This document discusses the Bishop Piotr Tomicki Chapel located in the Cracow Cathedral and its altarpiece depicting "The Adoration of the Magi". The chapel was built in 1524-1535 and features an altarpiece from this time period showing the Adoration of the Magi. The chapel was commissioned by Bishop Piotr Tomicki, a distinguished Polish statesman and patron of the arts in the 16th century, who obtained works from Italy and the Netherlands. While some original furnishings are lost, the altarpiece and Bishop's magnificent tomb continue to attest to the high artistic level of the chapel.
This document discusses the Bishop Piotr Tomicki Chapel located in the Cracow Cathedral and its altarpiece depicting "The Adoration of the Magi". The chapel was built in 1524-1535 and features an altarpiece from this time period showing the Adoration of the Magi. The chapel was commissioned by Bishop Piotr Tomicki, a distinguished Polish statesman and patron of the arts in the 16th century, who obtained works from Italy and the Netherlands. While some original furnishings are lost, the altarpiece and Bishop's magnificent tomb continue to attest to the high artistic level of the chapel.
Original Title
Miziolek the Bishop Piotr Tomicki Chapel in Cracow Cathedral 2002
This document discusses the Bishop Piotr Tomicki Chapel located in the Cracow Cathedral and its altarpiece depicting "The Adoration of the Magi". The chapel was built in 1524-1535 and features an altarpiece from this time period showing the Adoration of the Magi. The chapel was commissioned by Bishop Piotr Tomicki, a distinguished Polish statesman and patron of the arts in the 16th century, who obtained works from Italy and the Netherlands. While some original furnishings are lost, the altarpiece and Bishop's magnificent tomb continue to attest to the high artistic level of the chapel.
This document discusses the Bishop Piotr Tomicki Chapel located in the Cracow Cathedral and its altarpiece depicting "The Adoration of the Magi". The chapel was built in 1524-1535 and features an altarpiece from this time period showing the Adoration of the Magi. The chapel was commissioned by Bishop Piotr Tomicki, a distinguished Polish statesman and patron of the arts in the 16th century, who obtained works from Italy and the Netherlands. While some original furnishings are lost, the altarpiece and Bishop's magnificent tomb continue to attest to the high artistic level of the chapel.
The Bishop Piotr Tomicki Chapel in the Cracow Cathedral, and
Its Altarpiece Depicting The Adoration of the Magi* Some scholars have noted that Renaissance art in Poland resulted from an interplay of Polish patronage and foreign artists'. Among the numerous non-Polish names, those of such Polish painters and sculptors as Stanisaw Samostrzelnik and Jan Michaowicz of Urzdw are seldom found. Excellent cases in point are those of the two earliest Renaissance funera- ry chapels erected in the Cathedral of Cracow (the Wawel Cathedral). Both the Sigismund Chapel (1517-1533) and the Fig. I Altarpiece in the Chapel of Bishop Piotr Tomicki. Cracow Cathedral Bishop Piotr Tomicki Chapel (1524-1535) were built by Bar- tolomeo Berrecci and were embellished with various art objects produced largely by artists from Nuremberg. Unlike the iconographic programme of the Royal Chapel, that of the Tomicki Chapel has not yet been studied 2 . Its cen- trepiece is the altarpiece depicting Adoration of the Magi, which has been referred to until now only in passing (figs. 1, 2) 3 . As has been confirmed in written sources, that chapel was officially dedicated to St. Thomas of Canterbury 4 . However, due to the subject of the painting, it is sometimes referred to as The Chapel of the Magi 5 . The primary purpose of this paper is to investigate prelimi- narily the significance of the above altarpiece, in the context of Fig. 2 and pi VIII The Adoration of the Magi in the altarpiece of the Bishop Piotr Tomicki Chapel 385 Originalverffentlichung in: Popp, Dietmar (Hrsg.): Die Jagiellonen : Kunst und Kultur einer europischen Dynastie an der Wende zur Neuzeit, Nrnberg 2002, S. 385-394 the tomb of the Bishop and the chapel's other furnishings, most of which are known only through archival sources 6 . Bishop Piotr Tomicki (1464-1535), one of the most distingui- shed humanists and statesmen of 1 th-century Poland, was educated in Leipzig, Cracow and Bologna 7 . He studied at the University of Bologna from 1494, and received his doctorate in canon law there in June 1500 8 . Subsequently, he spent approximately six months at the papai chancellery in Rome. Following his return to Cracow, Tomicki joined first the chan cellery of Cardinal Fryderyk the Jagiellonian and then, in 1 506, became a secretary of King Sigismund I. He was Vice- Chancellor of the Kingdom (from 1515), Bishop of Pozna (from 1 520), then Bishop of Cracow from 1 523 until his death in 1535. From 1523, Bishop Tomicki was also Chancellor of the University of Cracow and founder of a chair of Roman Law. It was there that he encouraged the teaching of Greek Fig. 3 Giammaria Mosca called Padovano, lempietto deriving from the tabernacle commissioned by Bishop Piotr Tomicki. Presently in the parish church in Modlnica near Cracow and Hebrew. Due to his fluent Italian, as well as his habits and his interest in Italian culture, the Bishop was called by his con- temporaries The ltalian (ltalus) 9 . Until the end of his life, he maintained strong links with Italy, ordering books and various art obiects from there. He amas- sed a library of at least five hundred volumes, purchasing them systematically through a number of agents. A considerable number of these books have been preserved and are current- ly housed in the Jagiellonian Library in Cracow 10 . At his own court in Cracow, Tomicki created a centr for the advancement of patristic studies". He strived to attract to Cracow the most distinguished luminaries, among them Erasmus of Rotterdam with whom he corresponded from 1527 until his death 12 . In 1529, the great Dutchman dedicated to Tomicki his second edition of Seneca's writings. Bishop Tomicki was second only to King Sigismund I as a patron of the ars 13 . In the 1 520s, he commissioned for the Pozna Cathedral a tomb for Bishop Jan Lubraski and a ciborium, now lost. In 1533, he ordered another tabernacle for the host, for the Wawel Cathedral. Fashioned of Hungari- an red marble by Giammaria Mosca, known as ll Padova- no, it was installed in the cathedrals in cornu Evangelii in 1536, a year after the Bishop's death 14 . Fragments of that veri- table masterpiece of the Polish Renaissance dismantled in the 1 7th century, including a pair of adorning angels, a relief depicting the Trinity and half of a tempietto, are still preser- ved in Cracow (in the National Museum and the Tomicki Cha- pel), and in the parish church at Modlnica (fig. 3). Tomicki was also a patron of the Polish painter Stanisaw Samostrzelnik who, among other artists in the 1530s, adorned with miniatures the Catalogus Archiepiscoporum Gnesnen- sium et Vitae Episcoporum Cracoviensium 15 . In the last years of his life, the Bishop commissioned a number of votive wax figures for the Wawel Cathedral and the church in Czstocho- wa 16 . The ordering of these items strongly suggests that during his long sojourn in Italy' 7 he also visited Florence. The construction of the Tomicki Chapel, situated behind the ambulatory in the southeast corner of the Wawel Cathedral, had been completed by 1530, but its furnishing continued until the Bishop's death in 1535 18 . With no drum or sculpted deco- ration, it is a simplified version of the Royal Chapel. In place of such ornamentation, it has a beautifully-designed eastern wali with two arched windows flanking the altarpiece and the round window above it. The tomb, fashioned of Hungarian red marble and sandstone by Berrecci's workshop, was ready by 1532 (fig. 4). Apart from his effigy, the Bishop is shown a second time at tne back of the sepufchral niche, adoring the half-length Madonna and Child. From various written sour- ces it is known that, among the now lost furnishi ngs of the Tomicki Chapel executed between 1530 and 1535, there were numerous brasses and a bronze grille with a scen of the Annunciation, commissioned in Nuremberg 19 , and stained 386 glass produced in The Netherlands 20 . No longer extant (or covered with intonaco) were also the murals by Stanisaw Samostrzelnik that adorned the chapel's walls and cupola, a tapestry depicting The Assumption of the Virgin 2 ' and two paintings 22 . One of the latter depicted Saints Peter and Tho mas, while the other portrayed The Crucifixion. Both were used to cover the altar painting during Advent and Lent respectively. Cardinal Stanisaw Hozjusz, in his Vita Petri Tomicii written some fifteen years after the Bishop's death, records that in the entire kingdom the chapel's beauty was comparable only to that of the Royal Chapel 23 . Today, the chapel's superb artistic level is attested to by the Bishop's magnificenttomb (fig. 4), the iron doors leading to the sacristy, some fine marble slabs that once framed the crypts entrance (and which, at present, are fixed onto one of the chapel walls) and, to some extent, the altar with the pain ting depicting The Adoration of the Magi (figs. 1, 2). As for the altar itselr, only its mensa bearing Tomickis coat of arms made of sandstone and the painting date from the time of the chapel's completion 24 . The two columns and the entablature fashioned of black marble are of a much later date. The origi- nal columns were sculpted, and thus were similar to those on the Bishop's tomb. This is confirmed by the Acta visitationis of Bishop Maciejowski of 1602, which also mentions the pain ting. One passage in the Acta reads: in capella versus solis sita ... est altare unicum lapideum cum mensa integra consa- cratum imaginem habens pictam artificiose historiom Epi- phaniae Domini referentem inter columnas celatas duas posi- tam 25 . Above the altar is a relief showing The Trinity surrounded by the heads of winged angels. It was first men- tioned as being in the chapel in 1731. In all probability, the latter came from the previously-mentioned Tomicki tabernacle for the host, commissioned in 1533 26 . The canvas The Adoration of the Magi (measuring 170 x 115 cm) appears to have been parfially repainted (fig. 2). There is no record of its cleaning or conservation during the 20th century. The scen is situated in a building having a large semi-circular arcade through which a landscape with trees and some buildings may be seen. The Holy Family is shown to the right, on the stairs, while the Magi are approaching from the left. In front of Mary, who is seated on a stone bench with the Child, kneels an old, semi-bald King presenting a smali casket filled with gold coins. The Child is dipping his right hand into the casket, while in his left hand he holds one of the coins. Of the remaining two Magi, one, still wearing his crown, is shown frontally, pointing with his right hand to the beautiful chalice-like container held in his left hand. The youngest of the Magi, shown from the back and with his cha- racteristic sabre, is black 27 . At one side of the painting is St. Joseph, standing behind Mary. On the opposite side is a ser- vant of the Magi, pointing to a star that emits three long rays. Neifher the Bishop's abundant correspondence concerning the Fig. 4 Tomb of Bishop Piotr Tomicki in his funerary chapel. Cracow Cathedral furnishment of the chapel (to be found in the Acta Tomicia- na) nor other lth-century written sources mention the sub- ject of the altar's painting. As stated above, it was first men- tioned in 1602. Upon closer examination, this picture appears to be a version of the only partially preserved panel painting of The Adora- tion of the Magi by Georg Pencz, dating from about 1 530 28 . That panels three remaining fragments, housed in the Gemdl- degalerie in Dresden, depict the Black King, St. Joseph and one more witness of The Epiphany. Fortunately, Pencz's painting is also known through a sehr gute Kopie aus der zweiten Hdlf- te des 1 6. Jahrhunderts, as Hans Georg Gmelin put it (fig. 5) 29 . Until 1944, it was kept among the Lubomirski collection in Lvov. It is now housed in a private collection in Switzerland. Its 387 Fig. 5 Copy of Georg Pencz's panel with The Adoration of the Magi. Today in a private collection in Switzerland, formerly in the Lubomirski Collection in L'viv over, the painting in the Tomicki Chapel differs from the Pencz original and its copy in terms of the colours of the Magis clo- thing and the representation of St. Joseph, who is not kneeling to the left of Mary, but is standing behind her. Who was the painter of The Adoration of the Magi in the Tomicki Chapel? Even if Georg Pencz did paint the wings of the altarpiece for the Sigismund Chapel dating from the 1 530s, it is hardly possible to attribute to him the Tomicki can- vas 32 , for it lacks the depth and the grace of the Pencz panel. A certain provincialism in the Wawel painting is especially evi- dent in the treatment of the architecture, which is fiat and sim- plified. Most probably what we are considering here is a ver- sion of Penczs composition, produced by an artist active in Cracow. In this connection, two painters may be taken into consideration. One of them is the already-mentioned Stanis aw Samostrzelnik 33 , Bishop Tomicki's favourite painter. The Fig. 6 The Adoration of the Magi, one of the scenes in the silver altarpiece in the Sigismund Chapel. Cracow Cathedral measurements are 200 x 160 cm, whereas the height of the ori ginal panel is 1 81 cm. Thus the painting in the Tomicki Chapel is smaller than both Pencz's panel and the copy of it dating from the second half of the lth century. Its artistic quality is also considerably inferior. Nor is it executed on a panel, but rather on much cheaper canvas 30 , which - from the second quarter of the 1 th century - was used quite often in Northern European painting 3 '. The Wawel painting is a much modified and simplified version of Pencz's composition in which the pain ter omitted not only the upper part of the original composition, but also depicted only one or the kings' servants, instead of three. The star seen here through the arcade of the building is no longer a shining globe, but a true star emanating three long rays and thus to some degree reminiscent of a comet. More- other is Hans Durer, one of the younger brothers of Albrecht, whose activity in Cracow from 1 527 until his death in 1 534 awaits further investigation 34 . In the last years of Tomicki's life, when the furnishing of his funerary chapel was close to completion, Samostrzelnik ador- ned with miniatures the previously-mentioned Catalogus Archiepiscoporum Gnesnensium et Vitae Episcoporum Craco- viensium. The scenes inspired by the New Testament which are depicted in the Catalogus portray The Annunciation, The A doration of the Magi and The Vision of St. John on Pat- mos (the vision of Mulier amicta sole) 35 . This choice is quite similar to the iconographic programme in the chapel incorpo- rating The Annunciation (on the grille), The Epiphany (on the altar) and the scen of the adoration, by the Bishop, of the 388 Fig. 7 Albrecht Durer, The Adoration of the Magi, woodcut Ma d o n n a and Chi l d (at the back of the t omb) . A s will be shown bel ow, like The Vi si on of St. J ohn the latter scen refers to the symbol i sm of light. However, it is not difficult to see that the style of the canvas in the Tomicki Chapel di ffers consi der abl y f rom that of Samost rzel ni k, sice it is charact e- ri zed by decorat i veness a nd a lack of dept h. It woul d seem that it mi ght ver y well have been Hans Durer wh o execut ed the pai nt i ng in questi on. His late style, empl oy- ed when he wa s servi ng in Cr a c o w as pi ctor regi us after 1527, is still little known. However, it wa s he wh o , in 1531, di d the proj ect of the al t arpi ece for the Si gi smund Chapel , whi ch wa s af t erwards execut ed in Nuremberg 36 . On e of the scenes of that al t arpi ece depi cts The Ador at i on of the Ma gi (fig. 6) whi ch, in addi t i on to its hori zont al rather than vertical composi t i on, reveal s striking similarities with the Wa we l pai n- ting 37 . The anal ogi es i ncl ude not onl y the poses and gestures of the Ki ngs a nd the depi ct i on of the Hol y Fami l y, but al so the archi tecture, and even the star seen through the ar cade. Parti- cul arl y characteristic in both representati ons ar e the Black Ki ng shown f rom the back and St. J os eph standi ng behi nd Ma r y and the Chi l d. Whi l e the iormer ma y have been i nspi red by Ludwi g Krug' s woodcut of The Ador at i on of the Ma gi dat i ng from 1516 38 , the latter seems to have been deri ved f rom Al brecht Dur er s wel l - known woodcut of that s ame subj ect, done in 1503 (fig. 7 p . It shoul d be ment i oned at this poi nt that, in the col l egi ate church of Sandomi er z in Little Pol and, there is a fine, slightly modi f i ed c opy of The Ador at i on of the Ma gi by anot her Ge r ma n artist, Hans Suess von Kul mbach 40 . Unfortunatel y, its ori gi nal desti nati on remai ns unknown. The Tomicki Chapel is most pr obabl y the first f unerary cha- pel in Cr a c ow to hav e had an al t arpi ece depi cti ng The A d o - ration of the Magi . Wh y wa s this subj ect di spl ayed in the chapel and what is its si gni f i cance? J udgi ng from the Bishop' s letters, the content of his l i brary and the gl osses in his preser- ved books, he wa s appar ent l y great l y interested in ast rol ogy and the symbol i sm of light"". Most pr obabl y he wa s al so f ami - liar with some Italian f unerary chapel s havi ng altars or fre- scoes depi cti ng The Ador at i on of the Ma gi . It woul d seem that al t hough the Bi shop, like the Ki ng, f avour ed both Ge r ma n and Italian artists, he wi shed to be buri ed al ht al i ana. In fact, he wa s referred to by his cont emporari es ltalus. A s has al r eady been poi nt ed out, one of the mi ni atures in the Cat al ogus Ar chi epi scopor um Gnesnensi um et Vi t ae Epi sco- por um Cr acovi ensi um dat i ng from the 1530s depi cts The Ador at i on of the Ma gi (fig. 8). Of even greater si gni f i cance for this present i nvesti gati on is the fact that this s ame subj ect wa s i nt ended to ador n a pl uvi al e commi ssi oned by Tomicki in Rome just a year bef ore his deat h. In a letter to St ani s aw of Rzeczyca, his agent in Rome, dat ed Oct ober 3, 1534, the Bi shop wrot e: We request of you that you order on our behal f an embr oi der ed i mage for a >pluviale<. Let it be that the embroi derer pr oduce a port rayal of the hol y three Magi in accor dance with a mor e beautiful pattern instead of the e x am- pl e on the hood [f rom an ol d >pluviale<] whi ch we are sendi ng you 42 . Thus it seems that Tomicki not onl y commi ssi oned a pl uvi al e embr oi der ed with The Three Ma gi (in whi ch he possi bl y wi shed to be buri ed) , but that even earl i er he had wor n a hood ador ned with this subject. Wor t h stressing is the fact that in his letter, the Bi shop refers to the Magi as sai nts. The relics of the Three Ki ngs wh o had read f rom the stars of the birth of J esus a nd wh o had brought him gol d, f ranki ncen- se and myrrh (interpreted as gifts for Christ as Ki ng, G o d and Ma n , the myrrh bei ng consi dered connect ed with his deat h) wer e kept, after 1200, in Col ogne. Yet duri ng the Late Medi e- val and Renai ssance peri ods, it wa s in Italy that the Three Ki ngs wer e most venerated 43 . In s ome cities there exi sted Co mpa gni e dei Ma gi whi ch, at the begi nni ng of each Ne w Year or gani z ed sol emn processi ons 44 . Numer ous t ombs and 3 8 9 Fig. 8 Stanisaw Samostrzelnik, The Adoration of the Magi. Miniatur in the Catalogus Archiepiscoporum Gnesnensium et Vitae Episcoporum Cracoviensium. Warsaw, Biblioteka Narodowa funerary chapels in Venice, Padua, Bologna and Florence were adorned with depictions of The Adoration of the Magi and of the star shining in the heavens, which sometimes had the form of a comet 45 . Since the Early Christian period, due to their symbolism of light and myrrh, scenes of The Adoration of the Magi and The Epiphany were linked with sepulchral art 46 . Some of the funerary chapels (such as that of the Bolog- nini family at San Petronio in Bologna) depict not only scenes of The Adoration, but also the journey or the Magi and their following of the star 47 . From the two Florentine funerary chapels, neither of which was consecrated to the Three Kings (the Magi were not de facto saints, although they were commonly seen as such) 48 , there derive two famous altarpieces depicting The Epi- phany. The first, by Gentile da Fabriano, is from the Strozzi Chapel at Santa Trinita 49 ; the second, by Botticelli, is from the no longer extant Chapel of Guaspare dal Lama at Santa Maria Novella 50 . Tomicki was undoubtedly very well acquain- ted with the Bolognini Chapel in one of the most outstanding churches in Florence, the city where he had spent six years. If he revisited Florence, which he almost certainly did, he may have seen, among other chapels, those at Santa Maria Novel- la and Santa Trinita. It would suffice to look through the preserved books from the Bishop's private library - among them, writings by Ficino and other Neo-Platonists, as well as Durandus' Rationale divino- rum officiorum - to understand that he must have been high- ly versed in the sophisticated thinking expressed in the Medie- val and Renaissance writings on the stella magorum and the symbolism of light 51 . In the chapel, in ortu solis sita, this sym bolism is clearly expressed not only in the scen of The Epi- phany, placed between the three windows that originally were adorned with stained glass - multum lucidum et trans- parens, as Tomicki himself put it 52 , but it is also to be found on the tomb of the Bishop. At the back of the sepulchral niche there is a half-length Madonna and Child, adorned with a standing St. Peter and a kneeling Tomicki - appearing very much like one of the Magi. The Madonnas halo comprises 390 meandering sunbeams (fig. 9) which are not to be found elsewhere in Polish images of the Madonna 53 . However, they may be seen at the crown of the cupola on the tempietto of the tabernacle commissioned by Tomicki, in 1533, for his cathe- dral (fig. 3) 54 . It is hardly possible that this important element of the decoration of both the sacrarium and the tomb could have been infroduced without the Bishops influence. Mention has already been made of Tomicki's interest in patri- stic studies and his friendship with Erasmus of Rotterdam 55 . We may now cite Prudentius' Hymn on Jesus' Epiphany and Erasmus' Commentary on that hymn. It is possible that from these writings, as well as from those of Ficino, the programme of the Tomicki chapel may have emerged 50 . In his hymn, Pru dentius says: The gold and Sabas frankincense Proclaim you king and God; The powder of the myrrh foretells The sepulchre of death [...]. This is the sepulchre where God Allowed his corpse to die, And raised it up from burial And broke the chains of death [...]. Ali people now, come praise your prince, The blessed and the lost, The live, the sick, the dead also - For henceforth none are dead 57 . In turn, Erasmus's commentary reads: ... the Magi were enthusiastic astrologers, and so he [Christ] attracted them by the sign of the star that shone with its own peculiar light... For as he [Christ] was a guiding light, calling us back from the darkness of sin and opening our way to the homeland of eter- nal light. He came down to us to lead us to heaven. ... Let him who dies praise his praise, sice he is being transferred to a happier life. But that way which will lead straight to eternal life should no longer be called >death<, now that Jesus has opened the kingdom of heaven. For those who die in Christ do not die but merely sleep, in bodies that will awake at the voice of the angel 58 . It would be difficult to find a more suitable subject for the altar of the funerary chapel of a Bishop educated in Italy and interested in astrology and comets, in prisca theologia, as well as in the symbolism of light, than the Adoration of the Magi 59 . Fig. 10 The Adoration of the Magi, Epitaph of Canon Melchior Sobek, originally in the Cracow Cathedral The Adoration of the Magi in the Tomicki Chapel was echoed as early as 1542 in the epitaph of Melchior Sobek, one ofthe canons of the Wawel Cathedral (fig. 10) 60 . Not only was this artistically modest panel patterned on the canvas in question, but its meaning, referring to eternal life, is also iden- tical. The painter, an anonymous artist, repeated almosf exact- ly the composition of the Tomicki alterpiece, the only difference being that it is one of the Magi, and not their servant, who points to the star shining in the sky - thus closely resembling that detail in the miniatur by Stanisaw Samostrzelnik (fig. 8). 391 Notes * I wi s h t o e x p r e s s my d e e p gr a t i t ude t o Fat he r Pr e l at e J a n u s z Bi e l a s k i , Mg r . Kr z y s z t o f C z y e w s k i , Dr. K a z i mi e r z K u c z ma n , Dr. Mi k o a j S z y ma s k i , Dr. Mi e c z y s a w Mo r k a a n d Dr. M a g d a l e n a P i wo c k a w h o s e he l p a n d e n c o u r a g - me n t e n a b l e d me t o p r o d u c e t hi s p a p e r . I a m p a r t i c ul a r l y gr a t e f ul t o Dr. Pet er Ma r t y n f or hi s a me n d me n t s t o my Engl i s h. 1 S e e , a m o n g o t he r s , J a n Bi a o s t o c k i : T h e A r t o f t he R e n a i s s a n c e i n Eas t e r n Eu r o p : Hu n g a r y , B o h e mi a , P o l a n d . O x f o r d 1 9 7 6 , p. 2 3 . - T h o ma s D a C o s t a K a u r ma n n : Co u r t , Cl oi s t er s a n d Ci t y. T h e Ar t a n d Cul t ur e of Ce n t r a l E u r o p 1 4 5 0 - 1 8 0 0 . L o n d o n 1 9 9 5 , p. 5 7 . 2 For i c o n o g r a p h y a n d s y mb o l i s m in t he S i g i s mu n d C h a p e l , s e e J . Bi a os t ocki ( not e 1), p p . 3 9 - 4 3 . - Lech Ka l i n o ws k i : Di e S i g i s mu n d k a p e l l e i m W a w e l d o m z u Kr a k a u . In: Po l e n i m Zei t al t er d e r J a g i e l l o n e n 1 3 8 6 - 1 5 7 2 . E x h i b . Ca t . S c h a l l a b u r g 1 9 8 6 , p p . 1 3 1 - 1 3 6 . - S t a n i s a w Mo s s a k o ws k i : B a r t o l o me o Ber - recci a C r a c o v i e ; l a c h a p e l l e S i g i s mo n d . In: Re v u e d e l ' ar t , Vo l . 1 0 1 , 1 9 9 3 , p p . 6 7 - 8 5 . 3 K a t a l o g z a b y t k w szt uki w Po l s c e . Mi a s t o K r a k w [ C a t a l o g u e o f A r t Mo n u - me nt s in P o l a n d . T h e Ci t y of C r a c o w ] , Vo l . 4 , Par t I: Wa w e l . Ed. b y J e r z y S z a - b o ws k i . W a r s a w 1 9 6 5 , p. 9 2 . - J e r z y oz i s ki : G r o b o w e k a p l i c e k o p u o w e w Po l s c e 1 5 2 0 - 1 6 2 0 [ Cent r al F u n e r a r y C h a p e l s in P o l a n d 1 5 2 0 - 1 6 2 0 ] . W a r s a w 1 9 7 3 , p. 4 7 . - K a z i mi e r z K u c z ma n : W a w e l Hi l l . G u i d e - B o o k . C r a - c o w 1 9 9 0 , p. 1 0 1 . - J e r z y Mi z i o e k : O p u s e g r e g i u m a c s p e c t a n d u m. Il t q b e r - n a c o l o e uc a r i s t i c o di G i a n m a r i a Mo s c a , de t t o \\ P a d o v a n o p e r l a Ca t t e d r a l e di C r a c o v i a . In: Mi t t e i l unge n d e s Kuns t hi s t o r i s c he n Insti tutes i n Fl o r e nz , Vo l . 3 6 , 1 9 9 3 , p p . 3 0 3 - 3 3 6 , e s p . 3 2 6 , f i g. 15. 4 I n we n t a r z K a t e d r y Wa w e l s k i e j z r o ku 1 5 6 3 [ l nv e nt o r y of t he W a w e l C a t h e - dr a l f r o m 1 5 6 3 ] . Ed. b y A d a m B o c h n a k . C r a c o w 1 9 7 9 , p. 1 8 8 . 5 J e r z y Ki e s z k o ws k i : P r z y c z y n e k d o kul t ur al nej d z i a a l n o c i Pi ot r a T o mi c k i e g o [ Re ma r k s o n t he Cul t ur al E n d e a v o u r s o f Pi ot r Tomi c ki ] . In: S p r a w o z d a n i a Ko mi s y i d o B a d a n i a Hi s t or yi Sz t uki w Po l s c e , Vo l . 7 / 1 - 2 , 1 9 0 2 , c o l . CCL X X V I . - Fel i ks K o p e r a : J a n Ma r i a P a d o v a n o . In: P r a c e Ko mi s j i Hi st ori i Sz t uki , Vo l . 7 / 2 , 1 9 3 8 , p. 2 3 4 . 6 A c t a T o mi c i a n a r a nk s a m o n g t he mo s t s i gni f i c a nt s uch s o ur c e s , a s it c o n - t ai ns d o c u me n t s a n d t he d i p l o ma t i c c o r r e s p o n d e n c e o f Tomi cki a n d hi s c o n - t e mp o r a r i e s , s e e : A c t a T o mi c i a n a . Ed. b y W a d y s a w P o c i e c h a et al l . , Vo l . I - XVI I , P o z n a 1 8 5 2 - 1 9 6 6 . 7 S t a n i s a w Ho z j u s z : Vi t a Petri Tomi c i i . In: A c t a Hi s t o r i c a Res G e s t a s Po l o ni - a e l l l ust rant i a, Vo l . IV: S. Hos i i Epi s t o l a e , Vo l . 1. Ed. b y Fr a nc i s c us Hi pl er , V i n - cent i us Za k r z e ws k i . C r a c o w 1 8 7 9 , col i . CLI I CLXI X. - Les z ek Ha j d u k i e wi c z : Ks i g o z b i r i z a i n t e r e s o wa n i a bi bl i of i l s ki e Pi ot r a T o mi c k i e g o n a tl e j e g o d z i a - a l no c i kul t ur al nej [ The Bo o k Co l l e c t i o n a n d Bi bl i o phi l i c I nt erest s o f Pi ot r Tomi cki wi t hi n t he Co n t e x t of Hi s Cul t ur al Act i vi t i es ] . W r o c a w - W a r s a w - C r a - c o w 1 9 6 1 . - Ma r i a Cy t o ws k a : Pi ot r Tomi c ki . In: T h e C o n t e mp o r a r i e s o f Er a s - mus . A Bi b l i o g r a p h i c a l Regi st er o f t he R e n a i s s a n c e a n d t he Re f o r ma t i o n , Vo l . 3 . Ed. b y P G . Bi e t e nho l z . T o r o n t o - B u f f a l o - L o n d o n 1 9 8 7 , p p . 3 2 7 - 3 2 9 . - C l a u d e Backv i s : C o mme n t l es P o l o n a i s d u X V I e s i ecl e v o y a i e n t r I t al i e et l es Ita- l i ens. In: Li t er ar y St udi es in P o l a n d , Vo l . XI X, 1 9 8 8 , p p . 7 - 3 9 . 8 J o a n n e s Fi j a ek: Do mi n u s Bar t ol us d e S a x o f e r r a t o e i u s q u e p e r m a g n a i n P o l o n o s a uc o r i t a s . C r a c o w 1 9 1 4 , p p . 7 4 - 7 5 . 9 Vi t a Petri Tomi ci i ( not e 7) , p. CLV. - S e e a l s o : C . Ba c k v i s ( no t e 7 ) , p. 3 4 . 1 0 L. Ha j d u k i e wi c z ( not e 7) . 1 1 M. C y t o ws k a ( not e 7) , p. 3 2 8 . - L. Ha j d u k i e wi c z ( not e 7) , p p . 1 1 4 - 1 1 6 . 1 2 C l a u d e Ba c k v i s : La fortun d ' E r a s me e n P o l o g n e . In: A c t e s d u C o l l o g u e I nt e r na t i o na l e r euni a Mo n s d u 2 6 a u 2 9 o c t o b r e 1 9 6 7 a l ' o c c a s i o n d u 5 0 0 e c e n t e n a i r e d e la n a i s s a n c e d ' E r a s me . Mo n s 1 9 6 8 , p p . 1 7 3 - 2 0 2 . - M. C y t o ws k a ( no t e 7) , p p . 3 2 7 - 3 2 9 . 1 3 J . Ki e s z k o ws k i ( not e 5) . - J . Mi z i o e k ( no t e 3) . 1 4 J . Mi z i o e k ( not e 3) , p p . 3 0 3 - 3 3 6 . - A n n e Ma r k h a m Sc h ul z : G i a m m a r i a Mo s c a c a l l e d P a d o v a n o : a Re n a i s s a n c e Sc ul p t o r in I t al y a n d P o l a n d . Un i v e r - si ty Pa r k 1 9 9 8 , p p . 9 7 - 9 8 , 2 7 1 - 2 7 4 . 1 5 B a r b a r a Mi o d o s k a : Mi n i a t u r y S t a n i s a wa S a mo s t r z e l n i k a [ Mi ni a t ur e s o f St a ni s l a s S a mo s t r z e l n i k ] . W a r s a w 1 9 8 3 , p p . 9 6 - 1 1 7 . 1 6 Ma r i a n S o k o o ws k i : W o t a w o s k o w e f l o r e nc k i e j a k o o b j a n i e n i e w o t w T o mi c k i e g o [ Fl or ent i ne Vo t i v e W a x Fi gur es a s a n Ex p l a n a t i o n o f Tomi cki ' s V o - t i ve Fi gur es ] . In: S p r a w o z d a n i a Ko mi s y i d o B a d a n i a Hi s t or y i Sz t uki w Po l s c e , Vo l . 7 / 1 - 2 , 1 9 0 2 , col i . C C X C - C C X C I I . 1 7 A c t a T o mi c i a n a ( not e 6 ) , Vo l . 1 7 , n o . 3 7 4 . - M. S o k o o ws k i ( not e 1 6 ) , col i . C C X C - C C X C I I . - J . Mi z i o e k ( not e 3) , p p . 3 0 5 , 3 2 4 a n d n o t e 9 o n p. 3 2 8 . - For t he v o t i v e w a x f i gur e s i n Fl o r e nc e a r o u n d 1 5 0 0 , s e e A b y Wa r b u r g : A r t e del ri tratto e b o r g h e s i a f i o r e nt i na . A p p e n d i c e I: St at u v o t i v e in c e r a . In: La r i nas c i t a d e l p a g a n e s i mo a nt i c o . Fl o r e nc e 1 9 8 0 , p p . 1 3 7 - 1 4 1 . 1 8 For t he e r e c t i o n o f t he c h a p e l a n d its a r c hi t e c t ur e , s e e J . oz i s ki ( no t e 3) , p p . 4 5 - 4 8 . - J . Bi a os t oc ki ( not e 1) , p. 4 3 . - For t he t o mb , s e e He l e n a K o z a - k i e wi c z o wa : R z e b a XVI wi e k u w Po l s c e [ Si x t e e n t h - Ce n t u r y Pol i sh Scul pt ur e] . W a r s a w 1 9 8 4 , p p . 5 2 - 5 6 . J 9 A c t a T o mi c i a n a ( no t e 6) , V . 17, n o . 1 9 9 . 2 0 A c t a T o mi c i a n a ( not e 6) , Vo l . 8 , p. 1 5 0 ; Vo l . 1 5 , p p . 4 9 3 a n d 6 2 3 . - J . Ki e s z k o ws k i ( not e 5) , col . CCL X X V I . 21 J . Ki e s z k o ws k i ( not e 5 ) , col i . C C L X X I X - C C L X X X . - J . o z i s k i ( not e 3 ) , p p . 4 5 - 4 6 . - Ma r i a He n n e l - B e r n a s i k o wa : G o b e l i n y k a t e d r y wa we l s k i e j [ Ta pe - st ri es o f t he W a w e l Ca t h e d r a l ] . C r a c o w 1 9 9 4 , p p . 3 6 - 3 7 . 2 2 I n we n t a r z K a t e d r y Wa w e l s k i e j ( not e 4 ) , p p . 1 9 4 - 1 9 6 . 2 3 Vi t a Petri Tomi ci i ( no t e 7 ) , col i . CLXI V. 2 4 Cf . K a t a l o g z a b y t k w szt uki w Pol s ce ( no t e 3) , p. 9 2 . 2 5 A c t a vi s i t at i oni s i l l ust ri ssi mi et r e v e r e ndi s s i mi d o mi n i Be r na r d i c a r d i n a l i s Ma c i e i o ws k i . A r c h i w u m Ka t e d r a l n e n a Wa w e l u , no . 1 9 b , p. 3 1 3 . 2 6 The fi rst me n t i o n o f t he rel i ef b e i n g in t he c h a p e l w a s m a d e in A c t a vi s i t a- t i oni s Ec c l e s i a e Ca t t e d r a l i s Cr a c o v i e n s i s , M S no . 6 4 , f ol . 1 0 2 v o f 1 7 3 1 ; A r c h i - w u m K a t e d r a l n e n a W a w e l u ( A r c h i wu m Ka p i t u y Me t r o p o l i t a l ne j ) . T h e p a s s a - g e r ef er r i ng t o t he rel i ef r e a d s : a l t a r e i n h a c c a p e l l a est u n i c u m vet er i s et r udi s s t r uct ur ae in q u o est i m a g o SS. Tr i um R e g u m . 2 7 For t he i dent i f i cat i on o f t he Ki ngs , s e e J o h n o f Hi l d e s h e i m: Hi s t or i a Tr i um R e g u m. In: T h e T h r e e Ki n g s o f C o l o g n e . A n Ear l y Engl i s h Tr ans l at i on o f t he Hi s f o r i a Tr i um R e g u m b y J o h n of Hi l d e s h e i m. Ed. Tr o m t he ms s . b y Ca r l Ho r s t ma n n ( Ear l y Engl i s h Text Soci et y, 8 5 ) . L o n d o n 1 8 8 6 ( Repr i nt Mi l l - w o o d / N . Y . 1 9 8 8 ) . - S e e a l s o , Y o n a Pi ns o n: C o n n o t a t i o n s o f Si n a n d He r e s y in t he Fi g ur o f t he Bl a c k Ki n g in S o me No r t h e r n Re n a i s s a n c e A d o r a t i o n s . In: A r t i b u s et Hi s t o r i a e , Vo l . 3 4 ( XVI I ) , 1 9 9 6 , p p . 1 5 9 - 1 7 5 . 2 8 Ha n s G e o r g Gme l i n : G e o r g P e n c z ai s Ma l e r . In: Mu n c h n e r J a h r b u c h d e r b i l d e n d e n Kuns t , Vo l . 1 7 , 1 9 6 6 , p p . 4 9 - 7 6 , e s p . p p . 5 3 - 5 5 , 7 5 - 7 6 , f i gs. 1 - 3 . - Me i s t e r urn Al b r e c h t Dur er . Ex h i b . Ca t . Nu r e mb e r g 1 9 6 1 , p. 1 5 2 , no . 2 5 6 . 2 9 H. G . G me l i n ( no t e 2 8 ) , p. 5 3 , f i g. 4 . 392 30 From one of Tomicki's letters (Acta Tomiciana (note ), Vol. 16, p. 645) , it is known fhat Tomicki did not particularly appreci ate painting. In his letter he compl ai ns about the high price of a painting he ordered for the parish church in Tomice and about the i mpermanence of painting. 31 Cf. Di an Wol fthal : The Beginnings of Netherlandish Canvas Painting: 1400- 1530. Cambri dge 1989. 32 H. G. Gmel i n (note 28), pp. 49-76. - See al so Tadeusz Kruszyski: J erzy Pencz z Norymbergi j ako twrca mal owi de tryptyku w Kaplicy Zygmuntows- kiej [ Georg Pench of Nuremberg as the Artist Wh o Produced Paintings for the Al tarpi ece in the Sigismund Chapel ]. In: Biuletyn Historii Sztuki i Kultury, Vol. II, 1 9 3 3 / 3 4 , pp. 179- 216. 33 B. Mi odoska (note 15). - Barbara Mi odoska: Die Buchmalerei in Polen zur Zeit der Jagi el l onen. In: Polen im Zeitalter der Jagi el l onen (note 2), pp. 2 2 4 - 2 5 4 , esp. 2 2 9 - 2 3 0 , 252- 254. 34 Rainer Brandl: Zwischen Kunst und Handwerk. Kunst und Kunstler im mittelalterlichen Nurnberg. In: Nurnberg 1300- 1500. Kunst der Gotik und Renaissance. Exhib.Cat. Nuremberg 1986. Munich 1986, pp. 5 1 - 6 0 , esp. 5 9 - 6 0 : Hans Dijrer auf dem Wawel - Schl oss. - Polen im Zeitalter der Jagi el - lonen (note 2), pp. 187, 2 13- 2 14. 35 B. Mi odoska (note 15), pp. 96- 117. 36 A passage in the Ms. 1035 of the Czartoryski Library in Cracow reads as follows: ltem dedi pro telle uln. 21 super qua delineamentum al i as visirungk tabul ae Nurembergae argenteae f abri candae depictum est... Item dedi l oan- ni Dyrer pictori regio a l abore et pictura delineamenti m. 12 gr. 24. . . Cited afterT. Kruszyski (note 32), pp. 181- 182. 3 7 Helena and Stefan Kozaki ewi cz: The Renaissance in Pol and. War s aw 1976, pp. 9 9 - 1 0 3 , figs. 90- 91. 38 The lllusrated Bartsch, 13 (7). Ed. by W.L. Strauss. New York 1981, 2 ( 536) , p. 300. 3 9 It was Adam Bochnak: Mecenat Zygmunta Starego w zakresi e rzemiosa artystycznego [Sigismund the Ol d as a Patron of the Crafts], Cracow 1 960, p. 67, fig. 57, who noted similarities between Durer's woodcut and the scen in the Sigismund Chapel ' s altarpiece. 40 Jzef Muczkowski - J zef Zdanowski : Hans Suess z Kul mbachu. Cracow 1 927, pp. 2 6 - 3 0 , fig. 7. - The original panel , the one from the church of Sf. Stanislas in Cracow, is now in Berlin, see Gemal degal eri e Staatliche Museen Preussischer Kulturbesitz Berlin. Katalog der ausgestellten Gemdl de des 13. - 18. Jahrhunderts. Berlin 1975, p. 220, no. 596 A. 41 L. Haj duki ewi cz (note 7). - Stanisaw Mossakowski : La non piu esistente decorazi one astrologica del castello reale di Cracovi a. In: Magi a, astrologia e religione nel Rinascimento (Convegno pol acco- i tal i ano, Varsavi a: 2 5 - 2 7 settembre 1972). Wr oc l aw- War s aw- Cr ac ow 1974, pp. 9 0 - 9 8 . 42 Acta Tomiciana (note 6), Vol. 1 6 / 2, p. 270, no. 529: Rogamus vos, ut i am scutum ad pluviale laborari nobis faciatis, quod l aborea phrygi o seu rechamator non secundum picturam per nos vobi s missam, sed iuxta figuram suam sanctorum Trium Regum, quam habet elegantiorem.... - See also: J. Mi zi o ek (note 3), p. 309 and note 9 on p. 328. 43 For the Adorati on of the Magi , see Richard C. Trexler: The Journey of the Magi . Meani ngs in History of a Christian Story. Princeton 1997. - See also Gertrud Schiller: Iconography of Christian Art. Vol. I. Transl. by Janet Selig- man. London 1971, pp. 94- 114. - Erich Depel: Das Klner Dombi l d und di e Lochnernachfolge urn 1500. In: Klner Domblatt, Vbl. 2 3 / 2 4 , 1964, pp. 3 7 1 - 4 1 0 . 44 Rab Hatfield: The Compagni a de' Magi . In: Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, Vol. 33, 1970, p. 107- 161. - See also Andre Chastel: Arte e umanesi mo a Firenze al tempo di Lorenzo il Magni fi co. Transl. by Renzo Federici. Torino 1964, pp. 245- 252, 4 4 0 - 4 4 2 . 45 Richard C. Trexler: Triumph and Mourni ng in North Italian Magi Art. In: Art and Politics in Late Medi eval and Early Renaissance Italy: 1250- 1500. Ed. by Charles M. Rosenberg, Notre Dame- London 1990, pp. 38- 66. - For comets in Italian art, see Andreas Beyer: De significatione cometae. Gugl i el - mo De Becchis Traktat De Cometa (1456) und sein EinfluB auf di e bilafiche Kometeni konographi e in Florenz. In: Die Kunst und das Studium der Natur vom 14. zum 16. Jahrhundert. Ed. by Wol f ram Pri nz- Andreas Beyer. Wei n- heim 1987, pp. 181- 211. 46 Die Hul di gung der Magi er in der Kunst der Spatantike. In: Die Heiligen Drei Kni ge - Darstellung und Verehrung. Exhib.Cat. Col ogne 1982, pp. 20- 32. 4 7 llka Kloten: Wandmal erei im Grossen Kirchenschisma. Die Cappel l a Bolognini in San Petronio zu Bol ogna. Heidelberg 1986. - Darrell D. Davis- son: The Iconol ogy of the S. Trinita Sacristy, 1418- 1435: A Study of the Pri- vate and Public Function of Religious Art in the Early Ouattrocento. In: Art Bul- letin, Vol. 57, 1975, pp. 316- 334. 48 Rab Hatfield: Botticelli's Uffizi Adorati on. A Study in Pictorial Content. Princeton 1 976, pp. 30- 32 . 4 9 Andrea de Marchi : Gentile da Fabri ano. Un vi aggi o nella pittura italiana alla fine del gotico. Mi l ano 1992, pp. 135- 143. 50 R. Hatfield (note 48). - Richard C. Trexler: Captai ns and Kings. The Medi - ci Chapel . In: Church and Communi ty 1200- 1600. Studies in History of Flo- rence and New Spain. Rome 1987, pp. 203- 223. 51 L. Haj duki ewi cz (note 7), pp. 206, 218. - Tomicki's copy of Durandus 1 Rationale Divinorum officiorum is preserved in the Biblioteka Jagielloska in Cracow. 5 2 J. Kieszkowski (note 5), coli. CCLXXVI. 53 J. Mi zi o ek (note 3), p. 326, fig. 18. - A. M. Schulz (note 14), p. 1 26. 54 J. Mizioek (note 3), pp. 324- 327, fig. 13. - Jerzy Mizioek: Ocul us coeli: osservazioni sulla simbologia delia luce nella cappella del primate Uchanius a Lovitium (owicz). In: GJuasar, Vol. 8 / 9 , 1992/ 1993, pp. 5- 18, esp. p. 9, fig. 1 3. - For the Adorati on of the Magi and the Eucharist, see Ursula Nilgen: The Epiphany and the Eucharist: on the Interpretation of Eucharistic Motifs in Medi - aeval Epi phany Scenes. In: Art Bulletin, Vol. 49, 1967, pp. 311- 316. - Wi l l i - am Hood: Fra Angel i co at San Marco. New Haven-London 1993, pp. 248- 253. 55 Korespondencj a Erazma z Rotterdamu z Polakami [Erasmus 1 Correspon- dence with Poles]. Transl. by Mari a Cytowska. War s aw 1965. 56 Stephen M. Buhler: Marsilio Ficino's De stella magorum and Renaissan- ce Vi ews of the Magi . In: Renaissance Ouarterly, Vol. 43, 1990, pp. 348- 371. 57 Hymns of Prudentius. The Cathemeri non; or, The Dai l y Round. Transl. by David R. Slavitt. Bal ti more-London 1996, pp. 54- 61. 58 Collected Works of Erasmus: Literary and Educational Writings 7. Ed. by Elaine Fgntham-Eri ka Rummel. Toronto- Buffal o- London 1989, pp. 196- 205. - The same ideas about the Epi phany and the afterlife occur in several Polish Renaissance Christmas carols, see: Patrzgc na rozmai te wiata tego sprawy. Antol ogi a polskiej poezj i renesansowej [With a Vi ew to Yari ous Matters of 393 This World. Anthology of Polish Renaissance Poetry]. Ed. by Jadwiga Sok- and Monasteries, 2]. Ed. by Izabella Rejduch-Samkowa-Jan Samek. Warsaw owska. Warsaw 1984, pp. 203 and 214. ' 1994, p. 38, fig. 188. 59 In a letter to Sigismund the Old, dated 1 531, the Bishop states: Hic cum rege de me magna fuit disputatio ex declaratione comete, cited after S. Mos sakowski (note 41), p. 91. Sources of illusrations 60 Katalog zabytkw sztuki w Polsce. Vol. IV: Miasto Krakw, cz V: Kazi- Krakw, Pastwowe Zbiory Sztuki na Wawelu: 1; Krakw, Stanisaw Michta: mierz i Stradom, Kocioy i klasztory, 2 [Catalogue of Art Monuments in 2; Warszawa, Polska Akademia Nauk, Instytut Sztuki: 3- 6, 8-10; Krystyna Poland. Vol. IV: The City of Cracow, part V: Kazimierz and Stradom, Churches Dbrowska: 7. 394