Developing

Early Warning Systems:

A Checklist
EWC III
Third International Conference
on Early Warning
From concept to action
27 29 March 2006, Bonn, Germany
ewcIII_CL_cover_rz_druck.indd 1 23.05.2006, 11:08:29
FOREWORD
Early warning is a major element of disaster risk
reduction. It prevents loss of life and reduces
the economic and material impact of disasters.
To be effective, early warning systems need to
actively involve the communities at risk,
facilitate public education and awareness of
risks, effectively disseminate messages and
warnings and ensure there is constant state of
preparedness.
In January 2005, the World Conference on
Disaster Reduction adopted the Hyogo
Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the
Resilience of Nations and Communities to
Disasters. This included clear references to the
importance of early warning, and encouraged
the development of early warning systems that
are people centred, in particular systems whose
warnings are timely and understandable to
those at risk () including guidance on how to
act upon warnings () (para. 17, ii.d.9).
The Third International Conference on Early
Warning (EWC III) held in Bonn, Germany from
27-29 March 2006 provided the opportunity to
present new and innovative early warning
projects and to discuss natural hazards and
risks around the world and how their impacts
can be minimised through the implementation of
people-centred early warning. The present
document Developing Early Warning Systems:
A Checklist was developed as a conference
outcome, to both inform and draw upon the
discussions and practical examples raised
during the conference, and to support the
implementation of the early warning
components of the Hyogo Framework for
Action.
The Checklist, which is structured around the
four key elements of effective early warning
systems, aims to be a simple list of the main
elements and actions that national governments
or community organizations can refer to when
developing or evaluating early warning systems,
or simply checking that crucial procedures are
in place. It is not intended to be a
comprehensive design manual, but instead a
practical, non-technical reference tool to ensure
that the major elements of a good early warning
system are in place.
Acknowledgements
The Checklist was initiated by the secretariat of
the Third International Conference on Early
Warning with the financial support of the
Government of Germany. The project was
undertaken by consultant Alison Wiltshire,
based at the ISDR Platform for the Promotion of
Early Warning (PPEW) in Bonn. In addition to
information gathered during the two and a half
days of the conference, significant substantive
input was received from organizations and
individuals involved in early warning and
disaster risk reduction, in the United Nations
international system and beyond.
Appreciation and thanks are extended to all
contributors to this collective exercise, including
the participants and project presenters of the
Third International Conference on Early
Warning who openly shared their views,
concerns and practical experiences on how we
can achieve effective early warning systems
which place people at their core.
Countries that develop policy legislative
and institutional frameworks for disaster
risk reduction and that are able to
develop and track progress through
specific and measurable indicators have
greater capacity to manage risks and to
achieve widespread consensus for,
engagement in, and compliance with
disaster risk reduction measures across
all sectors of society.
Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015:
Building the Resilience of Nations and
Communities to Disasters, Paragraph 16.
1
WHATS INSIDE
This document aims to present a short, simple
checklist of basic elements, actions and good
practices associated with effective early
warning systems. It is intended to be a non-
technical reference tool rather than an
extensive how to list for the design of early
warning systems.
How to Use the Checklist
The document is broken into two inter-related
parts that should be read in order. The first
section provides useful background information
and overarching issues important to early
warning. The second part is a series of
practical checklists of actions and initiatives
that should be considered when developing or
evaluating early warning systems.
1. Key elements of early warning, cross-
cutting issues and actors involved in
early warning
A brief section on the four elements of early
warning: risk knowledge; technical monitoring
and warning service; communication and
dissemination of warnings; and community
response capability is included to emphasize
the major components that comprise an
effective people-centred early warning system,
and why each is important.
In addition to the four elements, a number of
crosscutting issues that are critical to the
development and sustainability of effective
early warning systems have been outlined.
These include effective governance and
institutional arrangements, a multi-hazard
approach to early warning, involvement of local
communities and consideration of gender
perspective and cultural diversity.
An explanation of the main actors involved in
early warning activities, and their roles and
responsibilities, is included to provide some
context and further background to the list of
key actors presented at the beginning of each
of the checklists.
2. A checklist of practical actions to assist
in developing, evaluating or refining an
early warning system
For ease of use and practicality, an individual
checklist has been developed for each of the
four elements of early warning. An additional
checklist has also been prepared on the cross-
cutting issue of governance and institutional
arrangements due to the importance of this
issue to the sustainability and cohesiveness of
effective early warning systems.
Each of the checklists is grouped under a
series of major themes and includes a simple
list of actions or steps that, if followed, will
provide a solid basis upon which to build or
assess an early warning system.
Much has been learnt from the creative
disaster prevention efforts of poor
communities in developing countries.
Prevention policy is too important to be
left to governments and international
agencies alone. To succeed, it must also
engage civil society, the private sector
and the media.
Kofi Annan
UN Secretary-General
International Decade for Natural Disaster
Reduction (IDNDR) Programme Forum
Geneva, July 1999
2
Four Elements of People-centred Early Warning
Systems
Source: UN/ISDR Platform for the Promotion of Early Warning
PEOPLE-CENTRED EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS
1. The Key Elements
The objective of people-centred early warning
systems is to empower individuals and
communities threatened by hazards to act in
sufficient time and in an appropriate manner to
reduce the possibility of personal injury, loss of
life and damage to property and the
environment.
A complete and effective early warning system
comprises four inter-related elements, spanning
knowledge of hazards and vulnerabilities
through to preparedness and capacity to
respond. Best practice early warning systems
also have strong inter-linkages and effective
communication channels between all of the
elements.
Risk Knowledge
Risks arise from the combination of hazards
and vulnerabilities at a particular location.
Assessments of risk require systematic
collection and analysis of data and should
consider the dynamic nature of hazards and
vulnerabilities that arise from processes such as
urbanization, rural land-use change,
environmental degradation and climate change.
Risk assessments and maps help to motivate
people, prioritise early warning system needs
and guide preparations for disaster prevention
and responses.
Monitoring and Warning Service
Warning services lie at the core of the system.
There must be a sound scientific basis for
predicting and forecasting hazards and a
reliable forecasting and warning system that
operates 24 hours a day. Continuous monitoring
of hazard parameters and precursors is
essential to generate accurate warnings in a
timely fashion. Warning services for different
hazards should be coordinated where possible
to gain the benefit of shared institutional,
procedural and communication
networks.
Dissemination and Communication
Warnings must reach those at risk. Clear
messages containing simple, useful information
are critical to enable proper responses that will
help safeguard lives and livelihoods. Regional,
national and community level communication
systems must be pre-identified and appropriate
authoritative voices established. The use of
multiple communication channels is necessary
to ensure as many people as possible are
warned, to avoid failure of any one channel, and
to reinforce the warning message.
Response Capability
It is essential that communities understand their
ri sks; respect the warning service and know
how to react. Education and preparedness
programmes play a key role. It is also essential
that disaster management plans are in place,
well practiced and tested. The community
should be well informed on options for safe
behaviour, available escape routes, and how
best to avoid damage and loss to property.
3
2. Cross-cutting Issues
There are a range of overarching issues that
should be taken into account when designing
and maintaining effective early warning
systems.
Effective Governance and Institutional
Arrangements
Well-developed governance and institutional
arrangements support the successful
development and sustainability of sound early
warning systems. They are the foundations
upon which the previously outlined four
elements of early warning are built,
strengthened and maintained.
Good governance is encouraged by robust legal
and regulatory frameworks and supported by
long-term political commitment and effective
institutional arrangements. Effective
governance arrangements should encourage
local decision-making and participation which
are supported by broader administrative and
resource capabilities at the national or regional
level.
Vertical and horizontal communication and
coordination between early warning
stakeholders should also be established.
A Multi-Hazard Approach
Where possible, early warning systems should
link all hazard-based systems. Economies of
scale, sustainability and efficiency can be
enhanced if systems and operational activities
are established and maintained within a multi-
purpose framework that considers all hazards
and end user needs.
Multi-hazard early warning systems will also be
activated more often than a single-hazard
warning system, and therefore should provide
better functionality and reliability for dangerous
high intensity events, such as tsunamis, that
occur infrequently. Multi-hazard systems also
help the public better understand the range of
risks they face and reinforce desired
preparedness actions and warning response
behaviours.
Involvement of Local Communities
People-centred early warning systems rely on
the direct participation of those most likely to be
exposed to hazards. Without the involvement of
local authorities and communities at risk,
government and institutional interventions and
responses to hazard events are likely to be
inadequate.
A local, bottom-up approach to early warning,
with the active participation of local
communities, enables a multi-dimensional
response to problems and needs. In this way,
local communities, civic groups and traditional
structures can contribute to the reduction of
vulnerability and to the strengthening of local
capacities.
Consideration of Gender Perspectives and
Cultural Diversity
In developing early warning systems it is
essential to recognize that different groups have
different vulnerabilities according to culture,
gender or other characteristics that influence
their capacity to effectively prepare for, prevent
and respond to disasters. Women and men
often play di fferent roles in society and have
different access to information in disaster
situations. In addition, the elderly, disabled and
socio-economically disadvantaged are often
more vulnerable.
Information, institutional arrangements and
warning communication systems should be
tailored to meet the needs of every group in
every vulnerable community.
4
3. Key Actors
Developing and implementing an effective early
warning system requires the contribution and
coordination of a diverse range of individuals
and groups. The following list provides a brief
explanation of the types of organizations and
groups that should be involved in early warning
systems and their functions and responsibilities.
Communities, particularly those most
vulnerable, are fundamental to people-centred
early warning systems. They should be actively
involved in all aspects of the establishment and
operation of early warning systems; be aware of
the hazards and potential impacts to which they
are exposed; and be able to take actions to
minimize the threat of loss or damage.
Local governments, like communities and
individuals, are at the centre of effective early
warning systems. They should be empowered
by national governments, have considerable
knowledge of the hazards to which their
communities are exposed and be actively
involved in the design and maintenance of early
warning systems. They must understand
advisory information received and be able to
advise, instruct and engage the local population
in a manner that increases public safety and
reduces the possible loss of resources on which
the community depends.
National governments are responsible for
high-level policies and frameworks that facilitate
early warning and for the technical systems that
predict and issue national hazard warnings.
National governments should interact with
regional and international governments and
agencies to strengthen early warning capacities
and ensure that warnings and related
responses are directed towards the most
vulnerable populations. The provision of support
to local communities and governments to
develop operational capabilities is also an
essential function.
Regional institutions and organizations play
a role in providing specialized knowledge and
advice which supports national efforts to
develop and sustain early warning capabilities
in countries that share a common geographical
environment. In addition, they encourage
linkages with international organizations and
facilitate effective early warning practices
among adjacent countries.
I nternational bodies can provide international
coordination, standardization, and support for
national early warning activities and foster the
exchange of data and knowledge between
individual countries and regions. Support may
include the provision of advi sory information,
technical assistance, and policy and
organizational support necessary to aid the
development and operational capabilities of
national authorities or agencies.
Non-governmental organisations play a role
in raising awareness among individuals,
communities and organizations involved in early
warning, particularly at the community level.
They can also assist with implementing early
warning systems and in preparing communities
for natural disasters. In addition, they can play
an important advocacy role to help ensure that
early warning stays on the agenda of
government policy makers.
The private sector has a diverse role to play in
early warning, including developing early
warning capabilities in their own organizations.
The media plays a vital role in improving the
disaster consciousness of the general
population and disseminating early warnings.
The private sector also has a large untapped
potential to help provide skilled services in form
of technical manpower, know-how or donations
(in-kind and cash) of goods or services.
The science and academic community has a
critical role in providing specialized scientific
and technical input to assist governments and
communities in developing early warning
systems. Their expertise is central to analysing
natural hazard risks facing communities,
supporting the design of scientific and
systematic monitoring and warning services,
supporting data exchange, translating scientific
or technical information into comprehensible
messages, and to the disseminati on of
understandable warnings to those at risk.
5
Key Element 1: RISK KNOWLEDGE
Aim: Establish a systematic, standardized process to collect, assess and share data, maps and trends
on hazards and vulnerabilities.
Key Actors
International, national and local disaster management agencies; meteorological and hydrological
organizations; geophysical experts; social scientists; engineers; land use and urban planners;
researchers and academics; organizations and community representatives involved in disaster
management; international and UN agencies such as WMO, UN/ISDR, UNEP, UNU-EHS, UNOSAT,
UNDP, FAO, UNESCO.
Checklist
1. Organizational Arrangements Established
Key national government agencies involved in
hazard and vulnerability assessments
identified and roles clarified (e.g. agencies
responsible for economic data, demographic
data, land use planning, social data etc).
Responsibility for coordinating hazard
identification, vulnerability and risk
assessment assigned to one national
organization.
Legislation or government policy mandating
the preparation of hazard and vulnerability
maps for all communities in place.
National standards for the systematic
collection, sharing and assessment of hazard
and vulnerability data developed, and
standardized with neighbouring or regional
countries, where appropriate.
Process for scientific and technical experts to
assess and review the accuracy of risk data
and information developed.
Strategy to actively engage communities in
local hazard and vulnerability analyses
developed.
Process to review and update risk data each
year, and include information on any new or
emerging vulnerabilities and hazards
established.
2. Natural Hazards Identified
Characteristics of key natural hazards (e.g.
intensity, frequency and probability) analysed
and historical data evaluated.
Hazard maps developed to identify the
geographical areas and communities that
could be affected by natural hazards.
An integrated hazard map developed (where
possible) to assess the interaction of multiple
natural hazards.
3. Community Vulnerability Analysed
Community vulnerability assessments
conducted for all relevant natural hazards.
Historical data sources and potential future
hazard events considered in vulnerability
assessments.
Factors such as gender, disability, access to
infrastructure, economic diversity and
environmental sensitivities considered.
Vulnerabilities documented and mapped (e.g.
people or communities along coastlines
identified and mapped).
4. Risks Assessed
Interaction of hazards and vulnerabilities
assessed to determine the risks faced by
each region or community.
Community and industry consultation
conducted to ensure risk information is
comprehensive and includes historical and
indigenous knowledge, and local information
and national level data.
Activities that increase risks identified and
evaluated.
Results of risks assessment integrated into
local risk management plans and warning
messages.
5. Information Stored and Accessible
Central library or GIS database established
to store all disaster and natural hazard risk
information.
Hazard and vulnerability data available to
government, the public and the international
community (where appropriate).
Maintenance plan developed to keep data
current and updated.
6
Key Element 2: MONITORING AND WARNING SERVICE
Aim: Establish an effective hazard monitoring and warning service with a sound scientific and
technological basis.
Key Actors
National meteorological and hydrological services; specialised observatory and warning centres (e.g.
for water, volcano); universities and research institutes; private sector equipment suppliers;
telecommunications authorities; quality management experts; regional technical centres; UN agencies
such as UN/ISDR, WMO, FAO, UNESCO, UNEP, UNOSAT, OCHA, ITU.
Checklist
1. Institutional Mechanisms Established
Standardized process, and roles and
responsibilities of all organizations generating
and issuing warnings established and
mandated by law.
Agreements and interagency protocols
established to ensure consistency of warning
language and communication channels where
different hazards are handled by different
agencies.
An all-hazard plan to obtain mutual
efficiencies and effectiveness among different
warning systems established.
Warning system partners, including local
authorities, aware of which organizations are
responsible for warnings.
Protocols in place to define communication
responsibilities and channels for technical
warning services.
Communication arrangements with
international and regional organizations
agreed and operational.
Regional agreements, coordination
mechanisms and specialized centres in place
for regional concerns such as tropical
cyclones, floods in shared basins, data
exchange, and technical capacity building.
Warning system subjected to system-wide
tests and exercises at least once each year.
A national all-hazards committee on technical
warning systems in place and linked to
national disaster management and reduction
authorities, including the national platform for
disaster risk reduction.
System established to verify that warnings
have reached the intended recipients.
Warning centres staffed at all times (24 hours
per day, seven days per week).
2. Monitoring Systems Developed
Measurement parameters and specifications
documented for each relevant hazard.
Plans and documents for monitoring networks
available and agreed with experts and
relevant authorities.
Technical equipment, suited to local
conditions and circumstances, in place and
personnel trained in its use and maintenance.
Applicable data and analysis from regional
networks, adjacent territories and
international sources accessible.
Data received, processed and available in
meaningful formats in real time, or near-real
time.
Strategy in place for obtaining, reviewing and
disseminating data on vulnerabilities
associated with relevant hazards.
Data routinely archived and accessible for
verification and research purposes.
3. Forecasting and Warning Systems
Established
Data analysis, prediction and warning
generation based on accepted scientific and
technical methodologies.
Data and warning products issued within
international standards and protocols.
Warning analysts trained to appropriate
international standards.
Warning centres equipped with appropriate
equipment needed to handle data and run
prediction models.
Fail-safe systems in place, such as power
back-up, equipment redundancy and on-call
personnel systems.
Warnings generated and disseminated in an
efficient and timely manner and in a format
suited to user needs.
Plan implemented to routinely monitor and
evaluate operational processes, including
data quality and warning performance.
7
Key Element 3: DISSEMINATION AND COMMUNICATION
Aim: Develop communication and dissemination systems to ensure people and communities are
warned in advance of impending natural hazard events and facilitate national and regional
coordination and information exchange.
Key Actors
International, national and local disaster management agencies; national meteorological and
hydrological services; military and civil authorities; media organizations (print, television, radio and on-
line); businesses in vulnerable sectors (e.g. tourism, aged care facilities, marine vessels); community-
based and grassroots organizations; international and UN agencies such as UN/ISDR, IFRC, UNDP,
UNESCO, UNEP, WMO, OCHA.
Checklist
1. Organizational and Decision-making
Processes Institutionalised
Warning dissemination chain enforced
through government policy or legislation (e.g.
message passed from government to
emergency managers and communities etc).
Recognized authorities empowered to
disseminate warning messages (e.g.
meteorological authorities to provide weather
messages, health authorities to provide
health warnings).
Functions, roles and responsibilities of each
actor in the warning dissemination process
specified in legislation or government policy
(e.g. national meteorological and hydrological
services, media, NGOs).
Roles and responsibilities of regional or cross
border early warning centres defined,
including the dissemination of warnings to
neighbouring countries.
Volunteer network trained and empowered to
receive and widely disseminate hazard
warnings to remote households and
communities.
2. Effective Communication Systems and
Equipment Installed
Communication and dissemination systems
tailored to the needs of individual
communities (e.g. radio or television for those
with access; and sirens, warning flags or
messenger runners for remote communities).
Warning communication technology reaches
the entire population, including seasonal
populations and remote locations.
International organizations or experts
consulted to assist with identification and
procurement of appropriate equipment.
Multiple communication mediums used for
warning dissemination (e.g. mass media and
informal communication).
Agreements developed to utilise private
sector resources where appropriate (e.g.
amateur radios, safety shelters).
Consistent warning dissemination and
communication systems used for all hazards.
Communication system is two-way and
interactive to allow for verification that
warnings have been received.
Equipment maintenance and upgrade
programme implemented and redundancies
enforced so back-up systems are in place in
the event of a failure.
3. Warning Messages Recognised and
Understood
Warning alerts and messages tailored to the
specific needs of those at risk (e.g. for diverse
cultural, social, gender, linguistic and
educational backgrounds).
Warning alerts and messages are
geographically-specific to ensure warnings
are targeted to those at risk only.
Messages incorporate the understanding of
the values, concerns and interests of those
who will need to take action (e.g. instructions
for safeguarding livestock and pets).
Warning alerts clearly recognisable and
consistent over time and include follow-up
actions when required.
Warnings specific about the nature of the
threat and its impacts.
Mechanisms in place to inform the community
when the threat has ended.
Study into how people access and interpret
early warning messages undertaken and
lessons learnt incorporated into message
formats and dissemination processes.
8
Key Element 4: RESPONSE CAPABILITY
Aim: Strengthen the ability of communities to respond to natural disasters through enhanced
education of natural hazard risks, community participation and disaster preparedness.
Key Actors
Community-based and grassroots organizations; schools; universities; informal education sector;
media (print, radio, television, on-line); technical agencies with specialised knowledge of hazards;
international; national and local disaster management agencies; regional disaster management
agencies; international and UN agencies such as OCHA, UNDP, UNEP, FAO, UNESCO, UN/ISDR,
IFRC, WMO.
Checklist
1. Warnings Respected
Warnings generated and distributed to those
at risk by credible sources (e.g. government,
spiritual leaders, respected community
organizations).
Public perception of natural hazard risks and
the warning service analysed to predict
community responses.
Strategies to build credibility and trust in
warnings developed (e.g. understanding
difference between forecasts and warnings).
False alarms minimised and improvements
communicated to maintain trust in the
warning system.
2. Disaster Preparedness and Response
Plans Established
Disaster preparedness and response plans
empowered by law.
Disaster preparedness and response plans
targeted to the individual needs of vulnerable
communities.
Hazard and vulnerability maps utilized to
develop emergency preparedness and
response plans.
Up-to-date emergency preparedness and
response plans developed, disseminated to
the community, and practiced.
Previous disaster events and responses
analysed, and lessons learnt incorporated
into disaster management plans.
Strategies implemented to maintain
preparedness for recurrent hazard events.
Regular tests and drills undertaken to test the
effectiveness of the early warning
dissemination processes and responses.
3. Community Response Capacity Assessed
and Strengthened
Community ability to respond effectively to
early warnings assessed.
Response to previous disasters analysed and
lessons learnt incorporated into future
capacity building strategies.
Community-focused organizations engaged
to assist with capacity building.
Community and volunteer education and
training programmes developed and
implemented.
4. Public Awareness and Education
Enhanced
Simple information on hazards,
vulnerabilities, risks, and how to reduce
disaster impacts disseminated to vulnerable
communities and decision-makers.
Community educated on how warnings will be
disseminated and which sources are reliable
and how to respond to different types of
hazards after an early warning message is
received.
Community trained to recognise simple
hydro-meteorological and geophysical hazard
signals to allow immediate response.
On-going public awareness and education
built in to school curricula from primary
schools to university.
Mass media and folk or alternative media
utilized to improve public awareness.
Public awareness and education campaigns
tailored to the specific need of each audience
(e.g. children, emergency managers, media).
Public awareness strategies and programmes
evaluated at least once per year and updated
where required.
9
Cross-Cutting Issue: GOVERNANCE AND INSTITUTIONAL
ARRANGEMENTS
Aim: Develop institutional, legislative and policy frameworks that support the implementation and
maintenance of effective early warning systems.
Key Actors
Political leaders; policy makers (e.g. environment, development and planning departments);
international, national and local disaster management agencies; meteorological and hydrological
organizations; researchers and academics; non-government organizations; international and UN
agencies such as UNDP, UNEP, FAO, UNESCO, UN/ISDR, WMO, World Bank and regional
development banks, IFRC.
Checklist
1. Early Warning Secured as a Long Term
National and Local Priority
Economic benefits of early warning
highlighted to senior government and political
leaders using practical methods such as a
cost-benefit analysis of previous disasters.
Examples and case studies of successful
early warning systems disseminated to senior
government and political leaders.
Early warning role models or champions
engaged to advocate early warning and
promote its benefits.
The priority natural hazard risk requiring an
early warning system identified, and
operational arrangements within a multi-
hazard framework established.
Early warning integrated into national
economic planning.
2. Legal and Policy Frameworks to Support
Early Warning Established
National legislation or policies developed to
provide an institutional and legal basis for
implementing early warning systems.
Clear roles and responsibilities defined for all
organizations (government and non-
government) involved in early warning.
Overall responsibility and authority for
coordination of early warning assigned to one
national agency.
One political leader or senior government
official empowered by law as the national
decision maker.
Policies developed to decentralise disaster
management and encourage community
participation.
Local decision making and implementation of
early warning systems placed within broader
administrative and resource capabilities at the
national or regional level.
Regional and cross-border agreements
established to ensure early warning systems
are integrated where possible.
Relationships and partnerships between all
organizations involved in early warning
institutionalised and coordination
mechanisms mandated.
Early warning integrated into disaster
reduction and development policies.
Monitoring and enforcement regime in place
to support policies and legislation.
3. Institutional Capacities Assessed and
Enhanced
Capacities of all organizations and institutions
involved assessed and capacity building
plans and training programmes developed
and resourced.
Non-governmental sector engaged and
encouraged to contribute to capacity building.
4. Financial Resources Secured
Government funding mechanism for early
warning and disaster preparedness
developed and institutionalised.
Access to funding at the international or
regional level explored.
Public/private partnerships utilised to assist
with early warning system development.
10
ACRONYMS LIST
EWC III Third International Conference on Early Warning
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization
IFRC International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
ITU International Telecommunication Union
NGO Non-Governmental Organization
OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat
UN United Nations
UNDP United Nations Development Programme
UNEP United Nations Environment Programme
UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
UN/ISDR United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction
UNOSAT United Nations initiative to provide the humanitarian community with access to satellite
imagery and Geographic Information System services
UNU-EHS United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security
PPEW Platform for Promotion of Early Warning
WMO World Meteorological Organization
UN/ISDR Platform for the Promotion
of Early Warning (PPEW)
Herrmann-Ehlers-Strasse 10
D - 53113 Bonn
Germany
[email protected]
www.unisdr-earlywarning.org
UN Inter-Agency Secretariat of the International
Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR)
Palais des Nations
CH - 1211 Geneva 10
Switzerland
[email protected]
www.unisdr.org
This document is an outcome of the Third
International Conference on Early Warning
(EWC III) hosted by the Government of
Germany under the auspices of the United
Nations, from 27 to 29 March 2006 in Bonn,
Germany.
Contact Information
ewcIII_CL_cover_rz_druck.indd 2 23.05.2006, 11:08:32