Good Laboratory Practices
Good Laboratory Practices
Appendix 1
Good Laboratory
Practices
In Chapter 1, we mentioned that various laboratories are under federal regulation in relation to the
activities and the quality of work performed in the laboratory. These regulations have come to be known
as good laboratory practices (GLPs). There are two sets of GLP regulations, one for the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) and one for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). They differ only in
statements relating to these agencies’ objectives and purposes. The FDA regulations may be accessed at
http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_01/21cfr58_01.html. The EPA regulations may be accessed
at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_99/40cfr160_99.html.
The major subparts of the GLP regulations are listed below:
487
The definitions are for those words and phrases that the reader encounters in the regulations. Examples
are given below.
Quality assurance unit: Any person or organizational element, except the study director, designated
by testing facility management to perform the duties relating to quality assurance of the (non-
clinical laboratory) studies.
Raw data: Any laboratory worksheets, records, memoranda, notes, or exact copies thereof, that are
the result of original observations and activities of a (nonclinical laboratory) study and are
necessary for the reconstruction and evaluation of the report of that study.
Reference substance (EPA only): Any chemical substance or mixture, or analytical standard, or material
other than a test substance, feed, or water, that is administered to or used in analyzing the test
system in the course of a study for the purposes of establishing a basis for comparison with the
test substance for known chemical or biological measurements.
Person: An individual, partnership, corporation, association, scientific or academic establishment,
government agency, or organizational unit thereof, and any other legal entity.
Sponsor: 1) A person who initiates and supports, by provision of financial or other resources, a
(nonclinical laboratory) study; 2) a person who submits a (nonclinical laboratory) study to the
EPA (FDA) in support of an application for a research or marketing permit; or 3) a testing facility,
if it both initiates and actually conducts the study.
Study (EPA): An experiment in which a test substance is studied in a test system under laboratory
conditions or in the environment to determine or help predict its effects.
Nonclinical laboratory study (FDA): An experiment in which test articles are studied prospectively
in test systems under laboratory conditions to determine their safety.
Study director: The individual responsible for the overall conduct of a (nonclinical laboratory) study.
Test substance (EPA): A substance or mixture administered or added to a test system in a study, in
which the substance or mixture: 1) is the subject, or contemplated subject, of an application for a
research or marketing permit, or 2) is an ingredient or product of a substance as defined above.
Test article (FDA): Any food additive, color additive, drug, biological product, electronic product,
medical device for human use, or any other article subject to regulation under the FFDCA or PHSA.
Test system (EPA): Any animal, plant, microorganism, chemical or physical matrix, including but not
limited to soil or water, or subparts thereof, to which the test, control, or reference substance is
administered or added for the study.
Test system (FDA): Any animal, plant, microorganism, or subparts thereof, to which the test or control
article is administered or added for study.
Testing facility (both EPA and FDA): A person who actually conducts a (nonclinical laboratory) study,
i.e., who actually uses the test substance (article) in a test system.
In the paragraph entitled “Applicability to Studies Performed Under Grants and Contracts,” the
regulations state that whenever a sponsor utilizes the services of a consulting laboratory, contractor, or
grantee to perform an analysis or other service, it shall notify this laboratory, contractor, or grantee that
the service must be conducted in compliance with GLPs. Hence, essentially all phases of the work are
covered by the regulations whether performed by an outside organization or the sponsor’s own laboratory.
The paragraph that discusses the “Inspection of a Testing Facility” is of significant importance. It is
found in both the EPA and FDA GLPs and, in essence, allows government representatives to enter the
facilities and inspect and copy all records within the scope of the work at reasonable times and in a
reasonable manner. A key statement here is that the EPA (or FDA) will not consider a study in support
of an application for a permit if the testing facility refuses to permit inspection. Thus a facility must
permit inspection. This inspection, or audit as it is often called, is therefore taken very seriously.
The EPA regulations include a statement of compliance or noncompliance (§160.12) and a statement
indicating the effects of noncompliance (§160.17), while the FDA regulations address these issues in their
Subpart K. The EPA statements say that any person who submits an application for a research or marketing
permit shall submit a statement signed by the applicant, the sponsor, and the study director that the
study was either conducted in accordance with GLPs, conducted in part in accordance with GLPs (with
those parts not so conducted described), or conducted such that it was not known whether it was in
accordance with GLPs. As to noncompliance consequences, the EPA regulations say that the EPA may
refuse to consider reliable any data from a study that was not conducted in accordance with GLPs and
that severe penalties may result from submission of a compliance statement that is false.
The FDA statements in Subpart K are much more explicit and detailed. While the EPA statements are
described in just the two paragraphs mentioned above, the FDA statements are written in a total of eight
paragraphs.
A1.3 Facilities
The facilities for the study are described in Subpart C for both the EPA and the FDA regulations. There
are six paragraphs under Subpart C in each case, and the titles of these paragraphs are very similar. The
key points here are: 1) facilities must be of suitable size and construction and must be designed so that
they are separate from other activities so as to prohibit adverse effects on the study from the other
activities, 2) proper separation of test systems, including waste disposal systems, must be maintained, 3)
storage areas for feed, nutrients, soils, bedding, supplies, and equipment shall be provided, and the areas
for storing feed, nutrients, soils, and bedding shall be separated from the test systems, and, in addition,
these facilities shall be provided as required by the written protocol, 4) facilities for handling test articles,
control articles, and reference substances, including receipt and storage, mixing, and storage of prepared
mixtures, shall be organized so as to prevent mix-ups and to preserve the identity, strength, purity, and
stability of the articles and mixtures, 5) special laboratory space shall be provided as needed for all
procedures, and 6) there shall be archives, limited to access by authorized personnel, for storage of study
records and specimens.
A1.4 Equipment
Subpart D presents the regulations for the equipment used in a study. There are two paragraphs in both
sets, the FDA and the EPA GLPs, one for equipment design and one for maintenance and calibration.
The texts of both sets are virtually identical, stating that all equipment must perform as required by the
protocol and that this equipment must be maintained and calibrated. Formal standard operating proce-
dures (SOPs) must be on file for this and must set forth in sufficient detail the methods, materials, and
schedules to be used in the inspection, cleaning, maintenance, testing, calibration, and standardization
of equipment and also name the person responsible. In addition, written records shall be maintained for
this activity, including records of any malfunctions, how these were discovered, and what corrective action
was taken. We mentioned this subpart previously in our discussion of calibration of equipment.
Second, in terms of handling, the regulations state that procedures must be established to ensure that:
1) there is proper storage, 2) contamination or deterioration is avoided during handling, 3) proper
identification is maintained throughout the study, and 4) the receipt and distribution is documented for
each batch. The concept of the chain-of-custody documentation is thus covered in the regulations.
Third, for each substance (or article) that is mixed with a carrier (solvent or other medium): 1) the
uniformity or concentration shall be determined, 2) the solubility shall be determined (EPA only), and
3) the stability in the mixture shall be determined. Expiration dates shall be clearly shown and (EPA
only) the device used to formulate the mixture shall not interfere with the integrity of the test.