IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Special Issue: 10 | NCCOTII 2014 | Jun-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 87
POWER BALANCING OPTIMAL SELECTIVE FORWARDING
SCHEME IN WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS

Devendra Kumar
1
, Soni Kumari
2
, Priyanka Yadav
3

1
Department of Computer Science & Engineering, IEC College of Engineering & Technology, Greater Noida
2
Department of Computer Science & Engineering, IEC College of Engineering & Technology, Greater Noida
3
Department of Computer Science & Engineering, IEC College of Engineering & Technology, Greater Noida

Abstract
Power management is the primary concern in wireless sensor network because the energy is limited. In many cases sensor node
batteries cannot be easily refilled, however in some application the facility is available to recharge the sensor node by other mean
like harvesting node or the energy from environment like solar energy but these are not enough thus we can say that nodes have a
limited energy. Thus it is very necessary to send the message in limited energy. There are two types of transmission non selective
transmission and selective transmission. In selective transmission also different cases are available. Now we are going to shows
the comparative study of different selective forwarding scheme used to transmit the important message to the destination.

Keywords:- Sensor networks, Energy-aware system, non selective transmission, selective forwarding transmission,
Consumption.
--------------------------------------------------------------------***------------------------------------------------------------------
1. INTRODUCTION
A wireless sensor network is a wireless network which
consist devices using sensors to monitor physical or
environmental conditions, such as temperature, sound,
vibration, pressure, motion etc at different locations and
convert these signal in digital signal for further processing
[4]. The position of sensor nodes need not be predetermined.
This allows random deployment means that sensor network
protocol and algorithms must possess self-organizing
capabilities. The major components of a typical sensor
network are: sensor nodes, the sensor field, the sink and the
task manager [2]. Sensors nodes are the heart of the
network. They are in charge of collecting data and routing
this information back to a sink. A sink is a sensor node with
the specific task of receiving, processing and storing data
from the other sensor nodes. A sensor field can be
considered as the area in which the nodes are placed. The
task manager or base station is centralized point of control
within the network, which extracts information from the
network and disseminates control information back into the
network.

Here it is very necessary to know the behaviour of sensor
node. Initialize, sensing, computation, transmit data to
cluster head or sink, go to sleep is basic operation performed
by sensor node [8]. The sensor lifetime is divided into round
and in each round these all operation will be performed and
minimum energy is needed to perform all operation.
Scheduling the event in good manner and using the scheme
which consume low energy is very useful to increase the
network lifetime. There are several sources to consume the
energy e.g. sensing, communication, data processing,
transient, logging, actuation, cluster formation. In sensing
signal sampling, conversion of physical signals to electrical
signals, signal conditioning, and analog to digital conversion
is consumed energy. In communication and data processing
at node also take power. Each sensor node maintains the log
table so the energy used to read and write the data from
memory comes in logging. There are different modes of
operation so the energy used to change the mode (active,
idle, sleep) comes in transient. The energy consumes in
actuation depend upon type of application (depend upon
number of cluster). The energy used to make the cluster and
the operation done by cluster head comes in cluster
formation.

Sensor node lifetime1/energy consumed by sensor node So
the lifetime of sensor node in year can be calculated by the
help of following formula [8]:-

Node lifetime = initial battery capacity/ avg. current * 365 *
24 [years]

The design of physical layer is very important to reduce the
communication cost of WSN [10] so the physical layer
aware protocols, algorithms, and applications are designed
that minimize energy consumption of the system and
individual nodes. There are several energy efficient MAC
protocol [3] and routing protocol [6] with different
objectives were proposed for wireless sensor networks to
minimize the energy by sleep schedules and many more. By
the help of power save protocol we can put the nodes into
sleep mode to save the energy to forward the message. In
this paper the non selective and selective forwarding scheme
are discussed to send the important message. Message
importance is nothing that a priority value established by the
routing protocol or the number given by the application with
the help of important parameter [5]. These parameter are the
available energy to transmit the message, available energy at
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Special Issue: 10 | NCCOTII 2014 | Jun-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 88
node, energy consumed during the different node state, the
priority value of the received message, the behaviour of their
neighbours, some local or non local information etc. Once
the message importance is calculated then the message
transmission decision can be taken by importance driven
decision.

So it is very necessary to take the best decision which
should be energy efficient and be aware of importance of the
received message, available battery, statistical distribution of
the importance of the message (the importance is used to
decide that message will be transmitted or discarded by the
node), behavior of the neighbor nodes are also very
important. There are so many approaches to full fill these
ideas in literature e.g. IDEALS (Information Managed
Energy Aware Algorithm) algorithm [4], decentralized
detection algorithm [9], Markov Chain Process [11] depend
upon mathematical framework to use optimal policy and
many more. The IDEALS algorithm is based upon message
and power priority. In this when the power priority is greater
than message priority then messages are forwarded
otherwise discarded. This algorithm is basically designed for
more important message so low important message is
always discarded to improve the network lifetime. At each
sensor node energy and bandwidth constraints demand
system-level approaches to design that consider detection
performance jointly with system-resource constraints. The
decentralized detection algorithm formulate detection
problems with constraints on the expected cost arising from
transmission in sensor nodes to a fusion node and
measurement at each sensor node to address some of the
system-level costs in a sensor network. Markov decision
process used to decide the optimal policy by the efficient
method.

2. RELATED STUDY
In this section we are going to compare the non selective
and selective forwarding schemes which one is better and
optimal.

2.1 Non selective Forwarding Scheme:
Non selective strategy waste energy for sending low
important message because it uses the epidemic routing
protocol. In epidemic routing protocol the message is
blindly stored (not matter message is high priority or low)
and forwarded or we can say that it broadcasted to
neighbouring nodes [13]. So it consumes most of energy and
expects more energy levels to forward the message. In this
protocol the packet loss is also high so this routing protocol
used in non selective forwarding scheme is not better option
to forward the massage.

2.2 Selective Forwarding Schemes
As we know that epidemic routing protocols broadcast the
message without calculating the priority value so the
selective forwarding schemes come which forward the
message based upon the message importance or priority
value. Here priority value is used to decide the importance
of message [13].

In this paper we are going to study the two different cases to
design the selective forwarding scheme which depend upon
the parameters such as available battery at the node, the
energy used to transmitting a message and the importance of
the message [5]. First when sensors maximize the
importance of their own transmitted messages called
adaptive transmission (AT) and second when sensors
maximize the importance of messages that have been
successfully transmitted by at least one of its neighbours
called local transmission (LF). To measurement of
successful transmission of the message we use two different
success index called zero order success indexes and local
success index. Zero order success index used in adaptive
transmission in which any transmission treated as successful
in any case, and local success index used in local forwarding
scheme in which if the neighbouring node receiving the
message forwards it to other nodes or not.

Here following formula [12] used to calculate the available
energy at time k :-

+1 = 1, (1 )0,

Where 1, is the energy consumed when the node decides
to transmit the message and 0, is the energy consumed
when the message is discarded.

3 SIMULATIONS
As we know that ns2 is the network simulator used to show
the experimental result by visualization [18]. It uses TCL
(Tool Command Language) for front end which generate
NAM (Network Animator) file and C++ language for back
end which write the coding for protocols and many more.
First we create the node then attach the agent (UDP,TCP)to
the node after connecting the agent the traffic pattern
(CBR,FTP) are attached to agents.

So we use ns2 simulator to show the result for forwarding
the message to use selective forwarding policy.

Here we used UDP as agent, AODV as protocol and CBR as
traffic pattern. Table1 show the parameter used in
simulation.














IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Special Issue: 10 | NCCOTII 2014 | Jun-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 89
Table 1 Parameter


Here we take 35 nodes which is placed equidistance. Here
the node 0 is sink node means destination node which
collects the packet to future processing. The node number
11,29,28,6,18 31 is source node which have different
priority message to forward and node 13,16,19,21,20,15 is
selective forwarder nodes which is used as intermediate
node to forward the message of different priority. So first we
show the simulation of the packet forwarded by the source
to destination where the source node, sink node and
selective forwarder nodes are different. Figure 1 show the
different types of node placed at equal distance so here we
do not calculate the shortest path.


Fig1 35 nodes placed at equidistance and source nodes want
to send data to sink node 0
Then after sending the message of different priority the
sensor node battery is discharged. The yellow circle shows
that the battery is discharged in the following simulation
figure.


Fig2 After sending the full priority message the node
discharge

When the message of different priority is send by the
selective forwarding nodes and at that time the battery will
be discharge then it is very necessary to full fill the battery
of another source like harvesting nodes, another node, solar
energy or any other mean. But it is not very easy. This is
very important issue that how the battery will be recharged
very frequently and also it give the reliability that the
message will be forwarded very securely when the battery
will be discharge also. The work is going on in this topic.
Next figure show that the battery will be charge and then
forward the message which is highly priority. Here red circle
show that the node is charging.


Fig3 After node discharge the red circle show the charging
the node again by harvesting node
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Special Issue: 10 | NCCOTII 2014 | Jun-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 90
After simulation is done the next part is develop the graph
which show the comparison of two selective forwarding
scheme called adaptive transmission verses local forwarding
[19].Where the adaptive transmission gives the importance
of their own transmitted message and local forwarding gives
the importance of messages that have been successfully
transmitted by at least one of its neighbours. The adaptive
transmission scheme uses the zero order success indexes and
local forwarding scheme uses the local success index.


Fig4 Here red line show the adaptive transmission and green
line show the local transmission

In above graph the x axis show the number of nodes and y
axis show the energy in joule. Above graph show that the
adaptive transmission takes the more energy to forward the
message and local forwarding scheme takes less energy in
the comparison of adaptive transmission. Here both are the
selective transmission policy to forward the high priority
message.

4. CONCLUSIONS
As we know that energy consumption is very important
factor to design sensor network because nodes have a finite
lifetime or limited energy to forward the messages of
different importance. So good selective message forwarding
schemes are very necessary to increase the lifetime of
network. In this paper we want to create successfully
optimization networks which use the optimal energy
consumption selective forwarding scheme.

So here we compare the two selective forwarding scheme
adaptive transmission (AT) and local forwarding (LF)
scheme which use different success index to insure that
message is transmitted successfully or not. With the help of
graph we can say that the local forwarding scheme increase
the network lifetime to consume less energy in the
comparison of adaptive transmission which takes the more
energy o forward the message.

REFERENCES
[1]. I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E.
Cayirci, A survey on sensor networks, IEEE Commun.
Mag., vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 102114, Aug. 2002.
[2]. Giuseppe Anastasi, Marco Conti, Mario Di Francesco*,
Andrea Passarella, Energy Conservation in Wireless
Sensor Networks: a Survey Department of Information
Engineering, Institute for Informatics and Telematics (IIT)
[3]. Ilker Demirkol, Cem Ersoy, and Fatih Alagz, MAC
Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks: a Survey
[4]. G. Merrett, B. Al-Hashimi, N. White, and N. Harris,
Information managed wireless sensor networks with
energy aware nodes, in Proc. NSTI Nanotechnology Conf.
and Trade Show (NanoTech 05), May 2005, pp. 367370.
[5]. R. Arroyo-Valles, A. G. Marques, and J. Cid-Sueiro,
Energyefficient selective forwarding for sensor networks,
in Proc. Workshop on Energy in Wireless Sensor Networks
(WEWSN08), in conjunction with DCOSS08, June 2008.
[6]. Shio Kumar Singh , M P Singh , and D K Singh
Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks A
Survey International Journal of Computer Science &
Engineering Survey (IJCSES) Vol.1, No.2, November 2010
[7]. A. Wood and J. Stankovic, Denial of service in sensor
networks, IEEE Computer, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 5462, Oct.
2002.
[8]. M. N. Halgamuge, M. Zukerman, and K.
Ramamohanarao AN ESTIMATION OF SENSOR
ENERGY CONSUMPTION Progress In Electromagnetics
Research B, Vol. 12, 259295, 2009
[9]. S. Appadwedula, V. V. Veeravalli, and D. L. Jones,
Energy-efficient detection in sensor networks, IEEE J.
Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 693-702, Apr. 2005.
[10]. E. Shih, S.-H. Cho, N. Ickes, R. Min, A. Sinha, A.
Wang, and A. Chandrakasan, Physical layer driven
protocol and algorithm design for energy-efficient wireless
sensor networks, in Proc. 7th Annual ACM/IEEE Intl
Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networking (Mobicom
01), July 2001.
[11]. Prof. John C.S. Lui Introduction of Markov Decision
Process Department of Computer Science & Engineering
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
[12]. Roco Arroyo-Valles, Antonio G. Marques, and Jesus
Cid-Sueiro, Optimal Selective Forwarding for Energy
Saving in Wireless Sensor Networksh IEEE
TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS,
VOL. 10, NO. 1, JANUARY 2011n
[13]. Mrs. K. ARUN PRABHA 2K. HEMAPRIYA,
ENERGY SAVING IN WIRELESS SENSOR
NETWORK USING OPTIMAL SELECTIVE
FORWARDING PROTOCOL International Journal of
Advancements in Research & Technology, Volume 2,
Issue1, January-2013 1 ISSN 2278-7763
[14]. A. Wood and J. Stankovic, Denial of service in
sensor networks, IEEE Computer, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 54
62, Oct. 2002.
[15]. R. Arroyo-Valles, A. G. Marques, and J. Cid-Sueiro,
Wireless Sensor Networks. IN-TECH, 2010, ch. Energy-
aware Selective Communications in Sensor Networks.
[16]. 2010R. Arroyo-Valles, A. G. Marques, and J. Cid-
Sueiro, Optimal selective transmission under energy
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Special Issue: 10 | NCCOTII 2014 | Jun-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 91
constraints in sensor networks, IEEE Trans. Mobile
Computing, vol. 8, no. 11, pp.15241538, Nov. 2009
[17]. P. Santhiya and J. Bhavithra An Optimal Selective
Forwarding Algorithm for Reducing Packet Loss in Mobile
Sampling of Sensor Field in Bonfring International Journal
of Research in Communication Engineering, Vol. 2, Special
Issue 1, Part 3, February 2012
[18]. NS2 Tutorial Introduction to Network Simulator
NS2
[19].
http://www.compileonline.com/execute_awk_online.php
[20]. http://www.cs.tut.fi/moltchan/modsim/