33% found this document useful (3 votes)
622 views2 pages

Section-I: Kras (Key Result Areas) Setting: Function Designation Sub-Function 8

This document outlines the process for setting key result areas (KRAs) and targets for an employee's annual performance review. It contains the following sections: Section I describes how the employee and manager will identify 4-5 KRAs, set targets, and assign a weightage to each KRA based on importance, totaling 100%. Section II is for mid-term performance review after 6 months, where the appraiser assesses achievement percentage for each KRA based on a rating scale. They will also provide guidance to help realign efforts if performance is not on the desired level or standard.

Uploaded by

Shailesh Parmar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
33% found this document useful (3 votes)
622 views2 pages

Section-I: Kras (Key Result Areas) Setting: Function Designation Sub-Function 8

This document outlines the process for setting key result areas (KRAs) and targets for an employee's annual performance review. It contains the following sections: Section I describes how the employee and manager will identify 4-5 KRAs, set targets, and assign a weightage to each KRA based on importance, totaling 100%. Section II is for mid-term performance review after 6 months, where the appraiser assesses achievement percentage for each KRA based on a rating scale. They will also provide guidance to help realign efforts if performance is not on the desired level or standard.

Uploaded by

Shailesh Parmar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

SECTION-I: KRAs (Key Result Areas) SETTING

PARTI: Personal details in columns below shall be filled-in by the HR department


PART II: The employee has to list 4-5 KRAs, set targets for the year and assign weightage
in weightage column in order of importance of a KRA in discussion with the appraiser. The
sum total of assigned weightage MUST BE 100.
Signature of Employee
With date
Signature of Immediate Manager
with date
Name
Mr.N.Ananth
Function Edible Salt -Operations
Designation
Dy.General Manager Sub-Function Operations
Grade
8
Appraiser
Assessment Yr.
2008 - 09
Reviewer
Location
Edible Salt - Chennai
HOD
S.Ramesh
Target
Key Result Areas Key Performance Indicators (Timeline, Cost,
Weightage
(KRAs) (KPls) Quality, Quantity or
Asset utilization
1.To reduce power Absolute reduction (Unit per MT of
Frrom 32 to 27 units 30
Consumption in refined salt production) per MT of refined salt
Refined Salt (
Avg.yearly production
vis-a visa vg yearly,
poer consumption)
2.To reduce & save
Savings in Rs.
RS.0.78Iakhs 20
EB Power cost by
reduction from
RS.1.08 lacs per
month to RS.0.95
lakhs per month from
Oct.08 onwards
3.To Control Capex As per Budget
RS.53.50 lakhs 30
expenses of
Thiruporur plant by
not overshooting the
total approved
expenses.
4.10 Control FIXED Rs.
As against last year of Rs. RS.600 per MT of
20
OVERHEADS AT Product.
Thiruporur Plant
Total KRAs Weightage
100
r I Name of Employee: N.Ananth
SECTION -II: MID TERM PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
(To be filled in by the Appraiser & Appraisee)
The individual and the appraiser have to assess the performance for the period of last six
months (April-September) and the appraiser has to provide improvement guidance !counseling
to the individual employee.
Improvement Quidance. if any by the Appraiser
The objective is to re-align the efforts of the employee if the achievements made so far, are not
as per the desired level! standard. (Attachsheets,if required)
Signature of appraiser with date
Performance Rating Scale &Parameters
Rating Point
10 9 8 7 6
Rating
Excellent
Very Good
Good Fair Poor
Achievement% 111% 101-110% 91-100% 81-90% 80%
KRA
Self-Appraisal Appraisal by APpraiser
s
Achievement
Weight- Rating
Achievement
Weight- Rating
No.
%
age
Point WxR
%
age
Point WxR
(W) (R) (W) ( R)
1 NIL 30 0 0
2 NIL 20 0 0
3 100 30 8 240
,
4 81 20 7 140
KRA Score (KS)
100
3.8 380
100

You might also like