This document lists the defendants' preliminary witnesses and exhibits they may present at trial in the case of Judicial Watch, Inc. et al. v. J. Bradley King et al. The witness list includes election officials, expert witnesses for both sides, and potential rebuttal witnesses. The exhibit list includes depositions, reports, documents from election agencies, and materials to be used for impeachment or rebuttal. The defendants reserve the right to supplement these lists until the close of discovery.
This document lists the defendants' preliminary witnesses and exhibits they may present at trial in the case of Judicial Watch, Inc. et al. v. J. Bradley King et al. The witness list includes election officials, expert witnesses for both sides, and potential rebuttal witnesses. The exhibit list includes depositions, reports, documents from election agencies, and materials to be used for impeachment or rebuttal. The defendants reserve the right to supplement these lists until the close of discovery.
This document lists the defendants' preliminary witnesses and exhibits they may present at trial in the case of Judicial Watch, Inc. et al. v. J. Bradley King et al. The witness list includes election officials, expert witnesses for both sides, and potential rebuttal witnesses. The exhibit list includes depositions, reports, documents from election agencies, and materials to be used for impeachment or rebuttal. The defendants reserve the right to supplement these lists until the close of discovery.
This document lists the defendants' preliminary witnesses and exhibits they may present at trial in the case of Judicial Watch, Inc. et al. v. J. Bradley King et al. The witness list includes election officials, expert witnesses for both sides, and potential rebuttal witnesses. The exhibit list includes depositions, reports, documents from election agencies, and materials to be used for impeachment or rebuttal. The defendants reserve the right to supplement these lists until the close of discovery.
The document outlines witness and exhibit lists for an upcoming trial between Judicial Watch Inc. and Indiana election officials.
The document provides defendants' final witness and exhibit lists that may be presented at an upcoming trial.
Witnesses include election officials and experts from both sides. Exhibits include reports, depositions, correspondence and other documents related to Indiana's voter registration procedures.
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) 1:12-cv-800-WTL-TAB ) J. BRADLEY KING, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
DEFENDANTS FINAL WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST
The defendants submit their final lists of witnesses and exhibits they may present at trial. The defendants respectfully reserve the right to supplement this list as discovery proceeds until its closure on December 11, 2013. Preliminary Witness List: 1. Trent Deckard, Co-Director, Indiana Election Division
8. Individuals identified by the defendants as witnesses.
8. Individuals for the purpose of rebuttal.
Case 1:12-cv-00800-WTL-TAB Document 67 Filed 09/17/13 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 327 2
Preliminary Exhibit List: 1. The pleadings in this matter, and all exhibits or attachments. 2. Report of Eitan Hersh, Ph.D., the defendants expert witness, and documents relied upon and referenced. 3. Report of Karen Handel, the plaintiffs expert witness. 4. Deposition of Sarah Redman, Warrick County Circuit Court, and all attached exhibits. 5. Deposition of Terrence Coleman, St. J oseph Voter Registration Board Member, and all attached exhibits. 6. Deposition of Francisco Fotia, St. J oseph Voter Registration Board Member, and all attached exhibits. 7. Deposition of Trent Deckard, Indiana Election Division Co-Director, and all attached exhibits. 8. Deposition of J . Bradley King, Indiana Election Division Co-Director, and all attached exhibits. 9. Indiana Election Division Co-Directors interrogatories and responses. 10. Indiana Election Division Co-Directors interrogatories and responses. 11. The plaintiffs request for admissions and the defendants responses. 12. The plaintiff True the Vote interrogatory responses. 13. The plaintiff J udicial Watch interrogatory responses. 14. 2012 Election Administration Manual. 15. 2012 Voter Registration Guidebook 16. Standard Operating Procedures of the Indiana Election Division. Case 1:12-cv-00800-WTL-TAB Document 67 Filed 09/17/13 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 328 3
17. NVRA training materials of the Indiana Election Division (excerpts). 18. SVRS Core team meeting documents (excerpts). 19. Social Security Administration inquiry letter dated October 3, 2008. 20. Voter list maintenance reminders to counties, e.g. February 27, 2013 letter to County Board of Voter Registration members and Circuit Court Clerks. 21. U.S. Election Assistance Commission Report. 22. NASS Report: Maintenance of State Voter Registration Lists. 23. PEW Center on the States Issues Brief, February 2012. 24. Any and all documents needed for impeachment and/or rebuttal purposes. 25. All documents identified in the plaintiffs exhibit list.
Respectfully submitted,
GREGORY F. ZOELLER Indiana Attorney General Attorney No. 1958-98
By: /s/ Jefferson S. Garn J efferson S. Garn Deputy Attorney General Attorney No. 29921-49
Case 1:12-cv-00800-WTL-TAB Document 67 Filed 09/17/13 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 329 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this 17th day of September, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system. Notice of this filing will be sent to the counsel of record by operation of the Courts electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Courts system.
/s/ Jefferson S. Garn J efferson S. Garn Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Indiana Attorney General Indiana Government Center South, 5th Floor 302 W. Washington Street Indianapolis, IN 46204-2770 Telephone: (317) 232-6292 Fax: (317) 232-7979 Email: [email protected]
Case 1:12-cv-00800-WTL-TAB Document 67 Filed 09/17/13 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 330
Judge Mary Ann Grilli 2011 Statement of Economic Interests California Form 700: Judge Mary Ann Grilli Santa Clara County Superior Court - Presiding Judge Rise Jones Pinchon - Cleveland State Law Review: Socioeconomic Bias in the Judiciary - California Code of Judicial Ethics Canons 3B(5),(6), 3C(2)(5) Prohibiting Bias Based on Socioeconomic Status
California Judicial Branch News Service - Investigative Reporting Source Material & Story Ideas
United States v. Yvonne Melendez-Carrion, Hilton Fernandez-Diamante, Luis Alfredo Colon Osorio, Filiberto Ojeda Rios, Orlando Gonzales Claudio, Elias Samuel Castro-Ramos and Juan Enrique Segarra Palmer, 804 F.2d 7, 2d Cir. (1986)
United States v. Robert A. Leventhal, Personally and in His Representative Capacity As Partner/officer of Leventhal & Slaughter, P.A., 961 F.2d 936, 11th Cir. (1992)