Real Estate Development
Real Estate Development
Submitted by Surya.P.S
III SemesterUrban Design
Foreign Direct Investment in Indian Real Estate Sector2
ABSTRACT
CONTENTS
• FDI introduction
• FDI in India
• FDI in Indian Real estate and economic growth
• Indian FDI rules – real estate
• Related developments related to the FDI rules
• Benefits of FDI in real estate
• Problems faced by FDI’s in Real estate sector
• Disadvantages
• Projects where FDI has played an important role
• Concluding remarks
FDI INTRODUCTION
Foreign direct investment (FDI) in its classic form is defined as a
company from one country making a physical investment into building a
factory in another country. It is the establishment of an enterprise by a
foreigner Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) basically is the revenue
brought into the country by foreign agencies for the purpose of business
or investments, through the official Foreign Investment Promotion
Board (FIPB). The FDI relationship consists of a parent enterprise and a
foreign affiliate which together form an international business or a
Multinational Corporation (MNC).
FDI IN INDIA
India has among the most liberal and transparent policies on FDI
among the emerging economies.
India is the largest democracy and 4th largest economy (in terms of
purchase power parity) in the world. India is also the tenth most
industrialized country in the world. With its consistent growth
performance and abundant high-skilled manpower, India provides
enormous opportunities for investment, both domestic and
foreign.
In the initial periods India was trying to protect itself but after 1991, the
policies in Indian trade became very liberal. The reason being, after
independence from Britain 50 years ago, India developed a highly
protected, semi-socialist autarkic economy. Structural and bureaucratic
impediments were vigorously fostered, along with a distrust of foreign
business.
The size of the real estate industry in India is estimated to be around US$
12 billion. As per studies, this figure is growing at a pace of 30% for the
last few years. Majority of the real estate developed in India (almost 80%)
is residential space and the rest comprise office, shopping malls, hotels
In 2003-04, India received total FDI inflow of US$ 2.70 billion, of which
only 4.5% was committed to real estate sector. In 2004-05 this increased
to US$ 3.75 billion of which, the real estate shares was 10.6%. However,
in 2005-06, while total FDIs in India were estimated at US$ 5.46 billion,
the real estate share in them was only around 16%.
The Government, vide Press Note 2 (2005 Series) dated 2.3.2005, had
notified the policy for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in townships,
housing, built-up infrastructure and construction-development projects.
With a view to catalyzing investment in townships, housing, built-up
infrastructure and construction-development projects as an instrument to
generate economic activity, create new employment opportunities and
add to the available housing stock and built-up infrastructure, the
Government has decided to allow FDI up to 100% under the automatic
route in townships, housing, built-up infrastructure and construction-
development projects (which would include, but not be restricted to,
housing, commercial premises, hotels, resorts, hospitals, educational
institutions, recreational facilities, city and regional level infrastructure),
subject to the following guidelines:
a. Minimum area to be developed under each project would be as under:
i. In case of development of serviced housing plots, a minimum land
area of 10 hectares
ii. In case of construction-development projects, a minimum built-up
area of 50,000 sq.mts
iii. In case of a combination project, anyone of the above two
conditions would suffice
e. The project shall conform to the norms and standards, including land
use requirements and provision of community amenities and common
facilities, as laid down in the applicable building control regulations, bye-
laws, rules, and other regulations of the State
Government/Municipal/Local Body concerned
• Resorts
• Hospitals
• Industrial parks
• Educational Institutions
• Recreational Facilities
• SEZ's, etc
Further, it was ensured that FDI backed projects would be accorded
national treatment at par with local developers. The State Government's/
Municipal bodies now approve projects for construction-development
involving foreign investment.
10.6%
9.2%
4.2%
12.5% 12.0%
Ireland
Canada
Poland
UK
USA
Japan
Republic
India
Slovak
India US
9%
18% 24%
49% 5%
37%
28% 30%
The real estate market was characterized by small players. None of the
local developers had a truly national presence and large companies were
not fully involved in real estate development. None of the players have
The active participation of FDI's in the Indian real estate industry has
propelled an extensive growth & expansion of the industry, leading to a
boom in the real estate investment. Further, enhancing Indian
infrastructure & providing a sustainable growth.
to a few entry rules spelling out the proportion of equity that the foreign
entrant can hold in an Indian (registered) company or business.
Domestic Policy
The Urban Land Ceiling Acts and Rent Control Acts in States are a serious
constraint on the entire real estate sector. These Acts need to be repealed
if a construction boom is to be initiated that would reverse the decline in
overall investment, attract FDI, generate employment and make rental
accommodation available to the poor. The Centre has already repealed
the Urban Land Ceiling Act but each State has to issue a notification to
repeal the Act in that State. Rent Control is a State subject and each State
would have to reform its Rent control Act.
Image and Attitude
Though economic reforms welcoming foreign capital were introduced in
the nineties it does not seem so far to be really evident in our overall
attitude. There is a lingering perception abroad that foreign investors are
still looked at with some suspicion. There is also a view that some
unhappy episodes in the past have a multiplier effect by adversely
affecting the business environment in India.
When a foreign investor considers making any new investment decision, it
goes through four stages in the decision making process and action cycle,
namely, (a) screening, (b) planning, (c) implementing and (d) operating
and expanding. The biggest barrier for India is at the first, screening stage
itself in the action cycle. “Often India looses out at the screening stage
itself” (BCG). This is primarily because we do not get across effectively to
the decision-making “board room” levels of corporate entities where a
final decision is taken. Our promotional effort is quite often of a general
nature and not corporate specific.
DISADVANTAGES
Increased inflow of estate investments in India arising out of flexible FDI
policies will have a direct impact on the real restate scenario of India.
More and more of NON Resident Indians are interested in investing in
India. More investments mean more job opportunities and more jobs
means more workforces. This has created a huge demand and supply gap
in housing in India.
Huge inflows in real estate has led to a boom in the sector, but completely
disconnected from local economic fundamentals. The current scenario is
that of the dusty suburbs of Bangalore, Delhi and Mumbai with high rises
that have no reliable power or water supply, battered roads if at all, no
public transport, and these houses command huge prices.
How sustainable are half a million dollar apartments in a country with an
average wage of about $1000 (a year)? Sure there are rich people in poor
countries. May be enough to keep things going merrily forever, maybe
not.
Also, the growth, whatsoever has only been limited to Tier-I cities. The tier
2 cities are getting increasingly prominent in the press but it will still be
awhile before they compete with tier I cities for the FDI investments.
It is required that there are policies proposed which cater to lower entry
cost cities for real estate investment than to make real estate pitches for
high FDI investment. Else, given the fizz going out of the global markets,
the Indian bubble may probably be short lived too.
After a year of opening the gates to foreign direct investments this was
the first real estate project approved by Foreign Investment promotion
board. The project has reached in the initial stage of making a master
plan and they already launched for the overseas market.
The township is developing on a 100 acre land and it will have pre-built
plotted housing and condominiums, healthcare, education and
entertainment facilities. The township is constructed as a self-contained
township. About four per cent of the space is commercial while the
remaining is residential. The project is targeted at both domestic and
international buyers.
Feedback ventures Ltd has tied up with Malaysia based real estate
Company for the project costing Rs 800 Crores. The project will have 74
per cent of equity coming from Malaysia and the Middle East. The
Malaysian equity will be put in by two companies Westport and Kontur
Bintang while the Middle East investment will be made by Tricolour
Investments.
The remaining 26 per cent equity will be from Feedback Ventures and the
Dalmiya group. The total equity in the project would be Rs 100 crore and
the remaining funds are likely to come in as advance payment from the
customers.
These kinds of large scale projects would not be raise without the FDI’s
and a country like India is able to do it because of these benefits.
Bangalore-based Mantri Developers’ retail real estate push has got Rs 310
crore investment in 2007.
The company has taken up six projects totaling 12 million square feet in
Bangalore and expected to launch projects in Chennai (one million square
feet) and Hyderabad (two million square feet) this year. The projects
include
• The mall on Sampige Road which is an 8 lakh square feet project
and houses a multiplex, hypermarket and a few large department
stores in addition to branded retail stores.
• The mall at J P Nagar which is expected to house well known brands.
• 1.5 million square feet IT park in Pune.
DLF sold 49 per cent stake in its seven townships to Merrill Lynch and
Brahma Investments to raise Rs 1,675 crore. Merrill Lynch will pay
Rs.1481 crore ($375 million) to acquire a 49 percent equity stake in seven
projects being built by DLF. In a separate transaction, Brahma
Investments will be buying 49 percent stake in a middle-income housing
project at Panchkula in Haryana for Rs.194 crore ($49 million).
Priced at Rs 3,800, per sq ft, the project is offering a wide choice of two,
three and four-bedroom apartments spread across five towers. There
would be 534 apartments on offer with sizes ranging between 1,430 sq ft
and 2,012 sq ft. spread over 11 acres, about 84 per cent of the project
would have exquisitely landscaped lawns with abundant greenery and
large open spaces. The lawns would have an organic fruit orchard and an
herb section aimed at promoting healthy lifestyle for the residents.
Situated in Sector 66, near Golf Course Road and close to the Delhi Metro
line extension, the premium township would have quick and easy
connectivity to Delhi airport and NCR. The project is expected to be ready
for occupation by 2012.
The complex would have a full feature clubhouse equipped with a gym,
swimming pool with a pool-side cafe, a 24×7 coffee bar, squash court,
snooker room, table tennis, basket ball court, badminton courts, video
games room, kids play room, yoga/dance studio, foot reflexology zone,
and a multi-purpose party room. Outdoor recreational facilities will include
a jogging trail and a fitness walk.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
This paper analyzed the changing patterns of FDI in India. The evolution of
FDI has been divided into two waves- ‘First Wave’ covering the period
1975-90 and ‘Second Wave’ covering the period 1991 onwards. The
analysis shows that the FDI in India has increased considerably during
Second Wave as compared to First Wave.
Property prices in India are rising fast, and not just in the biggest cities. As
the tech boom spreads across the country, as more Indians buy homes,
and as the economy grows at faster than 8% a year, real estate is
attracting more investors, many of them from abroad. With its consistent
growth performance and abundant high-skilled manpower, India provides
enormous opportunities for investment, both domestic and foreign.
India is a multi-cultural society and a large number of multinational
companies (MNC) do not understand the diversity and the multi-plural
nature of the society. Huge inflows in real estate has led to a boom in the
sector, but completely disconnected from local economic fundamentals.
In this context the question arises “How sustainable are half a million
dollar apartments in a country with an average wage of about $1000 (a
year)?” The new current and benefits brought by the FDI development in
Indian real Estate Sector is not improving the major poor population in
India. If there are some schemes allowing this section of population to get
benefit from the new real estate developments brought by FDI it would
have been better.
REFERENCES
1. Report of the Steering group on Foreign Direct Investment ,
Planning Commission, Government of India, New Delhi
2. Foreign Direct Investments In Real Estate, Sandesh Savant, Executive
Director, Indiaproperties
3. Foreign Direct Investment in India in 1990’s, Trends and issues, R Nagaraj,
Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 38, No. 17 (Apr. 26 - May 2, 2003), pp.
1701-1712
%20classified,%20property%20listing,%20realty,%20real%20estate
%20India.htm
18.Gurgaon%20Township%20Project%20To%20Get%20Rs%20800-crore
%20FDI.htm
19.Merrill%20Lynch%20forms%20JV%20with%20DLF%20in%20India
%20%20Indian%20Real%20Estate%20Discussion%20Forum.htm