The document describes a new cascade bowl design for glass feeders. It improves temperature stability and consistency of the glass gob by holding the glass longer in the upper part of the bowl where heat can be maintained, and moving it faster through the lower part. Tests found the new design reduced rejects by two-thirds and required half as many adjustments to maintain consistent gob weights compared to a conventional bowl design.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
161 views4 pages
Cascade Spout
The document describes a new cascade bowl design for glass feeders. It improves temperature stability and consistency of the glass gob by holding the glass longer in the upper part of the bowl where heat can be maintained, and moving it faster through the lower part. Tests found the new design reduced rejects by two-thirds and required half as many adjustments to maintain consistent gob weights compared to a conventional bowl design.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4
Improved thermal distribution in the bowl
Consistent and symmetrical ow patterns
Easily installed in existing spout casing Extra spout insulation layer Economical and efcient product BH-F Feeder Cascade Bowl www.vesgroup.com Driving progress Innovations in feeder technology Benets Improved temperature stability in the bowl Improved gob weight and gob shape stability Consistent gob thermal homogeneity Reduction in glass rejects Disappearance of cold, slow moving glass Bowl entrance temperatures less affected by the speed of the tube Even wear on the tube seat Rapid payback on initial cost Cascade Bowl Consistent thermal homogeneity of the gob is assured by this innovative design of spout bowl. The Cascade bowl holds the glass longer in the upper part of the bowl and upon entering the lower well the glass moves faster to the gap under the tube, thus reducing any deterioration in glass thermal homogeneity that occurs out of the zone of inuence of the surface heating. The outer shape of the Cascade bowl also permits the complete application of an additional thermal insulation layer within the feeder/spout casing to further reduce heat losses in this area and improve gob temperature stability. When the residence times of the specic glass ow paths are compared at different pulls, then the glass in the Cascade Bowl is held for a longer time period in upper area (where the glass temperature can be maintained by the surface heating system) than the conventional bowl . The cascade bowl also transports the glass quicker through the lower part of the bowl (where the glass temperature cannot be maintained by the surface heating system). The glass ow patterns fostered by the cascade bowl maintain the thermal homogeneity produced in the forehearth much better than the conventional bowl design. = GOB WEIGHT = TUBE HEIGHT POSITION = DEVIATION = SET POINTS
C o n v e n t i o n a l
C a s c a d e
B o w l R e l a t i v e
R e j e c t s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Day 0 0.5 1 1.5 Rejects for thin wall containers Average for std bowl = 1 Average for cascade bowl = 0.34 Improvements in Wall Thickness CONVENTIONAL SPOUT CASCADE SPOUT Improvements in weight control These graphs (actual historical display) illustrate the performance difference between the Cascade Spout bowl Design and Conventional Spout Bowl Design. The production line selected for a comparison test between the two bowl types was equipped with a 16-section, double gob, IS machine fed from a F 400 Series tandem T type forehearth with two BH-F type 900 feeders. The trial cascade bowl was installed on one of these feeders, while the second feeder remained conventional spout design. The line speed was 180 gobs per minute with an average gob weight of 131g. The tube height positions on both feeders were automati- cally controlled by the Heye gob weight control system. This system monitors the plunger displacement in the parison moulds and adjusts the tube height accordingly. This adjustment was monitored and recorded (blue line). Individual gob to gob weights for each feeder were monitored and recorded (green lines). Also displayed on the graph is the gob weight set point (orange line) and the gob weight deviation from set point (yellow line). Though the gob weight deviation (yellow line) from set point on both feeders are very similar, it can be seen that the adjustments of tube height (blue lines), required to correction variations from set point, for the cascade bowl were at least 50% less than those for the conventional bowl. Furthermore the spread, or deviation, of the gob to gob weight readings (green lines) are much improved on the cascade bowl when compared to those on the conventional bowl. On the graph titled Rejects for Thin glass (produced from results taken on the same production line), it can be seen by direct comparison of the two recordings that the average reject rate for the cascade bowl is 0.3 (/3rd) of the average reject rate for the standard bowl. Inserted Spout Spout Bowl Benets Improved temperature stability in the bowl Improved gob weight and gob shape stability Consistent gob thermal homogeneity Reduction in glass rejects Disappearance of cold, slow moving glass Bowl entrance temperatures less affected by the speed of the tube Even wear on the tube seat Rapid payback on initial cost Cascade Bowl Consistent thermal homogeneity of the gob is assured by this innovative design of spout bowl. The Cascade bowl holds the glass longer in the upper part of the bowl and upon entering the lower well the glass moves faster to the gap under the tube, thus reducing any deterioration in glass thermal homogeneity that occurs out of the zone of inuence of the surface heating. The outer shape of the Cascade bowl also permits the complete application of an additional thermal insulation layer within the feeder/spout casing to further reduce heat losses in this area and improve gob temperature stability. When the residence times of the specic glass ow paths are compared at different pulls, then the glass in the Cascade Bowl is held for a longer time period in upper area (where the glass temperature can be maintained by the surface heating system) than the conventional bowl . The cascade bowl also transports the glass quicker through the lower part of the bowl (where the glass temperature cannot be maintained by the surface heating system). The glass ow patterns fostered by the cascade bowl maintain the thermal homogeneity produced in the forehearth much better than the conventional bowl design. = GOB WEIGHT = TUBE HEIGHT POSITION = DEVIATION = SET POINTS
C o n v e n t i o n a l
C a s c a d e
B o w l R e l a t i v e
R e j e c t s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Day 0 0.5 1 1.5 Rejects for thin wall containers Average for std bowl = 1 Average for cascade bowl = 0.34 Improvements in Wall Thickness CONVENTIONAL SPOUT CASCADE SPOUT Improvements in weight control These graphs (actual historical display) illustrate the performance difference between the Cascade Spout bowl Design and Conventional Spout Bowl Design. The production line selected for a comparison test between the two bowl types was equipped with a 16-section, double gob, IS machine fed from a F 400 Series tandem T type forehearth with two BH-F type 900 feeders. The trial cascade bowl was installed on one of these feeders, while the second feeder remained conventional spout design. The line speed was 180 gobs per minute with an average gob weight of 131g. The tube height positions on both feeders were automati- cally controlled by the Heye gob weight control system. This system monitors the plunger displacement in the parison moulds and adjusts the tube height accordingly. This adjustment was monitored and recorded (blue line). Individual gob to gob weights for each feeder were monitored and recorded (green lines). Also displayed on the graph is the gob weight set point (orange line) and the gob weight deviation from set point (yellow line). Though the gob weight deviation (yellow line) from set point on both feeders are very similar, it can be seen that the adjustments of tube height (blue lines), required to correction variations from set point, for the cascade bowl were at least 50% less than those for the conventional bowl. Furthermore the spread, or deviation, of the gob to gob weight readings (green lines) are much improved on the cascade bowl when compared to those on the conventional bowl. On the graph titled Rejects for Thin glass (produced from results taken on the same production line), it can be seen by direct comparison of the two recordings that the average reject rate for the cascade bowl is 0.3 (/3rd) of the average reject rate for the standard bowl. Inserted Spout Spout Bowl www.vesgroup.com North America Ofce
2216 Danube Way Upland, CA, 91784 USA Tel: +1 909 982 5981 Fax: +1 909 949 0301 Czech Republic
Valdstejnska 281/17 460 01 Liberec 1 Czech Republic Tel: +420 48 6131780 Fax: +420 48 6131781 China Ofce Room 1705 Tianjin International Bld. 75 Nanjing Rd. Tianjin, China Tel & Fax: +86 22 3307 1 Fives Stein Ltd. 4A Churchward, Southmead Park, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 7HB, UK Phone: +44 (0)1235 811111 Fax: +44 (0)1235 817676 E-mail: [email protected] Materials The BH-F Cascade Bowl is available in the following: Zircon Mullite, Zircon Free material. or fusion cast AZS Zircon Mullite or Zircon Free material. with Fusion cast AZS or Chrome Insert. Note: Installation Package available for all BH-F 900 Series Feeders and most larger feeder types. The total installation package of the cascade bowl, microporous insulation, burner blocks, and cover blocks (including installation supervision if required) is available from Fives Stein Ltd. Technical Data Forehearth Mounted Spout Layouts