This document discusses the history of Somerset House, an architectural building in London. It describes the original design and construction of the building in the late 18th century, including details about its size, style, and decorations. It also mentions later additions and renovations to the building in the early 19th century and mid-19th century that expanded and modernized it. The building was subject to criticism during its construction but is now considered an important example of Neoclassical architecture in London.
This document discusses the history of Somerset House, an architectural building in London. It describes the original design and construction of the building in the late 18th century, including details about its size, style, and decorations. It also mentions later additions and renovations to the building in the early 19th century and mid-19th century that expanded and modernized it. The building was subject to criticism during its construction but is now considered an important example of Neoclassical architecture in London.
This document discusses the history of Somerset House, an architectural building in London. It describes the original design and construction of the building in the late 18th century, including details about its size, style, and decorations. It also mentions later additions and renovations to the building in the early 19th century and mid-19th century that expanded and modernized it. The building was subject to criticism during its construction but is now considered an important example of Neoclassical architecture in London.
This document discusses the history of Somerset House, an architectural building in London. It describes the original design and construction of the building in the late 18th century, including details about its size, style, and decorations. It also mentions later additions and renovations to the building in the early 19th century and mid-19th century that expanded and modernized it. The building was subject to criticism during its construction but is now considered an important example of Neoclassical architecture in London.
Imililing towards the ()ii a (bangle, is 200 ft. in extent, lieing niucli more tlian tlie length of that towards the Strand ; the .style, however, ot its deeorjtion is correspor.dent Avitli it, the prineijial variation being in the use of pilasters instead of columns, and in the doors and window.s. Tne front next the Thames is ornamented in a similar manner to tliat already ilescribed. It was originally intended that the extent of tlie terrace should have beeii 1,1 OJ ft. This last is sujiported by a lofty arcade, decorated towards the ends with coupled Tuscan columns, whose cornice is continued along the whole terrace. Tiie edifice was at the time the suliject of much severe criticism, and ])articularly from the pen of a silly en- graver of the name of Williams, under the name of Antony I'asquin ; but the censures he passed on it, the author being as innocent of tlie slightest knowledge of the art as most of tlic \vriting aicliitectuial critics of the present daj, were uitliout foundation, and have long fcmce been forgotten At the tune, however tliev rectned a ludicious reply from the pen of the late Mr. John \\^=^^^SWlik ll il \ deservedly found a place in our edition of the work by Sir W. Chambers, yet to be noticed 520. Malton, in his Loiidoti and fl'est- iniiiiter, fol. 1792-7, gives several care- fully drawn view.s of tliis noble edifice, tlie design of whidi he describes as be- ing at that time (1796), "far from complete, and little jirogress has been made in t!ie build- ing since the com- mencement of t! e present war ; the exigencies of go- vernment having <li- verted to other uses the sum of 25,OCO/. which for several years had been an- nually voted for its coniiniiance." Since 1.S 2^3 LNir.NO MST.LILL. .021U,.i.l HOUSE. j|,gt j,^,.;^^! ^|,g j.;^,^,. frontnge has been completed at the east end, by the additions in 18.31, under Sir II. Smirke, for King's College : while new offices were skilfcilly added on the western side, during tlie years 1852-56, by James Pennetiiorne. 521. In the y<car 1759, Sir W. Ciiambers published a Treatise on the Decorative Part of Civil Architecture, in tblio ; a second edition apjieared in 1768 ; and a third, with some ad- ditional i)lates, in 1791. Two others have since been published, in 1825. This work, as far as it goes, still continues to be a sort of text-book for the student ; and much of it has been adopted for that portion of this volume, entitled " I'ractice of Architecture " Cham- be^s held the office of surveyor-general in the Board of Works, and to him inuch is owing for the assistance he rendered in establishing the Royal Academy of Aits, in 1768, to wliicli institution I.e was treasurer. He died in 1796. He had many pupils, several of whom we shall name. 522. Robert IMylne, the descendant of a race of master masons and architects in Scot- land, designed Blackfriars Bridge, having been tlie successful competitor, a preference he obtained while yet unknown and abroad. It was built between the years 1760 and 1768, at an expense of 152,840/., a sum which was said to be somewhat less than his estimate. He was voted an annual salary of 300/. and a percentage on tlie money laid out ; but to obtain his commission of 5 per cent, he had a long struggle with the city authorities, his claims not being allowed until 1776. This bridge was pulled down in 1865. At the time when the designs were under consideration, a long controversy aro.se on the questions of tlie t.iste exhibited, and safety in employing elliptic, in place of semicircular, arches, which had been u)) to that time used in England for bridges. He was surveyor to the dean and chapter of St. Paul's, London, and is said to have placed in that building, over the entrance to the