Comparisons Between Three Open Source Operating System
This document compares three Linux-based operating systems: SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, CentOS, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux. All three are Unix-like systems based on the Linux kernel. SUSE Linux is developed by SUSE for commercial use, CentOS is community-supported and based on Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux is developed and supported by Red Hat for commercial use. The document outlines key details about each including company, licensing, supported hardware, package management, and advantages and disadvantages.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
143 views
Comparisons Between Three Open Source Operating System
This document compares three Linux-based operating systems: SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, CentOS, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux. All three are Unix-like systems based on the Linux kernel. SUSE Linux is developed by SUSE for commercial use, CentOS is community-supported and based on Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux is developed and supported by Red Hat for commercial use. The document outlines key details about each including company, licensing, supported hardware, package management, and advantages and disadvantages.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4
Comparisons Between Three Open Source Operating System
( Linux Kernel Based Open Source OS )
General Information Distribution Characteristics SUSE Linux Enterprise Server CentOS Red Hat Enterprise Linux Company / Developer "Creator" SUSE The CentOS Project Red Hat, Inc. OS Family Unix-like Unix-like Unix-like Based Distribution based on SUSE Linux based on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (based on Red Hat Linux/Fedora)
License GNU General Public License and Various. GNU GPL & various others. Various free software licenses, plus proprietary binary blobs. Marketing Target commercial market (includeMainframes, Server s, Workstations,Supercomp uters) Free computing (desktops,mainframes, serve rs, workstations) Commercial market (including for mainframes, servers ,supercomputers) Initial Public Release March 1994 May 14, 2004 started as RHEL on March 26, 2002 Last Stable Release 11 SP2 6.4 5.9 6.4 5.9 Last Stable Release Date February 15 th 2012 March 12th 2013 January 17th 2013 February 21th 2013 January 7th, 2013 Purpose server, workstation server, workstation server, workstation Maintenance Cost 799$ for one year N/A 799$ Technical Information Distribution Characteristics
Kernel Type Monolithic (Linux) Monolithic (Linux) Monolithic (Linu x) Kernel Programming Language written in the version of the C programming language supported by GCC (which has introduced a number of extensions and changes to standard C) Supported File System (FAT, NTFS, Ext2, Ext3, Ext4, UFS, NFS, ZFS, etc. ) EXT2 Ext3, ReiserFS, XFS, OCFS2 Btrfs NFS JFS VFAT
Security Features Managing X.509 Certification Masquerading and Firewalls SSH: Secure Network Operations Network Authentication Kerberos Installing and Administering Kerberos Encrypting Partitions and Files Confining Privileges System Logger Pluggable Authentication Modules Testing PAM Using Digital Certificates Intrusion Detection SSH: Secure Network Operations Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux)
System Security Services Daemon (SSSD) Security- Enhanced Linux (SELinux) Backup Passphrases for Encrypted Storage Devices sVirt Enterprise Security Client ESC
Variants ( Server, Desktop, etc) Server Desktop Workstation Server Desktop Workstation Server Desktop Workstation ComputeNode Package Management Manager RPM Package Manager RPM Package Manager RPM Package Manager Package Zypper/YaST2 Yum (PackageKit) Yum / PackageKi Management (Install & Update Method) t Advantages & Disadvantages Distribution Characteristics
Advantages - Maintenance support - Windows interoperability - Reliability, availability and serviceability - Security: has EAL 4+ certification - Less expensive in the subscription cost comparing with RHEL - Rapidly upgraded - unlimited sockets support - Very complete and highly scalable server package - SV support - Virtualization - GUI (YAST) Freely available (no licenses) Everything in one channel Strong and big community support Stable/tested easily synchronized with prominent online repositories such as RPM Forge and kernel.org. No need to upgrade to the next major release Not limited by Upstream restrictions Can be easily downloaded via FTP/HTTP/Torrent.
- Maintena nce support - Windows interopera bility - Reliability , availabilit y and serviceabi lity - Security: has EAL 4+ certificati on - Rapidly upgrade - Stable applicatio n developm ent and productio n platform - Disadvantages Costly NO beta versions are provided for the customers to evaluate fast release cycle every year which leads to unstable usage high cost of design - less rapidly upgraded - does not provides the RHN style support - less features
- Costly Limit of sockets supportin g Doesn't work with CentOS, Fedora, Scientific, et al Support not standardiz ed (requires more skilled maintaine rs)