Massachusetts Bar Review: COMMERCIAL PAPER & SECURED TRANSACTIONS: February 1998 Page 1 of 12

COMMERCI AL PAPER & SECURED TRANSACTI ONS

11 February 1998
COMMERCIAL PAPER

I. INTRODUCTION TO COMMERCIAL PAPER
A. Special Type of Property
- It is neither cash nor a tangible piece of real property
- Ownership status may depend on whether holder in due course or not
B. The Rule
- When a Negotiable Instrument is duly negotiated to a holder in due course, the
holder in due course takes the instrument FREE of All Claims to it, FREE of
All Personal Defenses to its enforcement, and SUBJECT only to Real
Defenses

II. TYPES OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS
A. Promissory Note
- for Example: On DEMAND I PROMISE to PAY to the ORDER of Paul Payee
$50 /s/ Mary Maker
- Promise = I PROMISE to pay
- Parties:
- Promisor = MAKER
- Promisee = PAYEE
B. Draft
- for Example: PAY to the ORDER of Paul Payee $50. Baybank. /s/ Donna
Drawer
- Order: Pay to the Order of
- Parties:
- Drawer = Person GIVING THE ORDER (check writer)
- Drawee = ORDERED to do the PAYING (Bank)
- Payee = Beneficiary of the Order (whom the check is made out to)
- Check: Special Draft wherein the DRAWEE is a BANK
- Indorser: Both Notes & Drafts: Signs on the BACK of the Instrument

III. CONTRACT OR SIGNATURE LIABILITY
- Every Signature is a PROMISE to Pay
- Maker (promisor) Maker Gets sued on the Promise in the PROMISSORY note
- I ndorser: If the Check or Note Bounces AFTER the Indorser Signs, and the
Indorser gets Notice of the Bounce, then the Indorser is LIABLE
- Drawer: Just like an Indorser: If BOUNCE + NOTICE = Liable
- Drawee: DOES NOT SIGN anything, ergo NO Contract or Signature Liability
- Without Recourse: Means NO PROMISE: Indorser NOT LIABLE if bounce






Massachusetts Bar Review: COMMERCIAL PAPER & SECURED TRANSACTIONS: February 1998 Page 2 of 12
IV. WARRANTY OR TRANSFER LIABILITY
- Which Defendants are Liable for a Breach of Warranty?
- ANY Defendant who SOLD the Paper is Liable (if gifted paper away, not
liable)
- Which Plaintiffs may sue the Defendant for Breach of Warranty?
- If Defendant Indorses: ANY plaintiff in possession of the paper may
sue. The Warranties RUN with the Paper
- If Defendant does NOT Indorse: ONLY the Defendants IMMEDIATE
TRANSFEREE may sue. The Warranties do NOT run with the paper
unless indorsed.
- 5 Warranties Made by the Defendant
1. Has GOOD TI TLE to the I nstrument (Bad Title = Breach of
Warranty)
2. All SI GNATURES are GENUI NE & AUTHORI ZED (Forgery =
Breach of Warranty)
3. The I nstrument has NOT Been ALTERED (Tampering = Breach of
Warranty)
4. No Defense or Claimof any Party is Good Against him (if
Unenforceable, the paper is Worthless and it is a breach of warranty)
5. No Knowledge of any I nsolvency Proceeding against Maker,
Drawer, or I ndorser

V. WHAT IS A NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT?
- Fact Pattern will give you a writing. The Issue is whether the Writing is a
CONTRACT or a NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT. To be a Negotiable
Instrument, it must Satisfy all the requirements. Otherwise, it is just a Contract.
- If it is a Contract, it is ORDINARY Property and the Plaintiff is an Ordinary
ASSIGNEE (will lose most actions). However, the Negotiable Instrument is
SPECIAL Property with a Special Plaintiff. REQUIREMENTS:
- Writing: No ORAL Negotiable Instruments are recognized. If oral, may be a
contract though.
- Signed by Maker (note) or Drawer (Draft)
- Non-technical requirement. A Signature is the PRESENT SENSE Impression
to Identify a mark as a signature. Can be virtually any mark on any part of the
paper
- Unconditional Promise or Order
- If the Promise or order is Conditional, then it is a CONTRACT
- Express Conditions: will be in the writing, ergo instantly recognized as
Contract
- Implied Conditions: Are not in writings, and may be part of a Negotiable
Instrument
- Instrument Stands Alone: It may not Incorporate anything Else
- Bad Words: if See governed by, subject to, incorporate by reference, that
means the document does NOT stand alone and thus is a Contract
- Good Words: if See as per that is a Mere Reference, and document STILL
STANDS Alone and is a negotiable instrument

Massachusetts Bar Review: COMMERCIAL PAPER & SECURED TRANSACTIONS: February 1998 Page 3 of 12
- Payment not Restricted to a Particular Fund: Cant say Ill only pay
income from my tax refund. That is a CONTRACT & a Conditional
Promise. Note, OK for a Draft to come from a particular draft account at a
bank
- Sum Certain: How to Tell if it is a Sum Certain?
- Amount Due is ASCERTAINABLE from the WRITING
- For Example:
- $75,000 with interest from date at 10%. Ascertainablefrom writing.
Thus a Negotiable Instrument. Statute Assumes Simple Interest
- $75,000 with Interest from Date. Ascertainable from writing. Thus a
Negotiable Instrument. Use the Judgment Rate of Interest given by
Legislature and that is Ascertainable from the Writing.
- $75,000 with interest from date at 10% plus costs of collection including
a reasonable attorneys fee. Ascertainable from writing. Thus, a
Negotiable Instrument.
- $75,000 at the going rate of interest. Not Ascertainable. Going Rate
=Ambiguous. Therefore it is a CONTRACT
- $75,000 at the prime rate of interest. Not Ascertainable. Prime Rate
is Ambiguous. Therefore it is a CONTRACT
- $75,000 at the prime rate of interest at Last Manhattan Bank. Not
Ascertainable. Writing ITSELF does not show an ascertainable sum
certain since one must obtain other evidence from the Last Manhattan
Bank to determine the Sum Certain. Therefore, it is a Contract
- Money
- The Negotiable Instrument MUST be Paid in MONEY, meaning ANY
CURRENCY, Dollars, Lira, whatever. However, if it is Payable in a
Commodity, it is a CONTRACT. (note, Bar will fuck you by saying franks
instead of francs. The latter is the French Currency, the former is a hot dog)
- No Additional Promises or Orders
- 2 Promises = Contract, 1 Promise = Negotiable Instrument
- Exceptions: Certain Instruments are STILL Negotiable although they contain
additional Information
- References to Security: Even if add a promise about separate security, still
negotiable
- Waivers (even with some waivers, which are additional promises, still
negotiable)
- EXEMPTIONS: Property which the Creditors cant touch
(Defendant may waive this and still have Negotiable
instrument)
- TRIAL/CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT CLAUSE: Defendant
can waive this and still have a valid Negotiable instrument
- PRESENTMENT, PROTEST, & NOTICE OF DISHONOR:
Defendant may waive this and still have a Negotiable
Instrument



Massachusetts Bar Review: COMMERCIAL PAPER & SECURED TRANSACTIONS: February 1998 Page 4 of 12
- Payable ON DEMAND or AT DEFI NI TE TI ME
- On Demand: payable on demand; words such as on demand, at sight, on
presentation
- If NO Time for Payment is STATED, will be a DEMAND. Silence is
Payable on Demand
- Definite Time
- Payable on a SPECIFIC DATE
- For Example:
- On December 1, 1998 DEFINITE TIME Negotiable
- On or Before December 1, 1998 DEFINITE TIME Negotiable
- 90 Days After December 1, 1998 DEFINITE TIME Negotiable
- On December 1, 1998, but this becomes Immediately due & payable if
prior to that time Jim Bakker regains control of the PTL Club This is an
ACCELERATION CLAUSE and they are Valid for Negotiable
Instruments
- When my First Grand-child is born NO Definite Time or on DEMAND,
therefore, Since it is conditioned upon an event, it is a CONTRACT
- Payable to ORDER or BEARER
- Order: The Writing is Payable to Order IF IT USES the Word Order or the
word Assigns in Connection with the Payees Name
- For Example:
- Pay to the Order of Barney Fife: Order, Negotiable
- Pay to the Assigns Barney Fife: Order, Negotiable
- Pay to Barney Fife or his Order: Order, Negotiable
- Bearer: If the Instrument is NOT Payable to the Order, It must be Payable to
the BEARER to be Negotiable
- For Example
- Pay to Bearer: Bearer, Negotiable
- Pay to the Order of Bearer: Bearer, Negotiable
- Pay to Barney Fife or Bearer: Bearer, Negotiable
- Pay to Cash: Bearer, Negotiable
- Pay to the Order of Cash: Bearer, Negotiable
- Pay to the Order of a Hunk of Burning Love: Bearer,
Negotiable (not Order because nobody is named)
- Neither Order nor Bearer, ergo Non-Negotiable
- If the Instrument is Payable NEITHER to Order NOR Bearer, then it will
be a non-negotiable CONTRACT
- For Example: Pay to Barney Fife









Massachusetts Bar Review: COMMERCIAL PAPER & SECURED TRANSACTIONS: February 1998 Page 5 of 12
VI. DUE NEGOTIATION
- When the FACTS Describe the Transfer in the Essay, do the following Analysis
A. Proper Transfer
- Due Negotiation means PROPER Transfer; the Transferee is a HOLDER and
May be a Holder in Due Course. If the Transfer is IMPROPER, then the
Transferee is a mere ASSIGNEE
B. Payable to Order
- If Payable to Order, then the PAYEE Must INDORSE (if forged by non-payee,
then it is a bad transfer and the transferee is an assignee and NOT a holder)
C. Payable to Bearer
- No Indorsement Required (like Cash)
D. Characteristics of I ndorsements
- Special Indorsement: Names Another Payee and therefore requires that other
payees signature to be a proper transfer (i.e., Pay to Order of Andy. Andy then
makes a Special Indorsement to Barney. Require Barneys Signature before a
proper transfer)
- Blank Indorsement: Does Not Name Anybody Else. With a BLANK
Indorsement, the Instrument becomes Payable to BEARER
- Restrictive Indorsement: attaches a condition, like For Deposit Only. If Bank
nonetheless cashes the check, rather than depositing it, the bank will be liable to
the Indorser-payee for CONVERSION.
- Non-restrictive Indorsement: No condition. As soon as Indorse, becomes Bearer
Paper

VII. HOLDER IN DUE COURSE
- When the Facts in the Essay Describe the Plaintiff
A. Value
- The Plaintiff MUST BUY PAPER, Give Value for it. A Gift is not sufficient to
establish Holder in Due Course (unless Shelter Rule). But Giving VALUE for the
Instrument is not necessarily the same thing as Giving Consideration for it.
- A mere Promise is NOT Value. Though a promise is Sufficient Consideration, it
is NOT Value for purposes of establishing Holder in Due Course Status
- Old Value is Good Value: Although past acts are not valid consideration, they
may be good enough to establish value for Holder in Due Course Status.
B. Good Faith
- Pure Heart & Empty Head. What he Actually Knew. Subjective Standard
C. Without Notice
- The Plaintiff Must Acquire the Instrument Without Notice of Several things:
- Defense Against its Enforcement
- Appearance of the Instrument Gives Notice. If Says PAID or VOID, that
is Notice of a defense to its enforcement and thus the Plaintiff may not obtain
Holder in Due Course Status
- NOTICE that the Obligation of Any Party is Voidable means No HDC status.
However, even if there is a Personal Defense against the enforcement of the
Instrument (like Fraud in the inducement), as long as NO Knowledge of it and
No Notice, can be a HDC

Massachusetts Bar Review: COMMERCIAL PAPER & SECURED TRANSACTIONS: February 1998 Page 6 of 12
- Competing Claims
- An HDC must NOT have Notice that the Instrument is Lost or Stolen. If he
knows the instrument is lost/stolen, then he knows of competing claims and
cant be an HDC
- An HDC must NOT have Notice that the Instrument was Negotiated by a
Fiduciary who Breached his Fiduciary Duty. If dont know of the breach of
fiduciary duty, may still be HDC
- Overdue
- Payable at Definite Time: If payable on specific date and obtain it after,
Plaintiff cannot be an HDC
- Principal in Arrears (given in facts): No HDC Status if on Notice of Principal
in Arrears
- Interest in Arrears: Even if have Notice of Interest in Arrears, can still be
HDC
- Payable on Demand: Reasonable Time. Fact Specific. Hard to be overdue.
- Dishonored
- No HDC if Know it has already bounced or been dishonored

VIII. SHELTER PRINCIPLE
- Focus on Plaintiff, again
- Effect: Plaintiff has All the Rights of HDC even though Plaintiff is a DONEE or
TOOK with NOTICE. This Doctrine takes an undeserving Plaintiff and makes him a
Holder in Due Course
- Origin: Old Common Law. Transferee GETS what the Transferor HAD. If the
Transferor had HDC status, then the Transferee ought to have HDC Status
- 2-Step Analysis
- 1. I s the Plaintiff a Holder in Due Course? If yes, Shelter Principal is
inapplicable. Just do a Regular HDC Analysis. However, if NO, step 2
- 2. I s there a Predecessor in Title who WAS a Holder in Due Course? Was the
Previous Holder a HDC? If NO, then the Plaintiff will be a MERE ASSIGNEE,
if YES, then plaintiff will be a HOLDER IN DUE COURSE
















Massachusetts Bar Review: COMMERCIAL PAPER & SECURED TRANSACTIONS: February 1998 Page 7 of 12
IX. RIGHTS OF A HOLDER IN DUE COURSE (& SHELTERED RIGHTS)
A. Takes Title FREE of All CLAI MS to the I nstrument
- HDC owns it no matter what, and the true owner will lose to the HDC
B. Takes FREE of all PERSONAL DEFENSES to its Enforcement
- HDC sues Defendant (signor): Even with a Personal defense, the HDC will win
- Fraud in Inducement
C. Takes SUBJ ECT to all REAL DEFENSES
- HDC Does NOT always win. HDC will lose to a REAL DEFENSE
- Infancy: < 18
- Incapacity: Adjudicated Incompetence
- Duress: Threat. The promise is Void. Must be Extreme.
- Illegality: Illegal Transactions such as Gambling. Promise is Void. Extreme.
- Fraud in the Factum: Misrepresentation about the INSTRUMENT. Usually
Require a Lie + Excuse (since duty to read what you sign). Excuse of Not
Speaking English is OK. Note: Fraud in the Inducement is a Personal Defense as
it is a Misrepresentation about the DEAL. HDC takes free of the personal defense
of fraud in the inducement (i.e., pay $20 for Bronze Medallion of Abe Lincoln)
- Discharge in Bankruptcy: Federal Law, not generally tested.
- Any other Discharge of which the plaintiff has NOTICE when take: On a
Promissory note with lots of Indorser Signatures. If the Signature of 1 indorser is
scratched out, the Taker is ON notice of the discharge of that indorser. May still
be HDC and go after every other signature-indorser-payee on the instrument, but
not the indorser whose signature was scratched out.
- Forgery: A Forged Signature is NOT a PROMISE and is a Real Defense and
Defendant-non-forger is Not liable. Exception; negligent forgery. If left
signature out to the public.
- Material Alteration: Defendant writes a Check to Payee for $100. Payee
changes it to $100,000. Defendant is liable to HDC only to extent of the $100.
Exception: negligence. By Leaving Blanks or lots of space in the instrument or
wrote the instrument in pencil.
- Statute of Limitations. Since this is a Civil Proceeding, Statute of Defense is a
Real Defense. Not often part of a Negotiable instrument essay.















Massachusetts Bar Review: COMMERCIAL PAPER & SECURED TRANSACTIONS: February 1998 Page 8 of 12
SECURED TRANSACTIONS

I. INTRODUCTION TO SECURED TRANSACTIONS
A. Creditor Bargains for 2
nd
Remedy
- Debtor purchases a piece of personal property and signs a Promissory note for the
balance of the purchase price (over the down payment). Suing on the Promissory
Note is the Creditors 1
st
Remedy. That is Negotiable Instruments & Contracts.
But, there is usually a 2
nd
Remedy, which is the right to Re-possess the personal
property to satisfy the promissory note if the consumer does not pay. Secured
Transactions is the study of the 2
nd
Remedy.
B. Second Remedy is Personal Property
- If the Loan is Secured by Real Property, then the Law of Real Property and
Mortgages Applies. Only if the Loan is Secured by Personal Property does
Article 9 of the UCC apply
C. Article 9 of the UCC

II. PRELIMINARY MATTERS: SCOPE OF ARTICLE 9 & DEFINITIONS
A. Basic Transaction
- Extension of Credit Loan or Sale And Creditor Bargains for the 2
nd
Remedy in
Personal Property
B. Definitions
- Debtor: Owes the money, usually has a possessory right to the personal property
while the money is outstanding
- Secured Party: the Creditor
- Security Agreement: Contract between the Debtor and the Secured Party
- Security Interest: A Remedy for breach of the Security Agreement (re-po)
- Collateral; object, the property the secured party can use to collect

III. CREATING AN ENFORCEABLE SECURITY INTEREST
A. Synonymous with Attachment
- An ATTACHED = ENFORCEABLE Security Interest, & vice-versa
- Bar Examiners use both terms interchangeably
B. Meaning of Enforceability & Attachment
- Look at the Transaction between the Debtor and the Secured Party and ask, Did
the Secured Party do it Right?
- If NOT, there is NO Enforceable Security Interest (or Attached Security Interest)
C. Requirements (VCR)
- Value Given by Secured Party. There must be a LOAN or SALE by the Secured
Party
- Contract: It is Called the Security Agreement and there must be one. IF the
Secured Party is in possession of the Collateral, then the contract/security
agreement MAY be ORAL. If the Debtor is in possession of the Collateral, then
the Contract/Security Agreement MUST be in WRITING with a REASONABLE
DESCRIPTION of the COLLATERAL
- Rights in Collateral: Collateral in Debtors Property ONLY (not anothers)
include After Acquired Property Clauses

Massachusetts Bar Review: COMMERCIAL PAPER & SECURED TRANSACTIONS: February 1998 Page 9 of 12

IV. PERFECTION OF SECURITY INTEREST
A. Meaning of the Term: Perfection
- Focus on the Strength of the Secured Partys RIGHTS in the Property when 3
rd

Parties also claim rights in the same property
- If unperfected, will lose to a 3
rd
Party, if perfected, might win over unperfected 3
rd

party (depending on ordering)
B. Three Methods of Perfection
1. Automatic Perfection: a Purchase Money Security Interest in Consumer Goods
- Automatic means VCR Requirements are Sufficient
- Consumer Goods: Debtor uses the goods for PERSONAL and not Commercial
purposes
- Purchase Money Security Interest: The Security Interest Enables the DEBTOR to
Purchase the Property
- A SELLERs Security Interest is ALWAYS a PMSI. (Agree to
purchase a car by paying $1,000 in cash, and promising to pay the
seller $100 per month for the next 5 years. Also sign the security
agreement. That will be a PMSI
- The Security Interest of a LENDER who furnishes the Actual Funds
Used to PAY the Seller is Always a PMSI (Agree to purchase the car
by paying $1,000 down & taking out a loan with GMAC and sign a
Security Agreement giving GMAC a security interest in the car.) That
will be a PMSI
2. Perfection by Secured Party Taking Possession of Collateral
- As soon as the Secured Party takes possession of the Collateral, the Interest
becomes PERFECTED
3. Perfection by Filing NOTI CE of the Security I nterest in the Public Record
- What gets Filed?
- Security Agreement: may be filed, but rarely is because it discloses too much
- Financing Statement: Typically filed. Very Simple Document whose ONLY
purpose is to provide INQUIRY NOTICE to the outside world
- Contents of Financing Statement
- Name & Address of Debtor & Secured Party (Real Names, not Trade names)
- Debtors Signature
- Reasonable Description of the Collateral
- Where is it Filed? Depends
- Consumer Goods: Local Filing at Clerk of Town of Debtors Residence
- Farm Collateral: Clerk of Town of Debtors Residence
- Fixtures: (real estate): Where Mortgage is Recorded
- Everything Else: Central Filing at Secretary of State & if PPB in 1 town,
clerk of the Town as well






Massachusetts Bar Review: COMMERCIAL PAPER & SECURED TRANSACTIONS: February 1998 Page 10 of
12
V. PRIORITY
A. Concept of Priority
- 3
rd
Parties ALSO Claim the Collateral. How does the Secured Partys Claim
Rank? Priority Law Ranks the Interests of Various Creditors
B. Unperfected Security I nterest
- Unperfected Security Interests are WEAK and will rank low & behind 3
rd
Parties
- ONLY parties OVER WHOM an Unperfected Security Interest Holder has
PRIORITY over are:
- Another Unperfected Security Interest: SENIORITY wins (1
st
to VCR)
- The Debtor
C. Perfected Security I nterest
- BASIC RULE: 1
st
in Time, 1
st
in Right. It is a PURE RACE
1. Perfected Security Interest v Levying or Attaching Creditor
- FACTS: The Security Interest is Perfected and then the Sheriff levies on or
attaches the property
- The Perfected Security Interest wins because it was Perfected BEFORE the
Sheriff Acted
2. Perfected Security Interest v Another Perfected Security Interest
- FACTS: There are 2 perfected security interests in the Same Property
- Whether by Possession or Filing, Whoever Perfects 1
st
WINS
- FILING before closing the deal is OK. 1
st
to PERFECT (file or possess)
WINS, regardless of WHO closes the deal 1
st
.
- Exceptions: Certain Commercial PMSI holders will have Priority over a
previously filed & perfected security interest holder. For PMSI-Inventory or
PMSI-Equipment, they will have priority over a Bank or other Security
Interest Holder IF :
- PMSI-Inventory: prior to delivery to debtor, File & Notify other
Security Interest Holder (bank)
- PMSI-Equipment: FILE within 20 days after debtor gets possession
3. Perfected Security Interest v Buyer of Collateral
- RULE: 1
st
in Time, 1
st
in Right. Usually the perfected secured party wins and
buyer gets encumbered title
- Exceptions: Buyer Wins and gets Unencumbered Title
- Sale was Authorized by Secured Party: implied waiver to security interest
- Buyer IN ORDINARY COURSE of BUSINESS takes FREE of
PERFECTED Security Interest in the SELLERS INVENTORY











Massachusetts Bar Review: COMMERCIAL PAPER & SECURED TRANSACTIONS: February 1998 Page 11 of
12
VI. FORECLOSURE: CREDITOR 2
ND
REMEDY
A. Default
- A type of Breach (pre-requisite to this remedy)
- 1
st
a party breaches, then in default, then foreclose
- Statute does not define default, but missing a payment is a Breach/Default
B. Step 1: the Secured Party Gets Possession
1. Self-Help Repossession; Secured Party Must NOT Breach the Peace
- Secured party may re-possession the personal property that is the collateral on
his own so long as he does not breach the peace.
- There is No Statutory Definition of Breaching the Peace, but Secured Party
CANT do anything LI KELY to cause violence(whether violence actually
occurs is irrelevant. Just Likely to cause violence)
- Going in to the HOME of the Debtor is LIKELY to Breach the Peace (cause
violence) UNLESS there is Voluntary & Contemporaneous Consent
- Property outside the home can be re-possessed by the Secured Party unless
the Secured Party Sees the Debtor Objecting
2. Repossession by Judicial Action
- If the Secured Party Cant or Doesnt Want to use Self-help Re-possession,
he/she MUST get a Writ from the Court Ordering the Sheriff to Obtain
Possession of the Property & Deliver it to the Secured Party. In MA, this writ
is called a WRI T of REPLEVI N
C. Redemption
- After the Secured Party has POSSESSION of the Collateral, the Debtor has a
limited right to REDEEM the Collateral (i.e., get it back from the secured party)
- DEBTOR must redeem BEFORE Foreclosure is Completed. After Foreclosure,
Redemption is NO Longer Possible
- To Redeem, the Debtor must pay the FULL BALANCE DUE + SECURED
Partys Expenses (ergo, rarely used since if cant pay a bill likely cant pay the
balance or find another lender)
D. Step 2: Using the Property to Collect the Debt
1. Strict Foreclosure
- Strict Foreclosure occurs when the Secured Party retains the Collateral and
CANCELS the Debt
- Consumer Goods: the 60% Rule: If the Collateral is Consumer Goods and the
Debtor has paid 60% of the loan or 60% of the cash price (if the security interest
is PMSI) STRICT FORECLOSURE IS Not Permitted. Secured Party Must Sell
that property within 90 days or be liable for Conversion.
- To do a Strict Foreclosure: Secured Party MUST sent a Written Proposal to
Retain the Collateral in Satisfaction of the Debt:
- Consumer Goods; Notice is Sent to Debtor
- Other Collateral: Notice is sent to DEBTOR + OTHER CREDITORS
who have NOTIFED the Forecloser that they claim an interest, too
- Right to Object Within 21 Days After Notice Sent:
- Anyone who receives Notice may OBJECT to Strict Foreclosure within 21
days after the Notice is MAILED. Timely Objection stops Strict Foreclosure
and Forces a SALE.

Massachusetts Bar Review: COMMERCIAL PAPER & SECURED TRANSACTIONS: February 1998 Page 12 of
12
2. Foreclosure by Sale
- The Secured Party may sell the Collateral and Apply the Proceeds to the Debt
- Secured Party CHOOSES the Type of Sale; public or private
- Public Sale: public Auction
- Private Sale: any non-public auction sale
- Every Aspect (time, place, etc.)of the Sale must be commercially reasonable
- Advance Notice of the Sale: The Secured Party MUST sent advance notice of
the Sale:
- Who?; Same rules as strict foreclosure. Consumer Goods -> debtor, other
Collateral -> Debtor + other creditors who notified the forecloser of their
interest in the property
- What does it Say?: Depends on the Type of Sale
- Public Sale: Notice States TIME & PLACE of the Sale
- Private: Notice States TIME AFTER WHICH THE SALE WILL BE
MADE After August 1, I will sell it
- When; Must be sent a Reasonable Time in Advance
- Secured Party: May BUY at a PUBLIC AUCTION, but NOT at a Private Sale
(self-dealing is never permitted)
- Deficiency; The Debtor will still be liable for any deficiency. (i.e., debt of
$100,000 & sell at auction for only $60,000. Debtor still liable for that
$40,000). Secured Party may sue the debtor for the Deficiency in An Action
for a Deficiency J udgment







End of Bar Review Now Study like a Hound.