Anomalistic psychology

1
Anomalistic psychology
In psychology, anomalistic psychology is the study of human behaviour and experience connected with what is
often called the paranormal, without the assumption that there is anything paranormal involved.
Overview
Henry Maudsley (18351918) an
early researcher in anomalistic
psychology.
According to anomalistic psychology, paranormal phenomena have naturalistic
explanations resulting from psychological and physical factors which have
sometimes given the impression of paranormal activity to some people, in fact,
where there have been none.
[1]
The phrase "Anomalistic Psychology" was a term
first suggested by the psychologists Leonard Zusne and Warren Jones in their
book Anomalistic Psychology: A Study of Magical Thinking (1989) which
systematically treats phenomena of human consciousness and behaviors that may
appear to violate the laws of nature when they actually do not.
[2]
Anomalistic psychology has a long history. The physician John Ferriar wrote An
Essay Towards a Theory of Apparitions in 1813 in which he argued that sightings
of ghosts were the result of optical illusions. Later the French physician
Alexandre Jacques Franois Brire de Boismont published On Hallucinations:
Or, the Rational History of Apparitions, Dreams, Ecstasy, Magnetism, and
Somnambulism in 1845 in which he claimed sightings of ghosts were the result
of hallucinations.
[3]
William Benjamin Carpenter in his book Mesmerism,
Spiritualism, Etc: Historically and Scientifically Considered (1877) wrote Spiritualist practices could be explained
by fraud, delusion, hypnotism and suggestion.
[4]
The British psychiatrist Henry Maudsley in Natural Causes and
Supernatural Seemings (1886) wrote that so-called supernatural experiences could be explained in terms of disorders
of the mind and were simply "malobservations and misinterpretations of nature".
[5]
Lionel Weatherly (a psychiatrist) and John Nevil Maskelyne (a magician) wrote The Supernatural? (1891) which
offered rational explanations for apparitions, paranormal and religious experiences and Spiritualism.
[6]
In his book
Christian Science, Medicine, and Occultism (1902) Albert Moll wrote that practices such as Christian Science,
Spiritualism and occultism were the result of fraud and hypnotic suggestion. Moll argued that suggestion explained
the cures of Christian Science, as well as the apparently supernatural rapport between magnetisers and their
somnambulists. He wrote that fraud and hypnotism could explain mediumistic phenomena.
[7]
Karl Jaspers in his
book General Psychopathology (1913) stated that all paranormal phenomena are manifestations of psychiatric
symptoms.
[8]
Other scientists who studied anomalistic psychology include Millais Culpin, Joseph Jastrow, Charles Arthur Mercier
and Ivor Lloyd Tuckett. The Canadian psychologist Graham Reed published a major work on the subject The
Psychology of Anomalous Experience (1972).
[9]
Various psychological publications have explained in detail how reported paranormal phenomena such as
mediumship, precognition, out-of-body experiences and psychics can be explained by psychological factors without
recourse to the supernatural. Researchers involved with anomalistic psychology try to provide plausible
non-paranormal accounts, supported by empirical evidence, of how psychological and physical factors might
combine to give the impression of paranormal activity when there had been none. Apart from deception or
self-deception such explanations might involve cognitive biases, anomalous psychological states, dissociative states,
hallucinations, personality factors, developmental issues and the nature of memory.
[10]
Anomalistic psychology
2
Chris French founder of the Anomalistic Psychology
Research Unit.
The psychologist David Marks wrote that paranormal
phenomena can be explained by magical thinking, mental
imagery, subjective validation, coincidence, hidden causes,
and fraud.
[11]
Robert Baker wrote that many paranormal
phenomena can be explained via psychological effects such as
hallucinations, sleep paralysis and hidden memories, a
phenomenon in which experiences that originally make little
conscious impression are filed away in the brain to be
suddenly remembered later in an altered form.
[12]
Massimo Polidoro a professor of Anomalistic Psychology at
the University of Milano Bicocca, Italy teaches the course
"Scientific Method, Pseudoscience and Anomalistic
Psychology".
[13]
Another notable researcher is the British
psychologist Chris French who set up the Anomalistic Psychology Research Unit (APRU) in the Department of
Psychology at Goldsmiths, University of London.
[14]
Hauntings
A psychological study (Klemperer, 1992) of ghosts wrote that visions of ghosts may arise from hypnagogic
hallucinations ("waking dreams" which are experienced in the transitional states to and from sleep).
[15]
In an
experiment (Lange and Houran, 1997) 22 subjects visited five areas of a performance theatre and were asked to
notice the environment. Half of the subjects were informed that the locations they were in were haunted, whilst the
other half were told that the building was simply under renovation. The subjects' perceptions in both groups were
recorded to an experiential questionnaire which contained 10 subscales related to psychological and physiological
perceptions. The results showed more intense perceptual experiences on nine of the ten subscales from the group that
was told the building was haunted which has indicated that demand characteristics alone can stimulate paranormal
experiences.
[16]
A study (Lange and Houran, 1998) suggested that poltergeist experiences are delusions "resulting from the affective
and cognitive dynamics of percipients' interpretation of ambiguous stimuli".
[17]
Two experiments into alleged hauntings (Wiseman et al. 2003) discovered that the data supported the "notion that
people consistently report unusual experiences in haunted areas because of environmental factors, which may differ
across locations." Some of these factors included "the variance of local magnetic fields, size of location and lighting
level stimuli of which witnesses may not be consciously aware".
[18]
Mediumship
Research and empirical evidence from psychology for over a hundred years has revealed that where there is not
fraud, mediumship and Spiritualistic practices can be explained by psychological factors. Trance mediumship which
is claimed by the Spiritualists to be caused by discarnate spirits speaking through the medium have been proven in
cases to be alternate personalities from the medium's subconscious mind.
[19]
The medium may obtain information about their sitters by secretly eavesdropping on sitter's conversations or
searching telephone directories, the internet and newspapers before the sittings.
[20]
Mediums are known for
employing a technique called cold reading and obtain information from the sitter's behavior, clothing, posture, and
jewellery.
[21][22]
In a series of fake seance experiments (Wiseman et al. 2003) paranormal believers and disbelievers were suggested
by an actor that a table was levitating when, in fact, it remained stationary. After the seance, approximately one third
of the participants incorrectly reported that the table had moved. The results showed a greater percentage of believers
Anomalistic psychology
3
reporting that the table had moved. In another experiment the believers had also reported that a handbell had moved
when it had remained stationary and expressed their belief that the fake seances contained genuine paranormal
phenomena. The experiments strongly supported the notion that in the seance room, believers are more suggestible
than disbelievers for suggestions that are consistent with their belief in paranormal phenomena.
[23]
An experiment (O'Keeffe and Wiseman, 2005) involving 5 mediums found no evidence to support the notion that the
mediums under controlled conditions were able to demonstrate paranormal or mediumistic ability.
[24]
Paranormal healing
A study in the British Medical Journal (Rose, 1954) investigated spiritual healing, therapeutic touch and faith
healing. In a hundred cases that was investigated no single case revealed that the healer's intervention alone resulted
in any improvement or cure of a measurable organic disability.
[25]
A trial was carried out by a group of scientists (Beutler, 1988) to see whether three treatment groups, paranormal
laying on of hands, paranormal healing at a distance and no paranormal healing to test if they might reduce blood
pressure. The data did not reveal any paranormal effects as no significant differences between the three treatment
groups were found. The results concluded that the fall in blood pressure in all three of the groups was caused by the
psychosocial approach and the placebo effect of the trial itself.
[26]
One form of paranormal healing known as psychic surgery has been discovered to be the result of sleight of hand
tricks. Psychic surgeons pretend to reach into the patient's body but the skin is never punctured, there are no scars
and the blood is released from packets hidden in the surgeon's hands.
[27]
Psychokinesis
Cognitive biases have been found in some cases of psychokinesis. In an investigation of 380 studies a group of
psychologists (Bsch et al. 2006) have written an meta-analysis on the subject. In their paper they wrote "statistical
significance of the overall database provides no directive as to whether the phenomenon is genuine or not" and came
to the conclusion that "publication bias appears to be the easiest and most encompassing explanation for the primary
findings of the meta-analysis."
[28]
According to Richard Wiseman there are a number of ways for faking psychokinetic metal bending (PKMB) these
include switching straight objects for pre-bent duplicates, the concealed application of force, and secretly inducing
metallic fractures. Research has also suggested that (PKMB) effects can be created by verbal suggestion. On this
subject (Harris, 1985) wrote:

If you are doing a really convincing job, then you should be able to put a bent key on the table and comment, Look, it is still bending, and
have your spectators really believe that it is. This may sound the height of boldness; however, the effect is astounding and combined with
suggestion, it does work.
[29]

In an experimental study (Wiseman and Greening, 2005) two groups of participants were shown a videotape in
which a fake psychic placed a bent key on a table. Participants in the first group heard the fake psychic suggest that
the key was continuing to bend when it had remained stationary, whilst those in the second group did not. The results
revealed that participants from the first group reported significantly more movement of the key than the second
group. The findings were replicated in another study. The experiments had demonstrated that "testimony for PKMB
after effects can be created by verbal suggestion, and therefore the testimony from individuals who have observed
allegedly genuine demonstrations of such effects should not be seen as strong evidence in support of the
paranormal".
[30]
Anomalistic psychology
4
Remote viewing
Research has suggested that in cases the participants of remote viewing experiments are influenced by subjective
validation, a process through which correspondences are perceived between stimuli that are in fact associated purely
randomly. Sensory cues have also occurred in remote viewing experiments.
[31]
Telepathy
Research has discovered that in some cases telepathy can be explained by a covariation bias. In an experiment
(Schienle et al. 1996) 22 believers and 20 skeptics were asked to judge the covariation between transmitted symbols
and the corresponding feedback given by a receiver. According to the results the believers overestimated the number
of successful transmissions whilst the skeptics made accurate hit judgments.
[32]
The results from another telepathy
experiment involving 48 undergraduate college students (Rudski, 2002) were explained by hindsight and
confirmation biases.
[33]
Relationship with parapsychology
Anomalistic psychology is sometimes described as a sub-field of parapsychology, however, anomalistic psychology
rejects the paranormal claims of parapsychology. According to Chris French:

The difference between anomalistic psychology and parapsychology is in terms of the aims of what each discipline is about. Parapsychologists
typically are actually searching for evidence to prove the reality of paranormal forces, to prove they really do exist. So the starting assumption
is that paranormal things do happen, whereas anomalistic psychologists tend to start from the position that paranormal forces probably don't
exist and that therefore we should be looking for other kinds of explanations, in particular the psychological explanations for those experiences
that people typically label as paranormal.
[34]

Anomalistic psychology has been reported to be on the rise. It is now offered as an option on many psychology
degree programmes and is also an option on the A2 psychology syllabus in the UK.
[35]
References
[1] Nicola Holt, Christine Simmonds-Moore, David Luke, Christopher French. (2012). Anomalistic Psychology (Palgrave Insights in
Psychology). Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0230301504
[2] Leonard Zusne, Warren H. Jones. (1989). Anomalistic Psychology: A Study of Magical Thinking. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0805805086
[3] Shane McCorristine. (2010). Spectres of the Self: Thinking About Ghosts and Ghost-Seeing in England, 17501920. Cambridge University
Press. pp. 4456. ISBN 978-0521747967
[4] William Benjamin Carpenter. (1877). Mesmerism, Spiritualism, Etc: Historically and Scientifically Considered. Cambridge University Press.
ISBN 978-1108027397
[5] Ivan Leudar, Philip Thomas. (2000). Voices of Reason, Voices of Insanity: Studies of Verbal Hallucinations. Routledge. pp. 106107. ISBN
978-0415147873
[6] Lionel Weatherly, John Nevil Maskelyne. (2011). The Supernatural? (Cambridge Library Collection Spiritualism and Esoteric
Knowledge). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1108029193
[7] Wolffram, Heather. (2012). Trick, Manipulation and Farce: Albert Molls Critique of Occultism (http:/ / www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/ pmc/
articles/ PMC3381525/ ). Medical History 56(2): 277295.
[8] Karl Jaspers. (1913). General Psychopathology. Baltimore. MD: Johns Hopkins. ISBN 978-0801858154
[9] Graham Reed. (1972). The Psychology of Anomalous Experience: A Cognitive Approach. Hutchinson University Library. ISBN
978-0091132408
[10] What is Anomalistic Psychology? (http:/ / www.gold. ac. uk/ apru/ what/ )
[11] Marks, David. (1988). The psychology of paranormal beliefs. Experientia, 44, 332337.
[12] Robert Baker. (1996). Hidden Memories: Voices and Visions from Within. Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1573920940
[13] Biography of Massimo Polidoro (http:/ / www. massimopolidoro. com/ english-version/ bio-notes)
[14] Anomalistic psychology: What is it and why bother? by Chris French (http:/ / www. psychologytoday. com/ blog/ weird-science/ 200909/
anomalistic-psychology-what-is-it-and-why-bother)
[15] Klemperer, Frances. (1992). Ghosts, Visions, And Voices: Sometimes Simply Perceptual Mistakes (http:/ / pubmedcentralcanada. ca/ pmcc/
articles/ PMC1884722/ pdf/ bmj00105-0010.pdf). BMJ: British Medical Journal , Vol. 305, No. 6868 (Dec. 1926), pp. 15181519.
Anomalistic psychology
5
[16] Lange, R., and J. Houran. (1997). Context-induced paranormal experiences: Support for Houran and Lange's model of haunting
phenomena. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 14551458.
[17] Lange, R., Houran, J. (1998). Delusions of the paranormal: A haunting question of perception. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 186
(10), 637645.
[18] Wiseman, R., C. Watt, P. Stevens, et al. (2003). An investigation into alleged hauntings (http:/ / www. richardwiseman. com/ resources/
BJP-hauntings. pdf). British Journal of Psychology, 94: 195211.
[19] Millais Culpin. (1920). Spiritualism and the New Psychology, an Explanation of Spiritualist Phenomena and Beliefs in Terms of Modern
Knowledge. Kennelly Press. ISBN 978-1446056516
[20] Ian Rowland. (1998). The Full Facts Book of Cold Reading. London, England: Ian Roland. ISBN 978-0955847608
[21] Brad Clark (2002). Spiritualism. pp. 220226 in Michael Shermer. The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience. ABC-CLIO. ISBN
978-1576076538
[22] Jonathan Smith. (2009). Pseudoscience and Extraordinary Claims of the Paranormal: A Critical Thinker's Toolkit. Wiley-Blackwell. pp.
141241. ISBN 978-1405181228
[23] Wiseman, R., Greening, E., and Smith, M. (2003). Belief in the paranormal and suggestion in the seance room (https:/ / uhra. herts. ac. uk/
dspace/ bitstream/ 2299/ 2278/ 1/ 103252.pdf). British Journal of Psychology, 94 (3): 285297.
[24] O'Keeffe, C. & Wiseman, R. (2005). Testing alleged mediumship: Methods and results (http:/ / www. richardwiseman. com/ resources/
MediumBJP.pdf). British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 96, 165179.
[25] Louis Rose. (1954). Some Aspects Of Paranormal Healing. British Medical Journal, Vol. 2, No. 4900, pp. 13291332.
[26] Beutler, J., Attevelt, J., Schouten, S., Faber, J., Mees, E., & Geijskes, G. (1988). Paranormal healing and hypertension. British Medical
Journal, 296, 14911494.
[27] Randy Moore. (1992). Debunking the Paranormal: We Should Teach Critical Thinking as a Necessity for Living, Not Just as a Tool for
Science. The American Biology Teacher, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 49.
[28] Bsch, H., Steinkamp, F., Boller, E. (2006). Examining Psychokinesis: The Interaction of Human Intention with Random Number
Generators. A Meta-Analysis Examining Psychokinesis: The Interaction of Human Intention with. Random Number Generators. A
Meta-Analysis (http:/ / www. ebo. de/ publikationen/ pk_ma. pdf). Psychological Bulletin, 132 (4): 497523.
[29] Ben Harris. (1985). Gellerism Revealed: The Psychology and Methodology Behind the Geller Effect. Calgary: Micky Hades International.
ISBN 978-0919230927
[30] Wiseman, R. & Greening, E. (2005). It's still bending': verbal suggestion and alleged psychokinetic ability (http:/ / www. richardwiseman.
com/ resources/ BJP-key.pdf). British Journal of Psychology, 96, 115127.
[31] Marks, David. (1981). Sensory cues invalidate remote viewing experiments. Nature 292: 177.
[32] Schienle, A., Vaitl, D., and Stark, R. (1996). Covariation bias and paranormal belief. Psychological Reports, 78, 291305.
[33] Rudski, J. M. (2002). Hindsight and confirmation biases in an exercise in telepathy. Psychological Reports, 91, 899906.
[34] Interview with Chris French on Anomalistic psychology (http:/ / www. videojug. com/ interview/ anomalistic-psychology-2)
[35] The rise of anomalistic psychology and the fall of parapsychology? (http:/ / blogs. nature. com/ soapboxscience/ 2011/ 12/ 19/
the-rise-of-anomalistic-psychology--and-the-fall-of-parapsychology)
Further reading
Gustav Jahoda. (1974). The Psychology of Superstition. Jason Aronson, Inc. Publisher. ISBN 978-0876681855
David Marks. (2000). The Psychology of the Psychic. Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1573927987
Andrew Neher. (2011). Paranormal and Transcendental Experience: A Psychological Examination. Dover
Publications. ISBN 978-0486261676
John Schumaker. (1990). Wings of Illusion: The Origin, Nature and Future of Paranormal Belief. Prometheus
Books. ISBN 978-0879756246
External links
What is Anomalistic Psychology? (http:/ / www. goldsmiths. ac. uk/ apru/ what. php)
Prof Chris French explains anomalistic psychology on Pulse Project Expert Explanations. (http:/ / www.
pulse-project. org/ node/ 388)
Article Sources and Contributors
6
Article Sources and Contributors
Anomalistic psychology Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=602371277 Contributors: Aaron Kauppi, Cthulhu Rising, Fodor Fan, GreenUniverse, Gregbard, Grutness,
Hong12kong, Johnfos, JulyRange79, LilHelpa, Peter Damian, Psychicdeli, Second Quantization, SummerPhD, Wbm1058, Widr, , 7 anonymous edits
Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors
File:Henry Maudsley.jpg Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Henry_Maudsley.jpg License: Public Domain Contributors: G. Jerrard
File:Chris French World Skeptics Congress Berlin 2012.jpg Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Chris_French_World_Skeptics_Congress_Berlin_2012.jpg License:
Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Contributors: User:Tokenskeptic
License
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/