The International Journal of Human Resource Management
The International Journal of Human Resource Management
9
4
1
)
f
o
r
O
r
g
a
n
i
s
a
t
i
o
n
P
C
t
e
r
m
s
.
M
e
a
n
S
D
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
.
T
e
n
u
r
e
1
.
1
9
2
.
0
0
2
.
O
c
c
u
p
a
t
i
o
n
0
.
4
3
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
2
3
.
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
g
e
n
d
e
r
0
.
7
1
0
.
4
6
0
.
0
6
0
.
1
8
*
*
*
4
.
T
i
m
i
n
g
0
.
2
1
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
7
*
2
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
3
5
.
B
e
n
e
t
s
4
.
0
0
0
.
7
7
0
.
0
7
*
0
.
2
3
*
*
*
0
.
1
1
*
*
2
0
.
0
5
6
.
T
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
4
.
3
0
0
.
6
9
2
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
2
2
0
.
0
6
2
0
.
0
7
*
0
.
2
1
*
*
*
7
.
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p
4
.
3
9
0
.
6
7
0
.
0
4
0
.
1
4
*
*
*
2
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
5
0
.
3
1
*
*
*
0
.
3
9
*
*
*
8
.
E
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
s
4
.
0
8
0
.
7
1
0
.
0
6
0
.
0
3
2
0
.
0
5
2
0
.
0
1
0
.
2
7
*
*
*
0
.
2
5
*
*
*
0
.
3
7
*
*
*
9
.
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
4
.
5
8
0
.
5
3
0
.
0
1
2
0
.
0
4
2
0
.
0
2
2
0
.
0
3
0
.
2
2
*
*
*
0
.
3
3
*
*
*
0
.
3
9
*
*
*
0
.
4
0
*
*
*
1
0
.
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
4
.
2
7
0
.
6
7
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
4
2
0
.
0
9
*
*
2
0
.
0
1
0
.
3
1
*
*
*
0
.
4
3
*
*
*
0
.
3
4
*
*
*
0
.
3
7
*
*
*
0
.
4
2
*
*
*
N
o
t
e
:
*
p
,
0
.
0
5
,
*
*
p
,
0
.
0
1
,
*
*
*
p
,
0
.
0
0
1
.
The International Journal of Human Resource Management 4367
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
e
e
d
s
]
a
t
1
0
:
4
9
3
0
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3
T
a
b
l
e
2
.
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
v
e
s
t
a
t
i
s
t
i
c
s
a
n
d
c
o
r
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
N
9
4
1
)
f
o
r
E
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
P
C
t
e
r
m
s
.
M
e
a
n
S
D
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
.
T
e
n
u
r
e
1
.
1
9
2
.
0
0
2
.
O
c
c
u
p
a
t
i
o
n
0
.
4
3
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
2
3
.
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
g
e
n
d
e
r
0
.
7
1
0
.
4
6
0
.
0
6
0
.
1
8
*
*
*
4
.
T
i
m
i
n
g
0
.
2
1
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
7
*
2
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
2
5
.
V
o
l
u
n
t
e
e
r
3
.
5
9
0
.
9
3
0
.
0
6
0
.
0
7
*
0
.
0
1
0
.
0
1
6
.
N
e
w
s
k
i
l
l
s
4
.
2
5
0
.
6
3
2
0
.
0
1
0
.
0
8
*
2
0
.
0
4
2
0
.
0
2
0
.
1
8
*
*
*
7
.
R
e
l
i
a
b
l
e
4
.
7
2
0
.
5
2
2
0
.
0
2
0
.
0
7
*
0
.
0
1
2
0
.
0
3
0
.
1
0
*
*
0
.
2
9
*
*
*
8
.
H
o
n
e
s
t
4
.
8
6
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
1
0
.
0
4
2
0
.
0
4
2
0
.
0
1
0
.
1
1
*
*
0
.
2
5
*
*
*
0
.
4
7
*
*
*
9
.
E
x
t
r
a
h
o
u
r
s
4
.
1
8
0
.
7
6
2
0
.
0
2
0
.
1
6
*
*
*
0
.
1
0
*
*
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
7
*
*
*
0
.
2
1
*
*
*
0
.
2
4
*
*
*
0
.
1
6
*
*
*
1
0
.
C
o
m
p
l
y
4
.
7
1
0
.
5
0
0
.
0
3
2
0
.
0
2
2
0
.
0
9
*
*
0
.
0
0
0
.
1
1
*
*
0
.
2
6
*
*
*
0
.
3
2
*
*
*
0
.
3
9
*
*
*
0
.
1
9
*
*
*
1
1
.
N
o
p
l
a
n
s
2
.
7
9
1
.
1
0
0
.
0
7
2
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
9
*
*
0
.
0
7
*
0
.
0
9
*
*
0
.
0
1
2
0
.
0
1
0
.
0
8
*
0
.
1
6
*
*
*
0
.
0
4
1
2
.
S
e
e
k
T
&
D
4
.
0
2
0
.
6
9
0
.
0
4
0
.
1
7
*
*
*
2
0
.
0
4
2
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
9
*
*
0
.
3
9
*
*
*
0
.
1
6
*
*
*
0
.
1
1
*
*
0
.
1
9
*
*
*
0
.
1
4
*
*
*
0
.
0
2
1
3
.
C
o
n
t
a
c
t
s
3
.
7
9
0
.
8
3
0
.
0
1
0
.
2
0
*
*
*
2
0
.
0
1
2
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
9
*
*
0
.
2
6
*
*
*
0
.
1
5
*
*
*
0
.
1
0
*
*
0
.
2
0
*
*
*
0
.
0
8
*
0
.
0
6
0
.
5
4
*
*
*
1
4
.
C
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
4
.
0
6
0
.
7
4
0
.
0
5
0
.
1
7
*
*
*
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
2
0
.
2
3
*
*
*
0
.
3
7
*
*
*
0
.
1
8
*
*
*
0
.
1
6
*
*
*
0
.
3
4
*
*
*
0
.
1
4
*
*
*
0
.
1
1
*
*
*
0
.
4
5
*
*
*
0
.
4
7
*
*
*
N
o
t
e
:
*
p
,
0
.
0
5
,
*
*
p
,
0
.
0
1
,
*
*
*
p
,
0
.
0
0
1
.
I. Metz et al. 4368
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
e
e
d
s
]
a
t
1
0
:
4
9
3
0
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3
inuenced the effect of crisis timing (Pillais 0.023, F(6, 599) 2.34, p 0.031; see
Table 4) for the reported organisational obligation to give resources (Provide resources that
enable this employee todohis or her work). Post-GFC, managers report a higher obligationto
give resources to female (mean 4.72) than to male (mean 4.47) employees; no such
gender difference was evident for pre-GFC samples (see Table 5).
Affected industries
Table 4 shows a main effect for the covariate (employee occupation) (Pillais 0.057,
F(6, 313) 2.98, p , 0.01), such that the obligation to provide an attractive benets
package was higher for employees in Professional/Manager occupations (mean 4.17)
than for employees in lower level occupations (mean 3.82; see means in Table 5). Table 4
also shows a main effect of crisis timing (Pillais 0.054, F(6, 313) 2.97, p , 0.01).
Managers in affected industries reported lower organisational obligations to their employees
for all six items post-GFC (regardless of gender). In particular, training, employee interests
and development opportunities were signicantly higher for pre-GFC than post-GFC
samples (see Table 5 for the pre-GFC and post-GFC means of these three obligations).
In summary, changes in Organisation PC terms support Hypothesis 1 but not
Hypothesis 2. Hypothesis 1 proposed that the deterioration in PC terms would be more
pronounced in affected industries than in non-affected industries. Our results show that
pre- and post-GFC differences in the Organisation PC terms varied by industry.
Specically, the lowering of Organisation PC obligations towards employees post-GFC
occurred in organisations operating in industries affected by the GFC. In contrast, for
organisations operating in non-affected industries, there was a trend post-GFC towards
increasing (rather than decreasing) one obligation: to provide resources that enabled
employees to do their work. Therefore, Hypothesis 1 was supported for the set of
Table 3. Multivariate tests for Organisation PC items.
Pillais value F Sig
Occupation 0.062 10.06 0.000
Crisis timing (CT) 0.018 2.76 0.012
Employee gender (gender) 0.016 2.42 0.025
Industry 0.015 2.26 0.036
CT Gender 0.002 0.334 0.919
CT Industry 0.016 2.48 0.022
Gender Industry 0.014 2.23 0.038
CT Gender Industry 0.017 2.60 0.017
Note: Hypothesis degrees of freedom and error degrees of freedom were (6, 918).
Table 4. Multivariate tests for Organisation PC items for affected and non-affected industries.
Non-affected industries (6, 599)
a
Affected industries (6, 599)
a
Pillais value F Sig Pillais value F Sig
Occupation 0.067 7.18 0.000 0.054 2.98 0.008
Crisis timing (CT) 0.015 1.49 0.180 0.054 2.97 0.008
Employee gender (Gender) 0.025 2.52 0.020 0.038 2.08 0.055
CT Gender 0.023 2.34 0.031 0.018 0.98 0.439
a
Note: Hypothesis df, Error df.
The International Journal of Human Resource Management 4369
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
e
e
d
s
]
a
t
1
0
:
4
9
3
0
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3
T
a
b
l
e
5
.
D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
i
n
m
e
a
n
s
a
n
d
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
d
e
v
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
a
n
d
t
e
s
t
s
o
f
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
e
f
f
e
c
t
s
.
t
-
t
e
s
t
s
f
o
r
e
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
m
e
a
n
s
M
e
a
n
1
M
e
a
n
2
S
D
1
S
D
2
t
S
i
g
.
N
o
n
-
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
e
s
O
c
c
u
p
a
t
i
o
n
B
e
n
e
t
s
p
a
c
k
a
g
e
3
.
8
4
(
O
t
h
e
r
)
4
.
2
2
(
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
)
0
.
8
2
4
(
O
t
h
e
r
)
0
.
6
3
0
(
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
)
2
5
.
9
9
8
0
.
0
0
0
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p
4
.
2
8
(
O
t
h
e
r
)
4
.
4
9
(
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
)
0
.
7
1
1
(
O
t
h
e
r
)
0
.
5
7
4
(
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
)
2
3
.
6
4
6
0
.
0
0
0
E
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
g
e
n
d
e
r
B
e
n
e
t
s
p
a
c
k
a
g
e
3
.
8
8
(
F
)
4
.
1
2
(
M
)
0
.
7
8
9
(
F
)
0
.
7
4
3
(
M
)
2
3
.
7
0
2
0
.
0
0
0
C
r
i
s
i
s
t
i
m
i
n
g
G
e
n
d
e
r
G
i
v
e
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
(
P
r
e
)
4
.
5
2
(
F
)
4
.
5
8
(
M
)
0
.
5
4
8
(
F
)
0
.
5
6
0
(
M
)
2
1
.
0
8
1
0
.
2
8
0
G
i
v
e
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
(
P
o
s
t
)
4
.
7
2
(
F
)
4
.
4
7
(
M
)
0
.
4
5
4
(
F
)
0
.
5
3
7
(
M
)
2
2
.
7
1
0
.
0
0
8
A
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
e
s
O
c
c
u
p
a
t
i
o
n
B
e
n
e
t
s
p
a
c
k
a
g
e
3
.
8
2
(
O
t
h
e
r
)
4
.
1
7
(
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
)
0
.
8
2
8
(
O
t
h
e
r
)
0
.
6
2
1
(
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
)
2
4
.
3
0
8
0
.
0
0
0
C
r
i
s
i
s
t
i
m
i
n
g
T
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
4
.
3
7
(
p
r
e
)
4
.
0
8
(
p
o
s
t
)
0
.
7
0
1
(
p
r
e
)
0
.
7
2
6
(
p
o
s
t
)
3
.
0
3
6
0
.
0
0
3
E
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
s
4
.
1
0
(
p
r
e
)
3
.
8
7
(
p
o
s
t
)
0
.
7
2
9
(
p
r
e
)
0
.
6
4
0
(
p
o
s
t
)
2
.
4
9
1
0
.
0
1
3
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
p
p
s
4
.
3
3
(
p
r
e
)
4
.
0
8
(
p
o
s
t
)
0
.
6
1
9
(
p
r
e
)
0
.
7
6
2
(
p
o
s
t
)
2
.
9
5
0
0
.
0
0
3
I. Metz et al. 4370
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
e
e
d
s
]
a
t
1
0
:
4
9
3
0
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3
Organisation PC terms, because a deterioration in PC terms occurred in affected industries
but not in non-affected industries.
Hypothesis 2 then proposed that changes in the terms of the PC from pre- to post-GFC
would likely reect changes in the terms of the PCfor female employees rather than for male
employees. We found one three-way interaction showing that managers in non-affected
industries reported an increasing obligation post-GFC to provide resources to women that
enabled themto do their work. Thus, our three-way interaction did not support Hypothesis 2,
because the one Organisation PCtermthat changed post-GFCfor women (and not for men)
reected an improvement rather than a deterioration of the PC for women.
Employee PC changes
Another initial 2 2 2 MANCOVA was conducted to assess whether crisis timing,
employee gender and industry affected managers expectations of what the employees were
obliged to provide their organisations. As can be seen fromTable 6, there was no three-way
interaction between crisis timing, employee gender, and industry. There was, however, a
main effect for employee occupation (Pillais 0.062, F(10, 898) 5.96, p , 0.001). As
can be seen in Table 7, respondents were more likely to expect employees in Professional/
Manager occupations than employees in lower level occupations to develop new skills,
seek training and development, build contacts (inside and outside the organisation to
enhance career potential) and accept high standards (i.e., accept increasingly challenging
performance standards).
Table 6 also shows a main effect of employee gender (Pillais 0.042, F(10,
898) 3.96, p , 0.001), such that managers reported higher expectations of men than of
women in terms of work extra hours, not work elsewhere and accept high standards
(see means in Table 7).
Further, Table 6 shows that a two-way interaction between crisis timing and industry
emerged (Pillais 0.032, F(10, 898) 2.97, p 0.001). Hence, two univariate
ANOVAs were conducted to examine the effect of crisis timing on Employee PC items
for affected and non-affected industries separately. Table 7 presents the signicantly
different means in employee obligations for each industry before and after the GFC.
Non-affected industries
For the non-affected industries, managers were more likely to expect post-GFC (mean
3.13) than pre-GFC (mean 2.74) that employees would make no plans to work elsewhere.
Table 6. Multivariate tests for Employee PC items.
Pillais value F Sig
Occupation 0.062 5.96 0.000
Crisis timing (CT) 0.009 0.82 0.610
Employee gender (Gender) 0.042 3.96 0.000
Industry 0.018 1.64 0.090
CT Gender 0.004 0.396 0.949
CT Industry 0.032 2.97 0.001
Gender Industry 0.015 1.38 0.183
CT Gender Industry 0.014 1.25 0.253
Note: Hypothesis degrees of freedom and error degrees of freedom were (10, 898).
The International Journal of Human Resource Management 4371
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
e
e
d
s
]
a
t
1
0
:
4
9
3
0
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3
T
a
b
l
e
7
.
D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
i
n
m
e
a
n
s
a
n
d
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
d
e
v
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
a
n
d
t
e
s
t
s
o
f
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
e
f
f
e
c
t
s
.
t
-
t
e
s
t
s
f
o
r
e
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
m
e
a
n
s
M
e
a
n
1
M
e
a
n
2
S
D
1
S
D
2
F
S
i
g
.
O
c
c
u
p
a
t
i
o
n
N
e
w
s
k
i
l
l
s
4
.
1
3
(
O
t
h
e
r
)
4
.
3
2
(
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
)
0
.
6
8
4
(
O
t
h
e
r
)
0
.
6
1
4
(
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
)
2
2
.
7
3
2
0
.
0
0
7
S
e
e
k
T
&
D
3
.
8
9
(
O
t
h
e
r
)
4
.
1
7
(
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
)
0
.
7
1
2
(
O
t
h
e
r
)
0
.
6
1
8
(
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
)
2
3
.
7
3
2
0
.
0
0
0
B
u
i
l
d
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
s
3
.
6
4
(
O
t
h
e
r
)
4
.
0
1
(
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
)
0
.
8
8
0
(
O
t
h
e
r
)
0
.
6
9
9
(
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
)
2
4
.
1
4
3
0
.
0
0
0
H
i
g
h
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
3
.
8
6
(
O
t
h
e
r
)
4
.
2
0
(
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
)
0
.
8
9
8
(
O
t
h
e
r
)
0
.
7
3
8
(
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
)
2
3
.
7
1
3
0
.
0
0
0
E
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
g
e
n
d
e
r
W
o
r
k
e
x
t
r
a
h
o
u
r
s
4
.
1
0
(
F
)
4
.
3
8
(
M
)
0
.
7
4
7
(
F
)
0
.
6
6
2
(
M
)
2
3
.
4
7
5
0
.
0
0
1
N
o
t
w
o
r
k
e
l
s
e
w
h
e
r
e
2
.
5
4
(
F
)
2
.
9
2
(
M
)
1
.
0
3
9
(
F
)
1
.
1
1
8
(
M
)
2
3
.
2
0
0
0
.
0
0
2
H
i
g
h
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
3
.
9
3
(
F
)
4
.
1
6
(
M
)
0
.
9
2
0
(
F
)
0
.
7
0
8
(
M
)
2
2
.
4
8
5
0
.
0
1
3
N
o
n
-
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
e
s
C
r
i
s
i
s
t
i
m
i
n
g
N
o
t
w
o
r
k
e
l
s
e
w
h
e
r
e
2
.
7
5
(
P
r
e
)
3
.
1
4
(
P
o
s
t
)
1
.
0
7
1
(
P
r
e
)
1
.
0
7
3
(
P
o
s
t
)
2
3
.
5
9
6
0
.
0
0
0
A
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
e
s
C
r
i
s
i
s
t
i
m
i
n
g
S
e
e
k
T
&
D
4
.
1
1
(
P
r
e
)
3
.
7
9
(
P
o
s
t
)
0
.
6
4
4
(
P
r
e
)
0
.
7
3
6
(
P
o
s
t
)
3
.
6
9
8
0
.
0
0
0
B
u
i
l
d
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
s
3
.
9
3
(
P
r
e
)
3
.
5
1
(
P
o
s
t
)
0
.
7
7
6
(
P
r
e
)
0
.
8
4
1
(
P
o
s
t
)
3
.
9
9
2
0
.
0
0
0
I. Metz et al. 4372
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
e
e
d
s
]
a
t
1
0
:
4
9
3
0
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3
Affected industries
Managers in affected industries had a lower expectation post-GFC that employees would
actively seek opportunities for training and development (Seek T&D; mean [pre] 4.11;
mean [post] 3.79), and build contacts to enhance career potential (Build contacts; mean
[pre] 3.93; mean [post] 3.51).
In summary, pre- and post-GFC differences in some of the Employee PC terms varied
by industry, but not by employee gender. Specically, the expectations of respondents in
non-affected industries changed in one instance: respondents were more likely post-GFC
than pre-GFC to expect their employees not to make plans to work elsewhere. In
comparison, respondents in affected industries reported that their employees were less
obliged post-GFC to actively seek opportunities for training and development, and to build
contacts inside and outside the organisation to enhance career potential. The lowering of
these two employee PC terms is likely to reduce the employees self and career
development, which might be detrimental to the employee and to the employer during an
economic upturn. Therefore, Hypothesis 1 was partly supported, because deterioration in
Employee PC terms was more pronounced in affected than in non-affected industries.
However, Hypothesis 2 was not supported (for Employee PC terms), because there were
no gender differences in PC changes from pre- to post-GFC.
Discussion
The literatures on PCs, gender discrimination and the impact of economic crisis on
industries indicate that organisations (through their managers) might have reduced the
focus on the employeeorganisation relationship to manage the GFC of 2008. Such
refocus would have resulted in the deterioration of at least some of the PC terms. Any
deterioration, however, is expected to be more pronounced in industries affected by the
recent GFC than in those not affected by it. In addition, any deterioration of PC terms is
expected to be more pronounced for female than male employees, because pressing
economic concerns would have provided sufcient business-related justications for
some managers to subtly discriminate against women. Thus, this study examines if any
changes in PC terms after the start of the GFC are contingent on industry and employee
gender.
After controlling for employee occupation, we found that men are more likely to get
attractive benets than women regardless of the state of the global economy. This nding
aligns with evidence of a persistent gender pay gap in Australia (Goldman Sachs JBWere
2009) as elsewhere (OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development]
2006). In return for providing more attractive benets packages to men, immediate
managers perceive male employees to be more obliged than female employees to work
extra hours if needed to get the job done, make no plans to work anywhere else and accept
increasingly challenging performance standards. On the basis of social role theory, men
are the primary income earners and women the primary care givers (Eagly 1987). Thus,
decision makers might rationalise that men have higher nancial needs and can give more
time to work than women (Pfeffer and Ross 1982). Nevertheless, these gender differences
in immediate managers understandings of the PC terms might constitute subtle forms of
discrimination that can have negative consequences for women (Ekehammar et al. 2000).
For example, by perceiving female employees as less obliged than their male counterparts
to accept increasingly challenging performance standards, immediate managers might
provide fewer or less challenging work opportunities to women than to men. Yet,
challenging developmental experiences facilitate womens career advancement (Metz and
The International Journal of Human Resource Management 4373
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
e
e
d
s
]
a
t
1
0
:
4
9
3
0
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3
Tharenou 2001). In summary, the reported differences in managers understandings of the
PC terms can lead to behaviour that advantages men and disadvantages women.
Some of the terms of the PC deteriorated after the start of the GFC, but primarily for
employees working in affected industries. Managers working in affected industries
perceive lower obligations to provide employees training and development opportunities,
and make decisions with the employees interests in mind. Further, immediate managers in
affected industries perceive that employees are less obliged than before to actively seek
opportunities for training and development, and to build contacts inside and outside the
organisation to enhance career potential. We conclude that managers in organisations
affected by an economic downturn are likely to change aspects of the employee
organisation relationship that can hinder the employees professional development in the
short- and medium-term. This change in PC terms reects an approach to the management
of the employeeorganisation relationship that is contingent on economic conditions. This
contingent approach can have the unintended effect of slowing an organisations nancial
recovery during a subsequent economic upturn. For example, employees dissatised with
deteriorating training and professional development opportunities in their current
organisations might seek better opportunities elsewhere, as soon as the economy and the
labour market improve. Unfortunately for current employers, that might be precisely when
they need their employees loyalty most.
In contrast, managers in non-affected industries simply have a higher expectation post-
GFC that their employees will make no plans to work anywhere else. It is possible that
immediate managers in non-affected industries expect higher loyalty from their employees
in return for maintaining other PC terms during tough economic times.
Only one PC term improved for women post-GFC: the reported (organisation)
obligation to provide resources that enable the employee to do his/her work. This gender
difference (in favour of women) occurs only in industries not affected by the GFC. This
result is surprising because, instead of reecting sexism, it appears to reect favouritism.
In line with the rationale that the employeeorganisation relationship is dynamic and
affected by contextual factors (e.g., Rousseau 1995; Shore et al. 2004), in this instance the
context presented an opportunity for organisations operating in non-affected industries to
positively inuence the employeeorganisation relationship for female employees. Media
coverage in 20082009 on persistent gender inequities in Australia may have prompted
decision-makers in non-affected industries to take corrective action in the form of
providing resources to women to do their jobs. Examples of media topics in the months
leading up to the second data collection were the persistent under-representation of women
in leadership (e.g., Fox 2008) and the enduring gender pay gap (e.g., Healy 2008). Gender
inequities in the workplace are unlikely to be addressed by merely providing more
resources to women. Future research is needed to determine if this nding reects genuine
efforts to reduce gender inequities or simply the generous mood of comparatively
resource-rich organisations.
In conclusion, the GFC changed managers understandings of the terms of the
employment relationship only in particular instances. This selective inuence might be
partly explained by the mild impact of the GFC on Australian businesses relative to
businesses in some other developed countries (e.g., Ireland; Roche et al. 2011), the fact
that any impact was further attenuated by government interventions to stimulate the
Australian economy (Garnaut 2009; Forster 2010), the erce competition for talent (AIG
2010), and a renewed interest in gender inequity issues in Australia (e.g., Goldman Sachs
JBWere 2009). In particular, the three-way interaction found in this study indicates that the
last contextual factor (renewed interest in gender inequity issues) can trump economic
I. Metz et al. 4374
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
e
e
d
s
]
a
t
1
0
:
4
9
3
0
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3
conditions for non-affected industries. Organisations that are comparatively resource-rich
during an economic downturn might want (or want to be seen) to redress gender inequities
by providing a greater proportion of their resources to their female employees
(a traditionally disadvantaged group) than to their male employees.
Practical implications
Economic downturns can place a strain on the employeeorganisation relationship,
particularly for affected organisations. However, such strain can be managed. Lessons
from countries severely affected by the GFC (e.g., Ireland) suggest that the most important
human resource management practice in a recession is open, honest and intensive
communication (from the organisation to employees) to manage expectations effectively
(Roche et al. 2011). Managers are key in the communication of economic pressures to
employees (Roche et al. 2011) and, if necessary, in re-negotiating the terms of the PC
(Conway and Briner 2005).
Further, gender diversity in organisations in general (Herring 2009), and in leadership
in particular (Werner, Devillard and Sancier-Sultan 2010), has been associated with
improved nancial performance. Therefore, organisations will benet from providing
female employees with equally generous employment terms and conditions as their male
colleagues to avoid loss of female talent. Differential treatment on the basis of gender has
led female employees to take legal action against their employers (e.g., Federal Court of
Australia 2002). Organisations can avoid legal proceedings, attract and retain female
talent and improve nancial performance by raising awareness of subtle and covert forms
of discrimination, such as differential perceptions of the employment exchange
relationship for male and female employees.
Studys contributions and limitations
This study makes a number of contributions. First, as we collected data on the PC before
and after the start of the recent GFC, this study provides a unique contribution to our
understanding of the dynamic nature of the PC without having to rely on informants post-
hoc evaluations of how employment relationships were affected by economic conditions.
Second, this study contributes to our understanding of the dynamic nature of the PC from
the employers perspective, an under-studied viewpoint. Specically, this study sheds
light on how managers in affected and in non-affected industries differentially manage the
employeeorganisation relationship in an economic downturn. Third, this study informs
how employee gender can inuence the managers perception of that relationship. Thus,
this study starts to ll a gap in our current understanding of how the managers perspective
of PCs might be inuenced by contextual factors, such as the health of the economy, and
by personal factors, such as the employees gender.
Despite its contributions, this study has two main limitations. First, as the study was
conducted in Australia (a country that so far has been relatively unaffected by the GFC), its
ndings are likely to underestimate the potential impact of economic downturns on the PC.
The upside, however, is that its ndings can be generalized to countries similarly, or more,
affected by the GFC. Second, this study focused on understanding the inuence of
changing economic conditions on the PC, but only from an employers perspective. We
acknowledge that the employees perspective is also needed to fully understand the impact
of context and employee gender on the PC. Nevertheless, under tough economic
conditions and a general reduction in suitable job vacancies, we would expect immediate
managers to take the lead in PC changes.
The International Journal of Human Resource Management 4375
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
e
e
d
s
]
a
t
1
0
:
4
9
3
0
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3
Conclusion
Overall, the results of this study show that the terms of the employment relationship
deteriorated in Australia only for those employees working in industries affected by the
GFC. Further, this deterioration applied to only half of the perceived organisation
obligations to the employee, and to one-fth of the perceived employee obligations to the
organisation measured in this study. The relative stability of the PC terms in Australia pre-
and post-GFC is likely to be the result of two important contextual factors: the ongoing
shortage of skilled labour in Australia and the mild impact of the GFC on Australian
businesses compared to elsewhere.
Despite the ongoing shortage of skilled labour in Australia, however, some gender
differences in the terms of the PC exist independent of the economy. This nding suggests
that, in Australia, immediate managers engage in subtle forms of gender discrimination.
Considering that the labour shortage in Australia is reportedly the highest business priority
for CEOs (e.g., AIG 2010) and the continued trend in the increase in womens
participation in the labour force (ABS 2009), managers should redress the gender
inequalities in the PC to fully utilise Australias hidden resource: female talent
(Goldman Sachs JBWere 2009). Managers in industries not affected by the recent GFC
appear to be using their relative resource-rich advantage to lead this redress.
Acknowledgement
This research was supported by a grant from the Australian Research Council (Discovery Project
0664752). We are grateful for assistance provided by Mark Crosby and Simon Moss.
References
ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2008a), Employment and Earnings, Public Sector, Australia,
200708, (Catalogue No. 6248.0), Canberra: ABS.
ABS (2008b), Australian Industry, (Catalogue No. 8155.0), Canberra: ABS.
ABS (2009), Labour Force Australia, June 2009, (Catalogue No. 6202.0), Canberra: ABS.
ABS (2010a), Australian National Accounts: National Income, Expenditure and Product, June
2010: Table 6, www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/DetailsPage/5206.0Jun%202010?Oen
Document
ABS (2010b), Australian Social Trends, June 2010, (Catalogue No. 4102.0), Canberra: ABS.
ABS (2010c), Australian Industry, (Catalogue No. 8155.0), Canberra: ABS.
ABS (2010d), Australian Industry, (Catalogue No. 8155.0), Canberra: ABS.
ABS (2010e), Employment and Earnings, Public Sector, Australia, 200910, (Catalogue No.
6248.0), Canberra: ABS.
ABS (2011), Labour Force Australia, Detailed, (Catalogue No. 6291.0), Canberra: ABS.
AIG (Australian Industry Group) (2008), Skilling the Existing Workforce, www.aigroup.com.au/
policy/reports
AIG (2010), Australian Industry Group and Deloitte National CEO Survey: Skills Shortages:
A High-Risk Business, www.aigroup.com.au/policy/reports
Atkinson, C., and Cuthbert, P. (2006), Does One Size Fit All? International Journal of Manpower,
27, 647665.
Barreto, M., and Ellemers, N. (2005), The Perils of Political Correctness, Social Psychology
Quarterly, 68, 7588.
Baruch, Y., and Holtom, B. (2008), Survey Response Rate Levels and Trends in Organizational
Research, Human Relations, 61, 11391160.
Becker, T.E. (2005), Potential Problems in the Statistical Control of Variables in Organizational
Research, Organizational Research Methods, 8, 274289.
Bennington, L., and Wein, R. (2000), Anti-Discrimination Legislation in Australia: Fair, Effective,
Efcient or Irrelevant? International Journal of Manpower, 21, 2133.
I. Metz et al. 4376
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
e
e
d
s
]
a
t
1
0
:
4
9
3
0
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3
Brief, A.P., Dietz, J., Cohen, R.R., Pugh, S.D., and Vaslow, J.B. (2000), Just Doing Business,
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 7297.
Briner, R. (2010, 29 July), Deal Breakers, People Management, HR column.
Cappelli, P., and Sherer, P.D. (1990), Assessing Worker Attitudes Under a Two-Tier Wage Plan,
Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43, 225243.
Cascio, W.F. (1993), Downsizing, Academy of Management Executive, 7, 95104.
Chen, H.-F., and Chiu, Y.H. (2009), The Inuence of Psychological Contracts on the Adjustment
and Organizational Commitment Among Expatriates, International Journal of Manpower, 30,
797814.
Conway, N., and Briner, R.B. (2005), Understanding Psychological Contracts at Work, Oxford, NY:
Oxford University Press.
Coyle-Shapiro, J., and Kessler, I. (2000), Consequences of the Psychological Contract for the
Employment Relationship, Journal of Management Studies, 37, 903930.
Crosby, M. (2010), Business As Usual? Voyeur Magazine, 107, 102104.
Dabos, G.E., and Rousseau, D.M. (2004), Mutuality and Reciprocity in the Psychological Contracts
of Employees and Employers, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 5272.
Duehr, E.E., and Bono, J.E. (2006), Men, Women and Managers: Are Stereotypes Finally
Changing? Personnel Psychology, 59, 815846.
Dvorak, P., and Thurm, S. (2009), Slump Prods Firms to Seek New Compact With Workers,
http://www.grahall.com/newsfeeds/slump-prods-rms-to-seek-new-compact-with-workers/
(accessed 22 October 2010).
Eagly, A.H. (1987), Sex Differences in Social Behavior, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eagly, A.H., and Karau, S.J. (2002), Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Toward Female Leaders,
Psychological Review, 109, 573598.
EOWA (Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Agency) (2010), Australian Census of
Women in Leadership, Canberra: Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Agency.
Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., and Araya, T. (2000), Developments and Validations of Swedish
Classical and Modern Sexism Scales, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 307314.
Federal Court of Australia (2002), Thomson v. Orica Australia Pty Ltd, www.globaljusticecenter.
net/casebank/bycountry/australia.html
Forster, J. (2010), The Global Financial Crisis, Melbourne: John Wiley & Sons Australia.
Fox, C. (2008), Why Gender Trumps Talent, Australian Financial Review, 12 November, 19.
Garnaut, R. (2009), The Great Crash of 2008, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Goldman Sachs JBWere (2009), Australias Hidden Resource: The Economic Case for Increasing
Female Participation, Melbourne: Goldman Sachs JBWere.
Greenhouse, S. (2008), Starting Out Means a Steeper Climb, The Nation, 12 May, 2224.
Haase, R.F., and Ellis, V. (1987), Multivariate Analysis of Variance, Journal of Counselling
Psychology, 34, 404413.
Healy, M. (2008), Reality Puts Paid to Equality, Herald Sun, 1.
Herring, C. (2009), Does Diversity Pay? American Sociological Review, 74, 208224.
Herriot, P., Manning, W., and Kidd, J.M. (1997), The Content of the Psychological Contract,
British Journal of Management, 8, 151162.
Hopkins, S.M., and Weathington, B.L. (2006), The Relationship Between Justice Perceptions,
Trust, and Employee Attitudes in a Downsized Organization, The Journal of Psychology, 140,
477498.
Lee, C., Liu, J., Rousseau, D.M., Hui, C., and Chen, Z.X. (2011), Inducements, Contributions, and
Fulllment in New Employment Psychological Contracts, Human Resource Management, 50,
201226.
Lim, J.Y. (2000), The Effects of the East Asian Crisis on the Employment of Women and Men:
The Philippine Case, World Development, 28, 12851306.
Lim, G.C., Chua, C.L., Claus, E., and Tsiaplias, S. (2009), Review of the Australian Economy
20082009, The Australian Economic Review, 42, 111.
Livanos, I., Yalkin, C ., and Nunez, I. (2009), Gender Employment Discrimination: Greece and the
United Kingdom, International Journal of Manpower, 30, 815834.
Mellahi, K., and Wilkinson, A. (2010), Slash and Burn or Nip and Tuck? The International Journal
of Human Resource Management, 21, 22912305.
Metz, I., and Tharenou, P. (2001), Womens Career Advancement, Gender and Organization
Management, 26, 312342.
The International Journal of Human Resource Management 4377
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
e
e
d
s
]
a
t
1
0
:
4
9
3
0
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3
Nichols, M. (2009), Job Loss the No. 1 Global Concern, Survey Shows, www.global.factiva.com.
ezproxy.mbs.edu/ha/default.aspx
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development) (2006), Women and Men in
OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.
Perry, E.L., and Kulik, C.T. (2008), The Devolution of HR to the Line, The International Journal
of Human Resource Management, 19, 262273.
Pfeffer, J.P., and Ross, J. (1982), The Effects of Marriage and a Working Wife on Occupational and
Wage Attainment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 6680.
Powell, G. (2011), Women and Men in Management, Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Reserve Bank of Australia (2010), Statement of Monetary Policy: May 2010, www.rba.gov.au/
publications/smp/2010/may/pdf/0510.pdf
Roche, W.K., Teague, P., Coughlan, A., and Fahy, M. (2011), Human Resources in Recession,
Final Report, Labour Relations Commission, Dublin.
Rousseau, D.M. (1995), Psychological Contracts in Organizations, London: Sage.
Rousseau, D.M., and Greller, M.M. (1994), Human Resource Practices: Administrative Contract
Makers, Human Resource Management, 33, 385401.
Shore, L.M., Tetrick, L.E., Taylor, M.S., and Coyle-Shapiro, J.A.M. (2004), The Employee
Organization Relationship: A Timely Concept in a Period of Transition, Research in Personnel
and Human Resources Management, 23, 291370.
Somaya, D., and Williamson, I. (2008), Rethinking the War for Talent, MIT Sloan Management
Review, 49, 2934.
Stevens, J. (1996), Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Swim, J.K., Aikin, K.J., Hall, W.S., and Hunter, B.A. (1995), Sexism and Racism, Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199214.
Tekleab, A.G., and Taylor, M.S. (2003), Arent There Two Parties in an Employment
Relationship? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 585608.
Thomson, J. (2009), Business Cuts Back on Training and Hours in Bid to Hang Onto Staff, www.
smartcompany.com.au/managing-people/20092910-business-cuts-back-on-training-and-hours-
in-bid-to-hang-onto-staff.html
Turnley, W.H., and Feldman, D.C. (1998), Psychological Contract Violations During Corporate
Restructuring, Human Resource Management, 37, 7183.
Turnley, W.H., and Feldman, D.C. (2000), The Impact of Psychological Contract Violations on
Managers Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect Behaviors, Administrative Science Quarterly, 34,
521539.
U.S. Supreme Court (2007), Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co, http://www.glin.gov/view.
action?glinID194274
Watkins, M.B., Kaplan, S., Brief, A., Shull, A., Dietz, J., Manseld, M.T., and Cohen, R. (2006),
Does it Pay to be a Sexist? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 524537.
Weinfurt, K.P. (1995), Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics, in Reading and
Understanding Multivariate Statistics, eds. L.G. Grimm and P.R. Yarnold, Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association, pp. 245276.
Werner, C., Devillard, S., and Sancier-Sultan, S. (2010), McKinsey Global Survey Results: Moving
Women to the Top, Report, McKinsey & Company.
Zagelmeyer (2010), Company-Level Employment Relations During the Global Financial Crisis,
in Industrial Relations in Europe Conference, pp. 123.
I. Metz et al. 4378
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
e
e
d
s
]
a
t
1
0
:
4
9
3
0
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3
Appendix A: Organisation PC and Employee PC obligations
Organisation psychological contract obligations
To what extent are you and your organisation obliged to provide each of the following to this
employee? (Bolded words were used in Table 1)
An attractive benets package
Training
Leadership
Make decisions with this employees interests in mind
Provide resources that enable this employee to do his or her work
Provide developmental opportunities within the organisation
Employee psychological contract obligations
To what extent do you feel that this employee is obliged to provide each of the following to you and
your organisation? (Bolded words were used in Table 2)
Volunteer to do tasks that fall outside his/her job description
Develop new skills as needed
Perform his/her jobs in a reliable manner
Deal honestly with the organisation
Work extra hours if needed to get the job done
Follow company policies and procedures (comply)
Make no plans to work anywhere else
Actively seek opportunities for training and development (Seek T&D)
Build contacts inside and outside the organisation to enhance career potential
Accept increasingly challenging performance standards (Challenge)
All responses were given on a scale ranging from 1, strongly disagree, to 5, strongly agree.
Appendix B. Comparison of sample and population distributions in 2007 and 2009, by
organisation size, sector and industry group.
% Employed
2007 Population
(%)
2007 Sample
(%)
2009 Population
(%)
2009 Sample
(%)
Small to medium
organisations
73 75 71 86
Large organisations 27 25 29 14
Public sector 19 17 16 11
Private sector 81 83 84 89
Unaffected industries 68 66 69 63
Affected industries 32 34 31 37
Sources: ABS (2008a,b, 2010d,e)
The International Journal of Human Resource Management 4379
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
e
e
d
s
]
a
t
1
0
:
4
9
3
0
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3