Winter 2007 I n many schools today, when a student cant keep up in class, that students only option for help is to qualify for special education ser- vices. However, if a student struggles at a school that uses the responsiveness to intervention (RTI) model, the school staffs frst thought is: Maybe this child isnt getting the instruction that he or she needs to succeed. In other words, the student isnt being responsive to the instruction. This doesnt mean that the student isnt trying, but most general- ly he or she isnt understanding what is being taught by the teacher. These schools dont wait for students to fail for an extended period. They want to act immediately to get the student the help needed. They regularly screen all students to make sure classroom instruc- tion is on target for the students. Each child is com- pared to others of the same age and in the same grade and same class. School-wide screenings and progress monitor- ing focus on all students achievements in class. For those students who score lowest on in-class subjects and dont seem to be mastering classroom lessons, the school uses a step-by-step teaching process using scientifcally proven teaching techniques and fre- quent brief assessments to monitor progressthat is, to determine whether the teaching techniques are helping. Results from progress monitoring, usually given at least once a week, show what planning and methods to use for academic success. This process, when done according to effective teaching practices helps to determine whether a students low achieve- ment is due to instructional or behavioral factors or whether the child has a possible learning disability. Think of responsiveness to intervention as a se- ries of steps. The frst step is instruction in the gen- eral classroom. Screening tests given in the class- room reveal students at risk for reading and other learning diffculties. For example, testing may show that a student who has diffculty reading needs ad- ditional instruction in phonics. In the second step, the classroom teacher might handle the instruction. In other cases, someone who has expertise in read- ing and phonics might instruct the student and other students who have the same diffculty. S tudents who fail to respond to this instruction may then be considered for more specialized instruction in step three, where instruction NRCLD developed this brief to help you understand responsiveness to intervention, an education model that promotes early identication of students who may be at risk for learning diculties. Progress monitoring is a scientically based practice of assessing students performance on a regular basis. Progress monitoring helps school teams make deci- sions about instruction. An NRCLD brief related to this topic is What is Progress Monitoring? Responsiveness to intervention (RTI) is addressed through federal law and refers to a tiered approach to instruction. Students who do not make adequate ac- ademic progress and who are at risk for reading and other learning disabilities receive increasingly inten- sive instructional services. See the graphic on page 2. 2 may occur with greater frequency or duration. If the achievement diffculties persist, a team of edu- cators from different felds (for example, reading or counseling) completes a comprehensive evalu- ation to determine eligibility for special education and related services. Thats because responsiveness to intervention alone is not suffcient to identify a learning disability. All in all, the goal is to provide the type of instruction and educational assistance the student needs to be successful in the general education classroom. In the responsiveness to intervention model, one of the benefts for parents is that they get to see how their child is doing, compared to peers, and how the childs class measures up to other classes of the same grade. They can get these results on a regular basis from their school. If class scores are down, for instance, questions will be raised about the quality of teaching in that class; thus, classroom teachers are more accountable for their instruction. Responsiveness to intervention, with its in- creased instructional precision, is now used more to prevent academic failure than to specifcally de- termine which students have learning disabilities. Also, it has been used mostly for reading in elemen- tary schools. Almost no research results yet exist on how it works in middle schools or high schools; practical application of it in math instruction, too, needs to be further documented. A lthough unanswered questions need fur- ther research, RTI thus far has compelling benefts. When RTI is implemented with rigor and fdelity, all students receive high-quality instruction in their general education setting. All students are screened for academics and behavior and have their progress monitored to pinpoint spe- cifc diffculties. A continuing advantage for all students is the opportunity to be identifed as at risk for learn- ing diffculties early in their education instead of having to failsometimes for yearsbefore get- ting additional services. And, all students have the opportunity to get assistance at the level needed, re- ducing the number of students referred for special education services. For a long time, special education has been the instructional solution for struggling learners even when they didnt have learning disabilities. Because an abundance of research has shown that well-de- signed instructional programs and strategies signif- cantly improve learning when carefully monitored, the responsiveness to intervention approach may be a method to improve learning in general education and reduce referrals to special education. NRCLD is a joint project of researchers at Vander- bilt University and the University of Kansas. This document was produced under U.S. Department of Education Grant No. H324U010004. Renee Bradley served as the project offcer. The views ex- pressed herein do not necessarily represent the po- sitions or policies of the Department of Education. No offcial endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education of any product, commodity, service or enterprise mentioned in this publication is in- tended or should be inferred. This report is in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not neces- sary, the citation should be: National Research Center on Learning Disabilities (2007). What is responsiveness to intervention? [Brochure]. Lawrence, KS: Author.