Weirs For Flow Measurement Lecture Notes
Weirs For Flow Measurement Lecture Notes
Weirs For Flow Measurement Lecture Notes
2h
>
(1)
8.
2
For accurate measurements the depth over the crest should be no more than
one-third the length of the crest
9. The depth of water over the crest should be no less than two inches (50 mm), as
it is difficult to obtain sufficiently accurate depth readings with smaller depths
10. The crest should be placed high enough so w
aving an air space under the over-falling she
ater will fall freely below the weir,
et of water. If the water below the
d the weir is then
To prevent erosion by the falling and swirling water, the channel downstream
from the weir should be protected by loose r
le
weir rises above the crest, this free fall is not possible, an
operating under submerged-flow conditions.
11.
ock or by other material
12. You can assume that the discharge measurement accuracy of a sharp-crested
weir under free-flow conditions is within 2% under the best field conditions
13. Dont design a weir in which the minimum measurable flow rate is less than 2%
of the maximum flow rate, because you wil
such small flows.
l not be able to accurately measure
BIE 5300/6300 Lectures 65 Gary P. Merkley
en channels
Note that it is not always possible to achieve the above guidelines when using
sharp-crested weirs for flow measurement in op
But some things can be compensated for, such as an approach velocity which is
Also, the P > 3h restriction is not always necessary (e.g. the C
e
graphs below
ir is
VII e ns
ir
using numerical
In terms of one-dimensional flow, the Bernoulli equation can be written from a
follows:
u
have h
u
/P up to a value of 2.4)
As the ratio of P/h
u
decreases, the calculated flow rate over the we
increasingly underestimated
Never let P < h
u
unless you are prepared to develop a custom calibration
. D rivation of the Free-Flow Weir Equatio
An equation for accurately describing the head-discharge relationship over a we
under free-flow conditions cannot be derived purely from theoretical
considerations assuming one-dimensional flow
Theoretical calibrations can be derived based on 3-D flow analysis and a few
assumptions, but so far this can only be done with models
approximations
(9)
For field calibrations it is useful to apply Eq. 7 for rectangular weirs and Eq. 9 for
These coefficients will include the effects of approach velocity, nappe shape, weir
Note also that Eq. 9 is of the same form as the free-flow calibration equation for
nonorifice open-channel constrictions
The general form of Eq. 9 can be used to calib
5/ 2
dv
h Q C =
triangular weirs
e
e L
L L K = + (11)
H e u
h h K = + (12)
here L
e
= the effective weir length
L = the measured weir length
h
e
= the effective head
h
u
= the measured head above the weir crest (ft)
C = the effective discharge coefficient
K correction to the measured head (ft)
pressed weirs)
w
e
H
= a small
For weirs with L/B = 1 (sup
vater and Carter tests:
(a) According to the Kinds
u
e
h
C 3.22 0.40
P
= + (13)
for K
H
= 0.003 ft and K
L
= -0.003 ft, with Q in cfs and head in feet.
(b) According to the Bazin (1886) tests:
u
e
h
C 3.25 0.445
P
= + (14)
for K
H
= 0.012 ft and K
L
= 0, with Q in cfs and head in feet.
(c) According to the Schroder and Turner (1904-1920) tests:
u
e
h
C 3.21 0.45
P
= + (15)
Gary P. Merkley 68 BIE 5300/6300 Lectures
for K
H
= 0.004 ft and K
L
= 0, with Q in cfs and head in feet.
(d) According to USBR tests:
u
e
h
C 3.22 0.44
P
= + (16)
n cfs and head in feet.
through 16 will give very similar results
mall, and often negligible
lationships were developed 100 years ago
For weirs with L/B < 1 (unsuppressed weirs)
for K
H
= 0.003 ft and K
L
= 0, with Q i
It is seen that Eqs. 13
Note also that K
L
is either zero or very s
You can see that some of the above re
se
tio L/B can be found in figures (see
Equations 10 - 12 still apply in this ca
The contraction effect is to decrease the magnitude of the coefficient, C
e
The relationship of C
e
to the constriction ra
below) presented by Kindsvater and Carter (1957)
The K
H
values remain the same (but multiply the respective K
H
values in Eqs. 13
- 16 by 0.3048 to use meters instead of feet)
K
L
values can also be determined graphically (see below)
Sharp-crested, rectangular weirs, English units:
3.4 3.4
3.6 3.6 C
e
3.8 3.8
4.0 4.0
4.2 4.2
0.010 0.010
-0.005 -0.005
0.000 0.000
0.005 0.005
0.015 0.015
3.2 3.2
3.0 3.0
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
h /
0 0.4 0.2 0.8 0.6 1.0
P
u
K (ft)
L
/B
=
1
.0
L
/B
=
0
.9
L
L/B = 0.2
L/B = 0.4
L/B = 0.6
2.0 2.4
L
/B
=
0
.8
L/B
h in ft, Q in cfs
u
BIE 5300/6300 Lectures 69 Gary P. Merkley
Sharp-crested, unsuppressed, rectangular weirs, metric units:
0.5
0.005 0.005
0.004
0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
0.004
0.003 0.003
0.002
0.001
L
L/B
0.000
-0.001
-0.002
sion occurs at L/B = 1
0.002
K (m)
0.001
0.000
-0.001
-0.002
Note: suppres
Sharp-crested, unsuppressed, rectangular weirs, metric units:
2.30 2.30
0.0 0.2 0.4
L/B = 0.2
0.6 0.8 1.0
L
/
B
=
1
.
0
L
/
B
=
0
.
9
L
/B
=
0
.8
L/B
=
0
.7
L/B =
0.6
L/B =
L/B = 0.4
0.5
L/B = 0.3
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4
h /P
u
1.
.
0
1.85
1.90 1.90
1.95 1.95
2.00 2.00
2.05
C
e
2.10 2.10
2.15 2.15
2. 2.20 20
2.25 2.25
70 1.70
1 1.75 75
1.80 1.8
1.85
2.05
h in m, Q in m /s
3
u
Gary P. Merkley 70 BIE 5300/6300 Lectures
Observe that the abscissa scale in the above graph for C
e
goes up to a maximum
of h
u
/P = 2.4, which exceeds the recommended maximum of 0.333, as discussed
previously in this lecture
e allows for h
u
/P > 0.333 Nevertheless, the above calibration procedur
B for Rectangular Weirs in Non-rectangular Sections
Note that rectangular-notch weirs in non-rectangular channel sections are always
unsuppressed
When applying the above calibrations to rectangular weirs in non-rectangular
channel sections, let B equal the width of the upstream cross-section at the
elevation of the weir crest
Equations Instead of Graphs
It may be more convenient to approximate the above graphical solutions for K
L
and C
e
by equations when applying the relationships on a computer or calculator
function fits the C
e
lines in the above graph (in metric units):
A rational
= +
u
e ce c
h
C
P
e
where C
e
is for Q in m
3
/s, and,
(17)
= +
ce
L
1.724 0.04789
B
(18)
and,
+
=
+
ce
2
L
0.00470432 0.030365
B
L L
1 1.76542 0.879917
B B
(19)
A combination of a straight line and a polynomial approximates the K
L
curve, for
K
L
in meters:
For 0 L/B 0.35:
= +
L
L
K 0.002298 0.00048
B
(20)
For 0.35 < L/B 1.00:
BIE 5300/6300 Lectures 71 Gary P. Merkley
= +
+
4 3
L
L L
K 0.10609 0.1922 0.11417
B B
L
0.028182 0.00006
B
2
L
B
Re e
indsvater and Carter (1957)
(21)
where K
L
is in meters
fer nces & Bibliography
K
Gary P. Merkley 72 BIE 5300/6300 Lectures