Schur Inequality

Schur and related inequalities
MathLink Members
2 gennaio 2012
Sommario
This is a study of the classical Schurs Inequality (not Vornicu-Schur)
and its various forms and implications.
1 Schurs Inequality
Issai Schur (January 10, 1875 in Mogilev - January 10,
1941 in Tel Aviv) was a mathematician who worked in
Germany for most of his life. He studied at Berlin. He
obtained his doctorate in 1901, became lecturer in 1903
and, after a stay at Bonn, professor in 1919.
He considered himself German rather than Jewish,
even though he had been born in the Russian Empire
in what is now Belarus, and brought up partly in
Latvia. For this reason he declined invitations to leave
Germany for the United States and Britain in 1934.
Nevertheless he was dismissed from his chair in 1935 and, at the instigation of
Ludwig Bieberbach (who had previously sympathised with Schur regarding his
treatment at the hands of the Nazis), he was forced to resign from the Prussian
Academy in 1938. Schur eventually emigrated to Palestine in 1939, and lived
his nal years in poverty. He died in Tel Aviv on his 66th birthday.
As a student of Frobenius, he worked on group representations (the subject wi-
th which he is most closely associated), but also in combinatorics and number
theory and even theoretical physics. He is perhaps best known today for his
result on the existence of the Schur decomposition and for his work on group
representations (Schurs lemma).
Schur had a number of students, including Richard Brauer, B. H. Neumann,
Heinz Pr ufer, and Richard Rado. His lectures were very popular with students.
He was a foreign member of the Russian Academy of Sciences from 1929.
1
Here a proof of Schurs inequality with three variables a, b, c > 0.
Theorem 1. (Schur) For any n R, and for any a, b, c R
+
0
we have
a
n
(a b)(a c) + b
n
(b c)(b a) + c
n
(c a)(c b) 0
with equality i a = b = c or a = 0, b = c or b = 0, a = c or c = 0, a = b.
Note that in the case abc = 0, there is the restriction n = 0.
Proof. Since the inequality is symmetric, it can be assumed without loss of
generality that a b c. Rewrite
a
n
(a b)(a c) = [a
n
(a c) b
n
(b c)] + c
n
(c a)(c b)
Using the ordering assumption, a b we have a
n
b
n
and a c b c, so
a
n
(a c) b
n
(b c) 0. Clearly a c, b b implies c
n
(c a)(c b) 0.
2 Alternative forms of Schurs Inequality
Assuming a, b, c > 0 we have the following results:
Result 1. n = 0 is equivalent to the well-known
a
2
+ b
2
+ c
2
ab + bc + ca
which actually holds a, b, c R.
Result 2. n = 1 expanded is
a
3
+ b
3
+ c
3
+ 3abc a
2
b + b
2
c + c
2
a + ab
2
+ bc
2
+ ca
2
.
Result 3. n = 1 is equivalent to
abc (a + b + c)(a b + c)(a + b c).
Result 4. n = 1 is equivalent to
(a + b + c)
2
+
9abc
a + b + c
4(ab + bc + ca).
Result 5. Eulers Inequality states that if the circumradius of a trangle is
R and the inradius is r, then R 2r. If this is expressed in terms of the sides
a, b, c, we get
abc
(a + b + c)(a + b + c)(a b + c)(a + b c)
(a + b + c)(a b + c)(a + b c)
a + b + c
2
which is equivalent to
abc (a + b + c)(a b + c)(a + b c)
Result 6. Gerretsens Inequality states that if s, r, R denotes the semipe-
rimeter, inradius and circumradius of a triangle, then
16Rr 5r
2
s
2
4R
2
+ 4Rr + r
2
.
By Ravi Transformation, we have
s
2
16Rr + 5r
2
0
x(x y)(x z) 0
and
4R
2
+ 4Rr + 3r
2
s
2
0
x
4
(y z)
2
+ 2
p(p q)(p r) 0
where

a = x + y
b = y + z
c = z + x
2x = a b + c
2y = a + b c
2z = a + b + c
and p = xy, qyz, r = zx.
Result 7. n = 2 expanded is
a
4
+ b
4
+ c
4
+ abc(a + b + c) a
3
b + b
3
c + c
3
a + ab
3
+ bc
3
+ ca
3
.
Result 8. Schurs inequality of fourth degree can be rewritten into
(a + b + c)(a
3
+ b
3
+ c
3
+ 3abc) 2(a
2
+ b
2
+ c
2
)(ab + bc + ca).
Result 9. Schurs inequality of third degree is equivalent with
a
b + c
+
b
c + a
+
c
a + b
+
4abc
(a + b)(b + c)(c + a)
2.
Result 10. For a, b, c > 0 and abc = 1 we have
(a 1)
1
b
1
+ (b 1)
1
c
1
+ (c 1)
1
a
1
0.
(Let a =
x
y
etc, then this is Schurs inequality of 0-th degree.)
Result 11. Third degree:
(a
2
+ b
2
+ c
2
)(a + b + c) + 9abc 2(a + b + c)(ab + bc + ca).
Result 12. (Darij Grinberg) (weaker form of Result 4)
a
2
+ b
2
+ c
2
+ 2abc + 1 2(ab + bc + ca).
3
Result 13. (Stronger than 3rd degree, equivalent with 4th degree)
a
3
+ b
3
+ c
3
+ 3abc
cyc
bc(b + c) +
bc(b c)
2
+ ca(c a)
2
+ ab(a b)
2
a + b + c
.
Result 14. (4th degree)
a
2
+ b
2
+ c
2
+
6abc(a + b + c)
a
2
+ b
2
+ c
2
+ ab + bc + ca
2(ab + bc + ca).
Result 15. (D.Duc Lam)
a
b + c
2
+
b
c + a
2
+
c
a + b
2
+
10abc
(a + b)(b + c)(c + a)
2.
Result 16. (Stronger than Schur of third degree, but weaker than 5th degree)
a
2
+ b
2
+ c
2
ab + bc + ca
+
8abc
(a + b)(b + c)(c + a)
2
Result 17. (Schur of 5th degree)
a
2
+ b
2
+ c
2
+
6abc
a + b + c
+
(a + b + c)abc
a
2
+ b
2
+ c
2
2(ab + bc + ca)
4

Schur Inequality

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Schur Inequality

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Schur Inequality

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Schur and related inequalities

(a + b + c)(a + b + c)(a b + c)(a + b c)

You might also like