Seniores-Iuniores in The Late-Roman Field Army

Seniores-Iuniores in the Late-Roman Field Army
Author(s): Roger Tomlin

Reviewed work(s):
Source: The American Journal of Philology, Vol. 93, No. 2 (Apr., 1972), pp. 253-278
Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/293251 .
Accessed: 25/11/2012 13:16
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The
American Journal of Philology.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.52.75 on Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:16:10 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
AMERICAN
JOURNAL
OF PHILOLOGY
VOL.
XCIII,
2 WHOLE
NO.
370
SENIORES-IUNIORES IN THE LATE-ROMAN
F IELD ARMY.1
. .
partiti
sunt comites ... militares
partiti
sunt numeri
. . diviso
palatio
ut
potiori placuerat,
Valentinianus Medio-
lanum,
Constantinopolim
Valens discessit.
In these
words,
Ammianus Marcellinus describes the division
of
generals, regiments,
and civil
administration,
between the
brothers Valentinian and Valens in June 364.2
Henceforth,
east and west had an
army
and
Augustus
of its own: no new
arrangement,
but now made
permanent.3
In
364,
Ammianus
1Expanded
from a
paper
read in San
F rancisco,
on December 28th
1969,
to the American
Philological
Association. I was then a
visiting
assistant
professor
at Cornell
University,
and would thank
my pupils
and
colleagues
for their
hospitality.
I also thank Professor
Birley
and
his
colleagues
at Durham
University,
who
kindly
read the final draft.
See NOTE at end of this
article, p.
278.
Ammianus is cited from the edition of C. U. Clark
(1910
and
1915,
reprinted 1963),
and the Notitia from that of
O.
Seeck
(1876, reprinted
1962). Regiments
named
by
Ammianus
(with references)
will be found
in
Appendix
i. Those named
by
the Notitia will be found in Seeck's
excellent
indices,
where I have noted
only
two
errors,
in the reference
to comites
sagittarii
iuniores
(p. 319)
and to the Antianenses
(p.
320).
2Amm., XXVI, 5,
1-4. The
army
was divided at
Mediana,
a suburb
of Naissus
(Nish, Yugoslavia),
where Valentinian
spent
most of June
364
(C. Th., I, 6, 2, etc.).
8
Cf. E.
Kornemann, Doppelprinzipat
und
Reichsteilung
im
Imperium
Romanum
(1930), especially pp.
140-1;
and note 21 below. Valentinianic
propaganda
stresses
imperial unity, by
shared
coin-types
and
legends
(CONCORDIA
is
conspicuous by
its
absence),
and in
panegyric:
Themistius, 76AB; Symmachus, Or., 1,
13.
253
ROGER TOMLIN.
had
probably just
left the
army
in which he had served over
ten
years,
in the
east,
in
Gaul,
and on the Persian
expedition.
In
retirement,
whether he was
travelling
or
living
in Antioch
and
Rome,
he must have added
many eye-witness
accounts to
his own
experiences.
In his
lifetime,
he witnessed the
struggle
to maintain Roman frontiers
against
almost continual attack.
He recorded the
great
achievements of Constantius
II, Julian,
and
Valentinian;
Julian's foolish invasion of
Persia;
and the
crowning
disaster of
Adrianople (378)
with which his
History
ends. Part was
published by 392,
and the whole
by
ca. 395
(the
exact date is
unknown).4
When Theodosius died in
395,
the
Empire
was divided between his two sons. The eastern frontier
was secured
by
an
agreement
with
Persia,
but the Danube had
been lost for
ever,
the Rhine was held almost
by courtesy
of
F ranks and
Alamanni,
and Roman
authority
was
receding
from
Britain. The Goths could roam the Balkans at
will,
brigandage
and
heresy
were
endemic,
and a disaffected
peasantry
was
ready
to
rebel,
or at least to collaborate with invaders. The
Empire's
precarious stability largely depended
on the
army,
whose limi-
tanei would not
usually go
far from their fortified bases
along
the frontiers and lines of
communication,
but whose "field
armies"
(regiments palatini
and
comitatenses)
were concen-
trated
strategically ready
to move fast and far in
emergency.
The latter
regiments
are the
subject
of this
paper,
for
only they
carry (sometimes)
the
supplementary
title of seniores or iu-
niores.5 Ammianus names over
thirty,
but is
explicitly
aware of
'
A terminus ante
quem
of 396 is " conceded"
by
R.
Syme,
Ammianus
and the Historia Augusta
(1968),
p. 18,
in a critical review of 0. J.
Maenchen-Helfen,
A.
J.P.,
LXXVI
(1955), pp.
384-99. A
slightly
earlier date is not
proven.
6
The
only
4th
century exceptions
are the obsolete milites iuniores
Italici
(note
38
below),
and the three
equites
Stablesiani in Raetia.
Now the Raetia
chapter
(Oco. 35)
is
unique
among
the Danubian
ducates in
showing
"Stiliconian" revision: its senior officials are
drawn from the offices of the
magistri
militum
praesentales.
Also it lacks
the
many
cunei
equitum
and auxilia of the other
ducates,
the Stablesiani
being
the
only cavalry
unit of
post-ala type. They
were
probably
drafted
in from the field
armies,
to
remedy
the frontier's weakness in
cavalry
(Amm., XVIII, 8,
2 for a
Mlesopotamian instance):
a
practice
well-
attested in the 5th
century East,
C.
J., XII, 35,
18
(492) and, earlier,
Synesius, Ep. 78,
but how far it was followed in the West is uncertain
(see
E.
Stein, BRGK.,
XVIII
[1928], pp.
92
ff.).
This
may
have
hap-
254
" SENIORES-IUNIORES."
this distinction
only
once. He is almost
unique among
fourth
century
writers in
actually naming regiments.
As a retired
officer,
he
may
have
respected
their
esprit
de
corps.
He
does,
however,
have a
literary-minded
historian's distaste for "un-
classical"
military terminology.6
miles
quondam
et
Graecus.
The Notitia
Dignitatum,
as a
catalogue
of
high
offices in east
and
west, incidentally
names with full title the
regiments
of
the various field armies. It was
probably compiled
soon after
395.7 The eastern lists show no
sign
of later
revision,
but the
western have been
kept
"
up
to date
"
until ca. 420.
Both,
how-
ever, incorporate
obsolete
material, including
the titles of
long-
dead
regiments.8
Western
regiments
are listed twice: first as
pened
late in the 4th
century:
the
strategic
road-centre of Pons
Aeni,
from which the
equites
Stablesiani
itniores
have been
posted,
had
already
had two
previous garrisons
in the 4th
century-a cavalry
regiment
in
310,
comitatenses as it
happens
(.I. L., III, 5565),
and
the Pontinenses
(or
Pontennenses),
now
pseudocomitatenses
in
Italy.
e
Averil and Alan
Cameron,
0.
Q.,
n. s. XIV
(1964), p.
326. Ammianus'
inexact
terminology
is
exhaustively surveyed by
A.
Miiller, Philologus,
n. s. XVIII
(1905),
pp.
574 ff. Even in
regiment-titles
he is not
always
explicit:
neither he
(XXIV, 1, 2)
nor Zosimus
(III, 14, 1) specifies
the
1500
troops screening
the Roman
army's
advance down the
Euphrates,
which were in fact drawn from the Lanciarii and
Mattiarii
(Malalas,
ed.
Dindorf,
p. 330,
2
ff.). Libanius, however,
can relate Julian's mili-
tary
career without
naming
a
single regiment (Or. 18),
and Julian
himself names
only
the
pair
which made him
Emperor (283B).
7A. H. M.
Jones,
The Later Roman
Empire (1964), III,
pp.
347 ff.
I owe much to his note
(pp. 356-7)
on the division of the comitatus
in 365
(sic).
8
The
regiments per
lineam valli
surveyed by
S.
F rere,
Britannia
(1967),
pp. 230ff.,
need not be the
only "ghosts."
Other
chapters
actually
contain
newly-added regiments
side
by
side with dead ones.
Thus the
army
of the comes
Africae (Occ. 7,
140
ff., 179ff.),
while con-
taining
Honoriani, also contains two
regiments destroyed
in
373,
the
equites
iv
sagittarii
and the Constantiaci. The
duz
Mesopotamiae
(Or.
36),
whose
chapter
contains a "Theodosian" item
(ibid., 20),
is credited with the
legiones
I and II
Parthica, destroyed
in 359. Yet
V
Parthica,
another
casualty
of that
year,
has been deleted. The rubric
item
pseudocomitatenses (Or. 7, 48)
is the earliest instance of this
title
(pace
A. H. M.
Jones,
L. B.
., II, p. 609),
for the
legio
II
Armeniaca
(ibid., 50)
had been lost in
359,
while its
companion
I
Armeniaca
(ibid., 49)
survived 363
(Mlalas,
p.
332, 9). Legio
I
Isaura
sagittaria was not added before 354
(Amm., XIV, 2,
14 with
Or.
29, 7-8),
nor the balistarii Theodosiaci before 379.
255
ROGER TOMLIN.
infantry
or
cavalry
under the
appropriate magister
at Court
(Occ.
5 and
6);
and second
(Occ. 7), again
as
infantry
or
cavalry,
under the
appropriate
field
army commander,
in
Italy,
western
Illyricum, Gaul, Spain, Tingitania, Africa,
and Britain.
The two lists were
kept up independently,
and so serve as some
check on each
other; they
also show
discrepancies,
sometimes
only
in the
wording
of a
title,
but more often because of cross-
postings
and insertion of new
regiments.9
The eastern order
of battle is less centralised. Two armies
(Or.
5 and
6),
both
of
infantry
and
cavalry,
are attached to the
Court, recently
drawn from
separate
armies of
infantry
and
cavalry
like the
western.'0
The other
regiments
are divided
among
three field
armies, per
Orientem
(Or. 7),
in Thrace
(Or. 8),
and in eastern
Illyricum (Or. 9).
Each
regiment
is named
only
once.
Independent
record survives of two armies concentrated in
north
Italy
at the end of the fourth
century.
The
poet
Claudian
ingeniously
names seven
regiments
which
campaigned against
Gildo in 398.11 Like
Ammianus,
he eschews the
unpoetical
detail of whether
they
were seniores or
iuniores,
but all seven
may
be identified in the Notitia.
Only four, however,
are cer-
tainly
in north
Italy;
a fifth is in
Gaul,
and the other two in
Spain.
Yet two of this trio were once in north
Italy,
for
they
occur
among
the
regiments
known at Concordia
(just
west of
Aquileia).
The
epitapl-
of its
early
Christian
cemetery
include
a remarkable
group
of
3S,
which name between them 22
regi-
Tabulated in A. H. M.
Jones,
L. R.
E., III, p.
361.
10
As late as
388,
Theodosius still followed Valens in
having
a
magis-
ter
peditum praesentalis
and a
magister equitum praesentalis (Zos.,
IV, 45, 2;
cf. C.
Th., IV, 17,
5
[386]),
but
by
391 had
adopted
the
system
of two
magistri
militum
praesentales (C. Th., VII, 1, 13;
cf.
Zos., IV, 27).
See
Mommsen,
Ges.
Schriften, IV,
pp.
550-1.
If the lists of the two eastern
praesental
armies are laid side
by side,
it is at once obvious that
many "pairings"
have been
broken,
which
we know once
existed,
either from
Ammianus,
or
by analogy
with the
western lists:
e.g.
the
equites
Promoti seniores (Or.
5, 28)
with the
Comites seniores
(Or.
6, 28),
cf.
Amm., XV, 4,
10 and Occ.
6, 43-4-
7,
159-60.
"1
Bellum
Gildonicum, I, 415-23. The
regiments
named
(with their
probable identification)
are the Ioviani and Herculiani
(seniores,
Italy);
Nervii
(sagittarii Nervii,
Spain/Concordia);
F elices
(seniores, Italy);
legio Augusta (VIII Augusta,
i.e.
Octavani, Italy);
Invicti
(seniores,
Spain) ;
Leones
(either iuniores, Italy;
or
seniores,
Gaul/Concordia).
256
"
SENIORES-I UNIORES."
ments,
almost all of field
army
rank. These
may represent an
army
cantoned there
by
Theodosius in winter
394/5, or
perhaps
a
longer
accumulation from units active in northeastern
Italy,
from the 380's into the
early
fifth
century.l2
Other evidence is
slight,
but valuable in confirmation. A few
inscriptions survive, mostly
scattered
epitaphs
of
comitatenses,
brief,
and
generally
undatable. The crack
regiment
of the
loviani is best
represented,
with
corpses
at
Trier, Arles, Milan,
Aquileia (a
man from
Sirmium),
Concordia,
and Antioch."3
Late-Roman
regiment-titles
show a certain
pleasing imagina-
tion,
but it is limited.
Many express military
function or arma-
ment
(balistarii,
clibanarii,
catafractarii),
trailing
off into the
ornamental
(insidiatores,
propugnatores)
and
optimistic (vic-
tores, invicti).
Ethnic titles are common as in the
Principate,
deriving
from the
original
source of recruitment
(Atecotti,
Eruli, Brisigavi).
Others recall a
frontier-station,
whether the
regiment
there has been
promoted
to the field
army (Segun-
tienses, Acincenses)
or
provides
a detachment named
by
the
parent-legion's
nickname
(Divitenses, Moesiaci).l4
Other le-
gionary
detachments
keep
their
parent's
number
(Septimani,
Octavani). Regiments
can
only
be dated if named after an em-
peror (presumably
on
recruitment, though
sometimes
perhaps
to honour an
existing unit)
: the famous Ioviani and Herculiani
were named
by
Diocletian and Maximian after their
tutelary
gods,'5
and the lists are full of
Constantiniani,
Valentinianenses,
Theodosiani, Honoriani, etc.
Regiments
often bear titles formed
by combining
elements:
sagittarii Nervii, comites
Arcadiaci, etc.
When the suffix seniores or iuniores
occurs, it
always supple-
ments the
title, coming
last
word,
as in Ascarii Honoriani
la
Published
accurately
for the first time, with
ample commentary,
by
D.
Hoffmann, Museum
Helveticum, XX
(1963),
pp.
22-57. His date
of
394/5
is
open
to doubt
(Appendix ii).
"'Appendix
iii.
14 E.
g. Seguntienses, C. E.
Stevens, Arch.
Journal, XCVII
(1940),
p.
134.
Divitenses, I.L.
S., 2346 and 2777.
15
Zos., III, 30, 2; cf.
Sozomen, VI, 6, 4 (ed.
Bidez,
p.
244, 4).
Vegetius says (I, 17), however, that
they
were
originally two
legions
of Mattiobarbuli in
Illyricum, honoured
by
Diocletian and Maximian.
Earlier
legions certainly gained dynastic titles
during their
career,
usually
for
loyalty
in time of
rebellion, and so a 4th
century dynastic
title is not
necessarily
sure criterion of date of recruitment.
2!57
ROGER TOMLIN.
seniores. A few
regiments, mostly iuniores,
have
gained
an extra
geographical suffix, evidently
from service within the
region
named,
like the Victores iuniores Britanniciani in Britain.16
The seniores-iuniores suffix
distinguishes
two
regiments
that
would otherwise have been
homonyms,
as is obvious from the
Notitia indices. At
Concordia,
27
sarcophagi
name
regiments
we know from the Notitia to have had
homonyms,
and in 20
cases a suffix is
duly
added. It is added without
exception
in
the seven
epitaphs
of men from the Batavi
seniores; and, signifi-
cantly,
in those of two men from the Mattiaci seniores and two
veterans of the Mattiaci iuniores. Ammianus uses the suffix
only
once, however,
to
speak
of the Divitenses
Tungrecanosque
iu-
niores who
proclaimed Procopius.
At their second
appearance,
the Divitenses are
unqualified.17
At this
very
time,
a
"brigade
"
of
Divitenses-Tungrecani
was
operating
in
Gaul,
and it is
only
from the Notitia that we can deduce
they
were the seniores.
Other
pairs
of
homonyms
lurk in Ammianus' narrative. The
distinction seems
official,
for it is observed in the "
Army
List"
and in a
cemetery
where soldiers buried their
comrades,
but
ignored by literary-minded people
like Ammianus and Claudian.
Even the Notitia shows a late-Roman
tendency
to abbreviate
regiment-titles
(as
in the
illustration-captions), and,
where
homonyms
served in different
armies,
the distinction would be
unnecessary
in
day
to
day usage.
The Notitia's
homonyms
tend to fall into seniores-iuniores
pairs,
rather more than
fifty
basic titles
being
so
distinguished,
but the
pattern
is hard to follow. Some seniores or iuniores have
lost their
complement,
no doubt because it has been
destroyed.
This is
clearly
true of the lone
Divitenses-Tungrecani seniores,
whose
missing
iuniores must have been disbanded
by
Valens for
treason. Sometimes there are two seniores or two iuniores
(or
both),
but never such that there is a
pair
of exact
homonyms,
suffix and
all,
of
equal
rank within the same half of the
Empire.l1
16
Appendix
iv.
17
Ammianus' characteristic omission of iuniores
(XXVI, 7, 14)
led
Clark to insert a comma between Divitenses and
Tungrecanosque XXVI,
6, 12).
The Notitia
(cf.
Appendix v)
confirms that this was a
pair
of
iuniores.
18
Apparent exceptions
are due to
duplication
of
regiments
in Occ., 7
because of
cross-postings (n.
9
above),
or due to
slight
variations in
title between Occ.
5/6
and 7.
258
"
SENIORES-IUNIORES."
It cannot be coincidence that
homonyms
fall
mostly
into
pairs
of
regiments
of
equal
rank.l1
This is
surely
because each
derived
from a
unique regiment
that
pre-existed
them.
Appendix
v
summarises the careers of five
brigades
known from
Ammianus,
despite
his
confusing
habit of
speaking
of a
regiment always
as if it were the
only
one of the name. All ten
regiments,
we
know from the
Notitia,
were divided into seniores and
iuniores.
We know from Ammianus that the
Ioviani-Herculiani,
the
Celtae-Petulantes,
and
probably
the
Iovii-Victores,
were not
divided before
364;
the Eruli-Batavi not before 361
(if
not
363).
The
and Eruli-Batavi were
divided
by 365;
and the Iovii-Victores
by
367. The scolae of
the Gentiles and Scutarii had
already
been divided
by
Constan-
tius II with his
junior colleagues,
but not
necessarily by
seniores--iuniores division. A third scola and seven other
regi-
ments so divided in the Notitia are named
by Ammianus,
but
without
adequate
evidence of division.
The Notitia offers
only
a confused
picture
of how
regiments
were divided
geographically,20
for it is a rather later
document,
when "twins" have been
destroyed,
and
regiments
transferred
to new
groupings.
At least 11 have been divided between east
and
west,
9
(and
probably all) securely pre-364
in
origin.
Well
over 20 have been divided within the
west,
rather fewer in the
east, precise
totals
being impossible.
Of these
latter,
12 are
securely post-364.
This is corroborative evidence of the date of
division.
The division of
regiments might
be
expected
to coincide with
the definitive division of the
army
between east and west in 364.
This date fits the evidence of Ammianus
very
well. Crack
regi-
ments like the loviani are divided with seniores in the
west,
iuniores in the
east;
the reverse is almost unknown. This
surely
reflects the division of the
Empire
between
Valentinian,
the
19
The loviani and Herculiani and several scolae have
closely
similar
shields in Or. and
Oco.,
but this is unusual. The Promoti are
unique
in
being
divided into two
palatine
seniores and two comitatensian
iuniores. A few
legions
like II Augusta and VII Gemina have furnished
detachments of both comitatensis and
pseudocomitatensis
rank,
the
difference
being
due to the date at which
they
were drafted from the
frontier.
2s
Appendix
vi.
259
ROGER TOMLIN.
senior
Augustus
of the
west,
and his
junior colleague
in the
east.21 The first iuniores
appear
at
Procopius' proclamation
in
September
365
(there
is no earlier instance of
seniores-iuniores),
and three
inscriptions
earlier than the Notitia confirm that the
suffix was soon current. F lavius
Nuvel,
a retired commander
of the
equites Armigeri iuniores, filius
Saturnini viri
perfectis-
simi ex
comitibus,
dedicated a basilica at
Rusgunia (near
Algiers).
The
place,
and his
hereditary rank,
would fit the
petty
king Nubel,
who died
shortly
before 372. The
family
was
pro-
Roman when it suited them: Nubel's sons included the
fiercely
pro-Roman Zammac,
the
usurper
F irmus and his
ally
Mascezel,
the rebel Gildo and
(again)
his
enemy
Mascezel.22 At some
date between 370 and
375,
a
regiment
of seniores
(probably
Balistarii)
left record of its activities in the Crimea.23 Not
long
after Valentinian's death
(375),
to
judge by
associated
coins,
a soldier of the Mattiaci seniores was buried at Bordeaux.24
Negative
evidence is
provided by
a tombstone from near An-
tioch of a soldier of the Ioviani with an
Illyrian
name. Its date
is
364/5,
and the loviani
carry
no suffix. The man
may
well
have been
discharged
when Jovian
struggled
back to Antioch
in
summer, 363,
and have died soon after.25 It is unfortunate
21
Ammianus'
summary description
of Valens as
participem quidem
legitimum potestatis,
sed in modum
apparitoris morigerum (XXVI,
4, 3)
is
largely
correct. The
untheological
Ausonius
compares
Valen-
tinian with the F ather of the
Trinity,
omnia solus
habens, atque
omnia
dilargitus (Versus Paschales, 28),
cf. note 3 above.
22 .
I.L., VIII, 9255; Amm., XXIX, 5,
2 Nubel velut
regulus per
nationes Mauricas
potentissimus.
His son Zammac
(or Salmaces)
owned an estate at Petra
(XXIX, 5,
2 and
13),
the other side of the
Grande
Kabylie
about 100 miles to the
east,
where a metrical
inscrip-
tion
proclaimed
his
loyalty
to Rome
(I.
L.
S., 9351). Claudian,
B.
Gild.,
I,
389 ff. and
Zos., V,
11
(Mascezel).
F irmus was
powerfully
aided
by
his sister
Cyria (Amm., XXIX, 5, 28);
it was she, or
perhaps
another
of Nubel's
daughters,
that ended her
days
in the odour of
sanctity
in
Constantinople,
with her niece
Salvina,
Gildo's
daughter
and widow
of Theodosius'
nephew
Nebridius
(Jerome, Epp.
79 and
123, 17;
Palladius, Dialogus
de vita S. lohannis
Chrysostomi,
ed. P.R. Coleman-
Norton,
p.
61).
23
A. E.,
1908,
178.
24
I.
L.S., 9215,
first
published
in R. .
A.,
XII
(1910), pp.
67-72.
Two coins are of
Valens,
one of
Valentinian,
two
"Valentinianic,"
and
one
apparently
of Valentinian II.
Style
and
lettering
suit a late 4th
century
date.
26
A. E., 1940, 214.
260
"
SENIORES-IUNIORES."
that F lavius Memorius'
epitaph
at Arles 26 is not dated:
this
distinguished
officer served inter lovianos 28
years,
6 as
pro-
tector,
and 3 as commander of the Lanciarii
seniores, before
becoming
a
general.
The division of
regiments clearly
fell
during
those
years
as
protector.
The
date,
let us
say,
was 364. How were the
regiments
divided? The
question
has been
ignored.21
seniores and
iuniores
cannot be
perfunctorily
divided into
regiments
of " old
soldiers
"
and of
"recruits,"
28 for the
history
of some stretches from
the
third
century (undivided)
into the fifth at least. The men
of
the Mattiaci iuniores buried at Concordia were
veterans,
while
the men of the Batavi seniores were all
ages
from 25 to
60.
A retired tribune of the loviani seniores had served 40
years
in the
regiment,
no doubt from recruitment.29 Soldiers'
ages
have
nothing
to do with
regimental titles,
even if seniores
enjoy
the
primacy traditionally
accorded the old. Thus the first fifteen
regiments
of the elite
army
of
Italy
are all
seniores,
which
elsewhere rank above their
iuniores,
should
they
occur in the
same list. The association of seniores with the senior
Augustus
has
already
been noted. In
fighting quality, however,
no dif-
26
. L.
S., 2788. Memorius retired as comes
Tingitaniae
with the
rank
only
of vir
perfectissimus.
F rom
372,
comites rei militaris ranked
with
proconsulares (C.
Th., VI, 14, 1),
but as late as
398,
frontier
comites
(except per Africam)
and duces were still clarissimi
(C. Th.,
I, 7, 3).
Despite Amm.,
XXI, 16, 2,
the dux Valeriae at least was
still
perfectissimus
in
365/7 (I.L.S., 762)
and as late as 372
(brick-
stamps
from the
Visegrad burgus,
S.
Soproni,
in Studien zu den Militdr-
grenzen
Roms
[KEln, 1967],
pp. 138-43);
so the
change
in status seems
to have been
gradual (the
dux
Scythiae
being
clarissimus in
369,
I. L.
S., 770).
The comes
Tingitaniae
may
not have attained the claris-
simate until
372,
which would
place
Memorius' command of the Lan-
ciarii seniores in 364-367. Earlier than
this, they
seem to have been
undivided
(Appendix v).
Memorius'
career,
it must be
admitted,
if
his
retirement-rank has been
correctly stated,
is hard to reconcile with
all the other
evidence of seniores and iuniores.
27
By
R.
Grosse,
R6mische
Militdrgeschichte (1920),
and even in
A. H. M.
Jones, L.R.E.,
ch. xvii.
Pauly-Wissowa
and the standard
dictionaries are aware of the
distinction,
but do not
explain
it.
28
" Au
Bas-Empire,
la distinction entre seniores et
iuniores,
entre
anciens et
conscrits,
est
eourante,"
J.
Carcopino, Syria,
VI
(1925),
p.
131
(citing regiment-titles).
The
only explanation
known to me.
29
1
L.
S.,
2789.
261
ROGER TOMLIN.
ference is
apparent:
Valens reinforced the crucial Danube
frontier with a
pair
of iuniores
(who nearly
made
Procopius
emperor),
while two
pairs
of seniores were
being
humiliated
by
the Alamanni in Gaul.30
seniores-iuniores first
distinguishes regiments only
in
364,
but elsewhere the distinction is
common, usually
with
military
overtones. Servius Tullus
traditionally
divided the
people
into
iuniores, men
aged
between 17 and 46 fit for
military service,
and seniores.31 Thus the
Republican equivalent
of draft files
were the iuniorum
tabulae,
and the
emperor
Tiberius could
describe himself as iam senior when too old for
soldiering.32
Rather more
precisely,
iuniores is used to mean "recruits" in
the
Principate,
and
commonly
in the Theodosian Code and
Vegetius.
The
anonymous
author of a
pamphlet
submitted to
Valentinian and Valens uses it to describe the 50 or 100
young
men who will be attached to a
regiment,
to fill vacancies as
they
occur.33 This is not so far removed from the sense of iuvenes in
Italian towns of the
early Empire, young
men
undergoing pre-
military training.
In
245,
the iuniores vici of
Bitburg (near
Trier) actually
build some sort of tower.34 In the fourth
century,
at
least,
senior and iunior are used also in a
non-military
sense
which
might, however, suggest
a
possible relationship
between
two
regiments:
father and son. Besides
appearing
on tomb-
stones,
the
usage
is found on coins and in the Theodosian Code
to
distinguish
Valentinian II from Valentinian I his
father;
in
Claudian,
to
distinguish
Count Theodosius from his son the
Emperor.35
80 The
and Eruli-Batavi
(Appendix
v).
8
Cicero,
De
Republica, II,
39
(22);
Livy, I, 43, 1,
cf.
Censorinus,
De Die
Natali, 14,
2
(citing
Varro).
82
Livy, XXIV, 18,
7
(who
often uses iuniores in the sense of "men
of
military age"); Tacitus, Ann., III, 47,
4.
8
C. I.
L., VIII,
7036
(Hadrianic); VI,
31747
(3rd century). Twenty
instances in 0.
Gradenwitz, Heidelberger
Index zum Theodosianus
(1925);
in 0.
Th., VII, 13,
6 as a
synonym
for tirones.
Symmachus,
Ep., VI,
58. In
Vegetius
(ed. C.
Lang, 1885) nearly always
of recruits
undergoing
basic
training,
but
p. 37,
3 is a
parallel
to De Rebus
Bellicis,
V,
5
(E.
A.
Thompson,
A Roman
Reformer
and Inventor
[1952], p.
97).
84
R.
MacMullen,
Soldier and Civilian in the Later Roman
Empire
(1963), pp. 135-7, especially
n. 52 and n. 59.
C.I.L., XIII,
4131.
86 I. L. C.
V.,
1506a
(a
Dassianus senior for his son Dassianus
iunior).
262
"
SENIORES--IUNIORES."
iuniores alone is
occasionally
used of
regiments
in the
early
third
century
in
Africa, apparently
to show that
they
were
drafted from a
parent-body.
A numerus Emesenorum
iuniorum
and the Osdroeni iuniores are attested from the Severan frontier
of Mauretania
by fragmentary inscriptions:
it is
plausible
that
they
are drafts from the well-known cohors milliaria
Hemese-
norum of Intercisa
(now Dunaujvaros, Hungary)
and its com-
panion
numerus
Osroenorum,
sent to north Africa for
training
in a
congenial
climate.86 Also in the
early
third
century,
a
tribune of the Urban Cohorts was transferred to the command
of the
equites itemque pedites
iuniores Mauri with ius
gladii.37
Obviously
a
responsible post,
his
duty being perhaps
to reduce
a
large
draft of Mauri to Roman
discipline.
The Notitia
offers
only
one
example
of this
type
of
title,
iuniores
preceding
an
ethnic element: the milites iuniores Italici at
Ravenna,
a limi-
tanean
title,
and an obsolete item.
(Ravenna
had been the im-
perial headquarters
since about
402.38) They
are not a forma-
tion like the
eight palatine
iuniores Gallicani or iuniores Britan-
niciani in the western field armies, most of which exist inde-
pendently
of the well-attested seniores-iuniores
pairs
of the
same
title,
and are
plausibly
detachments once drawn from the
parent-unit
during
a term of service in the
region
named. Con-
versely,
some
regiments
of iuniores have
gained
the suffix
by
being
drafted to the field armies from a frontier
unit,
like the
Secundani iuniores in Britain from the old
Legio
II
Augusta.9
Valentinianus
iunior,
cos. 376:
O. Th., VI, 4, 24; I.L.S.,
4152 and
4268. J. W. E.
Pearce, The Roman
Imperial Coinage,
IX
(1951), p.
319.
Valentinianus senior
(posthumously):
C.
Th., VII, 4, 22; X, 5, 1;
XV, 1,
33.
(Theodosius)
senior, Claudian,
B.
Gild., I,
224.
36 As
suggested by
J.
Carcopino,
Syria, VI
(1925), pp.
129-34
(cf.
note 28
above),
publishing
an
inscription
with the
conjectural
restora-
tion numerus Emesenorum
iuniorum,
and
restoring
C. I.
L., VIII,
9829.
Intercisa,
I. L.
S.,
2540.
7
I. L.
S., 1356,
the career of T. Licinius
Hierocles, praeses
Maure-
taniae Caesariensis
(in
227,
C. I.
L., VIII, 9334).
88
Ionorius'
constitutions are
regularly
from Ravenna after December
402
(C. Th., VII, 13, 15).
The
introductory
milites is
typical
of limi-
tanean
titles,
though
it is borne later
by
two
(field
army?) regiments
which build the Golden Gate: the milites Cornuti iuniores and the
milites
primo sagittarii Leones iuniores
(I.L.S., 9216).
The Notitia
knows them not.
89
Appendix iv,
with other
examples.
263
ROGER TOMLIN.
The
unique title, equites
Scutarii iuniores scolae
secundae,
of
a
regiment
in the African field
army,
is the clearest illustration
of a Court unit "
fathering
" one in the
provinces.
The occasion
may
be
guessed.
In
365,
to forestall an invasion of
Africa,
Valentinian sent three officials
there,
who included the scutarius
Gaudentius,
an old
acquaintance
he could trust. Yalentinian
had been tribune of the second
scola,
so this was
probably
Gau-
dentius'
too;
in his
important mission,
he
might
have been
given
command of a small detachment of
scutarii,
which later formed
the nucleus of a
locally-recruited cavalry regiment.40
The Gothic
regiments
formed
by
Yalens had rectores Romanos
omnes,
ac-
cording
to Ammianus:
perhaps
more than
just officers,
if we
recall that his
predecessor
Tacitus had used the same word
rectores,
in a similar
context,
of Roman
legionaries
drafted into
a
newly-raised
cohort ad tradendam
disciplinam.41
If iuniores could be used to describe a
regiment
drawn from
another,
then we
might expect
the
parent-regiment
to be called
seniores. I
suggest
that Valentinian divided
regiments
into two
cadres,
not
necessarily equal
in
numbers, age,
or
experience,
which were then filled out with recruits who would mature more
quickly
side
by
side with old soldiers than if drafted into new
regiments.
This makes far better
military
sense than to
suppose
Valentinian cut vital
regiments
like the
Ioviani
into
half,
simply
to share them with his brother.42
By building
from
cadres,
he
could
expand
the field
army rapidly,
to
compensate
for Julian's
losses in
Mesopotamia,
and to meet the fresh round of barbarian
invasions that threatened him.43 Harsh
recruiting
was neces-
sary.
Both Valentinian and Valens
promptly
reasserted the rule
that soldiers' sons were to follow their fathers into the
army.
Deserters were hunted down. Gallic
peasants,
and Germans from
40
Amm., XXVI, 5, 14; XXV, 10,
9.
41Amm., XXXI, 16,
8 and
Tacitus, Agr., 28,
1. Ammianus continued
the Histories
(XXXI, 16, 9),
and echoes Tacitean
language (G.
B. A.
F letcher,
Rev. de
Phil.,
XI
[1937],
pp.
389-92).
He
does, however,
commonly
use rector of a
regimental
commander or field officer.
42
Constantius had
proposed
as much with Julian's Gallo-German
regiments (lectos
ex numeris aliis
trecentos, Amm., XX, 4, 2).
The
result,
whether intended or
not,
would have been to
cripple
the Gallic
field
army (Libanius, Or., 18,
90
ff.; Julian, 282D).
48post procinctus
Parthici
clades,
Amm., XXX, 8, 8,
cf.
Libanius,
Or.,
18,
280. The crisis of 364:
Amm., XXVI, 4,
5-6.
264
"SENIORES -IUNIORES."
across the
Rhine,
were
pressed
into the
army.
In
Gaul,
men cut
off their thumbs to avoid the draft.
They
were forced to do
alternative service.
Later,
Valentinian ordered that
they
be
burnt alive
(a typical gesture).44
The direct result was a cruel
increase in
taxation,
which Valentinian and his
sympathisers
justified by
reference to the
military
crisis.45
Division of
regiments
into seniores and iuniores continued
throughout
the fourth
century,
to
judge by
the Theodosian and
post-Theodosian
date of
some,
and also because the
great
ma-
jority
are divided within their own comitatus. If
"
division"
is in fact
doubling,
then the Notitia lists
betray
an
unsuspected
increase in
army
numbers
during
the later fourth
century.
Its
extent cannot be
calculated,
because we do not know how
many
regiments
have
disappeared
from the
Notitia,
nor how
many
are
"ghosts."
The lists have also been swelled with
promoted
limitanei.
Disregarding
these
pseudocomitatenses,
we find 143
field
army regiments
in the eastern
armies;
48 of them seniores
or
iuniores, representing
32
original
titles. This
suggests
a total
original
establishment of 127
titles,
increased
by
about 30
regi-
ments.46 The
apparent
increase of
nearly one-quarter was,
in
fact,
greater still,
since some divided
regiments
were raised in
toto after 364. The
corresponding figures
in the west
(by
col-
lating
Occ. 5 and 6 with Occ.
7)
are 159 field
army regiments,
87 seniores or iuniores
(from
51
original titles).
This
suggests
an
original
establishment of 123
titles,
increased
by
about
50,
or about two-fifths.
These
figures
are offered
only
to
suggest
a new
analysis
of
the Notitia lists.
They
are most
unlikely
to be
accurate,
in
view of the
difficulty
of
determining any "original
establish-
44
Soldiers' sons: C.
Th.,
VII, 1,
5
(364);
8
(365); VII, 22,
7
(Valens, 365).
Deserters: C.
Th., VII, 18,
1
(365).
Evasion: C.
Th.,
VII, 1,
10
(367).
Thumbs:
C.Th., VII,
13,
4
(367);
5
(368
or
370).
Recruitment of Gauls and Germans:
Zos., IV, 12,
1.
45
Zos.,
IV,
16,
1. Valentinian's
sympathisers
felt he was forced to
be
harsh,
after
inheriting
an
empty Treasury,
like Aurelian
(Amm.,
XXX, 8, 8,
cf.
Jerome, Chron.,
a.
365).
Petronius Probus' harsh ex-
actions ruined
Illyricum
"before the barbarians did"
(Jerome, Chron.,
a.
372,
cf.
Amm., XXX,
5,
4 ff. and C.
Th., IX, 42, 7).
46
95
regiments carry
no suffix
(143
minus
48),
to which add the
32
regiments
later
doubled,
to make an
"original
establishment" of
127 increased to about 160.
Similarly
for the West.
265
ROGER TOMLIN.
ment" when the western armies have
plainly
suffered
heavy
losses.
(The army
of Gaul has been torn to
shreds).
The eastern
army,
we
know,
was shattered at
Adrianople.
Evidence
remains,
however,
in the
ubiquitous
seniores and
iuniores,
of a substantial
increase in the
army's
establishment
during
364-395. Its con-
sequences,
a
spiralling taxation,
and the
growing military
arro-
gance deplored by Ammianus,47
are not
peculiarly
late-Roman.
ROGER TOMLIN.
CORNELL UNIVERSITY.
UNIVERSITY OF KENT AT CANTERBURY.
Appendix
i:
Regiments
named
by
Ammianus Marcellinus
F rontier units
(b)
are included for
completeness,
since Clark
never finished his
promised
volume of Indices.
Regiments'
status is
not
given by Ammianus,
but for field
army
units can
usually
be
recovered from the Notitia.
Conjectural rankings
in brackets.
(a)
F ield armies
Armaturae scola
pal. XIV, 11, 21; XV, 4, 10; 5, 6; 33; XXVII,
2,6,
Ascarii aux.
pal.
XXVII, 2,
9
Ballistarii
1
XVI, 2,
5
Batavi aux.
pal. XVI, 12,45; XX,1,3; 4, 2; XXVII, 1,6;
8, 7; XXXI, 13,
9
Bracchiati aux.
pal. XV, 5,30; XVI, 12,43
Candidati
2
XV, 5,16; XXV, 3, 6; XXXI, 13,14; 16; 15,
8;
9
Catafractarii
1
XVI, 2,
5; 12,
63
Catafracti
1
XVI, 10, 8; 12, 38; XXVIII, 5,
6
Celtae aux.
pal. XX, 4, 2; 20; 5, 9; XXI, 3,2; XXII, 12, 6;
XXXI, 10,
4
Comites vex.
pal. XV,
4,10
Constantiani
leg.
corn.
XXIX, 5,20;
22
Cornuti aux.
pal. XV, 5,30; XVI, 11,9;
12,43; 63; XXXI,
8,
9
Divitenses
leg. pal. XXVII, 1,
2
4
Amm., XXVII, 9,
4: .. .hunc
imperatorem (Valentinian)
omnium
primum
in maius militares
fastus
ad damna rerum auxisse communium.
Cf. voracis militarium
fastus (XXX, 7, 10),
and
XXI, 16,
2 and
XXVII, 9,
1. Not that Valentinian and his seniores were
entirely
to
blame,
for before his accession Ammianus had
already
satirised the
ferox
in suos illis
temporibus
miles et
rapaw (XXII, 4, 7);
a common-
place
in Aurelius
Victor, writing
under Constantius
(Liber
de Caesari-
bus, 11, 9; 18; 26, 5; 35, 11).
266
"
SENIORES-IUNIORES."
D. iuniores
(leg. pal.)
Domestici Protectores
Domestici
Protectores
Comes Domesticorum
-commands D. Pro-
tectores
-commands Domes-
XXVI, 6,12; 7,14
XV,3,10; 5,22; XVIII,3, 6; 8,11; XXI,
16, 20; XXVI, 5,
14
XXV, 5,4; 10,
9
XIV, 7, 9; 12; XV, 3,11; XVIII, 5,1; 9,3;
XXV, 5, 8; XXVI, 10,1;
XXX,
7,3
XIV,10,8; 11,14;
XX,
4,21; XXVI,8,7;
XXXI, 7, 4;
10,
6
XVIII,
3,
6
tici XIV, 11,19; XXI, 8,1
Eruli/Heruli/Aeruli
XX, 1, 3; 4, 2; XXV, 10, 9; XXVII, 1, 6;
aux
pal.
8,
7
(F lavia) leg.
I and II XXIX, 5,18
Gentiles scola
pal.
XIV, 7,9; XV, 5, 6; XVI, 4,1; XX, 2, 5;
4,
3; 8,13; XXVII, 10,12
Herculiani
leg. pal. XXII, 3,2; XXV, 6,
2
Ioviani
leg. pal.
XXII, 3,
2;
XXV,
5,
8; 6, 2; XXVII, 10, 10;
XXIX,
3, 7
Iovii aux.
pal. XXV, 6,3; XXVI, 7,13; XXVII, 8,7
Laeti8 XXI, 13,16
Lancearii
leg. pal. XXI, 13,16; XXXI, 13,8
Mattiarii
leg. pal.
XXI, 13,16; XXXI, 13,8
" numeri Moesiaci" XX, 1,
3
Petulantes aux.
pal.
XX, 4,2; 18; 20;
5,
9; XXI, 3,2; XXII, 12,
6;
XXXI,
10,4
Primani
(leg. pal.)
XVI, 12,49
Promoti vex.
pal.
XV, 4,10; XXXI, 13,18
Reges
(aux.
pal.)
XVI,
12,45
cohors iv
Sagittariorum XXIX, 5,
20
vex. corn.
sagittarii
Scntarii
XXX, 1,11; XXXI, 12,2;
16
scola
pal.
XIV,
7,9; XV, 4,9; XVI,4,1; 6,2; 12,2;
XX, 4,
3;
8,13;
XXI,
8,1; XXVI, 5,14;
XXVII,
10,12; 16;
XXIX,
1,16; XXXI,
10, 20;
12,
16
1These titles
"express military
function or
armament,"
but Am-
mianus seems
usually
to have had
specific regiments
in mind.
'The
Emperor's
immediate
bodyguard, probably
drawn from the
scolae,
for which Ammianus has several non-technical terms.
armigeri:
XXXI, 10, 3;
21
(actually
in the
Petulantes); XXXI, 13,
8.
impera-
torius comitatus:
XXXI, 10,
14. cohors
praetoria: XVII, 13, 10;
cf.
XVI, 12,
49 (castra praetoria).
The Praetorians
enjoyed
a
literary
after-life,
cf.
Symmachus, Or., 1,
23.
Also used of a German
raiding-party (XVI, 11, 4),
and of Germans
settled in Gaul
by
the Roman
government (XX, 8, 13).
267
ROGER TOMLIN.
trib. Scutariorum
XIV,10,8; 11,11; 14; XVI,11,6; XVII,
10,5; XIX, 11,16; XX, 2,5; XXX, 1,11;
XXXI, 8,
9
trib. scolae I
XXII, 11, 2; XXVI, 1,4
trib. scolae II
XXII, 11, 2; XXV, 10, 9; XXVI, 1,
5
Tertiaci
(vex.)
XXV, 1,
7
Thebaeae
legiones
XIV, 11,15
Tungrecani
4
leg. pal.
XXVII, 1,
2
T. iuniores
(leg. pal.)
XXVI, 6,12
Victores aux.
pal.
XXIV, 4,23; XXV, 6,3; XXVI, 7,13;
XXVII, 8,
7
Zianni
(leg. corn.) XXV,
1,19
(b)
F rontier armies
Alamannorum numerus
Areani
5
leg.
II Armeniaca
ps.
corn.
Comites
Sagittarii
6
legg.
Constantiacae7
Decentiaci
7
Decimani
Diogmitae
leg.
I F lavia
leg.
II F lavia
F ortenses
Gothi
"indigenarum
turma"
(Amida)
ex
Illyrico
duae turmae
7
Magnentiaci
7
Martenses milites
leg.
Moesiaca
leg.
Pannonica
leg.
I Parthica
leg.
II Parthica
leg.
V Parthica
Praeventores
sagittarii
"
cohors"
XXIX,
4,
7
XXVIII, 3,
8
XX, 7,1
XVIII, 9,
4
XXI, 11,
2
XVIII, 9, 3;
cf.
XIX,
5,
2
XVIII, 9,
3
XXVII, 9,
6
XX, 6,
8
XX, 7,
1
XVIII, 9,
3
XXXI, 16,
8
XVIII, 9,
3
XVIII, 8,
2
XVIII, 9, 3;
cf.
XIX,
5,
2
XXVI, 6,
7
XXIX, 6,
13;
14
XXIX,
6,13;
14
XX, 6,
8
XX,
7,
1
XVIII,
9,
3
XVIII, 9,
3
XXI,
11, 2; (another)
X)
SIX,
6,
11
4
V reads tunc
grecani
as in the Notitia and C. I. L.,
XIII, 5190. This
spelling
is
preferable
to Clark's Tungricani (G).
Not a
regular
unit. F or a defence of the MS
reading (and
a
possi-
ble
explanation),
see C. E.
Stevens, Latomus,
XIV
(1955), p.
395.
A field
army title,
but in Amida for the
siege, perhaps by
accident.
7If
technically limitanei,
nonetheless
"mobile,"
since
they
were
freely
drafted from one frontier to another.
Many
limitanean units
took
refuge
in Amida
(XVIII, 9, 3),
and the dux Osrhoenae took
part
in the Persian
expedition
(XXIV, 1, 2),
which
suggests
limitanei
might
operate away
from their bases.
268
"
SENIORES-IUNIORES."
Saracenorum cuneus
XXXI, 16,
5
Superventores XVIII, 9,
3
Tricensimani
(ps. cor.) XVIII, 9,3
sagittarii
Zabdieeni
XX, 7,1
Most are from the
Mesopotamian frontier,
of which Ammianus had
personal knowledge. Only
barbarian
contingents
which formed
part
of the Roman
army
are included
(though
the Saraceni are
doubtful).
Appendix
ii: The
cemetery
of
Concordial
In 1873 an
early
Christian
cemetery
was discovered outside the
Roman town of colonia lulia Concordia. When excavation ended in
1875,
270
sarcophagi
had been
uncovered, many
with
epitaphs
in-
scribed
upon
them.
They
were of uniform
type,
and the
language
and
lettering
are
fairly
uniform also. Internal evidence showed that the
cemetery
was in use some time after
362/3 (the
date of a re-used
inscription)
and before 452
(the
sack of Concordia
by
the
Huns,
when the
cemetery
seems to have been
disturbed).
Three
epitaphs
are
actually
dated: one to the
consulship
of Arcadius and Honorius
(394, 396,
or
402),
and the others to
409/10
and
426/7.
Unfortu-
nately,
the
cemetery could not be
preserved
in
situ,
and no record
seems to have been
kept
of its exact
layout.
Nor have the
epitaphs
all been
published
in a
single group, though many
were collected
by
Mommsen in
C.I.L.,
V
(1877), pp.
1058 ff.2
The
epitaphs
name between them 22
regiments
of the late Roman
army (nearly
all
palatini
and
comitatenses),
and form its most im-
portant epigraphic
source. Intensive
study
of these 36
epitaphs,
culminating
in their definitive
publication by
Dr. Hoffmann
(in
Museum
Helveticum,
XX
[1963], pp. 22-57),
has
given
a
misleading
impression
of the site as
being
a
"military cemetery."
In
fact,
also
buried there are two
praepositi
and four
variously-ranking fabri-
censes from the local arrow
factory (cf.
Occ.
9,24);
at least nine
Syrian immigrants
(and
probably
the four other
Aurelii);
and over
a dozen
civilians, usually
with their wives.4
They
include an
archiater,
a cohortalis from Dacia
Ripensis,
a
principalis
from
Mursa. Not
published
by
Hoffmann are a domesticus and his wife
(V,8738),
and a veteranus and his wife
(8749). Only
the local
bourgeoisie
could afford these substantial stone coffins
(de prop(r)io
suo
usually);
almost
every
soldier and
fabricensis
is an NCO. There
P. L.
Zovatto,
Antichi Monumenti Cristiani di Iulia Concordia
Sagittaria (1950),
cited in n. 5 as Zovatto. G. Brusin and P. L.
Zovatto,
Monumenti Romani e Cristiani di Iulia Concordia
(1960).
2
Bibliography
in
Hoffmann,
Museum
Helveticum,
XX
(1963), p.
26.
3"Concordiae in militum
sepulcreto" (Diehl).
4
The actual
figure may
be more.
Soldatengrabschriften
are collected
by Hoffmann,
but I have not been able to trace all the civilians'
sarcophagi.
269
ROGER TOMLIN.
is no
apparent
difference between soldiers' and civilians'
sarcophagi,
whether in
language, style,
or
position
in the
cemetery.
To all
ap-
pearances, they
were buried side
by side, just
as (it is
tempting
to
suppose) they
were in life. ".. . il
sepolereto
era commune a tutta
la cristianita di Concordia
(earthly goods permitting,
one
might
add),
non era
speciale
dei militi della
truppa
di
guarnigione
o di
passaggio
. . ."
5
Hoffmann, however,
claims "eine Reihe von Anzeichen"
(op.
cit.,
p. 25)
show that the soldiers came from an
army
drawn from
eastern and western
units,
cantoned in Concordia
by
Theodosius
after his
victory
at the
F rigidus (i.
e. winter
394/5).
F rom his
commentary,
the "Anzeichen" seem to be the eastern
origin
of half
the 22
regiments.
Which is dubious. The Batavi
seniores,
the
Mattiaci seniores and
iuniores,
are said to have returned from the
east on no better evidence than their
appearance
in both eastern and
western field
army
lists in the Notitia. These
lists, however, post-
date the division of the
Empire
in
395,
and these are
simply
examples
of
homonymous regiments
in both
partes imperii (cf.
the
Promoti,
Regii,
etc.). The
Armaturae, loviani,
and F ortenses Hoff-
mann allows
may
be either eastern or
western,
but he
prefers
to see
the eastern iuniores in the Brachiati
(rather
than the seniores of
Italy,
or the iuniores of
Gaul),
because of the Gothic names of the
two NCO's who
bury
the dead man.
However,
Gratian like The-
odosius came to terms with the Goths
(the Ostrogoths
seem to have
been allowed to settle in
nearby Pannonia),
and it is unreasonable
to
suppose
the western
empire, desperate
for
recruits,
would have
confined itself to Gauls and Germans. The numerus
primae
Martiae
victricis Hoffmann
identifies, surely correctly,
with the
Martii,
a
leg.
corn. in east
Illyricum (probably
the
leg.
I Martia active on the
Danube under
Valentinian).
The comites seniores
sagittarii
are
unknown to the
Notitia,
and their station
during
the 390's cannot be
inferred from the
presence
of comites
sagittarii
iuniores in Or. 5.
The
Regii
Emeseni ludaei are likewise unknown to the
Notitia,
and
their identification with the eastern
Regii supposes
that someone
deleted their full title after
reading
C.
Th., XVI, 8,
24
(418),
Honorius' edict
banning
Jews from
military
service. In no other
place
is there evidence the eastern lists have been modified after ca.
395. There is some
chance,
in
fact,
that the
Regii
are Ammianus'
Reges.6
We
certainly
cannot be sure whether the eastern or western
iegii
are meant: Emeseni had served in the west before. The
presence
of the Iberi
(=
the Hiberi in Or.
5) depends
on emenda-
tion and
interpretation
of a difficult
inscription,
for which Hoffmann
makes out a
convincing
case.
5Zovatto
(see
note
1), p.
17.
6
The Batavi seniores and the
Regii occupy complementary positions
in the lists of Or. 5 and Or. 6
(cf.
text above, note
10); Amm., XVI,
12, 45,
Batavi rveere cum
regibus, formidabilis
manus.
270
"
SIENUNIORE-IUIIORE."
Only
two
regiments (2 sarcophagi
out of
36) are,
in
my opinion,
certainly
eastern.
Eight
can be identified with units
placed by the
Notitia in
Italy;
5 with Gallic units (one
of
these,
Leones
seniores,
may
be the Leones of
Claudian);
2 in
Spain
(the
sagittarii
Nervii
are
probably
Claudian's
Nervii);
1 in western
Illyricum,
and 4 un-
certain. The
army
(397-8)
listed
by
Claudian as sent from Pisa to
north Africa
(B. Gild., I, 415-23)
offers similar
discrepancies
with
the Notitia.7
Internal evidence does not
suggest
the
army
which
swept
Theo-
dosius
through
the Balkans to
victory
in 394. Several are buried
by
their
colleagues (Hoffmann, 1, 5, 12, 14),
a brother
(5),
a son and
a kinsman
(8,
instantibus
collegis).
But Vassio
(20),
who was
60,
and had served 35
years
in the Batavi
seniores,
is buried
by
the
wife "who lived with him 22
years."
F lavia
Optata (36)
stands
in some
unspecified
relationship
to a soldier of the
Regii
Emeseni
Iudaei.
F andigildus, protector
de numero
Armigerorum (11),
had
the
foresight
to
purchase
his
sarcophagus
vivo suo. This
may
well
be his retirement-rank
(C. Th., VII, 20,
12
[400],
cf.
VII, 20, 5;
8
and
XIII, 1, 7); compare Alatancus,
a
domesticus,
who was buried
with his
wife,
with the
provision
that "no one of our
family,
or
anyone else,
be laid in this
grave"
(C.I.L., V, 8738).8
He seems as
settled in
Concordia as the veteran
Gidnadius,
buried
nearby
with
his wife
(V, 8749). Why
not also the two veterans from the
Mattiaci iuniores
(28, 29),
one of whom
(28)
intended the
grave
for
himself and his
son,
with the usual sanction
against
violation
post
obitum eorum? Some such sanction is
repeated
on all the
military
sarcophagi,
and
usually
also the claim that
they
were
bought by
the
deceased de
proprio
suo. The civilians
say exactly
the same. As a
precaution,
Mansuetus
(31)
entrusted his
grave
to the
protection
of
"the veterans." Three other soldiers
(11,
14,
35),
like
Alatancus,
entrusted their
graves
to the
protection
of the Church of Concordia.
What sort of
striking
force is
this,
which includes veterans and
60-year-olds
(not
to mention their
wives),
a
girl (daughter
or
mistress?),
a
civil servant
(38),
and a
petty magnate
from Mursa
(39)
? If this was a
temporary cantonment, why
did Mansuetus
believe there would be veterans to look after his
grave?
Could
Dassiolus have
expected
his son to share his
grave-and
would
Alatancus need to fear his
family's avarice? The soldiers buried
their dead side
by
side with the local
bourgeoisie.
Ties of friend-
ship developed:
Vettius Serenianus
(10), hospes
et heres
eits,
buried the NCO billeted
upon him,
and inherited his
property.
Some
may
have died in transit:
perhaps
the two
easterners
(12, 35), although
we
might
note that Concordia
was the
home of
7
Cf.
text, above,
n. 11.
8
Alatancus' wife and
family suggest
that he was
elderly
or
retired;
his rank as domesticus is indecisive
(Carpilio
[16] is a
30-year-old
example,
de numero Batavorum
seniorum).
271
ROGER TOMLIN.
numerous
Syrians.
F ield
army
units
passed through Concordia,
or
were billeted
there,
when Maximus advanced to
Aquileia (388),
and
Eugenius
stood on the
F rigidus (394).
Honorius made a
lengthy
excursion to Patavium and
nearby
Altinum in 399. The
regiment-
pair
of the Batavi seniores and the Eruli seniores must have been
based on Concordia for some
time,
for
they provide
11
inscriptions
between them
(8
of them
NCO's).
This would not be Concordia's
first
experience
as an
army
base: a
papyrus
of the later third
century
attests a cohors IV Concordiensium.9
By 406,
Stilico's
army
was based at
Ticinum,
where it mutinied
against
him in 408
(Zos., V,
26
4; 32, etc.).
The
army
stationed there in
405/6
amounted to 30
apLOBol (Zos., V, 26, 4),
rather fewer than the 44 numeri allocated to
Italy
by
Occ. 7. This list is
later,
and one would not
expect
Stilico's
army
was
any
smaller.
(If anything,
the reverse: 7 vexillationes is
very few.)
Thus considerable forces
may
have been stationed at
other
strategic points
of north
Italy
besides
Ticinum,
one of which
was Concordia. Other cemeteries
may
await
discovery.
That of
Concordia is an
epigraphic
document of the co-existence of soldiers
and civilians in the last
century
of the western
Empire comparable
with
Eugippius' Life of
Severinus.
Appendix
iii:
Epigraphic
evidence of
regiments
with the
supple-
mentary
title seniores or iuniores
Ten such
regiments
are known from Concordia
(Appendix ii).
This
appendix
collects others from the
Corpus
Inscriptionum
l.atinarum; Dessau, Inscriptiones
Latinae
Selectae;
and Annee
2pi-
graphique.
A few titles have been restored or
brought
into con-
formity
with Notitia
usage.
Selections
may
be found in
I.L.S.,
III,
pp. 471-4,
and in
Diehl, Inscriptiones
Latinae Christianae
Veteres,
nos. 436 ff.
scola Armeniorum
primaV,
6726
(Vercellae)
equitis
seniorum
equites Armigeri
iun.
VIII,
9255
(Rusgunia, Algeria)
Balistarii sen.
A.E., 1908,
178
(the Crimea)
equites
Batavi sen. Concordia
Batavi sen.
Concordia
equites
Bracchiati sen. Concordia
equites
Catafractarii sen.
Concordia; XIII,1848 (Lyon)
Comites
sagittarii
sen. Concordia
Cornuti sen.
VI,
32963
(Rome)
milites Cornuti iun.
I.L.S., 9216
(Constantinople)
Hemeseni iun.
Syria,
VI
(1925), p.
129
(Algeria)
9
A. von
Domaszewski,
Die
Rangordnung
des r6mischen Heeres
(2nd
ed.,
B.
Dobson, 1967), pp. 185-7,
the career of Traianus Mucianus.
272
"
SENIOR-IUNORESIORES."
Heruli sen. Concordia
Ioviani sen. XIII, 3687 (Trier); I.L.S.,2789 (Milan)
(unspecified)
III, 10232 (Sirmium);
I.L.S.,
2788
(Arles);
A.E., 1940,
214
(Antioch)
Iovii iun. Concordia
Lanciarii sen.
I.L.S.,
2788
(Arles)
Lanciarii iun. A.E., 1927,
169
(Ladik,
N. E. Turkey)
milites Lanciarii iun.
A.E., 1922,
71
(Ulmetum,
in the
Dobrudja)
Leones sen. Concordia
milites felices Leones
sen.A.E., 1937,
254
(tskeles, Turkey)
milites
primo sagittarii I.L.S.,
9216
(Constantinople)
Leones iun.
IMattiaci sen.
Concordia; I.L.S.,
9215
(Bordeaux);
I.L.S.,
9481a
(Nicopolis,
E.
Turkey)
Mattiaci iun. Concordia
equites itemque pedites
I.L.S.,
1356
(Caesarea, Algeria)
iuniores Mauri
Osdroeni iun.
VIII,9829 (Algeria), Syria,
VI
(1925),
p.
134
Tungrecani
sen.
XIII,
5190
(N.
W.
Switzerland)
Appendix
iv: Some
peculiar
iuniores without
complementary
seniores: their
possible origins'
a)
iuniores with
regional
suffix
i. iuniores Britanniciani
Exculcatores
(Occ. 5),
cf. E. seniores
(Italy);
E. iuniores
(Spain)
Invicti
(Spain),
cf. I. seniores
(Spain);
I. iuniores
(E. Illyricum)
Victores
(Britain,
Occ.
7),
cf. V. seniores
(Italy,
Occ.
7);
V. iun-
iores
(Spain);
Honoriani V. iuniores
(W. Illyricum)
ii. iuniores Gallicani
Atecotti
(Gaul),
cf. Honoriani A. seniores
(Gaul);
Honoriani A.
iuniores
(Italy)
F elices
(Occ. 5),
cf. F . seniores
(Spain);
F . iuniores
(Italy)
Iovii
(Gaul),
cf. I. seniores
(Italy);
I. iuniores
(W. Illyricum)
Mattiaci
(Gaul),
cf. M. seniores
(Italy);
M. iuniores
(Gaul);
M.
Honoriani Gallicani
(W. Illyricum)
Salii
(Spain,
Occ.
7),
cf. S. seniores
(Gaul);
S. Gallicani
(Occ. 5)2
1
Western
regiments
are attested in both Occ. 5 and Occ. 7
(occa-
sionally
with
slight
differences in
title)
unless
stated;
appearance
in
one list
only implies
a late addition.
2
The Salii Gallicani are
probably
the Salii iuniores
Gallicani,
an
example
of a iuniores
gaining
a
regional
suffix.
273
ROGER TOMLIN.
iii. In the eastern
praesental
armies:
Sagittarii iuniores/seniores
Gallicani
Sagittarii iuniores/seniores
Orientales
Eq. armigeri
seniores
Gallicani,
cf.
eq. armigeri
seniores Orientales
(Or. 7)
b)
iuniores from the limitanei
equites
Catafractarii
iuniores
(Britain,
Occ.
7),
cf.
eq. Catafractarii,
Morbio
(Occ. 40, 21)
Cursarienses iuniores
(Gaul,
Occ.
7),
cf. milites
Ursarienses,
Roto-
mago (Occ. 37,21)8
Defensores
seniores
(Gaul)
and iuniores
(Gaul,
Occ.
7),
cf. numerus
Defensorum,
Braboniaco
(Occ. 40,27)
and milites
Defensores,
Confluentibus (Occ. 41, 24)
Secundani iuniores
(Britain,
Occ.
7),
cf.
legio
secunda
Augusta,
Rutupis (Occ. 28,19);
secundani Britones
(Oce. 7)
=
secunda
Britannica
(Occ. 5) (Gaul)
Septimani
iuniores4
(Gaul),
cf.
legio septima
Gemina,
Legione
(Occ. 42, 26)
Superventores
iuniores
(Gaul),
cf. milites
Superventores,
Mannatias
(Occ. 37,18)
The units in
(b)
are
pseudocomitatenses,
with the
exception
of the
Catafractarii,
and thus
typical
of
many
drafted from Britain and
the Rhine frontier into the field armies after 406. This rare use of
iuniores
may
indicate that the
parent-unit
remained in
being
(as
would
certainly
be true of
Leg.
II
Augusta
and VII
Gemina). By
contrast,
the
legionary
detachments which had been in the field
armies since
Gallienus,
the secundani
Italiciani, Octavani,
Decima
gemina, etc.,
never
carry
a
supplementary
iuniores.5
Appendix
v: Movements and divisions of some
palatine regiments
in Ammianus Marcellinus
Several times
during 364-378,
Ammianus records what is
appar-
ently
the same
regiment
in both east and west. This never
happens
in
353-363,
with the natural
exception
of the
imperial bodyguards
and the
regiments
which Julian took from Gaul to the east. After
the division of
364,
no further
interchange
of
regiments
between
east and west seems to have occurred in 364-378. In the crisis of
3Not from the Cursarienses
(leg.
corn. in
Gaul).
The identification
is
guaranteed by
the bloc of
regiments
from Occ. 37 drafted to Occ. 7.
'There is another
Septimani
iuniores in
Tingitania
(Occ. 7),
rank
uncertain,
but also distinct from the
leg.
corn. seniores-iuniores.
6Numismatic evidence of Gallienus' field
army:
M.
Alfoldi,
in
Limes-Studien:
Vortrdge
des 3. internationalen
Limes-Kongress
in
Rheinfelden/Basel
1957
(1959),
pp.
13-18.
274
" SENIORES-IUNIORES.1"
Procopius' usurpation,
Valens received no direct
military
assistance
from Valentinian
(XXVI, 5,13;
cf.
Symmachus, Or.,
1,17 ff.); nor
did Valentinian draw on the east for his
great
invasion of
Germany
(XXVII, 10, 6).
When
military
assistance was
requested by Valens,
Ammianus notes it
(XXXI, 7,3; 10,3).
The western
empire
was
reluctant to
spare troops (XXXI, 7, 4,
cf.
10,
6
dispositio prudens),
and in the
event,
Valens was able
(indeed willing)
to
proceed alone
(XXXI, 12,1; 7).
So when Ammianus seems to record the same
regiment
in both east and west
(the
Divitenses
-
Tungrecani
simul-
taneously),
he is in fact
describing
two
homonyms.
No further division of the field
army
seems to have taken
place,
though
small
adjustments may
have been made
(in
Illyricum,
and
in
drafting
Valens' lovii
-
Victores to the
west).
The combined
field
army
left
by
Theodosius in 395 was
simply re-separated by
Stilico into its western and eastern
components (Claudian,
In
Ruf.,
II,
6:
geminae
exercitus aulae, cf. 104:
utraque castra;
217: redeat
iam miles
Eous; cf.
161-2,
389
[with
B.
Gild., I, 430-1]).
1. loviani
-
Herculiani
Premier
infantry regiments
in both Ammianus and the
Notitia,
they
were raised
by
Diocletian and Maximian
(Zos., III, 30, 2),
and
jointly
commanded
by Magnentius
in Gaul in 350
(II, 4, 2).
Their
officers attended the trials of Chalcedon
(Dec. 361),
and
they
served
together
in the Persian
expedition (summer 363),
undivided as
yet,
the
signifer
of the Ioviani
deserting
to the
enemy.
The loviani
campaigned
in
Germany
in 368.
The Notitia
pairs
seniores in
Italy,
iuniores in Or. 5.
2. Divitenses--
Tungrecani
The iuniores
proclaimed
Proeopius
at
Constantinople (Sept. 365),
and cannot be the
pair
stationed in Gaul in Jan.
365,
defeated
by
the
Alamanni later in the
year.
The seniores are
paired
in
Italy;
the iuniores are absent.
3. Celtae
-
Petulantes
Served with Julian in Gaul. Constantius' demand for them
by
name
for the east
(winter 359/60)
made them
proclaim
Julian.
They
followed him to Antioch
(362),
where their
indiscipline
was notori-
ous. Since the
army
combined units from Gaul and
Illyricum
with
Constantius' field
army, they
must then have been the
only regiments
of the name.
(This argument applies
to other
regiments
mentioned
by
Ammianus in the Persian
expedition.)
They presumably
served
with Julian in
Mesopotamia (363). They
defeated the Lentienses in
Raetia in F eb. 378
(where they
seem to have been cantoned before
in winter
360/61).
The Notitia
pairs
the seniores in
Italy;
the Celtae iuniores are in
Africa,
and the Petulantes iuniores in eastern
Illyricum.
275
ROGER TOMLIN.
4. Eruli
-
Batavi
The Batavi
distinguished
themselves at
Strasbourg
(autumn 357),
and both
regiments campaigned
in Britain
(winter 359/60).
Con-
stantius demanded them
by
name for the east at this time. The
Eruli served on the Persian
expedition
(363),
and the Batavi were
perhaps
the 500 Gauls and
Germans,
men used to
swimming
the
Rhine from
childhood,
who swam the
Tigris
in
spate (XXV, 6,13-14
with
7,
3).
They
formed half an
army
defeated in Gaul in
365,
before Valentinian arrived.
(Ammianus
does not
say
whether
they
had returned from the
east, travelling
ahead of Valentinian
[who
moved
slowly,
and wintered 364/5 in
Milan],
or were a detachment
left behind
by Julian.) They
served in Britain in
367/68.
The
Batavi were held in reserve at
Adrianople
(Aug.
378).
Zosimus
says
that Valentinian was
nearly
killed in a
mutiny
of
the Batavi at Sirmium
(III,
35, 2,
i. e.
363),
and that for cowardice
in Gaul
(365?)
he
nearly
sold them into
slavery.
He seems to have
muddled his
source,
and what he
says
conflicts what is known of
Valentinian's movements from the
C.Th.,
so his statements should be
rejected.
The seniores are
paired
in
Italy.
The Batavi iuniores are in Gaul;
the Eruli iuniores are absent. A second Batavi seniores is in Or. 5.
5. lovii
-
Victores
F irst
appear
on the Persian
expedition (363), fighting bravely
alongside
the loviani
-Herculiani,
and like
them, apparently
the
only regiments
of the name. Valens sent them
against
Procopius
(Oct. 365)
to whom
they
defected.
They campaigned
in Britain in
367/68 with the Eruli
-
Batavi, surely
a second
pair.
The seniores are
paired
in
Italy;
the iuniores had been
paired
(Occ.
5),
but now
(Occ. 7),
the Iovii iuniores are in western
Illyricum,
the Iovii iuniores Gallicani in
Gaul,
and the Victores
iuniores in
Spain. They may
have been transferred to Britain as the
Victores iuniores Britanniciani.
Lancearii
-
Mattiarii
The
spearhead
of Constantius' advance
against
Julian
(361),
and
screen of Julian's advance down the
Euphrates (Malalas,
ed.
Dindorf, p. 330,
2
iff.).
Malalas,
who drew on accounts
by
members
of the Persian
expedition,
refers to them
jointly
as an
aptOGAs.
When the Roman
army collapsed
at
Adrianople
(378),
they
stood
their
ground.
The Notitia divides the
palatine
seniores and iuniores between
Or. 5 and Or. 6. To
judge
by
Ammianus and
Malalas, they
were
not so divided in 363.
Gentiles
-
Scutarii
Palatine scolae
regularly
associated
together by Ammianus. Con-
276
" SENIORES-IUNIORES."
stantius shared them with his
junior colleagues
Gallus and
Julian,
and the Scutarii at least were shared
by
Valentinian with Valens.
Until his accession
(364),
there were
only
two scolae of
Scutarii
attached to a sole
Emperor,
the F irst and the Second.
The Notitia attaches a F irst and Second scola of Scutarii to each
comitatus. The Gentiles are divided into seniores and iuniores in
the
east;
the west has iuniores
only.
Six more
regiments
found as seniores-iuniores
appear
in Ammi-
anus,
but without evidence for
(or against)
division.
They
are
(with
dates of
appearance
in
parenthesis)
the Armaturae
(354, 366),
Ascarii
(366),
Brachiati
(355, 357),
Cornuti
(355, 357, 377),
Primani
(357),
and Promoti
(355, 378).
Appendix
vi:
Regiments
divided
by
seniores and iuniores
1.
Between WEST and EAST
sen. iun.
(9)
Armaturae Herculiani Ioviani Pannoniciani Petulantes
Divitenses
Tungrecani
Iovii Victores
2
sen. Jun. sun.
(4)
Eq.
Batavi
Eq.
Brachiati Brachiati Invicti
sen. iun. sen. iun.
(3)
Ascarii Mattiaci
Eq.
Promoti
sen. sen. iun.
(3)
Batavi Cornuti Gentiles
iun.
sen.
(2)
Germaniciani Primani
iun.
sen. iun.
(1)
Mattiarii
2. Within the WEST3
(21)
Eq. Armigeri Armigeri propugnatores
Atecotti Honoriani
Brisigavi
Celtae
Eq.
Cetrati
Eq.
Cornuti Defensores
Exculcatores F elices Gratianenses
Eq.
Honoriani Leones
Honoriani Marcomanni Mauri Honoriani Mauri Tonantes
Propugnatores Eq. sagittarii
Parthi Salii
Eq.
Scutarii
Septimani
1
Each
regiment
is named
only once, although
some would
qualify
for inclusion under more than one rubric.
2
These four
regiments
(Divitenses ...
Viotores)
on the
authority
of
Ammianus.
'Usually,
but not
always,
in
simple
seniores-iuniores
pairs.
The
"lone" seniores and iuniores are
mostly
survivors of such
pairs.
ROGER TOMLIN.
Lone seniores
(7)
Armigeri
defensores
Eq.
constantes Valentinianenses
Heruli
Menapii
Moesiaci
Eq. sagittarii Eq.
Stablesiani
Lone iuniores
(cf. Appendix iv) (5)
Eq.
Catafractarii Cursarienses
Superventores
Valentinianenses
Secundani
3. Within the EAST3
(7)
Arcadiani Balistarii F elices Honoriani Lanciarii
sagittarii
Gallicani
sagittarii
Orientales
Eq.
Theodosiaei
Lone seniores
(7)
Eq. Armigeri
sen. Gallicani
Eq.
Amigeri sen. Orientales
Britones Constantini Martenses Solenses
Eq.
Germaniciani
Lone iuniores
(4)
balistarii Theodosiani felices Theodosiani
comites
Catafractarii Bucellarii
Eq.
comites
Sagittarii
NOTE: This
paper
was
planned
and written before I could
study
the
?monumental survey by
D.
Hoffmann,
Das
spiitrmische
Bewegungsheer
und die Notitia
Dignitatum
(Epigraphische
Studien,
VII: I
[1969]
and II
[1970]).
F uller and sometimes
different treatment of much that is discussed
here,
and in
particu-
lar of the
chronology
of
the Notitia's eastern field
armies,
will
be found in its more than 800
pages.
278

Seniores-Iuniores in The Late-Roman Field Army

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Seniores-Iuniores in The Late-Roman Field Army

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Seniores-Iuniores in The Late-Roman Field Army

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Seniores-Iuniores in the Late-Roman Field Army

Author(s): Roger Tomlin

You might also like