1 www.primatech.com Copyright 2005, Primatech Inc.

All rights reserved

FAQ SHEET
- LAYERS OF PROTECTION ANALYSIS (LOPA)
Acronyms and Abbreviations Used
ANSI - American National Standards Institute
IPL - Independent Protection Layer
ISA - The Instrumentation, Systems and Automation Society
LOPA - Layers of Protection Analysis
PHA - Process Hazard Analysis
QRA - Quantitative Risk Analysis
SIS - Safety Instrumented System
What is LOPA?
It is a simplified risk assessment method. It provides a method for evaluating the risk of
hazard scenarios and comparing it with risk tolerance criteria to decide if existing
safeguards are adequate, and whether additional safeguards are needed. Various
LOPA methods are available.
LOPA does not suggest which safeguards to add or which design to choose but it does
assist in deciding between alternatives.
LOPA can be viewed as an extension of Process Hazard Analysis (PHA). Typically, it is
applied after a PHA has been performed. LOPA builds on the information developed in
the PHA.
Why was LOPA developed?
Subjective engineering judgement is used to identify the need for additional safeguards
in process hazard analysis. This can lead to disagreements and possibly the
implementation of inappropriate measures to reduce risk. It was recognized that a more
rational and objective approach was needed.
Can you tell me more about layers of protection?
Process designers use a variety of protection layers, or safeguards, to provide a
defense in depth against catastrophic accidents. They are devices, systems or actions
that are capable of preventing a scenario from proceeding to an undesired
consequence. For example, they may be:
2 www.primatech.com Copyright 2005, Primatech Inc. All rights reserved
C Inherently safe design features
C Physical protection such as relief devices
C Post-release physical protection such as fire suppression systems
C Plant and community emergency response
C Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS)
Ideally such protection layers should be independent from one another so that any one
will perform its function regardless of the action or failure of any other protection layer or
the initiating event. When they meet this criterion they are called Independent Protection
Layers (IPL). Not all safeguards meet the independence requirements to be classified
as an IPL, although all IPLs are safeguards. For example, two standby pumps that are
both electrically powered do not fail independently in the event of loss of power.
LOPA addresses safeguards that are IPLs. Such safeguards include SIS, also called
interlocks and emergency shutdown systems. SIS are addressed by the standard
ANSI/ISA S84.00.01-2004, Functional Safety: Safety Instrumented Systems for the
Process Industry Sector, called S84 herein, which can include the use of LOPA.
What is involved in LOPA?
Individual hazard scenarios defined by cause-consequence pairs are analyzed.
Scenario risk is determined by combining scenario frequency and consequence
severity. Individual protection layers are analyzed for their effectiveness and the
combined effects of the protection layers are compared against risk tolerance criteria to
determine if additional risk reduction is required to reach a tolerable level.
Scenario frequency is determined by combining initiating event frequency, IPL failure
probabilities and the probabilities of enabling events/conditions and conditional
modifiers. Enabling events or conditions do not directly cause the scenario but must be
present or active for the scenario to proceed, for example, the process being in a
particular mode or phase. Commonly considered conditional modifiers are the
probability that released flammable/explosive material will ignite, the probability that an
individual will be present to be exposed to a hazard, and the probability than an
exposed individual will actually be impacted. Order of magnitude estimates are used for
frequencies, probabilities and consequence severity.
3 www.primatech.com Copyright 2005, Primatech Inc. All rights reserved
How do risk tolerance criteria help?
Without risk tolerance criteria, there is a tendency to keep adding safeguards in the
belief that the more added, the safer the process. This can be a false assumption.
Eventually safeguards will be added that are unnecessary. This reduces the focus on
safeguards that are critical to achieving tolerable risk. Unnecessary safeguards also add
complexity that may result in new, unidentified hazard scenarios.
LOPA helps focus limited resources on the most critical safeguards.
How does LOPA relate to Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)?
LOPA adds simplifying assumptions for the numerical information used. The
simplifications are intended to be conservative so that QRA would show less risk for a
scenario than LOPA.
How should I conduct PHAs to facilitate LOPA?
LOPA studies will be easier to conduct if the following issues are addressed during the
PHA:
C Clarify initiating events, i.e. causes of hazard scenarios
C Provide sufficient scenario detail
C Express consequences in a form compatible with LOPA
C Record and identify candidate IPLs, i.e. safeguards
C List all safeguards before deciding if they are IPLs
C Consider identifying enabling events/conditions and conditional events
C Rank hazard scenarios so they can be screened for LOPA
C Flag recommendations for additional IPLs
4 www.primatech.com Copyright 2005, Primatech Inc. All rights reserved
Are there other applications of LOPA?
Yes. It can be extended to many situations involving risk-informed decision making
including:
C Design
C Capital improvement planning
C Management of change
C Evaluating facility siting risk
C Mechanical integrity programs
C Identifying operator roles
C Incident investigation
C Emergency response planning
C Bypassing a safety system
C Determining the design basis for over-pressure protection
C Determining the need for emergency isolation valves
C Screening tool for QRA
Can you summarize what LOPA does and doesnt do?
There are three issues for protection layers:
C How safe is safe enough?
C How many protection layers are needed?
C How much risk reduction should each layer provide?
Risk tolerance criteria must be established for LOPA and they address the first issue.
LOPA helps decide how much risk reduction is needed and how many protection layers
should be used. It does not help decide what specific IPLs should be used.
5 www.primatech.com Copyright 2005, Primatech Inc. All rights reserved
Why should I perform LOPA?
C Provides an objective, rational and defensible basis for recommendations to
install or not install safeguards after a PHA has been performed.
C Meets the requirements of the S84 standard for SIS. Note that OSHA expects
compliance with S84.
C Provides the basis for a clear, functional specification for safety instrumented
systems.
How can I get more information?
Contact Primatech at:
50 Northwoods Blvd.
Columbus, OH 43235
Tel 614-841-9800
Fax 614-841-9805
www.primatech.com
www.primatech.com Copyright 2005, Primatech Inc. All rights reserved
About Primatech
Primatech specializes in Process Safety,
Security and Risk Management. We offer
consulting, training and software (e.g., HAZOP
Software - PHAWorks and tracking software -
Tracker) to assist our clients in identifying and
reducing the risks posed by hazardous materials.
Companies in a variety of industries choose
Primatech to help them manage their risks. We
help companies reduce the likelihood and
consequences of releases, which helps protect
employees and the public and prevent damage
to equipment and the environment. Reducing
these risks also improves productivity and
quality. We help companies comply with the
OSHA Process Safety Management (PSM)
standard, EPA Risk Management Program
(RMP), and other industry guidelines and
requirements.
Our capabilities include:
Process Hazard Analysis (PHA), e.g.,
HAZOP Studies
Security Vulnerability Analysis for
Deliberate Acts Including Terrorism
Compliance Audits and Program
Assessments
PSM Program Development and
Implementation
RMP Program Development and
Implementation
Cyber Security Management
Release and Spill Assessment
Process Security Management
S84 - Safety Instrumented Systems
Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA)
Operating and Maintenance Procedures
Development
Mechanical Integrity Program
Development and Implementation
Guidance
Human Factors and Human Error Analysis
Facility Siting Analysis
Dispersion and Consequence Modeling
Probability Modeling
Quantitative Risk Assessment
Emergency Response Program
Development and Implementation
Guidance
Expert Witness Testimony and Litigation
Support
Primatech clients are often Fortune 500 companies
but also include medium and smaller sized
companies. We specialize in serving the process
industries, and have served hundreds of industrial
facilities throughout the world.
Primatech projects have spanned a wide range of
industries including:
Aerospace
Agricultural Chemicals
Bulk Commodity Chemicals
Cold Storage Warehousing
Electronics
Food Processing
Hazardous Waste Treatment
Inorganic Chemicals
Mining
Oil & Gas Production and Distribution
Oil & Gas Pipelines and Terminals
Organic Chemicals
Paints, Coatings, Resins & Adhesives
Petroleum Refining
Pharmaceuticals
Polymers and Resins
Propane Storage & Distribution
Pulp & Paper
Rubber and Plastics
Semiconductors
Steel
Water & Wastewater Treatment
Our services and products enable our clients to
achieve their risk, safety and security objectives faster
and easier.
Primatech is an independent company with no vested
interests and is seen, therefore, to deliver work
recognized as objective and unbiased.