Miller, Neil Z. - Vaccine Safety Tricks and Tips

Vaccine Safety Tricks and Tips by Neil Z.
Miller Visit: Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute

Copyright 2013. All Rights Reserved. Recommended books by Neil Z. Miller.

Vaccine Safety Tricks and Tips
Important Information to Protect Your Family from Pharma Fraud
by Neil Z. Miller
I have been investigating vaccines for more
than 25 years. When my son was born, the matter
became important to me. I began by studying
medical and scientific journals. The data was
disturbing. Evidence showed that vaccines are often
unsafe and ineffective. In fact, some vaccines cause
new diseases. I was even more shocked to learn
that powerful individuals within the organized
medical profession including members of the
American Medical Association (AMA), the American
Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), and the World Health
Organization (WHO) are aware of vaccine safety
and protection deficiencies but seem to have an
implicit agreement to obscure facts, alter truth, and
deceive the public. Vaccine manufacturers, health
officials, medical doctors, lead authors of important
studies, editors of major medical journals, hospital
personnel, and even coroners, cooperate to
minimize vaccine failings, exaggerate benefits, and
avert any negative publicity that might frighten
concerned parents, threaten the vaccine program
and lower vaccination rates.
During my research, I discovered a shadowy
underworld of vaccine production and corruption
within the industry. For example, most people have
no idea how vaccines are made or what they
contain. Formaldehyde, aluminum and Thimerosal
yes, some vaccines still contain this dangerous
mercury derivative are just a few of the ingredi-
ents used to manufacture vaccines. In addition, oral
polio vaccines are incubated in monkey kidneys, the
chickenpox vaccine is brewed in human embryonic
lung cell cultures, and the new HPV vaccine
includes particles of sexually transmitted viruses
which are now being injected into an entire
generation of chaste, young girls.
My main goal today in continuing to research
vaccines is to provide families with evidence of
vaccine safety and efficacy defects information
that they are unlikely to hear from their doctors
so that truly informed decisions can be made.
Congressional efforts to initiate positive change
within the vaccine industry have failed, so parents
are the only remaining defense to protect their
children. I am opposed to bogus proofs of vaccine
benefits (including studies funded by vaccine
manufacturers), health mandates (forced immuniz-
ations) and other coercive tactics used to intimidate
wavering parents into vaccinating against their will.
Although generations of children are falling victim
to medical progress, autism and other develop-
mental disorders are not childhood rites of passage.
I researched vaccine studies and articles from
around the world. There is extensive evidence of
vaccine hazards and immunity limitations. I never
intended to ratify traditional beliefs regarding vaccine
safety and efficacy. Instead, my research is
designed to countervail conventional dogma. The
information I uncovered does not support the oft-
heard claim that vaccine benefits outweigh their
risks. If youd like to read more about vaccine
benefits and less about the risks, there are plenty
of official websites that you can visit (or speak to
your doctor). I encourage this course of action. Of
course, official vaccine websites are mainly sup-
ported by vaccine manufacturers and allopathic
health organizations such as the FDA, the CDC, and
WHO institutions with a mandate to promote
vaccines and vaccinate as many people as possible.
1
Vaccine Safety Tricks and Tips by Neil Z. Miller Visit: Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute

Science vs. Science Fiction
Many scientific studies are literally non-
sense. This is not a conspiracy theory. For
example, the Journal of the American Medical
Association recently published a paper showing that
one-third of highly cited original clinical research
studies were eventually contradicted by subsequent
studies. The supposed effects of specific inter-
1
ventions either did not exist as the original studies
concluded or were exaggerated.

Plos Medicine recently published a paper
entitled Why Most Published Research Findings
are False. The author of the study, Dr. John
Ioannidis, is an internationally esteemed scientific
researcher, epidemiologist, and Professor of
Medicine at Stanford University. He concluded that
it is more likely for a research claim to be false than
true. In fact, 80 percent of non-randomized studies
2
turn out to be wrong, as do 25 percent of
supposedly gold-standard randomized trials. At
every step in the process, there is room to distort
results, a way to make a stronger claim or to select
what is going to be concluded, says Ioannidis.
3
Thus, vaccine studies need to be read very closely,
otherwise significant information that could affect
their validity may be overlooked.
In some instances, study results may be
preordained. For example, when the vaccine-
autism link became a public concern, vaccine
proponents moved into high gear to produce
authentic-appearing studies that contradicted
genuine data. I remember when tobacco companies
used this very same ploy. They financed numerous
bogus studies ostensibly proving that cigarettes
didnt cause cancer. The real studies got lost in the
muddle. Sadly, its all too easy to obfuscate truth
and deceive the public.
At the infamous Simpsonwood conference held
in Norcross, Georgia in June 2000, experts knew
that Thimerosal (mercury) in vaccines was
damaging children. They had irrefutable proof
the very reason for convening the meeting. (Dr. Tom
Verstraeten, a CDC epidemiologist whose research
was the focus of the meeting, had analyzed the
agencys massive Vaccine Safety Datalink database
containing thousands of medical records of
vaccinated children. He declared: We have found
statistically significant relationships between
exposure [to mercury in vaccines] and outcomes.
At two months of age, developmental delay;
exposure at three months, tics; at six months,
attention deficit disorder. Exposures at one, three
and six months, language and speech delays the
entire category of neurodevelopmental delays.)
4
Instead of making this important information
public, authorities hatched a plan to produce
additional studies that denied such a link. In fact,
vaccine proponents had the audacity to claim in
subsequent papers that mercury in vaccines not only
doesnt hurt children but that it actually benefits
them! In the topsy-turvy world of overreaching
vaccine authorities, the well-documented neurotoxic
chemical mercury somehow makes children smarter
and more functional, improving cognitive develop-
ment and motor skills. Of course, this is absurd.
5
Many valid studies confirm mercurys destructive
effect on brain development and behavior.
Study conclusions often contradict core
data in the study. I am always astounded when I
read the abstract or summary of a major paper
touting a vaccines apparent safety or benefits, only
to find that upon examining the actual paper,
including important details, the vaccine is shown to
be dangerous and may have poor efficacy as well.
For example, a large study analyzed the safety of
Thimerosal-containing vaccines (TCVs) and found
dangerous side effects: Cumulative exposure at
3 months resulted in a positive association with tics.
In addition, there were increased risks of language
delay for cumulative exposure at 3 months and 7
2

months. Yet, the paper concluded that no con-
sistent significant associations were found between
TCVs and neurodevelopmental outcomes.
6
In another high profile study published in JAMA
Pediatrics in January 2013, researchers compared
fully vaccinated children to children who were under-
vaccinated due to parental choice. (These were
parents who researched vaccines and decided not
to follow the official immunization schedule.) The
under-vaccinated children had lower rates of
outpatient visits and emergency department
encounters. Yet, the paper concluded that under-
vaccinated children appear to have different
healthcare utilization patterns. Sadly, the main-
7
stream media rarely publishes anything that
challenges the sacrosanct vaccine program.
Newspaper stories about vaccines, and reviews of
vaccine studies that are published, merely mimic
the original spurious or deceptive conclusions.
Another ploy used by vaccine proponents
is to design studies comparing vaccinated
people to other vaccinated people. Honest studies
would compare vaccinated people to an
unvaccinated population. For example, the clinical
safety studies for the pneumococcal vaccine
compared the number of adverse reactions in a
group of infants who received the new shot, to a
control group of infants who received a meningo-
coccal vaccine and a DTaP shot. This created the
8
illusion of a similar safety profile. The group
receiving the new vaccine was never compared to
a true control group of unvaccinated infants.
Vaccine control groups rarely receive a true
placebo, which should be a harmless substance.
The scientific method has always been predicated
upon removing all potentially confounding
influences. However, many vaccine studies do not
conform to this integral component of valid research.
This is an important concept to grasp. For example,
when the HPV vaccine was tested for safety, one
group of female teenagers was injected with the
experimental HPV vaccine (which is manufactured
with an aluminum adjuvant to stimulate antibodies)
while the control group received an injection of
aluminum as well (rather than a harmless
substance).
9
When a new rotavirus vaccine was tested for
safety, the control group received a placebo that
had the same constituents as the active vaccine
but without the vaccine virus. Thus, the control
group received a solution containing ferric (III)
nitrate, magnesium sulfate, phenol red, and 10
additional chemical substances everything that
was in the experimental vaccine minus the
rotavirus.
10
When new vaccines are compared to
other vaccines or to placebos that are not harmless,
the rate of adverse reactions in the control group
will be artificially high making the new vaccine
appear safer than it really is. Whenever this
deceptive tactic is utilized, the manufacturer may
claim that its new vaccine has a non-inferior safety
profile.
Some clinical studies that are used to
license vaccines exclude people in certain
groups. For example, they may be too young, too
old, pregnant, ill, or have other preexisting health
ailments. However, once the vaccine is licensed,
it may be recommended for people in these groups.
Much like using false placebos, this unethical
practice artificially inflates the vaccines safety profile
and places more people at risk of adverse reactions.
For example, the New England Journal of Medicine
published a large study that looked at whether
administering Thimerosal-containing vaccines to
infants is safe. However, this study excluded infants
from the study if their birth weight was less than 5.5
pounds even though low birth weight infants are
5
more likely to have serious reactions to Thimerosal-
containing vaccines and low birth weight infants
throughout society received them! (Vaccines are not
adjusted for the weight of the child. Today, a 6-
3

pound newborn receives the same dose of hepatitis
B vaccine with the same amount of aluminum and
formaldehyde as a 12-pound toddler.)
In another study, 73 percent of all children that
were hospitalized after being infected with
chickenpox (varicella) were healthy before
contracting the disease; just 27 percent had
preexisting health problems. (A small number of
children who contract varicella experience serious
complications. Many of these children have
preexisting health problems, such as AIDS,
leukemia or cancer. However, its easier to convince
parents to vaccinate their children against a
relatively benign disease such as chickenpox and
to justify mandating this shot for all children if a
larger percentage of those who experience
complications of varicella are healthy, rather than
unhealthy, before the onset of the ailment. This is
because its frightening to imagine that your normal
child could be devastated by a common disease.
Thus, after the chickenpox vaccine was licensed,
several articles began to appear asserting that such
complications occur predominantly in children in
whom one would not predict problems.) However,
one very important bit of information was easy to
miss if you only skimmed the study it excluded
oncology patients! In other words, this study
omitted unhealthy children (with cancer) from
analysis, then claimed that serious complications
mainly occurred in healthy boys and girls.
11
Vaccine studies may be funded by pharma-
ceutical companies that have a financial interest
in the outcome. Lead authors of crucial studies that
are used to validate the safety or efficacy of a
vaccine are often beholden to the manufacturer in
some way. They may own stock in the company or
may be paid by the manufacturer to travel around
the country promoting their vaccines. Lead authors
may receive consultation fees, grants or other
benefits from the drug maker. For example, the
large pharmaceutical company that manufactured
the shingles vaccine (Merck) participated in
oversight activities and monitored the progress of
the primary study that was used to justify licensing
this vaccine. In addition, some leading authors of
this study received consultation fees, lecture fees,
and honoraria from Merck. Some study authors
received grant support from Merck or owned stock
in the company while concurrently working on the
study, or had partial interests in relevant patents.
12
Several of the authors of the main clinical study
on the efficacy of the HPV vaccine the FDA looks
at this study to determine if this vaccine should be
licensed were either current or former employees
of the HPV manufacturer. Some of the study authors
had an equity interest or held stock options in this
company. Several of the study authors received
consulting fees from or served on paid advisory
boards to this company. These practices contra-
13
vene ethical boundaries and compromise the
integrity of the study. When important vaccine
studies are jeopardized by conflicts of interest,
generations of people and society itself are
placed at risk.
Vaccine Risks, Adverse
Reactions and Death
Although some studies are mere propaganda,
part of a larger disinformation campaign designed
to promote a vaccine agenda, other studies link
vaccines to debilitating and fatal diseases. For
example, the British Medical Journal and
Autoimmunity published data correlating the
haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine to rising
rates of type 1 diabetes.
14,15
The hepatitis B vaccine
has been linked to autoimmune and neurological
disorders, including pediatric multiple sclerosis.
16-18
Guillain-Barr syndrome (a serious paralytic
disease) is a well-known adverse reaction to the flu
vaccine. These are just a few of the many
scientifically documented correlations between
vaccines and incapacitating ailments.
4

Visit: Thinktwice on Facebook.
Vaccine adverse reaction rates have become
unacceptably high. For example, according to the
FDA, FluMist (the live-virus nasal spray vaccine that
is squirted up the nose) can cause medically
significant wheezing and pneumonia. During pre-
licensure clinical studies 3 percent of all children six
months to one year of age who received the vaccine
ended up in the hospital with respiratory problems!
Before this vaccine was approved, a large study
conducted in 31 clinics showed that it caused a
statistically significant increase in asthma or reactive
airways disease in children under five years of age.
Nevertheless, the FDA licensed this vaccine for
children as young as two years old.
19
With some vaccines, the number of people who
experience systemic reactions, such as fever,
headache, respiratory infection, muscle aches,
nausea, abdominal pain, diarrhea, chills and fatigue,
is very high. For example, more than 14 percent of
all infants will vomit following their first pneumo-
coccal shot. A whopping 62 percent of 18-55 year-
8
old recipients of the meningococcal vaccine will have
systemic reactions. (Common systemic reactions
20
are separate from severe and fatal reactions,
including neurological, immunological and paralytic
disorders such as Guillain-Barr syndrome, demy-
elinating diseases, arthritis, anaphylactic shock, and
other life-threatening conditions.) Doctors consider
most systemic reactions normal.
Some vaccines cause encephalitis (inflam-
mation of the brain) and other nervous system
disorders. Injuries caused by vaccines may be
disguised under different names: learning
disability, attention deficit, hyperactivity, epilepsy,
and mental retardation, to name a few. Studies show
that a disproportionate amount of violent crime is
committed by individuals with neurological damage.
There is increasing concern that the rise in criminal
activity and other pathological behaviors (e.g.,
school shootings) may be related to vaccinations.
Many parents are unaware that adverse
reactions are even possible, so they fail to remain
alert for neurological signs and other symptoms in
their babies following their vaccinations. However,
Pediatrics published a study in which parents were
specifically asked to observe any change in their
babys behavior or physical condition after a shot;
just 7 percent reported no reactions at all.
21
Vaccines may cause serious reactions,
including death, yet still remain on the market.
Although the FDA has removed defective toys and
dog food from store shelves, once a vaccine is
licensed it is rarely recalled. (The new diarrhea
vaccine, Rotarix, is an exception; it was recently
recalled after 35 million babies received doses
contaminated with pig viruses.) The HPV vaccine
illustrates this point very well. By March 2013, less
than seven years after Gardasil was licensed in the
United States, more than 26,000 adverse reaction
reports were filed with the federal government. In
the case reports submitted to the FDA, many of the
vaccine recipients were stricken with serious and
life-threatening disabilities, including Guillain-Barr
syndrome, paralysis, loss of consciousness,
seizures, convulsions, swollen body parts, chest
pain, heart irregularities, kidney failure, visual
disturbances, arthritis, difficulty breathing, severe
rashes, persistent vomiting, miscarriages, menstrual
irregularities, reproductive system complications,
genital warts, vaginal lesions and HPV infection
the main reason to vaccinate. More than 10,000
teenage girls and young women were rushed to the
hospital for debilitating ailments following their HPV
shots; at least 120 young ladies died after receiving
their HPV shots. Despite these danger signs, this
22
vaccine remains on the market.
5

A Disability and Death
Tax on Vaccines
The federal government is aware that
vaccines may permanently disable or kill your
baby. In fact, Congress established a disability and
death tax on childhood vaccines. When parents pay
the doctor for requested shots, some of that money
goes into a special fund to compensate them when
their children are seriously damaged or die. As of
March 2013, more than $2.5 billion was granted for
thousands of injuries and deaths caused by
mandated vaccines. Numerous cases are still
pending. Awards were issued for permanent injuries
such as learning disabilities, seizure disorders,
mental retardation, paralysis, and numerous deaths,
including many that were initially misclassified as
sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).
23
The federal government maintains a poorly
publicized, essentially secret, database of
suspected cases of vaccine-related injuries and
death. This database is known as VAERS the
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. The
general public is essentially unaware of the true
number of people mostly children who have
become seriously hurt or died after receiving one
or more vaccines. As of March 2013, more than
350,000 reports have been filed. In fact, every year
more than 25,000 adverse reaction reports are filed
with the federal government. In 2010 and 2011
alone, more than 56,000 reports were added to the
database. These include emergency hospital-
izations, irreversible injuries, and deaths. Still, these
numbers may be grossly underreported because
the FDA estimates that 90 percent of doctors do not
report reactions.A confidential study conducted by

Connaught Laboratories, a vaccine manufacturer,
indicated that a fifty-fold underreporting of adverse
events is likely. Yet, even this figure may be
24
conservative. According to Dr. David Kessler, former
FDA commissioner, only about one percent of
serious events [adverse drug reactions] are
reported. In other words, multiply reported vaccine
25
reactions by 100 for a more accurate sum.
Personal and Societal Costs
of Vaccine Damage
Throughout the many years that I have been
researching vaccines, numerous people mostly
parents have written to me to discuss how their
children were harmed after receiving one or more
vaccines. They felt compelled to share their stories
with anyone who would listen, often to warn others
of the dire possibilities. When we listen to vaccine
victims tell their own stories, we share in their pain.
This cultivates empathy and helps us to understand
the full cost of vaccine damage at both personal and
societal levels. Clearly, the damaged child is not the
only victim; parents are traumatized when they
discover that their child was seriously hurt by one
or more vaccines. Families are often destroyed from
the overwhelming emotional responsibility associ-
ated with caring for a vaccine-damaged child. There
may be a large financial burden as well. Somebody
has to pay for the medical bills and necessary
treatments that might maintain, or hold the promise
of improving, the health and well-being of the
precious child they were entrusted to protect.
Parents of vaccine-damaged children may also
experience anger at the perpetrators, guilt for
consenting to the vaccines, and sadness or grief
for the child who will forever be missing his or her
rightful wholeness in some manner. Brain impair-
ments and immune system damage are difficult to
reverse. Often, the child and family are stricken for
life.
Relationships between husband and wife
are greatly strained when a child is damaged by
vaccines. Some marriages cannot withstand the
stress. Grandparents often grieve as well, both for
their damaged grandchild and the demanding family
life their son or daughter is now destined to live. For
example, autistic children require constant care.
6

Dining out at a restaurant or going to the movies is
either a horrendous chore or impossible.
Undamaged siblings receive less time and attention
from their parents due to the special needs of their
handicapped brother or sister. Everyone suffers to
some degree.
There is a great communal cost as well. Many
permanently damaged children will never grow up
and contribute to society in a meaningful way. There
is a lost brain trust because their originally
anticipated creative gifts to our civilization have been
short-circuited. Of course, some vaccine-damaged
children make wonderful contributions to society and
provide the rest of humanity with several good
reasons to open our hearts while expanding our
grasp of the vaccine dilemma that confronts all of
us, individually and collectively.
Vaccines are Drugs
Parents need to understand that vaccines
are drugs. Each one contains a proprietary blend
of chemicals, pathogens, and other foreign matter.
That is the nature of a vaccine. Today in the United
States, children receive one vaccine at birth, eight
vaccines at two months, eight vaccines at four
months, nine vaccines at six months, and twelve
additional vaccines between 12 and18 months. The
pure and innocent baby is overdosed with 38
vaccine-drugs by the time he or she is 1 years old!
(DTaP and MMR are each given with a single
injection but contain three vaccines. If you pour
three separate glasses of whiskey, gin, and rum into
one container, youre still ingesting three alcoholic
drinks with all of the expected effects.) Imagine
ingesting eight or nine drugs all at once. Thats what
babies receive. In fact, these babies are not
ingesting the drugs; instead, they are usually being
injected directly into their tiny bodies. When did you
last take eight drugs all at the same time? Would
you be more surprised if you did or did not have a
serious reaction?
Some babies receive more than eight or nine
vaccines at once. Since some shot dates are
variable (due to age range flexibility built into the
immunization schedule), it is permissible for babies
to receive up to 13 vaccine-drugs at their 12-month
or 15-month doctor visits! (The vaccines recom-
mended at these ages include DTaP, hepatitis B,
Hib, pneumococcus, polio, flu, MMR, chickenpox,
and hepatitis A.) Up to seven vaccines (for DTaP,
hepatitis B, polio, flu, and hepatitis A) can be
administered to babies at 18 months. Immunization
schedules are similar in Canada, Australia, New
Zealand, the UK and much of Europe.
Vaccines and Infant Mortality
The United States is the most vaccinated
country in the world, yet it has a poor infant
mortality rate. One would think that a country with
more immunizations, which are explicitly promoted
as life saving, especially for babies, would have an
excellent infant death rate. However, the U.S. has
one of the worst infant mortality rates of industrial-
ized nations. In fact, as new vaccines are added to
the recommended vaccine schedule, the U.S. infant
mortality rate worsens. For example, in 1960 (before
mass vaccines) the U.S. had one of the best infant
mortality rates in the world. By 1998, the U.S.
dropped to 28 place. By 2008, this vaccine-crazed
th
nation fell to 45 place worse than Cuba but
th
ahead of Croatia.
26

More recently, I designed and co-authored two
important vaccine studies with Dr. Gary Goldman
that were published in Human and Experimental
Toxicology, a prestigious peer-reviewed journal
indexed by the National Library of Medicine. In our
first study, we found statistically significant correla-
tions between international immunization schedules
and infant mortality rates: nations that require the
most vaccines for their babies tend to have higher
(worse) infant mortality rates. For example, the
27
United States requires infants to receive 26 vaccines
7

(the most in the world) yet more than six U.S. infants
die per every 1000 live births. In contrast, Sweden
and Japan administer 12 vaccines to infants, the
least amount, and report less than three deaths per
1000 live births. Our study also found a biologically
plausible explanation for this counter-intuitive cor-
relation: the potential for synergistic toxicity due to
over-vaccination and the misclassification of baby
deaths as Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)
and other non-vaccine causes. This study raises an
important question: Could we reduce the number
of infant deaths by administering fewer vaccines to
infants?
In our second study, we found statistically
significant correlations between the number of
vaccine doses administered to infants and infant
hospitalization and mortality rates: babies receiving
the most vaccines are the most likely to be hospital-
ized and die. In addition, younger infants were
28
significantly more likely than older infants to be
hospitalized or die after receiving vaccines. While
each childhood vaccine has individually undergone
clinical trials to assess safety, studies have not been
conducted to determine the safety (or efficacy) of
combining vaccines during a single physician visit
as recommended by CDC guidelines. Administering
6, 7, or 8 vaccine doses to an infant during a single
physician visit may be more convenient for parents
rather than making additional trips to the doctors
office but evidence of a positive association
between infant adverse reactions and the number
of vaccine doses administered confirms that vaccine
safety must remain the highest priority.
Weighing the Risks
If you choose not to vaccinate, there are
risks involved. Your child could contract a disease
for which a vaccine has been developed. Your child
might also experience complications from this
disease, which could be permanently debilitating
or life-threatening. Of course, many people exper-
ience disease and then get well. There is evidence
that when children are young and exposed to
disease naturally, and then recover, the immune
system is stimulated and strengthened. When
sickness occurs, the innate intelligence of the body
takes over and mounts a defense; the resourceful
body usually wins the battle. This process is
necessary and appropriate because it improves the
immune systems memory and capability through
its disease-fighting experiences. It may be able to
detect future invaders more quickly and overtake
them before any damage is done. The beneficial
result is that you may be healthier in later life. For
example, several studies show that women are less
likely to develop ovarian cancer if they have had
mumps in childhood.
29-32
Not vaccinating is just one risk; vaccinating is
another. There are also risks every time you walk
out of the house (and risks within your home as
well). Your child could be stung by a bee, hurt in a
car accident, or attacked by a shark while playing
at the beach. These risks need to be weighed free
of fear and bias. If you are afraid of bees, you may
place more emphasis upon protecting your child
from that threat, no matter how remote it may be.
If you have nightmares about sharks, you may avoid
the ocean. Likewise, when diseases are described
in frightening detail and their risks exaggerated
beyond reality, it seems as though they must be
avoided at all costs. Of course, there is a ready
solution fabricated by the vaccine industry. Simply
take a vaccine and another and another and
you will be protected. If only life were so simple.
The Marketing of Fear
With vaccines (and many drugs as well) an
allopathic solution is often developed prior
to the marketing of fear. For example, before the
chickenpox vaccine was licensed for general use
in 1995, doctors would encourage parents to expose
their children to the disease while they were young.
8

Doctors recommended this course of action because
they knew that chickenpox is relatively innocuous
when contracted prior to the teenage years (but more
dangerous in adolescents and adults). However, after
the vaccine was licensed, the CDC began warning
parents about the dangers of chickenpox. Doctors
stopped encouraging parents to expose their children
to this disease. Instead, they were told to get a
chickenpox shot. A promotional campaign to frighten
people about chickenpox was initiated only after the
vaccine became available.
Are Vaccines Effective?
Vaccine efficacy is the most marketable
aspect of preventive healthcare. Every
manufacturer would like to claim that its product is
effective even when the evidence indicates
otherwise. For example, every year, authorities pro-
mote the flu vaccine. However, the British Medical
Journal recently published a report that analyzed
all pertinent influenza vaccine studies and concluded
there is a large gap between evidence of the flu
vaccines efficacy and influenza policies established
by health agencies. Flu vaccines were shown to
have little or no effect on influenza campaign
objectives, such as hospital stay, time off work, or
death from influenza and its complications. Flu
vaccines were found to be ineffective in children
under two years of age, in healthy adults under 65
years of age, and in people aged 65 years and
older. In addition, there is little evidence that flu
vaccines are beneficial when administered to health-
care workers to protect their patients, when given
to children to minimize transmission of the virus to
family contacts, or when given to vulnerable people,
such as those with asthma and cystic fibrosis.
33
Vaccine efficacy may be specious. For
example, scientists presume that certain surrogate
markers or precancerous lesions precede cervical
cancer. With the HPV vaccine (Gardasil), they
simply compared the number of these markers in
women who received the vaccine to the number of
these markers in women who received the placebo.
However, in more than 90 percent of cases HPV
infections are harmless and go away without
treatment. The bodys own defense system
eliminates the virus. Often, women experience no
signs, symptoms or health problems.
Vaccine efficacy may be deceptively
marketed. When the new HPV vaccine was first
introduced, it was promoted as 100 percent
effective. Thus, most people innocently assumed
that if females took the HPV vaccine, there would
be no chance that they could ever be stricken with
cervical cancer. Yet, numerous strains of HPV have
been identified. The vaccine is only 100 percent
effective against two of these cancer-causing
strains not against cervical cancer itself. No
actual cases of cervical cancer were prevented in
any of the test subjects in any of the clinical studies
of the HPV vaccine. In fact, during pre-licensure
studies, 361 women who received at least one shot
of Gardasil went on to develop precancerous lesions
on their cervixes within three years.
34
Vaccines Do Not Target
All Strains of the Disease
Gardasil is not the only vaccine that targets
some strains of the disease while excluding others.
The Hib and pneumococcal vaccines were also
constructed in this manner and have become
problematic due to strain replacement. Scientists
have discovered that when vaccines only attack
some strains of a disease, other strains gain
prominence. The disease becomes more virulent
and people who are normally not susceptible to the
ailment are infected. For example, there are several
different types of haemophilus influenzae, including
types a, b, c, d, e, and f. The b type is just one
strain the only one for which a vaccine was
created the Hib shot. Although this vaccine
appears to have decreased cases of haemophilus
9

influenzae type b in children, the overall rate of
invasive haemophilus influenzae disease in adults
increased. Ironically, researchers do not consider
this a failing of the Hib vaccine; instead, according
to the National Institutes of Health, it raises the
question whether a [new] vaccine will need to be
developed.
35
The pneumococcal vaccine Prevnar 13
is only designed to protect against 13 of the 90
different strains that can cause pneumococcal
disease. Thus, when a child is vaccinated and later
stricken with pneumococcus, the vaccine is still
considered effective if any one of the 77 other
strains (not included in the vaccine) caused the
disease. In addition, the Journal of the American
Medical Association and the Pediatric Infectious
Disease Journal recently published data showing
that non-vaccine strains of pneumococcal disease
were replacing strains targeted by Prevnar 7 (the
earlier version of Prevnar 13). The non-vaccine
36,37
strains are more dangerous and resistant to
treatment. People stricken by them are more likely
to be hospitalized and to be diagnosed with life-
threatening infections. (Prevnar 13 was recently
licensed as an upgrade to the original Prevnar to
temporarily address this problem.)
Vaccinating a Low-Risk Group
to Protect a High-Risk Group
Sometimes vaccines are given to one group
of people mainly to protect another group. For
example, mass rubella vaccination campaigns were
never intended to protect vaccine recipients; the
disease is usually harmless when contracted by
children. Instead, the goal has always been to
protect the unborn fetuses of rubella-susceptible
pregnant women. Authorities reasoned that if all
youngsters, male and female, are vaccinated, the
wild virus should theoretically have fewer hosts
(people) to infect, and pregnant women would be
less likely to contract the disease. Thus, when the
hepatitis B vaccine was originally introduced,
authorities employed this same rationale. The
groups at greatest risk of contracting hepatitis B are
heterosexuals engaging in unprotected sex with
multiple sex partners, prostitutes, sexually active
homosexual men, and intravenous drug users.
Children rarely develop this disease. In the United
States, less than one percent of all cases occur in
persons less than 15 years of age. The disease is
even more uncommon in babies and toddlers.
However, because a vaccination strategy limited
to high-risk individuals has failed, and children are
38
accessible, they are compelled to receive the
39
three-shot series beginning at birth. In other words,
because high-risk groups are difficult to reach or
have rejected this vaccine, authorities are targeting
infants even though infants are not likely to get
this disease. Infants are being subjected to all the
risks of this vaccine without the expected benefit.
Although children are not likely to contract
hepatitis B, many parents allow them to receive the
vaccine because they believe it will protect them as
adults when they may engage in risky behaviors.
However, studies show that hepatitis B vaccine
recipients lose protective antibodies after 5 to 10
years. The vaccine that infants receive shortly after
birth at the hospital will not be effective a few years
later. Thus, booster shots are required.
Booster Shots
The promotion of multiple booster shots is a
disturbing practice. Initially, when a new vaccine is
introduced, a single shot may be recommended.
Later, when the artificial immunity wears off, vaccine
manufacturers and the CDC recommend one or
more additional shots boosters (to increase or
boost the waning antibodies). With natural immunity,
which is acquired by being exposed to the actual
disease, protection is not meager and temporary
but complete and lifelong. The child will rarely
contract the disease again. This is not true with
10

VACCINE SAFETY MANUAL
for Concerned Families and Health Practitioners
by Neil Z. Miller
The worlds most complete vaccine guide.
Important information on every major vaccine.
More than 100 charts and 2,000 citations.
vaccines. Oddly, the vaccine industrys answer to
an ineffective vaccine is to compel more of it!
Unvaccinated Children
Unvaccinated children are often sent home from
school during outbreaks of measles, mumps, and
other contagious diseases. For example, I received
the following letter from a distraught mother:
My daughter was just removed from school
for 21 days due to an outbreak of chickenpox.
She is six years old and in the first grade. We
are very upset.
Ironically, these children are not sent home for
their own protection. On the contrary, doctors claim
that unvaccinated children will spread disease. Of
course, this does not make sense (unless we
consider it a veiled confession of vaccine inefficacy).
How is it possible for an unvaccinated child to imperil
vaccinated children? If the shots are effective, then
vaccinated children should be protected.
Parents of unvaccinated children are more
educated than parents who follow official
immunization recommendations. For example,
a recent study conducted by the CDC discovered
that vaccinated children tend to have mothers who
are poor, unmarried and did not go to college.
Unvaccinated children tend to have mothers who
are financially stable, married, and have a college
degree. Another study, published in the American
40
Journal of Public Health, found that vaccinated
children are more likely to have mothers without a
high school diploma. Unvaccinated kids are more
likely to have mothers who graduated from college.
41
Profiting from Vaccines
Today, new vaccines are being introduced
to counteract problems caused by old vaccines.
For instance, a herpes zoster (shingles) vaccine was
recently introduced to control a shingles epidemic
that is expected to last for more than 50 years.
Research has shown that this epidemic was caused
by the success of the chickenpox vaccine. Both
42,43
shots were developed by the same pharmaceutical
company. (Thats a lucrative business!)
In April 2013, Canadian researchers published
a study outlining their plan to develop a new vaccine
to help control symptoms of autism. This is
44
painfully ironic considering that many parents and
vaccine researchers believe that vaccines are
largely responsible for causing regressive autism.
High-ranking members of the U.S. govern-
ment are aware of shortcomings associated with
the vaccine program. Hearings are regularly held
to highlight problems with individual vaccines as well
as to investigate the integrity of the vaccine program
itself. For example, a June 2000 Congressional
hearing on Conflicts of Interest and Vaccine
Development revealed that members of the
exclusive FDA and CDC committees that are
responsible for licensing and recommending
vaccines for all children in the U.S. are permitted
to have financial stakes in those vaccines. For
example, one member of the FDA committee who
voted to license a dangerous vaccine received
$255,000 per year in research funds from the drug
company that made the vaccine. One member of
the CDC committee who voted to recommend this
dangerous vaccine for all U.S. children held a
lucrative patent on a similar vaccine under develop-
ment and was also paid by the drug industry to
travel around the country promoting the safety of
vaccines. (This vaccine was eventually removed
45
from the market after causing severe intestinal
injuries in numerous babies.)
11

According to Congressman Dan Burton, who
chaired the Congressional hearing, No individual
who stands to gain financially from the decisions
regarding vaccines that may be mandated for use
should be participating in the discussion or policy-
making for vaccines. Yet, no one at the FDA, CDC,
or Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
was willing to acknowledge a problem. Instead, they
continued business as usual. Sadly, despite these
apparent financial conflicts of interest, our law-
makers remain powerless to bring about meaningful
change.
The crowded childhood vaccination
schedule, complete with a mandatory market,
has proven to be a perpetual windfall for
industry insiders. Yet, the real money may be in
adolescent and adult vaccines. Preteens and teen-
agers are already being inoculated with vaccines
for tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis, HPV, meningo-
coccal, pneumococcal, flu, hepatitis A, B, polio,
MMR and chickenpox. Other shots designed for this
age group are in the pipeline. Authorities are
building a platform for routinely vaccinating
members of this lucrative market.
Future trends in the global vaccine market
indicate that pediatric vaccines currently occupy
a higher market share, but this trend will shift
toward adult vaccines. Adults are already being
inoculated with vaccines for tetanus, diphtheria,
pertussis, HPV, meningococcal, pneumococcal, flu,
hepatitis A, B, MMR, chickenpox, and herpes zoster.
Yet, addiction vaccines will have a growth of over
100 percent after their launch, and cancer vaccines
will grow rapidly within the next few years. The
global vaccine market has grown exponentially
during the past several years and was expected to
achieve $34 billion in annual sales by 2013. Of
course, the United States is the largest market for
vaccines which are more profitable than generic
pharmaceutical drugs.
Protecting Children
Several mothers have told me the following
nearly identical story, which I paraphrase. It reveals
so much about the loss of maternal instinct and the
undue authority our society invests in allopathic
physicians:
I took my child in for his 2-month vaccines.
A short time later (this could be anywhere from
one hour to two or three days) he had a
horrible reaction (convulsions, seizures, loss
of consciousness, etc.) and ended up in the
emergency room. My child spent a lot of time
(this could be anywhere from one day to two
weeks) at the hospital while doctors performed
numerous tests. I think the vaccines caused
my childs serious reaction (because he was
fine until he got his shots) but my doctor said
that it was just a coincidence, that the many
vaccines my child received right before he had
his reaction had nothing to do with it. My
doctor said it was caused by something else,
although no one knows what this might be.
The story doesnt end here; it continues:
When my childs 4-month vaccines were
due, I was afraid to take him back to the
doctor. I was pretty sure that his 2-month
vaccines caused his earlier hospitalization, but
my doctor (or the nurse) told me horror stories
about unvaccinated babies. I was afraid, so
I let the doctor vaccinate my child a second
time. Once again, he ended up at the hospital,
this time fighting for his life. And, once again
everyone told me the vaccines had nothing
to do with it.
Now the story takes a twist:
The reason I am telling this to you is because
its time for my childs 6-month vaccines. Of
course I am terrified of the vaccines and very
afraid that if I take my child in, he wont survive
this time. However, the doctor told me that my
child needs his shots. What do you think I
should do?
12

Of course, I never give advice. Parents must
make this decision on their own. What I want to tell
them, is: Wake up! What happened to your
protective impulse? Have you sold it out to these
so-called experts? Do they live every day with your
precious child and know him or her more than you
do? Yes, sometimes the world seems like a scary
place and confronting authority may be more than
you wish to handle. But this is your child. When will
you take a stand on his or her behalf?
Many parents have awakened, but not always
before some damage has accrued. I recently
received the following letter:
I have four children. The first three were
regularly vaccinated as required. A friend of
mine lost a child hours after being vaccinated
and she alerted me to the hazards. Our fourth
child was not vaccinated and is the only one
who is not enrolled in Special Education like
the rest of her siblings.
Writing about vaccines is like traveling into the
mythological underworld where Hades rules. It is
a dark and dismal realm where innocent babies and
their families are deeply traumatized. The call for
a higher power is resounding. Vaccines may have
some benefits in the minds of proponents but these
have to be weighed against true safety and pro-
tection deficiencies.
Additional Research
and Informed Consent
I do not have an agenda other than to alert the
populace to an existing and expanding problem.
Much more needs to be done to awaken the masses
and convince authorities that our current preventive
healthcare paradigm is defective, requiring imme-
diate attention. If you are aware and capable, please
find your voice and speak out. I envision a society
where 1) everyone is free to choose for or against
vaccines, and 2) they have a more thorough under-
standing of vaccines before making their decisions
informed consent. Parents are not getting com-
plete information from their doctors. Moreover,
authorities bully parents into giving additional shots
to their children even after previous doses caused
severe reactions. Thus, educating yourself about
vaccines from multiple sources is essential to
overcome confusion, to establish confidence with
your healthcare decisions, and to maintain equa-
nimity when facing intimidation and coercion.
After thoroughly researching vaccines, your
sensibilities may be overwhelmed. The implications
are immense. Some people will be outraged by what
they discover. Something is very wrong with our
vaccine industry, and now theyll know it. What can
be done? Others will be incensed for different
reasons and will complain whenever vaccine
benefits are not emphasized. Avid vaccine propo-
nents do not want parents and health practitioners
to have access to alternative sources of vaccine
information. Instead, they want you and your family
to rely upon official pronouncements regarding
vaccine safety and protection, information that often
conflicts with the studies and other data easily
accessible with diligent effort.
Vaccines are not appropriate for everyone.
Some people know this but are afraid to face their
doctor, family, and friends. Ultimately, the decision
to vaccinate or not remains with the individual or
parents of the child. Doctors cannot and will not take
responsibility if you or your children are damaged
from vaccines. Thus, decisions should be made only
after examining credible evidence from several
sources. In addition, critical thinking should be exer-
cised when interpreting information. I encourage
everyone to substantiate all of the vaccine data they
are able to uncover and to research this topic even
further if questions still remain. You are entitled to
the facts about vaccines, and are responsible for
obtaining as much information as possible regarding
the safety, efficacy, benefits and risks of vaccination.
13

References
1. Ioannidis JP. Contradicted and initially stronger effects
in highly cited clinical research. JAMA (July 13, 2005);
294(2): 218-28.
2. Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings
are false. PLoS Med 2005; 2(8): e124.
3. Freedman DH. Lies, damned lies, and medical
science. The Atlantic (November 2010).
4. Transcripts of the Simpsonwood meeting are available
at: www.thinktwice.com
5. Thompson WW, Price C, et al. Early thimerosal
exposure and neuropsychological outcomes at 7 and
10 years. NEJM (September 27, 2007); 357: 1281-92.
6. Verstraeten T, Davis RL, et al. Safety of thimerosal-
containing vaccines: a two-phased study of computerized
health maintenance organization databases. Pediatrics
(November 2003); 112(5): 1039-48.
7. Glanz JM, Newcomer SR, et al. A population-based
cohort study of undervaccination in 8 managed care
organizations across the united States. JAMA Pediatrics
(March 2013); 167(3): 274-281.
8. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. Pneumococcal 7-valent
conjugate vaccine (diphtheria CRM197 protein) Prevnar.
Product insert (July 2009), Table 8.
9. Merck & Co., Inc. Gardasil [Quadrivalent human
papillomavirus (Types 6, 11, 6, 18) recombinant vaccine)].
Product insert (June 2006).
10. Ruiz-Palacios GM, Perez-Schael I, et al. Safety
and efficacy of an attenuated vaccine against severe
rotavirus gastroenteritis. NEJM (January 5, 2006); 354:
11-22.
11. Riaza Gomez M, De la Torre Esp M, et al. Compli-
cations of varicella in children. An Esp Pediatr 1999; 50:
259-62.
12. Oxman, MN, Levin, MJ, et al. A vaccine to prevent
herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults.
NEJM (June 2, 2005); 352: 2271-84.
13. The Future II Study Group. Quadrivalent vaccine
against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade
cervical lesions. NEJM (May 10, 2007); 356: 1915-27.
14. Classen JB, Classen DC. Association between type
I diabetes and Hib vaccine: causal relation is likely. BMJ
1999; 319: 1133.
15. Classen JB, Classen DC. Clustering of cases of
insulin dependent diabetes (IDDM) occurring three years
after hemophilus influenza B (HiB) immunization support
causal relationship between immunization and IDDM.
Autoimmunity (July 2002); 35(4): 247-53.
16. Hernan MA, Jick SS, et al. Recombinant hepatitis
B vaccine and the risk of multiple sclerosis: a prospective
study. Neurology (September 14, 2004); 63(5): 838-42.
17. Terney D, Beniczky S, et al. Multiple sclerosis after
hepatitis B vaccination in a 16-year-old patient. Chinese
Medical Journal 2006; 119(1): 77-79.
18. Mikaeloff Y, Caridade G, et al. Hepatitis B vaccine
and the risk of CNS inflammatory demyelination in
childhood. Neurology (March 10, 2009); 72(10): 873-80.
19. FDA (confidential document): FluMist live, attenuated
influenza vaccine briefing document: prior approval
supplemental BLA, indication extension to include children
less than 5 years of age. FDA Vaccines and Related
Biological Products Advisory Committee (April 19, 2007.)
See also the manufacturers product insert.
20. CDC. Prevention and control of meningococcal
disease. MMWR (May 27, 2005); 54(RR07): 1-21.
21. Barkin RM, Pichichero ME. Diphtheria-pertussis-
tetanus vaccine: reactogenicity of commercial products.
Pediatrics (February 1979); 63(2): 256-60.
22. FDA. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
(VAERS).
23. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
www.hrsa.gov
24. Institute of Medicine. Vaccine safety committee
proceedings. National Academy of Sciences: Washington,
DC (May 11, 1992): 40-41.
25. Kessler DA, Natanblut S, et al. Introducing
MEDWatch: A New Approach to Reporting Medication
and Device Adverse Effects and Product Problems. JAMA
(June 2, 1993); 269(21): 2765-68.
26. U.S. Census Bureau. International data base.
Pearson Education, 2009.
27. Miller and Goldman. Infant mortality rates regressed
against number of vaccine doses routinely given: is there
a biochemical or synergistic toxicity? Human and
Experimental Toxicology 2011; 30(9): 14201428.
28. Goldman and Miller. Relative trends in hospitaliza-
tions and mortality among infants by the number of vaccine
doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event
Reporting System (VAERS), 19902010. Human and
Experimental Toxicology 2012; 31(10): 1012-1021.
29. McGowan L, Parent L, et al. The women at risk
for developing ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1979; 7:
325-344.
30. Newhouse ML, Pearson RM, et al. A case control
study of carcinoma of the ovary. Br J Prev Soc Med.
(September 1977); 31(3): 148153.
14

31. Wynder EL, Dodo H, Barber HRK. Epidemiology
of cancer of the ovary. Cancer (February 1969); 23(2):
352-70.
32. West RO. Epidemiologic study of malignancies
of the ovaries. Cancer (July 1966); 19(7): 1001-1007.
33. Jefferson T. Influenza vaccination: policy versus
evidence. BMJ (October 26, 2006); 333: 912-915. See
also the Cochrane Collaboration.
34. Carreyrou J. Questions on efficacy cloud a cancer
vaccine. The Wall Street Journal (Apr 16, 2007): A1+.
35. Dworkin MS, Park L, Borchardt SM. The changing
epidemiology of invasive haemophilus influenzae disease,
especially in persons >65 years old. Clinical Infectious
Diseases 2007; 44(6) :810-16.
36. Singleton RJ, Hennessy TW, et al. Invasive pneumo-
coccal disease caused by nonvaccine serotypes among
alaska native children with high levels of 7-valent pneumo-
coccal conjugate vaccine coverage. JAMA April 25, 2007);
297(16): 1784-92.
37. Farrell DJ, Klugman KP, Pichichero M. Increased
antimicrobial resistance among nonvaccine serotypes
of streptococcus pneumoniae in the pediatric population
after the Introduction of 7-valent pneumococcal vaccine
in the United States. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
(February 2007); 26(2): 123-128.
38. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals. Engerix-B [Hepatitis
B vaccine (recombinant)]. Product insert (December 2006).
39. Schaffner W, Gardner P, Gross PA. Hepatitis B
immunization strategies: expanding the target. Annals
of Internal Medicine (Feb 15, 1993); 118(4): 308-309.
40. Smith PJ, Chu SY, Barker LE. Children who have
received no vaccines: who are they and where do they
live? Pediatrics (July 2004); 114(1): 187-195.
41. Kim SS, Frimpong JA, et al. Effects of maternal
and provider characteristics on up-to-date immunization
status of children aged 19 to 35 months. Am J Public
Health (February 2007); 97(2): 259266.
42. Goldman GS. Cost-benefit analysis of universal
varicella vaccination in the U.S. taking into account the
closely related herpes-zoster epidemiology. Vaccine (May
9, 2005); 23(25): 3349-55.
43. Goldman GS. Universal varicella vaccination: efficacy
trends and effect on herpes zoster. International Journal
of Toxicology (July 2005); 24(4): 205-13.
44. Pequegnat B, Sagermann M, et al. A vaccine and
diagnostic target for Clostridium bolteae, an autism-
associated bacterium. Vaccine (June 10, 2013); 31(26):
2787-2790.
45. Conflicts of Interest and Vaccine Development.
Congressional Hearing (June 15, 2000).
____________________________________
Neil Z. Miller is a medical research
journalist and the Director of the
Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute
(www.thinktwice.com). He has devoted
the last 25 years to educating parents
and health practitioners about vaccines,
encouraging informed consent and non-mandatory laws.
He is the author of several books on vaccinations
(www.vacbook.com), including Vaccine Safety Manual
for Concerned Families and Health Practitioners; Make
an Informed Vaccine Decision for the Health of Your
Child (co-authored with Dr. Mayer Eisenstein); and
Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective? Past
organizations that he has lectured for include the
International Chiropractic Pediatric Association, the
International College of Integrative Medicine, Autism
One/Generation Rescue, the Hahnemann Academy of
North America, and Dr. Gabriel Cousens' Tree of Life
Rejuvenation Center. Mr. Miller is a frequent guest on
radio and TV talk shows, has a degree in psychology,
and is a member of Mensa. His children, who are now
young adults, were born at home and not vaccinated.
15

Miller, Neil Z. - Vaccine Safety Tricks and Tips

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Miller, Neil Z. - Vaccine Safety Tricks and Tips

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Miller, Neil Z. - Vaccine Safety Tricks and Tips

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are some of the ingredients used in vaccine manufacturing according to the author?

What are some of the author's criticisms of official vaccine websites and organizations?

Vaccine Safety Tricks and Tips by Neil Z.

Miller Visit: Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute

You might also like