only in the absence of excess risks for NHL and MM in wo-
men and in both sexes combined and the increased risk of NHL
observed in men also in relation to consumption of regular soda,
weighs against the existence of a real association between diet
soda and NHL.
All taken into-account, the available epidemiological evidence
on low-calorie sweeteners and specically aspartame and
hematopoietic neoplasms does not support the existence of a con-
sistent association.
4.3. Other cancers
With reference to other cancer sites, a case-control study from
Denmark on 1336 women reported no association between use
of articial sweeteners and breast cancer risk (OR = 0.94, 95% CI
0.731.20 for use versus non-use) (Ewertz and Gill, 1990).
In the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study cohort (Bao et al., 2008),
including 1258 cases of pancreatic cancer, no trend in risk was re-
ported for diet soft drinks, with a multivariate RR of 1.11 (95% CI
0.861.44) for the highest quintile of consumption versus never
drinkers.
In a population-based case-control study from Northern Califor-
nia on 532 pancreatic cancer cases (Chan et al., 2009), a signicant
increased risk was reported for low-calorie cola (OR = 1.7, 95% CI
1.22.4, for P1/day versus non-drinkers), particularly in men,
but no signicant associations were reported for low-calorie caf-
feine-free cola (OR = 1.1, 95% CI 0.72.0) or other low-calorie car-
bonated beverages (OR = 1.4, 95% CI 0.82.5).
A study based on an integrated network of case-control studies
conducted in Italy between 1991 and 2008 found no association
between consumption of low-calorie sweeteners and the risk of
various common cancers, including those of the oral cavity and
pharynx, esophagus, colorectum, breast, ovary, prostate, and kid-
ney (Gallus et al., 2007). The ORs for >2 sachets-day of low-calorie
sweeteners versus no consumption were 0.77 (95% CI 0.361.64)
for cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx, 1.24 (95% CI 0.54
2.81) for oesophagus, 0.89 (95% CI 0.651.21) for colon, 0.80 (95%
CI 0.541.19) for rectum, 0.70 (95% CI 0.540.91) for breast (signif-
icantly below unity), 0.56 (95% CI 0.380.81) for ovarian (signi-
cantly below unity), 1.19 (95% CI 0.801.79) for prostate, and 0.96
(95% CI 0.641.42) for kidney cancer. Only for laryngeal cancer a
signicant increase in risk was observed, with ORs of 2.34 (95%
CI 1.204.55) for >2 sachets-day. In the same dataset, a similar
association with laryngeal cancer was, however, found also for su-
gar consumption (OR = 1.46, signicant for P5 versus <1 teaspoon/
day).
A companion study found no relation with low-calorie sweeten-
ers and cancers of the stomach, pancreas and endometrium, adding
further evidence on the absence of an adverse effect of low-calorie
sweeteners on the risk of common neoplasms (Bosetti et al., 2009).
After allowance for various confounding factors, the ORs for ever-
versus non-users of articial or low-calorie sweeteners were 0.80
(95% CI 0.451.43) for gastric, 0.62 (95% CI 0.371.04) for pancre-
atic, and 0.96 (95% CI 0.671.40) for endometrial cancer. Thus,
these data indicate a lack of association between aspartame and
other low-calorie sweeteners and the risk of several common
neoplasms.
5. Epidemiologic data on vascular events
Information on articial (and sugar) sweetened beverage con-
sumption and the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) was pro-
vided from the NHS, including 423 cases of CHD among daily
users of low-calorie beverages and 301 among daily users of su-
gar-sweetened beverages (Fung et al., 2009). The study reported
RRs of 1.07 (95%, CI 0.961.20) for low-calorie beverages and
1.59 (95% CI 0.922.74) for sugar-sweetened beverages.
Data from the Northern Manhattan Study showed an associa-
tion, of borderline signicance, between both diet and sugar-
sweetened soft drinks and combined vascular events (myocardial
infarction, stroke or vascular death combined), with hazard ratios
(HR) for daily consumption of 1.59 (95% CI 0.922.74) for diet soft
beverages and of 1.57 (95% CI 1.052.35) for sugar-sweetened bev-
erages (Gardener et al., 2012). These estimates were based on 15
combined events only for diet soft beverages daily users, and 41
combined events for sugar-sweetened beverages daily users. The
continuous HRs were 1.03 (95% 1.001.07) for diet soft beverages
and 1.02 (95% CI 0.991.04) for sugar-sweetened beverages. Since
diet soft beverages tend to be more frequently used by subjects
who are prone to weight gain to control body weight (Dhingra
et al., 2007), reverse causation may partly or largely account for
the modest and non-signicant association between diet soft bev-
erages and vascular disease observed in this study (Gardener et al.,
2012).
M. Marinovich et al. / Food and Chemical Toxicology 60 (2013) 109115 113
The pooled RR from the two studies (Fung et al., 2009; Gardener
et al., 2012) obtained combining the study estimates by meta-
analytic methods (Greenland, 1987) was 1.19 (95% CI 0.84
1.67) for regular (P1 times per day) consumption of low-calorie
beverages as compared to non-users, and 1.29 (95% CI 1.131.48)
for regular consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages.
Available epidemiologic data thus indicate that, while use of su-
gar-sweetened beverages appears to be related to increased risk of
cardiovascular disease, consumption of low-calorie beverages is
not signicantly related.
6. Epidemiological data on preterm delivery
The issue of a possible association between low-calorie sweet-
eners and the risk of preterm birth was raised in 2010 in a study
from the Danish National Birth Cohort (19962002), including
59,334 women and a total of 2739 cases of preterm births
(<37 weeks) (Halldorsson et al., 2010). The study showed a signif-
icant trend of increasing risk for increasing consumption of arti-
cially sweetened carbonated soft drinks, with a RR of 1.78 (95%
CI 1.192.66) for drinkers of P4 servings/day. The RRs were 1.06
for <1 serving/week, 1.12 for 16 servings/week, 1.27 for 1 serv-
ing/day; however, the signicant RRs for the two highest exposure
categories were based on 51 and 27 cases only, i.e., less than 2%
and 1% of the cases. Moreover, there was an appreciable difference
between carbonated and non-carbonated drinks, with an RR appre-
ciably lower (1.29) among heavy drinkers of articially sweetened
non-carbonated soft drinks (105 cases), and not substantially dif-
ferent from that of heavy drinkers of sugar-sweetened non-carbon-
ated soft drinks (RR = 1.16, 102 cases). No material excess risk was
observed up to 2 drinks per day (RR = 1.09) when carbonated and
non-carbonated low-calorie drinks were combined (La Vecchia,
2013). A possible effect of low-calorie soft drinks on low birth
weight in that study was therefore limited and inconsistent, con-
founded by the two types of drinks (carbonated and non-carbon-
ated) (La Vecchia, 2010), as well as by residual confounding due
to likely differences in baseline characteristics of pregnant women
drinking low-calorie versus sweetened, and carbonated versus
non-carbonated drinks.
In the Norwegian Mother and Child Study cohort (Englund-
gge et al., 2012) including 60,761 women and 3281 (5.4%) pre-
term deliveries (<37 weeks), the RR was 1.01 for <1 serving/week
of articially sweetened beverages versus non-use, 1.09 for 16
servings/week, 1.20 for 1 serving/day, 1.01 for 23 servings/day,
and 1.12 for P4 servings/day. The test for trend was of borderline
signicance (p = 0.053), and there was no linear dose-risk relation,
the RR being 1.01 for both women reporting sporadic use (<1 serv-
ing/week) and for those with regular use (23 drinks per day). A
moderate association between frequency of use of sugar sweet-
ened beverages and the risk of preterm deliveries was also
observed.
When the main ndings of the two studies were pooled (La Vec-
chia, 2013), the RR was 1.25 (95% CI 1.091.43) for P4 servings/
day of low-calorie beverages. However, for lower levels of con-
sumption risk estimates were close to unity and, most important,
similar risk estimates were found for sugar-sweetened beverages
(RR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.061.42 for P4 servings/day).
7. Conclusions
Food additive approval is based on a robust hazard and risk
characterization, leading to the establishment of an ADI and often
a maximum permitted level (MPL) in foods. They must be sub-
jected to a wide range of tests, devised to assess potential risks
to the consumer, before they are allowed in food. Tests assess
how the additive reacts in the body and also look for any toxic ef-
fects at and above the levels the additive is to be used in food. This
includes testing to see if there is any chance of genetic damage or
cancers being caused by the long-term use of the additive. A formal
process for safety evaluation exists at national and international
levels for analysing the test data on food additives, setting the ADIs
and publishing the results.
In Europe, food additives permitted before 20 January 2009
must go through a new risk assessment by EFSA; furthermore, at
any time, the authority can revise its decision on the basis of
new data reporting toxicological effects. In the case of aspartame,
this process was undertaken almost every year, with the produc-
tion of a relevant number of opinions and statements, all conrm-
ing no safety concerns below the established ADI.
With reference to epidemiologic data, evidence on low-calorie
sweeteners and specically aspartame does not support the
existence of a consistent association with hematopoietic neo-
plasms, brain cancer, digestive sites, breast, prostate and several
other neoplasms; similarly, low-calorie sweeteners are not related
to vascular events and preterm deliveries.
Conict of Interest
The authors declare there are no conicts of interest.
Acknowledgement
The work of CB, CLV and SG was conducted with the contribu-
tion of the Italian Association for Cancer Research (Grant No.
10068).
References
Andreatta, M.M., Muoz, S.E., Lantieri, M.J., Eynard, A.R., Navarro, A., 2008. Articial
sweetener consumption and urinary tract tumors in Cordoba. Argentina. Prev.
Med. 47, 136139.
Bao, Y., Stolzenberg-Solomon, R., Jiao, L., Silverman, D.T., Subar, A.F., Park, Y.,
Leitzmann, M.F., Hollenbeck, A., Schatzkin, A., Michaud, D.S., 2008. Added sugar
and sugar-sweetened foods and beverages and the risk of pancreatic cancer in
the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
88, 431440.
Bosetti, C., Gallus, S., Talamini, R., Montella, M., Franceschi, S., Negri, E., La Vecchia,
C., 2009. Articial sweeteners and the risk of gastric, pancreatic, and
endometrial cancers in Italy. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 18, 2235
2238.
Bravo, M.P., Del Rey-Calero, J., Conde, M., 1987. Risk factors of bladder cancer in
Spain. Neoplasma 34, 633637.
Bunin, G.R., Kushi, L.H., Gallagher, P.R., Rorke-Adams, L.B., McBride, M.L., Cnaan, A.,
2005. Maternal diet during pregnancy and its association with
medulloblastoma in children: a childrens oncology group study (United
States). Cancer Causes Control 16, 877891.
Butchko, H.H., 1997. Safety of aspartame. Lancet 349, 1105.
Butchko, H.H., Stargel, W.W., 2001. Aspartame: scientic evaluation in the
postmarketing period. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 34, 221233.
Butchko, H.H., Stargel, W.W., Comer, C.P., Mayhew, D.A., Benninger, C., Blackburn,
G.L., de Sonneville, L.M., Geha, R.S., Hertelendy, Z., Koestner, A., Leon, A.S., Liepa,
G.U., McMartin, K.E., Mendenhall, C.L., Munro, I.C., Novotny, E.J., Renwick, A.G.,
Schiffman, S.S., Schomer, D.L., Shaywitz, B.A., Spiers, P.A., Tephly, T.R., Thomas,
J.A., Trefz, F.K., 2002a. Intake of aspartame versus the Acceptable Daily Intake.
Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 35, S13S16.
Butchko, H.H., Stargel, W.W., Comer, C.P., Mayhew, D.A., Benninger, C., Blackburn,
G.L., de Sonneville, L.M., Geha, R.S., Hertelendy, Z., Koestner, A., Leon, A.S., Liepa,
G.U., McMartin, K.E., Mendenhall, C.L., Munro, I.C., Novotny, E.J., Renwick, A.G.,
Schiffman, S.S., Schomer, D.L., Shaywitz, B.A., Spiers, P.A., Tephly, T.R., Thomas,
J.A., Trefz, F.K., 2002b. Aspartame: review of safety. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.
35, S1S93.
Caldwell, J.C., Jinot, J., DeVoney, D., Gift, J.S., 2008. Evaluation of evidence for
infection as a mode of action for induction of rat lymphoma. Environ. Mol.
Mutagen. 49 (2), 155164.
Capen, C.C., Dybing, E., Rice, J.M., Wilbourn, J.D., 1999. Species differences in thyroid,
kidney and urinary bladder carcinogenesis. IARC Scientic Publ. No. 147. Lyon,
France: International Agency for Research on Cancer.
Chan, J.M., Wang, F., Holly, E.A., 2009. Sweets, sweetened beverages, and risk of
pancreatic cancer in a large population-based case-control study. Cancer Causes
Control 20, 835846.
Cohen, S.M., 1995. Human relevance of animal carcinogenicity studies. Regul.
Toxicol. Pharmacol. 21, 7580, discussion 8176.
114 M. Marinovich et al. / Food and Chemical Toxicology 60 (2013) 109115
Dhingra, R., Sullivan, L., Jacques, P.F., Wang, T.J., Fox, C.S., Meigs, J.B., DAgostino, R.B.,
Gaziano, J.M., Vasan, R.S., 2007. Soft drink consumption and risk of developing
cardiometabolic risk factors and the metabolic syndrome in middle-aged adults
in the community. Circulation 116, 480488.
EFSA, 2005. Opinion of the Scientic Committee on a request from EFSA related to a
harmonised approach for risk assessment of substances which are both
genotoxic and carcinogenic. EFSA J. 282, 131.
EFSA, 2006. Opinion of the scientic panel AFC related to new long-term
carcinogenicity study on aspartame. EFSA J. 356, 144.
EFSA, 2009. Guidance of the Scientic Committee on a request from EFSA on the use
of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment. EFSA J. 1150, 172.
EFSA, 2011a. Statement on two recent scientic articles on the safety of articial
sweeteners. EFSA J. 9, 1996.
EFSA, 2011b. EFSA Statement on the scientic evaluation of two studies related to
the safety of articial sweeteners. EFSA J. 9, 2089.
EFSA, 2011c. Overview of the procedures currently used at EFSA for the assessment
of dietary exposure to different chemical substances. EFSA J. 9 (12), 2490.
EFSA, 2012. Guidance for submission for food additive evaluations. EFSA J. 10 (7),
60. http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.276.
EFSA, 2013. DRAFT Scientic Opinion on the re-evaluation of aspartame (E 951) as a
food additive. <http://www.efsa.europa.eu/it/consultationsclosed/call/
130108.pdf>.
Elcock, M., Morgan, R.W., 1993. Update on articial sweeteners and bladder cancer.
Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 17, 3543.
Englund-gge, L., Brantster, A.L., Haugen, M., Sengpiel, V., Khatibi, A., Myhre, R.,
Myking, S., Meltzer, H.M., Kacerovsky, M., Nilsen, R.M., Jacobsson, B., 2012.
Association between intake of articially sweetened and sugar-sweetened
beverages and preterm delivery: a large prospective cohort study. Am. J. Clin.
Nutr. 96, 552559.
Ewertz, M., Gill, C., 1990. Dietary factors and breast-cancer risk in Denmark. Int. J.
Cancer. 46, 779784.
FDA, 1984. Food additives permitted for direct addition to food for human
consumption: aspartame. Food and Drug Administration. Federal Register 49,
6672.
FDA, 2000. Toxicological principles for the safety assessment of food ingredients:
FDA Redbook 2000: Section IV.C.6. Carcinogenicity studies with rodents.
January 2006, p. 21. <http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/>.
FDA, 2007. FDA Statement on European Aspartame Study. <http://
www.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/fpaspar2.html> (accessed 12.01.08).
Fry, J., 1999. The world market for intense sweeteners. World Rev. Nutr. Diet. 85,
201211.
Fung, T.T., Malik, V., Rexrode, K.M., Manson, J.E., Willett, W.C., Hu, F.B., 2009.
Sweetened beverage consumption and risk of coronary heart disease in women.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 89, 10371042.
Gallus, S., Scotti, L., Negri, E., Talamini, R., Franceschi, S., Montella, M., Giacosa, A.,
Dal Maso, L., La Vecchia, C., 2007. Articial sweeteners and cancer risk in a
network of case-control studies. Ann. Oncol. 18, 4044.
Gardener, H., Rundek, T., Markert, M., Wright, C.B., Elkind, M.S., Sacco, R.L., 2012.
Diet soft drink consumption is associated with an increased risk of vascular
events in the Northern Manhattan study. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 27, 11201126.
Greenland, S., 1987. Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature.
Epidemiol. Rev. 9, 130.
Gurney, J.G., Pogoda, J.M., Holly, E.A., Hecht, S.S., Preston-Martin, S., 1997.
Aspartame consumption in relation to childhood brain tumor risk: results
from a case-control study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 89, 10721074.
Halldorsson, T., 2010. Intake of articially sweetened soft drinks and risk of preterm
delivery. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 92 (author reply 15401542).
Halldorsson, T.I., Strom, M., Petersen, S.B., Olsen, S.F., 2010. Intake of articially
sweetened soft drinks and risk of preterm delivery: a prospective cohort study
in 59,334 Danish pregnant women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 92, 626633.
Hayes, A.W., Dayan, A.D., Hall, W.C., Kodell, R.L., Williams, G.M., Waddell, W.D.,
2011. A review of mammalian carcinogenicity study design and potential
effects of alternate procedures on the safety evaluation of food ingredients.
Regulatory Toxicol. Pharmacol. 59, 142175.
Hoover, R.N., Strasser, P.H., 1980. Articial sweeteners and human bladder cancer.
Preliminary results. Lancet 1, 837840.
Howe, G.R., Burch, J.D., Miller, A.B., Morrison, B., Gordon, P., Weldon, L., Chambers,
L.W., Fodor, G., Winsor, G.M., 1977. Articial sweeteners and human bladder
cancer. Lancet 2, 578581.
ICH (International Conference for Harmonization), 1997. Testing for carcinogenicity
of pharmaceuticals. Guideline S1B. US Fed. Reg. 63: 8983; EU: CPMP/ICH/299/
95. <http://www.ich.org/cache/compo/502-272-1.html#S1B>.
JECFA, 1980. Aspartame; Evaluation of certain food additives. Joint FAO/WHO
Expert Committee on Food Additives. Technical Report Series 653. World Health
Organization, Geneva.
Jeffrey, A.M., Williams, G.M., 2000. Lack of DNA-damaging activity of ve non-
nutritive sweeteners in the rat hepatocyte/DNA repair assay. Food Chem.
Toxicol. 38, 335338.
La Vecchia, C., 2010. Intake of articially sweetened soft drinks and risk of preterm
delivery. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 92, 1540.
La Vecchia, C., 2013. Low-calorie sweeteners and the risk of preterm delivery:
results from two studies and a meta-analysis. J. Fam. Plan. Reprod. Health Care
39, 1213.
Lim, U., Subar, A.F., Mouw, T., Hartge, P., Morton, L.M., Stolzenberg-Solomon, R.,
Campbell, D., Hollenbeck, A.R., Schatzkin, A., et al., 2006. Consumption of
aspartame-containing beverages and incidence of hematopoietic and brain
malignancies. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 15, 16541659.
Magnuson, B., Williams, G.M., 2008. Carcinogenicity of aspartame in rats not
proven. Environ. Health Perspect. 116 (6), A239A240.
Magnuson, B.A., Burdock, G.A., Doull, J., Kroes, R.M., Marsh, G.M., Pariza, M.W.,
Spencer, P.S., Waddell, W.J., Walker, R., Williams, G.M., 2007. Aspartame: a
safety evaluation based on current use levels, regulations, and toxicological and
epidemiological studies. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 37, 629727.
NTP (US National Toxicology Program), 2005. NTP report on the toxicology studies
of aspartame (CAS No. 2283947-0) in genetically modied (FVB Tg.AC
hemizygous) and B6.129-Cdkn2atm1Rdp (N2) decient mice and
carcinogenicity studies of aspartame in genetically modied [B6.129-
Trp53tm1Brd (N5) haploinsufcient] mice (feed studies). National Toxicology
Program Genetically Modied Model, Report. Oct, pp. 1222.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 1981.
OECDGuideline for Testing of Chemicals. Guideline 451: Carcinogenicity
Studies, Adopted May 12, 1991.
OECD, 2009a. OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals. Test Guideline 451:
Carcinogenicity Studies. <http://lysander.sourceoecd.org/vl=1999285/cl=28/
nw=1/rpsv/cw/vhosts/oecdjournals/1607310x/v1n4/contp1-1.htm>.
OECD, 2009b. Draft Guidance Document on the Design and Conduct of Chronic
Toxicity and Carcinogenicity Studies, Series on Testing and Assessment No. 116.
<http://www.oecd.org/document/55/
0,3343,en_2649_34377_2349687_1_1_1_1,00.html>.
Olney, J.W., Farber, N.B., Spitznagel, E., Robins, L.N., 1996. Increasing brain tumor
rates: is there a link to aspartame? J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 55, 11151123.
Ranney, R.E., Mares, S.E., Schroeder, R.E., Hutsell, T.C., Radzialowski, F.M., 1975. The
phenylalanine and tyrosine content of maternal and fetal body uids from
rabbits fed aspartame. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 32, 339346.
Renczogullari, E., Tyl, B.A., Topaktas , M., Ila, H.B., Kayraldiz, A., Arslan, M., Diler,
S.B., 2004. Genotoxicity of aspartame. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 27 (3), 257268.
Roe, F.J., 1998. A brief history of the use of laboratory animals for the prediction of
carcinogenic risk for man with a note on needs for the future. Exp. Toxicol.
Pathol. 50 (46), 271276.
Ross, J.A., 1998. Brain tumors and articial sweeteners? A lesson on not getting
soured on epidemiology. Med. Pediatr. Oncol. 30, 78.
Sasaki, Y.F., Kawaguchi, S., Kamaya, A., Ohshita, M., Kabasawa, K., Iwama, K.,
Taniguchi, K., Tsuda, S., 2002. The comet assay with 8 mouse organs: results
with 39 currently used food additives. Mutat. Res. 519, 103119.
SCF (Scientic Committee on Food), 1985. Sweeteners. Reports of the Scientic
Committee for Food (Sixteenth Series), EUR 10210 EN, Commission of the
European Communities, Luxembourg.
SCF (Scientic Committee on Food), 1989. Sweeteners. Reports of the Scientic
Committee for Food (Twenty-rst Series), EUR 11617 EN, Commission of the
European Communities, Luxembourg.
SCF (Scientic Committee on Food), 1997. Minutes of the 107th Meeting of the
Scientic Committee for Food, held on 1213 June 1997 in Brussels. <http://
europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/oldcomm7/out13_en.html>.
SCF (Scientic Committee on Food), 2002. Opinion of the Scientic Committee on
Food: Update on the Safety of Aspartame (expressed on 4 December 2002).
<http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scf/out155_en.pdf>.
Schernhammer, E.S., Bertrand, K.A., Birmann, B.M., Sampson, L., Willett, W.C.,
Feskanich, D., 2012. Consumption of articial sweetener- and sugar-containing
soda and risk of lymphoma and leukemia in men and women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
96, 14191428.
Schoeb, T.R., McConnell, E.E., 2011. Commentary. Further comments on mycoplasma
pulmonis and lymphoma in bioassays of rats. Vet. Pathol. 48, 420426.
Schoeb, T.R., McConnell, E.E., Juliana, M.M., Davis, J.K., Davidson, M.K., Lindsey, J.R.,
2009. Mycoplasma pulmonis and lymphoma in bioassays in rats. Vet. Pathol. 46,
952959.
Soffritti, M., Belpoggi, F., Degli Esposti, D., Lambertini, L., Tibaldi, E., Rigano, A., 2006.
First experimental demonstration of the multipotential carcinogenic effects of
aspartame administered in the feed to Sprague-Dawley rats. Environ. Health
Perspect. 114, 379385.
Soffritti, M., Belpoggi, F., Tibaldi, E., Esposti, D.D., Lauriola, M., 2007. Life-span
exposure to low doses of aspartame beginning during prenatal life increases
cancer effects in rats. Environ. Health Perspect. 115, 12931297.
Soffritti, M., Belpoggi, F., Manservigi, M., Tibaldi, E., Lauriola, M., Falcioni, L., Bua, L.,
2010. Aspartame administered in feed, beginning prenatally through life span,
induces cancers of the liver and lung in male Swiss mice. Am. J. Ind. Med. 53,
11971206.
Stegink, L.D., Filer Jr., L.J., Bell, E.F., Ziegler, E.E., Tephly, T.R., Krause, W.L., 1990.
Repeated ingestion of aspartame-sweetened beverages: further observations in
individuals heterozygous for phenylketonuria. Metabolism 39 (10), 10761081.
Stegink, L.D., Lindgren, S.D., Brummel, M.C., Stumbo, P.J., Wolraich, M.L., 1995.
Erythrocyte L-aspartyl-L-phenylalanine hydrolase activity and plasma
phenylalanine and aspartate concentrations in children consuming diets high
in aspartame. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 62 (6), 12061211.
Sturgeon, S.R., Hartge, P., Silverman, D.T., Kantor, A.F., Linehan, W.M., Lynch, C.,
Hoover, R.N., 1994. Associations between bladder cancer risk factors and tumor
stage and grade at diagnosis. Epidemiology 5, 218225.
Walker, A.M., Dreyer, N.A., Friedlander, E., Loughlin, J., Rothman, K.J., Kohn, H.I.,
1982. An independent analysis of the National Cancer Institute study on non-
nutritive sweeteners and bladder cancer. Am. J. Public. Health 72, 376381.
Weihrauch, M.R., Diehl, V., 2004. Articial sweetenersdo they bear a carcinogenic
risk? Ann. Oncol. 15, 14601465.
M. Marinovich et al. / Food and Chemical Toxicology 60 (2013) 109115 115