0% found this document useful (0 votes)
70 views3 pages

Literary Theories: A Sampling of Lenses: Feminist/Gender Criticism (They Are Separate But I'm Simplifying)

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 3

Literary Theories: A Sampling of Lenses

Literary theory is an attempt to understand the various ways that different


people read texts. Yes, we all know that not everyone interprets a book,
poem, or even a song the same way. Theory gives readers a chance to view
a text with a so-called different set of lenses.

This is merely an introduction to theory so I am just going to provide you with a few of the
more common schools of criticism. Remember most of these theories are quite detailed so
this is just a very brief overview of their main ideas and some theories have been
combined to keep things simple.

Feminist/Gender Criticism (they are separate but Im simplifying)
View society in a patriarchal and heterosexual way, which has hindered or prevented
women and homosexuals from realizing their true potential. Claim that both groups are
viewed negatively, inferior, or as the other.
Consider the gender/orientation of the author, characters
What roles does gender or sexuality play in this work? (Examine power
relations)
Look for sexual stereotypes either reinforced or contradicted
Imagine yourself as the opposite gender reading the text

Marxist Criticism
Views society based on the economic and cultural theory of Karl Marx and Friedrich
Engles. Assumes that each society is made up of a set of concepts, beliefs, values, and
ways of thinking influenced by economic and class structures.
Consider who has the power/money and who doesnt
What role does power, money, or class play in this work?
What happens as a result in differences in power/money?
Relate context of work to social-class of author and/or time period

Psychoanalytic Criticism
Views text as an expression of the personality, state of mind, feelings, and desires of its
author. Looks for the distinction between conscious and unconscious motives of characters
and author.
Consider the authors personality to explain and interpret a text
What psychological theories are present in the characters (Oedipal complex,
obsessive compulsive, sexual repression, denial, guilt)?
What repressed material is expressed in imagery or symbols?

New Criticism/Structuralism
Views text as existing independently. Meaning is discovered by doing a close reading and
not by examining outside sources.
Focuses on the meanings and interactions of words, figures of speech, and symbols.
Looks for complex interrelations and ambiguities within a text.
Analyzes how parallels are established and create a unity within the text

Narratology/Archetypes: A form of Structuralism that focuses on the structure of
stories. Identifies 31 actions that a story can contain and claims all stories pick from this
list. Also focuses on the specific character types that are repeated within all stories
hero, villain, trickster, orphan, mentor etc.
Deconstruction/Post-Structuralism (definitely the most confusing one)
Created by some very intelligent or very disturbed people who view literature as having no
meaning because language has no meaning. Basically, you can never really know what the
meaning of a story is because words are so abstract.

Historical Criticism/Post-Colonial
Views text as a closely related to the time during which an author wrote. Focused on the
social, political, economic, cultural, and/or intellectual climate of the time. Examines how
other cultures are viewed in terms of an overpowering Western literature base.
Looks at issues of colonization and imperialism
Rejects the idea of marginalized people as others
Celebrates hybridity (existing in two cultures at once)

Modernism/Post-Modernism:
Modernism is a rejection of traditional forms of literature (chronological plots, continuous
narratives, closed endings etc.) in favor of experimental forms. They have a nostalgia for
the past that they feel is lost so Modernist texts often include multiple allusions. Post-
Modernists follow the same principles but celebrate the new forms of fragmentation
rather than lamenting them.
Look for ironies within a text
Analyze fragmentation and a mixing of genres and forms
Blurs the line between high literature (classics) and popular literature (NY Times
Bestsellers)

Okay, now that Ive thoroughly confused you lets try it and youll see its actually kind of
fun. Lets analyze The Lion King a.k.a. Hamlet with a few of these theories. (Please dont
start singing)

Feminist/Gender: Can be viewed as the helpless role females have in society. The female
lions are used to provide food and care for the young yet it is the males that have all the
power. When Mufasa dies his power transfers to either his son or his brother. His wife is
never even considered. Nala is also clearly stronger than Simba yet she is considered
inferior.

Marxist: Can be viewed as the upper class (lions) trying to maintain power over an unhappy
lower class (hyenas). The lower class resents the privileges of better food and hunting
grounds that the upper class maintains. This conflict causes a rebellion, which disrupts the
normal social order causing chaos and destruction.

Psychoanalytic: Can be viewed as a classic case of sibling rivalryScar is savagely jealous of his much stronger
and might I say better looking older brother. Can also be viewed as the classic struggle to overcome feelings
of guilt or inadequacyboth of which Simba has after the death of his father.

Narratology: Simba represents the classic hero quest. Simba suffers from a loss of a
father figure and must go off on a journey to grow into his destiny. During his journey he
meets tricksters (Timon/Pumba) who also act as his helpers and finds a mentor (crazy
monkey with a stick). Nala also acts as the herald as she upsets the sleepy equilibrium in
which the Simba has lived and starts his growth. He then has enough strength (mental and
physical) to overcome the villain and restore everything to order.

You might also like