Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 28 views

    Representation Against The Decision of Departmental Selection/ Promotion Committee No.1 Held 28-06-2013 Under The Chairmanship of Dco Toba Tek Singh

    Uploaded by

    ahmadmasood786
    1. The document is a representation letter against a promotion decision made by the District Promotion Committee No. 1 on June 28, 2013. 2. The applicant, Shahid Iqbal Athar, a Senior Clerk, believes he should have been promoted to Assistant/Head Clerk based on his seniority and the vacancy created by the retirement of Munir Ahmed Khan. 3. However, the committee deferred his promotion citing "non-clarity of quota proportion" as the reason, which the applicant argues is unjust as the 25% quota for direct recruitment has already been fulfilled.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Representation Against The Decision of Departmental Selection/ Promotion Committee No.1 Held 28-06-2013 Under The Chairmanship of Dco Toba Tek Singh

    Uploaded by

    ahmadmasood786
    28 views4 pages
    1. The document is a representation letter against a promotion decision made by the District Promotion Committee No. 1 on June 28, 2013. 2. The applicant, Shahid Iqbal Athar, a Senior Clerk, believes he should have been promoted to Assistant/Head Clerk based on his seniority and the vacancy created by the retirement of Munir Ahmed Khan. 3. However, the committee deferred his promotion citing "non-clarity of quota proportion" as the reason, which the applicant argues is unjust as the 25% quota for direct recruitment has already been fulfilled.

    Original Description:

    h

    Original Title

    Shahid Deo(Se)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. The document is a representation letter against a promotion decision made by the District Promotion Committee No. 1 on June 28, 2013. 2. The applicant, Shahid Iqbal Athar, a Senior Clerk, believes he should have been promoted to Assistant/Head Clerk based on his seniority and the vacancy created by the retirement of Munir Ahmed Khan. 3. However, the committee deferred his promotion citing "non-clarity of quota proportion" as the reason, which the applicant argues is unjust as the 25% quota for direct recruitment has already been fulfilled.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    28 views4 pages

    Representation Against The Decision of Departmental Selection/ Promotion Committee No.1 Held 28-06-2013 Under The Chairmanship of Dco Toba Tek Singh

    Uploaded by

    ahmadmasood786
    1. The document is a representation letter against a promotion decision made by the District Promotion Committee No. 1 on June 28, 2013. 2. The applicant, Shahid Iqbal Athar, a Senior Clerk, believes he should have been promoted to Assistant/Head Clerk based on his seniority and the vacancy created by the retirement of Munir Ahmed Khan. 3. However, the committee deferred his promotion citing "non-clarity of quota proportion" as the reason, which the applicant argues is unjust as the 25% quota for direct recruitment has already been fulfilled.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 4

    Page 1 of 4

    To

    The District Coordination Officer
    Toba Tek Singh.

    (Through Proper Channel)
    SUBJECT:- REPRESENTATION AGAINST THE DECISION OF DEPARTMENTAL
    SELECTION/ PROMOTION COMMITTEE NO.1 HELD 28-06-2013
    UNDER THE CHAIRMANSHIP OF DCO TOBA TEK SINGH.
    Respectfully submitted with due honor that I have been performing my
    duties in the capacity of ministerial staff in the school wing of Education
    Department Toba Tek Singh since 09.07.1986. Presently I am working as Senior
    Clerk in the office of the District Education officer (SE) Toba Tek Singh w-e-f
    01.01.2005 to date. As per seniority List of Senior Clerks approved and notified
    by the E.D.O (Edu) Toba Tek Singh, vide no 1307/MS dated 14-03-2007 wherein
    my name appears at serial no15 of the said seniority list.
    The Senior Clerks as per notified Seniority list from Sr.No.1 to 14 have
    availed there in service promotion as Head Clerk/Assistant against the resultant
    vacancies on the basis of their service record of the respective category.
    It is brought to your kind notice that a post of Head Clerk/Assistant was
    caused vacant due to retirement of Mr. Munir Ahmed Khan after
    completion/superannuation age of 60 years on 12-04-2013 vide retirement
    notification issued by the E.D.O. EDU TTS vide NO 6198/B&A-1 dated 10-05-
    2012(Copy Attached). As per seniority list my promotion as Assistant / Head
    Clerk was due on the date of retirement of the above named official. My
    Promotion was to be caused from the date of retirement of the official on the
    basis of seniority cum fitness and eligibility as per standing rules on the subject.
    The District Education Officer (SE) Toba Tek Singh submitted my
    promotion case along with character roll/synopsis and other required certificates
    to the Executive District Officer (Education) Toba Tek Singh for consideration
    Page 2 of 4



    against the existing vacancy of Head Clerk/Assistant vacated by Mr. Munir
    Ahmad Khan O/O Dy. DEO (M) Gojra (Promote).The case of my promotion was
    placed before the district promotion committee No.1 in its meeting dated 28-06-
    2013.According to the working paper I was declared suitable/eligible candidate
    for promotion as Assistant/Head clerk.
    The respective committee deferred my name for promotion to the rank
    of Assistant / Head Clerk with the reason Deferred due to non clarity of quota
    proportion
    In view of the above I may submit my representation against the decision dated
    28-06-2013 taken in the District Promotion committee No.1.on the following
    grounds:-
    1. That total No. of posts of Assistant / Head Clerk in the school wing of
    education department in Toba Tek Singh District is Twenty (20).
    2. That Five (5) posts of Assistant / Head Clerk were filled through direct
    Recruitment against 25% quota and remaining 15 posts of Assistant /
    Head Clerk were to be filled through promotion amongst the Senior
    Clerks as per seniority list of the District.
    3. That after devolution/creation of District Government no post of
    Assistant / Head Clerk was created /sanctioned through SNE by the
    Government in District Toba Tek Singh.
    4. That thereafter, all the posts Assistant / Head Clerk were filled in
    through promotion amongst the Senior Clerks as per seniority list
    approved and circulated by the authority. 25% quota of direct
    recruitment against the twenty (20) sanctioned posts of Head
    Clerk/Assistant was principally observed by the department keeping
    in view in standing rules and instruction issued by the Government
    from time to time.
    Page 3 of 4



    5. That the promotion of the senior clerks against the vacant vacancies
    of Assistant / Head Clerk is to be filled through promotion on the
    basis of seniority instead of direct recruitment of 25 % quota.
    6. That Mr. Munir Ahmad who has been retired from service was also a
    promote as he was promoted as assistant from the post of senior
    clerk on the basis of seniority list. The present post caused vacant due
    to retirement of Mr. Munir Ahmad is to be filled through promotion
    instead of direct recruitment because above named official was a
    promote one and has been retired. It is injustice to fill the post from
    the direct recruitment instead of promoting me against the vacant
    post of Head Clerk/Assistant vacated by Mr. Munir Ahmed Khan.
    7. That 25% quota against the single existing vacancy of Head
    Clerk/Assistant is unrealistic observation/ reason due to which my
    right being an eligible candidate as per seniority list has been
    eliminated.
    8. That it is crystal clear that 25% quota of direct recruitment against the
    total sanctioned strength posts of Assistant / Head Clerk in the
    District has already been observed, utilization of quota against
    present vacant vacancy through direct recruitment does not cover the
    Promotion rules and regulation of ministerial staff/Senior Clerk.
    9. That the promotion of appellant cannot be denied surprising by
    stopping of the practice and policy and policy of in-service promotion
    of candidates carried out which is leacked by policy/regulation having
    the force of law and all of sudden quota cannot be revived in order to
    deprive the appellant from his due right of promotion specially when
    the appellant is eligible to be promoted against a post vacated by
    in-service promote.

    Page 4 of 4



    In view of the above it is prayed that my promotion case may very kindly
    be reconsidered and the decision of the District Promotion Committee No.1
    dated 28-06-2013 may be vacated and I being the senior most Senior Clerk
    may be promoted against the vacancy caused vacant by Mr. Munir Ahmad
    Khan who was a promote. From the above it is crystal clear that the vacant
    post is to be filled through promotion instead of direct recruitment.

    (SHAHID IQBAL ATHAR)
    SENIOR CLERK
    O/O District Education Officer (Sc)
    TOBA TEK SINGH


    Note: Already submitted in E.D.O (Edu) through proper channel
    Copy for Information submitted (Direct) to Worthy District Coordination Officer
    Toba Tek SINGH

    You might also like