0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views29 pages

Frequencies Frequency Table: Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

The document contains frequency tables summarizing data from 39 respondents. The tables include demographics like age, gender, birth order, as well as variables like parents' education and occupation, school absences, report card grades, behavioral scores, and cross tabulations. Key findings are that 56.4% of respondents were 11 years old, 59% were male, 64.1% were the first born child, most parents had secondary education or higher, fathers most commonly worked in the private sector, and the majority of respondents received good report card grades and normal behavioral scores.

Uploaded by

jackbay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views29 pages

Frequencies Frequency Table: Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

The document contains frequency tables summarizing data from 39 respondents. The tables include demographics like age, gender, birth order, as well as variables like parents' education and occupation, school absences, report card grades, behavioral scores, and cross tabulations. Key findings are that 56.4% of respondents were 11 years old, 59% were male, 64.1% were the first born child, most parents had secondary education or higher, fathers most commonly worked in the private sector, and the majority of respondents received good report card grades and normal behavioral scores.

Uploaded by

jackbay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 29

Frequencies

Frequency Table
Umur

Valid

10
11
Total

Frequency
17
22
39

Percent
43.6
56.4
100.0

Valid Percent
43.6
56.4
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
43.6
100.0

Jenis kelamin

Valid

Laki-laki
Perempuan
Total

Frequency
19
20
39

Percent
48.7
51.3
100.0

Valid Percent
48.7
51.3
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
48.7
100.0

Anak ke

Valid

1
2
3
4
Total

Frequency
25
11
2
1
39

Percent
64.1
28.2
5.1
2.6
100.0

Valid Percent
64.1
28.2
5.1
2.6
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
64.1
92.3
97.4
100.0

Pendidikan ayah

Valid

SMP
SMA
D3
S1
S2
S3
Total

Frequency
3
16
2
10
5
3
39

Percent
7.7
41.0
5.1
25.6
12.8
7.7
100.0

Valid Percent
7.7
41.0
5.1
25.6
12.8
7.7
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
7.7
48.7
53.8
79.5
92.3
100.0

Pendidikan ibu

Valid

SD
SMP
SMA
D3
S1
S2
S3
Total

Frequency
2
7
13
2
13
1
1
39

Percent
5.1
17.9
33.3
5.1
33.3
2.6
2.6
100.0

Valid Percent
5.1
17.9
33.3
5.1
33.3
2.6
2.6
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
5.1
23.1
56.4
61.5
94.9
97.4
100.0

Pekerjaan ayah

Valid

Swasta
Wiraswasta
PNS
Total

Frequency
23
7
9
39

Percent
59.0
17.9
23.1
100.0

Valid Percent
59.0
17.9
23.1
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
59.0
76.9
100.0

Pekerjaan ibu

Valid

IRT
Swasta
Wiraswasta
PNS
Total

Frequency
12
12
6
9
39

Percent
30.8
30.8
15.4
23.1
100.0

Valid Percent
30.8
30.8
15.4
23.1
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
30.8
61.5
76.9
100.0

Absensi

Valid

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
Total

Frequency
10
8
7
4
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
39

Percent
25.6
20.5
17.9
10.3
2.6
10.3
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
100.0

Valid Percent
25.6
20.5
17.9
10.3
2.6
10.3
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
25.6
46.2
64.1
74.4
76.9
87.2
89.7
92.3
94.9
97.4
100.0

Nilai raport

Valid

Baik
Kurang
Total

Frequency
23
16
39

Percent
59.0
41.0
100.0

Valid Percent
59.0
41.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
59.0
100.0

Total difficulties score

Valid

Normal
Borderline
Abnormal
Total

Frequency
29
2
8
39

Percent
74.4
5.1
20.5
100.0

Valid Percent
74.4
5.1
20.5
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
74.4
79.5
100.0

Emotional

Valid

Normal
Borderline
Total

Frequency
36
3
39

Percent
92.3
7.7
100.0

Valid Percent
92.3
7.7
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
92.3
100.0

Conduct problems

Valid

Normal
Borderline
Abnormal
Total

Frequency
34
3
2
39

Percent
87.2
7.7
5.1
100.0

Valid Percent
87.2
7.7
5.1
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
87.2
94.9
100.0

Hyperactivity

Valid

Normal
Borderline
Abnormal
Total

Frequency
32
5
2
39

Percent
82.1
12.8
5.1
100.0

Valid Percent
82.1
12.8
5.1
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
82.1
94.9
100.0

Peer problems

Valid

Normal
Borderline
Abnormal
Total

Frequency
31
7
1
39

Percent
79.5
17.9
2.6
100.0

Valid Percent
79.5
17.9
2.6
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
79.5
97.4
100.0

Prosocial behavior score

Valid

Normal
Borderline
Abnormal
Total

Frequency
31
1
7
39

Percent
79.5
2.6
17.9
100.0

Valid Percent
79.5
2.6
17.9
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
79.5
82.1
100.0

Crosstabs
Total difficulties score * Nilai raport
Crosstab

Total difficulties
score

Normal

Borderline

Abnormal

Total

Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total

Nilai raport
Baik
Kurang
19
10
17.1
11.9
48.7%
25.6%
1
1
1.2
.8
2.6%
2.6%
3
5
4.7
3.3
7.7%
12.8%
23
16
23.0
16.0
59.0%
41.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
2.104a
2.082
2.049

2
2

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.349
.353

.152

df

39

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The


minimum expected count is .82.

Total
29
29.0
74.4%
2
2.0
5.1%
8
8.0
20.5%
39
39.0
100.0%

Emotional * Nilai raport


Crosstab

Emotional

Normal

Borderline

Total

Nilai raport
Baik
Kurang
21
15
21.2
14.8
53.8%
38.5%
2
1
1.8
1.2
5.1%
2.6%
23
16
23.0
16.0
59.0%
41.0%

Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total

Total
36
36.0
92.3%
3
3.0
7.7%
39
39.0
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
.079b
.000
.081
.077

df
1
1
1
1

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.778
1.000
.776

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

1.000

.637

.781

39

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table


b. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
23.

Conduct problems * Nilai raport


Crosstab

Conduct
problems

Normal

Borderline

Abnormal

Total

Nilai raport
Baik
Kurang
22
12
20.1
13.9
56.4%
30.8%
1
2
1.8
1.2
2.6%
5.1%
0
2
1.2
.8
.0%
5.1%
23
16
23.0
16.0
59.0%
41.0%

Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
4.152a
4.834
4.045

2
2

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.125
.089

.044

df

39

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The


minimum expected count is .82.

Total
34
34.0
87.2%
3
3.0
7.7%
2
2.0
5.1%
39
39.0
100.0%

Hyperactivity * Nilai raport


Crosstab

Hyperactivity

Normal

Borderline

Abnormal

Total

Nilai raport
Baik
Kurang
22
10
18.9
13.1
56.4%
25.6%
1
4
2.9
2.1
2.6%
10.3%
0
2
1.2
.8
.0%
5.1%
23
16
23.0
16.0
59.0%
41.0%

Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
7.278a
8.049
6.841

2
2

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.026
.018

.009

df

39

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The


minimum expected count is .82.

Total
32
32.0
82.1%
5
5.0
12.8%
2
2.0
5.1%
39
39.0
100.0%

Peer problems * Nilai raport


Crosstab

Peer
problems

Normal

Borderline

Abnormal

Total

Nilai raport
Baik
Kurang
21
10
18.3
12.7
53.8%
25.6%
1
6
4.1
2.9
2.6%
15.4%
1
0
.6
.4
2.6%
.0%
23
16
23.0
16.0
59.0%
41.0%

Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
7.459a
8.075
2.403

2
2

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.024
.018

.121

df

39

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The


minimum expected count is .41.

Total
31
31.0
79.5%
7
7.0
17.9%
1
1.0
2.6%
39
39.0
100.0%

Prosocial behavior score * Nilai raport


Crosstab

Prosocial
behavior
score

Normal

Borderline

Abnormal

Total

Nilai raport
Baik
Kurang
21
10
18.3
12.7
53.8%
25.6%
1
0
.6
.4
2.6%
.0%
1
6
4.1
2.9
2.6%
15.4%
23
16
23.0
16.0
59.0%
41.0%

Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
7.459a
8.075
5.925

2
2

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.024
.018

.015

df

39

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The


minimum expected count is .41.

Total
31
31.0
79.5%
1
1.0
2.6%
7
7.0
17.9%
39
39.0
100.0%

Crosstabs
Total difficulties score (gabungan) * Nilai raport
Crosstab

Total difficulties score


(gabungan)

Normal

Nilai raport
Baik
Kurang
19
10
17.1
11.9
48.7%
25.6%
4
6
5.9
4.1
10.3%
15.4%
23
16
23.0
16.0
59.0%
41.0%

Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total

Borderline/Abnormal

Total

Total
29
29.0
74.4%
10
10.0
25.6%
39
39.0
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
2.001b
1.085
1.979
1.950

df
1
1
1
1

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.157
.297
.159

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.264

.149

.163

39

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table


b. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.
10.
Symmetric Measures

Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient

Value
.221
39

Approx. Sig.
.157

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for Total
difficulties score
(gabungan) (Normal /
Borderline/Abnormal)
For cohort Nilai raport
= Baik
For cohort Nilai raport
= Kurang
N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper

2.850

.650

12.505

1.638

.733

3.659

.575

.282

1.172

39

Conduct problems (gabungan) * Nilai raport


Crosstab

Conduct problems
(gabungan)

Normal

Borderline/Abnormal

Total

Nilai raport
Baik
Kurang
22
12
20.1
13.9
56.4%
30.8%
1
4
2.9
2.1
2.6%
10.3%
23
16
23.0
16.0
59.0%
41.0%

Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total

Total
34
34.0
87.2%
5
5.0
12.8%
39
39.0
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
3.601b
1.990
3.649
3.508

df
1
1
1
1

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.058
.158
.056

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.139

.080

.061

39

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table


b. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.
05.

Symmetric Measures

Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient

Value
.291
39

Approx. Sig.
.058

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for
Conduct problems
(gabungan) (Normal /
Borderline/Abnormal)
For cohort Nilai raport
= Baik
For cohort Nilai raport
= Kurang
N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper

7.333

.734

73.248

3.235

.551

19.004

.441

.235

.830

39

Hyperactivity (gabungan) * Nilai raport


Crosstab

Hyperactivity
(gabungan)

Normal

Borderline/Abnormal

Total

Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total

Nilai raport
Baik
Kurang
22
10
18.9
13.1
56.4%
25.6%
1
6
4.1
2.9
2.6%
15.4%
23
16
23.0
16.0
59.0%
41.0%

Total
32
32.0
82.1%
7
7.0
17.9%
39
39.0
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
7.042b
4.971
7.311
6.861

df
1
1
1
1

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.008
.026
.007

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.013

.013

.009

39

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table


b. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.
87.
Symmetric Measures

Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient

Value
.391
39

Approx. Sig.
.008

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for
Hyperactivity
(gabungan) (Normal /
Borderline/Abnormal)
For cohort Nilai raport
= Baik
For cohort Nilai raport
= Kurang
N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper

13.200

1.398

124.626

4.813

.772

29.987

.365

.201

.662

39

Peer problems (gabungan) * Nilai raport


Crosstab

Peer problems
(gabungan)

Normal

Borderline/Abnormal

Total

Nilai raport
Baik
Kurang
21
10
18.3
12.7
53.8%
25.6%
2
6
4.7
3.3
5.1%
15.4%
23
16
23.0
16.0
59.0%
41.0%

Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total

Total
31
31.0
79.5%
8
8.0
20.5%
39
39.0
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
4.801b
3.197
4.819
4.678

df
1
1
1
1

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.028
.074
.028

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.045

.037

.031

39

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table


b. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.
28.

Symmetric Measures

Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient

Value
.331
39

Approx. Sig.
.028

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for Peer
problems
(gabungan) (Normal /
Borderline/Abnormal)
For cohort Nilai raport
= Baik
For cohort Nilai raport
= Kurang
N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper

6.300

1.075

36.936

2.710

.796

9.220

.430

.225

.822

39

Prosocial behavior score (gabungan) * Nilai raport


Crosstab

Prosocial behavior
score (gabungan)

Normal

Borderline/Abnormal

Total

Nilai raport
Baik
Kurang
21
10
18.3
12.7
53.8%
25.6%
2
6
4.7
3.3
5.1%
15.4%
23
16
23.0
16.0
59.0%
41.0%

Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total

Total
31
31.0
79.5%
8
8.0
20.5%
39
39.0
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
4.801b
3.197
4.819
4.678

df
1
1
1
1

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.028
.074
.028

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.045

.037

.031

39

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table


b. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.
28.

Symmetric Measures

Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient

Value
.331
39

Approx. Sig.
.028

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for Prosocial
behavior score
(gabungan) (Normal /
Borderline/Abnormal)
For cohort Nilai raport =
Baik
For cohort Nilai raport =
Kurang
N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper

6.300

1.075

36.936

2.710

.796

9.220

.430

.225

.822

39

Crosstabs
Jenis kelamin * Nilai raport Crosstabulation

Jenis kelamin

Laki-laki

Perempuan

Total

Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total

Nilai raport
Baik
Kurang
7
12
11.2
7.8
17.9%
30.8%
16
4
11.8
8.2
41.0%
10.3%
23
16
23.0
16.0
59.0%
41.0%

Total
19
19.0
48.7%
20
20.0
51.3%
39
39.0
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
7.501b
5.823
7.778
7.309

df
1
1
1
1

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.006
.016
.005

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.010

.007

.007

39

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table


b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.
79.

Symmetric Measures

Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient

Value
.402
39

Approx. Sig.
.006

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for Jenis
kelamin (Laki-laki /
Perempuan)
For cohort Nilai
raport = Baik
For cohort Nilai
raport = Kurang
N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper

.146

.035

.615

.461

.246

.863

3.158

1.232

8.095

39

Crosstabs
Total difficulties score * Jenis kelamin Crosstabulation

Total difficulties
score

Normal

Borderline

Abnormal

Total

Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total

Jenis kelamin
Laki-laki
Perempuan
16
13
14.1
14.9
41.0%
33.3%
0
2
1.0
1.0
.0%
5.1%
3
5
3.9
4.1
7.7%
12.8%
19
20
19.0
20.0
48.7%
51.3%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
2.787a
3.563
1.164

2
2

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.248
.168

.281

df

39

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The


minimum expected count is .97.

Symmetric Measures

Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient

Value
.258
39

Approx. Sig.
.248

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Total
29
29.0
74.4%
2
2.0
5.1%
8
8.0
20.5%
39
39.0
100.0%

Crosstabs
Total difficulties score (gabungan) * Jenis kelamin Crosstabulation

Total difficulties score


(gabungan)

Normal

Borderline/Abnormal

Total

Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% of Total

Jenis kelamin
Laki-laki
Perempuan
16
13
14.1
14.9
41.0%
33.3%
3
7
4.9
5.1
7.7%
17.9%
19
20
19.0
20.0
48.7%
51.3%

Total
29
29.0
74.4%
10
10.0
25.6%
39
39.0
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
1.886b
1.013
1.931
1.838

df
1
1
1
1

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.170
.314
.165

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.273

.157

.175

39

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table


b. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.
87.

Symmetric Measures

Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient

Value
.215
39

Approx. Sig.
.170

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for Total
difficulties score
(gabungan) (Normal /
Borderline/Abnormal)
For cohort Jenis
kelamin = Laki-laki
For cohort Jenis
kelamin = Perempuan
N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper

2.872

.617

13.366

1.839

.675

5.009

.640

.361

1.135

39

You might also like