Antenna Azimuth and Its Simulation by Lab View Program: School of Electrical and Electronoic Engineering
Antenna Azimuth and Its Simulation by Lab View Program: School of Electrical and Electronoic Engineering
Project
Antenna Azimuth and its simulation by lab view program
Semester 2, 2009
1. Introduction
2. Antenna Azimuth
3.1 Calculation for the system of constants with and without compensation
5. Program Results
6. Conclusion
7. References
1. Introduction
The control system of the antenna azimuth consists of the armature dc servo motor,
potentiometer, and amplifier.
It is necessary to set the position of antenna by giving the input via input
potentiometer. The real antenna Azimuth output is the system output. Block diagram
is shown below[2].
We have to obtain the constants for the potentiometer, motor and the gears for
modelling the whole system without compensating and feedback.
DC Servomotor
F= Blida Where
l = Conductor length
The conductor is moving in a correct angle with of result of that magnetic field
produce a voltage on the terminals of the conductor which is equal to e= B/ v, where
v is the velocity of conductor which is ordinary to the magnetic field and e is voltage.
The voltage ∝ speed because the current moving armature is rotating in the
magnetic field [1].
dθm
vb (t) = Kb (t) where
dt
vb (t) = Back electromotive force, back emf
Calculate the motor transfer function, putting the earlier equation in the loop
equation:
1 dy
(Ra + Las) Tm(s) + Kb sθm(s) = Ea(s)
Kt dx
Equation connecting with the viscous damping D m , Inertia of the armature Jm with
the torque of the motor:
In Dc motor armature induction La is very less then resistance, Ra with the result of
this the equation:
Ra
[ Kt ]
(Jms + Dm) + Kb sθm(s) = Ea(s)
This is described as a straight line. Tm ∝ wm this plot is called torque –speed curve.
The torque axis intercept occurs when the angular velocity reaches zero. At that
point the torque value is called stall torque T stall. Thus
Kt
Tstall = ea
Ra
When the torque is zero then angular velocity is occurring and it is called the no-load
speed, Wno-load, thus:
ea
Wno-load =
Kb
Kt Tstall ea
= and Kb =
Ra ea Wno−load
Potentiometer
In the potentiometer there are number of turns, N and v is the positive and negative
voltage, v is corresponding to the turn made[2].
V
Kpot =
N∗π
; Where
The potentiometer which is used in the system consist input and output
potentiometer.
N1
Kg = Where
N2
3.1 Calculation for the system of constants with and without compensation
With the help of front panel we are putting the inputs and we are using the digital
control from numeric selection[2].
From the inputs the program can be calculates with the help of formulas:
1 Kt
Km = ( )
Jm Ra
1 KtKb
am =
Jm
( Dm+
Ra
)
Kt Tstall ea
Where
Ra
= Ra
and Kb =
Wno−load
is it achieve by the dynamometer test
2
Jm = Ja + JL¿) ; is it not display in the front panel of the main VI
2
Dm = Da + DL¿) ; is it not display in front panel of the main VI
V
Kpot =
N∗π
N1
Kg =
N2
; is it not display in front panel of the main VI
This program is used to calculate the parameter which is saved in the other VI called
Calc parm.
Figure4: The program diagram for the calc parm.vi to calculate the constant for the
system.
The inputs which is comes from the front panel are preferred percentage overshoot
(%OS) and desired setting time (Ts) with the help of these parameter amplifier gain
and tachometer gain calculated in a very easily ways and in the desired outputs[4].
8
−am
The tachometer gain is; Tsd
Kf =
Km
4 ¿ ln ( %
OS
( )2 OS
√
)
KA = Tsdδ
KmKpotKg
δ=
100
(
( π 2+ ln %
100))
For the compensated and uncompensated system the time response is formed with
the help of generated angular response plotted against the time array through an XY
graph. In this loop is using to produce the output and the formulation for the
uncompensated system is get with the hand computations and for the compensated
system is get with Matlab[4].
C1(t) = d - d
e−t
[
cos
√ KmKAKgKpot
( -(am/2)2 )
1
t + √ KmKAKgKpot −( am/2) 2
¿
sin -(am/2)2 )t ]
Where d = desired azimuth angular position
It is only applicable for the underdamped system and it is not work for an
overdamped system.
Figure9: Part of the program which realises the angular response of the
uncompensated system.
With the help of these inputs function are adjusting the response graph which is
based on the observer choice. These section consists three inputs; accuracy,
observation period and desired angular position.
Accuracy:
The accuracy of the plot is dependent on the difference of the instance and
the instance before
Observation period :
The highest time of surveillance is display on the XY graph.
B) Inputs for modelling the system: The input parameter that are needed to model
the block available in the system. It consists of load,gears,amplifer,motor
and potentiometer.
C) Desired value for the inputs: In this section desired values of percentage of
settling time and overshoot. With the help of these two parameters gain for
the tachometer and amplifier can be calculated. In this section the preferred
values must be in a certain range for the necessary gain and response graph
to be correct.
D) Angular response for feedback compensated structure: The response for the
compensated system and this is better than uncompensated system in terms
of settling time and percentage overshoot.
E) Angular response for uncompensated system: In this the angular response of the
uncompensated system versus time. The uncompensated system must be
underdamped otherwise graph will be not plotted. This corrects the
percentage overshoot which is arising for in the underdamped system.
H) Block diagram: With the help of block diagram we explain the system with
feedback and without feedback compensation. This block diagram are
labelled and modelled. For the potentiometer gain, gear gain and feedback
compensated are accumulated together to simplify the modelling.
5. Program Results
Results are gained for that value which is given in the digital controls of inputs.
Figure 12: The result for desired overshoot of 10% and settling time of 1 seconds.
The value desired is achieved as given in the graph, with the amplifier gain of and
tachometer gain of 2.84 and amplifier gain of 105.487.
The values for modeling the system is the same throughout the results produced
next. If we put different armature controlled dc servomotor or amplifier or
potentiometer is put to practice, with the help of new inputs we can get desired
responses and required gains.
The following results which are presented in the next 4 diagram and it is based on
the required desired outputs;
Figure 15; Result for desired overshoot of 100% and settling time of 3.0 seconds
Figure16; Results for desired overshoot of 0% and settling time of 3 .0 seconds
The program returns an error message which is based on three conditions, the
desired values are greater than the real system arrangements or the percentage of
overshoot is hundred or percentage of overshoot is zero. We can determine this from
the last three figures;
For the 60% of overshoot, a set of gain for tachometer and amplifier is
produced.
For the 100% of overshoot, the amplifier gain is infinity.
For the 0 % of overshoot, the amplifier gain is NA.
The tachometer gains are still available for zero and a hundred percentage
overshoot. This is because the tachometer gain only depends on the desired
settling time given.
Conclusion:
The stimulation of the antenna azimuth and the other component of the system DC
motor is successfully done. The lab view program can especially get input values of
any requirement of the potentiometer, gain amplifier, gears which is considered as
the main advantage in any case the electric motor which is used should be controlled
only by the armature which is a direct current servomotor. So these values should
only guide you to the underdamped position control system. The load can be
changed until the inertia and viscous damping of the load is identified. The
equivalent inertia and viscous damping at the armature has the motor of the inertia
as well as the viscous damping which is for the analysis made on the motor shaft
position only.
.
References
2. Nise, N.S. Control System Engineering, 3rd ed.John Wiley and Sons Inc,
California, 2000
http://www.ni.com/labview