This document provides details on a reconstructed late 14th century fitted gown made of red wool lined with blue linen. It describes the gown's silhouette, materials, and construction techniques based on period illustrations and archaeological evidence. The gown features a tight fit, interlined construction for strength, and flat-felled seams on high stress areas with running stitches on skirt seams, in keeping with common medieval practices.
This document provides details on a reconstructed late 14th century fitted gown made of red wool lined with blue linen. It describes the gown's silhouette, materials, and construction techniques based on period illustrations and archaeological evidence. The gown features a tight fit, interlined construction for strength, and flat-felled seams on high stress areas with running stitches on skirt seams, in keeping with common medieval practices.
This document provides details on a reconstructed late 14th century fitted gown made of red wool lined with blue linen. It describes the gown's silhouette, materials, and construction techniques based on period illustrations and archaeological evidence. The gown features a tight fit, interlined construction for strength, and flat-felled seams on high stress areas with running stitches on skirt seams, in keeping with common medieval practices.
This document provides details on a reconstructed late 14th century fitted gown made of red wool lined with blue linen. It describes the gown's silhouette, materials, and construction techniques based on period illustrations and archaeological evidence. The gown features a tight fit, interlined construction for strength, and flat-felled seams on high stress areas with running stitches on skirt seams, in keeping with common medieval practices.
1380 Western European Fitted Gown, Lined in Blue Linen
Charlotte Zificsak (Lady Mathilde)
Northern Lights March, 2004 Page 1 of 10 Red c. 1380 Western European Fitted Gown, Lined in Blue Linen
Charlotte Zificsak (Lady Mathilde) Northern Lights - March, 2004
Summary
This gown is an example of a late 14 th century (c. 1380 - 1400), fitted, self-supporting versatile undergown, with silhouette common to England, France, and northern Italy. The front lacing and fitted sleeves will allow the wearer to layer it with other clothing. It is made with fine, lightweight wool, and fully interlined in blue linen for strength and drape. The gown is 100% hand sewn and finished with silk twist, hand done eyelets in silk, tabby woven silk facing at the front opening, a filament silk fingerloop lace, and a brass lace chape. All of the stress bearing seams are flat-felled for strength, and the skirt seams were finished with a running stitch, a period fabric-joining technique found commonly in archaeological finds. The shape of the gown is based on contemporary illustrations, and all finishing techniques were based on archaeological evidence.
Introduction
From the 1340s until well into the 15 th century, a fitted style of gown was worn by women of all rank and age. Though there were a variety of silhouettes during this time, and innumerable sleeve and decorative combinations, this gown was characterized by a tight or body skimming fit, set-in long sleeves, and a fairly full skirt. Even once the gown by itself became less visible over time, it likely became the under layer for continuing fashions in the 15 th century. Much of the construction, such as cutting and shaping, must be guessed at, based on studies of the silhouettes depicted in period illumination. However, the Museum of London has published material detailing extant textile finds in deposits along the Thames River.
My intention is not to re-invent the wheel; much work that has gone into experimenting with the fit and cut of the bodice of these gowns has been done by other researchers, namely Tasha McGann (Mistress Marcele de Montsegur) and Robin Netherton. I, myself, have used their research in performing numerous fittings for self-supportive 14 th century gowns for women of all sizes and shapes. My goal here, however, is to take that research, and combine it with the information in the Museum of London publications and create a dress that provides the wearer with the correct silhouette, and uses period appropriate techniques and finishing details.
Page 2 of 10 The Late 14 th Century Silhouette in Art This is a non-exhaustive set of examples depicting the 1380s silhouette.
Roses, from the Theatrum of Casanatense of the Tacuinum Sanitatis, late 14 th c. 1
A wedding, The Parament Master, c. 1380 3
Joan de la Tour, c. 137786 2
1 Gode Cookery [on-line]. 2 Crowfoot et al, p. 181, Joan de la Tour, weeper from the tomb of Edward III 3 McGann, Love Layers [on-line], p. 23. Page 3 of 10
The Author in Her Representation
Page 4 of 10 Attaches to Front panel Attaches to Back panel Materials and Techniques
Pattern and fitting
The gown was fit using a mock up made directly on my body using the method described at Tasha McGanns website, Cotte Simple 4 . This method uses the idea of negative ease (fabric being used to shape the body) to achieve a fitted, bust supportive silhouette. Because a curved front seam can be difficult to re-fit for different body sizes, I decided to experiment with slightly straightening out the front seam. The straighter front seam doesnt work as well with my body shape, as it tended to flatten me rather than support me, therefore I will probably return to using a deeper curve in this seam to achieve a more comfortable and natural fit.
This gown is cut with four main body panels, with gores between the panels to achieve fullness in the skirt. Each body panel is shaped to fit the torso, and the skirt panels fall straight to the floor from the hip. The gores are inserted at the hip to begin fullness at that point. Cutting the gores separately from the body panels also allows for excellent fabric conservation.
There are two right triangle gores inserted into each seam, with the exception of the back seam, which is an entire isosceles triangle achieved with the cutting method (Fig 1). The gores in the front seam are inserted with the on grain side in the center, and the bias sides attached to the body pieces. The side gores are inserted in a sort of pinwheel pattern, always with bias to straight. This was an experiment to see what kind of drape was produced. I saw no advantage over an isosceles gore, as the front, and will likely not do this again. As all four of the body pieces are cut with only on-grain seams in the skirt, this gore layout will never result in a bias attached to a bias.
Back Sides Front
Fig 1 Gore styles
4 McGann. La Cotte Simple [on-line]. Page 5 of 10 The sleeves of the garment are close fitting to the wrist, straight sleeve with no buttons (Fig 2). There is slight ease at the elbow to allow for the bending of the arm. The armhole is cut very close to the shoulder to allow for maximum arm movement. The main seam of the sleeve, going down the back of the arm, is flat-felled for strength as, especially near the top, it is under quite a bit of stress.
Fabric and fiber choices
The red fabric used for the gown is a very lightweight wool, which may contain a small quantity of silk. It is tabby woven, and the thread of the warp is much finer than that of the weft, which I believe gives it the satin- like sheen. This fabric is very delicate to work with, as it tends to unravel very easily. All seams are stitched with spun silk thread, 100/3 Au Ver a Soie. Seams under stress are stitched with two strands, although some finishing was done with a single strand.
The gown is fully interlined in blue linen. I cut the outer fabric and the lining fabric together and basted the layers to each other immediately after cutting. From that point on, the two layers were treated as one layer of fabric for all seam and edge treatments. The outer wool fabric is very delicate, and a seam would not likely stay without some sort of reinforcement. Interlining in linen allowed me to create a supportive gown with strong seams. An historical example of a gown lined in linen is the Uppsala Gown, also known as the Golden Gown of Queen Margareta. According to Marc Carlson, on his website, this dress is made from gold fabric, a blend of gold and silk. It is made from four quarters, with no gores, and attached sleeves. From the waist up, it is lined in heavy linen. From the waist down, it is unlined. 6 Heather Rose Jones, using the same source as Mr. Carlson, describes how
the [Uppsala gown] (at least the upper part, if not the whole) was lined with linen, but the details are not given and cannot entirely be retrieved from the photos. At the seam lines, the linen lining seems to be sewn to the main fabric (as well as the lining pieces being sewn to each other). 7
5 Frres, The Marriage at Cana, c. 1380, Pl. 58. 6 Carlson [on-line]. Mr. Carlsons cites his source for the Uppsala gown info as Geijer, Agnes, Anne Marie Franzen and Margareta Nockert. Drottning Margaretas gyllene kjortel i Uppsala domkyrka. Stockholm: Kingl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien, 1994. [The Golden Gown of Queen Margareta in Uppsala Cathedral]. 7 Jones [on-line]. Also referring to Geiger, same reference as Marc Carlson.
Fig 2 Example of tight fitting sleeves without buttons. Also an example of the 1380s silhouette. 5
Page 6 of 10
I cannot clearly prove that my lining method was used in medieval gowns; however, there seems to be little proof of any particular type of lining method. I used a process which functionally gave the most strength and protection to the seams of the delicate wool.
Period seam treatments and finishing techniques
Because the torso seams are taking the most stress, these are flat-felled to provide double strength. The first line of stitching was done with the pieces right sides together, with a half back stitch in silk thread for maximum strength. One side of the seam allowance was folded over the other side, and stitched to the main body again with a half backstitch.
The most common way found in the London textile deposits to join two pieces of fabric was with a simple running stitch, as described:
Today the most traditional form of seam is that where a line of stitching runs parallel with the two raw edges to be joined, and it has to be assumed that by the middle ages too this was the most usual method for joining textiles. Although a number of seams of this kind survive among the London textiles, the stitching threads have almost completely disappeared, leaving well-defined stitching holes. From this evidence it is possible to show that in the majority of cases a fairly fine running stitch was usual for holding the two edges together. 8
As the skirt seams on this gown are under little stress, I decided to use the running stitch. In order to protect the raw edges, the seam allowance was then folded outwards and tacked down with running stitches:
Added strength was given to these seams through the use of a row of running-stitches on each side of the seam, worked through both seam allowance and outer layer; parallel with and close to the seam (about 2- 3mm). This held the seam allowances underneath flat 9
Unfortunately, this leaves a very weak, single row of stitches joining these skirt pieces. I will probably never use that particular seam treatment again, due to its unstable nature.
The hem and neckline were both finished using the same treatment. They are both essentially a double folded hem held with hemstitch, and reinforced with a topstitched running stitch along the edge. Even though most woolens in the deposits were hemmed with a single fold, the delicate nature of this wool required the edge protection of a double fold. The addition of the running stitch gives the
8 Crowfoot et al, p. 155. 9 Ibid., p. 156. Page 7 of 10 edge a pleasing and firm flatness, and was done on some single fold hems to provide additional strength. 10
Eyelets and lacing
The supportive undergown would likely have been laced to allow for another gown to be worn over it. 12 The front opening is worked with eyelet holes to allow for lacing of the garment. As the front opening is subject to heavy stress, I attached an on-grain tabby woven strip of silk broadcloth as a facing, and stitched the eyelets through all layers. An extant example of a neckline facing was attached in the following way:
In both instances a 3mm fold of the curved woolen edge has been turned inward and covered with a 5mm-wide strip of silk held firmly in place by two rows of tiny running-stitches which slightly puncture the upper, outer surface. The lower edge of each facing is additionally held in place by small slanted hem-stitches, approximately 34mm apart. 13
The facings applied to buttonhole edges were worked similarly, but without the rows of running stitches. Button or eyelet holes would hold the fabric in place without need for the additional stitches. There is one example of eyelet holes surviving in the London finds, and they are stitched to a silk tabby woven facing with evidence that it was part of a wool garment. 14 The lacing holes are offset to allow for a spiral-lacing scheme without shifting the opening (Fig 3).
10 Ibid., pp. 156-7. 11 Ibid., p. 165. Effigy of Catherine Beauchamp, countess of Warwick, c. 1370-75, St. Marys Church, Warwick 12 McGann, Love Layers [on-line]. 13 Crowfoot et al, p. 160. 14 Ibid., pp. 164, 166.
Fig 3 Example of offset eyelets for spiral lacing. 11
Page 8 of 10 The eyelets themselves are finished with Grandeur twisted silk, silk pearl #5. I opened the hole using an awl, and worked a buttonhole stitch around the edge, carrying extra thread between the facing and the front to work the next eyelet 16 (Fig 4). I underestimated the size that I needed, and the eyelets are not as large as I would like; next time I will start with a larger hole.
The gown is laced with a fingerloop braid executed in Trebizond, a 3-ply filament twisted silk. Such braids were found in the London deposits, including five loop silk braids from both the first half of the 14 th c., and the last quarter of the 14 th c. 17 As my eyelet holes are small, I chose a five loop braid, A Round Lace of V Bowes 18 .
The lace chapes, or aglets, are made out of .005 thick sheet brass, with two holes punched in the wide end. After securing the end of the lace with stitches, I applied beeswax to the end to allow it to slide into the chape. I inserted the lace into the chape, and tightened the metal around the lace. The chape I created was a little too large, as the seam overlaps. Most of the extant examples from the London deposits meet at the edges, but a few examples have an overlapping seam. 19 I crimped the metal around the base of the chape, and additionally secured the chape by stitching through the punched holes, thereby securing it to the lace.
15 Crowfoot et al, p. 164. 16 Ibid., p. 166. 17 Ibid., p. 138. 18 Swales et al, p. 27. 19 Egan et al, pp. 281-285.
Fig 4 Eyelet Holes 15
Page 9 of 10 Bibliography
Carlson, Marc. Some Clothing of the Middle Ages Tunics Uppsala Gown. 1998 (accessed March 21, 2004). http://www.personal.utulsa.edu/~marc- carlson/cloth/uppsala.html
Crowfoot, Elisabeth; Frances Pritchard; and Kay Staniland. Textiles and Clothing: c.1150 c.1450, vol. 4 of Medieval Finds from Excavations in London, 2 nd ed., Suffolk, Boydell Press, 2001
Egan, Geoff, and Prichard, Frances. Dress Accessories: c.1150 c.1450, vol. 3 of Medieval Finds from Excavations in London, 2 nd ed., Suffolk: Boydell Press, 2002.
Frres, Draeger, ed. Les Grandes Heures de Jean de France, Duc de Berry. Paris: Bibliothque Nationale, 1971
Matterer, James L. ed. A Boke of Gode Cookery: Tacuinum Sanitatas. 2004 (accessed March 21, 2004). http://www.godecookery.com/tacuin/tacuin.htm
McGann, Tasha Kelly. How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love Layers: An Analysis of Fitted Dress Styles Depicted in the Art of the Late 14 th /Early 15 th Century. 2003 (accessed March 21, 2004). http://www.cottesimple.com
McGann, Tasha Kelly. La Cotte Simple: An Exploration of Clothing and Accessories of the Late 14 th and Early 15 th Centuries. 2003 (accessed March 21, 2004). http://www.cottesimple.com
Newton, Stella Mary. Fashion in the Age of the Black Prince: A Study of the Years 1340 - 1365. Suffolk: Boydell Press, 1999.