0% found this document useful (0 votes)
185 views8 pages

Static Games With Incomplete Information

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 8

3.

Static games of incomplete information


3.1 Bayesian games
A static bayesian game is a simultaneous-move game with
incomplete information.
Example 1: Assume it is common knowledge that two players, P1
and P2, play the prisoners dilemma with probability 2/3 and a
dierent game with probability 1/3:
P2
C D
P1
C
D
4, 4 0, 5
5, 0 1, 1
P2
C D
P1
C
D
10, 10 0, 5
5, 0 1, 1
It is also common knowledge that player 1 observes the move of
nature (that is, distinguishes which game they are playing)
Write the extensive form representation of the game.
Denition: The normal-form representation of an n-player static
bayesian game is
(A
1
, A
2
, . . . , A
n
; T
1
, T
2
, . . . , T
n
; p
1
, p
2
, . . . , p
n
; u
1
, u
2
, . . . , u
n
)
where
A
i
is the action space of player i .
T
i
is the type space of player i (player i s type, t
i
, is privately
known by player i ).
p
i
are the beliefs of player i : p
i
(t
i
|t
i
) describes i s uncertainty
about the n 1 other players, given i s own type t
i
.
Player i s payo function is u
i
(a
1
, a
2
, . . . , a
n
; t
1
, t
2
, . . . , t
n
).
The timing of the game is:
1. Nature draws a type vector (t
1
, t
2
, . . . , t
n
), where t
i
T
i
,
according to the prior probability distribution p(t).
2. Nature reveals t
i
to player i .
3. Players simultaneously choose actions: player i chooses a
i
A
i
.
4. Payos u
i
(a
1
, a
2
, . . . , a
n
; t
1
, t
2
, . . . , t
n
) are received.
When nature reveals t
i
to player i , he or she can compute the
belief p
i
(t
i
|t
i
) using Bayes rule:
p
i
(t
i
|t
i
) =
p(t
i
, t
i
)
p(t
i
)
=
p(t
i
, t
i
)

t
i
T
i
p(t
i
, t
i
)
.
When players types are independent, p
i
(t
i
|t
i
) does not depend
on t
i
but is still derived from the prior distribution p(t).
Describe the elements in the normal form of Example 1.
3.2 Bayesian Nash equilibrium
Denition: In the static Bayesian game
(A
1
, A
2
, . . . , A
n
; T
1
, T
2
, . . . , T
n
; p
1
, p
2
, . . . , p
n
; u
1
, u
2
, . . . , u
n
),
a strategy of player i is a function s
i
(t
i
) that species an action
from A
i
for each possible type t
i
T
i
.
In a separating strategy, each type chooses a dierent action.
In a pooling strategy, all types choose the same action.
Find the strategies of each player in Example 1.
In a Bayesian equilibrium, each players strategy must be a best
response (in expectation) to the other players strategies.
Denition: In a static Bayesian game
G = (A
1
, A
2
, . . . , A
n
; T
1
, T
2
, . . . , T
n
; p
1
, p
2
, . . . , p
n
; u
1
, u
2
, . . . , u
n
),
the strategies s

= (s

1
, s

2
, . . . , s

n
) form a (pure-strategy) Bayesian
Nash equilibrium if for each player i and for each of i s types
t
i
T
i
, s

i
(t
i
) solves
max
a
i
A
i

t
i
T
i
p
i
(t
i
|t
i
)u
i
(s

1
(t
1
), . . . , s

i 1
(t
i 1
), a
i
, s

i +1
(t
i +1
), . . . , s

n
(t
n
)).
That is, no player wants to change his or her strategy, even if the
change involves only one action by one type.
In a nite game (N, A
i
and T
i
nite sets), there always exists a
Bayesian Nash equilibrium, perhaps in mixed strategies.
Bayesian Nash equilibria of Example 1:
If s

2
= D, R
1
(D) = (D, D)
If s

1
= (D, D), R
2
(D, D) = D

[(D, D), D] is BNEQ


If s

2
= C, R
1
(C) = (D, C)
If s

1
= (D, C), R
2
(D, C) = C

[(D, C), C] is BNEQ


Also, by means of the expected-payo bimatrix:
J2
D C
J1
(D, D)
(D, C)
(C, D)
(D, D)
1, 1 5, 0
2/3, 7/3 20/3, 10/3
1/3, 11/3 13/3, 8/3
0, 5 6, 6
Example 2: Firm F1 decides whether to build a new plant or not,
and rm F2 simultaneously decides if entering and compete with
F1 or not. Depending on whether the building costs of the plant is
3 o 0, the payos are:
F2
E NoE
F1
B
NoB
0, -1 2, 0
2, 1 3, 0
F2
E NoE
F1
B
NoB
3, -1 5, 0
2, 1 3, 0
Let us assume p
1
is the probability F2 assigns to high cost of
building.
(NoB, B) is a dominant strategy for F1.
Given that strategy of F1, Enter is the best response for F2 if
p
1
> 1/2 and Not Enter is its best response if p
1
< 1/2.
Example 2: Now the low cost is 1.5.
F2
E NoE
F1
B
NoB
0, -1 2, 0
2, 1 3, 0
F2
E NoE
F1
B
NoB
1.5, -1 3.5, 0
2, 1 3, 0
The expected-payo matrix, depending on p
1
, is:
F2
E NoE
F1
(B, B)
(B, NoB)
(NoB, B)
(NoB, NoB)
1.5(1 p
1
), -1 3.5-1.5p
1
, 0
2(1 p
1
), 1-2p
1
3 p
1
, 0
1.5+0.5p
1
, 2p
1
1 3.5-0.5p
1
, 0
2, 1 3, 0
[(NoB, NoB), E] is BNEQ for all p
1
.
[(NoB, B), NoE] es BNEQ if and only if p
1

1
2
.

You might also like