Scribd
Upload
79 views

Software Architecture Testing

This document outlines an assignment on software architecture and testing. Students will be organized into groups of up to 3 students. They will analyze a software architecture using ATAM, ADD, and SAAM methods. They will present their findings and submit a final documentation. The assignment consists of 5 questions analyzing aspects of software architecture evaluation. Students will be assessed based on the introduction, analysis, and conclusion for each question. They must submit a workload matrix and final documentation meeting specific formatting guidelines. Performance criteria outlines expectations and grading guidelines.

Uploaded by

Aroosh K. Masud
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
79 views

Software Architecture Testing

This document outlines an assignment on software architecture and testing. Students will be organized into groups of up to 3 students. They will analyze a software architecture using ATAM, ADD, and SAAM methods. They will present their findings and submit a final documentation. The assignment consists of 5 questions analyzing aspects of software architecture evaluation. Students will be assessed based on the introduction, analysis, and conclusion for each question. They must submit a workload matrix and final documentation meeting specific formatting guidelines. Performance criteria outlines expectations and grading guidelines.

Uploaded by

Aroosh K. Masud
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Software Architecture and Testing CT059-3.

5-2Assignment Page 1 of 3
ASIA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND
INNOVATION
Level 2
CT059-3.5-2 - Sof!"#e A#$%&e$'#e "() Te*&(+
A**&+(,e(
Le"#(&(+ O'$o,e
1. Decide the aims and o!ecti"es# de$i"era$es and sco%e of t&%ica$ 'T Software
architectura$ st&$es.
2. ("a$uate and de%$o& a software architecture for a software de"e$o%ment %ro!ect
3. Ana$&)e the software architecture using ATA*# A+'D and SAA*.
Ho! o -#o$ee) !&% .o'# "**&+(,e(/
o ,rganise &ourse$"es into grou%s of not more than 3 students.
o Answer a$$ -uestions.
o .or/ with &our grou%.
o 'n wee/ 13# &ou wi$$ $ead a %resentation to %resent &our findings and considered
o%inions to &our $ecturer and &our %eers.
o 'n the wee/ fo$$owing &our %resentation# sumit a fina$ documentation of &our
findings and considered o%inions.
Re*e"#$% 0'e*&o(*
1. Thin/ of a s&stem that is not &et read& for an architecture e"a$uation. .hat is it
aout the s&stem that made &ou choose it0 Can &ou genera$ise &our answer to
esta$ish criteria for whether or not a %ro!ect is read& for an architecture
e"a$uation0
2. ,ne of the enefits the c$ient %ercei"ed from ATA* e1ercise was the chance to
achie"e consensus among the sta/eho$ders aout which s&stem enhancement to
tac/$e first. Su%%ose that was &our on$& goa$. Pro%ose a new method# ca$$ed
Sta/eho$der Consensus +ea$isation Ana$&sis *ethod 2SC+A*3# and define its
ste%s# %hases# %artici%ants and artifacts.
3. The SAA* is a re$ati"e$& sim%$e architecture e"a$uation method that was created
to o%erationa$ise the "ague c$aims of modifiai$it&# roustness# %ortai$it& and so
forth that %eo%$e t&%ica$$& ma/e for their architecture. P$an an im%$ementation
strateg& using SAA* for &our software architecture e"a$uation. C$ear$& identif&
and e"a$uate the ste%s in"o$"ed.
4. Pic/ a design from &our software de"e$o%ment %ro!ects and wa$/ through a sma$$
A+'D e1ercise on it. 'dentif& the designer who wou$d re%resent it during the
re"iew. Choose the sta/eho$der &ou wou$d want to re"iew. Pro%ose a set of
scenarios that e1em%$if& its usage.
5e"e$ 2 Asia Pacific 6ni"ersit& of Techno$og& 7 'nno"ation
Software Architecture and Testing CT059-3.5-2Assignment Page 2 of 3
A**e**,e( C#&e#&"
(ach -uestion carries 25 mar/s. (ach -uestion wi$$ e assessed on the fo$$owing criteria8
1. 'ntroduction 25 mar/s3
2. *aturit& of arguments 9 e1%$anation# !ustification# usage of e1am%$es and etc.
215 mar/s3
3. Conc$usion and recommendation 25 mar/s3
The wor/$oad matri1 shou$d indicate the contriution of each indi"idua$ for each re-uired
-uestion 2shown in :age form3 and shou$d e signed off & each team memer. 't is
ad"isa$e for a$$ grou% memers to contriute in a$$ -uestions.
Sam%$e .or/$oad *atri1
;o. Descri%tion Student 1 Student 2 Student 3
1 <uestion 1 100:
2 <uestion 2 100:
3 <uestion 3 100:
4 <uestion 4 100:
Signature
=ina$ Documentation
The fina$ documentation of &our assignment shou$d e a com inding co%& with an
a%%ro%riate cover page stating8
APU Logo
Subject title
Topic of assignment
Intake code
Your group No.
Student I number.
To address the su!ect satisfactori$& for each -uestion $ength shou$d e a ma1imum of
1#500 words >e1c$uding diagrams and a%%endices?. The documentation has to e word-
%rocessed# %rinted on sing$e side A4 si)e %a%er with 1.5 $ine s%acing.
@ou wi$$ (o e assessed on %resentation s/i$$s. .e are $oo/ing %rimari$& for -ua$it& of
research# su%%orting e"idence for &our arguments# and mature "a$ue !udgements aout the
assignmentAs su!ect matter.
5e"e$ 2 Asia Pacific 6ni"ersit& of Techno$og& 7 'nno"ation
Software Architecture and Testing CT059-3.5-2Assignment Page 3 of 3
Performance !riteria
Brade Assessment Buide$ines
Benera$ Pass answers are e1%ected to e $egi$e# tid&# we$$ organised and written
in c$ear# understanda$e (ng$ish. Students who gross$& e1ceed the word
$imit wi$$ e %ena$i)ed.
0-49: Su%erficia$ ana$&sis# conce%ts and $anguage of the su!ect are asent or
scant. 'rre$e"ant regurgitation of te1t oo/. 'deas are %oor$& e1%ressed.
*an& /e& issues are ignored. Conce%ts and $anguage of the su!ect are
used ut are often confused in a%%$ication and or e1%$anation. Some /e&
issues are ignored.
50-C4: Some understanding of the re$e"ant mode$s and conce%ts. Some e$ements
of an a%%ro%riate structure are %resent. +estricted ana$&sis of some issues.
C5-D4: ("idence of reading and research. 6nderstanding of the a%%$ication of
a%%ro%riate mode$s and conce%ts is demonstrated. Ee& issues are
identified and ana$&sed# a$though this ma& e restricted at times. Some
sources are ac/now$edged.
D5-D9: ("idence of wider reading. The assignment effecti"e$& inter%rets the
information and e1hiits the integration of ideas across the su!ect area.
The assignment has credi$e recommendations. A s&stematic a%%roach to
de"e$o%ment and e"a$uation is used. *ost sources are ac/now$edged and
referenced using Far"ard s&stem.
G0: and
ao"e
Arguments are c$ear and con"incing. Confident integration of theor& and
%ractices is demonstrated. Consistent referencing to sources using the
Far"ard s&stem.
5e"e$ 2 Asia Pacific 6ni"ersit& of Techno$og& 7 'nno"ation

You might also like