CHAPTER 16: Treatment of Aliens: Failure of Protection or Redress
This document summarizes international law regarding the treatment of aliens and the doctrine of state responsibility. Some key points:
1) States have sovereignty over their territory and the right to determine which foreigners may enter, but must treat those they accept justly according to international law.
2) States are responsible for injuries against foreigners caused by the state or those it fails to protect against or provide redress for.
3) For a foreigner to receive diplomatic protection from their state, they must first exhaust all available local remedies before their state can intervene on their behalf.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
170 views8 pages
CHAPTER 16: Treatment of Aliens: Failure of Protection or Redress
This document summarizes international law regarding the treatment of aliens and the doctrine of state responsibility. Some key points:
1) States have sovereignty over their territory and the right to determine which foreigners may enter, but must treat those they accept justly according to international law.
2) States are responsible for injuries against foreigners caused by the state or those it fails to protect against or provide redress for.
3) For a foreigner to receive diplomatic protection from their state, they must first exhaust all available local remedies before their state can intervene on their behalf.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8
PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW (Cruz)
CHAPTER 16: Treatment of Aliens
* every state has the right, as inherent in sovereignty and essential to its own security and existence, to determine in what cases and under what conditions foreigners may be admitted to its territory * once it decides to accept them, its competence as territorial soveriegn as limited by the requirement that they be treated justly, in accordance with the law of nations * the alien canot as a rule claim a preferred position vis- a-vis the national of the state where he is at best only a guest * the foreigner may not enjoy the right to vote, to run for public office, to exploit natural resources or to engage in certain businesses regarded as vital to the interests of the local state * the foreigner must accept the institutions of the local state * state is not an insurerof the life or property of the alien, whe he is within its territory * the foreigner is expected to take the customary precautions for the protection of his own rights and to avail himself of the usual remedies when these rights are violated THE DOCTRINE OF STATE RESPONSIBILITY * instances when an alien can claim a more favored position than the national of the local state and hold the state liable for injuries committed against him while within its territory * a state may be held responsible for: a. international deliquency b. directly or indirectly imputable to it c. which causes injury to the natonal of another state * liabilty will attach to the state where its treatment of alien falls below the international standard of justice or wgere it remiss in according him the protection or redress that is warranted by the circumstances * !"#$%&": assure the traveler that when his rights are violated in a foreign state, he will not be denied any remedy simply because he is not one of its nationals * encourage more intercourse among the peoples of the world through inter-visitation of their respective countries THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD OF !STICE * 'tandard of th reasonable state, that is, as referring to the ordinary normsof official conduct observed in civili(ed jurisdictions. * )&#$*%"+ & +,!-.%$/ & $*+-$0+"$ 1 where the laws of state fall below the international standard of justice, it is no defense that they are applicable not inly to aliens but as well, and equally, to the nationals of that state. $he relations of that state with ots own nationals are purely municipal2 international law is involved in its relations with the nationals of other states. FAIL!RE OF PROTECTION OR REDRESS * state may be held liable if it does not make reasonable efforts to prevent injury to the alien or, having done so unsuccesfully, fails to repair such injury. * degree of diligence required * responsibility does not immediately attach to the state upon a showing of a failure to prevent or redress an injury to aliens * distinction must be made between direct and inirect state responsibility a. where the imternational delinquency was committed by superior government officials or organs, liability will attach immediately as their acts may not be effectively prevented or reversed under the constitution and laws of the state b. where the offense is committed by inferior government officials or, more so, by private individuals, the state will be held liable only if, by reason of its indifferencein preventing or pushing it, it can be considered to have conived in effect in its commission E"HA!STION OF LOCAL RE#EDIES * the liability of the state for an international delinquency, its enforcemnet cannot be claimed by the injured foreigner unless, he first exhausts all available local remedies for the protection or vindication of his rights * state must be given an opportunity to do justice in its own regular way and without unwarranted interference with its sovereignty by other states * this requirement may be dispensed with, however, if there are no remedies to exhaust, as where the laws are intrinsically defective or there is laxity or arbitrariness in their enforcement or where the courts are corrupt or where there is no adeqaute machinery for the administration of justice * there would be "& remedy available from 3acts of state4 which are not subject to judicial review RESORT TO DIPLO#ATIC PROTECTION * if the injured foreigner has exhausted all the local remedies but without success, he may then avail himself of the assistance of his states 1 but only if he has a state. &therwise, he will have no party to represent him, and he by himself, being a mere individual, cannot institute his claim in his own name. * any injury to an alien is a violation not of his own personal rght but of the right of his state to hacve its nationals protected but of the right of his state to have its nationals protected whenever they are in a foreign country * where the injured alien is stateless, his case will be one of )-""!0 -5',!+ %"6!*%- and cannot be subject of diplomatic protection * tie of nationality 1 required to exist from the time of the injury until the time the international claim is finally settled. &nce the tie is broken, the claim itselfis deemed BETIA. MENOR. REAMICO | 2014 PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW (Cruz) automatically abated. %f, the injured national dies while the claim is under consideration and it should happen that his hers are not nationals of the claimant state, the calim will lapse ENFORCE#ENT OF CLAI# * an international claim for damages may be resolved through negotiation or, if this fails, any of the other methods of settling disputes * in the event that the responsibility of the state is established or acknowledged, the duty to make reaparation will arise. 'uch reparation may take the form of *+'$%$!$%&" or '-$%'-#$%&" or #&07+"'-$%&". A$OIDANCE OF STATE RESPONSIBILITY * to avoid the intervention of the alien8s state in contracts, the local state sometimes incorporates therein what is known as the #-.9& #.-!'+ * #alvo #lause 1 stipulation by which the alien waives or restricts his right to appeal to his own state in connection with any claim arising from the contract and agrees to limit himself to the remedies available under the laws of the local state. * calvo clause may be enforced as a lawful condition of the contract. :owever, may not be interpreted to deprive the alien8s state of the right to protect or vindicate his interests in case they are injured in another state as such waiver can legally be made not by him but by his own state E"CL!SION OF ALIENS * the state may also avoid liability to aliens by refusing their admission, but this is not regarded as sound policy since it would provoke retaliation in kind and ultimately isolate its nationals from the rest of the international community * )+7&*$-$%&": the removal of an alien out of the country, simply because his presence is deemed inconsistent with the public welfare and without any punishment being imposed or contemplated, either under the laws of the country out of which he is sent, or under those of the country to which he is taken * +;#.!'%&": denial of entry to an alien DEPORTATION E"TRADITION !nilateral act if the local state +ffected at the request of the state of origin 5ased on causes arising in the local state 5ased on offenses generally committed in the state of origin !ndesirable alien may be deported to a state other than his own or the state of origin #alls for the return of the fugitive to the state of origin Basis of E%tra&ition * $he extradition of a person is required only if there is a treaty between the state of refuge and the state of origin * in the absence of a treaty 1 local state has every right to grant asylum to the fugitive and to refuse to deliver him back to the latter state even if he is a national F'n&amental Prin(i)les of E%tra&tition <. extradition is based on the consent of the state of asylum =. 7rinciple of specialty 1 a fugitive who is extradited may be tried only for the crime specified in the request for extradition and included in the list of offenses in the extradition treaty >. any person may be extradited ?. political and religious offenders are generally not subject to extradition @. in the absence of a special agreement, the offense must have been committed within the territory or against the interests of the demanding state A. *ule of double criminality - the act for which the extradition is sought must be punishable in both the requesting and requested states Pro(e&'re of E%tra&ition * if the surrender of a fugitive is sought, a request for his extradition is presented through diplomatic channels to the state of refuge * this request will be accompanied by the necessary papers relative to the identity of the wanted person and the crime he is alleged to have committed or of which he has already been convicted * upon receipt of request, the state of refuge will conduct a judicial investigation to ascertain if the crime is covered by the extradition treaty and if there is a prima facie case against the fugitive according to its own laws CHAPTER 1+ SETTLE#ENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISP!TES * )%'7!$+ 1 exists when one state claims that another state should have behave in a certain manner and that claim is rejected by the latter * actual disagreement between states regarding the conduct to be taken by one of them for the protection or vindication of the interests of the other * '%$!-$%&" 1 initial stage of a dispute * )ispute is .+B-. 1 involves a justiciable rights based on law or fact susceptible of adjudication by a judicial or arbitral tribunal. * )ispute is 7&.%$%#-. 1 if it cannot be decided by legal processes on the basis of the substantive rules of international law because the differences of the parties spring from animosities in their mutual attitudes rather than from an antagonism of legal rights * the solution to such a disputes lies not in the councils of the courts but in the corridors of diplomacy #et,o&s of settlin- &is)'tes BETIA. MENOR. REAMICO | 2014 PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW (Cruz) * disputes are required to be settled, conformably to one of the basic principle of the !", 3by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice are not endangered Ami(a.le #et,o&s <. "egotiation 1 generally the first step taken in the settlement of an international dispute is the discussion undertaken by the parties themselves of their respective claims and counterclaims with a view to their just and orderly adjustment. * where the talks prosper and agreement is reached, it is usually formali(ed in a treaty or more directly effected through the rectification of the injury caused to the claimant state =. %nquiry 1 investigation of the points in question, on the theory that their education will contribute to the solution of the differences between the parties. >. Bood &ffices 1 method by which a third party attempts to bring the disputing states together in order to enable them to discuss the issues in contention and arrive at an agreement ?. 0ediation 1 third party does not merely provide the opportunity for the antagonists to negotiate but also actively participates in their discussions in order to reconcile their conflicting claims and appease their feelings of resentment @. #onciliation 1 active participation of a third party in the attempt of the disputants to settle their conflict, and the recommendations made by it are likewise not binding. A. -rbitration 1 solution of a dispute by an impartial third party, usually a tribunal created by the parties themselves under a charter known as the #&07*&0%' C. 6udicial 'ettlement 1 the nature of its proceedings and the binding character of the decisions but also in the fact that the disputes submitted for adjudication are legal rather than political ARBITRATION !DICIAL SETTLE#ENT -rbitral tribunal is an ad hoc body created and filled by the parties to the dispute themselves 6udicial tribunal is a pre- existing and permanent body 'ubmission to arbitration is voluntary 6urisdiction - compulsary -rbitration proceedings - limited $he law applied by the tribunal in judicial settlement is independent of the will of the parties * the jurisdiction of the court is not compulsory but dependent on the agreement of the parties to submit to and be bound by its decisions. 'uch consent may be manifested in a treaty containing what is called the 3compromissary clause4 D. -#$%&" 5/ *+B%&"-. &*B-"%E-$%&"' 1 resorted to by the parties at their own volition or taken by the body itself at its own instance if allowed by agreement of the members Hostile #et,o&s <. %"$+*9+"$%&" =. *+$&*'%&"' 1 retaliation where the acts complained of do not constitute a legal ground of offense but are rather in the nature of unfriendly acts but indirectly hurtful to other states >. *+7*%'-.' 1 act of self-help on the part of the injured state, responding after an unsatisfied demand to act contrary to international law on the part of the offending state *they aim to impose on the offending state reparation for the offense or the return to legality in avoidance of new offenses *#ommon forms of reprisals <. display of force =. occupation of territory >. pacific blockade T,e !nite& Nations * !nited nations may be asked or may decide on its own authority to take a hand in its settlement. * the security council shall have the jurisdiction to intervene in2 a. all disputes affecting international peace and security b. all disputes which, have been submitted to it by the parties for settlement * such disputes may be brought to it by: a. the security council, on its own motion b. the general assembly c. any member of the united nations d. the secretary general e. any party to the dispute, provided that in the case of non-members of the !", they should accept in advance, for the purposes of the dispute, the obligations of pacific settlement under the #harter $he 'ecurity #ouncil may recommend appropriate measures or methods of adjustment, taking into consideration: a. -ny amicable measures already adopted by the parties b. $hat legal disputes should as a rule be referred to the %nternational #ourt of 6ustice *Fhere the terms of settlement are rejected by the parties, the 'ecurity #ouncil is empowered to take more drastic steps a. 7*+9+"$%9+ -#$%&" 1 it may adopt such measures not involving the use of armed force b. +"&*#+0+"$ -#$%&" CHAPTER 1/ 0AR *F-* 1 armed contention between the public forces of BETIA. MENOR. REAMICO | 2014 PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW (Cruz) states or other belligerent communities, implying the employment of violence among the parties as a means of enforcing their respective demands upon each other * Far may exist even without the use of force O'tla1r2 of 1ar * war was originally accepted as a legitimate means of a compulsion, that it was a reaction to an international delict * in only = instances is the use of force allowed: <. exercise of the inherent right of self-defense =. enforcement action Ho1 are t,e a-reements enfor(e&3 *the commonly accepted sanctions are: a. protest lodged by one belligerent, usually accompanied or followed by an appeal b reparation for damages is cause by the defeated belligerent c. punishment of war criminals Commen(ement of 1ar * Far is supposed to commence on the date specified in the declaration or on the date it is communicated to the enemy * formality is often not observed as evidenced by the number of wars that have broken out without the 3previous and explicit warning4 required * commence from the moment of the first act of force committed by one state with the intent of making war or committed without such intent but considered by the other state as constituting war Effe(ts of t,e O't.rea4 of 0ar <. the laws of peace cease to regulate the relations of the belligerent and are superseded by the laws of war =. diplomatic and consular relations between the belligerents are terminated and their respective representatives are allowed to return to their own countries >. treaties of a political nature are automatically cancelled, but those which are precisely intended to operate during war are activated ?. individuals are impressed with enemy character a. nationality test 1 if they are nationals of the other belligerent wherever they may be b. domiciliary test 1 if they are domiciled aliens in the territory of the other belligerent, on the assumption that they contribute to its economic resources c. activities test 1 if being foreigners they are nevertheless participate in the hostilities in favour of the other belligerent *corporations and other juridical persons are regarded as enemies if a majority or a substantial portion of their capital stock is in the hands of enemy national or if they have incorporated in the territory or uner the laws of the other belligerent @. enemy public property found in the territory of the other belligerent at the outbreak of hostilities is subject to confiscation Com.atants an& non5(om.atants *#ombatants 1 those who engage directly in the hostilities2 may lawfully wage war and are thus subject to direct attack from the enemy *"on-#ombatants 1 those who do not engage directly in the hostilities2 should not be subjected to attack as they are not supposed to participate in the actual fighting * $he following are regarded as combatants: <. members of the armed forces =. irregular forces a. they are commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates b. they wear a fixed and distinctive sign recogni(able at a distance c. they carry arms openly d. they conduct their operations in accordance with laws and customs of war >. levee en masse 1 the inhabitants of unoccupied territory who, on the approach of the enemy, spontaneously take arms to resist the invading troops without having had time to organi(e themselves ?. officers and crew of merchant vessels who forcibly resist attack Con&'(t of Hostilities * three basic principles underlie the rule of warfare <. principle of military necessity 1 employ any amount and kind of force to compel the complete submission of the enemy with the least possible loss of lives, time and money =. principle of humanity 1 use of any measure that is not absolutely necessary for the purposes of war >. principle of chivalry 1 those that require the belligerents to give proper warning before launching a bombardment or prohibit the use of perfidy in the conduct of the hostilities * an individual can only be considered a spy if, acting clandestinely or under false pretenses, he obtains or seeks to obtain information in the (one of operations if a belligerent *spies are subject to the municipal law of the other belligerent * a spy taken in the act cannot be punished without previous trial 6in&s of 0arfare * warfare may be waged on .-") or '+- or in the -%*, separately or simultaneously * most of the rules on aerial warfare have become obsolete and need to be revised to make them conform to present realities * as for naval warfare, the most serious difficulties lie in th BETIA. MENOR. REAMICO | 2014 PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW (Cruz) disagreement among states as to whether armed merchant vessels are subject to direct attack *one important rule is that booty or personal property found in the battlefield is subject to confiscation by the belligerent occupation except only the personal belongings of the individual combatants which have no military value. $:+-$*+ & F-*: place where the hostilities are actually conducted *+B%&" & F-*: greater area where the belligerents may lawfully engage each other Belli-erent O((')ation * territory is deemed occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army, but this occupation is limited only to the area where such authority has been established and can be effectively exercised. %t is not necessary that every square foot of the territory in question be actually occupied * 5elligerent occupation does not result in transfer or suspension of the sovereignty of the legitimate government although it may at the moment be unable to exercise it. $he belligerent occupant cannot perform such acts as declaring the independence of the occupied territory or requiring its inhabitants to renounce their allegiance to the lawful government * the belligerent is required to restore and ensure public order and safety while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country. * the belligerent occupant may promulgate new laws, non-political as well as political, provided they do not contravene the general accepted principles of international law. $he political laws are automatically abrogated upon the end of the occupation but the non- political laws may continue even beyond the occupation unless they are expressly repealed or modified by the legitimate government * it is permitted for the belligerent occupant to introduce military currency, provided the purpose is not to debase the countryGs economy * private property cannot be confiscated, but those susceptible of military use may be sei(ed, subject to restoration or compensation when peace is made * the property of municipalities and of institutions dedicated to religion, charity and education, and the arts and sciences, even when state owned, shall be treated as private property and their destruction is expressly forbidden * the army of occupation can only take possession of cash, funds and reali(able securities which are strictly the property of the state, depots of arms, means of transport, stores and supplies, and generally movable property belonging to the state which may be used for military operations *the occupying state shall be regarded only as administrator and usufructuary of public buildings, real estate, forest, agricultural estates belonging to the hostile state and situated in the occupied territory Postlimini'm * persons or things taken by the enemy are restored to the former state on coming actually into the power of the nation to which they belong * 6!' 7&'$.%0%"%!0 1 reinstatement of the authority of the displaced government once control of the enemy is lost over the territory affected * upon the end of a belligerent occupation, the laws of the re-established government are revived and all acts taken by the belligerent occupant which it could not legally do under the law of nations, as well as lawful acts of a political complexion, are invalidated Non5Hostile Inter(o'rse FLA7 OF TR!CE 8 white flag carried by an individual authori(ed by one belligerent to enter into communication with the other CARTELS 8 agreements to regulate intercourse during war on matters as postal and telegraphic communication PASSPORT 8 written permission given by the belligerent government or its authori(ed agent subjects of the enemy state to travel generally in belligerent territory SAFE5COND!CT 8 pass given to an enemy subject or to an enemy vessel allowing passage between defined points SAFE7!ARD 8 protection granted by a commanding officer either to enemy persons or property within his command LICENSE OF TRADE 8 permission given by the competent authority to individuals to carry on trade even though there is a state of war S's)ension of Hostilities * S!SPENSION OF AR#S 8 temporary cessation of the hostilities by arrangement of the local commanders for such purposes as the gathering of the wounded and the burial of the dead. * AR#ISTICE 8 suspension of all hostilities within a certain area or in the entire region of war agreed upon by the belligerent governments usually for the purpose of arranging the terms of the peace AR#ISTICE S!SPENSION OF AR#S 7urpose: political 7urpose: military 0ay be concluded by the commanders-in-chief 0ay be agreed upon by the local commanders !sually in writing 0ay be oral * CEASEFIRE 8 unconditional stoppage of hostilities by order of an international body * TR!CE 8 regarded as ceasefire with conditions attached * CAPIT!LATION 8 surrender of military forces, places or districts in accordance with the rules of military honor Termination of 1ar <. cessation of hostilities BETIA. MENOR. REAMICO | 2014 PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW (Cruz) =. conclusion of a negotiated treaty of peace >. defeat of one of the belligerents followed by a dictated treaty of peace * 7rinciple of uti possidetis 1 property or territory in the possession of the respective belligerents upon the termination of the war is retained by them * 'tatus quo ante 1 calls for the complete restoration to their former owners of property or territory that may have changed hands during the hostilities, with the exception only of pri(e and booty * war is supposed to end with the re-establishment of peace but the precise date is not easily fixed in view of the different methods of terminating the state of hostilities Aftermat, of 0ar * one of the inevitable consequences of war s the implied judgment, right or wrong, that the vanquished belligerent is the guilty party in the dispute that caused the hostilities. * treaty of peace imposed by the victor upon the defeated state is regarded as a punishment as is sustained on the ground although marked by the vice of duress that normally would invalidate other agreements *nationals of the vanquished state may be protected and punished as war criminals and for other violations of international law. $hey may not escape responsibility on the ground that they were merely acting on orders of their state CHAPTER 19 NE!TRALITY * - state is said to be neutral if it does not take part, directly or indirectly, in a war between other states. Ne'tralit2 an& Ne'trali:ation * neutrality 1 dependent solely on the attitude of the neutral state, which is free to join any of the belligerents any time it sees fit * governed by the law of nations *obtains only during war * neutrali(ation 1 result of a treaty wherein the duration and the other conditions of the neutrali(ation are agreed upon by the neutrali(ed state and other powers * this agreement governs the conduct of signatories * intended to operate in time of peace as well as in time of war *&nly states may become neutral but portions of states may be neutrali(ed La1s of Ne'tralit2 a. *elations of the belligerent states with the neutral state b. *elations of the belligerent states with the nationals of the neutral state Relations of .elli-erent States an& Ne'tral States * a neutral state has the right and duty to abstain from taking part in the hostilities and from giving assistance to either belligerent2 prevent its territory and other resources from being used in the conduct of hostilities by the belligerents, and to acquiesce in certain restrictions and limitations that the belligerent may find necessary to impose, especially in connection with international commerce * belligerents are bound to respect the status of the neutral state !se of Ne'tral Territories * neutral territory is inviolable and cannot be used by the belligerents for the movement of troops and the undertaking of military operations in general * use of neutral territory is not completely barred to the belligerents Hexample: passage of sick and wounded troopsI * neutral state may give refuge to troops from the belligerent forces * escaped prisoners of war need not be detained by the neutral state but must be assigned a place of residence if they are allowed to remain *warships may not enter neutral ports, roadsteads and harbours except only in cases of unseaworthiness. $he usual duration of the sojourn is =? hours but this may be shortened or extended, depending on the reason for the entry. $hus, the vessel must leave as soon as it has been re-provisioned *Beneral rule: repairs in their territory of damage sustained by a warship in battle 1 permitted so long as they are not intended to increase the fighting force of the vessel. *not more than > vessels from any belligerent shall be allowed simultaneously in the same neutral port or waters * territorial waters of a neutral state must never be used as asylum for belligerent vessels under pursuit or attack by the enemy * passage of military aircraft belonging to the belligerents is not allowed across the airspace of a neutral state. *where a belligerent aircraft is forced to land on neutral territory, the same should be detained and its officers and crew interned !se of Ne'tral Fa(ilities an& Ser;i(es * it is prohibited from giving belligerents any form of direct assistance in connection with the conduct of hostilities. * neutral state may not send military contingents, extend loans or even sell for valuable consideration, supplies of war to either or both of the belligerents * neutral state is not obliged to prevent the export from or transit through its territory of war supplies purchased from private traders by the belligerents in the ordinary course of commerce, it is required to take reasonable diligence in preventing the delivery of vessels constructed and armed in its territory for use by any of the belligerents BETIA. MENOR. REAMICO | 2014 PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW (Cruz) Relations of Belli-erent States 1it, Nationals of Ne'tral states * neutral states enact legislation to avoid their involvement in foreign wars as a results of the acts of their nationals * neutral states are free to allow their nationals to deal, in their private capacity, with any of the belligerents * international law considers the relationship as strictly between the individual and the belligerent states and whatever hardships may be suffered by its nationals as a result thereof must, as a rule, be acquiesced in by the neutral state $isit an& Sear(, * belligerent warships and aircraft have the right to visit and search neutral merchant vessels on the high seas for the purpose of determining whether they are in any way connected with the hostilities * the vessels may be captured as pri(e if they are engaged in hostile activities, if they resist to visit and search, or if there is reasonable suspicion that they are liable to confiscation * the cargo of these vessels may also be captured under certain conditions, as when they are contraband *7ri(e is not confiscated summarily but must be brought to a pri(e court for adjudication *7*%E+ #&!*$ 1 is a tribunal established by a belligerent under its own laws, and applies rules of international law in the absence of special municipal legislation. Contra.an& * contraband 1 term applied to goods which, although neutral property, may be sei(ed by a belligerent because they are useful for war and are bound for a hostile destination * -5'&.!$+ #&"$*-5-") 1 necessarily useful for war under all circumstances * subject to sei(ure so long as they are bound for enemy or enemy-held territory * #&")%$%&"-. #&"$*-5-") 1 both civilian and military purposes *may be sei(ed only when it can be shown that they are destined for the armed forces or the authorities of the belligerent government * *++ .%'$ 1 includes goods useful for war and bound for the belligerents but exempted from the law on contraband for humanitarian reasons * )&#$*%"+ & !.$%0-$+ #&"'!07$%&" 1 goods intended for civilian use which may ultimately find their way to and be consumed by the belligerent forces are also liable to sei(ure * contraband are subject to condemnation * )&#$*%"+ & %"+#$%&" 1 if they are shipped together with innocent goods belonging to the same owner2 the latter may also be confiscated * contraband are liable to capture from the time they leave the port in which they are loaded and until they reach their final hostile destination * )&#$*%"+ & !.$%0-$+ )+'$%"-$%&" 1 liability of the contraband to capture is determined not by their ostensible but by their real destination * even if the vessel intends to stop at an intermediate neutral port, it will still be considered as in one continuous voyage provided it can be shown that its cargo will ultimately be delivered to a hostile destination * )&#$*%"+ & #&"$%"!&!' 9&/-B+ 1 when the goods are reloaded at the intermediate port on the same vessel * )&#$*%"+ & #&"$%"!&!' $*-"'7&*$ 1 when they are reloaded on another vessel or other form of transportation Blo(4a&e *5lockade 1 hostile operation by means of which the vessels and aircraft of one belligerent prevent all other vessels, including those of neutral states, from entering or leaving the ports or coasts of other belligerent, the purpose being to shut off the place from international commerce and communication with other states *7acific blockade 1 applies only to the vessels of blockaded state and does not affect the vessels of other states **equisites of blockade: a. binding 1 duly communicated to the neutral states b. effective 1 it is maintained by adequate force so as to make ingress to or egress from the port dangerous c. established by the proper authorities of the belligerent government d. limited only to the territory of the enemy and not extended to neutral places or international rivers e. impartially applied to all states alike * the liability of a neutral vessel to capture for breach of blockade is contingent on its knowledge, actual or presumptive of the blockade and continues as long as it is pursued by the ships of the blockading force after it has left or tried to enter the blockaded port !nne'tral Ser;i(e * consists of acts, of a more hostile character than carriage of contraband or breach of blockade, which are undertaken by merchant vessels of a neutral state in aid of any of the belligerents * a neutral vessel is liable to condemnation for unneutral service: <. if it is making a voyage special with a view to the transport of individual passengers who are embodied in the armed forces of the enemy or with a view to the transmission of information in the interest of the enemy2 &* =. if with the knowledge of the owner, or the one who charters the entire vessel, it is transporting military detachment of enemy or one or more persons who, during the voyage, lend direct assistance to the operations of the BETIA. MENOR. REAMICO | 2014 PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW (Cruz) enemy * a neutral vessel is also liable to condemnation and to be treated as a merchant vessel of the enemy: <. takes a direct part in the hostilities =. if it is under the orders or control of an agent placed on board by the enemy government >. chartered entirely by the enemy government ?. if it is at the same time and exclusively either devoted to the transport if enemy troops or the transmission of information An-ar2 * by the right of angary 1 a belligerent may, upon payment of just compensation, sei(e, use or destroy, in case of urgent necessity for purposes of offenses or defense, neutral property found in its territory, in enemy territory, or on the high seas * $:*++ *+,!%'%$+' <. that the property is under the control or jurisdiction of the belligerent =. thet there is urgent necessity for the taking >. that just compensation is paid to the owner Termination of Ne'tralit2 <. when the neutral state joins the war * neutral state will be governed by the laws of war in its relations with the other belligerents and by the laws of neutrality in its relations with all other states =. upon conclusion of peace *all states will again be governed by the laws of peace BETIA. MENOR. REAMICO | 2014