Keats As Romantic Poet
Keats As Romantic Poet
Keats As Romantic Poet
@ohn Keats 3along with +ercy Shelley and Cord Byron= is referred to as a
4second generation5 Romantic poet. 3Blae, Wordsworth, and -oleridge mae
up the so:called 4first generation.5=
'he second generation writers tend to be more septical and philosophically
ironic. 'hey are more dubious, for e"ample, about a Wordsworthian 4spirit
that rolls through all things.5 *n Keats,s case, this second:generation
septicism also applies to the poet,s ego. Keats felt that Wordsworth was too
4self focused,5 too consumed by the .uest of the sub2ective self trying to wed
with Fature and the 4spirit that rolls through all things.5 Gor Keats, any
4epiphany5 or visionary 4spot of time5 could only come about by way of what
he called 4negative capability,5 which involves the erasure of self to
e"perience the potent otherness of the world.
Keats is not arguing that we should completely discount the self, and never
have personal convictions. !e,s not saying that we should 2ust let ourselves
roam without any direction. !e,s not arguing that we should constantly change
in fundamental ways, such as one wee we believe in 6od, then we become
atheists, then Buddhists, and so on. *nstead, he,s arguing that truth is no longer
fi"ed or universal or absolute. #ll we have is e"perience. #nd for Keats 3and
the Romantics in general= we must continue to be open to e"perience. We
can,t do that if we,ve got all sorts of fi"ed ideas.
Gor Keats, the truest way of life is one that is elastic and process:based. !e is
trying to get away from system, because system will limit information and
therefore limit understanding. Gor Keats, we have to suspend whatever it is
that maes us a self or an ego. 'hat,s why, for Keats, the poet is the most
4unpoetical5 of all things. !e has no self. !e is always becoming another
beingPa nightingale, a 6recian urn. /liot was in many ways a Keatsian poet
of negative capability. !e eschewed the overly personal or confessional in
poetry. !e suspended the self, the personalPfiltering it through figures lie
+rufroc.
Keats 8 of 14
'he second generation poets are finding ways of letting go of 6od, which the
first generation weren,t ready to do. 'ae a loo at @. !illis Ailler,s boo !he
-isappearance o# God Pthe 4disappearance5 begins here in the second:
generation Romantics. Wordsworth still has the hope that the landscape can be
divine. When we get to Oictorians lie Aatthew #rnold and #lfred Cord
'ennyson, we see that they can,t believe this any longer. Gor them, nature
symboli7es the peace and beauty possible in human e"istence, but it has no
metaphysical implication or higher significance. #rnold writes 4where nature
ends, man begins.5 Byron, Keats and Shelley fall in between the first
generation Romantics 3Blae, Wordsworth, and -oleridge= and the ma2or
Oictorians 3'ennyson, #rnold, and Browning=. 'hese second:generation
Romantics can,t believe in a 4genius loci,5 a spirit of the place. Gor Keats,
nature is beauty, a reminder of a classical world that once was, but Fature is
not divine, as it is for Wordsworth. Qet Keats has not yet reached the sort of
social or more e"istential vision that #rnold, 'ennyson, and Browning e"hibit.
1ne way to find one,s humanity and to fulfill desire is to surrender to passion,
to some ind of Blaean daemonic energy, to the ecstatic sublime. 'hat,s what
Keats,s poetry is often about. Keats once wrote( 41h for a life of sensations,
rather than thought.5 'hen there is also Keats the aesthete, a tutelary genius for
the pre:Raphaelite poets. 'hose who founded the 4art for art,s sae5
movementPthe Rossettis, +ater, SwinburnePlooed to Keats as their model.
Fegation of the self is only the first step for Keats, however( you negate those
things that mae you an ego. But the crucial ne"t step is that then you become
aware that these sorts of e"periences are mysteries and uncertainties. Gor
Keats, if we deal with life e"periences and the ob2ects and beings of the world
using fact and reason, then we distort them. Keats once said that he got inside
a billiard ball to such an e"tent that he could actually feel its roundness. Gor
Keats it,s all about sensual and ecstatic identification.
Keats > of 14
Gor Keats, we have to have agilityPwe have to be able to see it both ways.
1ne could argue that people who don,t do so because of the fear of perple"ity
and parado". But there,s also the possibility that they don,t embrace ambiguity
because they are so 3problematically= confident about who and what they are.
-learly, we have to have models to function and live. But models can only tell
us what we program them to tell us. Keats,s point is that there is no model that
can be programmed in an imaginative way that will allow us to understand the
inds of .uestions he wants to e"plore. So we have to suspend those models,
so that we can be completely open to e"perience in all of its intensity, richness,
comple"ity, and ambiguity. When it,s over, we,ve got to put the model bac on
and act. But that,s at the end. What he,s often left with is not the answer but
the .uestion.
Keats 1< of 14
*n his letters about the chameleon poet, Keats begins to develop his idea of
negative capability. But he,s still only at the beginningPnegating his own
personality, with the e"ception of his advocacy of speculation. But then the
negative capability letter itself 3'o 6eorge and 'om Keats, %ec. ;1:;9, 1819=
he says that 4it struc me, what .uality went to form a Aan of #chievement
especially in Citerature R which Shaespeare possessed so enormouslyP*
mean Fegative -apability, that is when man is capable of being in
uncertainties, Aysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact R
reason . . .
So here is the proper model for KeatsPnot Wordsworth or -oleridge, but
Shaespeare. Keats is taing Shaespeare as his great ideal. Eltimately, Keats
begins to want to combine what he values of the poetry of the pastP!omer,
Oirgil, Shaespeare, which is poetry that has great power and scopePwith
what he admires in his contemporary poets, their inwardness and
psychological e"plorations. /ventually, too, he starts to rethin Wordsworth,
and he tries to decide who was the greater poet, Wordsworth or Ailton.
*n looing at Keats,s famous 41des,5 try to thin about imaginative ascent and
descent. 'he scholar @ac Stillinger claims that the Keatsian speaer always
begins in the world of actuality, taes off on a flight of imagination, but thenP
either because there,s something lacing in the ob2ect he,s meditating on, or
because there,s some problem in maintaining the meditationPthe flight
returns to earth and again with .uestions.
Walter @acson Bate maintains that what these poems dramati7e is the
4greeting of the spirit with its ob2ect.5 Aany readers see Romanticism being
about an attempt to overcome the split between sub2ect and ob2ect through
meditation.
Keats,s approach to a symbol in a poem reveals his desire to see if that symbol
is commensurate with the imagination in its 4stepping towards a truth5 3that,s
Keats,s phrase=. Esing negative capability, Keats causes the ob2ect to become
an ob2ective correlativePa correlate to a specific emotional or psychological
state. Keats is different from Wordsworth, who is more sub2ective and
personality driven. Keats is trying to find an ob2ective correlative, and so he
negates his own personality 3whatever it is in his personally that,s driving him
Pwhether it,s tuberculosis, the death of his brother, his own worries, and so
on=. !e tries to negate that and sympathetically approach the symbol, the
ob2ect. !e tries to capture something in all of its concreteness, particularity,
ambiguity, and he uses the symbol as a field in which opposing attitudes can
engage.
What Keats affirms at the end is the spirit, the symbol, the process. !e doesn,t
want to dissolve the mysteries, the uncertainties that are crucial to that
e"perience, process, and symbol. !e is always being septical, open:ended,
contemplating the variety of ways of looing at an ob2ect. *n the 41de on a
6recian Ern5 the entire poem focuses on the urn. *t,s almost as if Keats is
holding an urn in his hands and turning it) it,s there from beginning to end.
'here is a drama between perception and ob2ect, but that,s the controlling
form of the whole poem. *n the case of the urn, he starts with the wor of art
Keats 11 of 14
itself, and his .uestion is( -an art provide some system of salvation& !e,s
never sure.
Keats,s letters are remarable. 'hey capture someone debating with himself.
What does it mean to be a poet, writing at this particular time in the history of
the world& !e tals about the advance of the age. !e has something of a sense
of an aesthetic revolution. !e,s grappling, debating with all sorts of notions
about where he,s going to go as a poet. #nd he is shadowed by thoughts of
mortality, a sense of nowing that he is going to die 3Keats died at an early age
from tuberculosis=.